Hierarchy structure with temporal hierarchy join

Hi guys,
For characteristic Cost Element, Im using a time dependant hierarchy structure with temporal hierarchy join. In the query, Im selecting select hierarchy and From data, derivation.
If the hierarchy is created in SAP BI or if the hierarchy is imported from Excel, query is working properly.
If the hierarchy is imported from SAP ECC, the query giving me an error:
ABEND BRAIN (336): Hierarchy "xx" from characteristic 0COSTELMNT can be used here
Someone can tell me if its normal or if there is a way in order to correct this problem.
Thanks in advance,
Rubé

Similar Messages

Problems with temporal hierarchy join in BI7.0

Hello,
I am using the new feature temporal hierarchy join which enables viewing historical data over a time-dependent hierarchy.
Now this works fine as long as the hierarchy is being used in rows or columns. However if I use a hierarchy node as a selection in a structure element, the temporal hierarchy join does not work properly.
Does anyone have an idea if this should be supported?
Thanks in andvance,
Patrick

Hi Jorge,
we have BI Patch 15. I tried to find out which notes were implemented to solve the Problem.
I'm not sure which note was the leading note, but following notes were implemented:
0001061525
0001055725
0001051170
0001042353
0001041760
0001040649
0001039979
0001038008
0001036536
0001029689
0001024554
0001009908
0001002662
0001010516
Since then there have been further notes concerning different problem with the temporal hierarchy join.
I hope these will help to solve the initial problem.
Regards,
Patrick

Hierarchial Structure with Child Parameter

I have a query like this
select child
from t
START WITH parent = 'DIV'
CONNECT BY PRIOR child= parent
when i give some parent value its fetching the entire structure from DIV parent.
i need to restric the rows to some specific leaf. i.e i need a additional parameter called child where i will child value so that it have return only the row from that parent to given child.I dont need other trees.
For eg DIV is parent for A, B ,C
A is parent for D,E
B is parent of F,G,H
C has no child.
If i give parameter DIV is parent and G has child i need only this hierarchy. this should return only two rows
A and G
Please let me know if i am not clear..
Pls Help
VInoth.

Maybe combining the two hierarchies:
SQL> with t as (
2 select 'A' child, 'DIV' parent from dual union all
3 select 'B' child, 'DIV' parent from dual union all
4 select 'C' child, 'DIV' parent from dual union all
5 select 'D' child, 'A' parent from dual union all
6 select 'E' child, 'A' parent from dual union all
7 select 'F' child, 'B' parent from dual union all
8 select 'G' child, 'B' parent from dual union all
9 select 'H' child, 'B' parent from dual
10 )
11 select t1.child, t2.lev
12 from (select child from t CONNECT BY prior parent=child start with child='G') t1,
13 (select child, level lev from t CONNECT BY prior child=parent start with parent='DIV') t2
14 where t1.child=t2.child;
CHILD                       LEV
B                             1
G                             2you can add a condition on LEV that is the level in the top-down hierarchy...
But I think this could be slow...
Max

Temporal hierarchy join - validity (0TCTVINTV)

Hello experts,
today it is a hierachy display problem in a report:
We present a time dependent hierarchy structure with a temporal join. This is to have the postings in the correct periods of the hierarchy. A characteristic of this hierarchy is the validity period. This validity period is default displayed in the report. This cannot be suppressed in the query designer. Is there a way to suppress this?
Can you please help us with a sloution?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Were you able to solve this issue? I noticed that once you activate the temporal hierarchy join option in the orgunit the system automatically creates a new characteristics called 0orgunit1 and the validity 0TCTVINTV in this characteristic is 1 in the order of F4 column. The problem is that you cannot put 0orgunit1 into change mode and therefore it is not possible to change this value to 0. But were you somehow able to solve this issue?
Kind regards
Sara

