Invoice Aggregation for condition Items

Dear Experts,
The PO conatins 25 item .. I have put conditions in the header of the PO .. then I did a GR to this PO to all items ..
The problem is when I execute a MIRO against this PO the system split the Condition on all the items .. so the MIRO document will contains 50 item ..
I need the MIRO contains the 25 item then the conditions items cumulative not splitted for every item
Please Advice
Best Regards

hi Vikrant,
in my opinion there is no way to reduce the number of lines in the invoice.
In the delivery note, you have single lines for the batches and you need this für goods movement.
In Invoice, you can't add lots of delevery - lines in one single invoice-line.
The foriegn trade data have to be correct in the invoice.
You can alter the Printing-Program and here you can add the 100 Lines into one line at the printing.
hans

Similar Messages

  • How to Create a Pro Forma invoice (F5) for selecetd items in the order?

    Hello,
    Is there a way to create a F5 Proforma invoice for an order, but for selected items? e.g if the sales order has 5 line items , is there a way to select the items we want to create the proforma for? or it's always going to create the proforma for all eligible items?
    Thank you so much.
    Irfan

    Dear Satish,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Without getting into config and setting up the invoice split criteria, when creating a proforma is there a way to select the line items from the order and create the pro forma invoice only for those items?
    Thanks.
    Irfan

  • Excise Invoice Capture for remaining item

    Hello All,
    I have one query, i have captured the excise invoice in MIGO, now while posting I came to kno that there are 5 items in the excise invoice, whereas in the captured excise invoice in migo there are 4 items (excise details for 1 item were not maintained). now if I add the duty of the remaining item in the other items, the same duties will flow to MIRO and also the excise duty for the 5th item will also come in MIRO. if I dont post the excise invoice for the one item which i have not captured, I am not able to take the credit for that item in the excise invoice.
    Please guide me how to proceed.
    regards
    Ashish

    Hi,
    U can do the following-
    -capture the excise invoice for 4 items and post it.(say excise invoice no is 123)
    -capture the excise invoice for 1 item with excise invoice no say 123#   also post the same.
    -then do the MIRO for vendor u will get the total duties as well as excise amount values.
    regards,
    sujit borse

  • A/R invoice PLD for BOM items need to hide the unit price

    Dear All,
    Our customer would like to have an A/R invoice like this: if the invoice has any BOM item, the unit price of child items should be hid. That means, I need to determine, if the item is the child of its parent, hide the unit price of it. Is there any way for me to know which item is the child item in A/R invoice PLD? I cannot find a column like status of item in the table that tells me this item is a regular item and that item is the child of an item. Thanks a lot.
    Regards,
    Yuka

    Thanks for your reply. The problem is, an item in the invoice might be the child item or the regular item.
    e.g, we have item A and B, they the child item of C. In the invoice, the customer may order 5 item C then add 10 item A as well.
    Then the invoice will like this
    C    5
    A    5
    B    5
    A    10
    Then they would like to hide A 5 B 5 but display A 10 as regular item.

  • Invoice Verification for Conditions, e.g. Freight Delivery Cost

    PO was created with conditions, i.e. freight.
    Example:  100 items & 2 USD = 200 USD (Main Product)
    + Freight                                     50
    Total Cost                                  250
    Goods are receipted as follows:
    1) Main Product 10 items @ 2 USD = 20
        Freight 10/100*50                           5
        Total GR Accrual                          25                                    
    2) Main Product 20 items @ 2 USD = 40
        Freight 20/100*50                          10
        Total GR Accrual                          50
    Upon Invoice Verfiication (MIRO), following are the results.
    Main Product
    Item 10 @ 2 = 20 
    Item 20 @ 2 =40
    MIRO booking for main product is itemized. This is correct.
    However for freight,
    Freight
    Item 30 @ 2 = 60
    MIRO booking for Freight is sum-up instead of being itemised. Is this a SAP standard funtionality. We prefer an itemised booking of freight also.
    Appreciate your reply.
    Thanks
    Robert

    HI,
    The system sums up the planned delivery costs at MIRO stage.
    I would guess that you are using the "GR based IV" flag on the PO and that is why you are getting a line per GR for the actual items themselves. But this flag does not affect the delivery cost conditions and so I am sorry but they will always be a total rather than separate lines.
    This is not ideal fro your situation but that is the way it works and to change this would be a MAJOR modification and definitely NOT worth the effort and risk.
    Steve B

