Inbound delivery - Route

Hi,
I am trying to create inbound delivery with reference to PO in VL31N. ROUTE is not getting determined for inbound delivery though I had maintained all the prerequisites for the route determination.
In the inbound delivery I see the shipping conditions field is blank. Where to maintain the shipping conditions? I am creating inbound delivery in VL31N by giving vendor number and purchase order number. Is there any provision to maintain shipping conditions at vendor master?
Please advice.
Thanks.

Hi ,
Route determination depends on shipping conditions (Vendor) and transportation group, Your correct you can maintain in Vendor , If you could not find the field in vendor Master Check account group used for the vendor and settings
Refer SAP Note 617086

Similar Messages

Automatically route determination for Normal PO - Inbound delivery

dear MM experts,
we are successful route determination for STO & SO, now we wud like to know whether normal PO, route automatically determined or not.
-while creating PO, we don't find the shipping tab, unlike in sto,
or
-while creating inbound delivery
Please help in giving solution if any one as already implemented
thanx in advance
srihari

Hi, did you solve it? I am having the same problem.

Delivery Date in inbound delivery doc not accurate

Dear all,
I have a question with regards to the wrong delivery date appear in our inbound delivery.
Our inbound delivery is created via a message output in the outbound delivery of a standard SAP cross company stock transport order. The delivery date in the inbound delivery is not correct from a business point of view.
+The correct delivery date in the inbound delivery document should be [the Actual GI date field in the outbound delivery] + [transport time (i.e. route field) in the outbound delivery].+
Either way (i.e. the Actual GI date field is later/earlier than the planned GI in the outbound delivery), the delivery date in the inbound delivery is also wrong.
Do you have any idea? We have tried to change the inbound delivery type EL by setting a flag (i.e. X) in the rescheduling (TVLK-NEUTE), and it still doesnu2019t work.
Please help.
Thanks.
Tuff

implements SAP Note 1316614

Delivery Date in Inbound delivery document not correct

Dear all,
I have a question with regards to the wrong delivery date appear in our inbound delivery.
Our inbound delivery is created via EDI output in the outbound delivery of a standard SAP cross company stock transport order. The delivery date in the inbound delivery is not correct from a business point of view.
+The correct delivery date in the inbound delivery document should be [the Actual GI date field in the outbound delivery] + [transport time (i.e. route field) in the outbound delivery].+
Either way (i.e. the Actual GI date field is later/earlier than the planned GI in the outbound delivery), the delivery date in the inbound delivery is also wrong.
Do you have any idea? We have tried to change the inbound delivery type EL by setting a flag (i.e. X) in the rescheduling (TVLK-NEUTE), and it still doesnu2019t work.
Please help.
Thanks.
Tuff

Does anyone know this problem?
appreciate some feedback.

Link between Inbound Delivery and Sales Order for Third Party

Greetings Gurus,
My client is using a third party business model in a retail setting that fulfills sales order via purchase req --> PO --> Inbound delivery with GR posting --> customer billing document created through batch based on the delviery quantity ('G' in item billing relavence) --> vendor invoice reciept happens subsquently.
My question is this, is there an inexpensive (performance wise) way to link the customer billing and the inbound delivery?
Since the inbound is not in the doc flow i don't think VBFA will suffice. I think the best route would be via schedule line back up, but i have yet to find a link.
There are process implications for this link for reporting and customer service which are a critical to the business. Point will be rewarded for sound advice.
Thanks for your help.

