Invoice posting issue

hi
I have created one PO and two different (two times) GRN done for same po however at the time tof inoice posting (MIRO) with refeence to first DC, system has display full qty of grn (sum of two different dc qty).
can you help the same issue.
reg
mrs

hI,
You would have posted the grn for the PO with the GR Based invoicxe verification check in the PO.If the PO is checked with the box GR based invoice verification in the invoice tab, then system will show you the partial GRs happed with DC in the MIRO screen when referenced.
Refgards,

Similar Messages

SRM 7.0 Invoice posting issues, validation

Hi Experts ,
We are configuring SRM7.0 with ECC6 ( Ehp4) having Classic Scenario .
1. In Std SRM , we can post Invoice both ways
With ref to PO
W/o ref to PO.
We don't want to post Invoice w/o refernce to PO. How it can be stoped ? I want system should even, not allow user to post invoice w/o ref to PO ( Should give error).
2. We had NOT actiacted "Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Account" in ECC Invoice Config. But in SRM, If we post any invoice w.r.t. PO and add some extra line item, than system do not Stop me , and just give message that "Invoice 80000000112 is created, but not forwarded to Accounting " and its ststus shows "Waiting from preceeding document".
How it can be stoped ? I want system should even, not allow user to post invoice w/o ref to PO ( Should give error)?
3. We are using GR based IV in PO.
If for any PO , GR is not done
User tried to post the invoice in SRM, system gives error message that "Precessing document req for invoice is not availble", but if I POST it , system proceeds it with green color message "Invoice 80000000113 is created, but not forwarded to Accounting " and its status shows "Waiting from preceeding document"
If PO Qty = 100, GR= 20, IR =100 Qty
System 1st give error Message
Line 1 : Qty too high ( Tol Limit of 0.00 AUD exceeded)
Line 1 : Value too high ( Tol Limit of 0.00 AUD exceeded)
And after that if user POST it, then system just do not Stop me , and just give message that "Invoice 80000000057 is created, but not forwarded to Accounting " and its status shows "To be Corrected Manually". How this can be stopped ?
I believe , by using DOC check or ITEM Check BADi this can be done , Can anyone suggest there is another way ?
Thanks
NAP

Thanks Ranjan,
1. No there is no any Portal Link for Invoice w/o PO. In the Portal for SRM BP, same single link displays from which we can post both Invoice w.ref to PO and w/o PO.
2. Since we do not want user to make mistake. System should stop him and do not allow if PO is not refered or IR Qty > GR Qty.
Do anyone have any inputs.
Thanks
NAP

SRM Invoice posting issue

Hi Experts,
We are working on SRM 5.0 . Few days back new support pack 'SAPKIBKT14' was implemented.
After this we are trying to post the invoice based on PO in SRM. we entered the PO number and clicked on 'Insert',
then it should display the item details as well as 'Invoicing party' & 'Vendor' details. But here in my case
'Invoicing party' & 'Vendor' details are not displaying, only items details are displaying.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Chandu

Hi,
The invoice is created in SRM but it doesn't replicate, Have you checked the inbound IDOC in your backend (Tx we05)
In the status segment you should see the error.
I hope this help
Best regards

Limit Order Shopping Cart Invoice posting issue

Hello Experts,
I am not able to post invoice for LIMIT ORDER SC(I am using Extended classic scenario); using MIRO when i enter PO no. in the specified field ; in the line item both the amount & quantity appears as zero. and it does not allow to change or edit. Ideally it should allow the posting of invoice but with block payment.
The same thing i tried for "Describe requirement SC" and it allowed me for posting invoice even without GR/Confirmation.

