Inspection rounds with PM integration QM

Hi gurus,
We need to design a plan for one area of the company that matches the needs for inspection round:
●      Planned on a regular basis for each shift.
●      The inspection round is always completed within one day, or within one shift.
●      The duration of the inspection round includes the work and the round itself within one plant.
One of the principal needs is also being able to asign measuring points to particular task lists.
We tried using the option creating our equipments as PRT and assigning it task list in PM but not sure this is the best way.
Any idea? integration PM-QM? the thing is that in QM TX-QP01...inspection plans...use materials instead of Equipments.
Thanks,
VL

VL,
I am not sure about the need to integrate QM with inspection rounds.However have you looked at the "Inspection Round" Functionality avaalable from [EHP4|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/42/fbded750e61febe10000000a422035/frameset.htm]? It looks like it might just solve your problem.
If you are in lower version, another way is to to accomplsih this is by following the below steps
1) create a Measurement point list to identify all the measurement points to be captured in each inspection
2) creating a separate Maintenance plan for this activity that would generate a Notification object on a daily basis.
3) Enhancing the Maintenance plan using user exit ( IPRM0003 User fields: Maintenance plan) to assign the above mentioned Measurement point list to the maintenance plan.
4) Assign the Measuremnt point list to the notification on create of the notification so that the measuremnet docuemnts could be recorded.
Hope it helps.
Regards
Narasimhan

Similar Messages

Inspection Rounds in Work Manager 6.0

Hi all,
We've setup Work Manager 6.0 running on SMP2.3. One of the functions that I'd like to get working is inspection rounds.
We have
Configued the standard order type PM01 to be an inspection rounds order in the work order MDO filter INSP_ORDER_TYPE.
Assigned a measurement point PRT to the order operation.
Added an Equipment number to the order operation.
In work manager I am able to access the PRT screen from the Work Order Detail PRT link. In that screen I can see the buttons for Tools, Inspection Types, Measuring Points, and Attachments. In all my testing I've never seen a Measurement Point under the Measurement Point selection.
When I've checked the data structure in the Agentry Test Environment the measurement point entries come up in the PRT section under the Operation section. They are missing any value in the RecordID field. Other PRT types have this information filled and I assume that it provides the link to the measurement point information downloaded for the functional location and equipment data structures under the operation structure.
Inspection Rounds are working fine in the back end using standard confirmation transaction iw42.
Any suggestions?
thank you
Steve.
Tags edited by: Michael Appleby

Thank you Syam,
We have activated 'LOG_EAM_LINEAR_1' and '/SMERP/EHP5_EAM_BUS_FUNC' and we now get inspection round measurement points coming through to Work Manager.
Separate switches for the functions in future releases is a solid idea. Any customer who is not running linear assets will have to debate with their account manager if the want to use inspection rounds. Linear generally attracts an additional license cost.
Back to Inspection Rounds. The measurement points come through only if the functional location or equipment record is explicitly specified on the operation. In the ECC functionality any measurement point can be specified as long as it is in the hierarchy beneath the functional location/equipment referenced on the operation. I assume that work manager limits this to minimise data sent to the device.
Does the parameter OBJECT_HIER_LEVEL'' on the 'WORKORDER_GENERIC' MDO have any impact on the collection of Functional Location and Equipment data at the operation level. We are debugging and initially find a section of code relating to BDS documents. Do you know the scope of the parameter? Changing it's value seems to have no impact on the inclusion/exclusion of measurement points. Debugging continues.....
Ideally the get work order routine would be able to identify the required Functional Location and Equipment records from the measurement point PRTs themselves, that way only push the required records to the device, rather than a full hierarchy (assuming that full hierarchy was an option). As it stands it looks like we'd need to implement a BADI to restrict the assignment of measurement point PRTs in ECC to only measurement points attached to the functional location and equipment record explicitly referenced on the operation. If that wasn't done then you could add measurement PRTs in ECC that you couldn't process in Work Manager.
Thank you again for your assistance.
Steve.

Inspection lot with 01 origin for stock transfer (Intra company STO)?

