How to Restrict transaction GR55

Hi friends,
I want to restrict generate option in transaction GR55 to some users. only few groups needs to be able to generate the reports.I ran a trace and could not find any auth object which restricts the Generate option.Please help.
Thanks,
kumar.

Juul Beckers,
Thanks a lot for your reply. I am able to restrict user by S_Program and group: GRWT .I tested it wrongly before(my apologies). I appreciate your help. But this does not work for me because we have a common access role which has access to all auth groups from S_develop object. If I want to restrict program RGRGEN00 then I need to change from authorization group GRWT to other customized auth group.
I opened SAP note and waiting for reply as to me program should check for object G_803J_GJB and activity 01 and allow user to generate report groups which is not happening as expected. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Gowrinadh ,
Thanks for your time. End users will not access to auth object S_CTS_ADMI

Similar Messages

How to restrict transaction type in customized activity pop-up

We have created a custom workcenter link for search enhancement of activities. We copied the work center link and are calling the same component as in std search but a different customized configuration with added and deleted fields in search criteria. This works fine. Now the requirement is to restrict the 'transaction types' available when we click on the 'new' button in the new custom activity search page. As this pop-up emanates from the std component, it can not be functionally configured (because that would restrict the 'transaction types' while creating new activity in std componnet) but should be technically handled. Please advise.

Hi Amar,
Solution here is to let the framework know who is caller ?
That is, when pop up is opening, you have to put a code in this pop up view to understand who is invoking this pop up , Is it the search page of std. component configuration or is it the custom search page configuration ?
So have a static attribute in some Z class, you can use your IMPL class also for that matter, Now whenever you know that its custom config i.e. in DO_CONFIG_DETERMINATION, read the role key( i assumed that you have a role key for your custom config)
and if its custom role key, then set this static parameter say ZCUST_CONFIG = abap_true else abap_false (this is must to reset it using else as this is static attribute )
Now, in your pop_up view, read this static attribute as XXXX_IMPL=>zcust_config , and if true, then you know that the pop up is invoking from custom config, so do the coding to remove the unwanted transaction types.
and you are done !!
Hope it helps you.
Thanks & Regards,
SUCHITA

How to restrict transaction to run in Foreground?

Hi,
can i restrict a user to run one particular transaction in foreground?
Regards
Lijo joseph

Here is a way that you can remove the "Execute in Background" option from the "program" menu of a report program.
report zrich_0002 .
* Used to limit user commands on selection-screen
include rsdbc1xx.
* Selection Screen
parameters: p_check type c.
* Events
at selection-screen output.
append 'SJOB' to current_scr-excl.
Regards,
Rich Heilman

How to restrict transaction PE03 (HR: Features) to display only mode?

We have a situation where a set of users need access to transaction PE03 to display HR Features. However they should not be changing any feature through it.
The only auth objects that are checked for this transaction seem to be s_tcode and p_tcode. As both this objects are checked during transaction start, there does not seem to be any check for display/change access.
Appreciate any inputs.....Thanks!

> I was wondering if we could find an appropriate user exit and put in some custom code for checking the display/change access of the user. However, I am yet to find an exit to do this.
Just had a quick glance at the program and couldn't find anything fast either... that could say more about my abap reading skills than the program structure
I suggest you have an abaper look at it to see if it's easier to build a read-only copy of PE03 or create a report that delivers the same information. To find out if any user exit is available you could also give the HR forum a go.
Jurjen

Transaction:GR55 Deferred revenue reports for Japan need to Local Currency

Hi All
Deferred Revenue Balance reports to be displayed in Local currency. I am running GR55 transaction for DR01a sreport group.The amounts in outputis not matching with the values on sale order display....
Any idea how to achieve "Transaction:GR55 Deferred revenue reports for Japan need to Local Currency".
Thanks,
Suresh.

This is the forum for Oracle's SQL Developer tool, not for general SQL and PL/SQL questions.
Questions like this will get a better response in the PL/SQL forum.
Before you repost there, see SQL and PL/SQL FAQ post for instructions on the kind of information you need to post to maximise your chances of useful help.

How to put data restrictions in transaction: GR55

Hi,
When I run a report with gr55 it shows figures for all profit center.I have defined a role which has profit centers restriction .
but when ever user run gr55 he can see the data for the all proit center.
How can i put data restriction on GR55.
Anybody?
Best regards,
Bhavesh

Hi,
You can create a selection group that will serve as parameter in your GR55 report. Go to transaction code GRR2 and edit your form. You can set/tick the hierarchy node or variable in the profit center characteristic.

