HU assignment to Outbound Delivery

Hi Experts,
I am facing a problem with the assignment of HU to Outbound Deliveries.
I'm working with WM module.
When my HU get to my shipping area (standard 916 with dynamic storage bin), it is assigned to the Outbound Delivery.
In my process, I delete the assignment to the outbound delivery in order to pack the belonging HUs (box) into another HU (palet).
Then this palet is put in another Storage Type until we want to post the Goods Issue.
The problem is that I cannot assign back the HU to the Outbound Delivery.
The systems tells me that I need to do another TO for this Outbound Delivery.
The Outbound Delivery does modify the picking quantity nor the picking status when we delete assignment, and I cannot create another TO.
Does anyone has an idea on how I could manage to reassign the HU to the Outbound Delivery.
Thanks in advance,
Best Regards.
Remi

Hello,
I did what you described me in your answer but my problem is still the same.
When HU is in Storage Type 923 and Storage Bin PACK.BIN, when I try to do the HU02 transaction, the system tells me that it is impossible to repack, because my HU is already assigned to an Outbound Delivery.
Message HUFUNCTIONS 191.
If you have another idea or if I am missing something please tell me !
Thanks very for your help.
Regards,
Remi

Similar Messages

  • Purchase Order assigned in Outbound Delivery - GI GR simultaneously

    Hi all,
    I kindly ask you how to customize the assignment of Purchase order in outbound delivery.
    Trough this link system allows you to carry out at the same time a goods issue (referred to the delivery) and a goods receipt (referred to the PO).
    In delivery exists a folder called "Purchase Assignment" in which the link is carried out.
    My suspect is that does not need customizing, is something SAP native.
    Thanks a lot

    Hi Ivan,
    I dont know about Substitution but you can use the User Exits available in SD for Billing documents Release to Accounting. In the user exist, you can write your coding to determine the Cost Center from the Profit Center. The relationship between Cost Center and Profit Center is maintained in table CSKS.
    You can use the following user exits available in SD module for release to Accounting
    EXIT_SAPLV60B_004
    EXIT_SAPLV60B_008
    Please read the documentation of the exits before using.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Mahendra
    Assign points if it helps

  • Dump in WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE outbound delivery

    HI
    Need help in using WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE - I have coded in output type shipment.
    When i do MIGO with respect  to STO ,outp type will be triggered and handling units should assign to outbound delivery .
    but it gives shor dump .
    00 671: ABAP/4 processor: ROLLBACK_IN_POSTING
    Update was terminated
    using below parameters :
    WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE
    VBKOK_WA-VBELN_VL = 183000150
    VBKOK_WA-WABUC = 'X'
    DELIVERY = 183000150
    UPDATE_PICKING = 'X'
    NICHT_SPERREN  = 'X'
    IT_HANDLING_UNITS-TOP_HU_EXTERNAL = 340469890000001222
    and delivery no is shown while doing migo but due to termination rollback is happening.
    please help in doing this ,i have search in sdn but no suitable post.

    Hi Garun,
    You can try like this....
    tb_VBKOK-VBELN_VL = vbeln
    tb_VBPOK-VBELN_VL =  vbeln
    tb_VBPOK-POSNR_VL =  posnr
    APPEND tb_VBPOK.
    CALL FUNCTION 'WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE'
    EXPORTING
    VBKOK_WA = tb_VBKOK
    SYNCHRON = ' '
    NO_MESSAGES_UPDATE = ' '
    COMMIT = ' '
    DELIVERY = tb_vbkok-VBELN_VL
    NICHT_SPERREN = 'X'
    TABLES
    VBPOK_TAB = tb_VBPOK.
    COMMIT WORK
    regards,
    Lokesh

  • HU not coming when create inbound delivery via outbound delivery using SPED

    Hi experts,
    In my synario  :::issue : Handling units from  outbound delivery are not transferred to  the automatic created inbound    delivery using SPED output type.
    Error when HU is assigned manually     ::Handling unit 10000013565 is already assigned to outbound delivery 87005777.
    Can somebody solve my probeleam or is there any sap note availavle to solve this probleam.I am using ecc 6.0 environment.
    Thanks
    subhasis

    We have the same issue. Please post the resolution. Thanks.

