Inconsistent Speedtest Results

I recently noticed slow speeds so I tried two speedtests right after eachother.  The first was on speedtest.net and had this result: http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/4464458407  The second was on speedtest.comcast.net and had this result: http://results.speedtest.comcast.net/result/944128404.png Why the huge difference?  My internet speeds on all websites I've checked are consistent with the first, slower test.

This may now be fixed for you. If you check my thread "How do I report slow download speeds from out-of-area servers?" you'll see that it was spontaneously resolved around midnight mountain time. The problem seems to have been in Denver Comcast's network connection to the outside world. The Comcast network in Colorado, New Mexico and Arizona seems to be a common "local" network, and connecting from your home to that network always showed a good speed. That's why http://speedtest.comcast.com gave a good result: because it was local. However, if the data you were trying to download needed to come from outside those three states, it balked. That happened when either you used http://speedtest.comcast.com and pointed it to any server outside those three states (instead of just using the local default), or you used http://speedtest.net instead. I can't tell you whether it was deliberately fixed or whether it just happened because some machine got a scheduled reset at midnight. But it's OK now. Till the next time.

Similar Messages

  • Varying speedtest results

    I am trying to figure out why out of my three PC's on my home network, the one running XP, also the oldest, gets the fastest and most consistant speedtest results., usually around 25-27mb.  the other two run Vista 32bit and one gets around 9-15mb consistantly whilst the other one (the newest PC) gets completely unstable speedtests.  By unstable I mean the needle hovers on say 5 or 6mb and then shoots up to a ridiculous speed like 169mb and settles on a result of 20 something.  I am also having big trouble streaming video on this machine, constant buffering and thats with standard resolution.
    They all run Kaspersky 2012, Firefox lastest version with no script.

    In THIS POST 
    I wrote "I certainly have heard problems with Kaspersky  example http://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Infinity/BT-Profile-Tester/m-p/337429/highlight/true#M18976 "
    Don't worry about the Home Network 100Mbps... That is the Ethernet Port speed you've connected to when wired.
    See my wired 100Mbps pic below..... You could see if it changes if you move to the Gig ethernet port.
    I've never tried that port.
    If your ethernet ports are playing up... say dropping down to 10Mbps causing streaming issues, investigation is underway see the many pages here.-
     http://community.bt.com/t5/BB-Speed-Connection-Issues/HomeHub-3-LAN-speeds-only-10Mb/m-p/390205#M116...
    However a simple factory reset might cure http://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Infinity/Finally-a-fault-Hub3/m-p/359635#M21296
    I use AVG for my antivirus protection... Free version of course  And have never had any streaming or test result probs.
    I don't know if it would be possible to pause the Kapersky and use AVG then try some streaming just to completely eliminate the possibility Kapersky is interfering with your streaming.
    Perhaps someone else might suggest another way ...... Nige maybe? 
    Please Click On any Text in Blue as that automatically links to information.
    PC (NDEGR)

  • LG G2 speedtest results in Richmond, VA

    Got this LG G2 on Black Friday. While the overall performance of the phone is excellent, I am a bit worried with the speedtest results (ookla). I see an average of 2 / <1 Mbps. Also the signal bars are rarely at full strength. Anyone else experiencing this issue?

        I regret to learn of the issues that you are experiencing, femanon! I would like to ensure that all settings are provisioned correctly on your account. Please send me this information in a private message so that I can better assist. I just sent you a follow request, please accept.
    Thank you,
    LenaA_VZW
    Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

