IDOC order issue

Hi all,
Source system is sending IDOCS in specific order, but in receiving system we are receiving IDOCS which are not in sequence.Order of the IDOCS in the receiving system is different.
There is XI system in between source and target system
why this problem is occuring?
Kindly help, its very urgent.
Regards,
Rahul

Hi Rahul,
The fact that idocs are sent from the sender system one after another does not guarantee that they are received in the same order.
For example an error could happen inside XI and the second idoc could overtake the first one.
But if the sender system is a based on WAS > 6.40 then you can specifiy quality of service EOIO defining a queue name where all the idocs will pass through.
Also inside the received idoc adapter of xi you have to specify "mantain order" that will guarantee that the same order established by the sender is also mantained in the receiver.
In this blog <a href="/people/community.user/blog/2006/11/04/how-to-serialize-idoc-xml-messages-fed-into-xi">How to serialize IDoc XML messages fed into XI</a> the technique is explained in details.
Kind Regards,
Sergio

Similar Messages

Track order issues

I'm having this trouble with itunes and track orders:
Lately all cds that I've added to my collection got the wrong track order, the last song showing right after the first. I'm pretty sure all tracks share the same metadata for artist, album artist, album, etc.
So for this CD with 8 tracks the order itunes shows is 1-8-2-3-4-5-6-7. Same for two cds with 10 tracks (1-10-2-3..). I tried changing the artist/album info for the misplaced track but it always goes back to the wrong order when I fix it.
And oddly this only happens when I sort by album by artist. The order is correct when I sort by album only.
Any ideas?
Thanks

Buck Banzai wrote:
on the iPod: there's an album that appears 3 times on iPod with exactly the same songs while in itunes it's fine! what the **** is this? Can anyone help me?
Likely you just need to do a restore on the iPod, let it format and resync and it should be fine.
Buck Banzai wrote:
since i have a 8Gb iPod nano 3G and a 20Gb AND I would like to use the automatic Sync with the iPod i created a new library in iTunes where i'll have only 8Gb of stuff. Seems like a good idea to just plug the iPod and it syncs automatically with the stuff I've already chosen,
No that is a fairly inefficient way to do it. iTunes can tell your iPods apart, so all you have to do is sync them to the same library and for the Nano, set it up to sync a playlist of what you want.
Instead of creating a whole new library, just create a playlist in iTunes with that same set of music in it. Not only will you only have one library, but you can now easily add things or delete thing from that playlist out of your main library.
Then plug in the Nano and set it up to sync only that playlist. Simple!
Buck Banzai wrote:
Just another thing... can any of you advise me on a good auto-MP3 tagger application (for free!)?? I had a really good one for WinXP - Magic MP3 Tagger - but it's not available for Mac and i think it would resolve the track ordering issues!
iTunes is free and is a pretty good MP3 tagger.
Patrick

IDOC ORDERS

Hi Experts,
i need to distribute Purchase Order to another R3 system.
I'm using idoc ORDERS the problem is the inbound in the receivers system.
When the idoc came in receiver system i have msg error "VKORG, VTWEG, SPART cannot be determined for customer MXT0 , vendor 201000".... this seems link to Sales Order process and not really to Purchase Order....???!!!
I tried to use these 2 inbound process code DELO and ORDE but problem still again...
ANY IDEAS ?
thanks

For The incoming Purchase order creation use
the message type PORDCR
The Basic type is PORDCR01
The process code should be BAPI.
The Function that calls internally for this is BAPI_IDOC_INPUT1.
Try to make use all these and try for your requirement.
Please reward the points.

How use the contract reference in iDoc ORDERS

Hello experts,
I would like to use the iDoc ORDERS in order to create a sales order in my system, with reference to a contract.
It's working pretty well when I want to copy all the items of the contract and modify quantities. But I can't find out how to create an oder with only one item from the contract (which got more than one item).
I thought I could use the Action code in segment E1EDP01, but the code seems to have no consequence.
Then, what I want to do is :
1/ Create a contract with 3 items
2/ Create a sales order with reference to this contract but :
- delete two of the items, when they have been normally copied, because of customizing
- keep one item and modify quantity
Do you think this is possible plesae ?
Thank you in advance
Alex

Hello Alex,
Perhaps note 562710 (ORDERS: Creating orders with reference by EDI) could help you here. It explains which segments and qualifiers should be used.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Ian Kehoe

Plant missing in the inbound processing of IDOC ORDERS?