Temporal Hierarchy Join activation error

Dear ALL,
I have activate the Hierarchy for 0CUST_SALES with CHECK the Radiobutton Time u2013Dependent Hierarchy Structure AND CHECK use Temporal Hierarchy Join.
I have generated also 0CUST_SALE1 for this CHECK.
When I use the Data Transfert Processes for import data to 0CUST_SALES(ATTR), I have the run time error for
SAPSQL_INVALID_FIELDNAME
Exception              CX_SY_DYNAMIC_OSQL_SEMANTICS .
The cause for this problem is the check use Temporal Hierarchy Join .
And the error Is in the include program u201CLRRSIF02u201D (procedure "VALUE_TO_SID_CONVERT_ASO") when execute this statement:
   SELECT SINGLE sid FROM (i_sidtab)
            INTO <l_s_valsid>-sid
            WHERE sidrange = <l_sidrange>
              AND nodename = <l_nodename>
              AND datefrom = <l_datefrom>.
   IF sy-subrc NE 0.
     <l_s_valsid>-sid = rrsi_c_sid-not_exist.
   ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
The (I_sidtab) is the table u201C/BI0/KCUST_SALESu201D, this table donu2019t have datefrom.
Is there a procedure for implementing Temporal Hierarchy in existing IO 0CUST_SALES ?
My SAP BI 7.0 has support packages 17.
Thancks.
Roberta

Try to apply the following OSS Note:
[OSS Note 1135854 - Follow-up note for Note 1132195|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1135854]
This OSS Note does make corrections modifications to the LRRSIF02 INCLIUDE for procedure VALUE_TO_SID_CONVERT_ASO. as the name suggests, this OSS Note will most likely require that [OSS Note 1132195 - Reducing the read accesses to RSDCHATHJ|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1132195] be applied first.

Temporal Hierarchy Join

Hi all,
Can any one explain me the concept of
Use Temporal Hierarchy Join
Use this to indicate whether the "Temporal Hierarchy Join" feature is to be used for this characteristic with time-dependent hierarchies With an good example?

Hi Sunil,
Have a read through these and any questions then let me no.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/80/1a6702e07211d2acb80000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs;jsessionid=(J2EE3414800)ID0649628450DB21019087468887407824End?blog=/pub/wlg/3113
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/03/eca042bde0c611e10000000a1550b0/content.htm
I have implemented it once in a HR scenario.
Cheers,
Nick.

How to use File Adapter with hierarchial Structure?

Hi,
How to use File Adapter with hierarchial Structure like..
Data:
--Header Details:
Line Item Details:
Data
Bcoz I am getting a Flatfile in a hierarchial way as shown below.
Header Details :1
Line Item a
Line Item b
Header Details :2
Line Item c
Line Item d
Kishore

Hey Kishore,
In order to create a structure you need to use the file with convertion mode on the sending communication channel of the file adapter.
check the link for the needed configuration paramters.
If the structure is more complexed you can use the Contetnt master(CM) from itemfield which allows to ceate XML file from complex flat files and more.
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/0d/5ab43b274a960de10000000a114084/frameset.htm">File sender adapter</a>
If you have any question i'll be more than happy to assist.
Nimrod Gisis

Drilldown on structure with hierarchy display shows additional result rows

Hi all,
difficult problem to explain, but I'll try:
- a structure for the rows axis
- the structure contains hierarchical elements
- each leaf node in the structure is defined as a characteristic C, restricted to certain values from a hierarchy
- additionally characteristic C is on the rows axis below the hierarchy (for detailed drilldown)
- for the row axis, "display as hierarchy" is selected (initial drilldown until structure only)
- on the columns some key figures
- zero suppression set to active for rows
So in Query Designer it looks like this:
1) Structure S
---> Subnode S1
> Element 1 (Characteristic C restricted to value V1 and V2 from hierarchy H)
---> Subnode S2
> Element 2 (Characteristic C restricted to value V3 and V4 from hierarchy H)
2) Characteristic C
Now what happens at runtime:
1. The user opens Subnode S1 and sees 1 row with cumulated values for V1 and V2
2. The user drills down further to Characteristic C
3. He sees 2 result rows below "Element 1": row 1 with value V1, row 2 with value V2
All fine.
4. Now the user opens subnode S2 and drills down to Characteristic C.
5. => The user gets 4 result rows for "Element 2":
    - one row with value V3 (as expected)
    - one row with value V4 (as expected)
    - one row with V1 and empty values (empty values OK, but complete row not expected!)
    - one row with V2 and empty values (empty values OK, but complete row not expected!)
So, apparently the OLAP processor has some issues when mixing structures with restricted elements, hierarchies and drill downs
Note: this is exactly the same behaviour as the last poster in this thread noticed:
[Re: Adding Hierarchy to Structure|Re: Adding Hierarchy to Structure]
Does anyone know about workarounds / solutions?
Hendrik
Edited by: HMaeder on Feb 25, 2010 5:31 PM

