OMRO - Invoice Verification triggered UMB

Hi all,
Currently i have one issue, at Miro i have posted the invoice verification for
Material no:                  779670-001
Price of PO:                  21.12 EUR
Unplanned delivery cost:41.83 EUR
And once i've done the posting, it will triggered
Transaction 1
Doc date: 12.12.2008
Debit: Good Receipt/IR: 21.12 EUR
Debit: Finished good   : 41.83 EUR
Credit: Acct Payable: 62.95 EUR.
But on different date, it will triggred
Transaction 2
Doc Date: 01.01.2009
Debit: Finished good: 41.83 EUR.
Credit: Gain/Loss Revaluation 41.83 EUR.
The issue is we don't know the transaction 2 occurs due to what issue and we found out it is from the OBYC UMB.
So we would like to know why this occurs.
Hope to hear from you all.
Thank you.
Kah Fei

Hi
Please check what is the price control in material master for material used in purchase order.
Did you enter any material in material tab field in IV for revaluation?
The entries showing are finished goods GL account - which means the price control will be S.
If you enter unplanned delivery costs for standard price/standard costing materials, then other account affected will be the account specified in UMB in OBYC
And also check if any revaluation document specified in OMR4 for transaction code MIRO. In case of standard price material if you do revaluation i hope separate documetn will be generated.
Thanks

Similar Messages

Document contains some order item more than once - invoice verification

Hi,
we have one cross company stock transfer process in which when a billing is created in SD side, an IDOC will be triggered automatically and create an invoice verification at the MM side.
The problem is some of our billing of this process having an IDOC application error that said.
Document contains same order item more than once
Message no. M8321
Diagnosis
Under the following circumstances, you can settle an order item in an invoice received via EDI more than once:
- Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification has been defined for the order item.
- The IDoc contains the delivery note numbers of the goods receipts.
System Response
If this is not the case, the system cancels posting of the IDoc.
Question:
1 - The funny thing is IDOC showing 51 IDOC error code message on status record of INVOIC. But the invoice verfication get created in PO history.
2 - I think this error is because we need to make the PO as GR-based Inverifcation. We have flagged it in Vendor master, and Info record, but this indicator is not flag automatically in the PO (and we cannot manually change the PO as this indicator is grey-out). How?
3 - how to solve this error?
Thanks

Once PO history is created, you cannot change the "GR-based-IV" flag. Two options are there before you.
1. Cancel all the GRs & Invoices posted in the STO then system will allow you to update the GR-based-IV flag. After updating this flag repost the GRs and invoices.
2. Create a new STO, now since you have updated the vendor maser & info-record, this flag will automatically get updated during the STO creation itself.
First option is tedious and should be selected only if you can go option 2 is not at all feasible

Work flow for invoice verification

I would like to know how to find out/display the workflow related to MIRO transaction code, miro is invoice verification, how to find the z table created for this workflow.
given a work flow template number, how to view this template
thanks

Hello,
For MIRO the associated :
1) BOR : BUS2081
2) Workflow : WS20001004
Can you elaborate your requirement on z table?
If i have correctly understood your requirement :
To display the workflow template, run Tcode SWDD or
PFTC, select WS Workflow Template and give the workflow number without the prefix 'WS'
To make sure the Workflow is triggered, make sure the entry SWETYPV.
Run SWELS, and switch on Trace.
Run TCode : MIRO and check in SWEL, to make sure the Workflow has triggered without errors.
To start with, i hope this helps...
Cheers,
Remi

Error installing 2LIS_06_INV Invoice Verification in Version 7

Hi all,
we have a problem installing the infosource 2LIS_06_INV Invoice Verification.
We can not activate the transformation
RSDS 2LIS_06_INV P7DCLNT000 -> TRCS 2LIS_06_INV (version 7)
because need the routines for fields
              0BBP_SYS_BE
     and    0GN_R3_SYS
These routines are linked as needed in BC but are not installed in our version of BC so this produces an error.
When activating the transformation we obtain the following error :
Runtime Errors         ASSERTION_FAILED
Date and Time          22.01.2008 16:06:24
Short dump has not been completely stored (too big)
Short text
     The ASSERT condition was violated.
What happened?
     In the running application program, the ASSERT statement recognized a
     situation that should not have occurred.
     The runtime error was triggered for one of these reasons:
     - For the checkpoint group specified with the ASSERT statement, the
       activation mode is set to "abort".
     - Via a system variant, the activation mode is globally set to "abort"
       for checkpoint groups in this system.
     - The activation mode is set to "abort" on program level.
     - The ASSERT statement is not assigned to any checkpoint group.
Error analysis
     The following checkpoint group was used: "No checkpoint group specified"
     If in the ASSERT statement the addition FIELDS was used, you can find
     the content of the first 8 specified fields in the following overview:
     " (not used) "
     " (not used) "
     " (not used) "
     " (not used) "
     " (not used) "
     " (not used) "
     " (not used) "
Thanks in advance

