Is LiveCycle supported on Vmware in production?

I am getting conflicting information concerning LiveCycle and whether it is supported in a virtual environment. I have a client that wants to install and run Process management, in production, on a virtual machine. This is due to limited resources. Please let me know if this set up is a supported environment.

For Development and Testing you can go with the Virtual machine setup (may be a turn-key installation), but for Production it is not advisible.
However if your execution payload is not much, you can try on the virtual machine.
I have experience in devloping adobe applciations in VMWare and we faced the connection failure issues occasionally.
After restart of JBoss service, it will back to operational.
Better consult with your System admin.
Nith

Similar Messages

Oracle product not supported on Vmware virtual environment

Members,
Oracle certification says Oracle products running on Vmware virtual environment are not supported.
One of my development Identity manager setup is running on Vmware virtual environment.
As of now application is running fine and I am getting support from Oracle on product issues.
Can anyone suggest what could be the impact of this in future and what types of issues I can expect in future.
Thanks,
S M

Could you verify this behaviour outside a VMware virtual machine?
If yes, then please open an SR on Metalink to let support diagnose.
Provide an RDA, AWR snapshot if you have licensed the Diagnistic Pack - if not than provide STATSPACK snapshots.
Sorry - but this is a database upgrade forum :-)
Regards
Mike

Two Factor authentication support for VMWare View

Happy to inform you that ArrayShield IDAS Two factor authentication solution has added support to VMWare View. As other product vendors, the integration happens out of the box using RADIUS. Secure and almost nil downtime to add 2FA support to your VMWare View.
ArrayShield IDAS 2FA solution is a patented, multi-award winning product that stands out from the other Two factor authentication product for its innovative solution on using a simple plastic card and pattern combination to derive One Time Secret Code. This gets rid of various dependencies like Hardware token, Smart Card or Mobile networks. Kindly go through our product demo video to understand the product better.
http://www.arrayshield.com/products/howitworks

Finally, this is what I looking. Thanks for giving the link.

To find out how SAP is handling language support in the standard product.

Hi All,
i have one issue like "To find out how SAP is handling language support in the standard product". Any body have the solution, please send me as soon as possible.
i am very thankful to you all in advance.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarjuna.

It would be easier to send a solution if you'd clearly defined the problem!.
SAP is built to be multilingual.
For ABAP development, to ensure that your code is able to be multilingual, you should not hard code any text that the users could see - you should instead use text elements, standard texts, OTR, message classes etc.
matt

RoboHelp 4.0 supported on VMWare

Is RoboHelp 4.0 supported on VMWare?

Hi James
The latest release iAS6.5 supports JDK1.3.1_02.
JDK 1.4 is in the roadmap for iAS7 release.
Thanks

Pleassss i want to know bi 7 supporting project point or production issue

Hi expert,
i am pradeep .a job seeker could pleassss help me. i want to know bi 7 supporting project point or production issue and in bi 7 what are role in production project .shore to assign point my id is [email protected]
thanks&regards
pradeep.k

Hi,
It may vary in different projects.
I can just give you a couple of general roles in Support project
Data Load Monitoring:
1.Carried out data load on a daily, weekly and monthly basis using Process chains from both SAP Source systems as well as Non-SAP Source systems such as Informatica.
2.Resolving Data load error such as Invalid characters, Time period conversion, Currency conversion, Duplicate records, etc
3.Ensuring the availability of the updated data in the datatarget on time.
4.Spooling out data through Infospoke from SAP BW to systems like Trillium, Ariba (Reporting Tool)
Ticket Resolution:
1.Process chain modification: Working on Optimizing Process chain by creating new process chain considering the load dependencies.
2.Reloading of R/3 data from different clusters Reconciliation issues
3.Enhancements as per Business requirement.
Additional responsibilities:
Preparing design documents from the Business Requirement docs and identified the relevant data targets for satisfying the customer requirements.
Creation of Operational manual: BW Run & Maintain Support.
Process Chain Detail Documentation (Sequencing & Dependency within Local Chains).
Monitoring checklist Document (From Process Chain Perspective)
BW Doc checklist preparation
Table space activity with basis team.
Data load analysis taking into account the CPU utilization.
Applying Support packs and performing ORT.
Refer
Roles & Responsibilities for Junior & Senior consultants(Technical)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/08f1b622-0c01-0010-618c-cb41e12c72be
Production and Implementation
/message/4755150#4755150 [original link is broken]?
hope this helps,
Thanks,

