Issue in PPOME transaction
Hi Experts,
I am able to see an employee in PPOME under 'person' search, but the same employee is not getting reflected under 'user' search.
Pls let me know what could be the possible reason and how to get it reflected.Thanks.
Regards,
Rams
Hi,
Please verify if you can see the same in PP01 transaction as there are issues generally when you create any relationship or object in PPOCE/PPOME transaction.
If you cannot see in PP01 create one and then try, may be you can now see the same.
Thanks,
Ameet
Similar Messages
-
Want to add new ICON to PPOME transaction plz suggest the procedure
Hi friends,
In my requriement, I want to add one ICON to PPOME transaction, in Basic Data tab section. I want some user action also to be performed.
Please suggest me how to tackle this issue.
Thanks in advance,
Phani Shankar.KPlease check Hararkey frame work in IMG
SPRO> Personnel Administration> Organizational Management>harrekey frame work. -
2 issues with call transaction to LS24
Hello All,
There are 2 issues with call transaction to LS24.
<b>1) It doesn't take batch value and displays stock for all batches.
2) When you go back, it doesn't go back to the calling program.</b>
Any thoughts ?
<u>Here is my code:</u>
PARAMETERS: p_lgnum TYPE lgnum,
p_matnr TYPE matnr,
p_werks TYPE werks_d,
p_lgort TYPE lgort_d,
p_charg TYPE charg_d.
START-OF-SELECTION.
END-OF-SELECTION.
PERFORM display_stock_per_batch.
*& Form DISPLAY_STOCK_PER_BATCH
FORM display_stock_per_batch .
SET PARAMETER ID 'LGN' FIELD p_lgnum.
SET PARAMETER ID 'MAT' FIELD p_matnr.
SET PARAMETER ID 'WRK' FIELD p_werks.
SET PARAMETER ID 'LAG' FIELD p_lgort.
SET PARAMETER ID 'CHA' FIELD p_charg.
CALL TRANSACTION 'LS24' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
ENDFORM. " DISPLAY_STOCK_PER_BATCHhello
use this code
perform bdc_dynpro using 'SAPML01S' '0209'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_CURSOR'
'RL01S-CHARG'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_OKCODE'
'/00'.
perform bdc_field using 'RL01S-LGNUM'
p_lgnum.
perform bdc_field using 'RL01S-MATNR'
p_matnr.
perform bdc_field using 'RL01S-WERKS'
p_werks.
perform bdc_field using 'RL01S-LGORT'
p_lgort.
perform bdc_field using 'RL01S-BESTQ'
perform bdc_field using 'RL01S-SOBKZ'
perform bdc_field using 'RL01S-CHARG'
p_charg.
perform bdc_dynpro using 'SAPML01S' '0209'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_OKCODE'
'/EBACK'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_CURSOR'
'RL01S-LGNUM'.
perform bdc_transaction using 'LS24'.
may be it will help u -
Problem with Period selection in PPOME transaction!
Dear All,
I have a very strange problem while selecting the time period in the PPOME transaction.
While selecting the "date and forecast period" option from the "settings" option in the menu bar, the time period in the preview the PPOME transaction must show as 3 months by default. But for my user ID when i select the preview period, the month field is displayed as blank and the end date is always defaulted to current date.
Is this time period coming from any configuration? I would like to know is there any way to by which we can change and save the time period settings.
Thanks,
sridharanGoto PE03->ABKRS in Change mode. You will be able to uncheck or check the fields.
-
Personnel Subarea inheriting from Personnel Area in PPOME Transaction
Hi,
We are facing the issue in PPOME Account Assignment tab.
Whenever if we assign the personnel Area, the personnel sub area also filled with Personnel area instead of taking the corresponding PA's PSA.
Could anybody let me know, how to avoid this issue.
Thanks in Advance
Rajesh.SDear Stefan,
Thanks a lot for your information. Your solution resolved our issues.
Thanks again.
Rajesh.S -
Hi,
I need to customize the PPOME Transaction to Add the Infotypes 5010 and 5050 to one of the custom scenarios. I created the Tabs in the View T77OMTABUS and selected the Option Infotype Specific and Mentioned the Correspoding Infotypes.
In IMG, I read, for Infotypes specific tabs, we dont need to create any new screens. But, I dont get any screen for these two Infotypes.
I could not figure out, if there is still something missing in the configuration or, Does these Infotypes need any different process.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Suryakiran D.Hi Anusha,
Enter these values in HRP1001-
OTYPE: S
OBJID: Position ID
PLVAR: Current Plan
RELAT: 008
You'll get the holder of that position.
