Hostname length Restriction in 11gR2 ?

Hi all,
Is there any hostname length restriction in 11gR2? As there was
restriction of max 8 characters in earlier releases
Health Check Alert: The hostname should be 8 characters or less in
length (Doc ID 957443.1)

I'm planning to installa Grid Infrastructure + Database... do you have both GI and DB on this host?

Similar Messages

  • Problem with the field length restrictions in the WSDL file

    Hi all,
    We have created a XSD file where we have defined fields and given some restrictions (like minLength, maxLength) for each field. See below one ex of one element "Id":
    {code     <xs:simpleType name="Id">
              <xs:restriction base="xs:string">
                   <xs:maxLength value="40"/>
              </xs:restriction>
         </xs:simpleType>
    {code}
    Here we have defined maxLength of this field as 40 chars. Our WSDL uses (refers/import) this XSD file and we ganerates java skeleton using RAD. But at runtime if we set more than 40 chars then also it is accepting. It is not throwing an exception. (In the generated java skeletion these restrictions are not reflected antwhere)
    I have one question that, if such restrictions defined in the XSD file works or not? and is it a industry standard to define restriction in the XSD file?
    If yes then what i need to do more to make it working?
    If not then is there any way to do such validation of the fields that are input to the webservice? Or shall i have to just write my own java class to validate each field?
    Regards,
    Ravi

    Or is it possible that we give length restrictions in the XSD (and import this XSD in WSDL) and generate java skeleton from WSDL then the restrictions defined in XSD are mapped into java classes?
    For ex:
    <xs:simpleType name="Id">
        <xs:restriction base="xs:string">
            <xs:maxLength value="40"/>
        </xs:restriction>
    </xs:simpleType>so when in generated java skeleton we set value to "Id" element which is more than 40 charsthen it should throw a exception?
    Is it possible by default or do we need to write custom validation classes to do validations on such fields?
    Has anybody worked in such scenerios?
    Or how to do field validations in webservice? Simple question.
    Thanks In Advance.

  • Is wpg_docload.download filename length restricted to 78 Characters ?

    All,
    I am using the wpg_docload.download procedure successfully download files. I have encountered a problem when the FILENAME values on the content-disposition attachment tag exceeds 78 characters. Is this a true and limitation of the procedure or have I done something wrong in the construction of my call to the procedure? I have read the threads concerning the upload procedure and noticed filename length restrictions. Do these apply here also ?
    Thanks In Advance,
    Tom
    Edited by: raudabat on Apr 23, 2009 6:38 AM

    Ben,
    Thanks for your reply. My code is very generic in its call to the procedure setting the mime type 'application/pdf' or 'application/ms-excel' and setting the attachment filename parameter. I wouldn't think the results SaveAs filename would have any restrictions in size dealing with directories since it is not allowed to specify the destination directory. My filename is pulled from the database. When I had a filename greater than 78 the wpg_docload function does not do anything or does not raise an error. This really restricts how a user can name there files. I dynamically create PDF and store them into the database using the document title as the filename for the download. However, if I have this limitation, I have to restrict how my user title there documents (or figure how to compress into meaningful titles).
    I have no problem with the download functionality, just the filename length aspect. Hopefully, this can be changed or I will have to live with this limitation. Any insight helpful.
    My site is on a intra-network server.
    Tom

  • Length restriction scan

    Looking for a way to "overcome" the length restriction on the HP DesignJet t1200 MFD when scanning extremely long documents. I believe the device cannot scan a document longer than 104", but I frequently work with documents (roll plans) with lengths exceeding 20 ft. Can anyone help?

    Hi @TheKarlBear  ,
    To get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums since this is a commercial product. You can do this at Commercial Forums.
    Here is a link to your product to start your search.
    Thanks.
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom to say “Thanks” for helping!

  • Can I remove the length restriction on YouTube videos?  YouTube no longer has this restriction.

    Can I remove the length restriction on YouTube videos?  YouTube no longer has this restriction.