Advice from SAP so far is to go to BI Frontend SP11, which should solve the problem.
Edited by: HMaeder on Mar 17, 2010 10:04 AM

DP: Hierarchy in PlOb structure with hierarchy characteristic

Hi all,
currently we have client in the Apparel+Footwear industry, and as always their requirements are complex.
In our to-be-designed DP solution we built up a simple plannign hierarchy with two dimensions, market and product. On the product dimension (and I am not talking technical dimensions yet!) we have one special requirement to model a hierarchy in one characteristic with an unknown number of nodes, therefore it is about possible to model it as usual in the CVC.
Question therefore is, if in this special case a characteristic hierarchy makes sense, also planning wise, and if so, how dis/aggregation works in this complex environment.
To get more into detail:
Market hierarchy: global -> region -> area -> sub-area -> customer
Product hierarchy: brand -> product division -> ... -> model (hierarchy) -> article
So model (hierarchy) is our problem, as there are, for different product divisions, different levels of models in parallel (conceptual model -> design model (1:n) -> planning model (1:n)....) therefore being a hierarchy with different nodes, the number changing depending on what division you look on. Planning should be possible on each level...
If not possible, we have to come up with a fixed max. number of model levels, that potentially blows our CVC.
As always, this is partly the as-is, so the to-be will experience simplification anyway. Just want to check the technical feasibility, as I haven't heard from anybody that this works... except in BPS
Regards, and thanks in advance,
Klaus

Dear Klaus,
Can you elaborate more on this scenario.
Is is that in the hierarchy, under a one particular division, there can be a "conceptual model", "design model" as well as a "planning model"? or one division always has only a particular model under it?
Regards,
Kedar

Hierarchy query with dynamic start condition

Hi,
I have a table that stores hierarchical items (foohierarchy) and another one storing users and such items (useritems). Unfortunately the latter one is not consistent and misses some entries. I would like to fix that using pure sql. Fixing here means that a user that possesses a certain child element should also have parents of that child. There are a couple of obstacles here though. First the hierarchy table does not explicitly state which elements are top level elements. I am trying to fix that by emulating a proper structure and named that fixedhierarchy. A select statement that returns all intended user/item relationships would be nice.
Here some visualization and sample data, the sample data follows the pattern that each item uses its level as its suffix, but this shouldn't be exploited in the statement:
asci art:
-- A1 (peter,paul)
--   \_ B2
--   \_ C2
--        \_D3 (thomas)
--            \_X4
-- E1
--   \_F2
-- G1
--   \_H2 (heidi)sample data
drop table foohierarchy;
drop table useritems;
create table foohierarchy (
child_item varchar2(30),
parent_item varchar2(30));
insert into foohierarchy values ('B2','A1');
insert into foohierarchy values ('C2','A1');
insert into foohierarchy values ('D3','C2');
insert into foohierarchy values ('X4','D3');
insert into foohierarchy values ('F2','E1');
insert into foohierarchy values ('H2','G1');
create table useritems (
username varchar2 (40),
item varchar2(30)
insert into useritems values ('peter','A1');
insert into useritems values ('paul','A1');
insert into useritems values ('thomas','D3');
insert into useritems values ('heidi','H2');
commit;my attempt at fixing the hierarchy table
with fixedhierarchy as
(select parent_item,child_item from foohierarchy
union all
select distinct null parent_item,parent_item child_item from foohierarchy where parent_item not in (select child_item from foohierarchy))
select * from fixedhierarchy;What the select should return:
'peter'|'A1'
'paul'|'A1'
'thomas'|'A1'
'thomas'|'C2'
'thomas'|'D3'
'heidi'|'G1'
'heidi'|'H2'