  • Inconsistent SDO_RELATE results when querying 2.5D data

    Oracle 11.1.0.7 with Patch 8343061 on Windows Server 2003 32bit.
    I'm getting inconsistent results from SDO_RELATE results when querying 2.5D data. Some geometries I expect to be OVERLAPBDYDISJOINT, are not always being returned by SDO_RELATE when using the OVERLAPBDYDISJOINT mask. It seems that the order of the tables makes a difference to the result.
    Here's a table with one 2.5D geometry and a 2D index:
    CREATE TABLE TEST1 (
    ID                NUMBER PRIMARY KEY,
    GEOMETRY     SDO_GEOMETRY);
    INSERT INTO TEST1 (id, geometry) VALUES (
    1,
    SDO_GEOMETRY(3002, 2157, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 2, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(561695.935, 834005.726, 25.865,
    561696.229, 834005.955, 25.867, 561686.278, 834015.727, 26.088, 561685.179, 834019.771, 26.226, 561680.716, 834022.389, 26.226,
    561674.434, 834025.125, 26.171, 561671.963, 834032.137, 25.667, 561670.832, 834037.185, 25.619, 561667.946, 834042.976, 25.84,
    561666.717, 834047.218, 26.171, 561664.229, 834051.781, 26.778, 561660.041, 834055.935, 26.64, 561657.514, 834061.742, 26.53,
    561658.59, 834067.116, 27.882, 561657.67, 834070.739, 28.821, 561653.028, 834073.777, 29.042, 561653.234, 834078.769, 28.379,
    561658.336, 834080.105, 29.511, 561664.582, 834079.468, 31.94, 561669.257, 834075.821, 33.707, 561672.716, 834074.456, 33.707,
    561676.875, 834077.262, 33.735, 561675.868, 834081.55, 33.707, 561673.131, 834087.641, 33.679, 561672.208, 834093.502, 33.238,
    561668.578, 834100.894, 33.735, 561666.013, 834106.399, 33.679, 561661.408, 834111.23, 33.514, 561654.854, 834117.181, 33.486,
    561651.695, 834122.292, 33.569, 561649.112, 834128.847, 33.431, 561645.982, 834134.786, 33.293, 561642.485, 834141.235, 33.072,
    561642.138, 834150.085, 33.293, 561646.072, 834159.721, 36.578, 561647.274, 834165.532, 37.02, 561646.359, 834170.867, 37.02,
    561645.42, 834175.485, 36.799, 561642.44, 834180.977, 36.826, 561638.677, 834185.419, 36.771, 561636.693, 834194.824, 37.158,
    561635.462, 834202.105, 37.241, 561631.998, 834208.745, 37.268, 561628.871, 834213.994, 37.241, 561627.554, 834220.393, 37.82,
    561625.79, 834226.697, 39.532, 561620.561, 834236.494, 39.891, 561619.265, 834249.687, 39.697, 561619.883, 834260.02, 41.326,
    561620.977, 834264.399, 43.093, 561622.557, 834270.723, 43.452, 561622.172, 834276.978, 43.452, 561621.347, 834285.541, 43.479,
    561622.214, 834292.055, 43.645, 561619.718, 834302.583, 43.755, 561616.762, 834316.47, 43.755, 561608.842, 834328.241, 43.7,
    561606.346, 834334.93, 43.7, 561605.27, 834341.929, 43.7, 561603.925, 834350.648, 43.728, 561602.462, 834358.405, 43.838,
    561599.552, 834366.629, 44.031, 561594.551, 834374.291, 43.396, 561590.644, 834383.986, 43.065, 561588.48, 834392.21, 44.942,
    561586.923, 834397.32, 46.737, 561584.608, 834402.898, 49.299, 561581.389, 834410.194, 50.077, 561580.437, 834419.49, 51.907,
    561580.438, 834427.63, 53.127, 561582.245, 834433.389, 55.791, 561586.664, 834433.397, 57.503, 561593.88, 834433.608, 57.475,
    561596.305,834439.653, 57.42, 561591.804, 834445.862, 57.309, 561589.097, 834447.689, 57.014)));
    SELECT sdo_geom.validate_geometry_with_context(geometry, 0.0005) FROM TEST1;
    DELETE FROM user_sdo_geom_metadata WHERE table_name = 'TEST1' AND column_name = 'GEOMETRY';
    INSERT INTO user_sdo_geom_metadata VALUES ('TEST1','GEOMETRY', 
         MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ARRAY(
         MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X',400000,750000,0.0005),
         MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y',500000,1000000,0.0005),      
         MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Z',-10000,10000,0.0005)     
    ), 2157);
    DROP INDEX TEST1_SPIND;
    CREATE INDEX TEST1_SPIND ON TEST1(GEOMETRY) INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX PARAMETERS ('layer_gtype=line sdo_indx_dims=2');And here's another table with a 2D geometry and a 2D index:
    CREATE TABLE TEST2 (
    ID                NUMBER PRIMARY KEY,
    GEOMETRY     SDO_GEOMETRY);
    INSERT INTO TEST2 (id, geometry) VALUES (
    1,
    SDO_GEOMETRY(2002, 2157, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 2, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(561816.516, 834055.581, 561819.504, 834057.173,
    561817.942, 834060.818, 561810.044, 834078.997, 561805.576, 834087.634, 561801.572, 834094.299, 561798.558, 834100.467,
    561796.254, 834107.637, 561793.754, 834115.605, 561794.049, 834123.694, 561793.698, 834130.518, 561792.905, 834138.883,
    561787.867, 834145.772, 561782.544, 834150.548, 561777.707, 834156.53, 561773.945, 834161.32, 561771.061, 834166.957,
    561768.155, 834173.131, 561764.735, 834178.744, 561759.603, 834187.782, 561756.146, 834195.493, 561753.416, 834198.821,
    561754.141, 834205.691, 561756.768, 834209.681, 561757.217, 834216.701, 561753.086, 834232.46, 561744.371, 834254.589,
    561740.936, 834263.001, 561737.198, 834272.208, 561732.231, 834284.915, 561730.52, 834297.01, 561728.339, 834310.053,
    561727.825, 834328.069, 561730.461, 834342.992, 561729.808, 834367.948, 561730.216, 834396.988, 561732.273, 834419.047,
    561732.783, 834424.668, 561731.647, 834432.212, 561731.872, 834439.436, 561731.39, 834449.269, 561732.041, 834462.813,
