Length restriction scan

Looking for a way to "overcome" the length restriction on the HP DesignJet t1200 MFD when scanning extremely long documents. I believe the device cannot scan a document longer than 104", but I frequently work with documents (roll plans) with lengths exceeding 20 ft. Can anyone help?

Hi @TheKarlBear ,
To get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums since this is a commercial product. You can do this at Commercial Forums.
Here is a link to your product to start your search.
Thanks.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom to say “Thanks” for helping!

Similar Messages

Problem with the field length restrictions in the WSDL file

Hi all,
We have created a XSD file where we have defined fields and given some restrictions (like minLength, maxLength) for each field. See below one ex of one element "Id":
{code     <xs:simpleType name="Id">
          <xs:restriction base="xs:string">
               <xs:maxLength value="40"/>
          </xs:restriction>
     </xs:simpleType>
{code}
Here we have defined maxLength of this field as 40 chars. Our WSDL uses (refers/import) this XSD file and we ganerates java skeleton using RAD. But at runtime if we set more than 40 chars then also it is accepting. It is not throwing an exception. (In the generated java skeletion these restrictions are not reflected antwhere)
I have one question that, if such restrictions defined in the XSD file works or not? and is it a industry standard to define restriction in the XSD file?
If yes then what i need to do more to make it working?
If not then is there any way to do such validation of the fields that are input to the webservice? Or shall i have to just write my own java class to validate each field?
Regards,
Ravi

Or is it possible that we give length restrictions in the XSD (and import this XSD in WSDL) and generate java skeleton from WSDL then the restrictions defined in XSD are mapped into java classes?
For ex:
<xs:simpleType name="Id">
    <xs:restriction base="xs:string">
        <xs:maxLength value="40"/>
    </xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>so when in generated java skeleton we set value to "Id" element which is more than 40 charsthen it should throw a exception?
Is it possible by default or do we need to write custom validation classes to do validations on such fields?
Has anybody worked in such scenerios?
Or how to do field validations in webservice? Simple question.
Thanks In Advance.

Is wpg_docload.download filename length restricted to 78 Characters ?

All,
I am using the wpg_docload.download procedure successfully download files. I have encountered a problem when the FILENAME values on the content-disposition attachment tag exceeds 78 characters. Is this a true and limitation of the procedure or have I done something wrong in the construction of my call to the procedure? I have read the threads concerning the upload procedure and noticed filename length restrictions. Do these apply here also ?
Thanks In Advance,
Tom
Edited by: raudabat on Apr 23, 2009 6:38 AM

Ben,
Thanks for your reply. My code is very generic in its call to the procedure setting the mime type 'application/pdf' or 'application/ms-excel' and setting the attachment filename parameter. I wouldn't think the results SaveAs filename would have any restrictions in size dealing with directories since it is not allowed to specify the destination directory. My filename is pulled from the database. When I had a filename greater than 78 the wpg_docload function does not do anything or does not raise an error. This really restricts how a user can name there files. I dynamically create PDF and store them into the database using the document title as the filename for the download. However, if I have this limitation, I have to restrict how my user title there documents (or figure how to compress into meaningful titles).
I have no problem with the download functionality, just the filename length aspect. Hopefully, this can be changed or I will have to live with this limitation. Any insight helpful.
My site is on a intra-network server.
Tom

Can I remove the length restriction on YouTube videos? YouTube no longer has this restriction.

Can I remove the length restriction on YouTube videos? YouTube no longer has this restriction.

