Individual payement in F110

Hi, i am trying individual payement in F110.it means i want payment transaction by each open AP item instead total AP,everything is working fine execpt payment medium file,i download payment medium as txt file,but only one payment in txt file,but my payment list include 2 payments.
btw,i test one vender w/ 2 open items.
can someone advise,thanks

Hi Anit,
in OBPM3,i selected company code and house bank. does it means SAP will create payment medium data by company + house bank? because 2 payment transactions generated for one vendor in my case,so SAP create only one medium for one of those 2 payment transactions?and another payment transaction was ignored?
DMEE tree send to your email address, .appreciate your kind help.
regards
renhua

Similar Messages

Urgent requirment on PAYMENT Program

Hi,
I have a very Urgent requirement about Payments to customer using Payment program, I need to pay to customer for a over payment (he initially paid on invoice) now I need to pay back that type of customers, How it is done in Sap, if that can be done in using f110, if yes how it will differentiate the over payment-open item (here I dont want to pay credit notes automatically)
And one more question is if I need to list all the over payments in a forms and get it approved/ validated and trigger the payment run
Please throw some light on it is really urgent
Thanks
Sireesha

Hi Sireesha
Just enter the customer number(s) in the parameters of the payment program (F110). You can further define other selections such as document number(s) in the "Free Selections" tab.
You are able to include/exclude documents in the payment proposal log by blocking/unblocking individual lines (normal F110 functionality).
Kylie

Bank charges to be borne by payer and receiver equally - A/cing entry F110

Hello Gurus,
As per our client requirement bank charges need to be borne equally by the payer and the receiver, we want to know how the accounting entry gets reflected in SAP while doing a "Automatic Payment Program thru F110".
Assume that Vendor payment is 10050 and 100 are bank charges, which need to be borne by the payer and the receiver on agreed proportions.(Assumed at 50% in this example)
Entry for bank charges amount to be bifurcated in SAP as below.
Vendor a/cu2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026..10000u2026u2026u2026.Dru2026u2026..(Outgoing Payment)
Bank Charges a/c (With Vendor)u2026u2026u2026u202650u2026u2026u2026....Dru2026u2026 (Account Determination)
Bank Commission / Expense a/c (Self)u2026.50u2026u2026u2026u2026Dru2026u2026..(Account Determination)
Bank GL a/cu2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026.10100u2026u2026u2026Cru2026u2026..(Account Determination)
My concern is how the actual vendor invoice of 10050 will be cleared when 10000 is payed to the vendor. Appreciate your suggestions.

Hi,
As per my understanding accounting entry should be:
Vendor a/cu2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026..10050u2026u2026u2026.Dru2026u2026..(Outgoing Payment)
Bank Charges a/c (With Vendor)u2026u2026u2026u2026100u2026u2026u2026....Dru2026u2026 (Account Determination)
Bank Commission / Expense a/c (Self)u2026.50u2026u2026u2026u2026cru2026u2026..(Account Determination)
Bank GL a/cu2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026.10100u2026u2026u2026Cru2026u2026..(Account Determination)
From this it is clear that vendor is liable pay 50 rupeee to us.
Please check and Confirm.
Note: so through F110 we will charge 100 as bank charge and manually we have to pass a debit memo to respective vendors.
Thanks and Regards
Binoj M D

Automatic payement program error - F110

Hi,
I've implemented the automatic payement program and by mistake I forgot to set the number range for the payement document which is generated automatically by the automatic payement program. After I've finished the customizing, I tried to execute this program and I had an error about the number range for the payement document. After this no payement has been made.
Now I have a big problem with the documents that had to be payed with this program. Although they are not payed, now I can't pay them neither with F-53, nor with F110. They apear in the vendor's opened items and I can't see them in f-53 and f110.
Can anybody help me with this problem?
Thanks
Regards,
Sorin.

Hi,
Finaly I solved the problem. Because the number range interval (of the payment doc generated by F110) missed from the customisimg, my job has been interupted (after the error I made the nr range int in customising). After this, I didn't have any proposal, and I didn't see any invoices to pay in F110 any more. The problem was that the job has not been finished (was interupted).
So, I copied the job and restarted. This time the job worked ok.
Thanks.
Regards,
Sorin

F110 with Alternate Payer

Hi Experts,
When using the transaction F110 and the payer has an alternate payee the system is getting all the information as the address, city, region, etc from the alternative (causing problems because this information is being sent to the bank), is this the normal behavior if so, is there a way the system check or get this data from the original payer?
Thanks and Regards,

