How do I fix 100% packet loss?
I have an 8mb connect but i roughly get like 4-5mb. I think i have the homehub version 1 or 1.5.
When i search for servers on Counter Strike Source and team fortress the whole interenet just resets and no servers found. I posted on the steam forums and they said it wass to do with packet loss.
I tried to test for packet loss on http://freeola.com/line-test/ and it says i have 100% packet loss then i tried on http://pingtest.net/ and it was unable to test for packet loss.
How do i fix 100% packet loss?
matrixrory wrote:
I have an 8mb connect but i roughly get like 4-5mb. I think i have the homehub version 1 or 1.5.
When i search for servers on Counter Strike Source and team fortress the whole interenet just resets and no servers found. I posted on the steam forums and they said it wass to do with packet loss.
I tried to test for packet loss on http://freeola.com/line-test/ and it says i have 100% packet loss then i tried on http://pingtest.net/ and it was unable to test for packet loss.
How do i fix 100% packet loss?
Hi. Welcome to the forums.
I tried both, and the freeola one failed with 100% packet loss, but the pingtest site returned 0% packet loss.
I expect the former is being blocked by firewall/router as expected.
Seems like they aren't quite doing the same thing.
http://www.andyweb.co.uk/shortcuts
http://www.andyweb.co.uk/pictures
Similar Messages
-
Three devices on network: 100% packet loss for my iMac.
I'm having intermittent bouts of 100% packet-loss pinging my router from my iMac, at the same time my iPod touch and neighbor's Windows laptop are surfing wirelessly from the same router.
Sometimes these bouts resolve spontaneously. Otherwise I need to shut down, wait, and restart my iMac to reconnect. The longer the shut down, the longer I can connect it seems.
The problem started a few days ago, after months of trouble-free performance with the same settings. The computer usually stayed up all the time. I hoped in vain today's OSX 10.5.4 and AirPort firmware updates would fix the problem ...
Post 10pm is the most common problem time, 'tho I'm not sure if that's a function of my iMac's uptime (wireless module is cooking?) or some electronic interference firing up near by. Maybe a virus?
Known potential sources of interference have been around for months/years: my old wireless 'phone is a 900MHz model, the next door neighbor's satellite antenna's been up for months. The dodgy power in this old building is hopefully offset by the APC UPS that powers my Mac.
Do I keep fiddling with the AirPort channels, or do I take my computer back to the shop for (another) warranty repair?
Greg./No, I'm not letting my neighbor steal my signal. He's subletting off me, and his access to my network (WPA2 encryption) is part of the "deal". He's a bit of a night-owl, and the late night download limit is pretty big, so it works fine all round.
I used his laptop's (and my iPod Touch's) uninterrupted access (while my iMac's floundering in packet-loss purgatory) as a way of "narrowing down" to the prime suspect: the iMac wireless module.
Greg./
ps sorry about the unnecessary alliteration; I had to substitute "purgatory" because the forum software censors "****" (aich, ee, ell, ell).
Message was edited by: gregreedee
Message was edited by: gregreedee -
100% packet loss and I can't play Online games
Recently I just got cable installed and the Internet works and it connects to my Xbox one but I have 100% packet loss and I can't play any online games or apps on my phone. Can someone please help me out as I have waited about 2 weeks to get it working!
hi AireVuqe101
I'm referring your post to our Social Media Tech Team for some further assistance.
You may not receive any contact from them until Monday, so if you need further assistance in the meanwhile, we do have a 24 hour Technical Support team who can be contacted by either calling 133933 or via Live Chat http://tel.st/gq6m
Regards -
100% packet loss while trying to update SWTOR
Hi
Last few weeks I have been getting only 47kb/s when I download updates that connect to patch.swtor.com. I have asked on there forums and have done a pathping trace and have been told by them that there is a 100% packet loss in hop 3 & 5
below is the trace
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
pathping cdn-patch.swtor.com
Tracing route to easwtor.vo.llnwd.net [87.248.210.254]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
0 removed
1 BTHomeHub.home [192.168.1.254]
2 217.47.72.122
3 217.47.206.161
4 213.1.69.42
5 217.41.169.249
6 217.41.169.109
7 109.159.251.201
8 core2-te0-2-4-0.ealing.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.251.143]
9 peer2-xe3-3-1.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.254.227]
10 manchester-nasaccess2-fe01.mdip.bt.net [195.99.125.66]
11 ve5.fr4.lon.llnw.net [69.28.171.138]
12 cdn-87-248-210-254.lon.llnw.net [87.248.210.254]
Computing statistics for 300 seconds...
