Idoc File to File scenario mapping problem
Dear All,
I am working on File to File scenario in which my source xml file is having multiple deliveries Idoc structure to which I want to convert into output structure as required.
In my source file there is possibility that there can be multiple delivery idocs for the same delivery number so i want to pick all the data for the unique deliveries and if same delivery number repeats then the delivery created last should only be picked without considering others.
Please guide me in mapping this scenario.
Regards,
NJ
Hi,
Use the below UDF.
Set set = new HashSet(Arrays.asList(var1));
String[] array2 = (String[])(set.toArray(new String[set.size()]));
Arrays.sort(array2);
for (int i = 0; i < array2.length; i++) {
result.addValue(array2<i>);
Map like below:
source fieldremove contextUDF--Target(delivery number )
Regards,
Prakasu.M
Edited by: prakasu on Jun 2, 2009 6:43 PM
Similar Messages
-
JDBC to IDOC scenario - Mapping problem with E1FIBSEG
Hi friends,
I have problem when generate multiple Idocs (FIDCC1) an multiple positions based on an External Definition for a SQL Server table. I have selected all fields from this table from a SELECT into the JDBC configuration.
My mapping is like this:
DWCAJA.ResultSet 1..1
IDOC.
Thats ok and generate n IDOCs by every change of PK.
The problem is when i want to map positions because i dont have any field in source message to identify the number of positions to map with E1FISEG.
If I have two differents Pks and n rows, the result of testing is as folow:
FIDCC1
IDOC
E1FIKPF
E1FISEG
E1FISEG
IDOC
E1FIKPF
I cant obtain n BSEG segments according PK. I've mapped and all fields of row segment but those are created in the first IDOC node only,
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Pablo.-Important: Primary key : DWSucCod + DWCajSec
Payload:
- <row>
<DWSucCod>11</DWSucCod>
<DWCajSec>1</DWCajSec>
<DWCtaConCo>1100001</DWCtaConCo>
<DWRecImp>100</DWRecImp>
</row>
- <row>
<DWSucCod>11</DWSucCod>
<DWCajSec>1</DWCajSec>
<DWCtaConCo>1100002</DWCtaConCo>
<DWRecImp>200</DWRecImp>
</row>
Result:
IDOC
E1FIKPF
E1FISEG
hkont :1100001
dmbtr : 100
E1FISEG
hkont :1100002
dmbtr : 200
Payload:
- <row>
<DWSucCod>11</DWSucCod>
<DWCajSec>1</DWCajSec>
<DWCtaConCo>1100002</DWCtaConCo>
<DWRecImp>200</DWRecImp>
</row>
- <row>
<DWSucCod>12</DWSucCod>
<DWCajSec>1</DWCajSec>
<DWCtaConCo>1100003</DWCtaConCo>
<DWRecImp>300</DWRecImp>
</row>
Result:
IDOC
E1FIKPF
E1FISEG
hkont :1100002
dmbtr : 200
IDOC
E1FIKPF
E1FISEG
hkont :1100001
dmbtr : 300
Payload:
- <row>
<DWSucCod>11</DWSucCod>
<DWCajSec>1</DWCajSec>
<DWCtaConCo>1100001</DWCtaConCo>
<DWRecImp>100</DWRecImp>
</row>
- <row>
<DWSucCod>11</DWSucCod>
<DWCajSec>1</DWCajSec>
<DWCtaConCo>1100002</DWCtaConCo>
<DWRecImp>200</DWRecImp>
</row>
- <row>
<DWSucCod>12</DWSucCod>
<DWCajSec>1</DWCajSec>
<DWCtaConCo>1100003</DWCtaConCo>
<DWRecImp>300</DWRecImp>
</row>
Result:
IDOC
E1FIKPF
E1FISEG
hkont :1100001
dmbtr : 100
E1FISEG
hkont :1100002
dmbtr : 200
IDOC
E1FIKPF
E1FISEG
hkont :1100003
dmbtr : 300 -
IDOC DELVRY05 TO EDI 856 - Mapping problem
Hi all,
i'm currently working on a outbound mapping with the delivery idoc (DELVRY05) and the EDI 856 (Advance Shipping Notice Definition)
The problem is that i can't map the items for every pack in the structure because the ocurrency doesn't match.