Hi Daneil,
Through the document flow VBFA you can capture the PO number and the link for what you have asked can be found from table EKBE. check out for field BELNR.
regards
prasad

Inbound delivery vendor for STO

Dear Expert,
I did the partner configuration for Vendor and STO for site with partner VN-vendor DP-delivery plant.
But when I create the STO for site no partner data come out for the PO, the partner data didn't copy out from vendor master.
Any advice any further more setting need to do?
I manually input the partner data for the STO and site, then I try to create inbound delivery, following incompleteness came out"Vendor : Account Number of Vendor or Creditor Missing",user need to manually input the partner number for LF-vendor.But when i check the partner setting for inbound delivery, LF is copied out from VN.Any more setting need to do to make sure the partner number of LF is auto copied from PO data.
I have below config. setting:
1. Site master has the vendor partner function as OA -Ordering address,DP- Delivering plant, VN- Vendor and PI-Invoicing Party.
2. Define Permissible Partner Roles per Account Group
3. Partner Settings in Vendor Master Record-Assign Partner Schemas to Account Groups
4. Assign Partner Schemas to Document Types
5. Logistics Execution-Partners-Set Up Partner Determination for Deliveries and "EL" Partner Determination Procedure
Also I have search in the SCN before posting I found same post i.e.Partner Function for STO and relevant inbound delivery but no answer hence posting again kindly extend your help.
With Regards,
Avinash Kowale

Did configure the definition of shipping data for Plant?
Aslo, you have to assign the UB document type to the EL inbound delivery
And Maintain Country and Transportation Zone for Shipping Point (In Route Determination)

Shipment cost in inbound delivery

Dear Experts ,
I am facing a issue regarding shipment cost in inbound delivery processing .
My process is as folows.
1. Create a purchase order
2. Create inbound delivery
3. Create Shipment document
4 Create Shipment cost document.
My shipment cost is calculated on the basis of route.
I am able to determine route in inbound delivery by maintaining transportation Zone in vendor.
How ever when i am attaching that delivery to shipment document route is not determining .
My problem is that without route i cannot calculate cost.
Although we can enter the route manually in shipment document but due huge number of routes user is not ready to input route manually.
Note : I am facing issue in route determination in shipment document in case of inbound delivery.
Any help is appreciable
Regards
Jalaj

Hi,
   If your route is not getting copied from delivery to shipment document, go to the transaction 0VTK (its 0 not O) and go to details of the inbound shipment type (0010 in standard) and maintain the copy routine as 2 or 7 as shown below:
   Save the settings and test the scenario with a new inbound delivery. Now, if you the route is determined in delivery, the same will be copied to shipment, once you click on check in (or once the loading is completed).
    Test the scenario and revert back.
Regards,
AKPT

Inbound delivery grouping

Dear all,
Can you please tell me if there is a possibility of grouping a inbound delivery( criteria same venodr , same route etc)? as we have for outbound delivery.
If yes please explain
Thanks in advance

Ramana,
Thank you for the quick reply.
I am using Inbound delivery type : EL, We are creating inbound deliveries with reference to a PO.
sorry i did not get ur point.
1.where in inbound delivery type i maintain copy routine? As i understand the copying routines should be maintained on the item category. please confirm in lame man's language.
2. Where do i find this KOMDLGN-KZAZU field, to enable it
Really appreciate your interest in the topic
Regards
Sumanth

Actual GR Date in Inbound Delivery takes current Date

Hello Everybody,
The Output SPED gets issued after PGI from the Outbound in an Intercompany, it generates an Inbound automatically.
Problem: On the Inbound the field "Actual GR Date" gets populated with the same date as when PGI occurs. The PGI occurs in the US Plant while the PGR is supposed to occur in Europe. The Route Transit Time is 30 days.
Example: If the PGI Date is today, 18th May the system populates the Inbound Delivery field "Actual GR Date" as 18th May.
Research into Causes:
It appears the system is not adding the Route Transit Time. We used the "New Route Determination Time" the the value "A" for the Inbound as well as the Outbound and we do not maintain entries in Table TROAL. Yet, the Inbound still populates with the PGI Date from the Outbound.
Business Impact:
The ATP in Europe considers Stock In-Transit for real-time updates. So, this Inbound gets considered for ATP in Europe starting from today's date, 18th May 2011; so Europe will start promising their customers that these goods will be available from today; however, in reality the products will be available in Europe only after 30 days. This is the impact of the field "Actual GR Date" on the Inbound Delivery.
Thanks,
SR

Check the SPED functional module how the atcual date is passing.Check with technical team if they can insert alogic the actual date should be after PGI date +30 days as the delay required to reach the material.If you are not able to insert the logic then stop passing the actual GR date in GR.I think it is possible.