Source to Here This Node/Link
Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address
0 IpowerX20 [192.168.1.64]
0/ 100 = 0% |
1 0ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% BTHomeHub.home [192.168.1.254]
0/ 100 = 0% |
2 33ms 1/ 100 = 1% 1/ 100 = 1% 217.47.72.122
0/ 100 = 0% |
3 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% 217.47.206.161
0/ 100 = 0% |
4 38ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 213.1.69.42
0/ 100 = 0% |
5 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% 217.41.169.249
0/ 100 = 0% |
6 40ms 1/ 100 = 1% 1/ 100 = 1% 217.41.169.109
0/ 100 = 0% |
7 42ms 4/ 100 = 4% 4/ 100 = 4% 109.159.251.201
0/ 100 = 0% |
8 55ms 1/ 100 = 1% 1/ 100 = 1% core2-te0-2-4-0.ealing.ukcore.bt.n
et [109.159.251.143]
0/ 100 = 0% |
9 50ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% peer2-xe3-3-1.telehouse.ukcore.bt.
net [109.159.254.227]
0/ 100 = 0% |
10 54ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% manchester-nasaccess2-fe01.mdip.bt
.net [195.99.125.66]
1/ 100 = 1% |
11 55ms 1/ 100 = 1% 0/ 100 = 0% ve5.fr4.lon.llnw.net [69.28.171.13
8]
16/ 100 = 16% |
12 48ms 17/ 100 = 17% 0/ 100 = 0% cdn-87-248-210-254.lon.llnw.net [8
7.248.210.254]
Trace complete.
SPeed test Below
Download speedachieved during the test was - 2.71 Mbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 0.6 Mbps-7.15 Mbps.
Additional Information:
Your DSL Connection Rate :3.84 Mbps(DOWN-STREAM), 0.45 Mbps(UP-STREAM)
IP Profile for your line is - 3 Mbps
ADSL Line Status
Connection information
Line state: Connected
Connection time: 35 days, 17:05:28
Downstream: 3,840 Kbps
Upstream: 448 Kbps
ADSL settings
VPI/VCI: 0/38
Type: PPPoA
Modulation: G.992.1 Annex A
Latency type: Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up): 11.0 dB / 17.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up): 47.5 dB / 27.5 dB
Output power (Down/Up): 20.1 dBm / 12.3 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up): 1182413 / 2337
CRC Events (Down/Up): 1116 / 39
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Link (Remote): 0
HEC Errors (Down/Up): 15891 / 19
Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Not sure if this information is required but here it is:-
We have no master socket
Hub is connected directly to the main phone socket
no loud noise down the phoneline
Can this be addressed please as the other week to update the game which was 1.4gigs took me over 6 hours at 0.47kb/s
below is a link to the post I did in there support section which has extra information
SWTOR
this only happens for SWTOR and I also play GW2 but have no issues at all and get 300kb/s which is actually above normal.
Hope this can be sorted please
ThanksYou're not seeing 100% packet loss at those hops. If that really were the case, then you'd get no response from all subsequent nodes.
The Pathping output is telling you that those nodes aren't responding to 100% of packets addressed to them, but that they are correctly forwarding 100% of packets not addressed to them eg the destination.
If they were dropping a small percentage of packets it could point to a congested router etc, but the fact that it's 100% tends to suggest that it's more likely that those nodes are simply configured to not respond to ICMP echo requests.
