HR/Legal Investigation

Hello Everyone,
We are running Exchange 2010 and I need to perform an email investigation for legal/auditing purposes without any user knowing about it. We backup our Exchange 2010 environment with Symantec Backup Exec 2010 R3.
I am able to restore a person's mailbox using GRT (granular recovery technology) from my tape backups. I am also able to redirect this restore to a 'investigaton' mailbox.
After I complete my investigation, I need to be able to delete the content of that 'investigation' mailbox
without allowing the system to send out any notifications (i.e. receipts, deleted email without reading, etc.) to anyone on the system.
I found where I can delete the content of the mailbox, but if there are any emails that have not been read and a read receipt was requested, the system sends that out to the requestor.
Search-Mailbox -id "exchrecovery" -DeleteContent -Confirm:$false
Is there a different way to perform this type of investigation?
Thanks
Walter

Similar Messages

BT Infinity - I need an answer please.

I have already posted in this forum before and not recieved much response. Only one kind person who told me about his upsetting experience with BT Infinity.
I have (a countless number of times) rang up BT Customer Services about whether my area will be provided with BT Infinity or not. I tell them my post code and explain that I'm with talktalk who have slammed my line so i can't do a line check over phone number on the BT website. I've also notified them that people next to me on a different street (Literally just outside my road) have recieved BT Infinity and me and my neighbors have yet to be told that we could recieve it.
So alas, here is my question and situation. (And I will also provide a map of my area with FTTC cabinets, Premises etc.)
I have been waiting and shaking with excitement when I had first taken a peep at the BT Infinity exchange list. My exchange was due 31st September!, Excellent I thought as I could finally get off of my crummy 3meg connection and start some real gaming, downloading and uploading youtube videos!.
But It wasn't until early september that I started to have my doubts as my address and postcode did not show a BT Infinity - 31st Sept on the line checker and my Neighbors addresses and postcode did. So with haste I decided to ring up BT Customer Services and discuss the issue with them as I had previously spoken face to face with BT Openreach engineers who pointed the finger at BT sales. I explained to the man on the phone that I had tested my neighbors addresses and phone numbers but could not test mine due to talktalk slamming my line as their own. As we had previously been on BT in the past in the same house he said he could check which cabinet I had been connected too. I was quite suprised to have been told that I was going to recieve Infinity around 21st October. Well the date now is the 17th October 2010 and the line checker is still saying I can't get it. But let's look on the bright side. The line checkers sais my Exchange will recieve an upgrade to ADSL2+ which will give me amazing speeds of...3Meg...Exactly what I have at the moment. (Yes as you can guess I'm pretty annoyed)
I can honestly say that if Infinity were supplied to my postcode, EVERYONE in my street would switch. 3meg SUCKS!. Especially if your a steam user like me who needs to download 7gb games when I buy them!. That's like a whole day of downloading!!.
Here is a map of my area which gives you houses with and without BT Infinity, FTTC and non FTTC cabinets.
I should also mention that I'm between 2 cabinets. One has FTTC and the other doesnt. I've also read that FTTC cabinets can supply in the hundreds. Which would be my whole area with one cabinet.
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF&msa=0&msid=105591797753881167263.000490e49745f985a9a02
Someone please give me a simple response or hopefully I can attract the attention of an Admin to resolve this!

BT is made up of crooks, criminals and fraudulent traders
jjgraphics wrote:
jtanna,
It is unhelpful and rude to post like that on the forum. Your statements are at the very least libellous and could attract a legal investigation.
This forum is for people to help each other. Lets keep it that way.
jtanna said
BT is made up of crooks, criminals and fraudulent traders
Maybe BT are part of the Banking system sound abouit the same
If any post helps tick the star box on the left
Just cause Im paranoid dont mean they are not out to get me

Unable to find any active legal regulations for determination proc. "TEST1"

Hi Guys
This is in regards to a Customs document for a Payment doc
We have just finished the configuration of the Finance integration which will stop blocked partners during the Payment run
Now when we create a Proposal in the Payment run in ECC, the same document gets transferred to GTS, now even though the SPL is active when we check the Log there is a message Unable to find any active legal regulations for determination proc
Upon further investigation of the customs document i found 2 things
1) In the Geography section Country of Departure is populated with US, but the Country of destination is blank, this might be a reason as the Legal regulation checks both the countries and then activate, any idea how i can get the same to populate?
2) If the above population does happen, from which partner type should it come from, as in my customs document only Vendor and Bank is there, in the PO customs document this is being populated properly
Any idea what is wrong here?
Thanks
Carl

