IS Retail-Recipient Driven Merchandise distribution Flow through

Hi
On receipt of goods how the delivery document is created automatically for the recipient driven flow through .
Now for me In WF60 delivery document is not getting craeted says "No processing doc found" .How the automatic delivery document is getting created at the point of GR.
Pls explain me in detail,wat are the necessary configs needed .

Hi Kumar,
The following link will help you to solve your query:
help.sap.com/bp_retailv1470/documentation/EN/Merchandise%20Distribution_EN_DOCU_V147.doc
Regards,
ManiKumaar

Similar Messages

Retail : Merchandise Distribution and decentralized WMS

Hello Dear Experts !
My customer uses SAP Retail and a decentralized WMS.
We're setting up a FT flow, but the WMS requires to know that a GR is subject to distribution using the link Vendor PO-Store deliveries.
So, the standard business process is not applicable :
- Create the store's STO/SO
- Create a global vendor PO
- Create the GR.
- Adjust the quantities
- Create the deliveries
This because at the interfacing of the vendor PO, we can't adjust the quantities (as the GR is not done...)
I'm trying to convince the customer this is NOT the best practice, but...
Does anyone have any suggestion how I could set up such a flow using standard functionality ?
Thanks for your help.
Didier.

You will get all your answers on Merchandise Distribution in following link.
SAP Presentation :
http://help.sap.com/bp_retail603/BBLibrary/Documentation/743_Scen_Overview_EN_US.ppt
Configuration Guide for "Merchandise Distribution" [IMG]
http://help.sap.com/bp_retail603/BBLibrary/Documentation/743_BB_ConfigGuide_EN_US.doc"
Business Process Documentation "Merchandise Distribution" [Easy Access].
http://help.sap.com/bp_retail603/BBLibrary/Documentation/743_BPP_EN_US.doc

SAP Retail - Flow-through vs putaway quantities

Hi!
My customer receives in his DC and ships same day 80% of his units, using a "flow-through merch driven" type process (for which we need a lean WM warehouse). The other 20% goes in putaway stock (for which we need a full WM warehouse) for future replenisment. We therefore need 2 storage locations to point on these 2 warehouses. On the other hand, we do not want to create 2 PO line items per sku: we want to be able to easily post the stock in the proper storage location upon goods receipt.
Would anyone have faced this situation, and would have found a way to resolve it?
Thanks.
Sebastien

Dear Sebastien,
It is important to understand that, although the term "split" is used here, an
individual item within a transfer order is not split into smaller items, regardless of
the quantity in that item. The items are not changed. Instead, the items within a
single transfer order are distributed (spread out) among two or more transfer orders.
In the Customizing application, you can define whether a transfer order split is to take place and select a mix of detailed criteria that affect the split. A customer exit is also available to define your own criteria for this task. For instructions on how to set up your system for the TO split, see
Activities -> Transfers -> Processing performance data / TO split -> Define profiles in the Warehouse Management IMG documentation.
The following transfer order split capabilities are available.
Split according to movement unit is viewed as a separate function that is processed independently from the other split criteria.
For each movement unit (SUT in an item) a split is planned. The TO contains an item with exactly one movement unit. The split is necessary when the actual data is recorded and plays a role in the calculation of the planned times. Based on the Customizing definition, you can switch off the split function and decide to use the standard process.
Sorting items in the transfer order.
The items in the TO are sequenced so that the document created for the TO lists the storage bins from which materials are to picked in an optimal sort order for processing. The routes are minimized and, consequently, the planned and actual processing times. An additional field in the storage bin defines a sequence for all bins in the warehouse. The customer maintains this field.
Transfer orders can also be split according to the following criteria:
Storage type/section
Planned transfer order processing time
Quantity of containers / weight / volume
Mix (combination of named criteria)
Regards,
Naveen.

IS-R: Picking in Flow Through and Cross Docking

In Merchandise Distribution (conceptually),
- for recipient-driven flow through, picking is done before GI.
- for cross-docking, no picking.
Which configuration controls the picking has to be done in flow-through and not to be done in cross-docking?

