Invalid mark up XHTML 1.0 Strict

I check my pages on XHTML and CSS validators both in DW and
other sites. my css is all correct and my xhtml is correct except
for the flash div. The code is too long to put here, can someone go
put this url through a xhtml validating page and see what I mean? I
need to know how to correct the errors.
swf is on this
page

Nobody???

Similar Messages

DW8 writing invalid xhtml 1.0 strict code

My XHTML 1.0 STRICT doc created in DW8 design view has
invalid attributes hspace &align
<img src="images/massage.jpg" alt="massage" width="240"
height="160" hspace="10" align="right" />
It would appear that setting doc pref to xhtml1.0 strict does
nothing but change the page declaration and DW continues to write
xhtml 1.0 trans code.
Is this to be fixed?

> get it?
No, I definitely wouldn't want it to write that into my page.
If it were going to recreate the effect of hspace="10", it
would have to
write -
margin-left:10px; margin-right:10px;
and position:static is unnecessary and redundant with the
default.
Plus, I wouldn't want it to add inline styles to my tags. I
could see it
prompting for a class name to use to hold this new style....
But, it's not up to us to decide this anyhow. If you have
filed a wish
form, then you have done the best you can do....
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"bikeman01" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:[email protected]...
>
quote:
Originally posted by:
Newsgroup User
> What you're suggesting is that Dreamweaver should
disable certain
> attributes in the Property inspector when a strict DTD
is selected. It
> may be a useful improvement, and Murray has already
given you the URL
> for bug reports and feature requests. However, the way
that Dreamweaver
> works at the moment is that it expects anyone selecting
a strict DTD to
> know XHTML well enough to avoid using deprecated
elements.
>
> --
> David Powers, Adobe Community Expert
> Author, "Foundation PHP for Dreamweaver 8" (friends of
ED)
> Author, "PHP Solutions" (friends of ED)
>
http://foundationphp.com/
>
>
> I have raised a report
>
> But I expect it not to just grey out properties I also
expect it to write
> valid xhtml e.g.
>
> NOT hspace="10" align="right"
>
> BUT INSTEAD style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;
position: static"
>
> get it?
>
> I don't accept the answer that 'DW8 expects designers
who select 1.0
> strict to
> know not to use depreciated elements' - Macromedia/Adobe
provide code
> completion/properties panels as a tool for ease of use
for those designers
> who
> are not code experts. It would be better if they wrote
no code at all
> rather
> than incorrect code.
>
>
>
>

Loading Flash content using loadMedia??? Or else??? Has to be XHTML 1.0 Strict and WAG valid

I have a new project into which i have to insert SWF into an HTML page using other way that the standard Abobe way to do it.
I know about Flash Satay but i have 300s Flash files to insert and dont want to reopen each of them.
My HTML pages have to W3C comply and as you know, the <classic id> or <embed> tag isnt valid regarding XHTML 1.0 Strict.
Client, who insists that his media be accessible to EVERYBODY, suggested using
"javascript:loadMedia('flashContainer','flv/v01.flv', '', '', 'fra', '','','', 'false');"><img src="images/flashFr.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
where loadMedia is a function with these parameters

Do you know about that? Can you help? Do you know any other way to insert Flash content with respect to:
- Javascript on/off valid
- XHTML 1.0 Strict valid
- WAG valid.

I am VERY concerned with the fact that my pages are not being properly validated and displayed.
I have created two different sites using iWeb '08 and while I am satisfied with the ease of use, I am concerned that my sites are not being displayed correctly... in fact, the other day my friend who is a Mac whiz and who hosts my business website on his server... tried to visit the site that I created using iWeb '08 and had published to my .Mac account... it caused his browser to flat out crash! He said he hasn't seen anything like that in years!
Here is the site I have begun to build http://www.mcleanmonowheel.com
If you paste this url into http://validator.w3.org/ a slew of errors pop up.
Is this the norm with iWeb or have I done something wrong on my end???
-Patrick

