Implementing BP for Sales in ECC 5.0

Hi,
I have ECC 5.0 runing. Can anybody confirm me if the Business Package for Sales 60.1 works on this system. If yes, Can you please help me with the detailed steps for installing, configuring and running this Business package on EP 6.0?
Regards,
Guru Subramanian B

Hi,
According to the documentation, this BP is for ECC 5.0. Check out this link.
http://kwhelp.sap.com/SAPIKS/S4b34392546ef4593955b4f0a80305d37/KW/IWB_STRUCTBB036B4060A1181CE10000000A1550B0/IWB_EXTHLPB7036B4060A1181CE10000000A1550B0/?LANGUAGE=EN&RELEASE=640&IWB_INDUSTRY=&IWB_COUNTRY=&TMP_IWB_TASK=DISPLAY
As far as technical information and how to configure check out this link
http://kwhelp.sap.com/SAPIKS/S4b34392546ef4593955b4f0a80305d37/KW/IWB_STRUCTBB036B4060A1181CE10000000A1550B0/IWB_EXTHLPB7036B4060A1181CE10000000A1550B0/?LANGUAGE=EN&RELEASE=640&IWB_INDUSTRY=&IWB_COUNTRY=&TMP_IWB_TASK=DISPLAY
Good luck
John

Similar Messages

Looking for Implementation Guide for Sales and Distribution

From where can I download "Implementation Guide" for Sales and Distribution or can anybody mail me the guide?
Thanks in advance for the answers.

HI
REFER BELOW LINK DOWNLOAD
<a href="http://sapbrainsonline.com/TUTORIALS/FUNCTIONAL/SD_tutorial.html">SD (Sales and Distribution) Tutorials</a>
<a href="http://www.esnips.com/_t_/SAP+SD">SAP SD</a>

How to implement Approval hierarchy for Sales Order in Order Management.

Hi,
We need approval process for sale orders in Order Management module. Currently we are using credit HOLD option for orders at shipping level. The issue we are facing now is we can not cancel those orders who contains Service Line item in it while on HOLD. The restriction raised at the time of cancelling the order that the Line Item is "fulfilled". Service line item's get fulfilled.
Is that any other possibility to have Approval hierarchy for Sales Orders in Order Management Module? If it is possible can anybody share the related document or implementation guide?
Thanks with anticipation in advance.
Many Regards
Kaleem Bhatti

I copied the standard order header workflow and the "Book Order, Manual" workflow to custom workflows. I then modified the "Book Order, Manual" workflow to put another completely custom workflow (call this "Approvals") in between the "Book Eligible" and "Book" steps.
The "Approvals" step assessed the sales order, changed the order header to the pending approval flow_status_code, and sent out the appropriate notifications. The "Approvals" step returned a Complete/Incomplete where complete would proceed to "Book" and incomplete would go back to "Book Eligible." The new workflow was then assigned to the order type needed. I don't still have access to that environment (job change) or I would give more definite instructions.

ATP check for delivery in ECC & Sales order ATP check in APO

Hi All,
Can we do an ATP check for delivery in ECC , but for the same set of Materials- Plant combination , the ATP check when a SO is created should happen in APO .
We do not want to remove the Business event 'B' which is meant for delivery in APO . For some materials we need APO ATP check to happen for delivery & for some it should be in ECC & for SO the ATP check should happen in APO .
Even if we do not have check instructions pertaining to Business event 'B' & a particular check mode (for the materials where the ATP check for delivery should happen in ECC & SO check to happen in APO) , when we are doing an ATP check for delivery , it is still pointing to APO ATP check rather than ECC check .
Any pointers for this is highly appreciated.
Regards
Surendra

Hi Surendra,
For SO, business event is A and for delivery it's B. When integrated with ECC, the check rule in ECC points as biz event in APO.
You can control ATP check by customized settings for check rule in ECC.
Also, by setting requirement class and requirement type in ECC, you control check mode in APO. So, even if you dont define for check mode in APO, the system might refer from ECC for the ATP check settings. Look into your ECC customization for how requirement class is derived and settings for requirement type. (based on MRP type, strategy grp and Item cat).
I'm not sure how you can control ATP to happen for some sales orders/deleveries in ECC and for some in APO, since check mode is mentioned in material master.
However, there are ATP BADIs (business add-ins) available in both ECC and APO, whch can serve your purpose.
Regards,
Bipin

/SAPAPO/CIF_IRQ_REDUCT_INBOUND queue is found in ecc for sales order ?

