Ignore already planned network cost in RA

Dear All,
My client uses network cost planning and option determine planned cost after release. Now client decided to use Result Analysis (RA) and want to use Unit Cost Planning (UCP).
Now, problem is RA (KKA2) considered already planned network cost for running project. So that we cannot use UCP in loading full cost of any running project.
Please, suggest any way to avoide network planned cost in RA.
Regards,
Nilesh.

Dear Virendra and All,
Thanks, Virendra for your useful answer.
I want to share another two options to check its possible effects, they are as as follows:
1) Remove costing variant from network and activate option do not dtermine plan cost.
2) Use any suitable RA userexist for selecting plan cost in RA (From suitable source).
Request, your opinions on above two options and any other effective option from your side.
Regards,
Nilesh.

Similar Messages

Easy cost Planning & Network Costing

Dear All
In one Project can we use both Easy cost Planning & Network Costing. Easy cost planning is generally used when you have structure with WBS only. Network cost planning is a combination of group of activities, all these having their relevant cost elements/ work center combination. can we manage both this in one project. If it possible please explain in detail.
Regards
Nivrutti

What is your business requirement ? It depends on that. Yes your understanding is quite correct. We use easy cost planning in the initial phase of project. Easy cost planning can be done in various versions including 0 plan / actaul version. If you does easy cost planning in 0 along with network costin you will double up lannning cost.
Network costing can only be done in plan / actual version 0 only.
Best approach is to use easy cost plnnaing as rough cut level apart from 0 version. And use network costing. However it may very a/c to business requirement.
With Regards
Nitin P.

Issue with reversal of MIRO for Planned Delivery Cost

Hi Xperts
We have found out an issue while reversing the MIRO document for Planned Del costs. When we have done the MIRO, the accounting entry got correctly posted with correct account keys.Conditions are not inventoried.
However, when we had reversed it - the stock account got hit.Do not understand, why that happened.Do you have any clue?
1. Suppose we have done the MIRO for Del Cost & then performed GR.Now Stock has already consumed & afterwards we have found that the MIRO for Del Cost is wrong & reverse - in this scenario shall the Stock account will get a hit????
2. I have maintained Price Control "V" in Material Master.However, I have maintained a Standard Price by mistake.In that case shall SAP ignores the MAP & takes Standard Price into account & post PRD??
Regards
Soumick

Hi,
Before checking Planned Delivery costs accounting documents in MIRO posting and MIRO cancellation document, 1st check how Planned Delivery costs designed for your procurement process.
Use t.code:ME23N, check your Purchase order
Option-1:
Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account and at the same time Planned Delivery costs posted to Separate Planned Delivery costs G/L account.
OR
Option-2:
Is Planned Delivery costs posted to Planned Delivery costs G/L account ONLY
OR
Option-3:
Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account ONLY.
Based the above one setting, system will post goods receipt and invoice posting document with corresponding accounting entries. Also cancellation of invoice posting document refer to these setting.But account posting depends on price control available in material master.
NOTE:
Standard price procedure (price control “S”):The system carries out all stock postings at a price defined in the material master. Variances in price are posted to price difference accounts.
Moving average price (price control “V”): The system valuates goods receipts with the purchase order price and goods issues with the current moving average price.Differences in price between the purchase order price and the invoice are posted directly to the relevant stock account if there is sufficient stock coverage.
Regards,
Biju K

Copy planning for cost center Runtime error

Dear Gurus,
I am running KP97 to copy planning for cost center.
but I got following runtime error:
===================================================================
Runtime Errors         DYN_CALL_METH_CLASS_NOT_FOUND
Exception              CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_CLASS
       Occurred on     07.01.2009 at 13:21:25
What happened?
Error in ABAP application program.
The current ABAP program "SAPLGUMD " had to be terminated because one of the
statements could not be executed.
This is probably due to an error in the ABAP program.
What can you do?
Print out the error message (using the "Print" function)
and make a note of the actions and input that caused the
error.
To resolve the problem, contact your SAP system administrator.
You can use transaction ST22 (ABAP Dump Analysis) to view and administer
termination messages, especially those beyond their normal deletion
date.
Error analysis
An exception occurred. This exception is dealt with in more detail below
. The exception, which is assigned to the class 'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_CLASS',
was neither
caught nor passed along using a RAISING clause, in the procedure
"USER_REFRESH_RE_EA" "(FORM)"
Since the caller of the procedure could not have expected this exception
to occur, the running program was terminated.
The reason for the exception is:
Class "CL_REEX_COPL_MASTERDATA_CHECK" was chosen during dynamic method call,
but could not be found.
=====================================================================
can anybody give me a hint how to solve the problem?
B.R.
George
Hi all, I searched the SAP notes, and found there is one note NOTE_0000632335 related to copy planning, I installed the note by TCode snote. the KP97 can run now, but for the IDES controling area 1000, I tried to test run copy version 0, period 1 to 12 from Fiscal year 2003 to 2004.
there are many records with error.
shall I ignore the error , unselect the test run and continue?
does anyone have similar experience with IDES R/3 4.71? why cannot I carry out all steps in online document for IDES?
B.R.
George
Edited by: George Pan on Jan 7, 2009 11:39 PM