The EDI 856 has a segment called G_SHL (ocurrence 0.200000), that i replicated 4 times for shipping, order, pack and item data
And this segment has a subsegment called G_SHL/S_HL (ocurrence 0.1)
RESULT DESIRED GIVEN BY THE CLIENT: (1 pack/1item)
3 HL1*S~ ======> S: shipping, 1 hierarchy)
4 TD1CTN251***G223.997*LB~
5 TD5*2ABFSM*CC~
6 REFBM003030987~
7 REFCN086044619~
8 DTM01120080128*180610~
9 DTM06720080204~
10 FOB*PP~
11 N1SFStiefel Labs~
12 N4DULUTHGA*30096~
13 HL21*O~ ======> O: order, 2 hierarchy, 1 was the previous hierarchy)
14 PRF*4064561~
15 HL32*P~ ======> P : Pack, 3 hierarchy, 2 was the previous hierarchy
16 MANGM00000734620052976193~
17 HL43*I~ ======> I: Item , 4 hierchay, 3 was the previous hierarchy
31 LIN*UP073462150651LT45X5147ND00145150605~
32 SN1*12EA~
33 DTM03620090930~
34 HL52*P~ ======> P : Pack, 5 hierarchy, 2 was the previous hierarchy
35 MANGM00000734620052975189~
36 HL65*I~ ======> I: Item , 6 hierchay, 5 was the previous hierarchy
37 LIN*UP073462150651LT45X5147ND00145150605~
38 SN1*12EA~
39 DTM03620090930~
40 HL72*P~ ======> P : Pack,7 hierarchy, 2 was the previous hierarchy
41 MANGM00000734620052975196~
42 HL87*I~ ======> I: Item , 8 hierarchay, 7 was the previous hierarchy
43 LIN*UP073462150651LT45X5147ND00145150605~
44 SN1*12EA~
45 DTM03620090930~
46 CTT*8~
47 SE479220014~
As u see, all packs belong to "2 hierarchy" (order), and items to their correposding pack
(has a comment, the "hierarchy number" is always given by a counter so u won't find the exact number again)
so, the client wants us to create an structure that is like this..
1º Pack
1º item
2º item
2º Pack
1º item
2º item
(the example has only one item, but they say that is going to be with many items)
- The problem is that the structure data of the Idoc doesnt match EDI 856 structure
E1EDL37 (0.99999) -
Pack data -
G_SHL (0.200000)
E1EDL37/E1EDL44 (0.99999) -
Item data -
G_SHL/HL (0.1) <====
i was doing different G_SHL for pack and items but that leaves me with a wrong structure, and with all the hierarchy data wrong for items (since the mapping can't see which item belong to his pack)
1º Pack
2º Pack
3º Pack
1º Item
2º Item
3º Item
- How can i map the structure Pack/item if in the idoc got too many item positions for only one EDI corresponding segment??
Thanks in advance!Alains,
We have the same tear, pack and item problem with one of our customer in one of my project. To acheive this result with the standard schema is not possible because this is a custom one.
So I would suggest to change the schema in BIC like the occurrence and within the third G_SHL you should have S_HL and within this you should have a S_HL so that for every pack you will have multipe items.
The bottom line is to have the schema as required by your mapping. Once you change the schema deploy the maps in J2EE and use them else it will throw an error in RWB.
Regards,
---Satish -
Regarding receiver determination problem in IDOC-XI-XML file scenario
Dear All ,
In IDOC-XI-xml file scenario , I have configured SLD , IR . But in ID , after file adapter , reciever agreement configuration when I am doing receiver determination configuration I am not able to insert mapping program in configuration overview of receiver determination as I am not getting "New Specific" option in mapping .
Can anybody suggest what could be the reason behind this .
Thanks in Advance
PrabhatHi PRabhat,
In RCVR determination, you need to select the party & service (as appropriate) save the obeject
then refresh the configuration overview of recr det.
then you can see the partner/service
then you can open it & add the necessary objects.
Regards
Vishnu -
Mapping problem in file to multiple file scenario
Hi all,
i am doing a file to file scenario in which the occurence of target is 0 to 1 .I changed the occurence of the tatrget as 0 to 1 in message mapping.But after this change i am not getting my xml output .previously i was getting it but now in moni its showing message suceesfull but xml output is not generating its genrating only <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
<ns0:Message1 />
</ns0:Messages>.....In moni before message mapping i am getting all my xml input but after message mapping its not generating xml output .All other mapping is one to one...just i have to check if one structure occurs in input file then it has to generate the output file(even if i copy the input from moni to IR then its work there) .it was working when i had not changed the occurence as 0 to1...Please guide me to crack this problem.
