Higher version ASO to Low verion

Hi All,
I am trying to replace my existing ASO outline 9.3.1 version with 9.3.3 version .When I click on start database ,I am getting below error
*"There is a problem on loading the outline into memory , error # 1250053"*
When I click on OK , it shows message on the panel *"Error: 1002097 Unable to load database"*.
Please let me know if this is an Essbase issue or problem with the version difference.
Regards
Vishal

It is an unsupported scenario. I had to face it once with the same 920->901 versions. What I did was also absolutely unsupported at my own risk and it was a last chance action. I'll tell you what I did and how it worked for me, which doesn't mean it will work for any situation. If you open your file with a binary file editor you will see at the first file blocks a header that displays the export version "EXPORT:V09.02.00" This header is read by the import to check which version was used to generate the file and prevent an unsupported downgrade, I changed it to EXPORT:V09.00.01 and retried the import. A lot of error messages appeared, but it successfully loaded my information. I took the risk because I made sure this specific database contained just basic tables, indexes and version compatible objects and definitions, it was a testing environment, I didn't have the right Oracle version and there was no time to get it, and finally I had a bullet proof backup.

Similar Messages

Higher version clients than database

We are looking at developing some new solutions but one of the options is to use higher version Oracle clients than the database. Is this possible?
I have seen discussions on accessing a higher version database from lower version clients but not the other way round

Based on the Metalink Note 132904.1 (Compatibility Matrix for Export & Import Between Different Oracle Versions), the client version can not be higher than the target database. If you use the exp of the higher versioned client to export data from a lower versioned database server, it will fail. I was surprised - so I tested. Indeed I could not export data from 9.2.0.8 db server if I am using 10g R2 client. This or any other export import issue is not mentioned (not even a link) in the Note 207303.1
I hope this proves useful.

Importing dump taken from higher version to lower version

Hi all,
I have already taken dump from oracle 9.0.2 database without using exp utility of lower verion and alo without running catexp.sql script prior to export.
Now i need to import this dump into 9.0.1 database.It gives error due to backward-incompability.
Is there any way to import without re-exporting whole database again using exp utility of lower version against higher version.

It is an unsupported scenario. I had to face it once with the same 920->901 versions. What I did was also absolutely unsupported at my own risk and it was a last chance action. I'll tell you what I did and how it worked for me, which doesn't mean it will work for any situation. If you open your file with a binary file editor you will see at the first file blocks a header that displays the export version "EXPORT:V09.02.00" This header is read by the import to check which version was used to generate the file and prevent an unsupported downgrade, I changed it to EXPORT:V09.00.01 and retried the import. A lot of error messages appeared, but it successfully loaded my information. I took the risk because I made sure this specific database contained just basic tables, indexes and version compatible objects and definitions, it was a testing environment, I didn't have the right Oracle version and there was no time to get it, and finally I had a bullet proof backup.

Error while transporting function grp from lower version to higher version

Dear Experts,
While transporting the function group and function modules from system A to system B, I am getting the below error
"Program SAPLZATSCSNG_EINB, Include LEINBF10: Syntax error in line 000068
Field 'GF_ETS_MODIFIED' is unknown. It is neitherin one of the specified tables nor defined by a 'D"
System A is a lower version SAP system and system B is a higher version. I compared the code of Include LEINBF10 in both the systems and there is a data declaration of field GF_ETS_MODIFIED in system B. But this is missing in system A.
Please guide me for this issue.
Thanks in advance.