Please assign the alternative payee to Permitted payee field(Under Alternative payee in document). This way F110 will pick up the main vendor, unless you tell the system to pay to Permitted payee. You tell the system to pay to a different payee when you enter an invoice, here if you enter permitted payee in the PAYEE field of the line item, while you enter the main vendor in the vendor field. Then just for this invoice system will pick up the address details of the alternative / Permitted payee
Thanks
Ron

F110 payment postings individual invoices

Hi,
When executing the paymentrun (Direct debits), the payment program generates 1 payment posting (clearing document) per customer in which several open items/invoices are processed.
Now we want to have a payment document (clearing document) for each invoice, so no grouping on customer level.
So in case 1 customer has 3 invoices to be direct debited, we want to have 3 clearing documents.
Is it possible to set this up in the configuration?
I was not able to find it.
If not, is there a user-exit / BADI / BAPI we can use?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jurriaan

Hi
In Vendor/Customer Master Data, Under Automatic Payment transactions you will assign Payment method. under payment method there will be individual payment checkbox.
select this individual payment checkbox , 1 clearing document will be generated for each invoice ie seperate payment per invoice.
Regards
Venkat
Edited by: Venkat Dara on Jan 9, 2009 11:51 AM

Program RFFOF__V - Paiment - F110

Hi, i have a problem with the program RFFOF__V that i use in F110, when i launch , I have this message :
Program RFFOF__V: No records selected
     Message no. F0073
Diagnosis
     The system did not find any data to be processed in the payment dataset.
Procedure
     Check the selection criteria with which you started the payment medium
     program RFFOF__V and compare it with the payment list.
I have follow sap process but i have this message.
Thanks for your help.
Edited by: Spawn rad on Sep 3, 2008 3:24 PM

Hi,
Thanks for your reply. It's when i launch in the Tcode F110 that doesn't work.
In proposal i have this message:
>            Posting documents additional log
> Document F110000001 company code 1003 currency EUR payment method V
> LIt PK Acct         RA            Amount            Tax
>
> 001 25 0010000005               2.948,60              0,00
> 002 50 0051161000               2.948,60              0,00
>
End of log
Step 002 started (program SAPFPAYM_SCHEDULE, variant &0000000000004, user ID *****)
Step 003 started (program RFFOAVIS, variant &0000000000004, user ID *****)
Program RFFOAVIS: No records selected
Step 004 started (program RFFOF__V, variant &0000000000004, user ID ********)
Program RFFOF__V: No records selected
Job finished
In payment :
Job started
Step 001 started (program SAPFPAYM_SCHEDULE, variant &0000000000006, user ID ******)
Step 002 started (program RFFOAVIS, variant &0000000000006, user ID ******)
Program RFFOAVIS: No records selected
Step 003 started (program RFFOF__V, variant &0000000000006, user ID ******)
Program RFFOF__V: No records selected
Job finished

Error no permitted payer/payee defined - Message no. F5747

Hi
I am facing an issue while posting vendor invoice through FB60. The issue is as follows-
I have assigned Permitted payees in the general payment transaction screen in the vendor master data.
So When we post an invoice entry through FB60 then a field is available
during invoice entry on the Payment tab to select permitted payee. If we click F4, then a second screen appears that allows to select relevant permitted payees from multiple selection.
Here i am getting an error that No alternative payer/payee defined even though i have maintained it. We are using ECC 5.0 version.
Message no. F5747
Can anybody help me out on this.
With regards,
Shree.

Hi,
You have maintained alt payee for automatic payment run, not for specific document entry, hence if you run F110 you'll then see that alternative payee as the 'payment recipient' automatically.
If you want to do individual specifications upon FB60, you should assign it on the 'alt payee in docment'
Hope it helps, thnx
elvie

How to clear Vendor Debit item Through F110

Hi All,
I have a new requirement,
I have a vendor for which transactions are posted in multiple currecies, like USD & EUR.
I have 2 invoices for this vendor, one is in EUR, and other one is in USD, along with this i have a dabit balance for this vendor which generated through a credit note.
now when iam trying to make the payament for this Vendor thrugh F110, and try to clear the debit amount also, the system is throwing one error message saying that "Enter incoming payment method for the debit amount "(whici is in USD)
Please let me know how to solve this issue
Thanks in advance