Regards,
SaurabhHi Raj/Swarup,
my input str is MT_ANALYSIS
Recordset
Rsetxt
field1
field2
Rseche
field1
field2
output str is:MT_HEADER
Header
field1
field2
MT_HEADER file(o/p) is created if Rsetxt occurs in inbound str
i used creatif & exist standard function to achieve it. It was creating the xml output when Rsetxt occurs ,but the problem was when it does not occurs it was throwing error as the occurence of MT_HEADER was bydefault 1,when i changed the occurence in message mapping to 0 to 1 then two extra structre messages
message1 occured in my mapping and it was not genrating any output xml,that i checked in moni.I message mapping(test) it is working and creating the xml with the same input.I am totally confused with this strange problem.
Regards
Saurabh -
Mapping Problem(file to 2 basic idocs)
Hi,
In my scenario sender File(divided into 3 parts) and receiver 2 basic IDOCS
I am having the conditions,
1) file field Trans_id(part-1 field) = 20 or 30 then only entire mapping required to transfer the file fields into SAP.(total scenario required to execute)
a)In that po_no( part-2 field) is coming from file then need to map part-2 fields of file to one idoc.
else need to map (file part1 and 2) fields to same IDOC-A
b)If all the fields of part-2 and part-3 equal then part-1 and part-2 fields to one IDOC-A and Part-3 fields to another IDOC-B.
which mapping is suggested to achive the requirement and procedure.
Thanks,
Praveen.hi,
i Hope useful to you
/people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2005/06/09/walkthrough-with-bpm - Walk through BPM
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/05/22/schedule-your-bpm - Schedule BPM
/people/sriram.vasudevan3/blog/2005/01/11/demonstrating-use-of-synchronous-asynchronous-bridge-to-integrate-synchronous-and-asynchronous-systems-using-ccbpm-in-sap-xi - Use of Synch - Asynch bridge
in ccBPM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] - Use of Synch - Asynch bridge
in ccBPM
Regards -
IDoc to Flat file scenario - abap mapping
Hi All,
I have to do some IDOC to Flat file scenarios. In Order to generate the file in required format I will have to add all segments(Nodes) of Idoc in FCC receiver. We also have other option of doing it through ABAP Mapping which I found in one blog.
Now my question is : Is it better way of doing it through FCC or ABAP Mapping?
Ofcourse from development point of view ABAP Mapping looks easier as FCC is very time consuming task.
Is there and performance issues in either of the approach?
Thanks and Regards,
AtulHi VJ and Harald,
Thanks for your replies.
I am not having PI7.1 however the given blog was very informative.
I will try using file port approach as suggested.
Thanks and Regards,
Atul -
I have a scenario, ECC-PI-Message broker. ECC sending IDOC to PI, PI execute mapping and sends data to Message borker(thru JMS channel).(with almost one to one mapping)., IDOC(AAE)-PI-JMS. Now my requirement is., from PI after mapping we need to create file with same data what ever send to Message broker and put the file in SAP folder without touching mapping. Is it possible? Please advise with the steps. We are using the ICO for this senario. Quick response is appriciated.
Hi Pratik,
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/502991a2-45d9-2910-d99f-8aba5d79fb42?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
This link might help.
regards
Anupam -
IDOC TO HTML FILE SCENARIO WITH XSLT MAPPING
Hi ,
I am doing idoc to html file using xslt mapping can anyone provide me some help(material or example ) please reply soon.
Thanks & Regards,
Vinay YadavHi ,
For xslt mapping the place to start is
http://www.w3schools.com/.
in help.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/83/2200cb50d345c793336d9a1683163e/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/a4/64b93d0d4e6b3be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
There are some blogs here which can proove to be good.
/people/pooja.pandey/blog/2005/06/27/xslt-mapping-with-java-enhancement-for-beginners
/people/pooja.pandey/blog/2005/06/27/xslt-mapping-with-java-enhancement-for-beginners
https://weblogs.sdn.sap.com/pub/wlg/3823 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
Regards ,
Deepak
/people/anish.abraham2/blog/2005/12/22/file-to-multiple-idocs-xslt-mapping -
Idoc to Multiple file scenario
Hi Experts,
My scenario is IDOC to Multiple files..
IDOC will be triggered from the ECC system and i have three differient structures and need to drop those 3 files in the ftp server at the target system.