Supporting and troubleshooting large production BW systems

Hi gurus,
Please help me regarding the below. I am new to SAP BW.
1) supporting and troubleshooting large production BW systems, Any examples.
2) How can we achieve Performance tuning, Any examples is appreciated Please..
3) Performance management of complex queries and BW system as a whole
4) Any material regarding BW 3.x design and configuration.
Can any one please provide me with some documents,links or material to my email ID: [email protected]
Thanks
Venu

Re: In production Support , how i can acquire the knowledge
Re: How to resolve tickets its urgent
Re: production support issues
production support

Windows 8 VAIO laptop - MS support insists on a product key but there isn't one

I have a VAIO SVE17125CDB that has behaved wonky since I first got it so I decided to do a system reset. Before doing the reset I upgraded the computer's BIOS (often a good idea in a situation like this). The problem is that now I need to redo the Windows' activation. Microsoft support claims that upgrading the BIOS is what caused this. They say this is quite normal and all they need is the product key. They (two levels of MS support) insist that the product key MUST be on a sticker on the bottom of the laptop. It is not. Without the product key they refuse to activate my PC. Sony support says I don't need the product key with Windows 8. So now I have a useless laptop. I think Sony and MS need to talk to each other.

Centrant,
I am sorry for any mixed information or if this difers from what you've been previously told, but there is no sticker with a Windows product key on the bottom of the VAIO notebook and this is completely normal.
If someone at Microsoft told you differently, they are completely incorrect. The Product key is embedded into the motherboard of the notebook and you should not have to enter the product key when you install Windows 8 (if everything is working properly). Windows should have visibility and be capable of using this key automatically.
If Microsoft repeatedly refuses to assist you beacuse there is no sticker on the Notebook, please obtain the Microsoft Agent's name, Agent ID, and a reference number to your phone call with them and I will provide feedback to Microsoft.
Updating the BIOS does not affect your Windows 8 Product key. However, changing hardware inside the notebook can. Have you undergone any repair or any parts replacement on this notebook at all? Please let me know as this is very important.
Without additional information it is hard to tell, but it is possible that something went wrong when you performed the system Reset. I would suggest instead performing a Factory Recovery with Sony Recovery Discs to ensure that the software is installed properly to Sony specifications. Is this something you would be willing to try? Did you create recovery discs initially when you first got the computer? If not you can purchase them from Sony Parts.
If you are installing your own copy of Windows 8 and not the copy with the Sony Recovery Discs, then you should still not need to enter the product key because it is embedded into the notebook.

ADE Supported Platforms and Compatible Products

Hi
Could I please have the latest information on supported platforms and compatibile products if any available on ADE (Application Data Exchange)as the user manual gives only this information:
Supported Platforms:ADE can run on Windows 95, Windows 98 or Windows NT 3.5 or 4.0.
Compatible Products :Spreadsheets Microsoft Excel 95 and 97 or Lotus 123 Version 5.0, Word Processors Microsoft Word 95 and 97
Thanks and regards
Anu

Hi,
if its not listed in the PAR i would recommend you open an OSS Message with the SAP Support to get an official statement.
Regards
-Seb.

Let's ask HP to categorize support forum for every product model or at least every model series

Hi all HP fans!
I really wonder why not HP Support Forum is not categorized by every product model or at least model series to help customers post issues in apropriate group and helpers don't get confused in thousands of unrelated questions.
Regards
AlizzA

Because they don't care...
I've been a service tech for 18 years repairing HP products, from Laserjets to Designjets and I used their technical support web site and phone support for help when I was stuck.
In the early years Tech Support was great! They were a knowledgeable and helpful team of bright people.
This was when HP had direction and vision.
They cared about the customer, the customer's satisfaction and the companies image.
Not any more.
Just look at the piles and piles of ticked off people ranting about HP's Customer Support...it's shameful!
HP pumps out new products faster than ever, dropping support for relatively new products and leaving customers and 3rd party support providers out in the cold.
They put up self-help websites like this one to make themselves feel better.
We've moved on to Canon products and let me tell you...we've never looked back!
Customer and tech support are second to none as well as the products!
Message Edited by MudSlinger7 on 11-02-2009 05:24 PM

Is BOXI XI R2 supported on VMWARE ?