Hi Robert,
This is the content of SAP Note 164835 as follows:
SAP Note 164835 - F110: Clearing credit memos and
invoices
Note Language: English Version: 14 Validity: Valid Since 29.05.2008
Summary
Symptom
When you execute a payment run, you select credit memos and invoices for a
customer or a vendor, but the system does not clear them together. In the
payment (default) log, the system may generate the error message FZ
347:"...none of the payment methods defined can be used for these items".
Other terms
F110, SAPF110S, clearing, FZ 347
Reason and Prerequisites
The items to be cleared do not match in particular fields (see below).
Therefore, they are not paid together.
You can set a payment method only for either outgoing or incoming payments.
This explains the error message FZ 347.
Example
- Payment run is executed with payment method U for outgoing
payment.
- Credit memo is not cleared against invoice.
- Invoice is paid with U.
- Error message FZ 347 is generated for the credit memo.
Solution
The following explains in general how to clear, and describes some options
for eliminating errors. The logic of the grouping in the payment program is
independent of the type of the documents (for example, invoice, credit
memo, down payment, cross-company code posting).
General information
o You can pay open items together using the automatic payment
transactions, but only if certain fields are identical. The
structure ZHLG1 specifies these fields. Important fields are:
- Currency
- Receiver
- Payment method in the item
- Bank details in the item
o Whenever invoices and credit memos are in different payment groups,
you cannot clear them together, even if the credit memo contains an
invoice reference. If you set a payment group for a business
27.12.2010 Page 2 of 4
SAP Note 164835 - F110: Clearing credit memos and
invoices
partner (grouping key in the master record), then this is saved in
structure ZHLG1 (field PAYGR). This way the invoice reference in
the credit memo is overridden if they do not belong to the same
payment group.
o Invoice and credit memo must be due at the date of clearing. The
due date of a credit memo without invoice reference (BSEG-REBZG) is
the baseline date for payment (BSEG-ZFBDT), and for a credit memo
with a fixed value date (BSEG-REBZG = 'V'), the due date is
calculated in the same way as for an invoice. For credit memos with
invoice reference, the due date of the invoice applies.
o You cannot clear credit memos and invoices if the payment is
supposed to be made using a payment method set for the POR
procedure.
Invoices are grouped with a POR number with the document number as
an additional part of the grouping key so as to save the individual
payment required for POR payment methods. Invoice-related credit
memos for invoices with POR numbers receive the same grouping key
as the related invoice. This ensures that the clearing is
performed. However, you can no longer make payments using the POR
payment method because this payment method allows only one item to
be paid. However, you can make the payment using a different
payment method.
The POR procedure is only relevant for payment transactions with
the Swiss Postal Service. Consequently, the relevant fields in the
document and in the business partner master record are only of
importance in Switzerland.
What can you do?
o Check the payment methods in the line items (field BSEG-ZLSCH). For
clearing, these must be filled with the same value.
o If you have entered a specific payment method for the items, then
check Customizing for this payment method (transaction FBZP). The
indicator "Single payment for marked item" should not be set there.
o Check the field "Grouping key" in the master record of the business
partner for payment transactions in the company code. If, for
example, there is a grouping set according to assignment number,
then the invoice and credit memo must have the same assignment
number in the business partner line for clearing. Using transaction
OBAP, you can define which fields of the key you want the system to
use for grouping.
o Check the indicator "Pay all items separately" (LFB1- or
KNB1-XPORE) in the master record of the business partner for
payment transactions in the company code. If this field is set,
each open item for this business partner is paid separately.
o If you have set the indicator "Separate payment for each Business
Area" (T042-XGBTR) for the payment program (all company codes) in
Customizing, check the business area in the items. They must match
in this case.
o Check the house bank in the line items (field BSEG-HBKID). The
27.12.2010 Page 3 of 4
SAP Note 164835 - F110: Clearing credit memos and
invoices
values must also match for clearing. A document without house bank
can only be cleared with a document with house bank if this house
bank is defined in the master record of the business partner
(LFB1-HBKID or KNB1-HBKID).
Make sure that the house bank from the payment program is filled
for any reset clearing documents (see Note 159607).
o Check the partner bank type in the line items (> Other data > field
BSEG-BVTYP). These values must also match for clearing. You can
specify the partner bank type in the master record of the business
partner for general payment transactions.
o For postings to one-time accounts, the address data is encoded and
saved in field BSEC-EMPFG. The coding routine has been changed in
Release 3.0E. Therefore, if you want to offset documents from an
earlier release against documents from a later release (for
example, after an upgrade) you need to check the contents of this
field. These values must match for clearing. If this is not the
case, the documents from the earlier release need to be reversed
and be posted again. If reversal is not possible, contact SAP
Support.
o If you do not clear using a payment method set with POR procedure
(with or without invoice reference in the credit memo), then check
the contents of the fields BSEG-ESRNR, BSEG-ESRRE and BSEG-ESRPZ.
They must not be filled if you do not enter a payment method in the
item.
o If you set a separate payment for each payment reference (for
example separated by a CID number in Norway or reference number in
Finland) (FBZP > Paying Company Codes > field T042B-XKIDS), then
the items for a clearing in field BSEG-KIDNO must be the same. Note
that the Customizing setting (T042B-XKIDS) is effective only if
vendors are involved in the payments. When you separate the
payments by payment reference, also take into account that no
outgoing payment can be generated for a payment reference for which
only credit memos exist.
o Check the structure ZHLG1 in your system. If you have inserted
additional fields there, the line items must also match in these
fields. Contact your consultant.
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 30.05.2008 10:55:56
Master Language: German
Priority: Recommendations/additional info
Category: Consulting
Primary Component: FI-AP-AP-B Payment Progam / Payment transfer
(DE, JP, US)
Secondary Components:
27.12.2010 Page 4 of 4
SAP Note 164835 - F110: Clearing credit memos and
invoices
RE-RT Rental
The Note is release-independent
Related Notes
Number Short Text
1084325 FSCM-BD: Payment method for invoice-related credit memo II
305414 F110: Unintelligible grouping of documents
197626 Partner bank category in RAs and payment program
159607 F110: Reset clearing is not offset against
143311 F110:Incorr.due date for cred.memo w/ fix.val.date
109233 F110: message FZ347 or several payment documents
86578 Guidelines for F110 Payment Program (W/Check mgmt)
33288 Payment methods for rental agreement
22856 Customer credit memos are not paid
20484 Payment program does not clear due items
4904 Credit memo clearing or down pmnt clearing for POR