    561733.583, 834471.926, 561733.229, 834485.049, 561730.868, 834498.462, 561726.379, 834512.59, 561725.776, 834528.932,
    561727.488, 834555.23, 561729.357, 834577.873, 561731.05, 834595.931, 561731.163, 834611.928, 561734.057, 834637.031,
    561732.67, 834636.4, 561725.401, 834633.796, 561721.039, 834632.493, 561718.777, 834632.167, 561710.437, 834632.888,
    561647.929, 834636.658, 561644.963, 834630.085, 561632.796, 834629.813, 561625.553, 834627.647, 561620.473, 834626.711,
    561608.718, 834624.94, 561599.935, 834619.684, 561596.67, 834613.843, 561594.27, 834607.774, 561592.513, 834601.752,
    561591.349, 834593.899, 561597.265, 834584.888, 561595.956, 834571.479, 561595.075, 834556.196, 561593.997, 834539.68,
    561594.316, 834528.071, 561595.261, 834516.44, 561595.538, 834504.804, 561597.227, 834497.417, 561599.3, 834490.416,
    561601.265, 834482.61, 561605.126, 834475.502, 561599.232, 834473.683, 561593.076, 834471.379, 561599.154, 834451.112,
    561589.097, 834447.689, 561591.804, 834445.862, 561596.305, 834439.653, 561593.88, 834433.608, 561582.245, 834433.389,
    561580.438, 834427.63, 561580.437, 834419.49, 561581.389, 834410.194, 561584.608, 834402.898, 561586.923, 834397.32,
    561588.48, 834392.21, 561590.644, 834383.986, 561594.551, 834374.291, 561599.552, 834366.629, 561602.462, 834358.405,
    561603.925, 834350.648, 561605.27, 834341.929, 561606.346, 834334.93, 561608.842, 834328.241, 561616.762, 834316.47,
    561619.718, 834302.583, 561622.214, 834292.055, 561621.347, 834285.541, 561622.172, 834276.978, 561622.557, 834270.723,
    561620.977, 834264.399, 561619.883, 834260.02, 561619.265, 834249.687, 561620.561, 834236.494, 561625.79, 834226.697,
    561627.554, 834220.393, 561628.871, 834213.994, 561631.998, 834208.745, 561635.462, 834202.105, 561636.693, 834194.824,
    561638.677, 834185.419, 561642.44, 834180.977, 561645.42, 834175.485, 561646.359, 834170.867, 561647.274, 834165.532,
    561646.072, 834159.721, 561642.138, 834150.085, 561642.485, 834141.235, 561645.982, 834134.786, 561649.112, 834128.847,
    561651.695, 834122.292, 561654.854, 834117.181, 561661.408, 834111.23, 561666.013, 834106.399, 561668.578, 834100.894,
    561672.208, 834093.502,561673.131, 834087.641, 561675.868, 834081.55, 561676.875, 834077.262, 561672.716, 834074.456,
    561669.257, 834075.821, 561664.582, 834079.468, 561658.336, 834080.105, 561653.234, 834078.769, 561653.028, 834073.777,
    561657.67, 834070.739, 561658.59, 834067.116, 561657.514, 834061.742, 561660.041, 834055.935, 561664.229, 834051.781,
    561666.717, 834047.218, 561667.946, 834042.976, 561670.832, 834037.185, 561671.963, 834032.137, 561674.434, 834025.125,
    561680.716, 834022.389, 561685.179, 834019.771, 561686.278, 834015.727, 561696.229, 834005.955, 561695.935, 834005.726,
    561677.805, 833994.91, 561683.163, 833985.817, 561703.01, 833949.434, 561725.891, 833961.856, 561744.35, 833971.197,
    561768.396, 833983.86, 561777.842, 833988.883, 561798.333, 833999.743, 561797.243, 834005.725, 561783.574, 834040.515,
    561798.127, 834046.391, 561807.001, 834050.509, 561816.516, 834055.581)));
    SELECT sdo_geom.validate_geometry_with_context(geometry, 0.0005) FROM TEST2;
    DELETE FROM user_sdo_geom_metadata WHERE table_name = 'TEST2' AND column_name = 'GEOMETRY';
    INSERT INTO user_sdo_geom_metadata VALUES ('TEST2','GEOMETRY', 
         MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ARRAY(
         MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X',400000,750000,0.0005),
         MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y',500000,1000000,0.0005)
    ), 2157);
    DROP INDEX TEST2_SPIND;
    CREATE INDEX TEST2_SPIND ON TEST2(GEOMETRY) INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX PARAMETERS ('layer_gtype=line sdo_indx_dims=2');Now if I check how these two geometries relate to each other, the answer is OVERLAPBDYDISJOINT, which makes sense when inspecting the geometries.
    SQL> SELECT
      2  sdo_geom.relate(t1.geometry, 'determine', t2.geometry,  0.0005) relate_1_to_2,
      3  sdo_geom.relate(t2.geometry, 'determine', t1.geometry,  0.0005) relate_2_to_1
      4  FROM test2 t2, test1 t1
      5  WHERE t1.id = t2.id;
    RELATE_1_TO_2        RELATE_2_TO_1
    OVERLAPBDYDISJOINT   OVERLAPBDYDISJOINT
    1 row selected.So, I'd expect this query to return something...
    SELECT /*+ ORDERED */ t1.id, t2.id, sdo_geom.relate(t1.geometry, 'determine', t2.geometry,  0.0005) relate
    FROM test2 t2, test1 t1
    WHERE sdo_relate(t1.geometry, t2.geometry, 'mask=overlapbdydisjoint') = 'TRUE'
    AND t1.id = 1
    AND t2.id = 1;Nada. And this...
    SELECT /*+ ORDERED */ t1.id, t2.id, sdo_geom.relate(t1.geometry, 'determine', t2.geometry,  0.0005) relate
    FROM test1 t1, test2 t2
    WHERE sdo_relate(t2.geometry, t1.geometry, 'mask=overlapbdydisjoint') = 'TRUE'
    AND t1.id = 1
    AND t2.id = 1;Nada.
    And this...
    SQL> SELECT /*+ ORDERED */ t1.id, t2.id, sdo_geom.relate(t1.geometry, 'determine', t2.geometry,  0.0005) relate
      2  FROM test2 t2, test1 t1
      3  WHERE sdo_relate(t2.geometry, t1.geometry, 'mask=overlapbdydisjoint') = 'TRUE'
      4  AND t1.id = 1
      5  AND t2.id = 1;
            ID         ID RELATE
             1          1 OVERLAPBDYDISJOINT
    1 row selected.This version gives the right answer.
    Can anyone explain this?