Hi,
You can enter the Invoice, remove the GR/IR based invoice indicator from the invoice tab of the PO line item.
thanks
Padhi

Wrong Vendor Invoice Posting Due To Wrong Excise Tax Code

Hi:
We have created a Purchase Order as per below:
Qty     10
Price     100
Value     1000
Excsie 10%     0
Cess     0
SECess     0
Value+Excise     1000
VAT 5%     50
ValueExciseVAT     1050
(Please note that the PO was to be created in the following fashion as the Material was excisable)
Qty     10
Price     100
Value     1000
Excsie 10%     100
Cess     2
SECess     1
Value+Excise     1103
VAT 5%     55.15
ValueExciseVAT     1158.15
We did the Goods Receipt and the FI Document is as follows:
24340000     Paper Stock     BSX     1,000.00
13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00-
We did the Vendor Invoice Posting as follows:
100183     SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA)     KBS     1,050.00-
13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00
24638100     VAT Recoverable     JP5     50.00
The Material was issued to Cost Centre
Later at the time of Excise Invoice posting, we came to know that the Tax Code in the Purchase Order was wrong. Here in our case, we have created separate Tax Code based on Excise Percentage. For example, V1 for VAT 5%, E1 for VAT %+Excise 10.3%.
To post the excise invoice, we changed the Tax Code in the Purchase Order and did the Excise Posting as follows:
24820020     CENVAT Inp SHEcess     1.00
24820000     CENVAT Inp BED     100.00
24820010     CENVAT InpEcess     2.00
13113920     CENVAT clearing     103.00-
My Question:
a. Is this the correct way?
b. What about the following FI Entries which got generated when we do the MIRO with actual Tax Code:
100183     SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA)     KBS     1,158.15-
13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00
13113920     CENVAT clearing     JI1     100.00
13113920     CENVAT clearing     VS9     2.00
13113920     CENVAT clearing     JI6     1.00
24638100     VAT Recoverable     JP5     55.15
Please guide.
Regards,

Thanks Sanjoo for the reply.
Here my worry is the all the postings have been made in SAP in Production Client.
The User has already done the postings for MIRO & J1IEX without informing to us, and the volume of transactions is huge.
We are in the back-log mode and at this stage, we can't go for any reversal . I am Just exploring the alternatives.
Our MM & FI Users are little bit smart, when ever they do some mistake, they simply say "we will pass a JV" and we are not able to educate them that the JV is not a Solution. Please guide.
Regards,
PK

Outbound delivery date in June and customer invoice post in July,tax rate?

Hi Experts
tax rate (June)=22%
tax rate (july)=24%
issue is Outbound delivery date in June and customer invoice post in July,so sytem taking tax rate =24% instead of 22%.Because outbound delivery is happened in June.
Please let me know that,
1)how system picking tax rate on base like billing date or service render date or ...?
2)how to take tax rate (june)=22% in July posting.
regards
sachin

Tax Rate is picked based on the pricing date.
You need to check with your SD collegue to configure the pricing date to be equal to outbound delivery date to pick the outbound delivery date based tax rates.
Regards,
Gaurav

F-28 incoming Invoice Posting Discount Splitting

Hi All,
I am using BDC for F-28 T Code to post incoming Invoice posting
but the issue is while posting the discount amount if i send 60 Rs through file it is splitting into 30 and 30
Not exactly 50-50
I am unable to get on what basis the amount is splitting.
I hvae to asssign Cost and Profit Center to the Discount amount .
But how many parts the Dicount amount is splitting is th issue.
Pls Help Me.
regards
Venu Madhav

pls. send u r code if possible..
Thanks,
Mahesh Kumar.

Service PO with Freight/ Insurance Condition- Invoice posting

Hi,
I'm using ECC6.0 version. I'm getting one problem in External Services Procurement.
Issue is:
1. Created a Service PO. Item Detail level, maintaines 1 text service with 10 Qty @ 50 INR.
2. In PO item Conditions tab, maintained Insurance condition (which is created by copying Frt. Condition FRB1) with say Rs. 100/-. Actually this should be levied on the overall item level at item overview Qty (i.e. 1 AU).
3. I made Service Entry, Acceptance.3.
At the time of Invoice posting, when I choose Goods/Services+ Plannd Del. costs, system proposing 5,000 ( 10 qty x 100 inr), instead of showing 100 inr. i.e. system proposing sub item qty times insurance.
Is there any setting to control this price?
Regards,
Kanth

Hi Sujit,
We can't maintain it as Header Condition because for service PO just like other POs, some times we may maintain more than 1 item which covers different Rates.
Please check my scenario
Has anybody got similar problem?

