Inaccurate JE hitting wrong Internal Order

Hi
We got a journal entry posted during the month of February through FI (FB50). The JE got one P&L a/c (debit) and balance sheet a/c (credit). The P&L entry consist of a real internal order..That particular internal order consist of a budget (KO22) as well JE was posted for February without any errors. Budget also consumed accurately. The internal order was settled (KO8G) during the month end for the month of February and it had hit the respective cost center without errors.
This month we realized that the JE should not have been used an internal order. It should hit only a cost center. Not an internal order.
How to correct this entry? Please let me know the steps.. Budget also need to be revised to the original figure
Thanks

Hi Srikanth
Thanks for the reply
The orginal JV was posted by,
Debit - Expense (with internal order)
Credit - Bank
Internal order was settled during the month end and it has hit the cost center.
If I do the JV you mentioned, dont you think the cost center value will be double coz the settlement of the internal order has hit the cost center as well?
What will happen if I reverse the JV through FB08 and put a new JV with correctly..and suppliment the budget through KO24?? I guess the internal order problem will not get sorted if I do that right??
Thanks

Similar Messages

Employee cost should hit to Internal order

Dear Friends,
We started new plant and hired employers ,cost center profit center not ready yet( we created one Internal order as over head order ).
Employee Cost through Payroll so HR People has already created a new Organizational Unit and we have tagged it to an Internal Order. We have hired some test employees and have run payroll for this newly hired employees.
So the system is throwing the following errors.
Error 1)*Account assignment objects are incorrect. No substitution is possible.*
*Message no. 3G209*
*Diagnosis*
*The account assignment object check showed that, from the point of view of CO, the specified account assignment is not valid, and cannot be replaced by the employee's master cost center or a substitute cost center. This item cannot be posted.*
Error 2)Internal error: No valid return value for segment found
Message no. 3G330
Diagnosis
No valid value was returned as a result of the segment check. The Customizing settings for the general ledger, however, request a value for the account assignment of the segment.
Error 3)No segment found
Message no. FAGL_ORG_UNITS007
Diagnosis
No segment could be derived for the current line.
However, in the Customizing settings for General Ledger Accounting, you have selected the segment as a mandatory balancing field. This means that a segment must be assigned in each line item.
System Response
The posting is rejected.
Procedure
Edit your segment derivation or make changes to the Customizing settings for document splitting.
Kindly suggest me onthis its very urgent.
Regards,
Sudha.

Dear Raviteja,
Thanks for your Reply ,
Allready i checked the link which you have provided but our case is different.
Actually the Employee Cost should hit to Internal order not to cost center.(that is our requirement)
While creating internal order i didnt maintain any profit center bcoz cost center and profit centers are not ready yet for time being we are planning to move Employee cost to internal order later we will settle to Cost centers once its ready.
Thanks & regards,
Swapna.
Edited by: swapnasudha chowdary on Jan 24, 2012 11:59 AM

Wrong internal order budet been carry forward, reverse KOCO

Hi SAP Expert,
Our customer is select variatn SAP&01 in KOCO for budget carry forward process on end of 2009. Order type Z001, Z002 & Z003 is been carry forward.
Now user find out that order type Z001 & Z003 should not be carry forward from 2009 to 2010.
Is there any posting or tcode to revese back internal order document been posted in 2010 for order type Z001 & Z003?
The wrong document been carry forward is posted with activity "CfSdr" .
Please advice is there any possible to reverse carry forward run or do manual posting adjustment to offset amount been carry forward from 2009 to 2010.
Thanks.
regards,
ng chong chuan

Hello Chong Chuang,
It is possible to process the carry forward program more than once for
a fiscal year. Each time, budgets are carried forward that were NOT
included in previous runs.
To rerun the carry forward program, you do this directly in the KOCO
transaction. There is no specific reversal option, since the
system only carries forward amounts which were previously NOT
carried forward. You simply rerun the program for the fiscal year
desired. You can try this in TEST run to begin with, to
verify what amounts will be carried forward.
I hope this information helps you.
Kind regards,
C. Garcia

Wrong internal order number for internal number range

Hi,
I have created an internal order type and assigned the internal number range 450000-459999. When we checked the numbers given for the system there are missing numbers. For example; the numbering is OK up to 450013 numbered order and the next order has 450020 number, and next one has the 450040
number.
I checked the COAS table and there are no number used by any other order. What can be the reason for this situation? How can we fix the problem? Is there any one who face the same problem?
What are your suggesitions...
Thanks in advance
Ahmet