Hi Dave
Thanks for answering again.
I have tried activating it at country level, country/country, country/group, Same result in case of all
As i know now since the Country of Destination is missing, it cannot activate the last two, but the same is also not working at country level.
So is there anyway to maybe have some partner function which can populate the Destination country.
Any other advice will be really helpful..
Thanks
Carl

Absolutely livid - considering legal action.

Firstly, in there interest of manners and politeness, hello there. First time I've posted in here, and I wish it were on friendlier terms. Sadly I'm about to go off on a rant.
On the 18th February we started experiencing problems with our phoneline, causing both our dialtone/phone to drop out and our broadband to lose connection. This of course meant we lost our BT Vision as well, and as we have no other TV we were left with NOTHING. The fault was sporadic, cured by unplugging and then re-connecting our equipment to the BT socket and resetting the home hub. I spoke to people in India at least twice who were useless (to put it politely). This lasted a week until 25th Feb, before I lost all services completely and finally got BT to acknowledge it as a fault on the line. I should add here that my neighbours either side both run businesses, have 7 phonelines between them, and have experienced no faults. Not one of the other 8 houses within 1/2 mile of mine have experienced any faults at all either - I've asked around and it's just me.
I was given a 'deadline' of 2nd March for repair, and on the 1st March an Openreach engineer called round, did some checks on the line and pinpointed the fault to being with the network approx 300m from the property. fair play I thought, and he said they'd be back "tomorrow" (2nd) to rectify the problem. Needless to say, the 2nd March came and went with no sign of any Openreach activity anywhere within half a mile - let alone 300m.
I rang to enquire what had happened on the 3rd March, and was told there was a delay as the engineer had reported it as being a major fault that needed dig work, so it'd be another 3 working days. That came and went, as did the next deadline of 3 more working days. Finally I was given a date of 22nd March for the contractors to do the dig work, with the Openreach teams coming in to do the joints/cabling to fix the fault on 23rd March, over 4 weeks from the original fault being reported. That is an unacceptable amount of time in my opinion, given that I have a 20 month old daughter, my wife is pregnant, and that I am trying to run a business from home which has suffered considerably.
23rd March came and went, still no repair!!!! Fairly livid now as I am sure you can imagine.
I should add at this stage that I have spoken to at least three customer service managers, and one was 'kind enough' (after 45 minutes on my mobile, at my expense) to escalate the problem with Openreach around the 9th-10th March, and say he would keep me informed. I also explained that there was no way I was going to continue paying my £60 monthly bill when they weren't supplying the services I had already paid for in advance for period 18th Feb-17th March, and was told this was understandable.
On 24th March I received a voicemail from BT's "Keep In Touch" team, saying they apologised (I have had 43 expressions of apology from BT staff over this to date) but that the fault had still yet to be fixed, but that the contractors were scheduled to do the dig work on 12th April, with the Openreach team coming out to do the cabling on 19th April. The very next day I received a call from a customer service manager asking if I was happy with the repair carried out on the 23rd... "WHAT *&%*(^&^&*^( REPAIR?!!!!"
Firstly, this further delay is unacceptable and I am considering legal action over it - BT is clearly failing the Duty of Care it has towards it's customers by putting my wife and family at risk by leaving us completely isolated - we have no mobile signal at home and I fail to see how they can supply phone services to properties all around ours but not to us.
I would like to know exactly why the dig work wasn't carried out on 22nd March, and why it would then take a further THREE WEEKS for them to come out on 12th APRIL, and a further week after the dig work for the engineers to come out and sort the cable when originally it should have been 24 hours.
In the mean time, on the 18th March my bill was due. As explained to BT Customer Services, I wasn't going to pay for it - they had a month's money on 18/2 and only provided a sporadic service for under a week so as far as I am concerned, they owe me. Today is the 4th April, and I received an email today saying my service has been suspended and my info will be shared with credit reference agencies etc. Needless to say, I am utterly furious.
BT have failed on multiple occasions, the customer service departments are spread so far and wide they have no clue what each other are doing or saying to their customers, and the engineers plain and simple just don't do their jobs when they're supposed to - and then you can't speak to them direct yourself you have to go through the abysmal customer service teams again.
Please can someone who knows what they are talking about, can get things done, and is able to sort my phone line out within an acceptable timeframe get in touch with me and get this sorted - I am seriously considering legal action and leaving BT altogether... oh yeah, I forgot, I can't do that as there's no phoneline in place so I can't go to any other provider as they all need phonelines where I live.