>
Vitthavat A. wrote:
> In Merchandise Distribution (conceptually),
> - for recipient-driven flow through, picking is done before GI.
> - for cross-docking, no picking.
>
> Which configuration controls the picking has to be done in flow-through and not to be done in cross-docking?
Hi,
Path - IMG - Logistics General - Merchandise Distribution -- Plant Profiles for Merchandise Distribution
If you indicate not relevant for picking
or
Delivery Item category - OVLP
Same indicator is available at delivery item category
Regards
Vijai Jain

Merchandise Distribution Collective PO with SLS - Minimum Order Value

Hi,
My organisation is using Merchandise Distribution with SLS to generate collective PO's at our consolidation platforms before generating either STO's or PO to the supply source.
We're utilising Cross Dock and Flow Through to support our processes but in the case of Cross Dock, we're essentially asking the supply source to pick/pack the stock for the final recipient, therefore it can be quite an expensive process for the supply source (but clearly not for us).
Before we implemented this the supply source used to simply receive orders directly from the store and within this process we applied Minimum Order Values, as per my previous statement it can be expensive and picking a couple of small items for one store and having to put them on a pallet is not economical for them in either warehousing or transportation.
I'm looking for some broad suggestions on how this could be achieved whilst utilising collective orders.
Our store STO's generated by MRP (and soon enough F&R) are large STO's that are not truly supply source specific, they are consolidation platform specific and the collective orders generated off the back of them are supply source specific.
The key issue i see is that we're asking for a select group of lines within the store STO to meet an MOV of the vendor OR that we somehow ensure that the store STO's are supply source specific and then enforce some MOV logic.
Obviously this isn't standard but it's causing our organisation big supply issues, so any thoughts or advice would be fantastic.
Many thanks

Hi ,
You can not do directly in ME59N. Check for user exit for this t code.
Thanks,
Venkat

Delivery not created in Merchandise distribution - WF30

Hi Experts,
I am came accross an issue wherein delivery not created for merchandise distribution.
It is automatically created at the time of goods receipt.
We are using flow through process.
On same day, three PO created via allocation table. Each PO had its STOs linked to it and same article in it.
For two POs, merchandise distribution happened automatically on goods receipt.
For third PO, it failed for same article.
I can see in WF30, there is FT qty populated in adjust button.
That means qty is adjusted per STO.
But then delivery not created.
I am wondering why is is not created for one PO but processed successfully for another two POs.
Article master is not chenged.
Can anybody please advice, what could be the possible reason for it.

Sagar,
For the article in the third PO, please check what storage location is being picked up. Check the cumulative ATP quantity for this article/storage location (use Co09 with checking rule B). There maybe a shortage of stock.
Thanks,
Suhas

Cross docking and flow throughs

Hi Gurus,
Can anyboday send me configuration steps in cross docking and flow through scenarios in is retail.
thanks in advance.
Regards,
PS

Hi,
Explore following URL
Collective Purchase Order
Bye,
Muralidhara

Merchandise Distribution (WF10) Modifications Anyone?

Hi everyone,
As the subject suggests, i'm trying to figure out if anyone has been involved in or has modifiied WF10?
Below i've highlighted 3 areas we want to improve, but please let me know of any changes you've made.
We've been using Merchandise Distribution now for over 12 months and find the standard functionality just isn't delivering expected results as it's fairly limited / under developed compared with most Retail functionality.
1) Not being able to select input STO document types into the collective process, thus generating a distinct output collective document type. (Input type driving output type)
- At our organisation we've a number of document types to segregate demand types (Allocation, Replen, Range review etc), the standard solution just groups them together into a single collective, therefore loose this segregation at out DC where they provide value added services (special labelling / packing etc).
- Ideally we would want to do multiple runs of WF10 for each DC to generate a Collective By Doc Type. Has anyone done this?
2) The Delivery Due Date on the collective is not related to the STO Delivery Due Date, it's separately calculated at the DC level.
- If we happen to create an STO with an allocation with a due date of a months time (pre ordering for a range review maybe), then the collective is generated with the standard lead time, which then requires manually changing, if we don't it gets closed far too early in relation to the STO's.
- Also we exclude the weekends from out store level due date calculation when ordering internal from the DC, collectives don't have any awareness of this or config available, so the two documents are always out of sync.
- Ideally we would want this to be based upon the STO(s) Net of the lead time between the DC and Store, to allow for the inventory to be processed prior to the store requiring it.
3) There is no real way to group STO's by delivery due dates, to create a Collective that has "clean" STO due dates contained within. You can select the procurement period and schedule line interval etc, but this doesn't group STO's into collective. We could run WF10 many many times going into the future for individual days, but this doesn't sounds viable really and even still wouldn't produce the right result.
- We basically find we group all sorts of stuff together, all of which actually need delivering on different days, which in our fairly complex and flexible supply chain just doesn't work well.
- Ideally it would be a single collective run(by doc type), which grouped STO's and split collectives by the STO due dates
Any thoughts or suggestions?
Many thanks,
Dave