Of more concern, I would suggest, is the real packet loss within llnw.net -
Hi there,
I get 100% packet loss whilst I am playing online on the Xbox, it only occurs on FIFA 13, I have contacted EA and they have said the packet loss occurs within the BT network, I was wondering if anyone else has the same problem and whether you could help me? Here is my trace route to the EA servers [Easo.ea.com];
Host Name IP Address Hop Ping Time Ping Avg % Loss Pkts r/s Ping best/worst
BTHomeHub.home 192.168.1.254 1 1ms 2ms 0% 37 / 37 1ms / 41ms
* Unknown Host * 217.32.147.102 2 6ms 7ms 0% 37 / 37 6ms / 12ms
* Unknown Host * 217.32.147.142 3 8ms 8ms 0% 37 / 37 6ms / 32ms
* Unknown Host * 212.140.206.82 4 11ms 11ms 0% 37 / 37 10ms / 15ms
* Unknown Host * 217.41.169.221 5 10ms 10ms 0% 37 / 37 10ms / 16ms
* Unknown Host * 217.41.169.109 6 11ms 11ms 0% 37 / 37 10ms / 22ms
* Unknown Host * 109.159.251.211 7 12ms 100% 0 / 37
core1-te-0-0-0-17.ilford.ukcore.b109.159.251.189 8 20ms 100% 0 / 37
core1-pos9-1.telehouse.ukcore.bt.194.74.65.114 9 17ms 100% 0 / 37
166-49-211-153.eu.bt.net 166.49.211.153 10 18ms 26ms 0% 37 / 37 18ms / 191ms
t2a1-ge4-0-0.uk-lon1.eu.bt.net 166.49.135.17 11 15ms 17ms 0% 37 / 37 15ms / 28ms
te0-7-0-3.ccr21.lon01.atlas.cogen130.117.14.49 12 20ms 19ms 0% 37 / 37 18ms / 21ms
te0-3-0-5.mpd21.lon13.atlas.cogen130.117.0.58 13 20ms 100% 0 / 37
te0-0-0-4.ccr21.bos01.atlas.cogen154.54.5.161 14 94ms 100% 0 / 37
* Unknown Host * 154.54.5.98 15 99ms 100% 0 / 37
te0-1-0-5.mpd21.iad02.atlas.cogen154.54.5.46 16 93ms 100% 0 / 37
* Unknown Host * 154.54.88.173 17 100ms 124ms 0% 37 / 37 97ms / 459ms
* Unknown Host * 154.54.88.173 18 99ms 114ms 0% 37 / 37 97ms / 200ms
fert07-eqx-iad.ea.com 159.153.224.226 19 94ms 100% 0 / 36
fert07-eqx-iad.ea.com 159.153.224.226 20 97ms 100% 0 / 36Can you confirm what test you ran that gave you these statistics?
100% packet loss would mean that there is nothing coming through the pipe for that period of time. You are essentially disconnected at 100% loss, speed is the least of your concerns. That is also going to depend on what you are testing your packet loss test against. Perhaps VZW is blocking this particular test from completing.
A more standard test is to get a browser, connect to the Jetpack and navigate to SpeedTest.net. Run a few tests here and take the average speeds that are recorded to paint a better picture.
Xbox also has well known limitations with the VZW 4G LTE network. Unless something new has happened all Xbox users on 4G LTE are not able to host multiplayer games due to the NAT firewall that runs that network. -
No connection! 100% packet loss.
I have an IP assigned to my router, and the link light is active on the OR modem. No websites are loading. Ping requests show 100% packet loss. Tracerts time out after the first hop.
I've tried 4 modem and router reboots. I then tried 5 different DNS servers, including bt, opendns and comodo.
I'm running out of ideas... Anybody have any suggestions?Sounds like a network issue mate. Try calling the helpdesk?
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’ -
How can i fix *100# ? Since ios 7 is not working :-(
I need it to refresh my prepay option
If you go to System Preferences->Keyboard look at how your Use all F1, F2 etc, keys is set. If it is checked then to use the volume keys you need to press the fn key. If you want it use the volume keys without also pressing fn then uncheck it.
-
Packet loss higher than 100% in SQL Reporting
One of our customers is having network problems and packet loss in their network - according to Lync. The network guys claim these values are unrealistic and there've been no dropped packets on their WAN network.