Hi PeteG
Welcome to the community.
Send us an email using the form linked by Hamish72 above and we shall have this investigated for you.
Thanks
Stuart
BTCare Community Mod
If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
We are sorry that we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)

I bought a mac companion for my desktop mac running os x but received the following error message when I tried to install the quikprotect software download: "power pc no longer supported." I did not read that anywhere when investigating. What gives?

I bought a mac companion for my desktop mac running os x but received the following error message when I tried to install the quikprotect software download: "power pc no longer supported." I did not read that anywhere when investigating. What gives?

PPC, also known as PowerPC has not existed on Macs since the beginning of 2006. Apple made a bridge software and included it with Mac OSes until 10.6.8 known as Rosetta that would allow you to run software written for the PowerPC Macs. 10.7 and later can't run that bridge software. You have one of several options:
Install 10.6 retail on a USB Flash drive, and run that application while booted from there.
Find an update designed for 10.7 or later of the software.
Find a combination of Virtualbox or Paralllels that can legally run a version of 10.6 side by side with your 10.7 software.
Run Windows on your Mac with Virtualbox or use CrossOver that requires no Windows to run a Windows version of your application.
Your Mac is an iMac Intel. I will ask a moderator redirect your thread to the 10.7 forum, and no action is needed on your part.

Uninterrupted useage of my legally purchased and registered Adobe Photoshop elements 10 software.

Good afternoon,
This IS not the first complaint of this nature (as it has happened to me once before, with an older version of the Adobe Photoshop software).
I have been the legal and registered owner of this software (Adobe Photoshop Elements 10) for over 2 years. In the past few weeks, each time I try to use my software, I am prompted in every instance to use my software, that an unusual request to treminate this operation has been recorded and that Adobe Photoshop 10 has become unresponsive .... with NO explanation offered. Naturally Windows has no interest in restricting my usage of a software which I paid for and duly registered when I installed it.
I have been an Adobe Photoshop Elements registered supporter/user for years (starting with Version 7). Since NO legitimate reason is known for this unexplained harrasment, I am left with no other alternative but to register a complaint. In the previous instance when this identical intrusion happened, after I investigated the reason behind such obstruction of service to a software which I was a legitimate and registered owner of, I was advised that I had more than one copy installed.
When does Adobe intend to join the rest of us in the 21st. centry and realize that most likely the majority of their customers run more than one hard drive in their PC cases, and that as a back-up precaution, the same software might be installed on the back up hard drive as well, (and still in the only PC case the owner has)?
I would respectfully request that this harrasment be discontinued IF us, "your customers", are expected to continue supporting the future Photoshop Elements releases. It is NOT our fault, that Adobe seems to be legally behind the times?
The courtesy of a response and correction of this ongoing unjustified interruption of services would be the minimum reaction that would serve as a sign of good faith and proper cutomer rights recognition?
Regards,
Wing Rider 11.

Hello Thomas,
*I have worked with people whose first language was NOT, English as it also
is not mine, but I have been here in Canada 59 years, so I had some time to
get better at it.*
*Thank You for your suggestion. In frustration with this endlessly
stubborn process, I completely removed the software and re installed it all
over again, it seems to be working as it used to be before my problems
started some weeks ago. Here it is now 5:42 PM in the early evening. it
becomes dark after 6:30 PM in our area, but here it is a comfortable +13 C,
which is probably a lot cooler than where you are.*
Best wishes to YOU,
Frank/Wing Rider 11

Legal Action Suit re RIM BB Curve - Product Defective - Scroll Non-Functional

I am investigating bringing a legal action suit against RIM for their defective Curve 9300 product - specifically the defective scroll operation which renders the phone unusable. If you are interested in participating in this action, please reply to this post.

