Insertion will increase memory usage

Hi,
I notice that whenever my application does an insert, oracle DB will increase its consumption. As described in numerous posts in the forum, the memory is not released after the operation stops. However, when the application calls the connection.close() method, memory consumed earlier on will be reclaimed.
I am wondering, if connection pooling is used (where connection is not disconnected but put back into the pool), the system will eventually run out of memory. Is this a correct assumption?
The scenario is observed in a server with the following specs:
Oracle DB: 9i Release 1
OS: Windows 2000 SP 4
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon 1.8Ghz
Ram: 1GB
As i am not a DBA, i am not sure of the values in PGA, SGA etc. The application uses Oracle JDBC Type 4 driver (ojdbc14.jar) to do the insertion via a prepared statement.
Please advice. Thanks.

Any insight is greatly appreciated :)

Similar Messages

Will passing object as parameter increase memory usage?

Hi,
Will passing an object as a parameter increase the mmory usage? will it affect the performance of the application any means. Please share your view.
Regards,
A.

Ananth.durai wrote:
Hi ,
Just to precise my question, suppose i have an object called Student.I want to pass the Student Object to a method called addStudent().Now rather than passing Student Object, i am passing it's super class "Object". (i.e)
addStudent(Object object) instead of addStudent(Student student)will it make any difference in performance?Those are declarations, not method passing. You'd still be passing the same thing, if it's just a question about how you declare the method.
And it will make no difference in performance, except when you start getting bugs. You might start getting bugs because you declared the parameter with a more general type than is really necessary. If the method takes a Student, then declare it as taking a Student. Making it say it takes an Object will just make things worse.
But as per Cogniac,
when you pass a parameter or use an accessor function (get() function) or something of that sort, it's actually just passing a pointer that points to the memory location of the Object you want, not actually passing the Object itself to you, nor is it instantiating a new instance of the Object for your use.if i pass Object itself instead of Student,which memory address it will point out?That question makes no sense. You pass what you pass. If it's a Student object, then the reference the method gets will point to that object, regardless of whether the method knows that it's a Student or just an Object generally.

High (and increasing) memory usage: Windows Driver Foundation

Hello! I updated my Z50-70 to Windows 10 a few days ago, using the clean install method. Everything works great but I noticed one problem. There is one process "Windows Driver Foundation - user-mode driver framework" which consumes great amounts of RAM. But the worrying thing is that when I start the computer that process doesn't use too much memory, but it keeps increasing, slowly but surely, and it doesn't seem to stop. I have done some research and apparently it could be caused by some faulty driver. Does anybody have the same problem? Is it any way to identify what is causing this problem? Thanks.

read this: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff550442(v=vs.85).aspx and this: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff557573(v=vs.85).aspx this will help you discover the driver with high usage or leakage.

As soon as Firefox opens, it starts increasing memory usage until it maxes out, and it won't actually close unless I end the process in the task manager.

Even if I'm not doing anything, no matter how few tabs I have open, Firefox will slowly increase in memory (RAM) usage until it's using nearly 100% of my computer's RAM, and everything basically freezes. Even when I close the window, the process continues to run, and I have to end the process in the task manager in order to get it to stop using RAM. I've tried disabling all my add-ons, and that does not help.

Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
*Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

Exchange 2013 issue with High memory Usage on Mailbox server post SP1 update.

So we have been chugging along fine since Feb 2 2014.
I performed a migration from 2010 from the UK to the US doing "incremental" mailbox moves. (get in contact with me if you want to know how. But we moved 400 Mailboxes averaging at 2gb a piece from the UK to the US, over the transcontinental link.
& then the weekend of the final, had everyone & everything done by the end of the cutover weekend)
Any woot.
So I applied the 2013 SP1 a few weeks back, & have intermitantly been alerted to the memory spiking over 95%. For me (and for any exchange admin) when i get those types of alerts i drop everything & run to the nearest PC to see what is going on.
Now the first & second time, it was an issue with logs filling up the drives, & my clean log script not running to remove any logs older than 30 days. But since then it has been legitimate 95%+ memory usage.
For the most part its been 95-97 max, with 1 or 2 times hitting 98. After some time, the memory does drop back down to 94.
this is ....umm "fine" however it is becoming a nuisance, since most of the time it corrects itself. What i dont want to happen is get into the groove of saying "ah bah! its nothing" & letting it go.
the server has 16gb of memory in it, it is the Mailbox server (CAS /Frontend is on a seperate server)
below is a screen shot, so i know the Storeworker grabs whatever it feels like grabbing, however it does NOT EVER release memory. I also see the NodeRunner.exe (2 of them) is always around 900 almost a MB
now if i could somehow get the first 2 Storeworkers to drop down to 900ish, then that should alleviate my memory issues.
what I am m looking for is some type of "magic bullet" to put my memory issues at ease..