Here we can use multimapping for such scenario but the problem here is ..
In my scenario for all the 3 mappings i am using combination of message mapping and xslt mapping as below
1st case:
Idoc -
Message mapping -
Target First File.
XSLT Mapping1
XSLT Mapping2
XSLT Mapping3
XSLT Mapping4 -
The output of the xslt 4th mapping will go to the target ftp server
In similar for the other 2 mappings also uses the combination of messag mapping and xslt mapping.
Here as the receiver system is one in the interface determination (PI 7.1-- NO Enhanced determination)when i add these operation mapping in the interface determination when i execute the scenario all the operation mappings are not getting executed.
For example;; If the first target file has no records then it is not executing the 2nd operaion mapping, does the occurence of the operation mapping needs to changed.
could anyone suggest on this..
Thanks,
saiHi,
Why cannot you use three mappings when you want to generate the three files for the same input instead of multimapping as the multimapping generates either of the three messages only...
you can later provide the condition at the interface determination to execute the mappings if not all mappings to be executed..
if there are no conditions provided by you at the interface determination level then mappings will get executed automatically..
provided your mapping is working fine..so in your case check /test the message mapping..
HTH
Rajesh -
Mapping problem due to FCC in sender file adapter
Hi All
I am doing File( Flat File ) to RFC Scenario.it is working fine..
the problem comes in mapping with multiple records.
FCC at sender file adapter is used
my Data Type are :
Source DT Target RFC import parameter(table).
E2ED20* ITEM*
KEY VBELN
VBELN POSNR
E2E24* CHARG
KEY
POSNR
CHARG
<b>*->>multiple occurence
E2ED20 and E2E24 are 2 segment ,KEY is used in FCC to identify E2EDL20 & E2EDL24</b>
My source text file is like this :
E2EDL20 0200
E2EDL24 xyz
E2EDL20 0201
E2EDL24 abc
E2EDL24 efg
E2EDL24 mln
E2EDL20 0202
E2EDL24 gty
so the payload should be :
0200 xyz
0201 abc
0201 efg
0201 mln
0202 gty
in <i>FCC ignoer record set= true</i>
otherwise is not called...
i try to use split by value & use oneasmany , not helpfull.
in message mapping when i checked th field VBELN -> display queue
i am getting an array 0200
0201
0202 in white fields
thanks & regards
Ashutosh Rawat<b>Source payload</b>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns:MT_MATNO_FILE xmlns:ns="urn:abc:xxx">
- <E2ED20>
<KZ>E2EDL20</KZ>
<FIELD1>020</FIELD1>
<b><VBELN>0083662685</VBELN></b>
</E2ED20>
- <E2E24>
<KZ>E2EDL24</KZ>
<FIELD2>020</FIELD2>
<POSNR>900001</POSNR>
<CHARG>1078629</CHARG>
<LFIMG>3200</LFIMG>
<MEINS>PCE</MEINS>
</E2E24>
- <E2E24>
<KZ>E2EDL24</KZ>
<FIELD2>020</FIELD2>
<POSNR>900002</POSNR>
<CHARG>1078630</CHARG>
<LFIMG>1895</LFIMG>
<MEINS>PCE</MEINS>
</E2E24>
- <E2E24>
<KZ>E2EDL24</KZ>
<FIELD2>020</FIELD2>
<POSNR>900003</POSNR>
<CHARG>1079145</CHARG>
<LFIMG>1883</LFIMG>
<MEINS>PCE</MEINS>
</E2E24>
- <E2E24>
<KZ>E2EDL24</KZ>
<FIELD2>020</FIELD2>
<POSNR>900004</POSNR>
<CHARG>1079146</CHARG>
<LFIMG>3195</LFIMG>
<MEINS>PCE</MEINS>
</E2E24>
- <E2ED20>
<KZ>E2EDL20</KZ>
<FIELD1>020</FIELD1>
<b> <VBELN>0083662648</VBELN></b>
</E2ED20>
- <E2E24>
<KZ>E2EDL24</KZ>
<FIELD2>020</FIELD2>
<POSNR>900011</POSNR>
<CHARG>1001450</CHARG>
<LFIMG>2946</LFIMG>
<MEINS>8PC</MEINS>
</E2E24>
- <E2ED20>
<KZ>E2EDL20</KZ>
<FIELD1>020</FIELD1>
<b> <VBELN>0083673936</VBELN></b> </E2ED20>
- <E2E24>
<KZ>E2EDL24</KZ>
<FIELD2>020</FIELD2>
<POSNR>900012</POSNR>
<CHARG>1073953</CHARG>
<LFIMG>2458</LFIMG>
<MEINS>PCE</MEINS>
</E2E24>
</ns:MT_MATNO_FILE>
<b>at target what required is</b>
<item>
<b><VBELN>0083662685</VBELN></b>
<POSNR>900001</POSNR>
</item>
<item>
<b><VBELN>0083662685</VBELN></b>
<POSNR>900002</POSNR>
</item>
<item>
<b><VBELN>0083662685</VBELN></b>
<POSNR>900003</POSNR>