Hi,
Thanks for posting the CREATE TABLE and INSERT statments; that's very helpful! Don't forget to mention what version of Oracle you're using. That's especially important with hierachies; every version since Oracle 7 has had significant improvements in how to handle them.
I'm a little comfused as to what you want. Are you trying to permanently change the tables? If so, show what the changed table(s) should look like when the job is finished. Post the output you would want to see from "SELECT * FROM useritems;" or "SELECT * FROM foohierarchy;", or, if you want to change both tables, from both.
It looks like you have two separate problems:
(1) Changing foohierarchy, so that every item appears once as a child_id. That means adding rows with NULL parent_item for all the roots ('A1', 'E1' and 'G1'). The query you posted seems directed toward this.
(2) Denormalizing useritems, so that when a username is linked to an item, the username is linked to all that item's ancestors, too. The results you posted seem to be what you want useritems to look like after this is done.
Here's how to do those things:
<h4>(1) Changing foohierarchy</h4>
The query you posted looks good. Do you see anything wrong with it? You can use that query (or something very close to it) in an INSERT or MERGE statement.
If you just want to add some new rows to foohierarchy, then you don't need the UNION: just the second branch of it. If you're cvertain that none of those rows already exist in foohierarchy, then
INSERT INTO foohierarchy (parent_item,      child_item)
     SELECT DISTINCT   NULL,          childitem
     FROM     foohierarchy
     WHERE     parent_item     NOT IN (
                         SELECT      child_item
                         FROM     foohierarchy
;If some of the roots might already be in foohierarchy correctly, then you'll want a something in the WHERE clause to make sure you don';t add a duplicate. A MERGE statment might do this better than INSERT.
<h4>(2) Denormalizing useritems</h4>
This adds new rows to useritems, to make it look like what you posted:
ERGE INTO     useritems     dst
USING (
     WITH     all_ancestors     AS
          SELECT     CONNECT_BY_ROOT child_item     AS descendant
          ,     parent_item               AS ancestor
          FROM     foohierarchy
          START WITH     child_item   IN     (
                                   SELECT     item
                                   FROM     useritems
          CONNECT BY     child_item   = PRIOR parent_item
     SELECT DISTINCT
          u.username
     ,     a.ancestor
     FROM     all_ancestors     a
     JOIN     useritems     u ON     a.descendant     = u.item
      )                    src
ON     (     src.username     = dst.username
     AND     src.ancestor     = dst.item
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
     INSERT     (dst.username,     dst.item)
     VALUES     (src.username,     src.ancestor)
;After doing this, "SELECT * FROM useritems;" will produce this output:
USERNAME   ITEM
paul       A1
peter      A1
thomas     A1
thomas     C2
thomas     D3
heidi      G1
heidi      H2Here's how it works:
Sub-query all_ancestors is a bottom-up CONNECT BY query, linking each node in useritems with all of its ancestors. CONNECT BY queries are often slow under the best circumstances; doing a join in a CONNECT BY query makes it even slower. It's more efficient to do the CONNECT BY query first, in a sub-query, and then join tht result set to other tables, as I did in src.

Auth Error in BW while executing a query with Company hierarchy

Hi All,
I have an issue in BW Reporting auth objects.. Hope to get resolved here.
We are using BI 7.0. However We are still using the Reporting auth objects for fiield level security. We are having a problem while executing a query with company code hierarchy ,which is built on a multiprovider.
The Background is as below
Multiprovider: ZM_CD01 with 5 infocubes
Query: Has 0COMP_CODE as free characteristics with display hierarchy for Japan (Node APSC_012 is fixed value)
Node APSC_012 has 4070,4076,407A,408A,9830 company code values under it.
Reporting Auth Objects:
Z0COMPCODE: (for flat values)
4070,4076,407A,408A,407M,407P,8236, :
ZHCOMPCODE: (For tree structure)
4070,4076,407A,408A,407M,407P,8080, :
APSC_MGMT_HIER (Nodes: APSC_012,APSC019)
Both the reporting authorization objects are checked for multi provider ZM_CD01 in RSSM
While executing the query the following Auth error is received.
You do not have authorization to read object "Z0COMPCODE" authorization on '0COMP_CODE'
When I change the values for Z0COMPCODE to * it works fine. No Auth error.
Please help me resolve this issue. It is very critical now as the user needs to execute some important reports.
Thanks in Advance.
Ramkumar C