    Welcome to the forum.
    As John T. points out, PrE was written when YouTube had restrictions of 10 min., and then they added Extended Subscriptions, and then lifted Duration limits.
    The instructions in that thread, to which John T. linked, will tell you how to Share/Publish from PrE, to then manually upload via your YouTube/Google account. I would guess that with PrE 12 (probably due in Oct. 2013?), the direct PrE to YouTube uploading will reflect the YouTube specifications - unless YouTube changes the game, after it is written.
    I doubt that there will be an update for PrE, just to reflect changes in YouTube, based on the history of the limited PrE updates. IIRC, PrE 3.0 got an update for Windows Vista, which was released, just after PrE 3.0 was, and the 2 updates for PrE 8, that fixed some pretty major Bugs. I do not recall any other PrE updates.
    Good luck,
    Hunt

  • Length restriction on literal value for constant defined declaratively

    When defining a program data item which is a constant varchar2(120) - I am restricted to a default value of length 60 (about 50 short of requirements). Does any one know why this length restriction is applied. Is there an intention to remove this limitation?

    1. In Forms 6i, there is a limit of 255 characters on the FORMS60_PATH. The
    forms runtime crashes, if the length becomes 256 characters or more.
    This is documented in Note 125007.1 Access Violation in Ora805.dll Caused By
    Forms When Forms60_path Longer Than 255 Chars
    2. In Forms 9i/10g, the limitation is 511 characters. If FORMS90_PATH contains
    512 or more characters, it is ignored. ORACLE_HOME cannot be more than 39 characters long.
    3. In Forms 10.1.2, the limit has been increased, that is, FORMS_PATH length has been doubled (1024).
    The new limit for ORACLE_HOME is 68 characters.
    A workaround
    Set ORACLE_PATH
    Regards

  • Field length restrictions - any workaround possible?

    Ladies and gents,
    Here is a question for which I would love to get some feedback.
    In an ongoing project, i'm migrating from a legacy system that has document numbers longer than 30 characters. I'm looking to see whether you have any suggestions as how to handle this in SAP.
    My ideas are either around extending the document number, but that really does not appeal to my and i dont think it is feasible.
    The other idea was if there was some way of extending the length of characteristics. Why anybody in SAP thought the longest meta-data you would need is 30 characters it beyond me though.
    The last option, that could work is to add an include to table DRAW, and change the original screens to include the new field(s) added.
    So anybody with similar experiences, either successes or failures, please come forward.
    As always, points will be given etc etc.
    Regards,
    Espen Leknes
    Edited by: Espen Leknes on Feb 28, 2008 2:49 PM

    Hi Espen,
    from SAP point of view I can only tell you that this restriction is due to the field definition of table DRAW. I never came accross a system where this field was increased to more than 30 characters.
    As this is defined on database level I'm not sure if this really works as the document number is used to create the document key for several different other functionalities like object links.
    Best regards,
    Christoph

  • Model name length restrictions

    Using trial and error with the Oracle-Jena adaptor, I seem to have discovered an upper limit of 25 characters on the length of RDF model names that Oracle will let you create. Can somebody verify this for me? If so, I'm curious as to why 25 was chosen. Is that an arbitrary length chosen in the Java code, or is it a restriction imposed by the database itself? Is that length hard-coded, or is it configurable in any way?

    It is imposed by the database. It is not configurable. Database has a limit of 30 bytes. Internally, we need to use a few bytes ourselves (as suffix etc). So you are seeing 25.
    Thanks,
    Zhe Wu

  • Field length restriction

    Hi Experts,
    I am uploading some customer witht the help of BAPI  BAPI_BUPA_FS_CREATE_FROM_DATA2.
    While uploadig the customer , I am getting a Warning message  " The use of last 5 character in field NAME1 is restricted (>35 to 40) "
    Message type 'W' ,   ID - 'AM' ,   No -'228'.
    This warning is coming because the length of field NAME1 is 40 character.We want to eliminate this warning
    Can anyone give suggestion where this check is maintained.
    Help will be appreciated.
    Regards
    Sourabh