    Hi,-
    I think you are running into these bugs 7158518 and 7710726.
    Could you please request the patch for the bugs so that they are published on Metalink
    if they dont exist there?
    Please let us know if these fix your problem.
    Best regards
    baris

  • Inconsistent Query Result in SEM-BCS using Virtual Info Provider

    We have just upgraded to BW 7.0 and SEM-BCS 6.0. When we run an existing 3.5 BW query for BCS through the Virtual Info Provider against the basic consolidation cube, we are getting inconsistent results. Sometimes we get the correct result, and other times our results are not rolling up correctly causing an out of balance on our balance sheet query. We did not make any hierarchy changes between the query executions. Has anyone else experienced this? We cannot see the cause of the inconsistency. Everything looks good when running through RSRT DEBUG. Any help on pushing us in the right direction to solve this would be appreciated. 
    Thanks,
    Rob

    Hi Rob,
    Could you please let me know how you have resolved this issue? Thanks.
    Regards,
    Ashok

  • Iphone 4s speedtest results not the same as imac's

    i ran a speedtest on both products (same wifi network of course) and the download speed of my iphone is way too low compared to my imac's. just .5 mbps vs 3mbps on the imac. i already did the network reset on my iphone but still the same results. do i need to do something or do i just have to have my iphone replaced? thanks.
    btw, when i ran a test using my network's 3G, it showed higher results compared to the wifi.

    They should be comparable, but they will never be the same.  The computer has a faster processor so it should be able to download and process the data faster.
    Are the speeds dramatically different?

  • Getting Inconsistent Query Results

    I am getting inconsistent results when trying to filter data based on the DATETIME stamp. Any help will be appreciated.
    Here is my table information.
    TableA:
    SR DATE
    15     8/30/2007 9:34:41 AM
    16     9/4/2007 1:03:38 PM
    17     9/4/2007 2:50:48 PM
    18     9/4/2007 3:04:03 PM
    19     9/5/2007 11:47:58 AM
    20     9/5/2007 12:16:23 PM
    21     9/6/2007 3:34:38 PM
    22     9/6/2007 3:43:27 PM
    23     9/6/2007 3:46:27 PM
    24     9/7/2007 10:14:26 AM
    25     9/7/2007 10:16:11 AM
    26     9/18/2007 1:03:47 PM
    27     9/19/2007 9:31:14 AM
    28     9/19/2007 9:44:36 AM
    29     9/19/2007 4:18:05 PM
    30     9/21/2007 10:44:52 AM
    Now if I execute this query,
    SELECT * FROM TableA WHERE DATE >= '9/3/2007 9:34:41 AM'
    Result (Missing all 2 digit dates:
    16     9/4/2007 1:03:38 PM
    17     9/4/2007 2:50:48 PM
    18     9/4/2007 3:04:03 PM
    19     9/5/2007 11:47:58 AM
    20     9/5/2007 12:16:23 PM
    21     9/6/2007 3:34:38 PM
    22     9/6/2007 3:43:27 PM
    23     9/6/2007 3:46:27 PM
    24     9/7/2007 10:14:26 AM
    25     9/7/2007 10:16:11 AM
    If I change the day in query to 2 digit then I am getting correct results.
    SELECT * FROM TableA WHERE DATE >= '9/03/2007 9:34:41 AM'
    But If I run this query:
    SELECT * FROM TableA WHERE DATE >= '9/05/2007 9:34:41 AM'
    Results (Getting all the dates even less than '9/5/2007':
    16     9/4/2007 1:03:38 PM
    17     9/4/2007 2:50:48 PM
    18     9/4/2007 3:04:03 PM
    19     9/5/2007 11:47:58 AM
    20     9/5/2007 12:16:23 PM
    21     9/6/2007 3:34:38 PM
    22     9/6/2007 3:43:27 PM
    23     9/6/2007 3:46:27 PM
    24     9/7/2007 10:14:26 AM
    25     9/7/2007 10:16:11 AM
    26     9/18/2007 1:03:47 PM
    27     9/19/2007 9:31:14 AM
    28     9/19/2007 9:44:36 AM
    29     9/19/2007 4:18:05 PM
    30     9/21/2007 10:44:52 AM
    The results are so inconsistent with different combination, I could not figure out the main reason behind this.
    The datatype for this field in database is "VARCHAR2(250)" and because of some restrictions, I could not change datatype of this field in the table.