Hi I checked the error with copying plan data. it's all because of 'plan data already exists'.
so I just ignore the error and continue.
thanks!
George

Report to display Mat Cost Planned Labour Cost and Over head cost

Hi Abapers,
Greetings of the day..
I need a Report that Display Material Cost , Planned Labour Cost,Actual Labour Cost and Over head value
where do i start from and what are the tables involving in this report..
if already done this A code snippet is more helpful...
Thanks In Advance...
Thanks & Regards
Sathish

Assuming you are talking about Maintenance Order.
Use table: PMCO.
Here the line with field VORGA having value KPPS gives the Planned Costs of the Order in the field WRT01.
Similarly, the line with field VORGA having value RKL gives the Actual Costs of the Order in the field WRT01.
Also have a look at Tcode KKBC_ORD.
Jogeswara Rao K

WARNING: Failed to get Network Cost info from NLM, assuming network is NOT metered, error = 0x80240037

I have couple of VMs Server 2012 R2 RTM on Hyper-v Host running the same OS.
All machines including host and VM that is not in domain have an error in Windowsupdate.log:
AU WARNING: Failed to get Network Cost info from NLM, assuming network is NOT metered, error = 0x80240037
FW and UAC are off on all. There are posts on web discussing the same error but most of them connect this to WSUS or Config Manager. And it is clear because we are touching Windowsupdate.log when troubleshooting WSUS. And because WSUS on 2012 is BUGGY this
error confuses too.
Finally, as mentioned earlier I deployed NEW server 2012 not from SYSPREP and did not place it to the domain. Updated the machine from MS update. Everything is OK beside the same error about COST :).
So now it is clear it has nothing to do with WSUS or Configuration manager. It indicates to some Network issue. But there is no clear answer. Some suggest just to ignore the error if everything is OK. But I would like to have a clean log. And it is just
interesting what could cause the problem. Is it Hyper-V stuff or Server 2012 itself. Anyway I guess I am doing right by posting a question on HV forum since here are people that should know 2012 .
Thanks.
see the log below
2013-12-16 20:32:03:610 752 b44 Setup SelfUpdate check completed. SelfUpdate is NOT required.
2013-12-16 20:32:04:047 752 b44 PT +++++++++++ PT: Synchronizing server updates +++++++++++
2013-12-16 20:32:04:047 752 b44 PT   + ServiceId = {9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77}, Server URL =
https://fe2.update.microsoft.com/v6/ClientWebService/client.asmx
2013-12-16 20:32:04:047 752 b44 Agent Reading cached app categories using lifetime 604800 seconds
2013-12-16 20:32:04:047 752 b44 Agent Read 1 cached app categories
2013-12-16 20:32:05:016 752 b44 PT   + SyncUpdates round trips: 2
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 b44 Agent   * Found 0 updates and 14 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 449 out of 701 deployed entities
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 b44 Agent *********
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 b44 Agent ** END ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates Id = 2]
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 b44 Agent *************
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 b44 IdleTmr WU operation (CSearchCall::Init ID 2, operation # 20) stopped; does use network; is not at background priority
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 b44 IdleTmr Decremented PDC RefCount for Network to 0
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 b44 IdleTmr Decremented idle timer priority operation counter to 1
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 ba0 AU >>## RESUMED ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {5393115A-5840-4CB4-9C66-F68034E75DF8} ServiceId = {9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77}]
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 ba0 AU   # 0 updates detected
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 ba0 AU #########
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 ba0 AU ## END ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {5393115A-5840-4CB4-9C66-F68034E75DF8} ServiceId = {9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77}]
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 ba0 AU #############
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 ba0 AU All AU searches complete.
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 ba0 AU AU setting next detection timeout to 2013-12-17 22:55:28
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 ba0 AU WARNING: Failed to get Network Cost info from NLM, assuming network is NOT metered, error = 0x80240037
2013-12-16 20:32:06:422 752 ba0 AU WARNING: Failed to get Network Cost info from NLM, assuming network is NOT metered, error = 0x80240037
"When you hit a wrong note it's the next note that makes it good or bad". Miles Davis