Is Business Objects XI R2 supported in a virtual environment? I pulled the platforms document for BOXI R2 and there is no mention of this in the document. Appreciate any help.
Thanks
Jagannathan Santhanam

I had logged the very same question with support and they recommended that you do not try this with a production deployment but for a Test/Dev environment its fine.
You will want your production system to be running with as many resources as possible especially if you are looking at using QaaWs with Xcelsius.
For example, I have found this combination could be lethal if I were running in a VMWare environment because it has a tendency to eat up the WIReportServer processes. Having a physical cluster I can be assured I can run 2 services with for each processor in the system, with VMWare running its only a guess if this is still true.
Hope this helps....
Tom Nather

Adobe Configurator and deprecated Flash-based panel support in Adobe CC products

Does Configurator 4.0 (or Configurator 3) support the creation of HTML5-based panels?
I received the following email from Adobe:
Photoshop CC, starting in the middle of 2014, will remove support for Flash-based extensions. All other Creative Cloud products have already marked Flash-based panel support as deprecated at this time, meaning no future enhancements or bug fixes will be coming for Flash-based extensions.
The current version of Photoshop CC already includes support for a new type of HTML5 based panel. We are currently working on a new version of Adobe Extension Builder designed specifically to support the creation of these HTML5 based panels. You can download a free preview here: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/extensionbuilder3/.
Details about developing HTML5 extensions for Photoshop as well as for other Creative Cloud products are available in the Extension Builder pre-release program here: https://adobeformscentral.com/?f=6V6IgvE0yLQQ7bgadxNXaw . You can also join the Photoshop developers' prerelease program for details specific to Photoshop. If you're interested, please let me know and I will get you setup.
Will the panels created by Configurator 4.0 work in PS CC after the middle of 2014 when support for Flash-based extensions is removed from Photoshop CC? For that matter, will the panels created in Configurator 3.0 work in PS CC after the middle of 2014?

I've carefully read all the posts here and would like to give my feedback on the whole question. I'm a professional retoucher and a teacher as well, and during my professional carrer I've built dozens of panels.
I do really take advantage of boosting my productivity with any customized panel, as automation is something that adds speed, reliability and dramatically reduce errors during repetitive tasks. Therefore, I can't live without it.
Now, I understand why Adobe wants to move towards HTML 5, but please give us the ability to keep our work at the same level of efficiency we currently have. Photoshop is not for amateurs, it's a professional software. And professionals must keep their productivity, for sure they can't afford any loss of it, especially in these times!
Moving from Flash to HTML 5 means rebuilding all the existing panels from scratch: how much this will cost to us in terms of time (and money) if we could have an HTML 5 version of Configurator? And how much, if we don't have a tool like Configurator at all? Three times, ten times as much? Maybe Adobe knows the answer, not me, I'm not a coder. But I'd like to know this answer.
Further, picture this: I've taught several classes for at least five intercontinental companies on how to build actions and organize them into panels for improving their productivity. Every time the response was the same: BOOM!
They had a huge speed improvement in their daily workflows, and started to build dozens of panels by themselves for any possibile use. It was like opening a Pandora's box for them (their words).
Every one who attended my classes, have taught the same topic inside their company and the reaction was always the same. So now, in every company in which I've taught building panels and actions, there are hundreds of panels for many different uses, all over the world. Of course, as 100% of them were specifically built for internal use, they shared the panels among them, but not outside their company.
Many of them who are now mid-advanced users, have written to me asking how they could keep their panels working correctly in the next CC version of Photoshop. I have no solution for them, unless many of them become coders. That's a bad answer, I must admit, but no way out right now.
Their reply to me was very straight: "well, we won't upgrade any copy of Photoshop until we can keep our panels working correctly for sure. For us is much more important being productive and efficient than upgrading to the latest version, if this means to lower our performance, no doubt."
Adobe wanted to integrate all their softwares into the Creative Cloud. So far so good, I'm for it. But when you decide to integrate everything saying to the world that "it's for the sake of a better productivity", then you must really integrate them. Otherwise people will think that it was only a commercial move. So why we can't build panels for the applications inside Muse, for example? It was introduced to allow people to build websites quickly and efficiently using HTML 5, taking care about the layout instead of investing too much time in coding.
Exactly what Configurator allowed to do. Focus on the result with minimal time cost, aka money cost.
World is running faster, therefore we need to work faster too. And without Configurator we won't. I can't disagree with all the people that won't upgrade Photoshop, if this means that they'll work slower because they can't use their panels carefully made by themselves. Photoshop is a tool for producing ideas and other nice stuff, like any software. The faster it is, the most people will like it, the better will sold. A simple truth. Think about what happened to Apple Finalcut ProX and how many users switched to Premiere. Photoshop has no competitors except new versions of itself.
And this does not apply only the CC users. Look at the bigger picture: how many users still using CS6 with all their fully working panels won't upgrade to CC if they know they'll reduce their productivity?
Think about the answer. Carefully.