Creation of inbound delivery without reference to a PO

Dear gurus,
Let's say that a normal inbound flow is something like this:
PO > Create inbound delivery with reference to PO > inbound shipment > Transfer Order > Confirm Transfer Order > Post Goods Receipt > Putaway
Issue:
My client does not want to create the PO because the PO serves no purpose to them. They want the process to start from inbound delivery.
Question:
1. Can a standalone inbound delivery be created WITHOUT reference to a PO ? If yes, please tell me the configuration and transaction code involved in order to create this standalone inbound delivery.
2. Based on standard configuration, can an inbound delivery be created automatically with reference to a material document (for eg MIGO Mvt Type 501). Once again, for this scenario, no PO should be involved. If yes, please tell me the configuration and transaction code involved in order to trigger the creation of this inbound delivery (I'm not looking for the answer of an inbound delivery creation BAPI to being triggered directly after the creation of the Material Document).
3. Based on standard configuration, can an inbound delivery be created manually with reference to a material document (for eg MIGO Mvt Type 501). Once again, for this scenario, no PO should be involved. If yes, please tell me the configuration and transaction code involved in order to create this inbound delivery.
Thanks.

Hi Peter,
Actually, my intention is not really to create an inbound delivery based on a goods receipt. Since my client is not keen on the idea of creating a PO, I'm actually trying to provide alternatives and workarounds. From what I have gathered, I already know this much
-> An inbound delivery must be created with reference to PO unless Handling Unit Management is activated. If Handling Unit Management is activated, the creation of a Material Document will trigger the creation of an inbound delivery (I havent tested this out yet). Therefore, a PO will not be necessary in this case.
I was kind of expecting answers along this line, unless of course, something better pops up. Maybe someone out there may know something more.
As for Handling Units, I'm not familiar with it. Hopefully somebody can give me a good configuration guideline on what to do in order to activate it so that I can simulate the scenario of a Material Document triggering the creation of an inbound delivery (I'm not looking for the kind of answers which simply cuts and pastes the SAP HELP URL, 4.6C Handling Unit PDF, Best Practice Document and etc). Hopefully somebody out there can really give me a good guideline on how to do this.
Thanks..

Creation of Inbound delivery mandatory for ASN process in classic scenario?

Dear Experts,
We are going for classic scenario for our green field SRM implementation process. Our client is not using ASN process in their existing MM process. However, they are now looking for an oppurtunity to enable Suppliers to trigger ASN using SUS. In such case, is creation of inbound delivery from Buyer side a mandatory process?
Is the below the process correct?
PO -> ASN (Supplier using SUS) -> Inbound delivery (Optional) -> Goods Receipt (Mandatory) -> Invoicing.
Here, I understand that Goods receipt can be verified against the PO or via Inbound delivery to PO. ASN will inform the store keeper in advance about impending goods receipt and smoothen the confirmation process.
Could you please comment on the above process? Could you please suggest the best practices followed here?
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan
Ranjan Sutradhar

Hey Ranjan!,
You are on track.
The process flow you have shown is true. ASN is available as a standard as part of the MM-SUS process. It makes the buyer aware of any delays in delivery or to make arrangements on shipping docks to receive goods on a said date etc.
Regards,
Nikhil

ASN creation based on ECC inbound delivery

Hi All,
I have a scenario in which we are creating an inbound delivery in ECC and corresponding ASN should be created in supplier system.
In order to achieve this functionality of ECC to supplier system is there any way to map this functionality through any custom development ?
Kindly suggest
Thanks
Gaurav Gupta

Hi,
What I understand from the requirement is - The Supplier dispatches the material to Purchasing company & informs about the same via ASN. This ASN triggers inbound delivery in ECC. When the material reaches the Purchasing Company, GRN is posted with reference to the Inbound Delivery.
Is this correct?
If so, you can achieve this through RFC function, which can be called from vendor ERP system or through Vendor Portal by directly calling the RFC or by using Web Service.
Regards,
Prashant