On the other side, I'm looking at a Call Details Report from Lync SQL Reporting and see this in the gateway leg information:
Audio Stream (Caller -> Callee)
Codec:
PCMU
Sample rate:
8000
Packet utilization:
285
Avg. packet loss rate:
51.20%
Max. packet loss rate:
79.52%
Avg. jitter:
0 ms
Max. jitter:
0 ms
Burst duration:
5980 ms
Burst gap duration:
1890 ms
Burst density:
100.00%
Burst gap density:
0.00%
Avg. concealed samples ratio:
60.00%
Avg. stretched samples ratio:
0.00%
Avg. compressed samples ratio:
0.00%
Avg. network MOS:
1.50
Min. network MOS:
1.50
Avg. network MOS degradation:
2.21
Max. network MOS degradation:
2.21
NMOS degradation (jitter):
0.00%
NMOS degradation (packet loss):
100.00%
Audio Stream (Callee -> Caller)
Codec:
PCMU
Sample rate:
8000
Audio FEC:
False
Bandwidth estimates:
Packet utilization:
146
Avg. packet loss rate:
900.00%
Max. packet loss rate:
900.00%
Avg. jitter:
1540 ms
Max. jitter:
4406 ms
Avg. round trip:
178 ms
Max. round trip:
179 ms
From this I feel there are things to troubleshoot. :-) but how come that Lync reports a 900% packet loss?
I thought that a 100% packet loss was everything... can someone tell me what exactly are these 100+ percentages?
Thanks in advance.latest patch level :) are you not seeing these values in your Server Performance reports?
The other thing that bugs me is when you have 1 call for 1 second with "900% loss", that would average down to get red values in the summary columns for the other 100 calls as well, as the calls are not counted for seconds, but just piece by piece.
So 8 perfect calls to this one above would average "100% packet loss per call" in the summary, which is just unusable... -
Audio Stream Callee to caller max 30% packet loss rate
The call quality is poor. the MOS marks to 2.0
Media bypass is enable.
How to fix the packet loss issue?
Thank you.Hi,
Please try to use the Lync 2013 PreCall Diagnostics Tool in Windows Store.
For the issue about high packet loss rate, please double check if the network bandwidth and check if there is any
anti-virus software or any port issue for the packet loss rate issue.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support -
Percantage of packet loss on link
I am working with Cisco routers and i need somehow to find out packet loss percentage for each link (actual). I was trying to use ICMP Jitter IP SLA operation, which unfortunately returns only the number of dropped packets. So i need to get via SNMP the number of transferred packets on line to calculate the percentage. Which OID should i use to obtain this information?
Be careful, by definition a 10 Mbit half-duplex connection is equivalent to a single T1 of bandwidth, nothing even close to 6 Mbit of bandwidth. If you are running QoS (assuming CBWFQ and LLQ), based on a shaped parent policy equal to 6 Mbit you will definitely oversubscribe the 10 Mbit half-duplex connections by a significant margin.
The reason for this is that a T1 is 1.536 Mbit full-duplex (over 3 Mbit of bandwidth). A 10 Mbit half-duplex connection maxes out of usable bandwidth at about 30% utilization, with almost 100% packet loss (due to excessive collisions) at 40% utilization. As you can see, 40% utilization on a half-duplex 10 Mbit connection is equal to about 4 Mbit of bandwidth and a single T1 is over 3 Mbit of bandwidth. Again, not anywhere close to 6 Mbit of bandwidth.
Assuming you are shaping at 6 Mbit with a child CBWFQ and LLQ policy (you are shaping, right?), you will not be able to guarantee that rate of bandwidth which will crush your audio/video call.
Let me know if you have any questions/comments... -
Hi,
Going to keep it short and sweet, many of you know about the FIFA/BT/EA problem and the terrible connection online. Here is my latest traceroute to EA, don't know much about this kind of stuff, so are these results normal or is there something distinctly wrong?
Thanks.Ignore the 100% packet loss - it's a red herring. Those hops will be configured to not respond to traceroute type traffic. If you really did have 100% packet loss, then you'd also get no response from subsequent hops which isn't the case.
Your "issues" appear to be twofold:
A significant increase in latency on the transatlantic hop within level3's network.
Packet loss at EA - possibly (but not necessarily) due to congestion on their network.