Hi,
I have similar kind of query. How to use the numbers that the system jumped? Is there any record/history of unused numbers present in any table? Thanks in Advance!
Regards,
Nidhi

11i Internal Orders hitting AAP

Hi All,
Would appreciate your advice on the following scenario,
Customer is on 11i. They do internal orders for which they do not charge on the shipping side and do not invoice on the receiving side as these are inter-company and they do not want any cost associated with ‘sharing’ materials.
They do this process between organizations with no problem however, between companies, they are seeing that the AAP is CR in the accounting and ITR and PPV are Debited. Accounting balances but, due to the fact that client does not want any charges to and from companies in the same org they do not want the AAP or the PPV accounts to be hit, they only want these transactions to hit INV and ITR accounts.
Is anyone aware if there is a way to do this or if it is even possible?

So, you wanted the costs to post statistically to the order and real to the cost center. At this point you are probably better off creating a new order and marking it as statistical. You can then do a Journal voucher to move the money off the existing real order and post the new order statistically and the cost center as the real object.
Going foreward, you should probably default the order type to have the statistical flag automatically set. You can do that by assigning a model order to the order type. In the model order you would have the statistical flag set. If you also want to use the same order type as a real order then make sure the statistical flag is changeable and the users can then uncheck the statistical flag in the order. You can do that with the field status settings. However, if it is a real order then you also need to assign a settlement profile for the order type and maintain a settlement rule in the order.
thanks,

Internal orders with no profit centers or profit center wrong

Hi There,
Business recently made a decision to change profit center 8009 to 8014.
Now when the status of internal orders are changed, something is triggered that changes the profit center back to 8009 or makes it blank, meaning there is no assigned profit center.
Any help would be highly appreciated as to what can be done to fix this problem.
Regards,

It appears that you have ticked the indicator "Revenue postings allowedu201C in the order type to control whether revenues can be posted to an order.
Please discuss with business/ functional team and if they agree, then you can remove the tick, that would solve the problem.
Otherwise, you have to correct PCA assignment entry at posting level.

Segment derivation when posting invoice on internal order

Dear colleagues,
I have configured the New General Ledger in SAP ECC 5.0, with profit center and segment as splitting characteristics. Document splitting and segment derivation are working fine for almost all scenarios, but not for all scenarios.
When a post a vendor invoice with FB60 to only a cost center document splitting and segment derivation are working correctly: the segment is derived from the profit center (which is assigned to the cost center in the master data of the cost center) and I can post the invoice.
However, when I post the vendor invoice to both a cost center and an internal order segment derivation does not work: I get the error message GLT2201 "The field Segment marked as balancing is not filled with any value in line item 001, even after document splitting."
The reason for this is that the posting on the cost center becomes statistical and the posting on the internal order is the actual posting. In the master data of the internal order I have not defined a profit center. Because of this the DUMMY profit center is assigned to the line item.
I have assigned all profit centers to a segment (in the profit center master data), except for the DUMMY profit center. I guess this is correct?? I can easily solve this issue by assigning the dummy profit center to some kind of dummy segment, but I don't think this is the correct solution.
A solution might be to enter a profit center in the master data of the internal order (segment can then be derived from this profit center). However, I prefer not to put a profit center in the master data of the internal order.
Does any of you have experience the same kind of problem? Can anybody give me some advice how to derive the segment correctly in the aboven mentioned posting? Did I do something wrong in the customizing?
Thanks for your help in advance!
Regards,
Koert

I have already found the solution myself. In the customizing you can define a default segment that will be used in case no segment can be derived in the posting.
IMG: Financial Accounting (New) --> General Ledger Accounting (New) --> Business Transactions --> Document Splitting --> Edit constants for nonassigned processes
Regards,
Koert

How to get internal order and activity type other than from BSEG

We want the Internal order and activity type fields. From BSEG, it is taking a long time, and it hangs.
Is there any other table we can get these values from?
Our query is this:
select bukrs "Company code
gjahr "Fiscal year
belnr "Document no.
buzei "Document Item no.
aufnr "Internal order
lstar "Activity type
from bseg
into table gt_add_info
for all entries in gt_gl_detail
where bukrs = gt_gl_detail-rbukrs"Comcode from G/L acct detail
and buzei = gt_gl_detail-buzei "Doc item no. from G/L acct detail
and belnr = gt_gl_detail-belnr "Doc no. G/L acct detail
and gjahr = gt_gl_detail-gjahr."Fiscal yea
Can advise please how to make it faster. My internal table (GT_GL_DETAIL) has over 100000 records. ? thanks.