Restrictions on the transaction GR55

Hi gurus
can you help? need to implement restrictions on the transaction GR55, the group reports that the user will access, to put a report a group of authorization and put in the role in all fields BRGRU, but does not work, the user has access to all the Infomed .... anyone can give me an idea of how Restrict adcional this?
thanks

Dear guru,
Even I was wondering about the same recently and used the search to revert back.
What have you tried so far?
Or do you want us to flame your controllers for you?
Cheers,
Julius

How to restrict some users from viewing a screen of standard transaction

Hi All,
I need to restrict certain user ids from viewing the 'Payment Transactions' screen for the below mentioned transactions.
FK01, FK02, FK03, MK01, MK02, MK03, XK01, XK02, XK03
The Basis consultant has tried to configure it. However its not working. So need to find other solution.
For all transactions other than FK01, MK01, XK01 (create vendor), the BAdi GOS_SRV_SELECT is called before the payment transaction screen appears. But for transactions FK01, MK01and XK0, no such BAdi is there.
Also I'm not able to figure out how to restrict that particular screen using Badi GOS_SRV_SELECT. What will be the service name for this?
Please help !!!
Thanks in advance,
Radhika

hi,
u can do this using user exits.
identify the appropriate exit for ur transaction and thn put condition like
if username = ...
loop at screen.
hide..
endloop.
i was just trying to give u some hint .make it to ur best.
reward if hlpful.

SHD0 transaction-how to restrict the variant transaction to specified users

I have created a variant transaction for MM02 wherein am disabling a field .I want this field to be disabled only for certain users.The variant transaction which I created affects all users.So,for everyone the field is grayed out.How to restrict this for specified users???

Hello,
Try to look an exit for that transaction, either user exit or badi, then try to disable the field doing a LOOP AT SCREEN, but first you should have the restricted users in a Z table, or by cheking the profiles for each user..
Another way to do it is trying to do it the profiles customization, maybe you can do it that way.
Cheers!!
Dont forget to reward.
Gabriel P.

Data inconsistency: posting with restricted transaction type (FAA_POST047)

Hi colleagues!
I have the following error:
Data inconsistency: posting with restricted transaction type
Message no. FAA_POST047
Diagnosis
You are trying to post in company code 1000 with transaction type 130 in ledger group 0N. According to table TABWA, this transaction type is limited. Nonetheless, according to your entries, you want to post to area 11.
System Response
Using limited transaction types is obsolete and would lead to an inconsistent posting in this situation. The system rejects the posting.
Procedure
Use a transaction type that is not limited. And, if possible, choose the ledger group and/or depreciation area on the initial screen.
According to specific accounting we shouldn't post to one of the depr. area, so most of the tr.types are restricted to post to all areas except this one.
Because of this, posting from MM with acc.assignment 'A' is impossible - I have this error.
Any ideas how to solve?
Thanks in advance

Hi Anton
This looks like your transaction type -130 is limited to post only in ledger group-0N as per the transaction type configuration. Due to which system is unable to post all the ledgers and hence this lead to inconsistency.
Please verify the transaction type 130- in configuration T code - OAYA and see if it is restricted by depreciation area (eventually allow to post only ledger group- 0N.
Tcode - OAYA (Limit Transaction Types to Depreciation Areas)
please verify and let us know the update. hope this helps
Best Regards
Jomon

How to restrict the job start conditions (only "Immediate" type) ?

Hi,
We allow our users to schedule and execute in background mode transactions (example IP19, IW38). We gave them for that authorizations (object S_BTCH_JOB with LIST, PROT, RELE and SHOW - objetct S_PROGRAM with BTCSUBMIT).
We would like that users can schedule and execute their jobs only with the u201CImmediateu201D job start condition (in the Start Time screen for the type of start condition : Immediate, Date/Time, After job, After event, or At operation mode).
Another solution: prohibit the scheduling and the execution background job in a certain time interval ...
How can restrict the job start conditions ?
Thank you.
Patrice.

Hi Jan,
Yes, sa38 makes it possible indeed to execute in background into immediate mode a job but
the user have to know the name of the program to be carried out ...
The user knows only the name of these transactions trade. For example, IW38.
In the menu of this transaction, SAP gives the possibility to execute in background :
Program --> Execute in Background --> display of Start Time screen for the type of start condition :
Immediate, Date/Time, After job, After event, or At operation mode).
It is at this time there that we want that the user can only choose the "immediate" mode.
We must thus prohibit the other choices (Date/Time, After job, After event, or At operation mode) ... and
and we don't know how to restrict these other options in this screen "Start Time screen for the type of start condition".
Thank you.
By.