  • Currency conversion issue for condition type

    Hello,
    I am creating two invoice document.
    1. Customs Invoice (ZCDS)
    2. Inter company invoice.(IVA)
    both the invoices should be similar. Same pricing procedure is used to create both the documents but in Customs invoice YUMU condition type is not getting converted whereas in IVA the condition type is getting converted. Can anyone tell me the possible reason for this?
      ZCDS
    IVA
    Regards,
    Jagjeet

    Hi Jagjeet,
    For IVA invoice type -(For condition type- YUMU)
    Below highlighted part of code is changing KSTEU from 'E' to 'C' for IVA invoice using std prog RVIVAUFT.
    For ZCDS Invoice Type -(For condition type- YUMU)
    Program RVIVAUFT is not called since ZCDS is not trigerried using Output type unlike IVA.
    Hence KSTEU is not getting updated from 'E' to 'C' in case of ZCDS.
    To solve your problem write code in User exit - userexit_pricing_copy to change  konv-ksteu to 'C' for YUMU condition type at runtime.This will definately solve your problem.This will ensure you get correct/same condition value for IVA and ZCDS...:)
    Regards,
    Vikas Mulay.

  • Invoice blocked for qty reason, but condition type deleted from the PO

    Hi Gurus,
    I have an LIV with R block in the header level. The invoice contains a line item for planned delivery cost condition type FRB1 which was entered manually during PO creation.(no condition record exists for FRB1). But the condition type FRB1 is missing from the PO line item now and when trying to release the invoice block via MRBR, it gives the message that the 'list is incomplete'.
    The PO is not having any release strategy and the invoice number is available in the index table RBKP_BLOCKED.
    The condition type FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-triggering the pricing. The business needs the pricing to be carried out on the shipment date from the vendors site. So when the vendor issues the goods, the same is updated in the pricing date field in PO line item and the pricing is re-triggered. So in this case the happenings were in the below sequence.
    1. Buyer created PO with manually entered FRB1 condition type.
    2. Invoice posted against the PO.
    3. When vendor has shipped the goods, the ASN updates the pricing date in the PO and carries out re-pricing. The FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-pricing as no condition record existed.
    4. Goods receipt posted
    5. Trying to release the invoice in MRBR, but the system gives the message that the list is incomplete.
    Please suggest how to go ahead with the resolution of the issue.
    Regards,
    Greg

    Gregory Mathews wrote:
    Hi Gurus,
    >
    > I have an LIV with R block in the header level. The invoice contains a line item for planned delivery cost condition type FRB1 which was entered manually during PO creation.(no condition record exists for FRB1). But the condition type FRB1 is missing from the PO line item now and when trying to release the invoice block via MRBR, it gives the message that the 'list is incomplete'.
    > The PO is not having any release strategy and the invoice number is available in the index table RBKP_BLOCKED.
    >
    > The condition type FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-triggering the pricing. The business needs the pricing to be carried out on the shipment date from the vendors site. So when the vendor issues the goods, the same is updated in the pricing date field in PO line item and the pricing is re-triggered. So in this case the happenings were in the below sequence.
    >
    > 1. Buyer created PO with manually entered FRB1 condition type.
    > 2. Invoice posted against the PO.
    > 3. When vendor has shipped the goods, the ASN updates the pricing date in the PO and carries out re-pricing. The FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-pricing as no condition record existed.
    > 4. Goods receipt posted
    > 5. Trying to release the invoice in MRBR, but the system gives the message that the list is incomplete.
    >
    > Please suggest how to go ahead with the resolution of the issue.
    >
    > Regards,
    > Greg
    Hi Greg,
    Are there any a/c entries showing in GR a/c doc for this cond type? I think it could be a bug when you run the ASN Idoc. Try to un-check Delete indicator for FRB1 which would stop it getting deleted.
    Regards
    Shiva