hi
check with the patch level. have u checked that do u have any other syntax error in that transforamation?
regards
dina
Edited by: Dina karan on Jan 22, 2008 6:24 PM

Invoice Verification tolerance price varience

Hi All,
I have set Invoice verification tolerance key PP upper limit 5 % and value 5 in customizing.
I have also set message M8082 and M8083 as error message in customizing.
My requirement is to limit user from posting invoice above 5 % of GRN Amount.
The message customizing is working fine for value (M8082) however I cannot get message M8083 for % of invoice amount tolerance.
I want message M8083 to be triggered at invoice verification which is not happening.

Hi,
If the price in an order item is marked as an estimated price, for this item, the system calculates the difference between the invoice value and the product of quantity invoiced * order price and compares the variance with the upper and lower tolerance limits defined
Please confirm your PO should have following check on condition control tab
and maintain the Tolerance key PS for upper and lower % limits, system first go through Val. check and then % tolerance limit check,
then you will get the message M8083
Sohaib Mahmood wrote:
My requirement is to limit user from posting invoice above 5 % of GRN Amount.
The message customizing is working fine for value (M8082) however I cannot get message M8083 for % of invoice amount tolerance.
I want message M8083 to be triggered at invoice verification which is not happening.
if you want to limit the user from posting the invoice by 5% tolerance, then maintain PP tolerance key,
you will get the message M8082 this will solve your purpose,
If your business demand for estimated price variance then maintain PS tolerance key you will get the message M8083
Thanks
Message was edited by: k j

Excise Duty (IS-OIL) - Invoice verification and accounting ED

Hello experts,
I have a case in my importation process with excise duty (IS-OIL). I have the following scenario: Purchasing Ed free material and receive it in ED paid Storage Location. So I use Handling type 00 and Valuation type TAX in the PO excise duty item data. I woul like to kwon Which is the standard process for the invoice verification of the excise duty cost when the handling type is 00 and the valuation type TAX?. And How can I do the invoice verification (MIRO) if there is not a specific line in the purchase order history for the excise duty cost?
I have another case in the accounting of movement type 301 (transfer posting between 2 plants). The accounting posting is the following:
Examle:
Account                       Transaction
1. STOCK FUEL          S                    BSX (Stock account)
2. STOCK FUEL            H             BSX (Stock account)
3. STOCK EXCISE DUTY     S             SVO (ED Account)
4. EXCISE DUTY FUEL           H             ZZP (ED Account)
The problem is that the 4th account must be STOCK EXCISE DUTY ACCOUNT from SVO transaction.
I would be grateful if someone could help me with these cases.
Thank in advance.
Pablo

Dear Prashant,
Thanks for reply, but i checked my excise cond types, in all conditions, cond cat is blank & cond class 'A' is maintained i.e. Discount & Surcharge.
My problem is that, my excise value is not got posted in net receivable value in accounts. This problem arise, when we make sales order, Net Value field doesn't pick excise there & while invoicing, it post only the base value & rounding off adjustments at header level. I don't know, from where this Net Value field in sales order is picking the value but my problem will solve if my grand total value(base valueexciseedu cess+higher edu cess) will pass to Net Value field while making sales order. Kindly help.

PO valueless that goods receipt value once Invoice verification is done

HI Gurus,
I
have created a PO for Value 2500 with Account assignment F (Order), done Invoice verification for value 2500. Then I have changed this line item value to 1500 in POand then tried doing Goods receipt against the PO. This way I was expecting system to throw an error at the tiem of GR but it posted GR successfully that too for an value of 2500 without giving an error or any message system should not post 2500 value as PO value at the time of GR was 1500 or it should have posted a GR for value 1500.
Pls assist me in understanding the system behavior.
Thank you in advance.
Regards
Nilesh

I guess you need to ristrict changing value for PO line item if Invoice verification is done that will solve lot many problems

Purchase Orders Pending for Invoice Verification

Good Afternoon,
I'm looking a report with purchase orders waiting or pending for Invoice Verification.
Those PO's already has the Goods Receipt, and just pending for Invoice Verification.
Thanks for the help.
Hector.