    Hi Sourabh,
    Please refer OSS Note No. 777639
    Please find points useful for you from the note.
    Please reward points if helpful.
    The wrong field is used for the mapping: The Outbound Idoc CREMDM and DEBMDM contain both the name fields from the Address management ( 40 characters long) and from the Master data itself (35 characters long)Due to historical reasons the fields are saved in these 2 places redundantly.
    During XI XSLT mapping to the MDS the fields were taken from the Master data and not from the Address
    management.
    Solution
    Change of the XSLT mapping: pick the name fields from the Address fields and not from the master data fields.
    Regards,
    Deepak

  • Character Length restrictions in BW

    Dear BW Experts,
    We are getting data from an external source. We have a field whose length is more than 60. I am unable to bring this field in to BW since BW has the restriction of not more than 60 character length. I cannot split the field since it is like a comment field.
    Could you tell me if there are other ways of getting such data in to BW where the length is more than 60 say like 500 or 1000 in length.
    Thanks,
    Sai

    Hi Sai,
    As we all know maximum length of info object is 60.The only way to get the data more than 60 is create another info object and add this as attributes to the base info object and make this attributes as display attributes.
    check the below blog, you have clear explanation
    /people/sap.user72/blog/2006/05/27/long-texts-in-sap-bw-modeling
    Regards,
    Venkatesh

  • ASA DHCP Request incorrect hostname length

    I have an ASA 5505 with software version  8.2(1). It is making DHCP  requests for IPSec clients that connect to the ASA. The DHCP requests  packets the ASA makes have an extra '00' appended to the hostname field,  and the length field is the size of the hostname + 1.
    The DHCP server  is Microsoft Server 2003 and this causes the hostname to be registered  with an unknown character which appears as []hostname. Then when server  2003 tries to update the DNS record, it fails because of the invalid  character in the hostname.
    Is there anyway to have the ASA have the  correct length for the hostname field in the DHCP packet, or a  workaround that will solve this problem?

    I am thinking it may not be option 12 in the DHCP packet, but option 81.  I have included a portion of the DHCP request from the ASA below:
       Option: (t=53,l=1) DHCP Message Type = DHCP Request
            Option: (53) DHCP Message Type
            Length: 1
            Value: 03
        Option: (t=57,l=2) Maximum DHCP Message Size = 1152
            Option: (57) Maximum DHCP Message Size
            Length: 2
            Value: 0480
        Option: (t=61,l=42) Client identifier
            Option: (61) Client identifier
            Length: 42
            Value: 00636973636F2D303032312E353537352E636131372D6D79...
        Option: (t=54,l=4) Server Identifier = 192.168.8.3
            Option: (54) Server Identifier
            Length: 4
            Value: C0A80803
        Option: (t=50,l=4) Requested IP Address = 192.168.8.105
            Option: (50) Requested IP Address
            Length: 4
            Value: C0A80869
        Option: (t=12,l=11) Host Name = "myhostname"
            Option: (12) Host Name
            Length: 11
            Value: 6D79686F73746E616D6500
        Option: (t=51,l=4) IP Address Lease Time = 8 days
            Option: (51) IP Address Lease Time
            Length: 4
            Value: 000A8C00
        Option: (t=55,l=6) Parameter Request List
            Option: (55) Parameter Request List
            Length: 6
            Value: 01060F2C0321
            1 = Subnet Mask
            6 = Domain Name Server
            15 = Domain Name
            44 = NetBIOS over TCP/IP Name Server
            3 = Router
            33 = Static Route
        Option: (t=81,l=14) Client Fully Qualified Domain Name
            Option: (81) Client Fully Qualified Domain Name
            Length: 14
            Value: 0400000A6D79686F73746E616D65
            Flags: 0x04
            0000 .... = Reserved flags: 0x00
            .... 0... = Server DDNS: Some server updates
            .... .1.. = Encoding: Binary encoding
            .... ..0. = Server overrides: No override
            .... ...0 = Server: Client
            A-RR result: 0
            PTR-RR result: 0
            Client name: 0A6D79686F73746E616D65
        End Option
        Padding
    Notice in option 81 the Client Name has a leading binary value of 0A (which is a new line):  0A6D79686F73746E616D65.
    Does CSCsz07757 relate to that?  Is there a way to have the ASA not include option 81 as part of the DHCP requests it makes?
    Thank you.