Hi all,
i can find this queue "/SAPAPO/CIF_IRQ_REDUCT_INBOUND on outbound queue which is strange and which has caused to stop the standard mcex_update_11_qrfc queue to be stopped!!
Can anyone pls explain me when this queue is been used in the apo and for what purposes and how it gets triggered!!
Thanks

Hi,
but the queue is found in the ecc and it caused to stopped executing the daily extraction queue for sales order?
thanks

CRM Sales Orders vs. Exits Sales Order ECC

Hi Experts,
In my project, there are somes user exits implemented for sales order in SAP ECC. However, when CRM send to ECC the sales orders, they dont access the user exits, but if the order is processed again - using VA02 - in ECC, the user exits are accessed.
Is it possible CRM send the sales order to ECC and the sales orders access the user exits without any manual intervention?
Best Regards and Tks again,
Nivea

Hi,
The sales order user exits will be processed for the sales orderes created from CRM and flow to ECC.
Except if you have coded like IF SY-SCODE = 'VA01'.In this case you code will not be processed since this is wrong of writing the code.

RBA GATP check is not getting invoked for Sales Order

Hi Everyone,
RBA GATP check is not getting invoked for Sales order.
I maintained the configuration settings for 'Rules-Based Availability Check', APO general settings (check mode, check instruction), carried out integrated rule maintenance, Rule determination for the combination of order type & product, associated the check mode to product master. Also maintained all the settings in ECC towards Req class, Req type, checking control etc.
However, sales order is not invoking RBA Check though it is showing up the 'Rule' icon in the screen. Also, in the APO Availability check in Sales order when I click onto 'check instruction', I get the checking mode that pertains to RBA for business event 'A' (Sales order). Though I have not maintained any stock for the main material for which I have the sales order, yet system is confirming any quantity that I put in.
I would expect that system would propose the same material in an alternate location where we have stock through RBA.
Request you to share ideas on this.
Regards,
Avijit Dutta

Hi Avijit,
You should used No Checking Horizon in Checking instructions and also Check your rule control settings.
What you have defined in 1st and 2nd steps. Check whether product substitution is carried out or Location Substitution.
Thanks,
Bala.

Requisitions for sale order stock

Requisitions for sale order stock that are generated directly from the
sales order are not passed to SRM but requisitions that are created
manually for sales order stock are passed to SRM.
Why is the sourcing of a requisition for sales order stock where the
requisition was created directly from the sales order not supported?

Hi,
We need same requirement, we found only PR's with item category "5"(Third party ) created from sales are transfered to SRM.( It is hard coaded in ECC).
Let us know if you are able to resolve your issue.
Thank you
Sreedhar Vetcha

DRQ: Different default warehouse for Sales,Purchase and Production Process

Hi Experts,
In my recent Implementation Project I realised that there should be provision of capturing and using different default warehouse for Sales,Purchase and Production.
For example in manufacturing company
1. Default ware house for Purchase process should be QC ware house for raw material.
2. Default ware house for Production process should be RM ware house for raw material (components).
3. Default ware house for Production process should be QC ware house for Finished Good (Parent Item).
4. Default ware house for Sales process should be FG ware house for Finished Good (Parent Item).
I hope the idea is clear, I am looking for 3 different set as default warehouse for each item in Item master Inventory tab.
Internally when a user create a document than default warehouse is to be picked up from this setting !
Best Regards,
Samir Gandhi

Hi !
I guess the indicator "Exclusive" in the accessess of the access sequence can meet the requirement if I have note misunderstood the issue.
Press : F1 help on Exclusive Indicator -
Indicator: Exclusive condition access
Controls whether the system stops searching for a record after the first successful access for a condition type within an access sequence.
Thanks & Regards

Down Payment processing for Sales orders using Milestone Billing Plan

Hi,
The business scenario is as follows.
The delivery for the sales orders are to be created only after the pre payment( a percentage of the total sales order value) is made by the customer.
Hence the sales orders while creation are blocked for delivery creation using credit block by means of a userexit.
The credit manager checks the blocked sales orders using VKM1 transaction and verify if there are any payments made by the customer to cover this pre payment to be made.
If it is enough to cover then he releases the sales order manually for delivery creation.This is a complex process since there are too many sales orders and the payments made by the customer may not match the amount to be paid(it can be greater or lesser).The customer just pays a huge amount which is to be distributed among the sales orders for pre payments.
Later, when the invoice is created, the customer account is cleared manually using F-32 transaction for the oldest open invoices.
Here again there is a huge manual effort involved since he need to distribute the amount against the invoices using oldest open item principle.
As a solution we are planning to implement "Down Payment processing for Sales orders using Milestone Billing Plan".
Is this the right solution?
Can you please give the steps in detail to implement this functionality for above scenario?
We are using SAP 4.7 version without Project Systems.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ragesh