Acrobat Scanning with CM1312nfi MFP. Can't change from legal size paper

I've had the same problem with mulitple versions of Adobe Acrobat, but most recenlty with version XI Standad.
All my scans using the Acobat interface result in legal size scans using the ADF, instead of letter size. When I try to "Configure Preset" the Paper Size is set to "Automatic" and there are no other options available in the drop down box.
I have to do a custom scan and manually select the paper size using the HP interface, but I would like to use the Acrobat interface instead due to the volume of scans I perform.
In Acrobat the Scanner is identified as "WIA- HP CLJ CM1312 Scan". I am running Windows 8.1 64 bit. I have uninstalled and reinstalled the drivers and Acrobat, but the problem persists.
All help appreciated. Thanks.

Not sure if this is the same problem I'm having. I have a HP C5180, and when I go to print I get all the necessary options (by dropping down the traingle as advised above), and all's great..... apart from the Source tray is always set to Main Tray instead of the Photo.
I can change it each time I print, but it won't stay defaulted to Photo Tray even when I save or 'Save as' a new Preset. I have tried to overwrite the default ones, but no go, and also saved as a new Preset, but it still doesn't come up as the default selection next time I go in to print.
Sounds easy enough to cope with I know, but I've set it up for a 84 year old to print from and I don't expect she'll manage to do this change every time.

How do I restrict my pdf form to print legal only

I have a form (in Acrobat 9 Pro) that should only be printed on legal. I am unable to locate information. Have tried setting the Adobe PDF Document Properties (Page Size) to legal. Is there a way to limit to printing legal only?? Would appreciate any help on this topic. Thanks much.

Yes, tried that. But unfortunately that option doesn't allow me to restrict users to only print their forms on legal paper. But thank you for your help.
Barbara A. Smith
Communications Coordinator
Marketing and Communications Group
Supply & Services Division
MB Infrastructure and Transportation
p. (204) 945-8892
f. (204) 948-3414
 Please consider the environment before printing this email.

Problem in creation of legal entity in R12

Hi,
can any one tell about the legal entity error:
Error
A value has been provided for a non-enabled or non-existent descriptive flexfield segment. (SEGMENT=REGION_1) (VALUE=India)
A value has been provided for a non-enabled or non-existent descriptive flexfield segment. (SEGMENT=REGION_2) (VALUE=Tamilnadu)
A value has been provided for a non-enabled or non-existent descriptive flexfield segment. (SEGMENT=TOWN_OR_CITY) (VALUE=Chennai)
ORA-29273: HTTP request failed ORA-06512: at "SYS.UTL_HTTP", line 1674 ORA-12545: Connect failed because target host or object does not exist in Package xle_legal_address_swi Procedure create_legal_address

its due to the number ranges that is specified in the partner determination ... chech what is the number range assigned in the parner determination ,,, so once u check that u have to manually enter the number between that range only .. this should solve ur problem...
path to check the number range is as below :
spro-img-logistic generalbusiness partner-customers---define account groups and field selection ---
at this point click position button at the bottom and give ur account group .. select ur account group and click detail button .. now inside that u can see the specified number range .. dafault is 08 ( means u can specify between 400000 to 499999)..
and some times u may not have defined number range... check urs and create accordingly ... this should solve ur problem...
rewards if solved ..
thank you
madhan

Why is default scan in Adobe Acrobat 9.3.1 legal size

I have HP LaserJet with new software. I scan directly from Adobe Acrobat 9.3.1 (Windows 7, 64 bit). The only scanner I can find in dropdown is WIA. I do not see the twain driver - even though I can scan with twain driver in the HP scanning application. The problem i am experiencing is that when I scan directly from Acrobat (using the only dropdown available - WIA - ) the scan is "legal size" and not "letter size." The only option for paper size is to select paper size automatically.
I would very much like to be able to scan directly from Acrobat and have letter size documents appear as letter size documents. Please help.