Hi Sap Gurus,
As per standard SAP configuration for 101 movement type, 08 is the inspection type used for stock transfers (Intra company STO). But, there is a requirement from business to use 01 for Intra STO. Is it possible to get an inspection lot with 01 origin while GR to the delivery created for Intra STO ( Stock transfer B/n plants from same company code)?.
Thanks in advance
Venkat V

Hi All,
Thanks for your replies..
Its STO Purchase order between two plants under same company code. System triggers movement type 101 with movement indicator B - Goods movement for Purchase order and Receipt indicator X - Stock transport order. Here system expects inspection lot origin 08 as per standard SAP configuration(OMJJ).
I just wanted to check, is it possible to get inspection lot from 01 origin for this type of stock transfers. If anyone who worked on this area, please share your inputs.
Thanks in advance
Venkat V

Creation of Recurring Inspection Lots with Serial numbers

Hello,
We have the following scenario at our client :
MIGO_GR is used to create GR for materials with Serial number requirement. The serial numbers can be generated automatically or manually entered on the screen. At this point of time, the Shelf Life expiry date & Next Inspection date are calculated based upon the Production date. The Batch gets created with Next Inspection date, Inspection Lots are created and the Serial numbers are assigned by the system. The stock moves into QI.
The stock is moved from Quality restricted to Unrestricted stock via QA11. The serial numbers are handled by the system or can be managed on screen.
Transaction QA07 (Deadline Monitoring of Batches) is used to create Recurring Inspection. QA07 gives error message IO304 that "Only 0 serial numbers entered instead of 1". The problem is that system doesn't pick up the corresponding serial numbers.
OSS # 497845 mentions that Transaction QA07 can not handle serial number. The serial numbers are very critical to the business process.
Has anyone come across this situation before ? Please suggest solution or workaround. I tried using BAdI "INSPECTIONLOT_UPDATE" & was able to create Inspection Lots with serial number assignment, also manipulated Batch to change the Next Inspection date. The problem is Material Movement (322) Document does NOT get created.
Also tried implementing BAdI as per OSS # 608830 but doesn't give desired results.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Homiar Kalwachwala.

Hello all,
Just wanted to bring this on top to be noticed.
Would appreciate any help, suggestions...
Regards,
Homiar.

MBAM 2.5 with SCCM Integration

Hi
I've installed MBAM 2.5 and now need to roll back the changes as I didn't specify the -SsrsServer value and this is hosted on a different server. When I try to run Disable-MbamCMIntegration I'm getting the following error
Disable-MbamCMIntegration : Could not find System Center role settings for 'Reporting Services Point' role at site
'xxx' on server 'Value removed'
At line:1 char:1
+ Disable-MbamCMIntegration
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (:) [Disable-MbamCMIntegration], ReportingServicesNotConfiguredException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : Microsoft.Mbam.Setup.Common.CmIntegration.ReportingServicesNotConfiguredException,Micros
oft.Mbam.Server.Commands.DisableMbamCMIntegrationCommand
If I try to install the Web Applications on my MBAM server with SCCM integration it fails with the following
The web application prerequisite check found missing prerequisites
The specified Configuration Manager integration mode does not match the Configuration Manager integration mode currently in use

Sure
If you edit the following key in the registry on your SCCM server
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\MBAM Server\Enabled\CMIntegration to 0 and then restart the server it will allow you to re-add the feature with a different config.

Unable to install MBAM 2.5 with SCCM integration on named SQL instance

Hi,
in production i am installing MBAM 2.5 with SCCM integration but during the installation it asks for the SCCM reporting services point and which it is unable to recognize.
whereas in my lab environment i have default SQL instance which has reporting installed, in that case it works fine.
can someone let me know why the issue is coming?
in the event log the issue is : Description = "user domain\username is not able to get the lock at this time.Error:0x40480732"

For the integration part, You need to install the MBAM SCCM Integration feature on SCCM server. For compliance reporting in integration, MBAM uses the Reporting service point for SCCM.
When installing the SCCM integration feature, you need to provide the name of the reporting Server where Reporting Service point role is installed for SCCM. But it does not provides any option for the instance but for the Server only. We have two instances
for SQL. One for CAS and other for Primary site. We need to run the installer on CAS and hence need to connect to the SQL instance for CAS.
We have also tried with the powershell commands but it is not working either.
Is there any way to install MBAM integration feature on a SQL instance. As far as I know, it automatically picks the instance but not happening for me.
Gaurav Ranjan