Hi Chandra,
Try the following:
1. Go to tcode RSSM
2. Enter the cube ZM_CD01 (all the other cubes) then click change.
3. Afterwards, u201Cunchecku201D ALL Authorization Objects under this cube. (Repeate the same for all the cubes)
4. Click Save.
This will resolve the issue.
Rgds,
Raghu

Org unit Hierarchy structure between two Key date s

Hello Friends,
We have an issue with displaying HR Org unit hierarchy structure between two calendar months.
The BI Report has a selection parameter to select Org unit hierarchy , Calendar month From and Calendar month To
The BI Report is to display the no.of sick absence days for employees in a chosen Org unit hier.
Employee A had a sick absence of 5 days in the month 04.2011 in the Org unit X . The same employee had a sick absence of 4 days in 05.2011.The Org unit X then delimit in 05.2011 , the Org unit X is no longer in Org structure from 05.2011.
When we run the report for 04.2011 to 04.2011 , the employee A is showing absence under Correct Org unit ie X with correct Org structure .
When we run the Report for 05.2011 to 05.2011 , the employee A is showing absence under hierarchy Org unit Not assigned which is OK .
But the issue is when we run the Report from 04.2011 to 05.2011 , The employee A absence days 9 (5 +4 ) showing under Not assigned Org unit hierarchy structure which is the latest Org unit .
When I deactivate the Org unit hierarchy and choose tech name of Org unit , It is showing correct Org unit key
But The user would like to see 5 days under org unit X and 4 days under Not assigned with Correct Org unit hier structure when we run the Report from 04.2011 to 05..2011 .
We have a user Exit variable for the Key date in the Bex Report which seems to be taking only one date at any time .
Is there any way to get the correct figures under Org unit hier structure where employee had absence in when we put range of calendar months on a selection screen ?
Any advice appreciated.
Thanks.

Hi
Yes, we can display the same by using time dependent hierachy's i.e. your org is converted to time dependent so that respective employee shows with respective of time.
Regards
Jagadeesh.M

Org unit Hierarchy structure at Key date

Hello Friends,
We have an issue with displaying HR Org unit hierarchy structure between two calendar months.
The BI Report has a selection parameter to select Org unit hierarchy , Calendar month From and Calendar month To
The BI Report is to display the no.of sick absence days for employees in a chosen Org unit hier.
Employee A had a sick absence of 5 days in the month 04.2011 in the Org unit X . The same employee had a sick absence of 4 days in 05.2011.The Org unit X then delimit in 05.2011 , the Org unit X is no longer in Org structure from 05.2011.
When we run the report for 04.2011 to 04.2011 , the employee A is showing absence   under Correct Org unit ie X with correct Org structure .
When we run the Report for 05.2011 to 05.2011 , the employee A is showing absence under hierarchy Org unit Not assigned which is OK .
But the issue is when we run the Report from 04.2011 to 05.2011 , The employee A absence days 9 (5 +4 ) showing under Not assigned Org unit hierarchy structure which is the latest Org unit .
When I deactivate the Org unit hierarchy and choose tech name of Org unit , It is showing correct Org unit key
But The user would like to see 5 days under org unit X and 4 days under Not assigned with Correct Org unit hier structure when we run the Report from 04.2011 to 05..2011 .
We have a user Exit variable for the Key date in the Bex Report which seems to be taking only one date at any time .
Is there any way to get the correct figures under Org unit hier structure where employee had absence in when we put range of calendar months on a selection screen ?
Any advice appreciated.
Thanks.

Hi,
You can try adding two more attributes to Org Unit as "Calender month from" and "Calender month to".
In these attributes maintain the validity period for the corresponding master data.
For example, in your case you can maintain the master data as:
Employee | Org Unit | Calender month from |Calender month to | sick absence
A | X | 4.2011| 4.2011 | 5 days
A |    | 5.2011 | 05.2011 | 4 days
And in report use variables for Calender month from" and "Calender month to".
Hence, when user executes the report with selection as:
Calender month from" = 04.2011
"Calender month to"    = 05.2011
The data will be read from master data based on these selections along with key date and report will show output as expected.
Employee | Org Unit | Calender month from |Calender month to | sick absence
A | X | 4.2011| 4.2011 | 5 days
A |    | 5.2011 | 05.2011 | 4 days
Hope this works for you.
Regards,
Geetanjali