HTH. -
From which ouput of the command can I know the packet loss of VoIP is occuring?
The coutners in show interface have included the packets loss of all the data including voice, so I want to find out how I can find the packet loss for voice only. It seems the show active voice command should have these parameters, but I don't know exactly which output of this command is indicating the packet loss of voice.
-
Verizon FIOS Intermittent Packet Loss Problem - How to Convince Verizon Support it's NOT ME
Hi,
I have been having a problem with Verizon FIOS Internet AND Phone since Thursday afternoon.
Basically I have intermittent outages several times a day of 15-40 seconds where my download doesn't work, but upload still does. This happens on BOTH my phone and internet. Therefore it's not my router or computer equipment causing the problem.
Here's what happens:
- On the internet: I have a periodic download problem where I can receive no data for about 15 - 40 seconds. After that it returns to normal
- On the phone: If I'm on the phone at the same time then during that period of internet loss I also can not hear anything that the person I am talking to says. However they can hear me just fine (ie. download only problem)
I have been talking to Verizon technical support and they have blamed my router and ONT. I have tried switching off the router, and using a different one. Also they have replaced the ONT twice.
* This problem occurs on BOTH the phone and internet at the same time. This clearly suggests the problem is not in my own house.
In fact I know exactly where the problem lies. I did a traceroute to google below:
Tracing route to google.com [74.125.113.106]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 4 ms 1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 5 ms 4 ms 4 ms L300.NWRKNJ-VFTTP-122.verizon-gni.net [74.105.157.1]
3 9 ms 8 ms 7 ms G2-0-0-1822.NWRKNJ-LCR-08.verizon-gni.net [130.81.133.156]
4 11 ms 8 ms 7 ms P15-0.NWRKNJ-LCR-07.verizon-gni.net [130.81.30.148]
5 9 ms 6 ms 7 ms so-5-0-0-0.NWRK-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81.29.8]
6 7 ms 6 ms 7 ms 0.so-7-0-0.XL3.EWR6.ALTER.NET [152.63.19.177]
7 9 ms 10 ms 9 ms 0.so-1-0-1.XL3.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.0.213]
8 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms TenGigE0-6-0-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.22.41]
9 33 ms 31 ms 35 ms google-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.62]
10 8 ms 11 ms 10 ms 209.85.252.215
11 18 ms 17 ms 16 ms 209.85.249.11
12 31 ms 29 ms 29 ms 209.85.241.222
13 30 ms 29 ms 29 ms 209.85.241.207
14 41 ms 39 ms 34 ms 209.85.243.1
15 27 ms 27 ms 29 ms vw-in-f106.1e100.net [74.125.113.106]
Trace complete.
Then I pinged each device for hops 2-4. When the problem occurs the first one in the hop - 74.105.157.1 - runs fine. The second device - 130.81.133.156 - times out, and all other devices further down the chain time out. This clearly suggest that the device:
130.81.133.156 has major problems.
I have mentioned this to tech support, but they have no way for me to send them logs. Apparently the support technicians at Verizon can not be trusted with even the most basic of tools like email and the web. They also shield me from the NT (Network technician), who is so special that even the tech support guys are only allowed to text chat with him, not actually talk to him. I have enough logs here to clearly show what the problem is.
The latest from tech support is that they are sending yet another guy by my house tomorrow to witness this problem firsthand. Then he will call support that will text chat with the NT, and MAYBE they'll start thinking it's not me.
My main question here is: "How do I get Verizon to believe it really could be a problem in their own network?"
Here are some threads from last year that explain exactly the same problem I'm having. So it wasn't just me:
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-TV-Technical-Assistance/Verizon-FIOS-intermittent-connection-drops...
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/Intermittent-Network-Timeouts/m-p/28138
One person said Verizon finally fixed it by replacing a PON card. I'm not sure if this is the same problem as that though.
I am an avid Starcraft player and this is driving me crazy because I am getting dropped from my games all the time. Also phone conversations suck when there's these big lags where I can't hear who I'm talking to.
I have had Verizon FIOS internet for 3 years now and this is the first problem I've ever had with it. But I'm starting to get majorly frustrated at how long it's taking to resolve the problem.