Getting started with EP integration

Hi,
A company I work for has a .NET web application that they would like to integrate into the SAP Enterprise Portal. There are a few .aspx pages that should be accessed from the portal. So, we would like to create a tab for our application and have a few links that open the .aspx pages. Eventually, we would like to get the integration certified.
This is the first time I've worked with SAP. From what I've read, doing this type of integration should be fairly easy, but I am not sure how to start. I'm hoping someone will be kind enough to give me some tips or point me to some good source of information.
I've installed the NW04SneakPrevJavaSP11, which I believe contains everything I need for SAP including the NetWeaver Developer Studio. I also installed PDK for .NET and it looks like it has integrated properly with Visual Studio.
When I extracted the content of the PDK for .NET, it contained two files, com.sap.portal.dotnet.framework.sda and com.sap.portal.dotnet.services.systems.sda. I do not see these services in my Control Panel Services. I've read that I must deploy these through the SDM, but I did not figure out how to do that.
Can someone please provide some instructions to get me started with this integration? Do you have a simple example that adds a tab for an application in the portal and contains a link to open a URI? What should I look for to verify that I have everything installed and working correctly to begin the integration?
Thank you very much!

Hi Kenneth,
If you are looking at integrating .Net web application with SAP EP there are two ways of doing it -
1. Uset the PDK for .Net and then develop the .Net applications using the Newweaver controls, finally deploy this .Net application on the Portal itself.
2. If this .Net application is already built and running on a different server other that EP, u can intergate this using a URL reference ans enable SSO form EP to this .Net application. The effort in this case will be very less.
If you choose the 1st approach , then you have to configure SAP EP to deploy .Net applications -
1. Configure the .Net runtime in EP
2. Install the PSK plugin in Visual Studio.
The two SDA files have to be imported in your Portal using the Software deployment manager, the person who has installed EP will be aware of this.
There is also a pdf document on SDN which explains everything in detail about the configurations required for PDK for .Net.
Regards,
Vivek
Please reward points if helpfull.

Not able to deploy VIO 1.0.1 with NSX integration

Hello,
Whenever I try to deploy VIO with NSX integration I stuck on "Configure Neutron networking" step.
Edge Cluster drop-down menu does not contain any options and so I cannot proceed with the deployment. (DVS works fine)
As this a POC deployment, I use the same cluster for Management nodes, NSX Edge nodes and users VMs.
According to the documentation that configuration is supported, even it is not recommended.
Thanks,
Max

Please check if you have the prerequisites met for NSX integration for VIO.
Create a Virtual Distributed Switch(s) and add all hosts from both the management and compute clusters.
On separate VLANs, create three port groups: Management, External, and Public API Network. The fourth port group, VXLAN Transport, is created inline with the NSX installation:
The Management network carries traffic among the management components. This network requires 13 or more static IP addresses.
The Public API network exposes the OpenStack dashboard and provides access for tenants to the OpenStack APIs and services. This network requires 3 or more static IP addresses.
The External network provides external access for the instances. This network requires 8 or more static IP addresses.
The Transport network is used to carry traffic among the instances. This network requires 1 address for each host in the Edge and Compute clusters
Note: Some designs you may collapse both the Public API Network and External network into a single network segment.
-nathan

Inspection Lot with Zero stock posting qty

Dear QM Consultants,
We have come across following scenario,
1.     Repetitive manufacturing
2.     Material has inspection type 04 and Z04. Preferred inspection type is not ticked. Z04 inspection type has been assigned to inspection lot 04.
3.     Production GR done by 131 movement
4.     Inspection lot generated with reference to 131 movement type. Lot for inspection type 04 is created.
5.     Inspection lot qty in QA32 it shows correctly as that of GR qty.
6.     But when we click on UD, in stock posting tab, qty to be posted it shows as ZERO. So no qty is available for stock posting.
Has anybody came across such scenario? Is this any bug? Any SAP note for this?
Best Regards,
Anand Rao

