Invoice Verification issue

Hello all,
I got some requirement from my client as below:
1) As of now, the invoicing party is modifiable field during invoice verification i.e. MIRO. How to make the invoicing field non-modifiable during MIRO.
2) Unplanned delivery cost field is active for selection. There is no upper limit on unplanned delivery cost field. Even amount greater than PO value can be booked. I need to restict this like tolerance limit of around $100.
Please help me on urgency.
Thanks,
JK

Hi.
Use TCode OLMRLIST and input followwing information:
Transaction: MIRO
Screen Variant: 0001_000_0150
Program: SAPLFDCB
Screen: 150
Modify the Field INVFO-LIFRE as invisible. This will solve your first query.
For 2nd query I have got a work around solution for you.
1) Configure Transaction Key UPF - Unplanned delivery costs to a G/L Account.
2) Configure Postings of Unplanned delivery costs under MM - LIV using the following path.
SPRO --> Materials Management --> Logistics Invoice Verification --> Incoming Invoice --> Configure How Unplanned delivery costs are posted
Here you assign ID 2 - Different G/L Line
3) Create a validation as follows:
Prerequisite - BKPF-BLART = 'RE' AND BSEG-HKONT = ' G/L you configured in step 1'
Check - BSEG-WRBTR <= 'Amount which you want to restrict'
Message - Create an Error Message for it.
This will resolve your problem.
Regards,
Sanjay

Similar Messages

Invoice Verification - Issue/ Documents Posted to Dummy PC ( Frieght Cost)

HI friends,
I was observed that Users are posting the freight for indirect PO directly to Freight GL, it goes to Dummy Profit Center. The actual process is Freight cost which is not captured in PO & is with Invoice has to enter in unplanned delivery cost.
Is it correct
Venkat

Ideally, you could plant for a freight amount and create a accrual condition type for freight and plan for materials through MEK1. This will automatically post the freight during goods receipt and post the credit to the accrual account, where you can book the actual freight amount from vendors. This will also help you get a correct PPV.

GR based Invoice Verification issue

Hi,
In PO, GR based IV ticked. Did GR and cancelled. Now system is allowing to post invoice without GR. No error observed.
Please let me know is it standard SAP behavior that it will allow to post invoice (after first GR) without a GR.
Regards,
Nagaraj

Hi
Yes this is standard and allowed as the previous post suggests. GR Based IV simply means that the system will present you an invoice line item for every uncleared GR line item, rather than rolling all the GR's up into a single invoice line item for the combined Qty and $. Allows you to clear individual GR's. We use it for some suppliers where there are lots of GR's, for varying quantities, and the vendor invoices us for each load they delivery. Makes reconciliation easier.
There are various messages you can set that would prevent this, such as M8 504 (Quantity invoiced greater than goods receipt quantity). If you've posted a GR, then reversed it, this message will prevent an invoice being posted.
Cheers

Regarding invoice verification issue

hi Sap Gurus,
how can do MIRO without P.O.
please i need your feed back.
Thanking you
from
Praveer

hi,
Go to MIRO,
and you can directly enter the assignment or postings to G/L account tab or on the material tab and assign the vendor at the item overview and then post the document...
SPRO settings req. is :
SPRO >> MM >> LIV >> Here incoming invoice >> Direct posting to G/L account and material allowed...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Good issue and returns in invoice verification.

Hello.
We work with scheduling agreements for procurement. The field "goods-receipt-based invoice verification" is marked in all items as we want to verify each good receipt in invoice verification. Returns are posted against good issue (using MBRL).
In this scenario we want to verify separately good issue items and return items in invoice verification.
By example:
Good issue: 100 st
Return: 20 st (mbrl indicating the good issue)
In MIRO (invoice verification) the system shows one item of 80 st. We want that the system shows one debit item of 100 st and one credit item of 20 st.
Is this possible?
Thanks.

To achieve this requiremnt please post the MIRO with reference to Delivery note in place of PO.