Hi Ragesh
Check the links where you will get the entire down-payment configuration
[https://forums.sdn.sap.com/post!replydownpayments ]
Regards
Srinath

How to configure rescheduling for sale order quantities

kindly explain how to configure rescheduling for sale order quantities that are created last month. kindly explain. i am in urgent.
regards,
g.v.shivakkumar

Hi,
Short text
Rescheduling sales and stock transfer documents: by material
Description
The 'Rescheduling' program (SDV03V02) processes sales document items that are contained in the item directory for the material. It takes into consideration open items and schedule lines from stock transfer items, stock transfer scheduling agreements and purchase order requests (items only), referred to hereafter as stock transfer documents, for the materials.
All sales documents for the material that are still open are selected. This means that the material index must be activated for at least all sales document types, whose items may have requirements. All stock transfer documents or items for the material that are still open are also selected. Open in this case means for example, that there is no deletion indicator, that the item from a stock transfer purchase order request cannot be labeled as completed or that the quantity delivered and posted to goods issue for the item in a stock transfer purchase order is the same as the amount ordered. An availability check can only be carried out if a checking rule is assigned to the document type - if this is not the case, the document or document item is not checked.
Checking rule 'A' is used as a basis for rescheduling sales orders (exceptions to this are rush orders they use checking rule B, and orders with individual customer stock; they use checking rule AE). Stock transfer documents use the checking rule that is assigned in Customizing for Purchasing. It is important that the scope of checks is consistent for both the stock transfer documents and the sales documents and that they do not exclude each other, as this can lead to incorrect test results. An example of an incorrect setting would be: The scope of check for checking rule 'A' checks delivery schedules for stock transfer purchase orders and stock transfer purchase requests, however the scope of check for the checking rule for the stock transport scheduling agreement does not.
The items and schedule lines found in the selection are sorted according to 'Priorities' - document category, delivery priority, creation date of the item or schedule line (for stock transfer purchase orders and delivery plans) entered on the selection screen or according to the schedule line date of the earliest schedule line with order quantity, document number and item number and then transferred to the availability check. Priority 1 is highest priority and priority 5 the lowest. Stock transfer purchase order requests are sorted after stock transfer purchase orders and scheduling agreements, as they are less binding. This means that when you have identical sort criteria such as delivery dates, the stock transfer purchase order item is checked first and then the item from the stock transfer purchase order request.
The preset option 'Unconfirmed documents required' only carries out rescheduling for materials for which there is at least one unconfirmed transaction.
You can use the parameters 'Sorting criteria delivery date' to define whether sorting is carried out with the order quantity after the creation date of the item or the delivery date of the earliest schedule line.
If you mark the 'Simulation' field, the checked documents are not saved. Instead a results list is generated and saved. However, the availability check for the corresponding documents continues as if saving has taken place already, that is, that the simulated list corresponds to the actual one.
Under 'Options' on the selection screen, specify whether sales documents and/or stock transfer documents should be processed. For stock transfer documents you can enter whether stock transfer purchase orders and scheduling agreements should be processed at item or schedule line level:
Processing at item level:
All open schedule lines for the item are read and collected, then transferred to the availability check. To sort and prioritize documents, you do not need each individual schedule line. It is sufficient to have the item or data from the first schedule line. All open schedule lines for the item are processed and checked.
Example of processing at item level:
Sorting: Date (Delivery date first schedule line) - Document number - Document item
Doc. cat. Doc. number Doc. item Doc. schedule line Delivery date PO        4500000012      10               0001              26.01. PO        4500000012      10               0002              26.02. PO        4500000025      20               0001              28.01. PO        4500000025      20               0002              02.02.
You can see that the second schedule line for document 4500000025/20 from 02.02 was processed after the second schedule line for document 4500000012/10 from 26.02. This is because all open schedule lines for an item are read and processed. The first schedule line from 4500000012/10 has the earliest delivery date, therefore it has priority.
Processing at schedule line level:
Each open schedule line for an item is entered in document sorting in accordance with the values entered under 'Priorities'. The availability check is carried out for each individual schedule line.
Example for processing at schedule line level:
Sorting: Date (delivery date first schedule line) - document number -document item
Doc. cat.    Doc. number Doc. item Doc. sched. line Del. date PO           4500000012    10             0001           26.01. PO           4500000025    20             0001           28.01. PO           4500000025    20             0002           02.02. PO           4500000012    10             0002           26.02.