Welcome to the forum.
As John T. points out, PrE was written when YouTube had restrictions of 10 min., and then they added Extended Subscriptions, and then lifted Duration limits.
The instructions in that thread, to which John T. linked, will tell you how to Share/Publish from PrE, to then manually upload via your YouTube/Google account. I would guess that with PrE 12 (probably due in Oct. 2013?), the direct PrE to YouTube uploading will reflect the YouTube specifications - unless YouTube changes the game, after it is written.
I doubt that there will be an update for PrE, just to reflect changes in YouTube, based on the history of the limited PrE updates. IIRC, PrE 3.0 got an update for Windows Vista, which was released, just after PrE 3.0 was, and the 2 updates for PrE 8, that fixed some pretty major Bugs. I do not recall any other PrE updates.
Good luck,
Hunt

Length restriction on literal value for constant defined declaratively

When defining a program data item which is a constant varchar2(120) - I am restricted to a default value of length 60 (about 50 short of requirements). Does any one know why this length restriction is applied. Is there an intention to remove this limitation?

1. In Forms 6i, there is a limit of 255 characters on the FORMS60_PATH. The
forms runtime crashes, if the length becomes 256 characters or more.
This is documented in Note 125007.1 Access Violation in Ora805.dll Caused By
Forms When Forms60_path Longer Than 255 Chars
2. In Forms 9i/10g, the limitation is 511 characters. If FORMS90_PATH contains
512 or more characters, it is ignored. ORACLE_HOME cannot be more than 39 characters long.
3. In Forms 10.1.2, the limit has been increased, that is, FORMS_PATH length has been doubled (1024).
The new limit for ORACLE_HOME is 68 characters.
A workaround
Set ORACLE_PATH
Regards

Hostname length Restriction in 11gR2 ?

Hi all,
Is there any hostname length restriction in 11gR2? As there was
restriction of max 8 characters in earlier releases
Health Check Alert: The hostname should be 8 characters or less in
length (Doc ID 957443.1)

I'm planning to installa Grid Infrastructure + Database... do you have both GI and DB on this host?

Field length restrictions - any workaround possible?

Ladies and gents,
Here is a question for which I would love to get some feedback.
In an ongoing project, i'm migrating from a legacy system that has document numbers longer than 30 characters. I'm looking to see whether you have any suggestions as how to handle this in SAP.
My ideas are either around extending the document number, but that really does not appeal to my and i dont think it is feasible.
The other idea was if there was some way of extending the length of characteristics. Why anybody in SAP thought the longest meta-data you would need is 30 characters it beyond me though.
The last option, that could work is to add an include to table DRAW, and change the original screens to include the new field(s) added.
So anybody with similar experiences, either successes or failures, please come forward.
As always, points will be given etc etc.
Regards,
Espen Leknes
Edited by: Espen Leknes on Feb 28, 2008 2:49 PM

Hi Espen,
from SAP point of view I can only tell you that this restriction is due to the field definition of table DRAW. I never came accross a system where this field was increased to more than 30 characters.
As this is defined on database level I'm not sure if this really works as the document number is used to create the document key for several different other functionalities like object links.
Best regards,
Christoph

Model name length restrictions

Using trial and error with the Oracle-Jena adaptor, I seem to have discovered an upper limit of 25 characters on the length of RDF model names that Oracle will let you create. Can somebody verify this for me? If so, I'm curious as to why 25 was chosen. Is that an arbitrary length chosen in the Java code, or is it a restriction imposed by the database itself? Is that length hard-coded, or is it configurable in any way?

It is imposed by the database. It is not configurable. Database has a limit of 30 bytes. Internally, we need to use a few bytes ourselves (as suffix etc). So you are seeing 25.
Thanks,
Zhe Wu

Field length restriction

Hi Experts,
I am uploading some customer witht the help of BAPI BAPI_BUPA_FS_CREATE_FROM_DATA2.
While uploadig the customer , I am getting a Warning message " The use of last 5 character in field NAME1 is restricted (>35 to 40) "
Message type 'W' , ID - 'AM' , No -'228'.
This warning is coming because the length of field NAME1 is 40 character.We want to eliminate this warning
Can anyone give suggestion where this check is maintained.
Help will be appreciated.
Regards
Sourabh