Here is a sample of the ping logs I was talking about for different devices all at the same time.
Device 2 in the Trace Route:
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=126
Device 3 in the Trace Route:
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=253
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=253
Device 4 in the Trace Route:
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Any help, thoughts, suggestions, etc would be great appreciated!
~DavidI understand your logic, but you have not eliminated 74.105.157.1 as the problem. It could be allowing packets out, like outside callers hearing you, but not allow them back in. Since you have results pinging out, trying ping back in. Use this packet loss tool. You do not need to catch it when it's not working because this tool will ping your IP address (and all the hops in between) for up to 7 days. You will easily see when packet loss is occurring.
If it can successfully ping 74.105.157.1 when the problem occurrs, then 130.81.133.156 is not the issue. This may not help dealing with the personalities at Verizon, but it will help definitively knowing which device is the issue. -
It is an intermittent, but a regular-enough-to-be-really-annoying occurrence........when someone sends an e-mail, to which is attached a photo of some kind, or a picture document, it will replicate in my inbox, sometimes 100 or more copies at a time. I delete all of them, empty the trash, and will also go to the Yahoo web version of my e-mail and delete the offending e-mail from there and empty the trash. Sometimes worked. Now that process isn't working, and this particular e-mail just filled up my inbox with over 100 copies of itself, even after the other steps were taken. Can't get any incoming mail.
This log jam of replicated e-mails prevents incoming and new mail from reaching the inbox.
Needless to say, am not too happy about it. What is causing it, and how do I fix it, other than to go to Outlook for my e-mail client....? :0) This, coupled with the constant "not responding" each time I try to send an e-mail, delete items from the "sent" or inbox folders, is really driving me nuts. We have a crappy internet connection, and that is likely part of it, but the "not responding" is not a new thing with Thunderbird, either.
Thanks in advance for any assistance you can provide. I dislike the web version of Yahoo, and don't want to have to switch to that, as it just doesn't meet e-mail needs. Would like to get Thunderbird fixed.I have not seen your error in either my IE or my chrome. I do note that you are using a "strict" Document Type Declaration.
You might try a transitional DTD, which should be more forgiving than the strict:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
Other than that, I don't see anything particular (because I don't see the error, either) that would cause the menu to drop vertically instead of horizontally.
Beth -
Lightroom is very slow, utilizes 100% CPU, then freezes or closes program. How do I fix it?
I am having a problem with Lightroom 5 being very slow, utilizing 100% CPU, then freezing or closing the program. How do I fix it?
I just upgraded to LR5 from LR3 on Sunday as well as CS6 from CS5 (which I have not tried out yet). I spent several hours talking with Vamil, from LR Support Staff yesterday. He was extremely helpful and kind and tried everything he could think of while remote-handling my PC and talking with me on the phone. He deleted preferences, cache, temp files, updated graphics with a new replacement file from AMD site, then re-downloaded and reinstalled LR5.
It is still very slow and then freezes and closes down with a message of utilizing 100% CPU. Within several seconds of using the brush in Develop, I started having lots of problems. I could not even move the picture around. The side screens would not disappear like they should. And I could not move to another picture. The day before I spent several hours trying to work on just 1 picture. After all the changes yesterday, I tried to move from picture number 1 to about 130 after having not touched it for 10 minutes, and a half hour later, it still said, "Processing" with no picture coming up, just a blank prieview pane.
LR Support suggested I get a new CPU though he thought according to specs mine should be ok and other programs were running fine.
My PC is only 2 years old.
I talked to HP briefly about CPU updates for my HP PC. He said I probably do not have a problem but suggested I run self-diagnostics and maybe buy a new CPU anyway.
I ran diagnostics listed through the HP Support Assistant connection on my PC. All was ok.
I still researched if I could buy a compatible CPU upgrade. I cannot even find any CPUs still selling that are listed for my PC. Best Buy Store said they could not even order a compatible CPU. They said my Bus speed may not be big enough, so they suggest I get a new PC. What Bus speed do I need?