How to restrict the duplicate values in lov column of VO based Adv Table

Hi Gurus,
I want to restrict the duplicate values at lov which is a colunm in an Adv Table.
If user enters duplicate values then first it should show an error msg that Duplicate values have been entered.
After the duplicate values have been removed, then the user can save all the values in the table.
My Adv Table is based on a VO.
The link how to restrict the duplicate values at form level
talks about Adv Table based on a EoVO, which doesnot work in my case.
My Approach,
I am iterating through RowSetIterator and committing through PROCEDURE.
I am able to avoid duplicate entry through a function checkRespId. (given below)
Below code is for iterating and committing.
public void saveline(String reqid,String userid)
System.out.println("RequestId/saveline"+reqid);
System.out.println("UserId/saveline"+userid);
OAViewObject vo = (OAViewObject)getRespLineVO1();
RespLineVORowImpl row = null;
int fetchedRowCount = vo.getFetchedRowCount();
RowSetIterator deleteIter = vo.createRowSetIterator("deleteIter");
if (fetchedRowCount > 0)
deleteIter.setRangeStart(0);
deleteIter.setRangeSize(fetchedRowCount);
for (int i = 0; i < fetchedRowCount; i++)
System.out.println("Inside the for LOOP");
row = (RespLineVORowImpl)deleteIter.getRowAtRangeIndex(i);
String respoidid = row.getAttribute("ResponsibilityId")+"";
String respname = row.getAttribute("ResponsibilityName")+"";
String stdate = row.getAttribute("StartDate")+"";
String enddate = row.getAttribute("EndDate")+"";
String linestatus ="A";
if(userid!=null)
if(!(respoidid.equals("null")) && respoidid!=null)
String checkingrespid=null;
checkingrespid = checkRespId(userid,respoidid);+contains no if not duplicate and yes if its duplicate+
System.out.println("checkingrespid for Resp with ID :"+respoidid+"exists or not "+checkingrespid);
if(checkingrespid.equals("No"))
String message, result = null;
Connection txn = getOADBTransaction().getJdbcConnection();
try
calling PROC ...
catch(Exception e)
message = "Error in Inserting into line" + e;
throw new OAException(message, OAException.ERROR);
else
throw new OAException("You have entered duplicate no. of values", OAException.ERROR);
else
System.out.println("respoidid is null");
break;
deleteIter.closeRowSetIterator();
public String checkRespId(String userid,String respoidid)
String createRow="No";
OAViewObject vo = (OAViewObject)findViewObject("CheckRespVO1");
if (vo != null)
vo.setWhereClauseParams(null);
vo.setWhereClauseParam(0, userid);
vo.setWhereClauseParam(1, respoidid);
vo.executeQuery();
System.out.println("ROW COUNT IS "+vo.getRowCount());
if(vo.getRowCount()>0)
createRow="Yes";
else
createRow="No";
return createRow;
Problem:
I remove the duplicate entries and click on save and get this error.
Unable to perform transaction on the record. \nCause: The record contains stale data. The record has been modified by another user.
\nAction: Cancel the transaction and re-query the record to get the new data.
Thanks,
Sombit