Hi Sourabh,
Please refer OSS Note No. 777639
Please find points useful for you from the note.
Please reward points if helpful.
The wrong field is used for the mapping: The Outbound Idoc CREMDM and DEBMDM contain both the name fields from the Address management ( 40 characters long) and from the Master data itself (35 characters long)Due to historical reasons the fields are saved in these 2 places redundantly.
During XI XSLT mapping to the MDS the fields were taken from the Master data and not from the Address
management.
Solution
Change of the XSLT mapping: pick the name fields from the Address fields and not from the master data fields.
Regards,
Deepak

Character Length restrictions in BW

Dear BW Experts,
We are getting data from an external source. We have a field whose length is more than 60. I am unable to bring this field in to BW since BW has the restriction of not more than 60 character length. I cannot split the field since it is like a comment field.
Could you tell me if there are other ways of getting such data in to BW where the length is more than 60 say like 500 or 1000 in length.
Thanks,
Sai

Hi Sai,
As we all know maximum length of info object is 60.The only way to get the data more than 60 is create another info object and add this as attributes to the base info object and make this attributes as display attributes.
check the below blog, you have clear explanation
/people/sap.user72/blog/2006/05/27/long-texts-in-sap-bw-modeling
Regards,
Venkatesh

Field length restrictions

Hello,
I have a postal code field that is currently restricted to 7 characters including a space. The format is A0A0A0 and the program will automatically put the space in the middle when the user tabs over. I want the user to enter only 6 characters but If i put that restriction in, it hides one of the letters as it it counts the space as one of the 6 characters. If I change it to allow 7 characters, then the user can enter the whole 7 characters, but I only want them to enter 6 plus still allow for a space. Does this make sense?

Thank you for your response radzmar. Below is what I have in the exit event currently. So I tried what you suggested by going to paterns but it is still not working for me.
if (!(this.isNull)) {
var str = this.rawValue;
if (str.length != 6) {
    xfa.host.messageBox("Please enter a six character postal code in the format A9A9A9.");
else {
    var regExp = /^([R]\d[A-Z]\d[A-Z]\d)$/i;
    if (regExp.test(str)) {
      str = str.toUpperCase();
      this.rawValue = str.substring(0,3) + " " + str.substring(3,6);
    else {
      xfa.host.messageBox("Please enter the postal code in the format A9A9A9, where the postal code must begin with R.");

Username length restriction (uid attribute)?

Does anyone here know if there's an explicit restriction for the length of the "uid" attribute?
I have some engineers here with crazy long names (12+ chars) and I'd like to avoid truncating if at all possible. How's everyone handle this?
Patrick

I've actually created usernames that are huge (think every key on the keyboard), and people can seem to log in properly, but I am more thinking of whether there are other restrictions, maybe OS-specific that might cause problems.
I know there have historically been problems with Samba and Windows, but I'm not using those right now and don't plan to (for the near term, anyway), but if there are any restrictions that I'm not aware of with Solaris 8, 9 or 10, I'd love to hear about them so I can plan.
Patrick

Removing Length Restrictions in iDVD (Burning disk larger then 5GB)

Hi Ho all, i'm at my wits end here, i have been creating a dvd for my sisters friend her wedding, after finally completing everything but the dvd part i was really surprised when i went to save image it says "Your project exceeds the maximum content duration. To burn this project, remove some content."
Let me first off by saying how disapointed of mac for putting this restriction on the software, i really need to get this lifted because the stuff is about 1.28GB thats the media but in iDVD it shows as 5.1GB. and it won't allow me to make any changes. Has someone made a hack for this or found a way around, because if i can save it as an image then i can use DVD2oneX and shrink it.
Cheers for all your help, im off to bed it's 5:05AM now, lol
[email protected] - if there is a solution please reply to this or email me, thanks

DVD Studio Pro, with Compressor, gives you more compression options. Particulary the ability to endcode AC3 audio which frees up space. Mind you, it is now only packaged with Final Cut Studio ... and that runs around 1,300 Cdn right now.
Also, there are some logical restrictions to how much video you can cram onto a single layer DVD. Even using Compressor to squeeze, say, 3 hours onto a single layer disk, you are knocking the numbers to the point where the quality is going to be affected.
In iDVD, when you have a project that is just shy of the two hour mark, you can definitely have some quality issues. Studio Pro gives you more options but as stated, not a price for the faint hearted.
And 80 bucks for Toast is a great deal. Although I use iDVD and DVD Studio Pro for my "movies" Toast is, in my humble opinion, a valuable DVD/CD creation tool

Regular Expressions with Unicode Strings - length restriction?