HT202696 What happens if Apple Support expires for a product? Does it mean there is no more help available and you are on your own just because you have an older Apple product?

We have a family of Apple products at home, and with every new one, we learn a new aspect of the Apple Life. After switching to iPhone 5S and struggling between some applications, I've decided it is time to upgrade rest of my older devices requesting an IOS Upgrade to 8.1.2 for weeks.
My older iPhone 4 didn't have an upgrade, which was not advanced enough anymore to carry a new software, this I understand. The upgraded iPod Touch and iPad Mini don't seem to have any problems with the recent changes so far. However, the older iPad (2) we had is messed up, just like many other people's as mentioned on the pages of these discussion groups. According to these user comments / complaints, it is obvious that upgrading to IOS 8.1.2 was not the right option to older version iPads just like it was not for iPhone 4; actually it shouldn't be an option in the first place.
On my previous problems with iPhone 5S, I've come to realise the practicality & functionality of the Apple Support system when contacted directly, instead of going through many discussion pages of people with same or similar problems where everybody is asking but just a few is replying. So, I wanted to give it a try to find a solution to my recent problems with iPad, but this time Apple Support pages replied with "Technical Support & Service Coverage are both Expired" message.
First, I did not know that Apple supported its users personally, and I loved it. Maybe this is because I didn't have previous problems with my old iPhone and iPad. Especially the Apple Support - Chat option I preferred, where I got help step-by-step from Apple operators. And then, I did not know that this service support was only for my devices until an expiration date, and this did not please me much.
Can anyone enlighten me on how to receive any response from Apple about what to do with problems of an old Apple device?

And as far as paying for phone support, here are a few tips:
If you call your carrier first and then they route you to Apple, you usually don't have to pay for phone support.
If you are talking to Apple and they ask you to pay a support fee, ask if you can get an exception this time. That usually works once, but they keep track of the times you've been granted such an exception.
If you still end up paying the support fee, that fee only applies if it's not a hardware related issue. In other words, if it can be fixed by just talking over the phone and following Apple's instructions, then the fee applies. But if your device is deemed to have a hardware failure that caused the issue, then the fee should not apply, and you can ask for it to be waived after the fact.
This forum is free, and almost all of the technical support articles the Apple tech advisors use are available on this website. Literally 99% of what they can do over the phone is just walking you through the publicly available support articles. In other words, you're paying the fee to have them do your research for you. It's like hiring a research consultant to go look stuff up in the public library so you don't have to. You're capable of doing it; you'd just rather pay someone to do it for you.
It's like Starbucks. You know how to make coffee. Everyone knows how to make coffee. And Starbucks coffee isn't any better than what you could make at home for far less. But you want the convenience. So you're really paying a convenience fee. Milk is more expensive at 7-Eleven than it is at the grocery store... because it's a convenience store.