  • Field length restrictions

    Hello,
    I have a postal code field that is currently restricted to 7 characters including a space. The format is A0A0A0 and the program will automatically put the space in the middle when the user tabs over.  I want the user to enter only 6 characters but If i put that restriction in, it hides one of the letters as it it counts the space as one of the 6 characters.  If I change it to allow 7 characters, then the user can enter the whole 7 characters, but I only want them to enter 6 plus still allow for a space. Does this make sense?

    Thank you for your response radzmar. Below is what I have in the exit event currently. So I tried what you suggested by going to paterns but it is still not working for me.
    if (!(this.isNull)) {
      var str = this.rawValue;
      if (str.length != 6) {
        xfa.host.messageBox("Please enter a six character postal code in the format A9A9A9.");
      else {
        var regExp = /^([R]\d[A-Z]\d[A-Z]\d)$/i;
        if (regExp.test(str)) {
          str = str.toUpperCase();
          this.rawValue = str.substring(0,3) + " " + str.substring(3,6);
        else {
          xfa.host.messageBox("Please enter the postal code in the format A9A9A9, where the postal code must begin with R.");

  • Username length restriction (uid attribute)?

    Does anyone here know if there's an explicit restriction for the length of the "uid" attribute?
    I have some engineers here with crazy long names (12+ chars) and I'd like to avoid truncating if at all possible. How's everyone handle this?
    Patrick

    I've actually created usernames that are huge (think every key on the keyboard), and people can seem to log in properly, but I am more thinking of whether there are other restrictions, maybe OS-specific that might cause problems.
    I know there have historically been problems with Samba and Windows, but I'm not using those right now and don't plan to (for the near term, anyway), but if there are any restrictions that I'm not aware of with Solaris 8, 9 or 10, I'd love to hear about them so I can plan.
    Patrick

  • Removing Length Restrictions in iDVD (Burning disk larger then 5GB)

    Hi Ho all, i'm at my wits end here, i have been creating a dvd for my sisters friend her wedding, after finally completing everything but the dvd part i was really surprised when i went to save image it says "Your project exceeds the maximum content duration. To burn this project, remove some content."
    Let me first off by saying how disapointed of mac for putting this restriction on the software, i really need to get this lifted because the stuff is about 1.28GB thats the media but in iDVD it shows as 5.1GB. and it won't allow me to make any changes. Has someone made a hack for this or found a way around, because if i can save it as an image then i can use DVD2oneX and shrink it.
    Cheers for all your help, im off to bed it's 5:05AM now, lol
    [email protected] - if there is a solution please reply to this or email me, thanks

    DVD Studio Pro, with Compressor, gives you more compression options. Particulary the ability to endcode AC3 audio which frees up space. Mind you, it is now only packaged with Final Cut Studio ... and that runs around 1,300 Cdn right now.
    Also, there are some logical restrictions to how much video you can cram onto a single layer DVD. Even using Compressor to squeeze, say, 3 hours onto a single layer disk, you are knocking the numbers to the point where the quality is going to be affected.
    In iDVD, when you have a project that is just shy of the two hour mark, you can definitely have some quality issues. Studio Pro gives you more options but as stated, not a price for the faint hearted.
    And 80 bucks for Toast is a great deal. Although I use iDVD and DVD Studio Pro for my "movies" Toast is, in my humble opinion, a valuable DVD/CD creation tool

  • Regular Expressions with Unicode Strings - length restriction?

