Increase load time to BPM Community

All
I developed a process using ALBPM 6.0 MP3 and deployed the project on to the ALUI portal. When I go to the BPM community, the page takes a while to load. I have increased the instance size to 2MB. Is there anything else that I should check?
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

All
I developed a process using ALBPM 6.0 MP3 and deployed the project on to the ALUI portal. When I go to the BPM community, the page takes a while to load. I have increased the instance size to 2MB. Is there anything else that I should check?
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

Similar Messages

  • How to increase load time for mobile client platform on handhelds?

    Hello Experts!
    I have developed an application for my mobile client on handheld, but i have a problem with performance, my problem is on load of client, elapsed time to load this ambient is 25 seconds, somebody have a solution to increase a performance to load Mobile client on handhelds?
    Regards
    Ronaldo Rampelotti.

    I was given this a long time ago back when I was developing on SP3
    Not sure if they are all valid or more have been added.
    I thought I posted this awhile ago, but can't find it maybe it got deleted.
    These CSS properties are ALL or NONE, you cannot specify by View or by some class id.
    I think there are suppose to be improvements in next version of MI client.
    Name of the property     
    default     
         stylesheet.default.backgroundcolor
         stylesheet.default.foreground
         stylesheet.default.font.name
         stylesheet.default.font.size
         stylesheet.default.height
         stylesheet.default.bordercolor
    brandingarea     
         stylesheet.brandingarea.backgroundcolor
         stylesheet.brandingarea.bordercolor
         stylesheet.brandingarea.font.size
         stylesheet.brandingarea.foreground
         stylesheet.brandingarea.height
         stylesheet.brandingarea.brandingtext
    button     
         stylesheet.button.backgroundcolor
         stylesheet.button.font.size
         stylesheet.button.foreground
         stylesheet.button.height
    label     
         stylesheet.label.backgroundcolor
         stylesheet.label.font.size
         stylesheet.label.foreground
         stylesheet.label.height
    caption     
         stylesheet.caption.backgroundcolor
         stylesheet.caption.font.size
         stylesheet.caption.foreground
         stylesheet.caption.height
    inputfield     
         stylesheet.inputfield.backgroundcolor
         stylesheet.inputfield.font.size
         stylesheet.inputfield.foreground
    radionbutton     
         stylesheet.radiobutton.radiobutton
    linktoaction     
         stylesheet.linktoaction.backgroundcolor
         stylesheet.linktoaction.font.size
         stylesheet.linktoaction.foreground
         stylesheet.linktoaction.height
    statusbar     
         stylesheet.status.backgroundcolor
         stylesheet.status.errorcolor
         stylesheet.status.messagecolor
         stylesheet.status.warningcolor
    table     
         header
         stylesheet.table.header.backgroundcol
         stylesheet.table.header.foreground
         stylesheet.table.header.height
         stylesheet.table.header.font.size
         content
         stylesheet.table.content.backgroundcolor
         stylesheet.table.content.foreground
         stylesheet.table.content.height
         stylesheet.table.content.font.size
         footer
         stylesheet.table.footer.backgroundcolor
         stylesheet.table.footer.foreground
         stylesheet.table.footer.height
         stylesheet.table.footer.font.size
    imagebutton     
         stylesheet.imagebutton.backgroundcolor
         stylesheet.imagebutton.font.size
         stylesheet.imagebutton.foreground
    image     
         stylesheet.image.backgroundcolor
    I don't know about the client arguments, usually that was a guess\try and find out.

  • Increasing loading time

    im a student at uni and doing java - i hope i pass this year just like the last year
    anyway
    we use a program at uni that was made by the Java dept. its a UML program for OO.
    problem is - im making it so it can run off a CD with the JDK on the CD along with this program.
    is there a faster way of:
    1) loading this program? I have basically told my own code to copy this program to the HDD in a temp folder and run it - it needs JDK files or SDK files so it grabs it from the CD since i set the paths like that
    2) how can i make compiling faster? (since its running from a CD) i know that the first time u compile it can take a while but when u compile again it does it within about 4 seconds.
    I know nothing is faster than your HDD compared to CD but thought there maybe a way of increasing speed of loading and compiling.
    Thanks

    1) Can you not just stick a copy of the JDK on the CD, stuff the .class files in the /bin directory, then make a batch file that runs java.exe in there?
    2) Why would you be compiling the version on the CD? Surely the idea is you've already compiled it and just need to run the interpreter on your bytecode? There are various compilers that let you make platform-specific .exe files, which might be what you want, although they're not particularly efficient or fast, and negate the advantages of java.