thats the problem & seems to be a misconception.
Exchange NEVER releases the memory when other things need it. As the users state in your thread you linked. (i came across that early in my search for a resolution). An example is if another admin & myself log into the backend server at the same
time & begin clicking around opening things, etc..Memory will go to 100% which = No Buenos.
There are numerous post all over the internet from people who say it releases, but them 5 more comments to that 1 saying that it does not.
I know what the process's do, however it seems like the SP1 has increased memory usage, as typically the Store.exe would only grab about 900-1000.
in terms of the noderunner, once again i know its role, however we are now 2 months+ live on 2013 post migration, I do not think it is still indexing all those emails.
all DB's report healthy.
Name Status CopyQueue ReplayQueue LastInspectedLogTime ContentIndex
Length Length State
WBAC1\EXCHBE001 Mounted 0 0
Healthy
WBAC2\EXCHBE001 Mounted 0 0
Healthy
WBAC3\EXCHBE001 Mounted 0 0
Healthy
WBAC4\EXCHBE001 Mounted 0 0
Healthy
WBAC5\EXCHBE001 Mounted 0 0
Healthy

Excessive memory usage with FireFox 3.6.8

Is it normal for the total memory footprint of FireFox.exe and Plugin-Container.exe to be 1.14GB (488MB and 651MB respectively)?
When first opening FireFox, it's footprint is approx 30MB, but inexorably creeps upward as I browse (typically YouTube/Hulu/4chan/GMail), consuming nearly 60% of total system memory before performance loss demands a browser restart.
Is there any workaround or update/patch or command-line argument that will cap memory usage? Will rolling back to an earlier version of FF solve the problem, or is it a problem with Flash? Any advice would be appreciated.

This is caused by the Flag Fox add-on, you can either disable or uninstall it.
# Open the add-ons manager - in the menus select Tools, then Add-ons
# In the add-ons manager go to the Extensions panel
# In the list of add-ons click on Flag Fox to select it, then either click on the Disable or Uninstall button
# Re-start Firefox to complete the process
Do you have Personas Plus 1.6 installed? If you do try disabling that one instead, it has been causing problems with add-ons.

Image loadClip memory usage problem

I'm trying to create a gallery with built in slideshow. I
load the images sequentially and then use the tween class to
animate alpha values to shift between images. But when about 20-25
images are loaded, the memory usage get too high and the animations
start to lag.
I know i can remove the images again, but that means i have
to load them all over again when the slideshow starts over again.
I know there must be a solution 'cause i've seen galleries
which loads images without increasing memory usage, and the images
is cached after loading.
Hope you can help me.

No. The basic principle is that you need to set the images to
invisible. Only the two that are tweening can be visible. The
problem you are experiencing occurs when you have more than 8 or 9
images. Usually I put the first image at the bottom of the stack so
that's why I said 'the one on top'.

How can I fix a drastic and sudden increase in memory usage?

Before I start, I've already been having slight issues since the middle of last year, but I thought nothing of it. Firefox starting up using a good chunk of memory was normal, and I could run it alongside my other programs just fine. However, about 3 or 4 days ago, Firefox has started to spike in memory usage, to the point where it slows my entire computer down, will not load pages, and it's generally a mess. I always have to force close it, too, because whenever I close it conventionally, it's still open in the background. I've been having the background issue for a few months, but it's never been a large problem until the last few days. I had thought, at first, that it was the result of some programs that got installed as part of another installer. I had no issue with the installer, considering it came from a trusted forum for game design on an official topic, from a veteran member. However, it installed multiple toolbars and multiple programs. I went through all of them, uninstalled them, cleared my registry, everything was gone. However, this memory problem reared its ugly head, later. I uninstalled, reinstalled. Didn't work. I tried to reset firefox, but it stayed open in the background, and I could not reset it. I disabled my addons (ones I've been using for over a year, now), nothing. I tried to open Firefox with all addons disabled, but it stayed open in the background and refused to re-open properly. I'm actually on another browser right now because Firefox is no longer working for much of anything... I also put a couple of attachments up to show the increase in question. It starts at around 270,000 K (though the screenshot shows around 312,000), then after about 4 or 5 minutes on my homepage, shoots up to well over 1,000,000 and it basically stops functioning. If anyone has any additional steps they think I could take, I would appreciate it.