</item>
<item>
<b><VBELN>0083662685</VBELN></b>
<POSNR>900004</POSNR>
</item>
<item>
<b><VBELN>0083662648</VBELN></b>
<POSNR>900011</POSNR>
</item>
<item>
<b><VBELN>0083673936</VBELN></b>
<POSNR>900012</POSNR>
</item>
in Sender FCC
E2ED20.fieldFixedLengths 7,76
E2ED20.fieldNames KZ,VBELN
E2ED20.keyFieldValue E1EDL20
E2ED20.endSeparator 'nl'
E2E24.fieldFixedLengths 7,24,13,7,3
E2E24.keyFieldValue E1EDL24
E2E24.fieldNames KZ,POSNR,CHARG,LFIMG,MEINS
E2E24.endSeparator 'nl'
ignoreRecordsetName true
source file is already there...
Message was edited by:
ashutosh rawat -
Error in message Mapping(file to file scenario)
Hi friends,
In file to file scenario i am getting error like this while activating standard change list in IR.
Activation of the change list canceled Check result for Message Mapping MM_file2filejuly27 | URN:file2fileJuly27.com:
Starting compilation
Compilation complete
Check result for Software Component Version praba.com | PRABA.COM | 2007 | 0:
The standard error type ExchangeLogData is not defined for the namespace URN:file2fileJuly27.com
Save the software component version definition again. The object is then saved automatically
could you help me out how to correct this error?Prabha,
You should not delete any existing standard Data types provided by SAP. ExchangeLogData and ExchangeDaultData are standard data types get created when you create new namespace.
If you have already deleted then copy them from other Namespace to your namespace. Activate your default data type first and then your objects.
Hope this will solve your problem.
Nilesh -
Error: 1:n multi-mapping using BPM for file to file scenario
Hi. Iu2019m trying to do 1:n multi-mapping using bpm scenario. I use file to file. Input file consists of many records and then I want many record to be transformed into many file at target system. I follow step in http://www.riyaz.net/blog/xipi-1n-multi-mapping-using-bpm/. However, I have a problem when file is retrieved in to XI. It doesnu2019t create any output file.
When I look at SXMB_MONI, it shows u201CNo object type found for the message Check that the corresponding process is activated.u201D Besides, it shows error message "Unable to perform action for selected message" when i clikc at PE in SXMB_MONI.
I have check at many previous posts with the same error message but still couldnu2019t solve it. I already activate my BPM and check that status in SXI_CACHE = 0. There is noting left in change list of my IR and ID.
Here is my design and configuration.
IR
Data Type: DT_file_split -> for both input and output file
Message Type: MT_file_split_sender, MT_file_split_receiver
Message Interface: SI_file_split_in, SI_file_split_out, SI_file_abs_source, SI_file_abs_target
Message mapping: MM_file_split for mapping MT_file_split_sender with MT_file_split_receiver
Interface mapping: OM_file_split
u2022 Source = SI_file_split_out
u2022 Target = SI_file_split_in
u2022 Mapping Program = MM_file_split
BPM following this link http://www.riyaz.net/blog/xipi-1n-multi-mapping-using-bpm/.
ID
Import my Integration process
2 Communication Channel for getting input file (CC_File_split_sender) and creating output file (CC_File_split)
2 Receiver determination:
u2022 Source system to BPM using interface SI_File_Abs_source
u2022 BPM to target system using interface SI_File_Abs_target
1 Interface determination:
u2022 from source system to BPM
u2022 Sender interface: SI_File_Split_Out
u2022 Receiver interface: SI_file_abs_source
1 Sender Agreement
u2022 Commu. Component: Source System
u2022 Using interface: SI_File_Abs_source
u2022 Sender Communication Channel: CC_File_Split_Sender
1 Receiver Agreement
u2022 Sender Communication Component: BPM
u2022 Receiver Communication Component: Target System
u2022 Receiver Interface: SI_File_Split_In
u2022 Receiver Communication Channel: CC_File_Split
Anyone know how to fix this?