I did a SQL trace, and saw that tables CSLA, CSSL, COKL and COKA are being hit with the values I entered inthe Activity type in transaction FB50.
Still not clear but where it gets stored. If in any of these tables, how do I get the object key?

Goods Receipt through internal order with movement type 262

Dear Friends,
some of our users making entries like the following
1. created Internal Order
2. Creating Reservation with movement type 262 ( which not issued material through movemnt type 261)
3. Stock updated
i just want to confirm, we not issued like X material, even stock not available, we can make entries like the above, To receive X material from Internal order/ subcontractor using movement type 262.
kindly advice please if it is wrong then tell me the process.
Regards,
Rajesh G

HI,
if we receive material from subcontractor what process we can do...
can you explain your issue exactly what problem you have at your end .
I think you want to take subcontracting material inside which is not in sap system now,it may finished material or it may component.If you don't want to show this material as at vendor now
then you can try movement type 501 or through physical inventory t-code MI10
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Internal order number is not picking in Capital PO

Dear All,
While creating capital PO the account assignment tab internal order number field is not getting updated. While entering the asset number the internal order number field shows blank.
Kindly advise me to rectify the setting, If I done wrong.
Thanks...
Edited by: saravana j on Jun 14, 2010 10:33 AM

Yes this is correct. How the system should know the internal order?
When you use a combination assets / internal orders the proces steps are:
Create a investment internal order
Assign the PO to the internal order order.
The costs are posted on the IO
Settle the cost to the AUC
Final setle the costs from the AUC to the final asset

Settling investment internal orders to an asset (AA310 msg)

hi.
I am wondering if somebody can shed some light for me on the following:
let's say we have 2 investment internal orders (representing 2 different projects) which are to be settled to one asset.
for the 1st order the job was done and the status changed to TECO in 2010. Upon full settlement (KO8G, full ) the cost has been settled to an asset (from AuC) and the asset has been capitalized. the capitalization (aquisition) date was set to the end of the period (e.g. Dec 31, 2010).
the status of the 2nd order has been changed to TECO in 2011. Currently when I'm trying to do a full settlement of the 2nd IO (with KO8G, partial capilazation) I'm getting AA310 (asset value date in diff year) as far as the system is trying to default the asset value date to date when the IO status was chagned to TECO (2011). I do not want to default the asset value date on the KOG8 screen.
The question - what is wrong in my approach and what should I do in the case I have a second investment orders to settle to a final asset.
Sorry if I was not clear, i'm primarly an abaper but trying to understand some business processes related to internal orders and settlement. any information to understand this relationship would be appreciated.
thank you,
viktor

Creation of Internal Order- KO01
Maintain Settlement receiver as the AUC asset
Settle the Internal Order- KO88
Now the values have come to AUC asset
Distribution of AUC- AIAB
Enter the Settlement receiver as the Main Asset
Settlement of AUC- AIBU

Internal Order Residual Balance carry forward.

Hello Team,
I am new dealing with Internal Orders, but I would like some guidance on the following:
1- We created an internal order las year in Nov. 2007, but when I did the balance carry forward it appeares that the residual balance for I/O did not transferred. I noticed that by running report S_ALR_87013019. At the time of a creation of PO the system wll give me a msg of budget exceeded. So how do I Carry forward the residual budget into the new year? the only way I was able to resolve the issue for now is by deactivating the I/O T-code T-code K032 but then this defeats the purpose of I/O
2- How do I set-up tolerance leve for each I/O. I would ilke for user to get a warning 10% before teh budget is about to be exceed and a hard stop 10% after it has ben execeed.
3- How can I configure I/O to send e-mails to managers when budget hits the tolerance level.
Thank You,
Frank F.