Hi pob579,
Sorry for the late .
I want to know if your network connection indicates " unidentified network ".
If that is the case , you can try the step below :
    open the "local group policy"
    expand local computer policy -->computer configuration -->windows settings -->security settings
--> network list manager policies
    in the right pane you will see Unidentified Networks , double click it , then you can configure the
Location Type when the network connection is unidentified
    If there is domain , you need to change the same entry in "Domain Policy"
    after that please restart your computer
Hope this helps
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Exchange Rate for planned delivery cost

Hi
In one PO ( Document type NB with item category std) exchange rate for planned delivery charges ( Condition type FRC1) is calculated considering base date as document date of PO.( Exchange Rate is not fixed) while doing Goods Receipt
In other PO ( Document type NB with item category L -subcontracting ) exchange rate for planned delivery charges ( Condition type FRB1) is calculated considering base date as posting date of GR.( Exchange Rate is not fixed)
Can anyone tell why ?

Dear Murugan
I wish to putforth the below check for you to solve the issue.
You told that Intially while creating the PO, your supply vendor and freight vendors are different, please check did you enter the vendor code in the freight item condition details. If yes then you have two invoicing parties for the PO.
Now you also told that, you have carried out MIGO for the PO line item which which has Freight also as an additional condition type. That means for the PO line item your GR have been completed or partly done. If you have done this then how did you change the freight vendor in PO after GR for the item , system does not allow that as you have already carried out the the GRN.
To avoid all such cases of freight vendor change, the best solution is to change the vendor before GRN itself and assign the right vendor in the item condition of the PO,then proceed forthe GRN.
For your case please cancell the GRN also since you have already cancelled the Invoice.
Assign the right Freignt vendor , then proceed for MIGO. Once done In MIRO go for invoice and select goods/service items from the selection menu and process it for the supply vendor.
Then again you can go for MIRO and select planned delivery cost from the drop down and process it.
The above can be done combined also and in any sequence also , there are no holds upon that.
Regds
Sam

Activate Integrated Planning for Cost Line Items posting

Hi all,
Based on this SAP Help link, there are two ways to create plan line items:
1) By adding the business transaction "Plan line items" to the user status of the WBS Element.
2) By activating Planning Integration a.k.a. Integrated Planning for version and WBS Element/Project Profile.
Option 1 works fine for me.
However, option 2 does not seem to be working when I activate it, contradicting the state from the link:
If planning integration is active in the fiscal-year-dependent parameters of the relevant planning versions, the system writes cost element planning line items for plan-integrated WBS elements, regardless of user status.
So far what I have customized is:
-In transaction OKEV, select the version, click on "Settings for Each Fiscal Year" and double click for the year. Then I mark both "Integrated Planning" and "Integrated planning with cost center/bus. processes" checkboxes.
-Activate "Integrated Planning" at Project Profile level: go to transaction OPSA, select Project Profile, go to tab "Controlling" and mark "Integrated Planning".
Nevertheless, when I post plan costs from transaction CJR2 using the customizing above (based on second option), I see no cost lines when running CJI4.
I wonder if there is something missing in customizing that allows me to see posted cost line items in CJI4. I would appreciate very much your help.
Many thanks and best regards,
Pablo

Hi Gokul,
Many thanks for the link to that threat, Rachel Tang's reply on that discussion is very complete and included the answer to my question.
She comments that three points must be checked to activate Integration Planning:
1) Mark "Integrated Planning" at CO Version/Year level (SPRO > Controlling > General Controlling > Organization > Maintain versions).
2) Mark "Integrated Planning with costs centers/bus. processes" at CO Version/Year level (same transaction).
3) Ensure WBS Element has Integration Planning marked (PRPS-PLINT = X). [It looks like this is done automatically by marking Project Integration at Project Profile level BEFORE project is created]
In my case, I had first and second steps correct. However, even though I had marked Integration Planning at Project Profile level, it seems that already created Project Definitions are not updated with new Integrated Planning value after it is changed at Project Profile level.
Maybe it is possible to modify WBS Element's Integration Planning flag manually (though SAP OSS Note 301917 states that this is impossible), otherwise I could never achieve Integration Planning for already created projects.
In my case it would be more suitable to use the alternative of adding Business Transaction "Write plan line items" to User Status.
Many thanks to Sanjeev and Gokul for your help.
Best regards,
Pablo