'''[https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/troubleshoot-firefox-issues-using-safe-mode Start Firefox in Safe Mode]''' {web link}
While you are in safe mode;
Type '''about:preferences#advanced'''<Enter> in the address bar.
Under '''Advanced,''' Select '''General.'''
Look for and turn off '''Use Hardware Acceleration'''.
Poke around safe web sites. Are there any problems?
'''[https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-uses-too-much-memory-ram Firefox uses too much memory (RAM) - How to fix]'''
This article describes how to make Firefox use less memory to make it run faster and prevent crashes.

Sql memory usage increase each time win app runs

Hi,
Sql memory usage increases each time when win app runs. Why does it work like this? Is it normal ?
I restart SQL Server 2012. Only my win app uses SQL server.
First run of winapp.
start memory usage : 211.800 KB
close memory usage: 528.136 KB
Second run of xaf app.
start memory usage : 528.136 KB
close memory usage: 996.844 KB
Third run of xaf app
start memory usage : 996.844 KB
close memory usage: 997.640 KB
Fourth run of xaf app
start memory usage : 997.640 KB
close memory usage: 1.104.864 KB

Hi,
Sql memory usage increases each time when win app runs. Why does it work like this? Is it normal ?
Yes, it is perfectly normal for SQL Server to acquire and hold onto large amounts of memory indefinitely. This memory improves performance by avoiding disk I/O, query plan compilation and costly memory management.
On a dedicated SQL Server you should usually let SQL Server dynamically manage memory. It will release memory if it detects memory pressure. But if you often run other applications on the server than need significant amounts of memory (e.g. IIS,
application services), you may want to set max server memory as suggested.
Dan Guzman, SQL Server MVP, http://www.dbdelta.com

When i run exe built in Labview 7.1 the memory usage goes on increasing

Dear Sir/Madam
I have built an application in LabView 7.1. When i run this application and view the memory usage in Task manager, i find that the memory usage goes on increasing.
Please help.
With Regards
Ravindra Kumbhar

Hi, Ravindra,
It looks that you have memory leak in your application.
There are lot of possible reasons for memory leaks - opened in cycle and not closed references, continuosly growing arrays, memory allocation in own DLLs, etc.
Normally you should have the same behaviour in development environment as well (memory of LabVIEW.exe incresed continuously).
You should check the code, which executed repeatable (while/for loops) for allocated, but not closed resources. What you can do is following - remove (or isolate) parts of you code, executed in cycles, then check is leak present or not. So, step by step you will found the place where leak occurred.
best regards,
Andrey.

After upgrading to Lion, the Finder will increase the virtual memory while using external HD

after upgrading to Lion, the Finder will increase the "virtual memory size" while using external HD. I check it using Activity Monitor and found that "Finder" wll increase the "Virtual Memory Size" and "Private Memory Size". and then after a while. the system told me my HD is full and hanging there.
My External HD is 1TB. and I have installed new version Paragon NTFS for Mac V.9.01. I am not sure it is related or not.
but I attached my external HD. the "Finder" will start to increase the "Virtual Memory Size".
please help out this case and solve this issue.
thank you !!!

The one has nothing to do with the other. Virtual memory size and Private memory size are used by developers to analyze their software. it has nothing to do with anything related to the user.