Thankyou for your reply Rob.
Actually I am transporting the function group and modules from my development system to the client development system.
I dont have any other option but transport the files.
Is there any possibility to modify the include without applying a patch or upgrading my system?
Edited by: ShwetaD on Apr 15, 2010 10:24 PM

Transporting a model in VC from higher version to lower version

Hi All,
How can i transport a model built in higher version to lower version.(EHP1 to 700.14 of Portal)
Also, will all my fuctionality work there if it is transported?
I have imported a model built on higher version of Sandbox to lower version of Dev server by changing its version manually by opening the model in notepad.But after deployment i am not able to see any of the functionality working.Such as-I am not able to submit the data enetred in the data fields.
Please help.
Thanks & Regards
Richa

Adding some points to the above question.
Also,I cannot clear entries from the data fileds, as there is not System Action defined for clear in version 700.14.
Please suggest,what changes shall i make.
Thanks & Regards,
Richa

Tranport Request from Higher version to Lower Version

Hello,
                  Can any One Know how to Transport Requests from Higher Version to Lower Version for Example
                   From Ecc6.0 Ehp1 to->>>>> Ecc6.0.    is there is any way or any SAP Note related to this?
                  Please, send me if any one done/ aware of it with the needful steps     ASAP
Thanks & Regards,
pavankumar.

Not sure you are in the right forum. You will have a better chance of an answer in a Basis forum.

Can a higher version of CAD be used with a lower version of UCCX?

We are running UCCX 8.02 and a customer asked if we can run CAD 8.5. Does anyone know a to run a higher version of CAD with a lower version of UCCX? We are planning an upgrade later but the customer wants to know if they can upgrade the CAD now.

Hi,
The answer is "NO". Its not tested and will not be supported as well incase if you hit some issues. So please use the compatiable versions all the time for better results.
Hope this helps.
Anand
Please rate helpful posts !!

Higher version of Oracle client version is compatible with lower version

Higher version of Oracle client version is compatible with lower version Oracle DB
Oracle 10.2.0.5 client version should be compatible with 10.2.0.4 DB ?

H wrote:
Higher version of Oracle client version is compatible with lower version Oracle DB
Oracle 10.2.0.5 client version should be compatible with 10.2.0.4 DB ?yes, compatible

High SQL version count and low executions from ADDM Report!!

Hi, all.
I am reading an ADDM Report.
I found something strange.
In the "SQL ordered by Version Count" section,
an applicaion sql statement has the value of 45 Version count
but has the value of 1 Executions. The time interval is one hour.
The database has only one applicaion user,
and thus all sessions connect to the same user.
What does "45 version count" mean??
The application is using bind variables.
How can I reduce this number??
I am hitting "library cache lock" wait event from time to time.
Thanks and Regards.
Message was edited by:
user507290
Message was edited by:
user507290
Message was edited by:
user507290

You could get a high version count if the bind variables are character type and allow large variations in length, see:
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/01/05/bind-variables/
The oddity of lots of versions with only one execution could be an unlucky timing thing relating to cursor invalidation - the child cursors can be left trailing with zero'ed statistics rather than being cleared out when they should be.
Problems with library cache lock can be a consequence of large numbers of versions - simply because many people want, and may have to create, different child cursors for the same statement at the same time. (However, you've already received some comments about RAC and gathering stats which can be an underlying cause of that issue).
Looking at it from a different angle, are there any global temporary tables involved, and if so are they 'on commit preserve rows', and Is this 10.1 or 10.2 ?
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Attempting to install a compiled 8.6.1 package fails with "NI Variable Engine (higher version already installed)