  • SLOW LOADING TIME TO HOME MENU SCREEN

    I've started to noticed increased loading time to my home menu screen whenever I'm using any application. This occurs even when I'm in the Contacts app, SMS app, or any 3rd-party app. Previously before I began to experience this slow lag time, the home menu screen would pop up as soon as I hit the home button. I did a hard reset (Erased All Content and Settings) and the problems still occurs even before I re-installed all of my applications. Anyone else experience this? I do hope the upcoming bug software fix will remedy this annoying problem, along with the lag time in the Contacts app.

    Sorry I tried to delete the other duplicate post prior to posting this one. I wasn't able to. The other posting was deleted. I'm not able to view the response. Can anyone please respond to this posting?

  • Increase Adf Application Load Time

    We have identified that ADF application is taking very long time to load at very first time , it is taking time to load the images,css and java script files ..
    only after all these resources are downloaded, then it is starting to load the page..
    Is there a way to load the page (displaying content on browser) in spite of waiting complete dom is ready. (domConetntLoaded).?
    Is there any why to increase the page load time.?

    User, tell us your jdev version, please!
    The framework loads some content up front, which takes time. There are some techniques you can use to reduce this time like http://www.ateam-oracle.com/improving-adf-page-rendering-time/
    or resource losing servlet which can cache calls and deliver images or other stuff faster.
    Timo

  • Sudden increase in webpage loading time

    I´ve had a Mac Mini (1 Gig of RAM) for over three years. It´s connected to a router Zyxel Prestige 660HW-61 via Ethernet. My internet connection is 3 Mbps down. Web surfing has been fine until last week when I noticed a sudden and dramatic increase in the time web pages took to load, to the extent that they fail to load more often than not.
    When browsing threads for possible causes, I found this one: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2059511&start=0&tstart=0
    As suggested by Boece, I restarted my Mini and run nothing but Safari (4.x) and Activity Monitor to watch the outs-to-ins ratio while Safari tried to load a page. Page outs remained at 0% for the duration of the test (around 40 minutes testing sites such as IMDB and Youtube and running a few google searches)
    Next I installed Firefox (3.5) and Camino and run the same test to see how my DNS setup performed. Page outs remained at 0% again and page-loading time was painfully slow with the new browsers.
    Time to switch over to OpenDNS. I installed the OpenDNS domain name servers in both the router and the Mini instead of those provided by my ISP, restarted the Mini and run the same tests with Safari, Firefox and Camino. Unfortunately, I didn´t notice any improvements at all.
    I´m not aware of any anti-virus or malicious-website protection software installed on the Mini or in the browsers.
    I don´t have MS Office installed and only one Dashboard widget (iStats Pro)
    Web surfing is fine with my Dell laptop and donwload speeds with the Mini, though I´ve been unable to test them via websites (pages failed to load), seem fine after having downloaded a few bittorrent files using Transmission.
    Whatever the problem, it also applies, perhaps not surprisingly, to MacTubes. It fails to both play and download youtube videos.
    Any other suggestions? Thanks in advance for your help.

    I´ve had a Mac Mini (1 Gig of RAM) for over three years. It´s connected to a router Zyxel Prestige 660HW-61 via Ethernet. My internet connection is 3 Mbps down. Web surfing has been fine until last week when I noticed a sudden and dramatic increase in the time web pages took to load, to the extent that they fail to load more often than not.
    When browsing threads for possible causes, I found this one: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2059511&start=0&tstart=0
    As suggested by Boece, I restarted my Mini and run nothing but Safari (4.x) and Activity Monitor to watch the outs-to-ins ratio while Safari tried to load a page. Page outs remained at 0% for the duration of the test (around 40 minutes testing sites such as IMDB and Youtube and running a few google searches)
    Next I installed Firefox (3.5) and Camino and run the same test to see how my DNS setup performed. Page outs remained at 0% again and page-loading time was painfully slow with the new browsers.
    Time to switch over to OpenDNS. I installed the OpenDNS domain name servers in both the router and the Mini instead of those provided by my ISP, restarted the Mini and run the same tests with Safari, Firefox and Camino. Unfortunately, I didn´t notice any improvements at all.
    I´m not aware of any anti-virus or malicious-website protection software installed on the Mini or in the browsers.
    I don´t have MS Office installed and only one Dashboard widget (iStats Pro)
    Web surfing is fine with my Dell laptop and donwload speeds with the Mini, though I´ve been unable to test them via websites (pages failed to load), seem fine after having downloaded a few bittorrent files using Transmission.
    Whatever the problem, it also applies, perhaps not surprisingly, to MacTubes. It fails to both play and download youtube videos.
    Any other suggestions? Thanks in advance for your help.