Excise is not calculate in invoice verification

Dear All,
I have one issue.
We have create purchase order for project with account assignment category Q.
We put excise (10.30) & Vat 15% in purchase order.
In purchase order all value calculate properly. Good Receipt created against purchase order.
Now we create invoice verification againat purchase order.
but at time of invoice verfication creatoin excise value in not calculate properly in invoice verification, only 15% vat calculate in invoice verification.
All excise detail(J1id) has been maintain for material & vendor master and i have also check tax code in FTXP. All are well maintain.
We have capture excise invoice at the time of good receipt creation.
But Excise value is not calculate
Regards,
Mahesh Wagh

Hi,
If the excise invoice is not posted (Part-II), then it will not flow in MIRO. Pls check same.
You may even check whether the capter id assigned to the material is extended to new excise calculation period.
Regards,

Same nr range in Logistics Invoice Verification for the MM and FI document

I customised Logistics Invoce verification (on ECC6) with the same nr range for MM and FI. That were done by changing the nr range of doc type RE (in FI) to nr range 52 andcreated the nr range for the company code for fiscal year 2007 and 2008 (our fiscal year 2008 start 1.10.07) and made it external nr assignment. In MM I changed RD and RS to a new range 05 to which I assigned the nr range 5200000000 to 5299999999 (internally assigned). For the vendor consignment I created a new document type and assign that to nr range 51 (as the original invoice verification settings).
This process works quite nice with the same document nr for MM and FI, however I still do have a problem. (I work through the article on above as per FI Expert issue of Sept 07, but even in there my problem was not mentioned.
If I do an invoice verification for previous period with price changes on the system, Sap want to post 2 accounting docs (1 for the previous month - on which I did have stock and 1 for current month - one which I did not have any stock). The system only send 1 document nr for FI who needs 2 doc nrs. I now get the error message that I must use a document in the nr range 5200000000 and 529999999.
How do I rectify this or can I not use this functionality if we allow backdating to the previous period
Regards
Anna-Marie Robson

I customised Logistics Invoce verification (on ECC6) with the same nr range for MM and FI. That were done by changing the nr range of doc type RE (in FI) to nr range 52 andcreated the nr range for the company code for fiscal year 2007 and 2008 (our fiscal year 2008 start 1.10.07) and made it external nr assignment. In MM I changed RD and RS to a new range 05 to which I assigned the nr range 5200000000 to 5299999999 (internally assigned). For the vendor consignment I created a new document type and assign that to nr range 51 (as the original invoice verification settings).
This process works quite nice with the same document nr for MM and FI, however I still do have a problem. (I work through the article on above as per FI Expert issue of Sept 07, but even in there my problem was not mentioned.
If I do an invoice verification for previous period with price changes on the system, Sap want to post 2 accounting docs (1 for the previous month - on which I did have stock and 1 for current month - one which I did not have any stock). The system only send 1 document nr for FI who needs 2 doc nrs. I now get the error message that I must use a document in the nr range 5200000000 and 529999999.
How do I rectify this or can I not use this functionality if we allow backdating to the previous period
Regards
Anna-Marie Robson

Same nr range in Invoice Verification (MIRO) and FI document

Dear all can you please help to solve this issue?
We would like to have the same number range for invoice verification and for financial document, what we have to do?
Regards
Marco

Please follow the steps as below
Step 1. Maintain FI document number range. Use transaction OMR4 and go to Number range for document types in FI. Select the company code for which you want to create the new number range interval and click on the change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert interval button on top of the screen.for example, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 5299999999. Don't forget to set the external number range check box (Ext).
Step 2. Assign FI number range to FI document types. The second step is to assign the number range created in step 1 to the FI document type for invoices. Again use transaction OMR4 and go to Document type. Double-click on the document type, which you are using for LIV invoices. In my example, I used the SAP standard document type RE. In the number range field, assign the new number range interval 52
Step 3. Maintain MM document number ranges. Use transaction OMRJ and click on change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert button at the top of the screen. For MM documents, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 5299999999. For the internal number range assignment, do not set the external number range check box (Ext).
Step 4. Update MM number range assignment. The last step is to assign the MM number range to your MM transaction via IMG menu path Materials Management>Logistics Invoice Verification>Incoming Invoice>Number Assignment>Maintain Number Assignments for Logistic Documents>Transaction Assign Number ranges. Two transactions are available. LIV contains the following two internal transactions that are used for the MM document number determination:
RD: manual invoice entry (MIRO)
RS: cancel, reverse invoice (MR8M), evaluated receipt settlement (MRRL), EDI invoice receipt, invoicing plan (MRIS), and revaluation (MRNB).
You need to update the number range interval for transaction RD.
hope now that things r clear
reward accordingly