This is long as there are a collection of details I thought would be useful. Please bear with me.
I have a VI compiled with LV 8.6.1 PDS. The installer ran on the development machine and it works fine there (WinXP SP3).
Was handed a laptop (another WinXP SP3) that already had LV 7.0 (academic) on it. Someone was fiddling with an old version of LV. OK.
Wanted to uninstall 7.0 so there would be a clean field for the program compiled under LV 8.6.1.
So: Start --> Control Panel --> Add/Remove Programs and uninstalled "National Instruments Software". That went smoothly. It wanted a reboot. Fine.
Ran the setup program in my package, the one I'd wanted to install. No errors. The following installers were included with the Build:
* NI LabVIEW Run-Time Engine 8.6.1
* NI Measurement & Automation Explorer 4.5
* NI DAQmx 8.8
By the way, this generated an installation package of "almost" 900 megabytes.
Connected the hardware (one ethernet-based, another RS-232 based). Started the program, "EDGAR2".
First error:
Unable to locate the LabVIEW Run-Time Engine.
EDGAR2 requires a version 8.6.1 (or compatible) LabVIEW Run-Time Engine. Please contact the vendor of EDGAR2 to correct this problem.
(This is Error1.JPG, attached).
A check of C:\National Instruments\Shared\LabView Run-Time\8.6 shows that there is only one item in that directory: a sub-directory named "errors". That's it. If the executable is looking for something in the 8.6 directory, well, there's nothing there.
Uninstalled EDGAR2 using the Control Panel. Reinstalled. Same problem.
Downloaded the standalone LabVIEW Run-Time 8.6.1 installer, Standard Edition, from NI's site, unpacked, and ran the setup.exe from that package.
There is one box with a green checkmark in it: NI Variable Engine .
Click Next. Up pops a pane and Error2.JPG is attached. It won't continue because the "detected" version of Variable Engine is of a higher revision.
The "Next>>" button is grayed out.
Uninstalled EDGAR2 again. But there was no entry in the Windows uninstall panel for uninstalling any National Instruments software. This raised a flag in my mind and NI Support was telephoned.
With the Support Guy running Google searches for relevent topics (I'd done some of that, too), a number of things were tried.. ending up with deleting everything in C:\Program Files\National Instruments while in Safe Mode, everything in C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\National Instruments, going through the Windows Registry with REGEDIT, uninstalls and attempted reinstalls. Nope, nothing worked. That defective Variable Engine seems glued into the system
The application can't find the 8.6.1 run-time because it doesn't exist. It doesn't exist because both the standalone and built-in installers see a Variable Engine of a higher version installed and apparently won't install over it. There is no uninstall for any NI software in the Windows Control Panel --> Add/Remove pane and so I can't seem to get rid of this Variable Engine.
At this point, the Support guy says, "Time to reimage your computer. Call us for anything else.. you know we're here for you."
This is the first trouble I've had installing a compiled VI. All other packages built with 8.6.1 PDS just slid right in.
There's been a LOT of software installed on the target over the years and going on the proverbial "scavenger hunt" to locate all of the installation disks will be a time-consuming task (a week is a conservative estimate). Is there a solution to this problem? Where are the installers "looking" for the Variable Engine revision level? Is there a specific Registry key that can be adjusted?
Went looking through the WinXP Event log. No errors are popping up there.
Your time is appreciated.
Mark
Attachments:
Error1.JPG ‏17 KB
Error2.JPG ‏28 KB

Hi Mark,
I'm sorry to hear your having trouble installing the LabVIEW 8.6.1 Run-Time Engine. It sounds like there could be a few problems going on here. First, you should have more options when installing the Run-Time Engine than just the Variable Engine. If you uncheck the Variable Engine, does it try to install anything? Second, not being able to install the Variable Engine suggests that there may be something wrong with your registry. If you removed all National Instruments keys when cleaning the registry, then this shouldn't be a problem.
At this point, there are a couple things I would suggest. Unfortunately, the best solution would probably be to reformat. It sounds like some low level parts have been corrupted and this would be the quickest way to fix everything for sure. Other than that, you can try installing the full 8.6.1 Development System on the computer. This will install the Run-Time Engine on the computer. You can simply not activate the software, which means you won't be able to edit anything. You will be able to run the program, though.
Jared S.
Applications Engineering
National Instruments

Showing that "Higher version java already installed" when trying to install jre7u5 even after uninstall of java in mac os x 10.7.5

Hi
I am running mac os x 10.7.5.I have installed jre7u_17 in my mac.But uninstalled it by removing javaAppletPlugin.plugin and when i am trying to install jre7u5 it prompting me that "Higher Version of java already installed.But in terminal if i run java -version command it showing that "No runtime environment present".Please help me how to uninstall java completely from my mac and to install lower version of java.Please.