Invalid Mark-up Warning - Overlapping or Unclosed Tag

QUESTION: When the following code is placed into a PHP document created by Dreamweaver an invalid mark-up warning is received and several of the HTML tags are highlighted with yellow. According to the warning an overlapping or unclosed tag is present. Unfortunately, I cannot find an overlapping or unclosed tag.
In an effort to determine the presence or absence of extraneous characters, I cut the code, placed it into a text file, and removed all formatting. I then pasted it back into the document, saved the document, and still the invalid mark-up warning occurred.
1) What is going on?
2) Should I just ignore it?
With the exception of an alignment problem of the headerInclude and Mainpage divisions everything appears fine.
CODE:
<body class="oneColElsCtr">
     <div id="container">
          <div id="headerInclude">
               <?php include("header.php"); ?>
          </div>
          <div id="mainContent">
               <h1>The Include( ) Function</h1>
               <p>This is the content of my Mainpage. The header to my Mainpage is created with a server-side include using the PHP include( ) function.</p>
           </div>
       </div>
</body>
Roddy

kiusau wrote:
Yes, that appears to have fixed the problem.
I am sorry to be so persistent, but the problem has returned.
This time, however, with new insight:
Though the mark-up error does not appear when the file is reopened after rebooting Dreamweaver, it does reappear when I open the file to be included. In short, whatever is causing the mark-up error appears to require two files: the one that contains the include( ) function, and the one that is included.
What I eventually thought to be a fluke appears to be a reoccurring phenomenon. Alas!
Any other suggestions?
Roddy

Java *xhtml traditional and strict question

I had to copy a piece of java code into the head of a new
xhtml doc. The original page and the first couple of lines of code
are the original code below
<html xmlns="
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1" />
<title>index</title>
<script language="javascript">AC_FL_RunContent =
0;</script>
<script src="AC_RunActiveContent.js"
language="javascript"></script>
<script language="javascript">
function scrolling(){
document.body.scrollTop = 750;
</script>
I made a new page in Dreamweaver /the default is xhtml
transitional
and copied the code so the page looks like this
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0
Transitional//EN" "
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8" />
<meta name="description" content="Your description goes
here" />
<meta name="keywords" content="your,keywords,goes,here"
/>
<meta name="author" content="Your Name" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
href="/2009/idnynew.css" title="andreas08"
media="screen,projection" />
<title>XXXXXXXX</title>
<script language="javascript">AC_FL_RunContent =
0;</script>
<script src="../AC_RunActiveContent.js"
language="javascript"></script>
<script language="javascript">
function scrolling(){
document.body.scrollTop = 750;
</script>
The java function does not work in the xhtml traditional or
strict xhtml for that matter.
Can someone tell me why and what I have to change oin the
java to make it work in xhtml trans or strict?
Is it healthy to leave it alone and put the page up the way
it is deletting the first line of code?
anybody?

oops.
I meant to say which ones.
I have look at w3.org and haven't found the answer.
cs

Jpeg Invalid Marker Issue

Hi
After copying all my data from one drive to another, many jpeg files won't open due to an "invalid marker" error. Those same jpegs open fine in Apple's built in Preview and they do all have tiny thumbnails. I am pretty sure the files aren't corrupted since they do open in another program, but I can't get Bridge or Photoshop to recognize/open them. I'm tearing my hair out here - please help!
Many thanks,
LMW

I respect and appreciate Gene's response, but in my experience, a message about an invalid marker in a JPEG means your file is irretrievably lost. Wish you the best luck, of course.
Files can and do get corrupted in a variety of ways;
First and foremost, a hard drive going south.
Working (opening and/or saving) off a server across a network.
Program errors.
Setup inadequacies (not enough RAM or Scratch drive space)
or if PEBKAC
The most common causes are the first two.

_FreeSegGetNext: invalid marker

My console log is getting this message very frequently:
4/18/10 2:16:42 AM com.apple.coreservicesd[29] _FreeSegGetNext: invalid marker.
and
4/18/10 2:16:42 AM com.apple.coreservicesd[29] _FreeSegGetLength: invalid marker.
Anybody know what would generate that, and how to fix it? I'm not even sure what core services does...
Thanks--
Greg

It's been a few weeks, so I figured I'd try again. Anyone know where this is coming from? My logs are turning into long runs of nothing but these messages...