    SQL> DESC t;
    Name                                      Null?    Type
    COL                                                VARCHAR2(50)
    SQL> SELECT col FROM t ORDER BY col;
    COL
    8/30/2007 9:34:41 AM
    9/03/2007 9:34:41 AM
    9/05/2007 9:34:41 AM
    9/18/2007 1:03:47 PM
    9/19/2007 4:18:05 PM
    9/19/2007 9:31:14 AM
    9/19/2007 9:44:36 AM
    9/21/2007 10:44:52 AM
    9/3/2007 9:34:41 AM
    9/4/2007 1:03:38 PM
    9/4/2007 2:50:48 PM
    9/4/2007 3:04:03 PM
    9/5/2007 11:47:58 AM
    9/5/2007 12:16:23 PM
    9/6/2007 3:34:38 PM
    9/6/2007 3:43:27 PM
    9/6/2007 3:46:27 PM
    9/7/2007 10:14:26 AM
    9/7/2007 10:16:11 AMThe ones in bold are your predicate "dates". Do you see why it doesn't work as you expect?
    John

  • Can someone decipher Speedtest results for me?

    I downloaded the speed test x HD app just to see if I'm having the same kind of spotty slow wifi other complain about on the iPad. But to be honest i have no idea about what the results mean. Could some kind helpful tech savvy person give me a crash course in what my results mean? Here they are. Thanks ahead of time for the help
    Download speed: 5800.47 Kbps (5.66 Mbps / 725.06 KB/s)
    Total test time: 14.123 Seconds

    It means your Download speed is 5800.47 Kilobits per sec = 5.66 Megabit per sec. (1 Mega = 1024 kilo, that is why the 2 numbers are not exactly the same.)
    Your Upload speed is 725.06 kilo bits per sec.
    Both speeds are very good for most purposes. That is very typical for most DSL or FiOS connection. Cable connections are usually much slower due to sharing the bandwidth with your neighbors.
    The reason why the download speed is faster than the upload speed is because most DSL is actually aDSL, which means it is asymmetrical for upload/download. That is because most people download info from websites more so than uploading info back to the world, so the network carrier optimizes the performance by allocating more bandwidth to downloads than uploads. Otherwise, if the speeds are symmetrical, your download speed will be cut in half, even though your upload speed will go up, but if you are not using it, it is wasting it.
    Total test time is 14.123 Seconds means it takes 14 sec to complete the round-trip testing between upload and downloads.
    Speedtest X HD does not test for latency. Latency is the delay time between the time the signal is sent from the website to where you are. The latency usually increases with physical distance between 2 points, but other factors also affect the latency, such as the intermediate points that the signal has to hop through before it gets to your iPad, and the processing time it takes for those network equipment to relay the signal. That includes your own wireless router's processing time, and any other routers in transit, and also the software processing speed too.

  • Wiered speedtester results. Is this to hard for yo...

    Hi,  At 13:30 today my HH v2 reset itself twice in the space of five minutes.  I have been facing HH resets of up to ten times a day.  Have tried more than one HH and still get the same resets happening, no matter which HH is plugged in.  The HH is plugged into the test point on the master socket, with filter aqnd is the only socket in the property.  No electrical items within fifteen feet.  Following is the latest speedtest and adsl status results.
    Test1 comprises of two tests
    1. Best Effort Test: -provides background information.
    Download  Speed
    1513 Kbps
    0 Kbps
    2000 Kbps
    Max Achievable Speed
     Download speedachieved during the test was - 1513 Kbps
     For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 800-2000 Kbps.
     Additional Information:
     Your DSL Connection Rate :1870 Kbps(DOWN-STREAM), 892 Kbps(UP-STREAM)
     IP Profile for your line is - 2000 Kbps
    2. Upstream Test: -provides background information.
    Upload Speed
    729 Kbps
    0 Kbps
    892 Kbps
    Max Achievable Speed
    >Upload speed achieved during the test was - 729 Kbps
     Additional Information:
     Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 892 Kbps
    ADSL line status
    Connection information
    Line state
    Connected
    Connection time
    0 days, 9:04:16
    Downstream
    1,870 Kbps
    Upstream
    892 Kbps
    ADSL settings
    VPI/VCI
    0/38
    Type
    PPPoA
    Modulation
    ITU-T G.992.5
    Latency type
    Interleaved
    Noise margin (Down/Up)
    5.9 dB / 6.0 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up)
    62.0 dB / 34.8 dB
    Output power (Down/Up)
    0.0 dBm / 12.8 dBm
    Loss of Framing (Local)
    11
    Loss of Signal (Local)
    1
    Loss of Power (Local)
    0
    FEC Errors (Down/Up)
    2910948 / 2
    CRC Errors (Down/Up)
    1802 / 2147480000
    HEC Errors (Down/Up)
    nil / 1
    Error Seconds (Local)
    5037
    One other thing is, that prior to the resets at 13:30 today the Line Attenuation had always been 60.0dB ever since being migrated to ADSL2.  I noticed that this went up to 62.0dB after the multi reset.  These resets were not manual and happened just as I was walking past the HH.  So in this case, the right place at the right time or I might of not noticed that a double reset had happened.
    What do you make of it?  Thanks in advance.  By the way, BT/W say that they have no record of there ever being a disconnection, even whenan engineer has been to my property or to the exchange.