F110 / APP - Docs. entered on 14.04.08 for 31.03.08 not getting cleared

Hi all,
We are facing a problem while clearing the Invoices / Documents " Entered "on or after 01.04.2008 with a " Posting " date on or before 31.03.2008.
If the invoice is already there i.e. " Posted / Entered " before 31.03.2008 then APP / F110 is picking the open items correctly. But if the item entered today (i.e. on 14.04.2008) with a posting date 31.03.2008 system is not considering that for payment.
Please suggest the ulternative as we are getting the error message "Company Codes ABC/ ABC do not appear in proposal 31.03.2008 6 ; correct" - Message No. FZ003.
a. I have confirmed that none of the past proposal is in incomplete mode for the subject Vendor which could had blocked the Vendor Line items from making the payment.
b. No question of Blocking of Invoice in Vendor line item
c. No question of Net due date
We can make the " Individual payment " through TCode - F- 53 in the same scenario. But our client want to use Tcode - F110 only for Multiple Vendor clearing.
Regards,
Shridhar Sawant
FICO

Hi
The date you fill in is documents entered up and not the posting or document date..
When you want to select on document date fill in documents entered up on today and use free selection and sellect there posting data 01.01.1900 to 31.03.2008
Paul

F110 - each item in each payment document for the same vendor

Hi Guru,
When i use F110 to do auto payment run for one vendor, each item is paid by each payment document although the document currency is the same, do you know why it appear like this, by right, all the vendor open items should be paid in one payment document, what is the possibility for this scenario, how to check it.
thanks,
Kick

There are things that you should check which may be causing this:
(1) In the vendor master (FK03) go to the section "Payment Transactions Accounting" and see whether the box "Individual Pmnt" has been selected. If it has, then deselect it.
(2) In transaction FBZP go to the "Payment Methods in Company Code" section, double click on the relevant payment method, and check whether the box "Single Payment for marked item" has been selected. If so, deselect it.

F110 Blocking all Invoices on a Vendor due to one Un-released PO.