Hi gurus,
We are using IDOC ORDERS to create sales order in the inbound processing of R3 4.7 system, finally we found the sales order was created succesfully in VA03, but the plant(WERKS) and storage location(LGORT) couldn't be seen even the idoc has relevant value.
Have you met this case? Any help will be appreciated. Thanks.

Hi Himanshu,
Thans for your reply. I gave the field E1EDP01-WERKS the relevant value, but in VA03 we couldn't see the plant value when the idoc status was 53. When we debug it in WE19, we found the plant value probably wasn't assigned.
Any ideas?

Sending idoc ORDERS to logical system

Hi
Can I send a idoc orders from a logical system to another? I have two seperate servers and want to be able to trace a order created in the other system.
The scenario is: A purcaser creates a ordere in client 200 and sends a idoc to client 250, the users in client 250 will be able to se the order even if the communication link between the systems is down.
Any ideas?
Best Regards,
Morten
Message was edited by: Morten Gummedal

Hi,
Have a look at this, it may help
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/2d/b12d3b1daca008e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4c/df7e98f0dd11d2b74b0000e8160175/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/dc/6b7cac43d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/frameset.htm
If you just want to send delivery information use output type LAVA. This will need including in the shipping output determination.

Need to generate 2 idoc"mapping issue"

Hi Experts,
When the Purchase_order_type is coming like HIGH,REGULAR,NEW,BOUNCED. In this case i need to generate 2 idoc, based on HIGH is one and Other than HIGH is one, even though if it's REGULAR,NEW,BOUNCED.
I can't generate. pl suggest
rgds
selvam

Hi,
Please make sure you will sort the data in your select query.
Now, you need to have two idocs in mapping. Click on Duplicate Subtree to have second IDOC. Now lets assume, your first IDOC represents mapping when ORDER TYPE is HIGH and your second IDOC represents mapping when your ORDER TYPE is not equal to HIGH that is NEW, BOUNCED, REGULAR etc.
I have defined Source and Target data type as follows.
Source Data Type:
SDN
   <Row>
      <CQ_NO/>
      <ORDER_TYPE/>
      <LINE_NO/>
   </Row>
Target Data Type:
SDNTarget
   <IDOC>
      <Node>
         <CQ_NO/>
         <ORDER_TYPE/>
         <ItemNode>
            <LINENO/>
         </ItemNode>
      </Node>
   </IDOC>
Mapping for IDOC 1:
IDOC:
Order Type -->Fix Values --> remove context
Fix Values (This should have default u201Cfalseu201D and HIGH = true)
Concatenate Output of point 1 with CQ_NO (Context of CQ_NO should be at SDN)
Output of point 3 --> Split by value (value changed) -->collapse context
Output of point 4 will be first input to u201CStart withu201D function and second input will be constant u201Ctrueu201D
Output of Point 5 --> create if --> IDOC
Node:
Map with constant
CQ_NO:
Order Type --> Fix Values --> remove context
Fix Values (This should have default u201Cfalseu201D and HIGH = true)
Concatenate Output of point 1 with CQ_NO (Context of CQ_NO should be at SDN)
Output of point 3 --> Split by value (value changed)
User Format By example. Pass CQ_NO (Context of CQ_NO should be at Row) as first input and second input should be output of point 4.
Pass Output of format by example that is point no 5, to collapse context --> Split by value (Each Value) --> CQ_NO
ORDER_TYPE
Order Type --> Fix Values --> remove context
Fix Values (This should have default u201Cfalseu201D and HIGH = true)
Concatenate Output of point 1 with CQ_NO (Context of CQ_NO should be at SDN)
Output of point 3 --> Split by value (value changed)
User Format By example. Pass ORDER_TYPE (Context of CQ_NO should be at Row) as first input and second input should be output of point 4.
Item Node:
Order Type --> Fix Values --> remove context
Fix Values (This should have default u201Cfalseu201D and HIGH = true)
Concatenate Output of point 1 with CQ_NO (Context of CQ_NO should be at SDN)
Output of point 3 --> Split by value (value changed)
Output of point 4 will be first input to u201CStart withu201D function and second input will be constant u201Ctrueu201D
Output of Point 5 --> create if --> IDOC