Try this, it worked for me in Acrobat v.8
Start an Acrobat scan.
In "Acrobat Scan" window select "Scanner Options"
In "Scanner Options" window select "User interface: Show Scanner's Native Interface"
Click OK on "Scanner Options" window
Click Scan on "Acrobat Scan" window
Next you will be asked to save the PDF file. After this a window should open that gives you an option to select paper size and document type.
I found locations in my HP Printer/Scanner to set paper size but I don't think the information is passed from the printer to Acrobat. I suspect it is an HP problem but they are total dolts about doing anything but pointing the fingure at Adobe.
Hope this works for you. It is very cumbersome but it yields the right results.

Can I download Adobe Photoshop CS2 legally from Adobe's link?

Dear Adobe Community,
The following link shows how to get Adobe Photoshop CS2 "legally" http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/how-to-get-photoshop-for-free/
The conditions from Adobe are that you must have either purchased the license perviously or have bought Reader 7 beforehand. I know certainly that I have not bought Photoshop CS2 before, so I don't know if I can still purchase it.
Ethically, it feels wrong to get the download however practically I need it for school and I don't have a lot of money. I'm trying to do the right thing here, can anybody suggest what to do?
Thanks!

Yeah, that's what I am worried about. I guess I will just pass. As for the prices, they are still too high. I just needed the software for school projects and charity work - yet price is still a roadblock.
I think they should legalize it for nonlicensed members. I could certainly benefit from this and thereby indirectly benefit others.

Is it legal to sell photos edited in trial and beta verisons of Photoshop?

I recently downloaded the new CS6 beta version of photoshop and since I am interested in stock photography I was wondering if it's legal and not againts Adobe's rules to sell photos edited in trial and beta versions of Photoshop? I mean, since you haven't bought them and just trying them out.
I really haven't found info about it, yet. Adobe terms and policy are little overwhelming
Thanks.
p.s. I hope I asked the question on the right place

The last time that I read the EULA, the only restriction on commercial or production work was on beta/pre-release software. So you could use the CS5 trial but not the CS6 beta.
See section 4.a . here:
http://www.adobe.com/misc/terms.html

Itunes é legal, mas quando está sincronizando é um lixo, nem isso pq minha lixeira levanta a tampa mais rápido que o itunes!

itunes é legal, mas quando está sincronizando é um lixo, nem isso porque minha lixeira levanta a tampa mais rápido que o itunes... ¬¬
Quando você coloca ele pra sincronizar por exempolo com o iphone (qualquer versão), o itunes deixa de ser um player e vira dor de cabeça, além de lento pra sincronizar ele fica travando, dando lag, erros e por ai vai... (onde está a qualidade da apple, acho que foi toda pra outro lugar porque o itunes... aff)
Uso o itunes a mais de 4 anos e até hoje nunca resolveram esse problema... porque será?
Bem, eu n sei, mas isso me fez usar outros programas em vez do itunes (ex:iphone pc suite) que é 1.000.000x melhor!!! (sério!)
Apenas indico itunes para quem não tem produtos apple, porque se ele tiver ele vai saber do que estou falando...
Então ta ai galera, quem gostou comenta, quem não gostou pode comentar também, e deixe sempre sua opnião.
Abraço a todos.

Itunes é uma beleza enquanto você não precisa formatar o computador... se vc precisar recuperar dados, começa seu tormento. Essa Apple devia manter toda sua equipe de desenvolvimento de hardware e demitir todos os responsáveis pelos softwares... muita complicação por nada. Se você tem um ipod, tem mais de um computador e acorda um dia querendo copiar um cd num outro micro que não o original, a hora que vc espeta o ipod no outro itunes, ele começa a apagar todos seus dados ou copia todas suas músicas pro outro computador... meu.. q merda... não é só copiar o que é novo pro Ipod? Inventam muita coisa que só faz o usuário passar raiva.

I buy adobe creative suite for teachers and students about one year ago but now i'm not longer a student. Can I still use this programs legally for commercial purposes or do I have to buy some upgrades or something like this? Please help

I buy adobe creative suite for teachers and students about one year ago but now i'm not longer a student. Can I still use this programs legally for commercial purposes or do I have to buy some upgrades or something like this? Please help

The license did not have use restrictions Licenses and terms of use | Adobe
BUT... when your one year Education account ends, I do not think you will be able to renew at the Education rate

HR/Legal Investigation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for