The next time you have the problem, note the exact time: hour, minute, second.
If you have more than one user account, these instructions must be carried out as an administrator.
Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
Make sure the title of the Console window is All Messages. If it isn't, select All Messages from the SYSTEM LOG QUERIES menu on the left. If you don't see that menu, select
View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar.
Scroll back in the log to the time you noted above. Select any messages timestamped from then until the end of the episode. Copy them (command-C) to the Clipboard. Paste (command-V) into a reply to this message.
When posting a log extract, be selective. In most cases, a few dozen lines are more than enough.
Please do not indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
Important: Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting.

Redirection is not happeing with higher version of Fire Fox (v 2.0.0.17)

Hi,
We are using sundirectory service (version 6.x) for login authentication via LDAP protocal. On entering the invalid user info on the prelogin page, it should redirect to the prelogin page with an error message, but it's not happening as expected with higher version of firefox(V :2.0.0.17 and above).The user authenticated redirection to prelogin page is happening as expected in IE 6.0 and lower version firefox (V1.0.7).
Could you please confirm whether sundirectory service or SAM supports the higher version of( V :2.0.0.17 and above) fire fox or Latest fire fox features/bug fixes creating the problem.

Hi Sheger77,
Thank you very much for suggesting installation Live Http Headers. I have done like what you suggested. I am able to see the live http headers and rensponse codes.The authentication is hppening correctly.
below is the authentication response from SAM server user password is wrong.
HTTP/1.x 200 OK
Server: Sun-ONE-Web-Server/6.1
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:05:32 GMT
Content-Type: text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1
Cache-Control: private
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: 0
X-dsameversion: Sun Java(tm) System Access Manager 6 2005Q1
X-autherrorcode: 107.
below is the authentication response from SAM server user username is wrong.
HTTP/1.x 200 OK
Server: Sun-ONE-Web-Server/6.1
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:49:41 GMT
Content-Type: text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1
Cache-Control: private
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: 0
X-dsameversion: Sun Java(tm) System Access Manager 6 2005Q1
X-autherrorcode: 103
One thing i did not understand is that the scenario to get the below page with a link "Return to Login page" in the firefox browser v3.0.3.
Sun Java System Access Manager (Authentication Failed)
Authentication failed.Return to Login page
On cliking the Return to Login page, i will get the below page.
Sun Java System Access Manager (Login)
This server uses LDAP Authentication
User Name: Password:
And a Log In Button.
This issue is happening with fire fox version browser 2.0.0.16 to till v3.0.3. Is there any chance of client validations restricting. The same code working as expected by the browser MSIE 6.0 and lower version of FireFox(V: 1.0.7). Is there any chance of client side(brower) security updates restricting the redirection to pre-login page. Please suggest.
Edited by: thims123 on Nov 5, 2008 11:55 PM
Edited by: thims123 on Nov 5, 2008 11:56 PM

Redirection is not happeing with higher version of Fire Fox (v 2.0.0.16)

Hi,
We are using sundirectory service (version 6.x) for login authentication via LDAP protocal. On entering the invalid user info on the prelogin page, it should redirect to the prelogin page with an error message, but it's not happening as expected with higher version of firefox(V :2.0.0.16 and above).The user authenticated redirection to prelogin page is happening as expected in IE 6.0 and lower version firefox (V1.0.7).
Could you please confirm whether sundirectory service or SAM supports the higher version of( V :2.0.0.16 and above) fire fox or Latest fire fox features/bug fixes creating the problem.