  • Delete assignment of HU from outbound delivery (VL02N) not working

    Hi All
    I have searched many threads to find the solution to be above problem but none of them was working for me, so posting the query again.
    I hava a dummy pick HU that I create for some purpose, finally i want to delete the assignment of the HU in the outbound delivery.(not to delete the HU completely). For me, the assignment of the HU vanishes from outbound delivery with 3 FM's. 'HU_GET_HUS' , 'V51P_DELETE_RELATIONSHIP' and 'HU_POST'.
    The problem is, when i PGI the delivery, the HU appears again in VL03N. I am not able to understand this strange behavior.
    I have tried all FM's like bapi_hu_delete etc, but they delete teh HU completely which is not my req. I heard abt this FM BAPI_HU_DELETE_FROM_DEL, but am workng in Ecc 5.0 and the FM doesnt exist.
    Pls help
    Thanks

    Hemanth,
    I recall that we used to update the HU status as well when we dissociated HU from delivery,  though can't remember the reason now.
    Pls check the VEKP-STATUS for HU after you have done with these 3 FM calls, I believe you have to update the status to 'BLANK' with the help of some FM, try it first if it works for you by direct updating it in table in Dev.
    BR,
    Diwakar

  • Handling Unit not being assigned to TO for an outbound delivery

    Hi All
    When I create a TO for an outbound delivery then a handling unit is not being assigned to the TO.
    I cannot confirm the TO as it complains about the non assignment of HU.
    I have done the following so far:
    1. Set up a default packing material w.r.t WhNo and movement type.
    2. Defined a packing group and then assigned the packing group to the packing material.
    3. Set 1 to the indicator for automatic HU creaion in customizations for automatic HU creation.
    Is there something I am missing in the configuration?
    Any suggestions would help.
    Thanks,
    Arup

    Hello,
    HU never get assign at the time of creation of TO. You can assign pick HU at the time of confirmation of TO. There are two ways
    Use transaction code LH01 and assign pick HU
          OR
    (ii)Or at the time of confirmation of TO click on pack tab and complete the packing
    Thanks,
    Milind C

  • STO - Unpack HU assigned to an outbound delivery

    Hi SAP experts,
    I'm trying to unpack a HU assigned to an outbound delivery created for a STO.
    The material packed is WM managed.
    I would like to know what are the steps to perform ?
    - I've created and confirmed a TO from 916 to 923 with LT09 transaction
    - What are the nexte steps ?
    I've read what's mentioned in this link Repacking Unpacking of Handling unit material but I don't succeed with HU02 ? How am I suppose to use it to unpack ?
    Regards,
    Bahia
    Edited by: Bahia M. on Jul 26, 2011 10:31 AM

    Hi,
    In VL02N, go to Edit--->pack.
    Select the HU and  "delete assignement" and save the delivery.
    Unpacking is done.
    Later put the HU back in the original storage bin by creating the TO in LT09
    please let me know if this is not what you are looking for
    regards

  • Serial number assignment to batch split position in outbound delivery

    Hello All,
    I have a question for which I can't find any answer even though I have been struggling through several forums, etc. Let me explain it:
    I create a outbound delivery for material XYZ which is batch managed and serial number managed. An automatic batch determination takes place. Thus a batch split is created for the main item 10. Since the serial number is required, I enter the serial number for the batch split position 900001. Press enter and save.
    The problem is, that afterwards the batch split positions aren't shown in the Batch split screen using transaction VL02N (the batch split positions and also the serial number can be displayed via VL03N). The issue is that the serial number entered cannot be removed nor the batch split can be changed anymore.
    Message VL429: Batch/Val.type split only possible if no serial numbers are maintained.
    It seems to be a standard SAP functionality, but a little bit tricky. Can anybody help me?
    1. How can I remove the serial number assignment for a batch split position?
    2. Is there any customizing setting with which I could perhaps deactivate the check?
    Thanks a lot in advance. Any input is appreciatted!

    Hi,
    issue has been solved at last. The batch split indicator can be used to display the batch structure of an item. And here the serial number can be removed as well.

  • Function to Delete assignment of HU from outbound delivery in VL02n

    Hi,
    in my scenario the objective is delete assignment from the delivery and not cancel the HU.
    Using the functions
    HU_GET_HUS
    V51P_DELETE_RELATIONSHIP
    HU_POST
    I can delete assignmento of  the HU from the delivery but when I want to cancel the delivery into VL02n and return tells me that this is not possible because there are still  HU attributed to the delivery.
    There are alternatives to these functions, or to accidentally enter data into these in order to solve the problem?
    Thanks

    Hemanth,
    I recall that we used to update the HU status as well when we dissociated HU from delivery,  though can't remember the reason now.
    Pls check the VEKP-STATUS for HU after you have done with these 3 FM calls, I believe you have to update the status to 'BLANK' with the help of some FM, try it first if it works for you by direct updating it in table in Dev.
    BR,
    Diwakar

  • Output types are not getting displayed in Outbound Delivery in Display mode

    Hello,
    The actual requirement is that output types should get attched to the outbound delivery when we do GI(Good Issue) on the outbound delivery.
    So, I have created an outbound delivery and did GI on it through IDoc. But, I can not see output types on the delivery (To see output types, go to Extra -> Output -> Header in VL03N) in the display mode. However, I can see in change mode (VL02N).
    Could you please suggest the solution for this?