    The Profile has reset to 1500, sometime during the night.  The trouble is that no matter which HH I have connected,l it keeps resetting up to ten times a day.  All I get from India is, that it must be my computer or laptop that has a fault or that BT/W dose not see any disconnection at their end and if they don't see any disconnect's then it can't be happening.  So therefore I the customer must be giveing false information.  As I said before, BT/W has their set minimum for a line and as long as the speed that you are getting is above that  and they don't see a fault on the line when they run their test's then they ain't going to do anything to help.  I was told last night by India, that BT/W after doing test's found no fault and they rejected the request for investigation.  I was even told by India that the minimum DSL I should be getting is 2272Kbps.  India answer to the HH keep resetting, even though I have tried differant HH's is to send out another HH.  I will try it, but hold very little hope that it will cure the problem.  There is talk that it could be the card in the exchange that is overheating and needs to be replaced.

  • BT Speedtester results - no assured rate

     Download speedachieved during the test was - 7705 Kbps
     For your connection, the acceptable range of speedsis 1000-7150 Kbps.
     Additional Information:
     Your DSL Connection Rate :9356 Kbps(DOWN-STREAM), 1048 Kbps(UP-STREAM)
     IP Profile for your line is - 8000 Kbps
    The throughput of Best Efforts (BE) classes achieved during the test is - 12.71:22.12:65.18 (SBE:NBEBE)
    These figures represent the ratio while sententiously passing Sub BE, Normal BE and Priority BE marked traffic.
    The results of this test will vary depending on the way your ISP has decided to use these traffic classes.
    So these are the results of my speedtest.  There's no 'assured rate' result so I'm assuming there's no QoS running on my line.  Is this normal, should I be worried, what are the likely affects on my BTVision?
    Thanks in advance
    Andy
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hi Peter,
    If you can email me your details and forum username I'll take a look at this, email address is [email protected]
    Thanks,
    Stephanie
    Stephanie
    BTCare Community Manager
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post. If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • BT Speedtester results - recent problem

    I run BT Speedtester every day (don't ask!) and have noticed a problem which first appeared on 8th July 2011.  About half of the tests now show a measured download speed in excess of the IP Profile, today being the worst example at 1597kbps against a Profile of 1000.  Looking back over many months of tests the line speed has consistently been 90-95% of the IP Profile, until this recent change.
    Are there any legit reasons for this happening, or is this a known problem with the software?
    Thanks. 

    The DSL Connection rate shown by Speedtester has always been 1300-1800kbps, with a lower figure for the IP Profile.  If only the IP Profile and consequently download speed would sit consistently in that range I'd be very happy. 
    The frustrating thing is that for 6 months to March this year the download speed was steady day in, day out at about 1200kbps.  We're 5km from the exchange in rural Suffolk so anything over 1Mbps is good!  Since March it's oscillated widely, with a record low of 135kbps and a few maxima around 2Mbps, immediately following complaints to BT Broadband but then slowly declining again.
    Recent line tests followed by pair swaps MAY have got to the root cause of the problem.  Currently we've had a straight week at just under 1Mbps on the Thinkbroadband speed tester, but now these odd glitches in the BT tester results have appeared.  With BT refusing to look at any speed data other than that produced by their own tester you can sense how unhappy I am with a possible bug in their system!

  • Confusing Speedtest result

    ok, to cut a long story short our broadband has been fixed this week by a friendly engineer (that was not meant in a sarcastic way he WAS a very nice and helpful lad) he said our broadband should be capable of doing up to 18Mb according to what the instruments said. we thought whoopee cool!
    anyway he mentioned it'll take a few days to settle in, which was not a problem for us. that was this week on Monday.
    the DL speed was approx 14Mb until Tuesday night then it suddenly dropped down to 3.5Mb and stayed that way. the upstream was 0.5Mb around that time.
    i kept checking the speed with speedtester.net which works faster and is actually quite precise. ok you don't get the extra info but i wasn't bothered by it.
    the daily check told me that the downstream stayed low on 3.5Mb but the upstream suddenly increased and is now around 0.9Mb.
    so i thought it was time to give the bt speedtest another whirl today and the result is somehow mindboggling odd.
    i have to add the router is now running without any interruption since tuesday.
    Test1 comprises of two tests
    1. Best Effort Test: -provides background information.
        Download Speed
        3018 Kbps
    0 Kbps    4000 Kbps
    Max Achievable Speed
     Download speedachieved during the test was - 3018 Kbps
     For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 1200-4000 Kbps.
     Additional Information:
     Your DSL Connection Rate :18560 Kbps(DOWN-STREAM), 1144 Kbps(UP-STREAM)
     IP Profile for your line is - 3500 Kbps
    The throughput of Best Efforts (BE) classes achieved during the test is - 3.57:13.68:82.76 (SBE:NBEBE)
    These figures represent the ratio while sententiously passing Sub BE, Normal BE and Priority BE marked traffic.
    The results of this test will vary depending on the way your ISP has decided to use these traffic classes.
    2. Upstream Test: -provides background information.
        Upload Speed
        921 Kbps
    0 Kbps    1144 Kbps
    Max Achievable Speed
    >Upload speed achieved during the test was - 921 Kbps
     Additional Information:
     Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 1144 Kbps
    so my question is why aren't i getting the speed the DSL Connection Rate claims i should have and the engineer said was easily possible.
    it's like someone left the handbreak on for the downstream, whereas we never had such a cracking good upstream.
    can someone give our downstream a gently nudge to wake it up please!
    do i have to wait longer or should i ring up on Monday??