Use report ME2N with selection parameter as RECHNUNG.
or else you can create your own seleciton parameter where you can pull the report only for the invoice which has GR done.
to do that go to SPRO-MM-purchasing-reporting-maintain purchaisng list-selection parameter-define seleciton parameter
hit new entry or copy RECHNUNG
create new one with
IR planned +
Delivered >= 0 ord
and Invoiced < ord
save and use this parameter in ME2N
you will only get the POs list where GR done but no IR

Difference in Invoice verification ( GR/IR)- for Line item wise

Hi,
I have done invoice verification against PO but in my PO having 4 line items 10 to 40 so while doing invoice verification i have made a mistake in line item 10 i made quantity +1008 made extra and in line item 20 i have made less 1008 and i get to know information while doing MR11 line itme show higher quantity and lower quanty so GR/IR Clearing in not possible bacause of difference quantity and so i already paid entry tax on this PO and i can not do MR8M, is their solution workaround to nullyfy the line item
could u suggest if any kind of solution i will appriciate for ur valid suggestion.
Regards
Vinu.

Hi
If MR8M is not possible, then you can post a credit note using the same T.code MIRO for the difference for the excess quantity and later later post an invoice for the short posted quantity.
Regards

GR/IR Freight Clearing Account - GR & Invoice Verification

Dear Gurus,
I have made a PO for 1200 pcs unit price 69.20$. (GR based IV).   (Valuation - Moving average price)
Delivery costs - Freight (FRB1) - 1200$
I have splitted the PO quantity in to 3 different Inbound deliveries
Inbound 1 - 400 pcs
Inbound 2 - 400 pcs
Inbound 3 - 400 pcs
I have made the Goods receipt for the 1st Inbound - 400 pcs.
Goods Receipt 1 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c credited by 400$
Invoice Verification1 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice verification is 1000$.
The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c debited by 1000$
Goods Receipt2 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got credited by 400$
Invoice Verification2 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice Verification is 2000$
The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got debited by 200$ and Stock in Hand debited by 1800$
Goods Receipt3 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got credited by 200$
Invoice Verification3 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice Verification is 1500$
The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got debited by 133.33$ and Stock in Hand debited by 1366.67$
I don't understand how the logic works for seggreating the amount to GR/IR freight clearing account and GR/IR account.
For the first 2 GR and IV I could understand that there is a balance in the PO condition but for the Invoice verification 3. The value debited to GR/IR freight account is 133.33$. Can anyone help me how the calculation is taking place and how the system has arrived to figure 133.33$ in the Invoice verification for GR/IR freight clearing a/c
Strangely when I have cancelled the Invoice Verification document 3.
The value Credited to GR/IR freight clearing account is 333.33$ instead of 133.33$
Can somebody help me to figure out the calucation for IR after the GR for planned delivery costs.
If any SAP notes or help files can be provided then it would be really helpful.
Regards
Fazal.

Refer this note 311496 & 460244, 129066
Symptom
Delivery costs were planned for a purchase order item.
A goods-receipt-based invoice verification is set.
Several goods receipts are posted. For invoice entry, both in conventional invoice verification (transaction MR01/MRHR) and in logistics invoice verification (transaction MR1M/MIRO), the delivery costs for each purchase order item are displayed in total.
This is the same as when, for example, only one of several GR documents/delivery notes is selected.
Example of a purchase order history:
Cat. Doc. no.    Itm    MvT Pstg.dt.            Qty.in BUoM       Value in local curr
GR   5200002605 0001 101 June 16, 2000      5 PC         50,00 DEM
GR   5200002606 0001 101 June 16, 2000      5 PC         50,00 DEM
Sum of goods receipts                      10 PC        100,00 DEM
DCGR 5200002605 0001     June 16, 2000       5 PC           3,33 DEM
DCGR 5200002605 0001     June 16, 2000       5 PC           5.00 DEM
DCGR 5200002606 0001     June 16, 2000       5 PC           3,33 DEM
DCGR 5200002606 0001     June 16, 2000       5 PC           5.00 DEM
Total delivery cost GR                                                 16,66 DEM
If you only select the first GR document in the selection, you get
the following default values for the delivery costs:
Amount    Quantity BUoM Itm Decription              Vendor
6,67         10      PC 10    Freight value        VEND01
10,00        10      PC 10    Freight/quantity     VEND01
(and not, as sometimes expected: - 3,33 DEM    5 PC
                                    - 5,00 DEM    5 PC)
Other terms
WEBRE, delivery costs, planned delivery costs, goods-receipt-based invoice verification, invoice verification
Reason and Prerequisites
A function such as the goods-receipt-based invoice verification is not available for delivery costs.
Solution
This is not an error; this is a consulting note.