Invalid Marker position.

Hi..
i'm trying to burn my project all done using DVD studio Pro, it consists of 3 menus connected to each other and a couple of slideshows linked to them. But when i pressed Burn and it started the build at the end of building a acertain slideshow an error occured and said, "Invalid Marker position. Distance between markers must be at least .4 seconds"
ANy help please!! everything accepted..

Go into your preferences and in the 'tracks' section, check the 'fix invalid markers on build' option.

Invalid marker: c2lcp:ItemDataExtra

Hi,
We use to download courses in the repository SAP LSO AE 604_14 and Java 1.4.2_19.
When I trying to import a course, as reusable media obj. At the stage of conversion into the SAP AE format will get an error Invalid marker: c2lcp:ItemDataExtra.
Also attache imsmanifest.xml.https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/53172073/imsmanifest.xml
Please help to resolve the problem.

Colleagues problem was corrected by removing the tag c2lcp:ItemDataExtra.
And generation SCORM package in another environment.

Invalid Marker Position on Build

When I attempt to Build and Format a project in DVD Studio Pro 3, I receive and error message: "Invalid Marker position. Distance between markers must be at least .4 seconds".
I find no markers on export from FCP that are this close.
I would much appreciate any suggestions...

Hi Steve
Welcome to the forum.
In the DVDSP preferences window, in the Track tab there's a check box that says 'Fix Invalid Markers On Build'. Tick this box and that should solve your problem.
Cheers
B

Doctype -- XHTML Transitional or Strict?

I am working on my first site with DW 8. I took a couple of
classes and have been learning as much as I can about HTML and CSS.
When choosing the DOCTYPE, is there any reason not to use XHTML 1.0
Strict? As far as I can tell, people seem to mostly use XHTML 1.0
Transitional (or an earlier version). I'd appreciate a little more
explanation about why Transitional XHTML is used instead of Strict.
I've been reading about problems with boxes in IE 5.5 that can be
fixed using conditional comments which would include some extra CSS
code (* html). Would this interfere with validation? Is there any
way to change the DOCTYPE for pages I have already started?

> is there any reason not to use XHTML 1.0 Strict?
No. If your skill can support the use of this doctype, it's
fine to use.
> Would this interfere with validation?
No.
> Is there any way to change the
> DOCTYPE for pages I have already started?
In CS3, use FILE | Convert ...
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
==================
"Daylilybud" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:frlanb$ec$[email protected]..
>I am working on my first site with DW 8. I took a couple
of classes and
>have
> been learning as much as I can about HTML and CSS. When
choosing the
> DOCTYPE,
> is there any reason not to use XHTML 1.0 Strict? As far
as I can tell,
> people
> seem to mostly use XHTML 1.0 Transitional (or an earlier
version). I'd
> appreciate a little more explanation about why
Transitional XHTML is used
> instead of Strict. I've been reading about problems with
boxes in IE 5.5
> that
> can be fixed using conditional comments which would
include some extra CSS
> code
> (* html). Would this interfere with validation? Is there
any way to change
> the
> DOCTYPE for pages I have already started?
>

XHTML 1.0 strict messing up tables

I have a programmer who is using XHTML 1.0 strict. My table
heights dont behave. I have a space under all my graphics that I
dont seem to be able to get rid of. Dont have a clue what is
causing this.
The site is designed. I can't show you because I signed a
non-disclosure.
This table doesnt work:
<table width="750" border="0" align="center"
cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td><img src="images/logo.gif" alt="Logo"
width="273" height="133" hspace="0" vspace="0" border="0"
/></td>
<td><img src="images/purpleback2.gif" alt="Purple"
width="62" height="133" hspace="0" vspace="0" border="0"
/></td>
<td><img src="images/kids1.gif" alt="Kids"
width="415" height="133" hspace="0" vspace="0" border="0"
/></td>
</tr>
</table>
There is an approx. 3 pixel height under my graphics.
Hope someone can help. I cannot go to all CSS on this
one.