Hi,
I can't quite figure this one out. I am checking a String for the presence of a URL.. more specifically, a jpg or gif URL.
Anyway, the following reg exp will work fine for me. However, when testing with unicode data (chinese text) the expression will only work up to a certain string length. Here's an example:
boolean isURL = text.matches(".*http\\S*(jpg|gif).*");
My thought is that since Unicode data takes up more space, there a limitation to dealing with Strings. Does anyone know what that number is? Or, is there another reason the reg exp fails??
thanks,
joe
Example::
This works for any length String I throw at it using standard ASCII text.. But a unicode string of a certain length won't recognize the URL (I doubt I can simply paste my example here and have it turn out correctly..)
DOESN'T WORK: (length is reported via text.length() as 344
"FWD: test_tancy: FWD: tancy: FWD: supporter:
浅淡色彩造清凉
要让居所看起来清爽凉快，可采用以白色为主调的布置。白色不但能增加空间感，还能营造明快宁静的气氛，让人情绪稳定。另外，有意识地增添一点冷色，也能令人在视觉上觉得畅快。不过，一间房内若全部使用冷色，或全部采用暖色，会使人感到不安。最好是确定主色后，小面积使用些呈鲜明对比的色彩。入夏购置一些色调清凉的饰物摆设，是最省钱有效的一招，如为台灯换个白色灯罩、在洗手间放一套冰蓝色的沐浴用具等。(UU为您提供生活咨讯并祝您生活愉快！如不希望打扰请回复?NO?)http://www.blah.com/servlet/mailbox?item=fc-10Tq9aljw0w9.jpg"
WORKS: (length is reported via text.length() as 296
"FWD: Joe: 要让居所看起来清爽凉快，可采用以白色为主调的布置。白色不但能增加空间感，还能营造明快宁静的气氛，让人情绪稳定。另外，有意识地增添一点冷色，也能令人在视觉上觉得畅快。不过，一间房内若全部使用冷色，或全部采用暖色，会使人感到不安。最好是确定主色后，小面积使用些呈鲜明对比的色彩。入夏购置一些色调清凉的饰物摆设，是最省钱有效的一招，如为台灯换个白色灯罩、在洗手间放一套冰蓝色的沐浴用具等。(UU为您提供生活咨讯并祝您生活愉快！如不希望打扰请回复?NO?)http://www.blah.com/servlet/mailbox?item=fc-10Tq9aljw0w9.jpg"