Mapping file to idoc ORDERS

Hello,
How can I map the file under with the idoc ORDERS
file :
N° Sales order, date , posnr, material, qty
ex:
0001,20050101,10,mat1,10
0001,20050101,20,mat2,10
0001,20050101,30,mat3,10
0002,20050102,10,mat4,20
0002,20050102,10,mat5,30
all the lines contain the N° sales and date
I must map the header (N° sales and date ) only 1 time in the idoc header corresponding.
Thanks.
Message was edited by: JCA

the give below is more clear form
idoc
a1---(0-1)
a2---(0-1)
b1--
a3---(0-1)
b1---(0-n)
c1---
b2---
c1---
a3---(0-n)
b1---
b2---
a3---
b1---
b2---
a3
b1---
b2---
Thanks
ram

IDOC ORDERS Filter

Hi,
I have a problem with the filter of the idoc ORDERS because I have a filter
on the segment E1EDP01 field LGORT.
Question : If I want that every time the filter on the LGORT is not respected, the IDOC ORDERS is not generated, how do I make this.
Because now, if the filter on the LGORT is not repected, the segment E1EDP01 is not generetad but the IDOC ORDERS yes and this is a problem.
Thank you for your feedback.
Denis

Try to use the Filter Objects... or EXITS...
TCodes: BD95, BD59, BD60

Serial numbers to generation at Sales Order Issue

Hi someone knows about Serial Control
Do use serial number at pick release is mandatory apply Installed Base?
what´s different between serial numbers generation in reception and at Sales Orders Issue?
thanks,

Do use serial number at pick release is mandatory apply Installed Base?
No it is not mandarory if you use this serial control (At Sales Order Issue). If you use serial number control at receipt then serial number is mandatory at the time of pick confirming.
what´s different between serial numbers generation in reception and at Sales Orders Issue?
At Receipt:
You maintain serial numbers in inventory and transaction them in inventory for all transactions.
At SO Issue:
You enter the serial numbers only at the time of shipments.
As IB knows the inventory controls it maintains the information accordignly. When in inventory serial numbers can be grouped into one instance as they do not have any serial number. Once shipped, the same instance will be split and is created as a different instance with the serial number.
Thanks
Nagamohan

HI can anybody   facing IDOC'S ISSUE

HI can anybody   facing IDOC'S ISSUE
SEND IT TO ME
I WILL SOLVE   FOR YOU
THANKS AND REGARDS
RAJU

hi there,
I am trying to load finsta into SAP from the middle ware GXS and all the ports in them looks good when I go to we02 to view the status, it gives error 51. the message says "Error during insert in table FEBKO". There are no more details of this error.
i Tried comparing FEBKO-AZIDT and FEBKO-WVTIM to make sure both are respectively unique
I have deleted this entries from FEBKO by running RFEBKA96 and then we tried to resend/reprocess the IDOC
but still persisting with the same error message 51,
the status on the idoc shud be 0 inorder to process that right.
even when we changed the time why is it giving us the error message 51.
can you put some light on to it please...
points will be assigned.
thanks
Jay

Idoc ORDERS PRICE CONDITIONS

Hi Experts,
I'm facing a problem.
I have to load some Idoc of type ORDERS05 into the system, but I'm not able to pass to the order the pricing conditions.
They are manual conditions and percentage. I'm using segment E1EDP05.
Please let me know how to fill this segment to achieve the correct result.
Thanks in advance,
Paolo F.C.