  • Unlimited MIRO invoice allowed for GR based IV item

    Hi,
    I have a problem where the user keeps posting invoices against incorrect Service ENtry Sheets(SES). The user wants to know if there is a message which can be given at this point.
    PO item is a service
    The flag for GR based IV is set.
    The following processing has been done.
    PO qty: 45600
    1) SES1 - Amount 11400
    2) GR1 against SES1
    Dr      expense            11,400
    Cr      GR/IR Clearing     -11,400
    3) IR1 - Amount 4,998.15 against SES1
    Cr      Vendor          -4,998.15
    Dr     GR/IR Clearing     11,400
    Cr     Expense          -6,401.85
    At this point, the GR/IR clearing account has been cleared and the expense account entries have also been nullified.
    So the effective posting in FI will be as follows:
    Cr      Vendor          -4,998.15
    Dr      expense            (11,400-6401.85) = 4998.15
    At this point, if I try to create an invoice using MIRO wrt the same PO item, it still allows me to post an invoice of 6401.85 as the difference between the GR amount and the IR amount still exists.
    The invoice is not even set for blocking.
    However, FI wise, there is no pending invoice for this item.
    The users do not want this scenario to be allowed. Can anyone suggest how this can be prevented.
    If I do post this invoice at this stage, it creates the following FI entries.
    Cr     Vendor          - 6401.85
    Dr     Expense            6401.85
    After this, any further invoices on this PO item are blocked for payment.
    Please help as this scenario keeps on occuring for service items and becomes a mess for items having multiple SES.
    Let me know if further inputs are required.
    Thanks!
    PM

    Hello Sudhir,
    Thanks for your response. However, in this case, the quantity has not been exceeded.
    If you notice, the IRd amount(4998.15) is still less than the GRd amount(11400) in the PO history.
    However, the postings have been cleraed at the FI document level.
    The checks that you have mentioned get hit only after the IR amount crosses the GR amount of 11400 and then th einvoice goes into payment block. Which is correct.
    Please let me know if you have further suggestions or if I have understood your response incorrectly.
    Thanks!
    PM

  • Sales Order - pull conditions for an item

    Hi all,
    I have a Sales order with one item in it. When I go to this item in VA03 I see several tabs like SalesA, SalesB,.....Conditions,..... Now when I click the 'Conditions' tab I see all the Conditions for this Item. I want to pull this conditions information. I have the KNUMV value for this sales order so I can go to the table KONV where all the conditions are stored and with help of KNUMV and item number can I get all the conditions. BUT...
    My question is there are some Conitions which have more lines below them(in blue color) like Gross Value, Net value,..... This information is not stored in the KONV table. For example in Conditons I have a condition Z7UP like
    <b>Z7UP</b>    Unit Price    0.000   Eur   ....
               Gross value   1.5     Eur   ....
               Net value     0.0     Eur   ....
    The lines Gross value and Net value are not stored in the table KONV. Does anyone know which tables maintain this information. I need to get that information too.... Waiting for your replies..........
    Message was edited by: Raju Boda

    HI Rich,
    I looked to KONP and KOND but of no use. I dont have any entries in KOND and for KONP the key is KNUMH which I dont have. But I looked at all the entries in KONP but it seems this table doesnt have the information I am looking for.
    I debugged VA03 for one sales order to look from where exactly it is pulling this data. I found that when I came across the function modules
    PRICING_SUBSCREEN_PBO
    PRICING_SUBSCREEN_SET_DATA
    the required data is obtained automatically into structure XKOMV the movement I enter into these function modules in debugging mode.
    I'm still unable to understand from where the system is pulling this data.
    Any ideas please help. Thanks

  • Error in Viewing Draft Invoice for Service Item Type

    Hi
    I am facing an error in viewing draft service invoice.
    I am saving a document (PO/ Invoice)  as draft.
    When i am trying to view from document draft list by double-clicking it. the Visual Studio Just-in-Time debugger opens up stating SAP Business One.exe encounterd an problem and by clicking NO button the SAP closes.
    Note: The Invoice is created for Service Items, it is working perfect with Item.
    This is urgent - any help
    I am using 2005 B PL 05 with SQL 2005 on Win 2003 SP1
    Indrajit

    Do you have any Addon's.
    As you seek answers here please post a support message to SAP Support
    https://websmp205.sap-ag.de/sbo-message-old