Perhaps you should check the version of Java you are using. I am using 1.4.2_04
public class A {
    public static void main(String[] args) throws UnsupportedEncodingException {
        String text = "FWD: test_tancy: FWD: tancy: FWD: supporter:                   " +
                new String(new char[]{(char) 35201, (char) 35753, (char) 23621, (char) 25152, (char) 30475, (char) 36215,
                                      (char) 26469, (char) 28165, (char) 29245, (char) 20937, (char) 24555, (char) 65292,
                                      (char) 21487, (char) 37319, (char) 29992, (char) 20197, (char) 30333, (char) 33394,
                                      (char) 20026, (char) 20027, (char) 35843, (char) 30340, (char) 24067, (char) 32622,
                                      (char) 12290, (char) 30333, (char) 33394, (char) 19981, (char) 20294, (char) 33021,
                                      (char) 22686, (char) 21152, (char) 31354, (char) 38388, (char) 24863, (char) 65292,
                                      (char) 36824, (char) 33021, (char) 33829, (char) 36896, (char) 26126, (char) 24555,
                                      (char) 23425, (char) 38745, (char) 30340, (char) 27668, (char) 27675, (char) 65292,
                                      (char) 35753, (char) 20154, (char) 24773, (char) 32490, (char) 31283, (char) 23450,
                                      (char) 12290, (char) 21478, (char) 22806, (char) 65292, (char) 26377, (char) 24847,
                                      (char) 35782, (char) 22320, (char) 22686, (char) 28155, (char) 19968, (char) 28857,
                                      (char) 20919, (char) 33394, (char) 65292, (char) 20063, (char) 33021, (char) 20196,
                                      (char) 20154, (char) 22312, (char) 35270, (char) 35273, (char) 19978, (char) 35273,
                                      (char) 24471, (char) 30021, (char) 24555, (char) 12290, (char) 19981, (char) 36807,
                                      (char) 65292, (char) 19968, (char) 38388, (char) 25151, (char) 20869, (char) 33509,
                                      (char) 20840, (char) 37096, (char) 20351, (char) 29992, (char) 20919, (char) 33394,
                                      (char) 65292, (char) 25110, (char) 20840, (char) 37096, (char) 37319, (char) 29992,
                                      (char) 26262, (char) 33394, (char) 65292, (char) 20250, (char) 20351, (char) 20154,
                                      (char) 24863, (char) 21040, (char) 19981, (char) 23433, (char) 12290, (char) 26368,
                                      (char) 22909, (char) 26159, (char) 30830, (char) 23450, (char) 20027, (char) 33394,
                                      (char) 21518, (char) 65292, (char) 23567, (char) 38754, (char) 31215, (char) 20351,
                                      (char) 29992, (char) 20123, (char) 21576, (char) 40092, (char) 26126, (char) 23545,
                                      (char) 27604, (char) 30340, (char) 33394, (char) 24425, (char) 12290, (char) 20837,
                                      (char) 22799, (char) 36141, (char) 32622, (char) 19968, (char) 20123, (char) 33394,
                                      (char) 35843, (char) 28165, (char) 20937, (char) 30340, (char) 39280, (char) 29289,
                                      (char) 25670, (char) 35774, (char) 65292, (char) 26159, (char) 26368, (char) 30465,
                                      (char) 38065, (char) 26377, (char) 25928, (char) 30340, (char) 19968, (char) 25307,
                                      (char) 65292, (char) 22914, (char) 20026, (char) 21488, (char) 28783, (char) 25442,
                                      (char) 20010, (char) 30333, (char) 33394, (char) 28783, (char) 32617, (char) 12289,
                                      (char) 22312, (char) 27927, (char) 25163, (char) 38388, (char) 25918, (char) 19968,
                                      (char) 22871, (char) 20912, (char) 34013, (char) 33394, (char) 30340, (char) 27792,
                                      (char) 28020, (char) 29992, (char) 20855, (char) 31561, (char) 12290, (char) 20026,
                                      (char) 24744, (char) 25552, (char) 20379, (char) 29983, (char) 27963, (char) 21672,
                                      (char) 35759, (char) 24182, (char) 31069, (char) 24744, (char) 29983, (char) 27963,
                                      (char) 24841, (char) 24555, (char) 65281, (char) 22914, (char) 19981, (char) 24076,
                                      (char) 26395, (char) 25171, (char) 25200, (char) 35831, (char) 22238, (char) 22797}) +
                "?NO?)http://www.blah.com/servlet/mailbox?item=fc-10Tq9aljw0w9.jpg";
        boolean isURL = text.matches(".*http\\S*(jpg|gif).*");
        System.out.println("isURL="+isURL+", length="+text.length());
}Prints
isURL=true, length=344

WRT400N Won't Accept "/" in blocking URL and has length restrictions

I have a WRT400N that allows for website blocking by URL, only the field won't allow slashes. It is also limited in its field length, but the primary concern is the site. I want to just block one aspect of a site, not the whole site.
Example:
http://www.mysite.com/images/nsfw

Well there is no such option is available on Linksys router wherein you can only block one aspect of a site. But it will allow you to block the complete website.

Length restriction scan

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for