Problem with invoice posting

Hi .. i,m facing an issue with intercompany Invoice posting .
I'm having delivery note as a reference to that invoice but im getting error message that delivery note doesnot exist..
i have entered correct delivery note..
how this can b overcome?
Thanks and regards..
Manoj

hi,
for having del. note as ref in MIRO, first you must have entered the same del. note while making GR (MIGO), then only that is possible.
Have you done that,
other wise PO ref is the best & will work anyway
Regards
AK

Invoice posting - set document date as baseline date

Hi Expert!
I have issue regardig invoice posting.
When invoice posting transactions are done, the baseline date in the transaction is changing due to unknown reasons. The baseline date should not change and should be the document date. This in turn is having effects on the culculation of the due date for the payment terms.
In this case, i would like to make the document date as the default baseline date and remove the option of changing the baseline date. Please guide me on how to do it step by step.. Please also advise step by step how can i do that in transaction MIRO, FB60, FV60, FB65 and FV65..
Thanks..

prashant,
let say i have 3 company codes but i want to set the document date as the default for baseline date only for 2 company codes, how? If i tick on document date in the path u've given, will it be affected to all of company codes?
Where can i check for the payment terms against company code? Because payment terms in the path u've given seems like different than what is being using in the PO currently..
In the path there are 0001, 0002 and 0003 but payment terms which are being using in the PO are K160, K162....
Please advise..

Incorrect Cash Discount info was called during the Invoice Posting in FB01

Hi,
I'm having an issue where when I post the Invoice via FB01 using a non-default payment term for a specific supplier, FB01 seems to be replacing the Cash Discount information base on the supplier default payment term. I have tried to debug and suspect it was due to the FM# FI_CHANGE_PAYMENT_CONDITIONS.
It happens whenever there is a payment method insert in the FB01 transaction during the invoice posting. If the payment method was left blank, there will be no issue on the cash discount.
I saw that there is a fix from SAP for OSS Note 1314271 - Discount days not adjusted after changing Payment term. This fix added a new statement into the FM# shown as bold at the statement below:
    IF i_newsklin NE i_oldsklin OR i_zbdreq = char_x
         OR I_OLDZLSCH NE I_ZLSCH.                                "Note1314271
                      CONCATENATE 'S' status INTO status.
    ENDIF.
In layman term, below will be the summary of the coding above:
IF NewCashDiscount NE OldCashDiscount OR TermOfInstallmentPayment = u2018Xu2019
     OR OldPaymentMethod NE NewPaymentMethod
      CONCATENATE 'S' status INTO status. (No idea what is this statement trying to achieve)
ENDIF
Kindly share with me if you have experienced this before.
Your advice is very much appreciated.
Thanks,
David
Edited by: DAVID LIM on May 20, 2010 4:46 AM

Hi Shashi
Cash Discount amount can be modified manually?
Go to the 'Cash Discount' Tab and type the correct discount. The difference may be a result of rounding differences.
Hope this is useful!
Thanks & Regards
Fede

Exchange Rate date for Invoice posting for Slovak Republic

Hi,
We have a requirement wherein for Slovak Republic, Invoice should pick up ( at the time of Invoice Posting) the exchange rate from the Delivery Note date and not the Invoice Posting Date. This is applicable for all vendors which have a Slovak Republic VAT Registration number. I suppose this is some country specific requirement for Slovak Reublic.
Do we have to apply some Notes to achieve this functionality. Any pointers to this issue is highly appreciated.
Regards
Anupam