    looking at btspeedtester results your profile is only 3500 which is why your download speed is so low for your 18mb connection.  Did you notice before the drop in download speed if your router reset a few times in quick succession as that could be enough with 21CN aggressive nature on noise to drop your profile.
    what is your connection time from the router?  is it staying connected now 24/7?
    it may help if you posted the adsl stats from your router and someone may be able to offer help/suggestions to get your profile back to normal
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Inconsistent MRP results

    Dear Sir / Madam
    Our users are continuously complaining that the MRP results are inconsistent. We are using MD61 transaction for entering Planned Independant Requirements. Planning run is executed using 1 3 1 3 1 parameters in md01. We are using multi level BOMs. Backflush indicator 1. Strategy group for BOM components is 40. Strategy group 11 is used for FG.
    KIndly suggest how to get consistent MRP results.
    Thanks in advance.

    Dear Sagar ,
    I would like to comment on the same issue that MRP  is one of the most  high level functionality in SAP specially in supply chain  , which is intregarted with core module like MM-SD-PP-PS-FICO etc .
    There are two different aspect which one should be very much aware about MRP : Excution of MRP  based on business requirement based on Demand situation  and Analysing the MRP result for decision making  as a planner ( Why did it happen -What needs to be done ) .There are bvarious exception messages MRP generates in MD04-Dyanamic result which indicates the reason and needs farther investigation to conclude on the result .
    Now in your case , as you have mentioned some of the activity . I would suggest the following :
    1.Re-check the MRP excution parameters selection  in MD01/MD02/MD03  ( Processing Key -NETCH , Create PR-2 OR 1 , MRP List -3 , Scheudle Line -3 , Planning Mode -1 for frist time , 3-Delete and re-create  )
    2.Check all the MRP1-MRP4 parameters .Specially for depedent compoenets , you must have BOM explosion and selection methods  is important and OPPQ-Carry all over all plant parameters -BOM explosion is very important .
    3.If you delete planned order , then open demand or current demand will be treated in MRP  and it will generate planned order based on the planning horzon or Process key seletion .
    4.Finally , it needs extensive training and understanding for user level to have clarity on MRP concept .
    Hope its helps
    Reagrds
    JH

  • Inconsistent SELECT results in PL/SQL package

    Inside an Oracle package, I populate variables with "SELECT ... INTO ... FROM <table name> WHERE ...;"
    Should be straightforward, but I have found it inconsistent. Sometimes the variables are not populated, sometimes they are (using the same WHERE). Any possible reasons for this behavior?
    Edited by: user12236430 on Jan 31, 2012 5:46 AM

    user12236430 wrote:
    I'll bring a snippet home from the office with me. It doesn't throw the NO_DATA_FOUND exception, because one of the variables it (sometimes) populates is used in an INSERT later, and when it's not set I get a "Precision Error occurred" exception. It's straightforward PL/SQL as best I can tell, but I'll update with actual code later today.Could the select be reading NULL values?

  • Inconsistent SQL results when using View with UNION-ALL and table function

    Can any of you please execute the below scripts and check the output. In the table type variable, I am adding 4 distinct object ids, where as in the result, I get only the row pertaining to last id in the table type variable. Same row is returned 4 times (4= number of values in the table type).
    This scenario is occurring in our product with a SQL with exactly same pattern. I could simulate the same issue with the sample script I have provided.
    Database version: 11.2.0.3 Enterprise Edition, Single node
    Thank you.
    CREATE TABLE TEMP_T1 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
    CREATE TABLE TEMP_T2 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
    UPDATE TEMP_T2 SET OBJECT_ID = OBJECT_ID * 37;
    CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T1_U1 ON TEMP_T1(OBJECT_ID);
    CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T2_U1 ON TEMP_T2(OBJECT_ID);
    CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW TEMP_T1T2_V AS
    SELECT * FROM TEMP_T1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM TEMP_T2;
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TYPE AS OBJECT (OBJ_ID NUMBER);
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_OBJ_TYPE;
    SET SERVEROUTPUT ON;
    DECLARE
    TYPE TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_T1T2_V%ROWTYPE;
    TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE;
    TEMP_OBJ_TAB TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE := TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE();
    PROCEDURE ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(OBJ_ID IN NUMBER) IS
    BEGIN
    TEMP_OBJ_TAB.EXTEND;
    TEMP_OBJ_TAB(TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST) := TEMP_OBJ_TYPE(OBJ_ID);
    END;
    BEGIN
    ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(100);
    ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(116);
    ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(279);
    ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(364);
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('=====================');
    FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
    LOOP
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
    END LOOP;
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
    SELECT * BULK COLLECT INTO TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB
    FROM TEMP_T1T2_V VW
    WHERE ((VW.OBJECT_ID) IN (SELECT OBJ_ID
    FROM TABLE(CAST(TEMP_OBJ_TAB AS TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE))));
    FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
    LOOP
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
    END LOOP;
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
    IF TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.COUNT > 0 THEN
    FOR I IN TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.LAST
    LOOP
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_ID||' : '||TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_NAME);
    END LOOP;
    ELSE
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('NO ROWS RETURNED!');
    END IF;
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
    END;
    /