    Hi,
    I can't quite figure this one out. I am checking a String for the presence of a URL.. more specifically, a jpg or gif URL.
    Anyway, the following reg exp will work fine for me. However, when testing with unicode data (chinese text) the expression will only work up to a certain string length. Here's an example:
    boolean isURL = text.matches(".*http\\S*(jpg|gif).*");
    My thought is that since Unicode data takes up more space, there a limitation to dealing with Strings. Does anyone know what that number is? Or, is there another reason the reg exp fails??
    thanks,
    joe
    Example::
    This works for any length String I throw at it using standard ASCII text.. But a unicode string of a certain length won't recognize the URL (I doubt I can simply paste my example here and have it turn out correctly..)
    DOESN'T WORK: (length is reported via text.length() as 344
    "FWD: test_tancy: FWD: tancy: FWD: supporter:
    &#27973;&#28129;&#33394;&#24425;&#36896;&#28165;&#20937;
    &#35201;&#35753;&#23621;&#25152;&#30475;&#36215;&#26469;&#28165;&#29245;&#20937;&#24555;&#65292;&#21487;&#37319;&#29992;&#20197;&#30333;&#33394;&#20026;&#20027;&#35843;&#30340;&#24067;&#32622;&#12290;&#30333;&#33394;&#19981;&#20294;&#33021;&#22686;&#21152;&#31354;&#38388;&#24863;&#65292;&#36824;&#33021;&#33829;&#36896;&#26126;&#24555;&#23425;&#38745;&#30340;&#27668;&#27675;&#65292;&#35753;&#20154;&#24773;&#32490;&#31283;&#23450;&#12290;&#21478;&#22806;&#65292;&#26377;&#24847;&#35782;&#22320;&#22686;&#28155;&#19968;&#28857;&#20919;&#33394;&#65292;&#20063;&#33021;&#20196;&#20154;&#22312;&#35270;&#35273;&#19978;&#35273;&#24471;&#30021;&#24555;&#12290;&#19981;&#36807;&#65292;&#19968;&#38388;&#25151;&#20869;&#33509;&#20840;&#37096;&#20351;&#29992;&#20919;&#33394;&#65292;&#25110;&#20840;&#37096;&#37319;&#29992;&#26262;&#33394;&#65292;&#20250;&#20351;&#20154;&#24863;&#21040;&#19981;&#23433;&#12290;&#26368;&#22909;&#26159;&#30830;&#23450;&#20027;&#33394;&#21518;&#65292;&#23567;&#38754;&#31215;&#20351;&#29992;&#20123;&#21576;&#40092;&#26126;&#23545;&#27604;&#30340;&#33394;&#24425;&#12290;&#20837;&#22799;&#36141;&#32622;&#19968;&#20123;&#33394;&#35843;&#28165;&#20937;&#30340;&#39280;&#29289;&#25670;&#35774;&#65292;&#26159;&#26368;&#30465;&#38065;&#26377;&#25928;&#30340;&#19968;&#25307;&#65292;&#22914;&#20026;&#21488;&#28783;&#25442;&#20010;&#30333;&#33394;&#28783;&#32617;&#12289;&#22312;&#27927;&#25163;&#38388;&#25918;&#19968;&#22871;&#20912;&#34013;&#33394;&#30340;&#27792;&#28020;&#29992;&#20855;&#31561;&#12290;(UU&#20026;&#24744;&#25552;&#20379;&#29983;&#27963;&#21672;&#35759;&#24182;&#31069;&#24744;&#29983;&#27963;&#24841;&#24555;&#65281;&#22914;&#19981;&#24076;&#26395;&#25171;&#25200;&#35831;&#22238;&#22797;?NO?)http://www.blah.com/servlet/mailbox?item=fc-10Tq9aljw0w9.jpg"
    WORKS: (length is reported via text.length() as 296
    "FWD: Joe: &#35201;&#35753;&#23621;&#25152;&#30475;&#36215;&#26469;&#28165;&#29245;&#20937;&#24555;&#65292;&#21487;&#37319;&#29992;&#20197;&#30333;&#33394;&#20026;&#20027;&#35843;&#30340;&#24067;&#32622;&#12290;&#30333;&#33394;&#19981;&#20294;&#33021;&#22686;&#21152;&#31354;&#38388;&#24863;&#65292;&#36824;&#33021;&#33829;&#36896;&#26126;&#24555;&#23425;&#38745;&#30340;&#27668;&#27675;&#65292;&#35753;&#20154;&#24773;&#32490;&#31283;&#23450;&#12290;&#21478;&#22806;&#65292;&#26377;&#24847;&#35782;&#22320;&#22686;&#28155;&#19968;&#28857;&#20919;&#33394;&#65292;&#20063;&#33021;&#20196;&#20154;&#22312;&#35270;&#35273;&#19978;&#35273;&#24471;&#30021;&#24555;&#12290;&#19981;&#36807;&#65292;&#19968;&#38388;&#25151;&#20869;&#33509;&#20840;&#37096;&#20351;&#29992;&#20919;&#33394;&#65292;&#25110;&#20840;&#37096;&#37319;&#29992;&#26262;&#33394;&#65292;&#20250;&#20351;&#20154;&#24863;&#21040;&#19981;&#23433;&#12290;&#26368;&#22909;&#26159;&#30830;&#23450;&#20027;&#33394;&#21518;&#65292;&#23567;&#38754;&#31215;&#20351;&#29992;&#20123;&#21576;&#40092;&#26126;&#23545;&#27604;&#30340;&#33394;&#24425;&#12290;&#20837;&#22799;&#36141;&#32622;&#19968;&#20123;&#33394;&#35843;&#28165;&#20937;&#30340;&#39280;&#29289;&#25670;&#35774;&#65292;&#26159;&#26368;&#30465;&#38065;&#26377;&#25928;&#30340;&#19968;&#25307;&#65292;&#22914;&#20026;&#21488;&#28783;&#25442;&#20010;&#30333;&#33394;&#28783;&#32617;&#12289;&#22312;&#27927;&#25163;&#38388;&#25918;&#19968;&#22871;&#20912;&#34013;&#33394;&#30340;&#27792;&#28020;&#29992;&#20855;&#31561;&#12290;(UU&#20026;&#24744;&#25552;&#20379;&#29983;&#27963;&#21672;&#35759;&#24182;&#31069;&#24744;&#29983;&#27963;&#24841;&#24555;&#65281;&#22914;&#19981;&#24076;&#26395;&#25171;&#25200;&#35831;&#22238;&#22797;?NO?)http://www.blah.com/servlet/mailbox?item=fc-10Tq9aljw0w9.jpg"