  • Mail has 16k  messages, and performance is very slow, with loading times taking up to 5 seconds every time I open Mail. How can I increase performance?

    Mail has 16k  messages, and performance is very slow, with loading times taking up to 5 seconds every time I open Mail.
    How can I increase performance?
    I'm running a MacBook Air 4GB 1.7GHz  10.7.2.
    Graham

    One possible solution would be to organise your inbox into folders.
    Its never relly good on any system to have one folder that has everything in it.
    Try going to you web gui for that mail account and organise your folders and move mails from your inbox into corresponding folders for better organisation.
    Several folders containing the same amount of one folder will usually load a little quicker as the folder may not be accessed to download its content unless veiwed.
    So having 10 folders with organised content, and you inbox as an area thats to hold only new emails would work much much quicker with imap.
    Most imap servers will only update the contents of a folder when its veiwed.

  • Increase in Loading time for LV search in 2011

    Initially when I loaded LV2011 my quick drop and the search took nearly 5 seconds but now it takes nearly 20 seconds to load so is there any reason for this kind of performance. Also I don't have anyother big software loaded or running in my PC. I have added few toolkits from VI package manager may be that is the reason?.
    The best solution is the one you find it by yourself

    RavensFan wrote:
    In my message in the other thread, I commented that I thought 20 seconds wasn't all that long.  But I thought you were commenting on the loading time for LabVIEW itself.  That does seem like a long time for any of the internal LabVIEW dialogs to come up.
    (Actually, I find several internal dialogs seem to take longer to load the first time then they should including the properties dialog.  But not 20 seconds long.)
    Hopefully, with this message thread in the LabVIEW forum, others can comment and offer suggestions on how to determine what the issue your having is.
    Yes now I have plenty of toolkits ( Thanks for spotting me in the other thread )
    Jeff you hit the bullseye. The loading was set as Load palette when needed.
    Thanks
    The best solution is the one you find it by yourself

  • Slow BIOS load times

    Hello, I own a T420i and have been experiencing very slow load times on startup.  The "ThinkPad" BIOS screen stays active for roughly 5-10min before continuing like normal.  Once operational the computer works fine other then an occasional freeze up (which becomes extremely annoying with a boot time of 10 min).
    Thanks for any suggestions.

    Hi Epitome, welcome to the forums,
    do you have any external devices, especiall USB storage, attached to the system when booting?  If so please detach them to see if you experience the same problem.
    If the system boots normally please exclude the USB devices from the boot order in BIOS; the system may be scanning them for boot information before moving on to start from the main hard drive.
    Andy  ______________________________________
    Please remember to come back and mark the post that you feel solved your question as the solution, it earns the member + points
    Did you find a post helpfull? You can thank the member by clicking on the star to the left awarding them Kudos Please add your type, model number and OS to your signature, it helps to help you. Forum Search Option T430 2347-G7U W8 x64, Yoga 10 HD+, Tablet 1838-2BG, T61p 6460-67G W7 x64, T43p 2668-G2G XP, T23 2647-9LG XP, plus a few more. FYI Unsolicited Personal Messages will be ignored.
      Deutsche Community     Comunidad en Español    English Community Русскоязычное Сообщество
    PepperonI blog 

  • Improving load times in Linux LabVIEW executable

    I'm looking for (simple) ways to improve the loading times in a Linux LabVIEW executable. We're using a low performance, low cost CPU board, and loading times are terrible. The CPU is capable of doing everything after the application is loaded, but takes forever to get there.
    One of the problems is the size of the executable, that grows everytime you just look at it. Are there ways to create smaller executables? It runs from a Compact Flash card, which is ofcourse much slower than hard disk.
    Another problem is a dynamic vi, that is started for every TCP connection that connects to the application. It takes a long time to load, and connecting too fast can even effectively hang up the system. Starting a handler task takes about half a second, up to a few seconds for the first task.
    We're using the LabVIEW 7.1 runtime, system is a 300 MHz cyrix SBC, running from a Compact Flash.