Solaris process memory usage increase but not forever

On Solaris 10 I have a multithreaded process with a strange behaviour. It manages complicated C++ structures (RWTVal or RWPtr). These structures are built from data stored in a database (using Pro*C). Each hour the process looks for new informacion in database, builds new structures on memory and it frees older data. But, each time it repeats this procedure, the process memory usage increases several MB (12/16MB). Process's memory usage starts from 100M until near 1,4G. Just to this point, it seems the process has memory leaks. But the strange behaviour is that after this point, the process stops to continue growing up anymore. When I try to look for memory leaks (using Purify tool) the process doesn't grow up and no significant leaks were showed. Did anyone found a similar behaviour or can explain what could be happening?

markza wrote:
Hi, thanks for responding
Ja, i guess thats possible, but to do it all one row by row seems ridiculous, and it'll be so time consuming and sluggish surely. I mean, for a months worth of data (which is realistic) thats 44640 individual queries. If push comes to shove, then I'll have to try that for sure.
You can see by the example that I'm saving it to a text file, in csv format. So it needs to be a string array, a cluster won't be of much help I dont think.
The only other way I can think of is to break it up into more manageable chunks...maybe pull each column separately in a for loop and build up a 2D array like that until the spreadsheet storing.
You only do 1 query, but instead of Fetching All (as the Select does) you'll use the cursor to step through the data.
You can use Format to String or Write Spreadsheet fire with doubles.
You can break it down to get the data day by day instead of a full month at once.
/Y
LabVIEW 8.2 - 2014
"Only dead fish swim downstream" - "My life for Kudos!" - "Dumb people repeat old mistakes - smart ones create new ones."
G# - Free award winning reference based OOP for LV

CPU/Memory Usage increases when loading SWF files in AIR.

Hi,
We face the below mentioned problem. Would be great if someone could help us.
Due to problems with uploading the attachment here, please send a email to the following email-id ([email protected]) and I shall send the attachment in response.
CPU/Memory usage increases drastically while moving the SWC components and loading the SWF Files.
"Problem Description" - On executing the sample application, a window with multiple objects is shown. The loaded SWC components in flex consume too much Memory and CPU cycles. This is visible in TaskManager. On dragging one of the object, CPU / memory usage increases drastically.
"Steps to Reproduce" -
Draggable window is placed at the bottom in the sample application with Text indication.
Drag the indicated window.
"Actual Result" - System's CPU usage increasing drastically around 50% to 60 %.
"Expected Result" - Drastical increase in memory\CPU should not occur.
"Any Workarounds" - No"
Thanks in advance.

You can control your external swf from your main.swf in the following method:
loadswf(clips[0]);
function loadswf(tmp:String):void{
    passedString=tmp;
    ldr= new Loader();
    ldr.contentLoaderInfo.addEventListener(ProgressEvent.PROGRESS, progressListener);
    ldr.contentLoaderInfo.addEventListener(Event.COMPLETE, swfLoaded);
    ldr.load(new URLRequest(animPath+tmp));
    function progressListener (e:ProgressEvent):void{
        ploader.visible=true;
    function swfLoaded(e:Event):void {
        mcExt = e.target.content as MovieClip;
        ldr.contentLoaderInfo.removeEventListener(Event.COMPLETE, swfLoaded);
        mcExt.addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME,onEnterfn);
        ploader.visible=false;
        addChild(mcExt);
function onEnterfn(e:Event):void{
    var num:int=mcExt.currentFrame;
    switch(passedString){
        case clips[0]:
            if (num==1) mcExt.play();
            if (num==9) {
               mcExt.skipmc.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK,skipfn);
                function skipfn(e:MouseEvent):void{
                    mcExt.stop();
                   mcExt.removeEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME,onEnterfn);
                    gotoAndStop("help");
            if (num==mcExt.totalFrames){
               mcExt.removeEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME,onEnterfn);
                gotoAndStop("help");
            break;

Will more memory increase my iMac performance ?

will more memory increase my iMac performance ?

Depends.
Adding RAM only makes it possible to run more programs concurrently. It doesn't speed up the computer nor make games run faster. What it can do is prevent the system from having to use disk-based VM when it runs out of RAM because you are trying to run too many applications concurrently or using applications that are extremely RAM dependent. It will improve the performance of applications that run mostly in RAM or when loading programs.

Will increasing the memory from 4Gb to 8Gb make a big difference to the speed of my Intel Core Duo 2 Mac mini?

Will increasing the memory from 4Gb to 8Gb make a big difference to the speed of my Intel Core Duo 2 Mac mini?

Well, technically no, CPU will remain the same speed. But having 8 gig will give you some room for memory hungry apps and run better with multiple apps.
Adding a SSD drive will give a second life to your macmini. I did mine a few weeks ago (240 gb SSD ) and also went from 2 to 4 gig ram. It's like having a new computer!
Good luck!

Insertion will increase memory usage

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for