    Perhaps you should check the version of Java you are using. I am using 1.4.2_04
    public class A {
        public static void main(String[] args) throws UnsupportedEncodingException {
            String text = "FWD: test_tancy: FWD: tancy: FWD: supporter:                   " +
                    new String(new char[]{(char) 35201, (char) 35753, (char) 23621, (char) 25152, (char) 30475, (char) 36215,
                                          (char) 26469, (char) 28165, (char) 29245, (char) 20937, (char) 24555, (char) 65292,
                                          (char) 21487, (char) 37319, (char) 29992, (char) 20197, (char) 30333, (char) 33394,
                                          (char) 20026, (char) 20027, (char) 35843, (char) 30340, (char) 24067, (char) 32622,
                                          (char) 12290, (char) 30333, (char) 33394, (char) 19981, (char) 20294, (char) 33021,
                                          (char) 22686, (char) 21152, (char) 31354, (char) 38388, (char) 24863, (char) 65292,
                                          (char) 36824, (char) 33021, (char) 33829, (char) 36896, (char) 26126, (char) 24555,
                                          (char) 23425, (char) 38745, (char) 30340, (char) 27668, (char) 27675, (char) 65292,
                                          (char) 35753, (char) 20154, (char) 24773, (char) 32490, (char) 31283, (char) 23450,
                                          (char) 12290, (char) 21478, (char) 22806, (char) 65292, (char) 26377, (char) 24847,
                                          (char) 35782, (char) 22320, (char) 22686, (char) 28155, (char) 19968, (char) 28857,
                                          (char) 20919, (char) 33394, (char) 65292, (char) 20063, (char) 33021, (char) 20196,
                                          (char) 20154, (char) 22312, (char) 35270, (char) 35273, (char) 19978, (char) 35273,
                                          (char) 24471, (char) 30021, (char) 24555, (char) 12290, (char) 19981, (char) 36807,
                                          (char) 65292, (char) 19968, (char) 38388, (char) 25151, (char) 20869, (char) 33509,
                                          (char) 20840, (char) 37096, (char) 20351, (char) 29992, (char) 20919, (char) 33394,
                                          (char) 65292, (char) 25110, (char) 20840, (char) 37096, (char) 37319, (char) 29992,
                                          (char) 26262, (char) 33394, (char) 65292, (char) 20250, (char) 20351, (char) 20154,
                                          (char) 24863, (char) 21040, (char) 19981, (char) 23433, (char) 12290, (char) 26368,
                                          (char) 22909, (char) 26159, (char) 30830, (char) 23450, (char) 20027, (char) 33394,
                                          (char) 21518, (char) 65292, (char) 23567, (char) 38754, (char) 31215, (char) 20351,
                                          (char) 29992, (char) 20123, (char) 21576, (char) 40092, (char) 26126, (char) 23545,
                                          (char) 27604, (char) 30340, (char) 33394, (char) 24425, (char) 12290, (char) 20837,
                                          (char) 22799, (char) 36141, (char) 32622, (char) 19968, (char) 20123, (char) 33394,
                                          (char) 35843, (char) 28165, (char) 20937, (char) 30340, (char) 39280, (char) 29289,
                                          (char) 25670, (char) 35774, (char) 65292, (char) 26159, (char) 26368, (char) 30465,
                                          (char) 38065, (char) 26377, (char) 25928, (char) 30340, (char) 19968, (char) 25307,
                                          (char) 65292, (char) 22914, (char) 20026, (char) 21488, (char) 28783, (char) 25442,
                                          (char) 20010, (char) 30333, (char) 33394, (char) 28783, (char) 32617, (char) 12289,
                                          (char) 22312, (char) 27927, (char) 25163, (char) 38388, (char) 25918, (char) 19968,
                                          (char) 22871, (char) 20912, (char) 34013, (char) 33394, (char) 30340, (char) 27792,
                                          (char) 28020, (char) 29992, (char) 20855, (char) 31561, (char) 12290, (char) 20026,
                                          (char) 24744, (char) 25552, (char) 20379, (char) 29983, (char) 27963, (char) 21672,
                                          (char) 35759, (char) 24182, (char) 31069, (char) 24744, (char) 29983, (char) 27963,
                                          (char) 24841, (char) 24555, (char) 65281, (char) 22914, (char) 19981, (char) 24076,
                                          (char) 26395, (char) 25171, (char) 25200, (char) 35831, (char) 22238, (char) 22797}) +
                    "?NO?)http://www.blah.com/servlet/mailbox?item=fc-10Tq9aljw0w9.jpg";
            boolean isURL = text.matches(".*http\\S*(jpg|gif).*");
            System.out.println("isURL="+isURL+", length="+text.length());
    }Prints
    isURL=true, length=344