    Dennisvr wrote:
    I'm looking for
    (simple) ways to improve the loading times in a Linux LabVIEW
    executable. We're using a low performance, low cost CPU board, and
    loading times are terrible. The CPU is capable of doing everything
    after the application is loaded, but takes forever to get there.   One
    of the problems is the size of the executable, that grows everytime you
    just look at it. Are there ways to create smaller executables? It runs
    from a Compact Flash card, which is ofcourse much slower than hard disk.   Another
    problem is a dynamic vi, that is started for every TCP connection that
    connects to the application. It takes a long time to load, and
    connecting too fast can even effectively hang up the system. Starting a
    handler task takes about half a second, up to a few seconds for the
    first task.   We're using the LabVIEW 7.1 runtime, system is a 300 MHz cyrix SBC, running from a Compact Flash.
    I'm
    not sure about the first part of your question. LabVIEW is highly
    binary and does a lot of memory allocations before even one VI is ready
    to be started. So maybe the memory manager is a problem. Another issue
    is that the Macintosh like resource file format that is used by LabVIEW to store its VIs etc. results in
    lots and lots of individual disk accesses with a rther random like
    character inside a single file. So if you can configure the read
    caching of your disk to use more memory this may significantly increase
    the speed of loading LabVIEW VIs or applications.
    And finally spawning VIs through VI server is a rather costly operation
    especially on low resoruce systems. A VI is more like an executable in
    many ways as far as resource consumption is concerned rather than a
    thread. A much better way would be to avoid spawning subVIs altogether
    and implement a queued TCP/IP server similar to the Date Time Server
    example. It is a little extra work to work with this shift register
    architecture but it will not have the issues of long load times for
    every new TCP/IP connection coming in.
    Rolf Kalbermatter
    Message Edited by rolfk on 03-07-2006 06:33 PM
    Rolf Kalbermatter
    CIT Engineering Netherlands
    a division of Test & Measurement Solutions

  • IE6, load times & pngs

    true or false: using pngs (specifically png-8's WITHOUT alpha
    transparency,
    but with gif-style 1-bit transparency) adds load time to a
    page versus a
    comparable transparent gif of the same file size.
    I have been told this is causing some latency and it doesn't
    seem correct to
    me. Are there any reliable articles out there that can speak
    to this? Anyone
    just know?
    Alex

    > true or false: using pngs (specifically png-8's WITHOUT
    alpha
    > transparency, but with gif-style 1-bit transparency)
    adds load time to a
    > page versus a comparable transparent gif of the same
    file size.
    False. Because the PNG file compression algorithm is more
    efficient than
    the GIF file's simplistic algorithm, an 8-bit PNG image will
    always be about
    10-15% smaller than the comparable GIF image, and perhaps
    more if the image
    contains vertical bands or textures. Also, comparing the
    render times for
    two images, of the identical weight, where one is GIF and the
    other is PNG,
    would show no difference.
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    ==================
    "Alexander Ross" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:firs1e$cju$[email protected]..
    > true or false: using pngs (specifically png-8's WITHOUT
    alpha
    > transparency, but with gif-style 1-bit transparency)
    adds load time to a
    > page versus a comparable transparent gif of the same
    file size.
    >
    > I have been told this is causing some latency and it
    doesn't seem correct
    > to me. Are there any reliable articles out there that
    can speak to this?
    > Anyone just know?
    >
    > Alex
    >

  • Data Load Times, etc.

    Hello Forums:
    I saw this website:
    http://www.s-w-h.com/index.php?language=en
    And found that a website like this loaded very quickly, and
    seemed to fit almost all resolution.
    I was wondering how did they make it fit dynamically? And how
    did they manage to reduce load times so significantly?
    I kinda wondered if it's possible to develop a massive forum
    or online community thing using purely Flash. Would that be
    possible? What if there were lots of user interaction, can the load
    times be significantly cut down?