Hi Anil,
I am trying out your code but stuck in inserting the rows
using your code in URL: http://oracleanil.blogspot.com/2010/09/oaf-passing-table-type-object-to-oracle.html
I am always getting the same exception i.e COde blast in when I run.
My modified code is:
String[] as = null;
Number[] vNumber = null;
Number[] vNumberrespid = null;
Number reqidnumber = null;
reqidnumber = new Number(Integer.parseInt(reqid));
Connection txn = getOADBTransaction().getJdbcConnection();
String mCreateSearchRequestStatement = null;
OAViewObject vo = (OAViewObject)findViewObject("RespLineVO1");
int j = vo.getFetchedRowCount();
try
System.out.println("abouce try");
vo.reset();
if (vo.getFetchedRowCount() > 0)
System.out.println(String.valueOf("Fetched row count ").concat(String.valueOf(vo.getFetchedRowCount())));
int i = 0;
as = new String[j];
vNumber = new Number[j];
vNumberrespid = new Number[j];
while (vo.hasNext())
vo.next();
System.out.println(String.valueOf("Inisde the do while loop").concat(String.valueOf(i)));
vNumber[i] = (reqidnumber);
vNumberrespid = ((Number)vo.getCurrentRow().getAttribute("ResponsibilityId"));
as[i] = String.valueOf(vo.getCurrentRow().getAttribute("ResponsibilityName")).concat(String.valueOf(""));
System.out.println("Request ID "+reqidnumber[i]);//getting null even there is some value selected
System.out.println("ResponsibilityId "+vNumberrespid[i]);//getting null even there is some value selected
System.out.println("Resp Name "+as[i] );//getting null even there is some value selected
i++;
CallableStatement cs = txn.prepareCall("{call XX_PassTableType.XX_PassTableType_prc(:1, :2,:3)}");
ARRAY array = new ARRAY(new ArrayDescriptor("APPS.JTF_NUMBER_TABLE", txn), txn, vNumber);
ARRAY arraynew = new ARRAY(new ArrayDescriptor("APPS.JTF_NUMBER_TABLE", txn), txn, vNumberrespid);
ARRAY array1 = new ARRAY(new ArrayDescriptor("APPS.JTF_VARCHAR2_TABLE_100", txn), txn, as);
cs.setArray(1, array);
cs.setArray(2, arraynew);
cs.setArray(3, array1);
cs.registerOutParameter(3, 2003, "JTF_VARCHAR2_TABLE_100");
cs.execute();
ARRAY error = null;
error = (ARRAY)cs.getArray(2);
if ((error != null) && (error.length() > 0))
System.out.println(String.valueOf("Error is ").concat(String.valueOf(error.getArray())));
String[] retError = new String[j];
retError = (String[])error.getArray();
System.out.println(String.valueOf("Error in saving data").concat(String.valueOf(retError[0])));
cs.close();
catch (Exception exception)
throw new OAException("code blast", OAException.ERROR);
Thanks,
Sombit

How to restrict the change access in CRM for OLTP orders

Hi Guru's,
Please let me know how to restrict the change access in CRM for the orders that are created in ECC. The ECC orders will only for display in CRM but not for change,
We have the orders that are created in ECC, it will flows to CRM and should restrict the access to get in to the change mode in CRM but as of now CRM system is allowing change mode for ECC orders and ending up with errors.
Is there any additional middleware parameter that needs to be added to SMOFPARSFA table to get this functionality! Please advice! Thank your for your help.
Regards
Suneel

Hi.
You can use the PFCG role to control if the user is able to create, change, delete or only display a business transaction type.
Regards.

How to restrict the user from making any changes in Sales order- item level

Hi to all
How to restrict the users from making any changes in sales order at item level if the same sales order is released by senior user through status profile.
Regards
Anish Parikh
Edited by: anish parikh on Jan 24, 2008 5:16 AM

Hi Anish,
This can be achieved through the roles and authorization.
This can be done through the basis team. they can create user profiles and roles.
For the roles they assign some transaction codes so that they can view the only assigned tr. codes.
Like that ur requirement can be done.
Also u can prevent the user to change any fields in the sales order screen (VA02). for that please modify the authorisations.
Hope i answers.
Reward points if useful.
Edited by: kaleeswaran bhoopathy on Jan 24, 2008 9:57 AM

How to restrict changes in Tabs: Defaults and Parameters in tcode: SU3

Good Morning Everybody.
Do you know how to restrict End Users can change data stored in Tabs Defaults and Parameters of tcode: SU3.
I was checking Authorization Objects related this transaction but I did not find a way to fix this issue.
Thanks for your comments.
Mauricio Cardozo.
BASIS Consultant.

I've been looking into this same question. I don't think there's any way to protect individual user parameters, which is what we really wanted to do, but it is possible to protect the Parameters tab as a whole while still granting access to the Address and Defaults tabs (if desired). SU3, which is usually given to all users, gives change access to all three tabs in the User Data, but to make it more fine-grained, as the last person said, take away SU3 and instead grant whatever combination of SU0, SU1, or SU2 makes sense for your organization. SU0 gives access to the Defaults tab, SU1 to the Address tab, and SU2 to the Parameters tab.
So, in your case, you would grant SU1 only, so users can change their name or phone number, etc, but not Defaults or Parameters. They won't even be able to see defaults or parameters if you do this, though.
I hope this helps.
--Matt

How to Restrict transaction GR55

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for