    Hi sreeram,
    go to crm -> transactions -> basic settings -> define transaction types
    copy default email cx03 and create new zemail.
    assign that zemail to bus2000126 business activity.select the business activity and click on customizing header.assign the category email. click on channel. maintain the channels 1)GUI crm webclient UI, 2)ICW Interaction center webclient.
    save the changes.
    go to crm -> transactions -> basic settings -> settings for activities -> maintain categories, goals, priorities -> click on assign categories to transaction types.
    assign the category email(which you have assigned above) to the transaction type zemail.
    even check maintain categories as well
    click on maintain categories -> check 401 email assigned to class G email.
    Regards
    Krishna

  • Problem with IDoc for an outbound delivery

    Dear All,
    I am facing a problem with the IDoc defined for an outbound delivery.
    Scenario:
    Implementation of a small enhancement for an IDoc (DESADV, DELVRY01) created for an outbound delivery (in VL02N).
    What I did:
    I implemented the EXIT_SAPLV56K_002 exit in the V56K0001 enhancement, activated in SMOD, assigned V56K0001 component in CMOD and acivated it. Then I put a breakpoint on the ZXTRKU02 include. For me everything in SMOD and CMOD looks OK.
    I have also created a partner profile, port, outbound message config. (message DESADV, basic type DELVRY01, application V2, output message type LAVA, process code DELV. function module used for this process code is IDOC_OUTPUT_DELVRY).
    What I can do:
    I can issue an IDoc message, it looks ok and contains the standard data.
    Problem:
    It seems that the enhancement does not work. Finally I put there only one line of code to avoid a program bug and just to check . The system does not stop at the breakpoint (set on the ZXTRKU02 include in the EXIT_SAPLV56K_002 exit).
    Am I using the proper exit? I appreciate any suggestions.
    Thanks,
    Grzegorz Skorus

    Hello Grzegorz
    Not an expert on this, but noone is responding so I thought let me try and help you. You seem to be doing the right things as mentioned in OSS note 1498409.
    Firstly since this can be called form Shipment Idoc also, you may need to make a differentiation by the interface parameter 'MESSAGE_TYPE' or segment name. See the attached OSS note, though it belongs to older releases,  it may help you.
    Also help says 'The callup of this function module is programmed for each enhancement of the internal table for the IDoc (in other words, when you add an extra segment'. So may be you need to add an extra segment/field to make it work.
    Futher  the user exits are replaced by BADIs. May be you should use exit_badi_v56k.
    Hope this helps and others will pitch in.
    1498409 - Valuation Type unavailable when creating deliveries using IDOC
    631913 - Exit after formatting delivery IDoc type DELVRY

  • Prevent Outbound delivery creation in sales orders with delivery block

    Hi gurus
         We are facing the following issue:
         Some sales orders have delivery block header and once they are saved an outbound delivery document is created; we want SAP system creates outbound deliveries only in those cases were sales orders have not a delivery block in header, is there any option or configuration we can use in order to prevent the creation of these documents?
    Regards,
    Edgar.

    Well Edgar,
    let's see then in spro
    Logistics Execution->Shipping->Deliveries->Define Reasons for Blocking in Shipping
    Check out the configuration of your delivery block reason and pay special attention to this instruction:
    "In sales documents, you can either enter delivery blocks manually at header level (business data in the sales document header) or they can be proposed automatically by the system. In the latter case, the delivery block must be entered in the respective sales document type (see chapter
    "Define sales document types"). In addition, the delivery block in the sales document header is only effective if the delivery block has been assigned to the respective delivery type."
    It must be something in the configuration of the delivery block reason you're using.
    Regards,
    Edgar

  • How to unassign handling unit in outbound delivery?