Hi sheger77,
Thank you for the kind information, but still I am not clear with the difference of behavior in prod & test regions.
We have two regions like prod & test. Both the prod and test has same environments (hardware & software). But the problem occurring only prod region but not in test. So I am not able come to a conclusion that the problem is with Sam server 6.1 version.
In the Sam code we have some intermediate pages, After authenticating the user by sun directory service, the control should go to a normal intermediate page and from that page it is coming to application Prelog-in page with an error message. It is happening as expected in test region; but in production, due to some exception at Sam code the control is going to an auth_exception intermediate page. So the control is not coming back to application Prelog-in page.
Would you please elaborate the suspecting reasons for throwing exception in Sam code.

Table export from higher version

Hi,
I have two database servers one on Oracle 10.2.0.3.0 -- 64bit and the other one in Oracle 9.2.0.4.0
I have a table in 10.2... and I want it to be exported to 9.2.... I know that exports from higher version could not be imported with lower version. How can I do this?
I have not yet tried to import with 9.2 so I don't have any error messages.
Thanks,

Well, you already got answers for this one. Just adding the relevant topic from the Utilities manual.

PL/SQL variables allowed lengths problem in higher version.

Hi All,
Before getting in to my problem here are two different DBs version.
DB1:
===========
SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.1.0
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.3.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
DB2:
===========
SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.5.0
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bit
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
My problem is plsql block which is working fine in DB1 (which is lower version) is erroring in DB2 (which is higher version).
Below is the block I am running and I have listed the results beneath the same. Please advise me on porting code from DB1 to DB2.
Program:
DECLARE
l_var1 VARCHAR2(32767);
l_clob_var1 CLOB;
l_clob_var2 CLOB;
l_clob_var3 CLOB;
l_clob_var4 CLOB;
l_position NUMBER;
BEGIN
l_position := 0;
FOR i IN 1..8191 LOOP -- This is (2 to the power of 13 )-1
l_clob_var1 := l_clob_var1 || 'a';
END LOOP;
l_position := 1;
FOR i IN 1..8192 LOOP
l_clob_var2 := l_clob_var2 || 'a';
END LOOP;
l_position := 2;
FOR i IN 1..8193 LOOP
l_clob_var3 := l_clob_var3 || 'a';
END LOOP;
l_position := 3;
FOR i IN 1..8617 LOOP
l_clob_var4 := l_clob_var4 || 'b';
END LOOP;
l_position := 4;
l_var1 := l_clob_var1;
l_position := 5;
l_var1 := l_clob_var2; ---- Error reported for this in DB2. Observe the position value 5 in below results.
l_position := 6;
l_var1 := l_clob_var3;
l_position := 7;
l_var1 := l_clob_var4;
l_position := 8;
dbms_output.put_line('No Errors reported');
l_position := 9;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR(-20999,'Error at position '||l_position||', SQLERRM : '||SQLERRM);
END;
Results:
======================================================
DB1:
======================================================
No Errors reported
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
All variable lenghts till 32767 are allowed here.
Db2:
======================================================
DECLARE
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-20999: Error at position 5, SQLERRM : ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value
error
ORA-06512: at line 38
PLSQL variable length till 8191 ((2 to the power of 13 )-1) chars are allowed here.
Thank you.
Mahi.

Here is results:
DB1
================================
SQL> select *from nls_database_parameters
2 where parameter = 'NLS_CHARACTERSET';
PARAMETER VALUE
NLS_CHARACTERSET US7ASCII
SQL> select * from nls_session_parameters
2 where parameter = 'NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS'
3 ;
PARAMETER VALUE
NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS BYTE
DB2
============================================
SQL> select *from nls_database_parameters
2 where parameter = 'NLS_CHARACTERSET';
PARAMETER
VALUE
NLS_CHARACTERSET
UTF8
SQL> select * from nls_session_parameters
2 where parameter = 'NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS';
PARAMETER
VALUE
NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS
BYTE
Please suggest me on below:
(1) Is this problem because of multicharacter set?
(2) If so, Can I ask my DBA to ask Oracle to fix this problem? Or is my requirements is not genuine?
Please suggest me up on my course of action.
Thank you.

Higher version ASO to Low verion

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for