Hello and thank you for your reply. But I encoutered the following:
1- I already have budget profile set-up in OKOB
When I went to the menu path that you gave me
(Controlling> Internal Orders> Budgeting and Availability Control-->
Define Tolerance Limits for Availability Control)
Under availability control I only show activate- K030 and deactivate K032. I did not see Define Tolerance Limits for Availabilty control.
So I am still at a stand still. as to how to set-up Tolerance levels and how to assign it to I/O.
but, you answer the e-mail notification, we do not have workflow set-up so it will not work.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Frank

Is there a way to redetermine the cost center for an internal order on a PO

When we create a PO for an asset we enter an internal order number and a cost center is determined from the internal order. Sometimes after the po is created the cost center on the IO changes. The po is not updated automatically on the PO and it results in the wrong cost center being posted to during the Goods Receipt and invoice receipt. Is there a program or batch job that we can run that will redetermine the accounting data on a PO?
Thanks!
Chris Lintner

When we create a PO for an asset we enter an internal order number and a cost center is determined from the internal order. Sometimes after the po is created the cost center on the IO changes. The po is not updated automatically on the PO and it results in the wrong cost center being posted to during the Goods Receipt and invoice receipt. Is there a program or batch job that we can run that will redetermine the accounting data on a PO?
Thanks!
Chris Lintner

BAPI KPF6 POST PLAN COST FOR INTERNAL ORDER AND COST ELEMENT

Hi all gurus,
I would like to use in a custom report a BAPI/Function Module that help me to simulate KPF6 in order to post planning costs for internal order and cost element (layout 1-401).
So the input should be:
1) Version
2) period from
3) periodo to
4) year
5) internal order n.
6) cost element n.
7) value
I found a lot of BAPI but don't know the correct one and how to use it (example how to fill the input value).
Can anyone help me on that?
Kind Regards

In additio to the previous I found the BAPI_COSTACTPLN_POSTPRIMCOST but don't know if it's the correct one and how to use it (some example fitting the my case will be very appreciated).
If the quoted BAPI is correct.
I tested it filling all fields as following:
HEADERINFO:
CO_AREA=FFCA
FISC_YEAR=2008
PERIOD_FROM=001
PERIOD_TO=012
DOC_HDR_TX='blank'
INDEXSTRUCTURE:
OBJECT_INDEX=000001
VALUE_INDEX=000004 (hope this point at Interna Order)
ATTRIB_INDEX=000000
COOBJECT:
OBJECT_INDEX=000001
ORDERID=ZO53-08IMZ
TOTVALUE:
VALUE_INDEX=000004
COST_ELEM=3224048
FIX_VALUE= 200,0000
DIST_KEY_FIX_VAL=2
The Return table is set to 0. Nothing happens.....I suspect something related to indexstructure or index is wrong..
Could anyone help me on that?
Kind Regards

AUC down payment hitting wrong GLS

Dear Experts,
We are using down payment for WIP, complete configuration in OBYR OAYB and assignment of down payment GL and down payment clearing GL are assigned in AO90.
We prepare internal orders book all the expenses and will be settled to AUC in the month end.
At the settlement entries posted will be
Down payment asset acquisition – Debit
Down payment asset clearing – Credit
I have run the complete cycle this down payment acquisition is not added to any acquisition account.
At the time of initial down payment also below entry getting posted without hitting any OBYR configured GLS.
Vendor Debit 29A
Bank Credit 50.
The GLs which are configured in OBYR are hitting nowhere.
The down payment transaction in asset explorer should be nullified when final payment is done even that is also not happening.
We are processing the down payment through ME2DP transaction
Please let me know where I have missed the configuration.
With Regards
Uday

Dear Experts,
I am waiting for the guidance how to knock of the values from asset down payment clearing account,
auc asset explorer is showing additional acquisition value which is equal to down payment value.
Total amount settled to the asset is 240000 through ko88.
acquisition value - 200000
down payment value - 40000
Settlement entry posted while settling from internal order to AUC.
Asset acquisition account - 200000 - Debit
Asset down payment acquisition account - 40000 -Debit
Consumption account - 200000 - credit
Asset Down payment clearing account - Credit - 40000
Asset value is showing 40000 extra as acquisition and I can able to settle this 200000 from auc to normal asset.
This 40000 is showing in down payment acquisition and down payment clearing account.
The asset books and gl are not matching because of this additional acquisition value in asset.
Let me know how to knock of this value in asset.
If required I can provide additional inputs.
With Regards
Uday

Inaccurate JE hitting wrong Internal Order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for