    (Don't Want to delete HU onlu unassign it from delivery: WM requirement)
    I would like to unassign HU in an outbound delivery.
    code i'm using make the handling unit disappear in the overview of HU.
    but corresponding line in the "item overview" are still existing.
    And when I want to copy pack quantities as delivery quantities, system tell me that "50.000 M have already been packed. Quantity cannot be changed. "
    How can I do, to do as if i pushed button "delete assignment" in HU overview?
    Here the code I'm using:
    CALL FUNCTION 'HU_PACKING_REFRESH'.
    CALL FUNCTION 'HU_GET_HUS'
    EXPORTING
    if_lock_hus = 'X'
    it_venum = I_VENUM "it_venum contains l_venum
    IMPORTING
    ET_ITEM_SERIALNO = o_item_serialno .
    CALL FUNCTION 'V51P_DELETE_RELATIONSHIP'
    EXPORTING
    IF_CONTROL = 'X'
    IT_HUS = i_venum
    IMPORTING
    ET_NEW_HUS = LT_HUS
    et_messages = lt_messages
    EXCEPTIONS
    FATAL_ERROR = 01 .
    CALL FUNCTION 'HU_POST' .
    call function 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.
    Please let me know the function module if anybody has idea to unassign from delivery.
    Edited by: Akshay Kale on May 4, 2010 7:04 AM

    Hi Akshay,
    This question is marked as Answered , can you please let me know how you have resolved this error .
    My Requirement is to remove HU assignment from inbound Delivery . If possible can u provide me the code snapshot to remove assignment for inbound delivery.

  • Language of material description in Outbound Delivery

    Hi,
    I have created an STO for a new Greek customer Plant and the communication language in the customer master data for this plant was set to Greek.
    As consequence, my Outbound Deliveries from an Italian Plant have been created with a Material Description in Greek...In the meantime, I changed the communication language in the customer master data to english to have the description in english for any new outbound delivery created...
    I deleted the deliveries with wrong language and tried to re-create them after this language change but the problem is still the same (material description in Greek).
    So, it seems that the customer language taken into account is the one that was assigned to the customer at the time the STO was created...The language change will only solve my future documents (STO) so I am looking for a way to correct my deliveries already created as I can not cancel my STO...
    Thanks,
    KAK

    Hi,
    Thanks for reply. But I dont think this works. In another instance of SAP where this functionality is working, I have checked the Item usage and its not CHSP. It is V and batch split is happening.
    Still, I will try once and let u know if this works.
    Regards,
    Vishal

  • Error while doing outbound delivery against Purchase Order

    hello
    i m getting error while doing Outbound delivery for purchase order as follows
    EKPO-SOBKZ=E; EKPO-UMSOK=_; EKPO-KZBWS<>_ EKPO-KZVBR<>E (Note 305582) not supported (check your entry)
    Message no. M7146, i m not getting wht will be the reason,
    Regards
    NISHJ

    Please go through the note - 305582. It is clearly given the direction.
    Symptom
    You try to post a goods movement for a stock transport order from the unrestricted-use stock into the sales order stock or project stock.
    During the goods issue, the system displays error message M7146 with a text along the lines of "EKPO-SOBKZ=E; EKPO-KZVBR<>E; ... not supported".
    Cause and prerequisites
    In the goods issue for the stock transport order, the system may have to create a stock in transit which is deconstructed during the goods receipt. If the withdrawal takes place from the special stock, it is clear which is the receiving stock.
    However, if the withdrawal is carried out from the unrestricted-use stock ("Collective requirements", controlled by the dependent requirements indicator MARC-SBDKZ in the material master of the issuing plant), this results in the design problem that the control tables of the goods movement do not have any key field for the receiving stock. Therefore, the control for the receiving stock is controlled via the consumption indicator in the account assignment category of the purchase order. The consumption indicator therefore requires a specific default setting (you may have assumed you could change the design of these control tables, however this is not possible).
    Using an inappropriate consumption indicator then causes for the goods issue an incorrect or no stock in transit to be created so that the goods receipt fails.
    Solution
    Implement the program change in accordance with the correction instructions.
    Afterwards implement Note 413908 immediately if this is relevant for your release.

Maybe you are looking for

  • IP address on HP officejet pro L7590

    Hello We have lost all setting on our printer. It says IP address is 0.0.0.0. Can someone help and advise how to reset it to 10.0.0.10.  Thx This question was solved. View Solution.

  • Using IN Operator in Sql

    How can I run the following query with multiple parameters. Select empno,ename from emp where (empno,ename) in (7369,'SMITH',7900,'JAMES') What am I missing ? Best Regards, Luqman

  • No trackpad cursor on starup

    Trackpad coursor disappear during starup on a two month old Macbook pro,so there is no way to select the user and start the machine.

  • Premiere Elements 3.0 Endlosschleife

    Die DVD soll nach Abspielen des Filmes alleine wieder von vorne anfangen, d.h in einer Endlosschleife laufen. Wie geht das?

  • Repository login failed for user

    Hello everyone, I have some errors to log on the local repository. please see the attach file. In fact, the repository looks like the common repository for the test. So I adds the "full control" right to several USER GROUPs in this repostiory via CMC