I have the following PC Setup:
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T Processor 2.70 GHz with 6 Cores
with 2700 MHz Base, 3200 MHz Boost, and 4000 System Bus Speed, and 95 watts;
HP Pavilion Elite, HPE-500y, 900 GB Free, new in 2011;
Windows 7, 64 Bit;
RAM 16 GB, DDR3;
Graphics AMD Radeon HD 6450;
Nikon, D200, with Raw Files;
External Hard Drive for Original Photos, 600 GB Free;
LR Catalog and Library are on Main Hard Drive;
Monitor, Sony CPD-200ES, new in 2004.
I am thinking of buying a new monitor tonight mostly so I can do better photo work while enlarging the pictures to do it. I am concerned that while it will help my viewing, it will take more power away, and make my usage of LR5 even worse. Will a new monitor affect my performance? I am looking at HP Monitors with IPS. Is this the best recommended choice for LR and Photoshop CS6?
I think I would like to stay with a 6 core processor since I need to have several items open for other non-Photoshop functions. When running LR5, I had everything else closed. With LR3, I was able to have other things open.
I do not really want to buy a new computer and know that those I have talked with at this point are only guessing after looking for what they thought should fix it. 4 People from Lightroom Support have all thought I should not be having problems with my setup.
I bought one of the best computers 2 years ago. Is it really obsolete already so that I cannot use LR5? Is everyone else buying a new PC every 2 years? I used to go 5-7 years.
Even though I have figured out some of what my PC has, I really do not know technically what I am talking about so am at the mercy of other's help. Are there any solutions that might work short of buying a new computer?
I also have taken 40th anniversary photos for some people and am waiting to give them as a free gift since I am not a professional at all. I am hoping to get through this problem soon so that I can provide some nice memories for them.
I have not gotten any further than trying to adjust 1 picture. I have no comments on uploading speed, since I did that while still in LR3.
Thank you for your time and help.I'm running LR with no speed issues on an Intel 17-860 quad core with about the same performance as your AMD Phenom II X6 1045T Processor. My system is also an HP, which originally had a single 1TB 7200 HDD. I've since added a second 2TB Black Caviar HDD, which provided no significant difference in LR's performance.
AMD processors do not implement hyper-threading and don't need it. I'd start debug by process of elimination:
1) Disconnect all externally attached USB, FireWire, or other externally connected devices except keyboard, mouse, and your single 1280 x1024 display. This includes all externally attached memory card readers, phones, ipads, etc.
2) Reboot and logon as Administrator.
3) Remove your Internet connection and turn off all Antivirus and firewall programs.
4) Open LR and under Catalog Settings set 'Standard Preview Size' to 1440 (slightly larger than your display width). Under the Metadata tab here make sure 'Automatically Write changes into XMP is NOT checked.
4) Create a 'New Catalog,' Create a new folder and add about 10 raw image file copies to it for testing, and Import it into the new catalog. In the Import module make sure under File Handling 'Render Previews' has 1:1 selected. Wait until all Preview building has completed in the Library module.
Try editing these image files inside the new catalog as you were previously.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I can't get on line with out some keychain request for a password but it will not accept the one password I have. I really hate this. I have tried to unlock the local items but it want's a password and it will not take my password... PLEASE PLEASE
-
Hi, I've just bought a 'Monster iStudioLink' lead to record a guitar onto my Mac using Garageband, but something isn't working! I've gone into System Preferences to check if there is a sound input and the iMacs internal mic is working fine but theres
-
i pass entry f-48 for advace payment that time surcharge not charge beco every time change master dta eg== vendor master data tax colum--- invoce time libale my problem is i change master data & liable to payment cloum what is permonant solutiaon (
-
Any date for jdeveloper 10.1.3 beta with adf features
Hi Jdeveloper team, Is there any date we can expect the next jdeveloper 10.1.3 beta with more complete adf features ? I'm currently evaluating the technology stack+tool to use for our next project ( preferably jsf based ), the lack of an adf faces re
-
Hello! I have a ThinkPad T500 from 3 years at my office and i decided to buy it for me. These years it worked just with his Intel GMA 4500 MHD. At my home, i tryed to switch it to ATI Radeon 3650 and......there is the problem!!! First I installed the