Excise Invoice verification

Hi
I read in SAP HELP like this in country version india on excise inv verification.
" Entering and Verifying Invoices
Follow the standard invoice verification procedure, but select Calculate tax on the Vendor Items screen. The system proposes the deductible excise duty items in the invoice document."
pls tell me where to do this in MIRO.
regards
B Shar

i thnk u are using manual excise value in MM pricing procedure and using tax code or condition records to get the bed ecess and other tax
hope u have checked in PO that value for all taxes are coming unere invoice tab in ur tax procedure for your PO
if this is ok then check if u have set condition default in under spro Maintain Excise Defaults
and also have done configurast in for ur Classify Condition Types
do this setting correctlly ur issue will be solved

Excise and Invoice verification

Hi
During Invoice verification the system is generating error message: PART2 entry was not posted.
In J1iex it shows the status of IN Process.
During Posting in J1iex it issue message NO PART1 exist for availling credit.
How to resolve this so that it will book for invoice verification....i
Regards,
SAGAR

Hi
Run tcode J1I5 and update Part1 register.Use classification ROP.Once this is done then Post the Excise invoice in J1IEX and then perform MIRO
Regards
Sandeep

Scheduling Agreement invoice verification

Hi friends,
This is the issue I'm facing with my client
Buyer created the scheduling agreement and delivery lines.
item cost 2$ per piece
user received the material against scheduling agreement line item.
system generated the material document.
Due to wrong price in Scheduling agreement buyer updated the price form 2$ to 3 $
but when we are doing invoice verification system taking 2$ not 3$.
How to handle this situation.
Is it any way we can update material document price?
User want to do invoice verification for 3$.
Please suggest.

Hi Sunil..
Is it a GR Based INV Verification? If not GR based then there shd be no issue.
So the Buyer has already updated the SA to 3 $ or not yet.
Try to replicate the entire scenario in ur testing client and try to do update the SA
with new price and do a reversal of the material document and once again redo the GR and then follow on with IR.
Is IR Posted or not yet ?? If IR is posted the Material Doc will look for the price from IR not SA.
Regards
Balaji

Invoice Verification process with multiple payments

Please advise us on the Invoice Verification process in case of multiple payments required for single Quantity Purchase Order Lines. [ i.e. If the quantity of Purchase is 1 and we need to process multiple invoices involving partial amount of the PO value, we end up in decimal errors in many cases. ]
For e.g. we had a case were the Total PO amount was 7638, against quantity 1. A partial invoice was raised for amount 7545. We were unable to determine the exact quantity in the invoice document to derive the said amount. This was due to the limitation in the quantity field which is only supporting 3 decimals. Subsequent to this, we need to round off and also this caused problems in the next payment lot. The issue becomes more complicated when there is header discount , freight etc. specified in the PO Header Conditions.
This resulted in the discrepancy between Goods Receipt and Invoice Receipt Amounts for such POs.
Please throw us some light to tackle this issue as per the best practices available in SAP.
Also in this relation, Is it possible to enforce Quantity Tolerance in PO.