    Does it load all the data while connected with 5GHz frequency…  What is the IP address that you are getting from the Router? You can check the IP address in the following manner:
    If you wish to find out your own IP address, you should run the same ms-dos prompt by clicking Start -> All Programs -> Accessories -> Command Prompt. A black pop up box should come up, type: "ipconfig /all" … There check the IP address and Default Gateway under LAN….
    # Open up the browser and on the address bar type “IP address of Default Gateway” that will open up the Router setup page…
    # In that page itself make the MTU size to 1400 from Auto….
    # Make the following Channel Settings of 2.4 GHz you can make Channel Width to 20 MHz only and Channel to 6, 9, 11.. Click Save Settings...
    Then check the connectivity…

  • The Power Supply Fan is still working, but does not appear to respond to increased loads, and its speed cannot be increased using SMCFanControl. Any suggestions?

    Hi all - My mac pro 1,1 has an enigmatic problem. It's quad-core, 3Ghz, running OS X 10.7.5. The problem began some months back, when running HD video conferences, HD streaming videos and some other graphics-moderate (I won't say intense) uses, such as slide shows in Just Looking. My machine has an ATY, RadeonX1900 card and 2 monitors - both Apple displays, one being 30 inch 2560x1600, the other being 24 inch 1920x1200.
    When I start those types of graphics-moderate apps, after about 5 minutes, something would crash (the monitors making a noise as it did) and the displays would both go black. The power did not appear to be fully cut off from the monitors. I think that the underlying applications, however, did not crash. So, I could still hear and speak to people during video conferences, and I could hear the sound tracks of videos.
    Attempts to restart the computer and get the monitors back did not immediately work to undo the problem, if done straight away. The only way to correct the problem (so as to have the monitors work) was to wait for a few minutes and then restart.
    After a lot of puzzled looking at console logs (and I confess that I am not an expert), I ran into a blank.
    But, because of the timing of the crashes (after ~5minutes use) and restarts (after some minutes wait), I reasoned that the problem might be temperature related.
    Once on that path of thought, I found this article:
    http://worldtv.com/blog/guides_tutorials/fixing_an_overheating_mac_pro_no_expens e_required.php
    I installed both Temperature Monitor and SMCFanControl. And I experimented, and got interesting results:
    Now to the puzzling bit: SMCFanControl shows that the speed of the Power Supply Fan doesn't vary much, even if I use SMCFanControl to ramp fan speeds right up. All of the other fans react to SMCFanControl, going up to and above 2500rpm when commanded. But the Power Supply Fan does not.  Having watched it for a few days now, the Power Supply Fan, according to AFCFanControl, never varies outside of a range from about 600-640 rpm, regardless of what I do with AFCFanControl.
    Also (and not surprisingly), whenever the graphics-moderate apps run, when I ramp all the fan speeds up using SMCFanControl, Temperature Monitor shows that the all of the temperatures within the machine plummet, except in the power supply locations. Power Supply Location 2 is the worst affected. Because the Power Supply Fan does not react as the other fans do, the "crashes" still occur.
    I could post some screen shots of the read outs of SMCFanControl and Temperature Monitor, although I think I have covered the key points in this post.
    It seems that the Power Supply Fan is still working, but does not respond to increased loads.
    Instinctively, I'm worried that if that's right, it might be a hard problem to fix. Any suggestions? Help! I would really appreciate them!
    Cheers
    P

    Thanks for your response Grant. I had already read about, and I think excluded, dust in graphics card/fan/assembly as a cause. The entire inside of the computer, including the graphics card/fan/assembly, is as clean as a whistle. It looks clean. I've cleaned the dust out every now and then (including a few days ago). Also, my undersanding (derived from the article, linked in my first post) is that I might expect to see high temperatures in the Northbridge and memory module B if the graphics card was overheating. According to Temperature Monitor, however, locations do not increase in temperature when I run the relevant apps. Finally, the graphics card/assembly does not feel too hot to touch.
    It is strange that SMCFanControl lists the Power Supply Fan as being software controllable, if that fan is not. Still, your comments are consistent with my observations, as the fan simply does not respond to software control.
    There are two upsides: First, I've something of a work-around. I've worked out what temperature must be achieved in Power Supply Location 2 for a crash to occur, and I can watch that location in Temperature Monitor, terminating the process before that treshold is reached. Of course, that's not ideal. Second, ramping all the other fans up does significantly delay the onset of the problem, and makes recovery time much quicker.
    Is there any donwside to peridically ramping up the other fans when running the relevant apps? Given that it causes all of the other locations to cool significantly, could this lessesn the life expecancy of the mahcine? (I don't want to run the fans up all the time - that's like sitting next to a jet ready for take off!)
    Also, a correction to my first post: Yesterday, with all the other fans running on full and running an HD streaming video, the Power Supply Fan did, eventually, slowly, come up to ~740rpm, which is much higher than the ~640rpm maximum I had previously seen, and this may have aided delaying the onset of the problem. 
    I'm not sure where this leaves me? The problem might now be able managed. Well, sort-of. But it's not eliminated.