Thanks,
PavinHi,
Yes, thats the problem.
You are creating file from test tab of 1..N mapping .
In case of 1..N mappping in mapping Extra tags of messages are addded to the data.As shown here:-
Messages
Message1
MessageType
When you use this mapping to generate xml message then it will add additional tags for <Messages> and <Message1>, which is not correct. it should only have structure of you MT.
So remove start and end tag of <Messages> and <Message1> from your data file. Mentioned below in bold.
<xml......>
<Messages>
<Message1>
<MT_...>
</MT_...>
</Message1>
</Messages>
This should solve your problem.
Regards,
Sami. -
Doubts in SAP(Idoc)-XI-Flat file scenario
Dear All,
I am sending Delivery Idoc from R/3 and I am able to view the Idoc in XI in transaction IDX5. Also i m able to see the XML structure with the data of the idoc in SXMB_MONI.
Now as per my scenario I have to download this to a flat file from XI.
My question is, should I have to do the creation of Data types, message types, mapping interface & interface mapping in IR or should I directly do the designing in the ID.
waiting for your reply.
Warm regards,
N.JainHi,
DT, MT, MI : you will create these things for receiver flat file only.
First create
In Integration Repository :
1. Import structure of IDOC in your scenario, In imported objects  IDOCs
a. In Interface Objects
1. Create Data type for your flat file
2. Create Message Type
3. Create Message Interface (inbound Asy.)
b. In Mapping Objects
1. Message Mapping : IDOC to Message Type of Flat File.
2. Create Interface Mapping : IDOC to Flat file by using Message Mapping which you have created.
Make activate all these things.
In Integration Directory :
1. Create Communication channel for File Receiver.
2. Sender Communication channel is not required.
3. Create Receiver Agreement.
4. Sender Agreement is not required.
5. Interface Determination
6. Receiver Determination
At sender side you will take your IDoc and at receiver side you will take your flat file.
It can help you,
Regards,
Sandeep Kaushik -
R/3 46C(IDOC) -- XI -- Flat file scenario
Hi
Is there anyone who could give me information on a R/3 46C(IDOC) --> XI --> Flat file scenario?
Many thanks!
br
GöranHi Manish
We are using a standard IDOC called PROACT.PROACT01
(We are using transaction sa38(Report RSMIPROACT) in R/3 to send our IDOC.)
First we create the technical and business systems in SLD
Second we transfer these to the repository.(I think the only thing you need to do is to update the SLD cache to get them there - Design : Integration builder --> Environment --> clear SLD cache)
Then we just use the configuration wizard(Configuration : Integration builder --> Tools --> configuration wizard) to map everything together - defining sender and receiver etc(You get the configuration wizard tool by patching XI to patch level 4 or 5).
I assume that you have made all the configurations accordingly to the XI configuration guide which you can download from the service marketplace.
This is just a hint but maybe it can give you a start.
br
Göran
Maybe you are looking for
-
WHY DOES ADOBE INDESIGN CC CRASH AT LAUNCH? WHY?
-Have OS X 10.9.1 -Just installed latest update for Indesign CC. -Try to open a file. It crashes. Something about 'font manager' -File opens fine on another computer without update. Your problem Adobe. FIX IT.
-
HELP - how to get photos from iphone after Telstra wiped it
Hi I am asking this question on behalf of my sister. She had her second child last week and her husband took heaps of photos on his iphone from the birth and the first couple days in hospital, I'm not sure what model his iphone is but he only got it
-
I want to know how can I make my playlist in my iPhone be from oldest to newest?
I want to know how can I make my playlist in my iPhone be from oldest to newest?
-
Why i can't send "MAIL FROM:"?
i wonder why i failed to send "MAIL FROM:" while commnunicating with the server using SMTP protocol? my code is: socket = new java.net.Socket(strServer, 25); dis = new java.io.DataInputStream(socket.getInputStream()); dos = new java.io.DataOutputStre
-
I have consistently purchased a multi pass for The Soup since 2010 without issue. I went to purchase another after the last expired & it says I have purchased one already. I have looked at my account & do not have any active multi passes. I purcha