Product : Errors in attribute hierarchy structure SAP BCA 000164

Hi All ,
When ever i create /Display /Change Product in
Financial Supply Chain Management --> In House Cash > Master Data>Product Definition--> Product --> Create /Change/Display
system through below mentioned error .
I tryed to resolve problem as per below mentioned program through se38 , but still getting same error
Errors in attribute hierarchy structure SAP BCA 000164
Message no. FIPR217
System Response
An error was found in the attribute hierarchy.
In some cases, it is not possible to display the attribute hierarchy without having to correct the errors first.
Procedure
It is recommended that you run the FIPR_CLEAN_ATTRIBUTES (by using transaction SE38). This report can recognize errors, and it attempts to correct them automatically.
Caution: This report can change your table entries permanently.
Once this report has run, you need to check the hierarchy structure, and make any necessary changes.
Regards
Prakash Sharma

Hi,
the realignment (KEND) does not change the line item tables (CE1***, CE2***), thats why they remain unchanged.
The line items in CE1**** can not be changed. If you really want to have new line items (with the new prod. hierarchy) try in test-client if the use of report RKECADL1 and the new transfer to CO-PA for the deleted line items (KE4S, KE4SFI,...) can help you (SAPNET-note 69370 for details).
CE2**** + SQL-error: As per now, I don't have an idea how to deal with that cases.
best regards, Christian

Handling Multi hierarchial Structure using XSLT or Java Mapping in XI

Hello Experts,
I have an requirement wherein i have sender as IDOC and File as Receiver.My target File structure is multi hierarchial with parent level and many child sub level node.
I tried to generate flat structure using graphical mapping by creating an intermediate structure and then mapping it to flat structure but that seems to be very complex for my scenario as there are many sub level at target structure..
Is there any simple way of handlng these????
Thanks

Hi ,
I tried to implement your solution ..I am able to convert my idoc to XMLusing XLST but i have a question that how to convert that XMP to flat file as XI Receiver File adapter understand only 1st level of hierarchy..It doesnt understand nested level of hierarchy which is in my case...
Below is the xslt code which i have written:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
     <xsl:template match="/">
          <MT_SALES_PO_DATA_INBOUND>
               <xsl:value-of select="WPUBON01/IDOC"/>
               <xsl:for-each select="WPUBON01/IDOC/E1WPB01">
                    <E1WBBB01>
                         <Store_ID>A001</Store_ID>
                         <SYS_INVOICE_NO>
                              <xsl:value-of select="substring(BONNUMMER,'3','15')"/>
                         </SYS_INVOICE_NO>
                         <Cashier_ID>
                              <xsl:value-of select="KASSID"/>
                         </Cashier_ID>
                    </E1WBBB01>
               </xsl:for-each>
               <xsl:for-each select="WPUBON01/IDOC/E1WPB01/E1WPB02">
                    <E1WBB02>
                         <Transaction_Type>
                              <xsl:value-of select="VORGANGART"/>
                         </Transaction_Type>
                         <Article_Description>
                              <xsl:value-of select="QUALARTNR"/>
                         </Article_Description>
                         <ITEM_CODE>
                              <xsl:value-of select="ARTNR"/>
                         </ITEM_CODE>
                         <xsl:for-each select="WPUBON01/IDOC/E1WPB01/E1WPB02/E1WBB03">
                              <E1WBB03>
                                   <Condition_Type>
                                        <xsl:value-of select="KONDITION"/>
                                   </Condition_Type>
                                   <xsl:for-each select="">
                                        <E1WBB04>
                                             <TAX_Code>
                                                  <xsl:value-of select="MWSKZ"/>
                                             </TAX_Code>
                                             <TAX_Amount>
                                                  <xsl:value-of select="MWSBT"/>
                                             </TAX_Amount>
                                        </E1WBB04>
                                   </xsl:for-each>
                              </E1WBB03>
                         </xsl:for-each>
                    </E1WBB02>
               </xsl:for-each>
          </MT_SALES_PO_DATA_INBOUND>
     </xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Any idea how do i convert these XML to falt file USing XSLT or File Receiver adapter in XI???
Thanks

Hierarchy structure with temporal hierarchy join

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for