Hi All,
We are implementing Vendor Downpayment functionality. I have done all the configuration and we did not activate the business object LOG_MMFI_P2P. We are just using the conventional Vendor Downpayment functionality. We get POs created from SRM. I am getting an error message when I am trying to run Payment run for a vendor for which I have created multiple PO's. Few PO's have Down Payment requests and few do not have. For one PO I created an invoice twice the amount of PO amount, so it went on unreleased status in SRM. Then when I ran the Payment run F110 for that vendor, the payment run is blocking all the other Invoices as well even though they are for different PO's.
Here is what I did
1) Created a PO for $100 from SRM
2) Created a Down Payment request of 50$ for that PO in F-47 and did not process the down payment. Now I processed MIGO for 100$, then created an invocie for 100$. Now i have created another invoice for $100 and posted that invoice. It went on payment block and i released the Payment block for that invoice in MRBR. Since the invoice amount is greater than PO amount in SRM the PO went on un released status and same in SAP as well.
3) Parallely I have created few other PO's and Invoices for the same vendor without any down payment requests.
4) Now when I ran F110 for this vendor, due to the unrelased status of one single PO, all other invoices are getting blocked in F110 run. I am not sure why is this happening, any help would be greatly appreciated.
The errors I am getting are
Purchasing document XXXX not yet released
Purchase order XXXXX (assigned to an account) not permitted
Information re. vendor XXXX/ paying company code XXX...
Message no. ME390
Message no. FZ356
Thanks,
Uday

Hi Ramesh,
Strange error..
anyways, you have option in Payment Tab to Individual Payment. This will consider each individual posting a separate payment.
Thanks,
Deepanshu

Automatic payment program (F110) document are not update in PAYR table

Hi all,
I have make payment in F110 (automatic payment) to customer
But it is not update in PAYR table
Please guide me what I have to do for documents update in PAYR table
Thanks and Regards,
Prudhvi

Hi,
It is possible to enter multiple documents.
You can enter a list of single documents or in intervals.
Enter the document number in ascending order.
Ex:
Individual documents.
10001,10003,10011
If the documents are in a sequence you can enter the Interval like this
(10001,10011)
Hope it helps you
Regards
Andrew
Edited by: Andrew J on May 28, 2009 4:26 PM

F110 Issue Split of Vendor line items in Clearing document

Hi SAP Gurus,
I have a strange problem with F110 payment programme when i am clearing the single vendor line items example 4 line items through F110 system is spliting 4 line items into 4 different clearing doucments rather than creating one clearing document and showing an error 098 in document payment list.
Can you please guide me in this issue
Regards
Srini

HI
This may happen because of any of the following settings:
1) in the vendor master, payment transaction company code area, "individual payment" check box is selected
2) "single payment for marked item" check box is selected in payment methos company code.
Deselect the check box for making single payment for multiple open item

Customer Hierarchy Partner determination in a Sales Order using Payer ?

Dear SD Experts/Gurus
We use Customer Hierarchies extensively in Sales Orders for Pricing & Rebates and it all works fine.
The Hierarchy structure consists at the bottom level of a SoldTo linked to a Hierarchy Customer and many SoldTos can have the same Hierarchy Customer.
We set price conditions at the Hierarchy Customer and that all works fine.
We would like to change our Customer Hierarchy to link the Hierarchy Customer to the Payer rather than to all the individual SoldTos.
This is because we have many SoldTos linked to 1 Payer and this will allow us to have simpler Customer Hierarchy structures making it easier to setup and maintain.
I have changed the SAP configuration to do this and I can certainly maintain the Customer Hierarchy without any problem using transaction VDH1N.
But when I create a Sales Order, the Hierarchy Customer does not get pulled through to the Sales Order Header Partners based on the Order Payer and hence no Hierarchy Customer price conditions are pulled through.
Is what I'm trying to do possible in SAP ?
If so please advise how this can be achieved.
Thanks David
Edited by: David Steele on Apr 15, 2008 1:57 PM

Hello,
I have a similar requirement, although we are building the hierarchies directly in CRM (as we are with BP's in general), and I am using hierarchy category 01 - PRICING.
What I have found is that a sold-to BP must:
1. be assigned to a hierarchy node
2. appear TWICE (!!!) in the document part.det.procedure, once in partner function 000001 (sold to) and again in partner function 00000121 (Authorized partner: sold to).
When the sold to customer exists in both functions within the document, I am able to determine the hierarchy node properly.
Now, my question is, can anyone guess why the main partner (sold to) must appear twice??? or, is this an error in my customizing?
Thank you in advance for your help, and I do hope my observation can help others find a solution.
Regards,
Allon
PS in terms of customizing, I used the following:
partner function 00000001 - sold to
partner function 00000121 - Auth. Partner: Sold-to Party
access for Auth. Partner: 0017 - current partner: sold to *this copies the sold to partner into this partner*
partner function 00000076 - Hierarchy Node Partner
access for hier.node partner: CRM_PARTNER_G Pricing hierarchy
The last bit presupposes that the hierarchy is set up using hierarchy category '01 - pricing'.
Message was edited by:
Allon Riczker - Added configuration steps

Individual payement in F110

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for