  • EDI invoice failed for Service- multiple tax code at service item level

    Hi Guys,
    Please understand below scenarios, it is very critical to our client.
    purchase order has 3 parent
    line item which having the 3 services with tax code (P1-P1-P1 and P2-P2-P2 and (P2-P1-C1)
    (P1=10%, P2=10% and C1=10%)
    PO Outbound Idoc -
    Similar tax codes(P1-P1-p1 and P2-P2-P2) - Carries total tax amount and
    tax rate at parent level also it carries indvidual service line item
    tax amount and tax rate at service item level
    Mulitple tax codes(P2-P1-C1)- Carries only total tax amount at parent
    level and no tax rate at parent level. It carries indvidual service
    line item tax amount and tax rate at service item level
    SES Outbound Idoc -
    Similar tax codes(P1-P1-p1 and P2-P2-P2) - Carries total tax amount at
    parent level segment and tax rate at parent item level also it carries
    indvidual service line item tax amount and tax rate at service item
    level
    Mulitple tax codes(P2-P1-C1)- Carries only total tax amount at parent
    level and no tax rate at parent level. It carries indvidual service
    line item tax amount and tax rate at service item level
    But while creating the invoice for parent line item which includes 3
    services, it carries correct tax amount(as per PO and SESR) but it is
    asking for tax rate at parent level not at service item level.
    It is working fine for similar tax code at service line item (e.g P1-P1-p1 for 3 services or P2-P2-P2 for all 3 services) but when we use the combination of tax code or multiple tax code at service line items (e.g. P2-P1-C1), the inbound Idoc gets failed.
    Expectation - How EDI invoice posted for mulitple Services under one parent line item which having multiple tax codes at service item level
    Thanks
    Sanjay
    9930851236

    This is an ongoing problem with lots of clients - did anyone solve it ?

  • GR-based invoice verification for item category SERVICE

    Hi SAP Masters,
    I will be very appreciate if you will help me to solve problem related with PO for Services (item category = SERVICE).
    When I try to create this kind of purchase order the indicator GR_Based IV become assigned and cannot be changed (field is not active). Is it possible to change this setting and create PO for service where  I will be able to save invoice before GR?
    If yes, please tell me where I can change this setting?

    Hi,
    No,
    You cannot change this setting, you HAVE to have GR based IV for service entry sheets.
    I really don't like the effect of the GR Based IV flag and so I always recommend against using it unless it is absolutely necessary. But in this case it is necessary and can't be switched off.
    Have you tried using materials for services (or free text) and "normal" POs, instead of service POs? that way you can have a simple GR instead of the two step GR for services and you can also have the GR based IV flag set OFF.
    Steve B

  • Cancellation of ERS Invoice for return Items

    Hi all,
    How to cancel the ERS Invoice for Return Item POs?  
    For normal items, we used to post a GR with 122 movement type and run the MRRL.  But for Return Item POs we are unable to do that.   Is there any other way?
    Rgds, Mallik

    Please see the below help from SAP
    The system determines the invoice amount for this ordering transaction from the prices entered in the order, the terms of payment, the tax information and the delivery quantity entered in the goods receipt.
    Credit memos can also be created using ERS: if an invoice has already been posted for a goods receipt and goods have since been returned, the system automatically generates a credit memo for the returned quantity during the next ERS run.

  • Proforma Invoice for Excisable item.

    Hi everyone........
    can any one tell me how to created a proforma invoice for excisable items.
    Does A/P down payment or A/R Down payment satisfy my requirement?
    Regards,
    Meghana

    Hi,
    You can make performa invoice at  A/R down payment Request .
    Design PLD as per your requirment .
    Regards
    Deepak Tyagi
    Edited by: Deepak Tyagi on Feb 14, 2011 8:42 AM

  • Invoice receipt does not include tax for each item in PO history

    Hi gurus,
                we received 2 items against a PO
      netprice-- tax-----total
    item 1--> 9010--
    100
    item 2-->205--
    25
                          total GR amount           :      125
    invoice received for $125
    but if i see in the PO history the tax for both items is added up and shown for only one item.for 2nd item it shows only netprice,it doesn't show tax .
    is it a config setting thats affecting this or any other setting that need to be looked at
    The PO history looks like this:
    for item 1----
    for item 2)    .
    GR--100--
    25
    Inv. Rec.-----105--
    20
    invoice verification is a new concept to me,I would appreciate any suggestions about the settings tobe looked at for rectifying this?
    Thanks,
    Chris T

    hi Chris T
    i think this not a config issue. i think the MM people when they do GR/IR they adding all tax to the net pice .
    to solve this we can cancel that GR/IR and post with right net price
    thanks,
    subbu

Maybe you are looking for