Usually the processing of the conditions in the ORDERS-IDoc is ignored or fails completely. The reason is, that many companies do not want to accept random conditions sent by their customers. Just imagine you give your stuff away for free.
So usually the SAP system calculates the conditions for your customers and materials automatically. So maintain the conditions in your master data is the best practice.
Anyway you can alter this.
Pricing conditions need to be configured to allow manual update via an incoming ORDERS05.
See also:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/12/084c0a470311d1894a0000e8323352/frameset.htm
Make sure you enable the condition type for manual entries and disable the pricing sequences or better: set the condition type to be the last condition type so the SAP system does not override your condition type. To avoid side effects it is necessary to use this condition type just for the IDoc ORDERS in an exclusive way.
In case this has already been done or the condition processing in your IDoc is already enabled make sure you fill the following fields in the E1EDP05 Segment:
ALCKZ
KSCHL
BETRG or KRATE
See transaction WE60 for IDoc documentation and detailed values for those fields.

Stacked bar chart order issue

I am definitely missing something here.
I have a stacked flash bar chart which displays 3 types of counts per year_month. I cannot get the bars in the correct order.
It's mostly correct except for 2 bonkers cases where it puts 2005_12 and 2006_01 to the right of
2011_01 . I cannot figure out what causes this. There is a peculiarity involving those 2 year_months in that every other
year_month had > 0 number of the first type of count except these 2 which solely had the second type of count.
But how this translates into an order issue I have no idea. The query orders the data by year_month.
Any ideas?
the last part of the query is:
select null LINK, (a.YEAR_MONTH) "LABEL", b.OVERNIGHTS,c.DAYTIMES,d.NAPS from
year_months a, myovernights b, mydaytimes c, mynaps d
where a.yearmonth < to_char(sysdate,'YYYYMM') and
a.year_month = b.year_month(+) and
a.year_month = c.year_month(+) and
a.year_month = d.year_month(+) order by a.YEAR_MONTH
year_months is a view with 2 fields:
year_month varchar2(7) (yyyy_mm)
yearmonth number(6) (yyyymm)
and contains all the year_months from our time 0 up to 2020.

yeah! I figured it out, based on reading this thread:
Anychart, show empty diagram ?
So stacking chart-ers, make sure to remember to use nvl in your query to return 0 instead of null!
select null LINK, (a.YEAR_MONTH) "LABEL", nvl(b.OVERNIGHTS,0),nvl(c.DAYTIMES,0),nvl(d.NAPS,0) from
year_months a, myovernights b, mydaytimes c, mynaps d
where a.yearmonth < to_char(sysdate,'YYYYMM') and a.year_month = b.year_month(+) and
a.year_month = c.year_month(+) and
a.year_month = d.year_month(+) order by a.YEARMONTH
duh, I knew it would be something elementary! Having said that though I don't think it should be the case that
the order departs from the order in the query. It would be better to change this behavior or at least warn people
that it happens.

How to Create a Return Order wrt a Standard Order using Inbound IDOC Orders

HI,
We have a scenario :
Standard Order - is exiting in System with 2 line items :
Item 10
Qty 20
Item 20
Qty 30
Is it possible create a Return Order With Reference to this standard order for Line Item 20 only using inbound IDOC Orders?
If yes what should be the mapping in the IDOC about the Standard Order, Item and QTY ?
Regards
Anurag

hi,
try using this bapi.
/AFS/BAPI_SALESORD_CREATEFDATA.
thanks,
satish

Apple Watch Pre-Order Issues?

Any one have any pre-order issues?

Oh well,
Apple knew by suggesting to favorite watches on folks online accounts that would give Apple a perspective of what to make more of and prepare for.
Now Apple is making thousands of watches a day and thanks to pre-orders they have an even better idea of what watches to make more of, faster and where to send them. Or out of the watches already made they know where to send them and what type to send.
This is a very personal item that required a special touch in manufacturing and then the matching up types and colors of bands to colors and types of metal that is not easy. The thought of the parameters of logistics all on it's own is a nightmare too. So if my delivery date says 4-6 weeks I consider myself to be lucky.
Just think some one at a manufacturing plant may be boxing your watch right now and placing it on a stack that is to be shipped to your point on a map.

IDOC order issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for