HT5621 can't contact Apple support because it's product related

I wanted to start using iCloud so I clicked on it in Preferences. This led me to having to change my Apple password since it's years since I signed in. I can actually sign in though because my keychain remembers the password, even though I don't. However, when I tried to change the password it sent me an email. I can't get this email though because it's been sent (I think) to my .mac email address (never used it). If I open Apple's Mail programme (instead of my usual Outlook programme) it DOES open the .mac account but the most recent emails are from 2012, when Apple closed the MobileMe service.
So... I tried to change my primary email address in the Apple ID settings but I can't (of course) because it doesn't have the edit button next to it (something to do with how it was originally set). The advice on Apple's support pages is that it can't be changed and that I have to contact Apple Support. I tried to do this but (of course) I can't because support is PRODUCT related and not SERVICE related. My Apple products (two iMacs, two iPads and an iPhone) are al out of the support window.
This is extremely unimpressive and frustrating. I'm actually trying to buy another service from Apple (iCloud) but it won't let me.

Glad to hear it's resolved, for future reference all support related to an Apple ID is free.
Contact AppleCare (or Apple ID Support), upon speaking to an operator you should explain that your problem is related to your Apple ID, this way you will not be charged for assistance, even if you don’t have an AppleCare plan.

Shared execution context support in SOA Suite Products

Context:
An enterprise application is likely to be made up of components that span across the BPEL, JEE (servlets and EJBs) and ESB containers with heterogeneous mix of technologies/computing languages (especially if part of that application is a legacy application), communication protocols, transport, QoS capabilities etc. The latter opens up a complex set of related issues such as assertion, ownership and enforcement of policies and contracts (both infrastructure-oriented such as security, privacy, manageability and business-oriented such as hours of business, goods return policies) that must be managed in order for the application to behave consistently end to end. In a way, this concept is similar to one of header vs payload distinction.
Goal:
Yet those heterogeneous resources and technologies mentioned above should be abstracted (or externalized) from the business intent, ie the actual data and associated functional processing that deliver real benefits to business, as contextual information that may be both out-of-band and in-band (ie something that is created during the course of an interaction). In this way, the business components (BPEL scripts, presentation tier actions [as opposed to controllers], POJOs, or ESB mediation services implemented using XSLT scripts etc) can be reused in completely new unplanned scenarios with newer execution platforms/infrastructure since the latter can be made virtualized from the point of view of the business components.
To achieve the above, one of the key enabling factors is a shared execution context to capture such dynamic relationships between the application modules or components or services that is technology neutral but can be passed from one containers to the other seamlessly.
Problem:
Having understood the context and goals, the big question is what is the level of support for a shared context implementation found in Oracle BPEL, JEE and ESB containers? Especially in the ESB container since it is the execution environment of all services.
This overarching problem may be decomposed to the following:
* How far is loose coupling of services implemented? Strictly pure XML over HTTP or web services between tiers/containers?
* If it is pure web services everywhere, what about the impedance mismatch problem between POJOs and XML?
* If so, what is the form of a message dispatch/invocation framework to be put in place between tiers/containers? WSIF/AXIS? The choice will obviously be influenced by NFRs and to some extent the ease of integration of such frameworks with Oracle products runtime libraries.
* How does a service lookup another, at design-time or run-time?
* What mechanisms are there in each of the 3 containers above to allow for dynamic service assembly and dependencies injections?
* How should a message be structured (header vs payload)?
* How easy is the header or context that is most likely to be expressed in XML format be mapped to a run-time artifact in each of the containers? Is this mapping process lossless? This header is more than likely to carry a diverse range of information such as session and authentication tokens, management data, logs, audit trails, errors/exceptions and other QoS data.
In attempting to design and implement the above architectural requirements on Oracle SOA suite, I am unable to find any semblance of a design or runtime construct or artifact that is remotely close to what I would call a shared context. Should I conclude therefore that I would have to build the above facilities from ground up, instead of being able to customize a shared context construct or feature in Oracle SOA suite (the ESB container in particular)? I would have thought this is a fundamental capability of an integration platform such as Oracle SOA suite, am I right?

I supposed to make my previous question more concrete, the first answer I need before moving on to the rest of the bigger questions is this ...
What is Oracle’s recommendation for a services invocation framework between BPEL, JEE and ESB containers? From a quick read of Oracle Technet website, WSIF seem to be the preferred framework for this purpose. However, from an equally quick survey of such frameworks in use today outside of Oracle, WSIF does not seem to enjoy any widespread developer community support anymore and all talk in public forum seem to point to newer Apache Frameworks such as CXF which support emerging standards such as JAX-WS 2.0 What is the current stand of Oracle with respect to this matter?

Is LiveCycle supported on Vmware in production?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for