Error in creation of inbound delivery

hi
When I tried to create inbound delivery against schedule agreement
1) Following warning message is coming when I enter the quantity for each and every line item
u201CAcknowledgment for PO item contains data varianceu201D
2)Following error message is coming when I saved the delivery
u201CTermination during purchase order updateu201D
So I am unable to create the inbound delivery
Note: this error is coming for a particular vendor only

Hi ,
Goto SM13 .
Find the terminations based on user and creation date.
Get the same analysed by ur ABAP team.
Also check the confirmations in PO at Item level.
Regards
Ramesh Ch

Inbound Delivery: Inbound WHSCON IDoc with Batch Split - HowTo...?

Hello
We have another tricky problem to solve on our ERP 6.0 system.
My colleagues of Lindt UK create manually inbound deliveries (VL33N) which are replicated to the warehouse (DESADV IDoc -> TRADACOMS.ORDHDR).
When the goods arrive at the warehouse they send back a good receipts message (TRADACOMS.DLCHDR -> WHSCON IDoc).
In some cases we have a batch split because the goods have been put into different storage locations. Example:
- item 10: 200 Cases of product 4711, batch 10-2011, in storage location '0001' (free available for Sale)
- item 10:     5 Cases of product 4711, batch 10-2011, in storage location '0004' (damaged)
I am aware that in the inbound WHSCON item 10 is a main position and the two actual batch split positions are sub-items (900001 & 900002 with HIPOS = '10'). I tried to used E1EDL19-QUALF = 'BAS' (= batch split) with the sub-items but failed so far to update the inbound delivery that I can see the batch split.
I have managed to get one sub-item but not 2 of them. Somehow the system aggregates the quantities for both sub-items into the single item that shows up in the inbound delivery.
When we send the inbound delivery to the warehouse the item looks like this:
- item 10: 200 Cases (no batch yet, Putaway quantity = 0, because these data are coming from the warehouse).
QUESTION: Has anybody else been faced with a similar (if not identical) problem and how did you solve it?
Thanks a lot in advance for your valuable input.
Regards
Uwe

Hello Finbarr
I assume that you do NOT send any (suggested) batches to your warehouse. Otherwise you would have the same problem like we have that the WHSCON cannot overwrite a (suggested) batch.
However, if you just send the quantity per item then the batch split is much simpler than you suggested:
"First E1EDL24 segment:
POSNR     50
MATNR     000000000000602006
MATWA     000000000000602006
CHARG     L1519   " <<< first batch
LFIMG     37.000
VRKME     CT
"Second E1EDL24 segment:
POSNR     50
MATNR     000000000000602006
MATWA     000000000000602006
CHARG     L1880   " <<< second batch
LFIMG     37.000
VRKME     CT
Well, and as qualifier we use: E1EDL19-QUALF = 'XYZ' " a dummy
The SAP system is smart enough the realize that these two E1EDL24 segment belong to the same item yet have different batches and, therefore, yield a batch split in the delivery. The system generated the 9xxxxx numbers for this sub-item lines automatically.
Although I believe that it is not possible to change a batch in the delivery using an inbound WHSCON I would appreciate to have a final proof of this assumption. I could imagine that if you first delete the item containing the suggested batch and then add a new item with the actual batch from the warehouse it might works. However, this would require to implement a user-exit which I do not prefer.
Regards
Uwe
PS: It seems I gave an answer to the wrong question (should be EDI (DESADV): Can batches be overwritten by an inbound WHSCON (pick conf)? )

Reg: How to capture the Excise Invoice with respect to Inbound delivery

Hi All,
Please give the process follow for capturing the excise invoice with respect to inbound delivery.
Thanks & Regards
Siva

Hi Siva,
Please check this link
CIN with Example..?
Regards,
Bijoy Kumar

Inbound delivery - Route

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for