Maybe you are looking for

  • Your Experience with RSSM / compatibility mode in BW 3.X ?

    Hi Folks, we have a dozen of InfoObjects referencing 0costcenter. These Objects are used in several InfoProviders and queries. We also have more than 500 authorizations definitions for hierarchies, at the time being defined on 0costcenter. This all w

  • Soap attachment in jaxws

    hi i am trying to add an attachment to a soap message . im using jaxws2.0 and this is a snippet of my code.. public boolean handleMessage (SOAPMessageContext messageContext) {           boolean request = ((Boolean) messageContext.get(SOAPMessageConte

  • Waking up ncWaitForS​tate

    Hello, i have a problem with my application after updating from nican 1.6 to nican 2.1.2. To receive CAN messages, i start a thread and wait with ncWaitForState. Now, if i want to stop this thread, i send NC_ST_STOP with ncAction, and ncWaitForState

  • Org Unit to Cost center relationship issue

    Hi All, When I assign a Cost center to an Org Unit, i dont have any issues and got created. But when I assign the same Cost center to a different Org Unit, it delimits the previous Org relationship and creates the new one. I checked the Relationship

  • Printing Problem in 6i

    Hi, I am facing a problem in printing from Reports 6i. We are using shared Laser Printer HP 4100 N. If i print report using this printer then 6i given General Page Fault (GPF) and comes out of program. Can anybody help me in resolving the issue. This