Hi Prabhu,
Thats been most helpful indeed, thank you!
We met with SAP today and discussed, they recommended that for the selection by document type would need to be a modification and recommended that they should do this as a customer development, rather than develop in-house. In truth i think this is the best approach due to ongoing support.
I would be really interested to find out a little more, as there are so few organisations using WF10 and it's a fairly underdeveloped area of SAP retail.
Two things i'd be particularly interested in is:
1) Do you have anymore information on the other changes you said were similar to what i mentioned (i'm assuming splitting by due date and due date calculation changes?)?
2) If possible would you be able to share with me on email which organisation it is that had these change made, as our organisation would be keen to speak with them on this. I know this isn't always possible for a number of reasons. If this is ok let me know and i'll send you my email address.
Kind regards,
Dave

Great britain E filling-add recipient type in distribution list

Hi,
My client is about to file e filling but her name needs to be added in distribution list through t code sbwp,but the problem is that in the drop down value of recipient type for all the employees who can file Ereturns an addition value-'via internet' is displayed but for the employee whom I want to add this value is not there in the drop down of recipient type.Can any body tell me what all configurations I need to do for this .
Quick responce is greatly appreciated.
Cheers
Rajeev

check link:-
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a8/809d1dfc8711d2a2b400a0c943858e/frameset.htm]
Also check In transaction-SO23

Easy way to add members in hyperion reports that flow through levels

All,
I am creating a new report that I want it to flow through the generations properly without setting up each member and the children of that member manually. I would like to see the following:
Level 3 member
level 2 member
level 1
level 2 member
level 1
and so on.
Right now I have to add the level 3, then on the next line level 2 and the next line children of level 2. I have tried ancestors, siblings and descendants and it is giving me what I am looking for. I am afraid of doing it manually I will have a lot of maintenance when new level 2 members are added.
If anyone has an idea on how it can be done easier i would really appreciate it.
Thanks

Have you created parent child hierarchy or Value Hirerarchy.?. If we dont define it as value hierarchy any update on the Essbase side to this dimension will not reflect on OBIEE side . for these levels , refer to
http://www.rittmanmead.com/2010/07/obiee-11gr1-support-for-ragged-skip-level-value-based-hierarchies/
http://www.rittmanmead.com/files/rittman_oug_epm_2011.pdf
Hope this helps. Pls mark if it does.
Thanks,
SVS

HT3777 I have a Window 7 HP laptop. I want to install Snow Leopard on an external hard drive as the memory space on my laptop is very less. I have the original snow leopard disc and I think it's a retail version . Please guide me through the installation.

I have a Window 7 HP laptop. I want to install Snow Leopard on an external hard drive as the memory space on my laptop is very less. I have the original snow leopard disc and I think it's a retail version . Please guide me through the installation in details. Can you also please let me know about this boot camp.

You cannot. From a legal standpoint, the license agreement for OS X mandates that you run OS X only on Apple hardware. HP is not (yet) owned by Apple.
From a technical standpoint, your HP laptop doesn't use EFI, but rather an early predecessor called a BIOS. Apple is the only vendor of consumer computer hardware that uses EFI; other vendors reserve EFI for use in servers.
Secondly, Apple's operating systems support a rather limited number of configurations of video hardware and mainboard chipsets directly since they need only support those systems that they manufacture. You cannot use Windows software or drivers on OS X, so prior to installation, you would need to write your own hardware drivers for your laptop, create an OS X drive image on a Mac, and then modify that image with your drivers before putting it in the HP.
It will be simpler (and legal), to simply purchase a used Mac. Apple's online store has refurbished MacBook Airs starting at $850 and Mac Minis for $700. If you go to e-bay or craigslist, you'll find used Macs for considerably less.