Dear Sujit, Thanks for so prompt reply,
Basically this is a complex case,
1.     See we have set Posting Proposal in Usage Decision as u2018To unrestricted useu2019 in selected sets for usage decision. That means we need not every time go to stock posting tab. The moment we select ACC UD code it automatically posts the stock to unrestricted use.
2.     Now, what has happed, by 131 movement declaration, backflush happened with 261 movement for child parts.
3.     Inspection lots with inspection type 04 were created. (Here we did not note whether the stock was posted in quality inspection or in unrestricted use)
4.     Now the requirement is to cancel 131 movement document. Kindly note UD were not given up to this moment.
5.     Now through MFBF, user did document specific reversal. As a result of which and as per my knowledge 132 movement should happen and 262 should also happen. At the same time inspection lot status should be set to LTCA. But in actual case 132 movement happened and 262 did not. Surprisingly inspection lot did not set to LTCA status. It remained in REL mode only.
6.     After this document specific reversal, user gave UD to these inspection lots without noticing where the stock was lying.(in unrestricted or in quality inspection). So the lot status set to UD   ICCO SPCO STUP after giving usage decision.
7.     Now while doing reverse engineering that why 262 movement did not happen, we came to know that no 321 movement happened for the inspection lots which were generated with reference 131 movement document
8.     Also, qty to be posted it shows ZERO as explained in my earlier post.
9.     When we display 132 movement document through MIGO, in where tab it shows stock type as Quality inspection. That means stock was lifted from QI for 132 movement.
In short it cannot be predicted where the stock was actually posted whether in QI or in unrestricted use. But yes the post to inspection stock tick has been ticked in material master.
Can you help further in this regard?
Best Regards
Anand Rao

No rounding with rounding profil when conversion Roundg Unit Purch Unit

Hello,
I have a trouble when I try to make a purchase order with a material which has this data:
Base unit ST
Purchase unit on info record : CAR
Rouding profil on info record : only with unit PAQ (%+ 50 ; %-50)
Variable purchase order unit : 1 active.
CAR = 10 ST
PAQ = 5 ST
When I make a purchase order, the quantity is only rounding with the purchase unit.
Does anybody know why?
Thanks a lot for your help.
Sarah
Edited by: Sarah Ah on May 24, 2011 11:15 AM

Hi
Its quite difficult to suggest something based on your inputs.
In purchase orders, the system rounds to the unit of measure most suitable for logistics purposes.
You can refer the documentation on dynamic rounding profile
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/en/4c/420da3470a11d1894a0000e8323352/frameset.htm
Thanks !
E.Avudaiappan

Conflicting inspection types with 101 for Purch Order and 101 for Proc Ordr

We have a material that can be purchased or produced in-house. When we purchase the material, we want to inspect it with a specific inspection plan for purchased material. When we produce the material with a 101 on the process order, we inspect but we typically create the inspection lot when the process order is created and NOT with the 101 GR movement. The process order creation inspection is different from the one we want on the purchase order receipt. We also sometimes have a need to create an inspection lot at the time of a GR on the process order for this material and we have created a 901 movement type (a copy of the 101) for this. However, in IMG customizing we can not update the inspection origin assigned to the movement type. When we try to post a GR to the process order using the 901 movement we get the inspection lot linked to the inspection type for the 101 of the purchase order receipt. I would like to resolve this problem with IMG customization as opposed to using a user EXIT.

Thank you for your responses. I finally had time to test these.
The inspection as the last step in the master recipe is not an option for our process.
Activating the 04 inspection type on the material master QM view, resulted in the 101 for the process order to post into QI and to create an inspection lot. I want the 101 for the process order to post to unrestricted and NOT create the inspection lot. I want the 901 (a clone of the 101) to post into QI and to CREATE the inspection lot. I have changed the configuration in OMJJ to deactivate QM for all 101's with all blanks in special stock and 'F' in Movement Indicator. The 901 movemens have QM active. Any other ideas or settings that I need to check/change?

MBAM 2.0 with SCCM Integration: Recovery Audit Reports errors.

I have installed MBAM 2.0 with SCCM integration according to the following website:
http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2013/06/10/how-to-install-mbam-2-0-with-configmgr-integration/
Topology:
SCCM 2012
SCCM SQL Server
MBAM Server
MBAM SQL Server
Components installed:
Integration components on SCCM 2012 server
Compliance and Audit Reports on SCCM SQL Server
Recovery and Audit Databases on MBAM SQL Server
Self-Service and Administration Monitoring on MBAM Server
Everything is running correctly: SCCM sees compliance reports, keys are populating into the Recovery database. Self-service works correctly as tested.
However, the Recovery Audit Report in the /Helpdesk webpage reports an error:
"Cannot create a connection to data source 'DataSource1'. (rsErrorOpeningConnection)
Browsing to the /Reports page on the MBAM SQL server (with reporting) yields an empty page.
If I install the Audit and Compliance reports onto the MBAM SQL server, those populate (but are empty, as SCCM is handling that component), however, the Recovery Audit Report still yields the same error.
Ideas?
Thanks,
-Patrick