MIRO-Planned delivery Cost

Hi,
We have made a PO where there is a problem with one of the wrong condition type(Transit Insurance) which does not have any secondary vendor assingement,but the condition type is having Account key (Other Clearing)
As the MIRO-Planned delivery Cost Conditions for Sec Vendors Such as
Basci Customs, Excise, octroi, are allready posted& the GR for this material is allredy done & the material is allready issued
the value which is lying in the other Clearing account needs to be settled as there is no vendor assingemnt to this condition type we are finding it difficult where to nullify this account
Please suggest what can be done

Hi
Now that you have already posted the Transit insurance amount , I suppose you are getting the amount against the material supply vendor. One way for you to settle the expenses is to use the JV - FB60 for this to remove the amoutn and reassign the other vendor in FI
Regards

Planned delivery cost payed before GR

Hi all experts,
We are analyzing to use transportation for planned delivery costs and freight.
We will have multiple legs (steps) in a route and let's say that the end to end transport will take approximately 30 days to complete but we would like to pay for some of the legs (transport) that have already occurred.
So the question is: is it possible to post planned cost for the entire route and pay for them in parts before the GR? Is there any restriction that we should take into consideration?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
you can not change or introduce delivery cost after gr, partial gr. However you can add new condition for insurance after gr.
regards
Ishu

Network costing stored in CO version 1 or 2

Hi All,
Can we use the CO version 1 or 2 for network cost planning otherthan 0 and how?
I want to store the network cost planning in CO Version 1 or 2 and not in version 0.
Regards
Muzmail

Hi Amit.Amerash,
Actually the problem with my client is that they are planning materials/services to the project from time to time.There is no single time material planning so it will create problem while running RA because system will post wrong COS to the project.
So i was thinking that if possible to store network costing in version 1 and i can do manual cost planning in 0 for system to post exact COS .otherwise i have to tick off the addititive indicator for order cat 20 in OPSV.
I want to see both network cost planning and manual cost planning in the system.
Regards
Muzamil

Network costing in Project system

Hi,
I have created network costing variant. i want to create cost planning in cj40 it is not update in Order/ network column but it is update in planning column.
regards
purna

Hi,
Costing varaints are different topics for planning and actuals values. please read sap help documents.
More over, you are not doing any cost planning in CJ40 for network or it is being used for WBS element level.
In reports, order column, you will see the cost rolled from network activity. CJ40 cost planning will display planning column. every things working well here as you are doing.
Please try to post your query in such a way that it should be readable and understandable to others.
Did you make out any thing from your query after posting?. Sorry about that.
Thanks,
Sudhakar

Planning network activities

Hi all,
I have a question related to project planning.
I would like to plan the network activities per cost element and per period (year/month) as this is a customer requirement . However, in the end i would have a lot of cost elements per wbs elements which i think it would not be user friendly. How could i manage this in a easier way? Moreover, some of these activities have several delivery dates which i think it complicates the project planning (even in several years)
Moreover, as far as i know, it is not possible to copy the activities real values to a plan version. How can i manage this using the sap standard functions?
Any ideas?
Many thanks.

Hi,
Different WBS can have different Responsible Cost centres and Required cost centre. However we can define the network cost centre depending upon the type of activity we are doing. The settlement of the root WBS will clubbed all the cost from different activity -- > Different Network --> Different Levels WBS to the root WBS.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Uddhab

How to reverse network cost

Hi All,
Can someone tell me how to how to reverse network cost
done thru cj9k
to bring back the project to its originall status
Thanks,
Regards,
Mercy

Hi Mercy,
The CJ9K do the plan costs calculation, the FI posting and purchase cause the actual costs and commitment. They have nothing to do with each othter.
To reserve the plan costs is somehow strange requirement. To remove the costing reporting information, the CJEN (with delete flag set) may the right one. But there is no transaction to reserve the plan costs. You can initialize the costs relevant information, e.g. planned work = 0, then re-calculate the network.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo

Network costing

Dear Experts................
Can any one plz explain the scenario of Network costing.
Process and steps.
Regards
Chandra

Hi Chandra,
You can plan project costs in two different ways:
1.Manual cost planning in the WBS
2.Cost planning using activities (network costing)
When you plan dates and resources in network activities, the system determines the corresponding planned costs automatically.
Planned costs are determined for the following objects:
   1.Activity inputs for internally-processed activities
   2.Primary costs for externally-processed activities and services
   3.Primary costs for general costs activities
   4.Primary costs for material components
Please refer link as mentioned below for more details
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/df/561213c3c411d1ad990000e8a6353a/frameset.htm
Regards
Tushar

Ignore already planned network cost in RA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for