Hi,When I submit the budget for approval, it is approved and base lined when we submit it for approval. It does not go in approval hierarchy. We want it to flow through approval hierarchy.

Hi,When I submit the budget for approval, it is approved and base lined when we submit it for approval. It does not go in approval hierarchy. We want it to flow through approval hierarchy.

Hi Amit,
if I understand correctly, you just need for a particular object a tooltip to be showed.
There is no such functionality hence you used the trick of using a hyperlink, which if clicked generates undesired behavior.
Hyperlinks don't allow themselves to be disabled, therefore if you are using that workaround you must cope with that.
I would suggest to create an Idea at [https://ideas.sap.com] for having in the properties of an object a tooltip, then post the link to the idea here and other users will vote if they like the idea.
Thanks and regards,
Simone

Aperture - flow through to IPhone/IPad Photos

Could someone please explain to me how the Aperture 3 Albums (and related photos) flow through to the Photo App on my IPhone and IPad?
Some photos show up immediately, some show up in an hour, some never show up ... am i missing something?
Does my IPhone/IPad need to be connected to the computer to get updated?
Sometimes it is, sometimes it is not?
Is there a way to force sync to Aperture 3?
Thanks in Advance
Mark

Mark,
the most reliable way to sync your albums and projects using iTunes. Connect your iPad/iPhone to your computer using USB. The will appear in iTunes in the "Devices" section of the Library inspector, and when you select them, you can select in the "Photos" tab the albums and projects that you want to sync. This will sync immediately.
The other way to transfer images is the Photo stream. This will sync, when the network is available and the photo stream is enable on both devices.
Regards
Léonie

How to default distribution account through purchase requisition, selecting the project expenditure type

Dear All,
How to default distribution account through purchase requisition, selecting the project expenditure type
Thanks
Abdul.

Hi Abdul,
If you meant defaulting Purchase Order distribution accounts from the (backing) requisition, then the accounts from requisitions will default into the autocreated PO.
If you seek to default distribution accounts for Purchase Requisition using Projects, then the account generator need to have customized rules defined to default account for project enabled distributions based on the Project/Task/Organization/Expenditure Type/Date combination entered.
This note is an extract from the user's guide, and has good detail on defaulting rules of accounts for Purchase Documents:
How Does The Account Generator Default The Accounts In Oracle Purchasing? (Doc ID 1067139.1)
Hope this helps.
Vanha

Project Server 2010 permissions granted through RBS are not flowing through to Project Sites.

Hi,
I have configured RBS as "The Project Owner is a descendant of the user via RBS" its working fine for Projects.
But users are facing access denied issue when working with project sites RBS is not working for project sites.
Can any one Help me How can i grant permissions Automatically for project sites also as same like projects is it possible ?
The Members in Executives group can see all projects in organization but same like can they see all project sites ?
I have found one blog of
RaymondRis he is recommending to do it manually as its not possible to grant Project site permissions Automatically.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/raymond_ris/archive/2013/05/09/project-server-2010-permissions-granted-through-rbs-are-not-flowing-through-to-project-sites.aspx
Thank You, Kumar KSV

Kumar,
The permissions to project sites is not cotrolled by the RBS, as you have discovered. It is controlled by the Security Category permisisons, and the settings if the permssions are auto synced. The permissions work like this:
Project managers who have published a project or who have Save Project permissions on a project are added to the Project Managers (Microsoft Project Server) site group.
Team members with assignments in a project are added to the Team members (Microsoft Project Server) site group.
Other Project Server users who have View Project Site permission on a project are added to the Readers (Microsoft Project Server) site group.
As long as you use the Auto Sync of permisisons for project sites, i do not think there is any work around.
Cheers,
Prasanna Adavi, Project MVP
Blog:
Podcast:
Twitter:
LinkedIn:

IS Retail-Recipient Driven Merchandise distribution Flow through

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for