SO VBRK-KURRF (exchange rate for FI) is taken from "pricing date" in standard?
Are you 100% sure? :
FIrst of all: there is no pricing date (PRSDT) on invoice header level
Second: I`ve got information from FI that VBRK-KURRF is taken from posting (billing date) VBRK-FKDAT
I have found also programs, there is provided folloving calculation formula:
LV60AA90
Currency conversion (WAVWR is in local currency so far)
        ACTDATE = VBRK-KURRF_DAT.
        IF ACTDATE IS INITIAL.
          ACTDATE = VBRP-PRSDT.
        ENDIF.
        DA_WAVWR_HW = VBRP-WAVWR.
        DA_WAVWR_KW00 = WAVWR_KW00.
        DA_WAVWR_PCVP = WAVWR_PCVP.
LV60A036
Determine date
    IF vbrk-kurrf_dat IS INITIAL.
      ld_kurrf_dat = vbrk-fkdat.
    ELSE.
      ld_kurrf_dat = vbrk-kurrf_dat.
    endif.
So what is the verdict?

Invoice cancellation issue!!

Hi All,
I have a inovice cancellation issue. A PO was created in the year 2007 & an inovice was posted for
the same. The tax rate at that time, when the PO was created & the invoice posted was 6% but now the tax rate is 5% and when I try to cancel the same inovice, system doesn't allow me to do so as there is difference between the total amount of the invoice which was posted in 2007 & the reversal document because of the difference in the tax rate.
Is there anyway by making the FI adjustment that I can reverse the inovice document.
Thanks,
Swati.

Hi,,
You cannot reverse the invoice document for the year 2007.
You are in 2008, FI people will not allow and moreover is
Posting period is closed , it is difficult to reopen.
solution: Please check whether the vendor is supplying the material in this financial year if so you can adjust the amount in the current invocie
G.Ganesh Kumar

Duplicate invoice posting due to archived accounting documents

Hi,
Duplicate invoice posting is allowing against the below two Invoice reference nou2019s
In transaction MIRO.
00082 and 00072.
After investigation I have found that these invoice reference nou2019s are used in 2002 for accounting documents 3300130419 and 3300135574 and these two documents are archived, and found that these accounting entries are missing in the table BKPF and existing in the table BSIP.
We donu2019t want to allow the system to post duplicate invoices (For Example: against 00082 and 00072 Invoice reference Nos.)
Could you please look into this

Hi Jurgan!
Thanks for the reply,
We are using ECC6,
Support pack : SAPKH60013
Settings for Duplicate Invoice Check In Vendor Master is correct
Customization setting OMRDC transaction, tick mark for invoice reference no. only
If all the cited characteristics match, the system displays a
customizable message. M8462 (if logistics invoice documents are found) or M8108 (if accounting documents are found).
I have ensured that message M8108 (if accounting documents are found) is maintained as an error message in OMRM.
Still system is allowing duplicate invoices for the reference nos. 00082 and 00072.
For other reference Nos. which are previously used for other documents, system issues error message successfully.
I dont want to delete archived accounting doc. and if I maintaind BKPF entris of this archived doc manually it will create probelm in FI.
is this happen due to life span of secondory index of archived accounting doc. is completed ?.
Please Help
Many Thanks
Vikas

Duplicated Invoice Posted to Accounting

Hello All,
I got an issue with Duplicated invoices.
For one delivery 2 invoices created out of which one is Duplicate.
For other delivery 4 Invoices created out of which 3 are Duplicates.
The Biggest problem is that
1. All 6 invoices posted to accounting.
2. the duplicated invoices are not there in the Data base. When we try to check in SE16N VBRK we are getting Document does not exist problem.
Now the issue is to find out how it is happened and we need to reverse the accounting entries posted to duplicated invoices.
My Analysis:
SAP Notes OSS 12934-Duplicated Invoices, 152051. These are not helping
Could any body help me on this issue.
Best Regards

Hi,
Thanks for Response.
Critical thing is that the accounting documents exist for those invoices which are not in data base now.
We can able to see the invoice number in FBL5N but the invoice is not there in SAP data base.
As Invoices posted to accounting the customer receivables doubled for one delivery and 4 times for other.
When we try to check form accounting document also but the system throwing error document does not exist.
Hello Raghu,
I checked in Short dump no system messages exist.
Regards,
SASi

Invoice posting issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for