Invoice verification with reference to purchase order

Hi experts,
May I know is there any setting or configuration that control the data/field copy from purchase order to invoice in MIRO during invoice verification?
How do we control which field should be copied? If I add another new field in purchase order, how can I make sure it is copy over to invoice in MIRO during invoice verification?
Thanks & regards,
JT

Hi Andra
Thanks for your reply.
Actually what I would like to do is that I added a payment method field in PO. And I would like the payment method to be copied into invoice automatically when we perform the Invoice verification in MIRO instead of manually enter.
Is there anyway to do that?
Thanks and regards,
JT

Purchase Order Reprot with Invoice verification details

Hi Friends,
I need a SAP standard report, in which I can get the PO details for a perticular period of release date along with Invoice verification details, i.e. how much value has been passed and how much is pending.
Can you please suggest any SAP standard report for the Subject.
Kraheja.

Hi
Check ME2n report with selection parameter as GUTSCHRIFT or ME80fn with purchase order history.
Thanks

Invoice verification is not posted with T.Code MIRO

Hi Friends,
1)
I created a purchase order with T.Code: ME21N, and Enter Goods Receipts with T.Code: MIGO after that Invoice verification with T.Code:MIRO, but it is not posted:
Error Message is: Error in account determination: Table T030K Co.Code: RK01 VST.
2)
Balance not zero 5000, debits 5000, credits 10000
for the second purchase order step 1 repeated.
Please help inthis regard,
thanks
ramesh.

Hi,
I think there might be some configuration missing with regard to the tax.
You ahve assign a GL account ot the TAX code for the Transaction Key VST.
Menu Path: SPRO - > Financial Accounting - > Financial Accounting Global Settings - > Tax on Sales/Purchases- > Posting - > Define Tax accounts .
Thakns
kiran

MIRO - Invoice Verification with reference to Delivery note.

Dear All,
In our organisation we are doing MIRO with reference to Delivery note. As same number of delivery note is being submiited by multiple vendors, after entry of that delivery note in MIRO system shows large list (Closed & Open for MIRO). This becomes difficult to select the required delivery note.
Is it possible to make display of only those delivery notes against which MIRO (Invoice verification has not done).
Also MIRO with reference to GRN number is possible or not ?
Please suggest.
Regards,
Shekhar Kisan Gaikwad

In our organisation we are doing MIRO with reference to Delivery note. As same number of delivery note is being submiited by multiple vendors, after entry of that delivery note in MIRO system shows large list (Closed & Open for MIRO). This becomes difficult to select the required delivery note.
Is it possible to make display of only those delivery notes against which MIRO (Invoice verification has not done).
Also MIRO with reference to GRN number is possible or not ?
HI,
To avoid difficulties post miro with Reference document (PO Reference Tab) - Delivery note click on Radio button a possible entries for delivery note screen will appear. Here you can search specific delivery note by a lot of criteria which will save ur time and effort also you can see MIGO Document. Click and put tick to adopt and post Delivery note / migo and enter required field.

Excise is not calculate in invoice verification

Dear All,
I have one issue.
We have create purchase order for project with account assignment category Q.
We put excise (10.30) & Vat 15% in purchase order.
In purchase order all value calculate properly. Good Receipt created against purchase order.
Now we create invoice verification againat purchase order.
but at time of invoice verfication creatoin excise value in not calculate properly in invoice verification, only 15% vat calculate in invoice verification.
All excise detail(J1id) has been maintain for material & vendor master and i have also check tax code in FTXP. All are well maintain.
We have capture excise invoice at the time of good receipt creation.
But Excise value is not calculate
Regards,
Mahesh Wagh

Hi,
If the excise invoice is not posted (Part-II), then it will not flow in MIRO. Pls check same.
You may even check whether the capter id assigned to the material is extended to new excise calculation period.
Regards,

OMRO - Invoice Verification triggered UMB

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for