HI,
What you can do to over come such problem, is Put the Value Figure in Quantity field & Quantity in Net price field,
As the Qty is 1, The total Amount paid to vendor will be same & no Need of calculating decimal.
While making GRN, Put the actual Invoice value as qty.
Hope this serves the purpose.
Regards
Mascot

Invoice Verification MIRO

Dear All,
This is about invoice verification block after MIRO posting-
In PO we have set it as 2 way match, once the PO is equal to Invoice verification then the system should not put any payment block. But if it doesnt match the value of PO to IV then the system should put invoice verifcation block (R) in the accounting document.
Here, whatever we post that is whether the PO value is matching or not the invoice verification block (R) is appearing in the accounting document. Does any one gone through similar issue....
I want to know how this can happen?
Checked validations but nothing that sort appears.....is there a way to find out how this happens....
Thanks to all in advance.

Hello
I do not know of any BAPI. But you can set an automatic block up through your payment terms.
Check the following customizing path for this:
Financial Accounting
->Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable
   ->Business Transactions
     ->Incoming Invoices/Credit Memos
       ->Maintain Terms of Payment
Select the details for the payment term and check for the indicator there to set the default block key.
Hope this helps
Ray

OMRO - Invoice Verification triggered UMB

Hi all,
Currently i have one issue, at Miro i have posted the invoice verification for
Material no:                  779670-001
Price of PO:                  21.12 EUR
Unplanned delivery cost:41.83 EUR
And once i've done the posting, it will triggered
Transaction 1
Doc date: 12.12.2008
Debit: Good Receipt/IR: 21.12 EUR
Debit: Finished good   : 41.83 EUR
Credit: Acct Payable: 62.95 EUR.
But on different date, it will triggred
Transaction 2
Doc Date: 01.01.2009
Debit: Finished good: 41.83 EUR.
Credit: Gain/Loss Revaluation 41.83 EUR.
The issue is we don't know the transaction 2 occurs due to what issue and we found out it is from the OBYC UMB.
So we would like to know why this occurs.
Hope to hear from you all.
Thank you.
Kah Fei

Hi
Please check what is the price control in material master for material used in purchase order.
Did you enter any material in material tab field in IV for revaluation?
The entries showing are finished goods GL account - which means the price control will be S.
If you enter unplanned delivery costs for standard price/standard costing materials, then other account affected will be the account specified in UMB in OBYC
And also check if any revaluation document specified in OMR4 for transaction code MIRO. In case of standard price material if you do revaluation i hope separate documetn will be generated.
Thanks

SRM PO failed: Indicator for GR-based invoice verification used not allowed

Hi Friends,
I have an issue with a specific PO failed to transfer from SRM to ECC. We are in ECS scenario, SRM 5.0 Service level 7.0. We are in process of SP upgrade but this issue occured in Production system which is still in old SP level(SP 7.0).
when I check the App Monitor, I am see the following errors: but the status shows Auto_Completed
1. PO: Indicator for GR-based invoice verification used not allowed
2. PO: Instance XXXXXXXXXX of object type PurchaseOrder could not be changed
3. PurchOrder XXXXXXXXXX: Purchase order still contains faulty items
4. PO XXXXXXXX: Indicator for GR-based invoice verification used not allowed
I can see the PO copied over to ECC. but status in SRM PO shows 'Error in Process'.
BBP_PD for object PO shows: Created, complete, ordered, In Transfer to Execute, Change was Transmitted as Inactive status. Transfer Failed shows Active, Document completed, created.
I checked BP Maintain for the vendor and PO and its no different than other POs and Vendors except Vendor had 'Goods Receipt based Invoice Verification' indicator checked in SRM.
I tried to simulate the same Material, Vendor with GR-IV indicator both on and off, it works fine. Ofcourse this is in Quality box with SP 15 level.
So, I am not sure if SP level upgrade might help it or not? If there are any other means to test, please advise.
thanks
Rao

I was wondering how I could liquidate the PO by either creating a new PO or ??.
What you could do to revive the PO in question is that after the upgrade, and after a round of background jobs run for CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and BBP_GET_STATUS_2, ask the buyer to make a dummy change to the PO (for example, change the description of the PO) and order again. This would trigger the transfer to the backend again. And hopefully this time, no error would occur.

Invoice Verification issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for