Here you can see that each schedule line was sorted according to its delivery date. Note that this type of processing requires more runtime due to the individual checks and more frequent saving.
The results of rescheduling are saved, as long as the program was not started in simulation mode. When calling up from the 'Sales' area menu or when directly starting via the development environment, the iniator is informed via a dialog box that he has just started a process that changes data. He can then decide whether or not he wants to continue.
Checking procedure for stock transfer documents:
An availability check of stock transfer documents in rescheduling is carried out in accordance with the check carried out when manually creating a document. If, however, the required quantity for a schedule line is not available on a particular date and will not be ready until later, new schedule lines are created for the stock transfer purchase orders and scheduling agreements, containing the relevant data. New items are created in this case for stock transfer purchase order requirements. The total sum of schedule line quantities for a processed schedule line corresponds to the schedule line quantity of the original schedule line.
First example: Using a stock transfer purchase order item with a schedule line:
a) Status of item before rescheduling run:
Del. date PO quantity   Confirmed quant Confirmed del. date 23.07.      50 items       0 items              -
==> This now affects the stock/requirement situation:
    - Goods issue is posted for the material in the delivering plant on the 23.07.
    - A purchase order of 10 items was created for the material in the delivering plant. Delivery is expected on the 29.07.
b) Status of stock transfer purchase order item after rescheduling run:
Del. date PO quantity   Confirmed quant   Confirmed del. date 23.07.     40 items      40 items            23.07. 29.07.     10 items      10 items            29.07.
==> The first schedule line was changed in accordance with the results of the rescheduling availability check. Only 40 of the 50 original items could be delivered on the 23.07. Therefore, a new schedule line is created for the rest on the 29.07. for 10 confirmed items.
Second example: Same output situation as the above example.
==> There is now a change in the requirement/stock situation:
A purchase order for 10 items is created for the material in the delivering plant. Delivery is expected on the 29.07. A further purchase shows another 40 planned items on the 30.07.
   Status of stock transfer purchase order item after rescheduling run:
Del. date PO quantity Confirmed quant Confirmed del. date 29.07.     10 items       10 items          29.07. 30.07.     40 items       40 items          30.07.
==> The first schedule line was changed in accordance with the result of the availability check for rescheduling. The original delivery date is set to the date confirmed in the ATP check. A new schedule line is created for the remaining 40 items, that are available on the 30.07.
Note:
Any set fixed delivery date and quantity indicators and creation indicators for schedule lines or items are 'inherited' by newly created schedule lines. Assuming that the original schedule line was fixed in the above example (since it is created manually), this indicator is also set for the newly created schedule line.
If shipping scheduling is activated for a stock transfer document type, this is also implemented for newly created schedule lines, with the exception of route schedule determination. This means that in the current version of the program no route schedule has been determined for a schedule line containing a route schedule for which new schedule lines may need to be created.
The results of the run are issued in the form of a list, which is also saved, so that the results can be controlled at a later date. This is done using the function 'Evaluate rescheduling', but it is only a good idea to do this after the first rescheduling has taken place. You can restrict selection requirements but these can however affect the runtime. You can use this function to analyze the saved list until the next rescheduling run, which writes over the result. If you start rescheduling in the background, a spool file with the result list referred to will be created in the corresponding setting. You can see this in spool management.
Output
A list of changed documents, a list of documents in which an error occurred during processing and as a result were not changed, can be called up via the menu 'Edit - Error log'. If in a subsequent evaluation a restricted selection is carried out, a note appears at the end of the list to say that not all document items are displayed.
You can set the scope of the list under the menu option 'List' in the list display. You can view improvements, deteriorations and the whole list. Before the documents can be included in one or either of the restricted lists, the date or quantity has to have changed so that the item can be contained in both the list of improved or deteriorated documents.
You can use the interface for changing transactions and the order list to navigate. Use 'Back' to exit the list and 'New selection' to return to the selection screen.
Recommendation
You should only start this program occasionally and use very restricted selectin criteria during working hours as it requires enormous system resources.
Note
The columns for 'New date' and 'New confirmed qty' only contain entries if the dates or quantities have changed.
As the system only runs the change check (dates/quantities) per line in the original list, an item whose backlog has increased in the list of improvements. This occurs, for example, if the whole quantity can be delivered at once but at a later date. In this situation, the system determines an increase for the line when it compares quantities.
Regards,
Amrish Purohit

Dectivate pricing condition for sales order not service order.