cindy1074 wrote:
> I have a programmer who is using XHTML 1.0 strict. My
table heights dont
> behave. I have a space under all my graphics that I dont
seem to be able to get
> rid of. Dont have a clue what is causing this.
Table height is not valid so if you are using a strict doc
type it will
ignore table height.
As for the space beneath your images try adding to your css
img {
display: block;
> The site is designed. I can't show you because I signed
a non-disclosure.
>
> This table doesnt work:
> <table width="750" border="0" align="center"
cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
> <tr>
> <td><img src="images/logo.gif" alt="Logo"
width="273" height="133"
> hspace="0" vspace="0" border="0" /></td>
> <td><img src="images/purpleback2.gif"
alt="Purple" width="62" height="133"
> hspace="0" vspace="0" border="0" /></td>
> <td><img src="images/kids1.gif" alt="Kids"
width="415" height="133"
> hspace="0" vspace="0" border="0" /></td>
> </tr>
> </table>
>
> There is an approx. 3 pixel height under my graphics.
>
> Hope someone can help. I cannot go to all CSS on this
one.
>

Validation Errors with Spry tabbed panels with doctype XHTML 1.0 Strict

I'm getting errors while using the W3C Validation Service on my Strict XHTML 1.0 pages that use the SPRY Tabbed Panels. I've read a few places that W3C has no plans on 'fixing or relaxing" the restrictions. Is there any type of work around to the Spry Widget Tab panels code ??? All of my other pages validate nicely... hate to go back to Transitional afterconverting all my other code.
The DreamWeaver File validation also gives me errors but I think that is fed from W3C.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Pat
Line 31, Column 46: there is no attribute "tabindex"
… <li class="TabbedPanelsTab" tabindex="0">Want a professional looking Logo ?</…

Use Spry 2.0
You can see a live demo of Spry 2.0 widgets below (contains valid markup).
http://alt-web.com/sandbox/Spry-test.html
Unless you're incorporating XML applications into your web site, there is not much reason to use XHTML Strict doc types. That standard was last revised in 2002. It has since been replaced with HTML5.
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/

Invalid marks in partno

what is the set of invalid characters in partno in WebTools?

First, this is only a 5.9 problem. There are no invalid characters in Webtools 6.
Generally, anything that would cause SQL to fail or be misinterpretted in a URL.
tic ('), #, &, ?
I recall that dash and space where causing problems at one point, though I can not remember which version.

Invalid meta tag generated when using XHTML method

Hi,
I'm trying to generate an XHTML file using XSL and the XHTML output method. However, transformation results in adding the following XHTML-invalid meta tag (uppercase and non-closing) in the head tag:
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
Is it a bug in the XDK or am I missing something? Transform is performed using the JXTransformer provided in 11g.
Thanks in advance,
Stephane
input file:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xml:lang='en' lang='en' xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<head>
     <title>Some title</title>
</head>
<body></body>
</html>
xsl file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
     <xsl:output method="xhtml"
doctype-public="-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" doctype-system="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"/>
<xsl:template match="*">
     <xsl:element name="{local-name()}" namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
          <xsl:apply-templates />
     </xsl:element>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
output:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
*<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">*
<title>Some title</title></head><body></body></html>

For some reason when I use MapForce tool to generate my xslt mapping source, it is generating the following statement in the xsl file.
     <xsl:namespace-alias stylesheet-prefix="n" result-prefix="#default"/>
So at the root element of XML file, it is replacing the character n with '#default' for some reason, I don;t know the purpose of this.
As you suggested, I changed the name space, still I experienced same problem.
It is now resolved after removing the above xsl statement from the xsl file before creating/uploading the relevant zip file into archives folder.
It works fine now. Thanks for the clue.

Invalid mark up XHTML 1.0 Strict

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for