  • Reducing a SWF file size / creating "instance names" for website loading time improvement

    Im hoping someone clever can help...
    What i have done so far:
    1) Created a flipbook using indesign CS5.5 that contains approx 25
    images (embedded PNG's), these need to be good quality as this is a
    portfolio - I'd also like to keep the 'page curl' effect. This makes the SWF generated cira 25MB.
    2) created a Flash website "wrapper" to hold the above flipbook and add
    features such as "bookmarks", links to other sites and forward/backward
    page navigation buttions.
    The issue we have is that because the flipbook SWF is 25MB the site
    load time is slow.
    What can be done to speed this up without compromising the image
    quality?
    1) Is there a way to make the indesign SWF smaller?
    2) is there a way in indesign to properly give each page an
    "instance name" so that they can be controlled from flash and therefore
    I can load each pages image as and when needed.
    any other ideas?
    (If you'd like to visit the website to view the loading issue http://www.lizblackdesigns.co.uk)
    Thanks
    Liz

    these need to be good quality as this is a portfolio
    The approach to your portfolio website seems very outdated and will not help you in the near future. Flash is being used less and less with the increase in Mobile Devices being used to access the internet - a large chunk of which include Apple's iDevices which don't support Flash. This alone is a reason not to do it, however there are a few other big issues with the method you have chosen.
    There is no "content" on your website for any search engine to find. No text. No meta data. No image alt tags. No titles. Nothing. In other words, your website will not be found by the people you are trying to attract. I would imagine for a portfolio site, you may want to re-think this approach.
    The way the Flash file was created is the worst possible way to add Flash to the web as you have only embedded image files - and this is your entire site?! You could have included some text, which would have been viewable by search engines, and used color shapes to increase quality but lower filesize.
    The filesize meant it took me over 1 minute to get off your home page. The average internet user will leave your site if you do not keep them interested after 5 seconds. In other words, you should have content of interest viewable within 5 seconds of load time.
    If you are set on keeping the Flash setup for your website, re-build using as much text, color shapes and lines as you can (vector work in other words) and do not rasterize/export as image. This will drastically reduce load time and increase quality. You will also want to divide your file into sections and create more than 1 HTML page so that the browser only loads a bit at a time. You might also want to set a maximum size container for the Flash file as on my browser, it looks extremely pixelated and is very large, but unclear.
    I would suggest looking into HTML5 if you are keen to create a website that can be viewed by around 98% of the web surfing people and it will also mean you can use an image slider (or similar) to show good quality images of your work. This will aid your site in being found by search engines but will also allow you to update sections of the site without re-publishing the entire Flash file.
    Rik

  • Dealing with a lot of images....Thinking about load time

    I am designing a web site that has roughly 30 unique images per page.  Each page has a photo gallery which swaps images in the main content area.  Also, there are some other miscellaneous graphics that are reused on each page.
    1) Should I create an images folder for each page or is there downside to having 200+ images in one folder? 
    2) Is there a way to see the size of a page (in mega bytes) and get a feel for the load time?
    Thanks!
    Gary

    If it were me, I would create a new folder for each of the pages that have your 30+ unique images - that way they are all organised by page,I find that if you ever need to change them they are filed in a logical way and easier to maintain.
    I would then have another folder containing all the images that will be used on all pages.  Like header, logo, background images etc.,
    Nancy has given you a link on how to best get a report on the file sizes used in your site.
    Nadia
    Adobe Community Expert : Dreamweaver
    Unique CSS Templates | Tutorials | SEO Articles
    http://www.DreamweaverResources.com
    Web Design & Development
    http://www.perrelink.com.au
    http://twitter.com/nadiap

Maybe you are looking for