Hi,
We are on ECC6.0 and CRM5.0
I need to add new condition type to the existing pricing procedure.It should be activtaed only for service orders and not for sales order.I can achive this by adding new requirement in pricing procedure to limit this condition type based on order type.
Example: if KOMK-AUART eq ORDER_TYPE.
sy-subrc = 0.
But I don't want to do this,because I would need to change this requirement everytime I add new service order type.
Is there any field in Pricing structure KOMK bu using which we can achieve this. ?
Please suggest any other idea by which I can achieve this
Thanks
Dona

Currently ,we have one pricing procedures for both the scenarios...
We control if the perticular condition type to be active or not by writing a requirement which checks the order types.
This has been done this way because we built the pricing procedure in ECC and tranfer it to CRM.Also we donot have service orders in ECC.
any further alternatives guys..

FI content for IS based ECC backend

Is the FI business content the same as the regular R/3 business content if the source system is a IS (Industry specific- for exampe-retail) ECC SAP system. The reason i ask is the BI business content contains specific IS related cubes, Data sourses etc for Sales, Inventory etc but i dont see any FI related content under that
Thanks

Hi,
Cross-Application Components -> Financial.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/e1/8e51341a06084de10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/65/7beb3cad744026e10000000a11405a/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/bp_biv235/BI_EN/html/BW/FinancialAccounting.htm
http://www.sapgenie.com/sapfunc/fi.htm
http://www.sap-img.com/sap-download/sap-tables.zip
for tables check out link
http://www.sapgenie.com/abap/tables_fi.htm
http://www.sap-img.com/sap-fi.htm
Data Extraction -Line Item Level- FI-CO
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a7f2f294-0501-0010-11bb-80e0d67c3e4a
and bi best practice
http://help.sap.com/bp_biv335/BI_EN/html/BW/FinancialAccounting.htm
business content datasources, check respective datasources, delta is explained
GL
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/ed/e0143c5bd7b600e10000000a114084/framset.htm
AR
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/79/0d163c240a9440e10000000a114084/framset.htm
AP
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/79/0d163c240a9440e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
FICO
ttps://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a7f2f294-0501-0010-11bb-80e0d67c3e4a
basic knowledge
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/e1/8e51341a06084de10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
FI
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/56/df293581dc1f79e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
CO
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/1e/e9293504e1fd77e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
Hope this helps,
Regards
CSM Reddy

How to implement the selection range of ECC in the CRM WEB UI.

HI Experts.
I want to use the selection range like ecc range in the crm web ui,and use the context node attribute.
thanks very much.

Hi Shawn,
Do you mean you would like to have "is between" selection operator for sales org in CRM, as an example?
Please check the screen shots attached, do you mean you want the selection by range as shown in the pic for the sales order id also for the sales org ?
If yes, I'd like to say it is possible to be enhanced. As you can see for the dropdown of operators for sales org ID, it only has is or is not. Whether it is possible to include "is between"?
Option 1:
in view CRMV_DQ_ATTROP, please locate the dynamic search object you are interested, and locate the attribute/field, from there you can configure the possible operators.
Option 2:
in method GET_DQUERY_DEFINITIONS, you may try to append the extra operators into the internal table.
Hope this could do help!
Hongyan

Catalog views for ERP E-Commerce for MySAP ERP ECC 5.0

We are implementing the R/3 version of CRM-ISA (ERP E-Commerce for MySAP ERP ECC 5.0).
We need to implement product catalog views to allow filtering based on specific attributes.
We have created a custom function module Z_ISA_READ_CATALOG_COMPLETE to replace ISA_READ_CATALOG_COMPLETE and Z_ISA_CUSTOMER_READ_CAT_VIEWS to replace ISA_CUSTOMER_READ_CAT_VIEWS.
But when we test from ISA the FM Z_ISA_READ_CATALOG_COMPLETE does not get invoked through RFC.
There is an SAP NOTE 998453 that we checked but it is still a pilot version.
Has anyone implemented the catalog views without the notes? Can we do the catalog views without the note? If so, how can we meke custom FM work? Please advice.
Thanks,
VK

Check the following.
1. The XCM file modification-config.xml replaces both the function modules
2. The checkbox to use the catalog views is checked for your webshop
3. Catalog is published to TREX and you are using TREX catalog instead of Memory catalog.
I don't think these notes work without TREX. I'd be interested in learning if anyone successfully implemented Catalog views with ECC ECO without using TREX.
- Kishore

Implementing BP for Sales in ECC 5.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for