    I can reproduce it:
    SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.3.0 Production on Tue Oct 30 14:05:39 2012
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2011, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
    Enter user-name: scott
    Enter password:
    Connected to:
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
    SQL> select  *
      2    from  v$version
      3  /
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
    CORE    11.2.0.3.0      Production
    TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
    SQL> CREATE TABLE TEMP_T1 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
    Table created.
    SQL>
    SQL> CREATE TABLE TEMP_T2 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
    Table created.
    SQL>
    SQL> UPDATE TEMP_T2 SET OBJECT_ID = OBJECT_ID * 37;
    72883 rows updated.
    SQL>
    SQL> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T1_U1 ON TEMP_T1(OBJECT_ID);
    Index created.
    SQL>
    SQL> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T2_U1 ON TEMP_T2(OBJECT_ID);
    Index created.
    SQL>
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW TEMP_T1T2_V AS
      2  SELECT * FROM TEMP_T1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM TEMP_T2;
    View created.
    SQL>
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TYPE AS OBJECT (OBJ_ID NUMBER)
      2  /
    Type created.
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_OBJ_TYPE
      2  /
    Type created.
    SQL> SET SERVEROUTPUT ON;
    SQL>
    SQL> DECLARE
      2  TYPE TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_T1T2_V%ROWTYPE;
      3  TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE;
      4  TEMP_OBJ_TAB TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE := TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE();
      5  PROCEDURE ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(OBJ_ID IN NUMBER) IS
      6  BEGIN
      7  TEMP_OBJ_TAB.EXTEND;
      8  TEMP_OBJ_TAB(TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST) := TEMP_OBJ_TYPE(OBJ_ID);
      9  END;
    10  BEGIN
    11  ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(100);
    12  ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(116);
    13  ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(279);
    14  ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(364);
    15  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('=====================');
    16  FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
    17  LOOP
    18  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
    19  END LOOP;
    20  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
    21  SELECT * BULK COLLECT INTO TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB
    22  FROM TEMP_T1T2_V VW
    23  WHERE ((VW.OBJECT_ID) IN (SELECT OBJ_ID
    24  FROM TABLE(CAST(TEMP_OBJ_TAB AS TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE))));
    25  FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
    26  LOOP
    27  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
    28  END LOOP;
    29  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
    30  IF TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.COUNT > 0 THEN
    31  FOR I IN TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.LAST
    32  LOOP
    33  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_ID||' : '||TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_NAME);
    34  END LOOP;
    35  ELSE
    36  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('NO ROWS RETURNED!');
    37  END IF;
    38  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
    39  END;
    40  /
    =====================
    OBJ_ID = 100
    OBJ_ID = 116
    OBJ_ID = 279
    OBJ_ID = 364
    OBJ_ID = 100
    OBJ_ID = 116
    OBJ_ID = 279
    OBJ_ID = 364
    364 : I_AUDIT
    364 : I_AUDIT
    364 : I_AUDIT
    364 : I_AUDIT
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> column object_name format a30
    SQL> select  object_id,
      2          object_name
      3    from  dba_objects
      4    where object_id in (100,116,279,364)
      5  /
    OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME
           100 ORA$BASE
           116 DUAL
           279 MAP_OBJECT
           364 I_AUDIT
    SQL>  Works fine in:
    =====================
    OBJ_ID = 100
    OBJ_ID = 116
    OBJ_ID = 279
    OBJ_ID = 364
    OBJ_ID = 100
    OBJ_ID = 116
    OBJ_ID = 279
    OBJ_ID = 364
    100 : ORA$BASE
    116 : DUAL
    364 : SYSTEM_PRIVILEGE_MAP
    279 : MAP_OBJECT
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> select  object_id,
      2          object_name
      3    from  dba_objects
      4    where object_id in (100,116,279,364)
      5  /
    OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME
          100 ORA$BASE
          116 DUAL
          364 SYSTEM_PRIVILEGE_MAP
          279 MAP_OBJECT
    SQL> select  *
      2    from  v$version
      3  /
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    CORE    11.2.0.1.0      Production
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    SQL>SY.
    Edited by: Solomon Yakobson on Oct 30, 2012 2:14 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to use third party software

    I have downloaded the Real Guitar demo to try out with Logic. I have never used sounds other than those that came with Logic. How do I set up Real Guitar so that I can use those sounds in Logic? Thanks.

  • "save as" won´t work

    please help just downloaded the free trial of photoshop cs6 but the save as button doesn´t work everything else does.

  • Oracle Streams and Oracle Apps  11i

    Hi, I am looking for an oracle solution to build a reporting instance off an e-business suite 11i and offload discoverer reporting to the reporting instance. I have tried dataguard logical standby but too many issues and I cannot use. I am wondering

  • Urgent : Smartforms: Direct printing from module pool/dialog screen

    Hi all, i have a module pool screen where in from a screen i have some inputs from the user and after saving user wud click on a button called print which shud print a slip containing the screen data.now for this purpose i have made a smartform which

  • Logic Pro 9 unable to open & downloads files at first launch

    Hi everyone, I've just downgraded from Mountain Lion to Snow Leopard and re-installing all my programms. I'm having trouble while downloading Logic which i bought from the Mac App Store. The programm well go through the install procedure but i'm unab