You can put the Audit Reports on the SSRS instance on SCCM Server. But it has its own limitations. What if you want to configure the encrypted configuration within the MBAM environment using SSL certificate. In that case you have to take special
care while using the SSL certificate for configuring the reporting Point as it has been also used by the SCCM.
Gaurav Ranjan
So, let me get this clear, I can install the Audit Reports onto the SRSS I am using for SCCM and not have to deploy an SRSS instance elsewhere? The SSL certificate detail is not an issue. I am desperately trying to avoid yet another instance of
SRSS.
Thanks

ANN: Spring 1.2 with TopLink Integration Released

Version 1.2 of the Spring Framework has been released. New in the 1.2 final release is support for TopLink "out of the box". Prior to 1.2, TopLink support was an "add on" that was available on OTN. Now Spring ships with the integration code required to use TopLink as a persistence provider. TopLink 10.1.2 (9.0.4) and 10.1.3 (preview) are supported.
To get started, try out the Pet Clinic sample app configured to use TopLink.
NB: Spring doesn't include TopLink; it provides the necessary integration classes. You still need to download both Spring and TopLink.
- Shaun
Spring Home page: http://www.springframework.org
Spring 1.2 Announcement: http://www.springframework.org/node/86

Version 1.2 of the Spring Framework has been released. New in the 1.2 final release is support for TopLink "out of the box". Prior to 1.2, TopLink support was an "add on" that was available on OTN. Now Spring ships with the integration code required to use TopLink as a persistence provider. TopLink 10.1.2 (9.0.4) and 10.1.3 (preview) are supported.
To get started, try out the Pet Clinic sample app configured to use TopLink.
NB: Spring doesn't include TopLink; it provides the necessary integration classes. You still need to download both Spring and TopLink.
- Shaun
Spring Home page: http://www.springframework.org
Spring 1.2 Announcement: http://www.springframework.org/node/86

Connect one Business system with two Integration Server

Hello,
Can we able to connect one Business System with two Integration Server?
I have one Business system (ECC 6.0 with the client 900) and it is already connected with PI 7.0 system.Can I able to connect the same sytem (with same client) with PI7.1?
I want to do the HTTP Connection for ABAP Proxy for this two XI system with one business Sytem ?
Is this possible ?Is there any work around solution there?
Thanks.

Hello ,
This document describes about connecting with Two PI7.1 system using Application Server 7.1 and Application Server 7.0 SP14 .
I want to connect same ECC system via abap proxy with two different PI system .One is PI7.0 and another one is PI7.1 system.
Is this possible if i use Application Server 7.1 or Application Server 7.0 SP14 ?
Thanks.
Lakshmi
Edited by: Muthulakshmi Pandi on Apr 16, 2009 11:48 PM
Edited by: Muthulakshmi Pandi on Apr 17, 2009 12:21 AM

Problems with accounting integration cProjects

Dear Sirs,
I have some problems with accounting integration between my cProjects 3.10 and my ECC 5.0 system. I have followed the steps in the configuration guide as good I as can. However when I create a project, and go the accounting tab I get the following error:
The project is unknown in Accounting
Message no.
DPR_FIN_GECCO006
Diagnosis
Etc..
In the Cockpit for Controlling Integration I can see the following error at the time the project is created, and a new similar error is created when the status is set to released replicated.
No company code could be determined. Message No IAOM_CPROJECTS001.
In this message there is a reference to the fact that the company code can be set in the assigned model order for CPR1. I have created such a model order with a reference to company code 0100 for CPR1. However this does not seem to do the job.
I seem to be stuck, as I have tried every possible and unpossible lead to get any further. Any input for someone with the knowhow is highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Jørgen Ruud

Hello Jørgen,
It sounds strange, normally after create a model order and assigned to the scenario CPR1, then the determination of company code should work.
logic: CPR1 -> model order -> company code
Would you please try the note 875275, if it can help.
In case that it does not help, you can eithter use the Badi method to set it hardly, or create a customer message to let SAP check it.
name of Badi DPR_FIN_GECCO_ATTR
code like following:
      ls_attribute-data_element     = space.
      ls_attribute-value            = '1000'.
      ls_attribute-field_name_orext = 'BUKRS'.
      ls_attribute-fldname_receiver = space.
      ls_attribute-struc_name_copa = space.
      ls_attribute-field_name_copa = space.
      ls_attribute-ext_attr_name    = space.
      ls_attribute-ext_attr_value   = space.
      INSERT ls_attribute INTO TABLE ct_attributes.
regards!
Zhenbo

Inspection rounds with PM integration QM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for