Cheers,
Donnie -
User exit or BADI for PPOME transaction
Hi all,
I need to know is there any User exit or Badi or Enhancement spot is available while saving the PPOME transaction in HR.Hi,
This is the BADI HROM_EXP_PATH
Thanks,
Shailaja Ainala. -
Restriction for PPOME transaction
Hi,
In PPOME transaction we can drag a person from one position to another position to change its position. What can be done that system will not allow user to do this, like error message that can be given through user exit or any other thing. I want user to chage any employee's position from PA40 only.
Please give me solution.
Thanks and regards,
Sameer DhukeHi.
for example with following 2 authorizations of PLOG the user could only dislay the relationship (subtype) between a position and a person and the relationship(subtype) between position and orgunit.
Field
Values
Function Code
Infotype
1001
Object Type
P,S,O
Plan Version
01
Planning Status
Subtype
A001-A002,A004-A007,A009-A999, B001-B002,B004-B007,B009-B999
Function Code
DISP
Infotype
1001
Object Type
P,S,O
Plan Version
01
Planning Status
Subtype
A003,A008, B003,B008
I hope this gives you an idea of the solution.
Regards
Bernd -
Authorization issue on SHD0 transaction variant in R/3
Hi,
Can anyone help me on the below issue?
Created a transaction variant ZME31K using SHD0 on R/3 system with the base transaction ME31K.
And created a transaction ZME31K for the above transaction variant.
Created one ID which has access only to transaction ZME31K.
But when tried to create contract using ZME31K, it allows to create the contract, but ended up with message "You are not authorized to use ME31K".
Anyone faced similar issue before? how this can be resolved? As per the busniess requirement, they can provide access only to the transaction variant for the user and they will not be assigned to ME31K.
-Thanks,> We are doing an Upgrade assessment wherein at R/3 side, the system is being upgraded from 4.6 to ECC 6.0.
> I wanted to know the impact the Change in Transactions at R/3 side.. namely transactions..
> AS02, CT02, F-02, F-41, F-49, FB01 would have on BW.
What do you mean? I don't get your question. What impact should those transaction have on BI?
Markus -
Issue in MD04 transaction with exception message 26
Dear All,
I am facing 2 issues:
1) Even if the sales order line is confirmed and fulfilled, we are getting the stock for that material against the same sales order in the MMBE Transaction.
2) For the above material present in those sales Order which are confirmed and fulfilled, We are getting the entries for that material in Transaction MD04 ( Stock requirement list of the material after we run the MRP for a particular materia) with the exception message 26.
From our end, we have used the report sdrqcr21 which delete the wrong entries from "VBBE" so that MD04 will show incorrect entries but this approach is not helping us in the above situation.
Regards,
RakeshRakesh,
This is one issue. There is nothing wrong with the software, this is standard behavior. You have built or procured more stock than was required by the sales order. The remaining unnecessary stock is now sitting in inventory, and is displayed in MD04 under the Sales order segment. This stock can never be used again within SAP, unless someone re-opens the sales order or performs some transaction to remove the stock from being 'Sales order on hand' stock.
Some companies will scrap this material, using their standard scrapping policies. Others will transfer this un-usable E stock to general stock, if it can actually be reused.
Rgds,
DB49 -
Issue in Material Transaction in WIP
Gratings to Guru's...
I trying to do Material issue for Discrete job components in WIP. but facing an error in MTL_TRANSACTIONS_INTERFACE. below are the error details.
Error Msg : ‘Requirement is this job/schedule's primary assembly’
Error Code : inventory_item_id.
I am using below insert statement.(able to do material transaction through front end also Similar kind of data for other organization is working fine).
insert into mtl_transactions_interface
( source_code,
source_line_id,
source_header_id,
process_flag,
validation_required,
transaction_mode,
lock_flag,
last_update_date,
last_updated_by,
creation_date,
created_by,
inventory_item_id,
organization_id,
transaction_quantity,
primary_quantity,
transaction_uom,
transaction_date,
subinventory_code,
locator_id,
transaction_source_id,
transaction_source_type_id,
transaction_action_id,
transaction_type_id,
transaction_reference,
wip_entity_type,
operation_seq_num,
bom_revision_date,
routing_revision_date,
scheduled_flag,
final_completion_flag,
Flow_schedule,
--revision,
transaction_interface_id
values (
1, --source code
1, -- source line id
-1, -- source header id
1, -- process flag
1, -- validation required
3, -- transaction mode
2, -- lock flag
sysdate, -- last update date
-1, -- last updated by
sysdate, -- creation date
-1, -- created by
62481, -- inventory item id --*
414, -- org id*
-30, -- transaction quantity
-30, -- primary quantity
'EA', -- transaction uom *
sysdate, -- transaction date
'UKDIE', -- subinventory code*
47473, --locator_id *
4368857, -- transaction source id *
5, -- transaction source type id
31, -- transaction action id
35, -- transaction type id
'test', -- transaction reference
1, -- wip entity type
10, -- operation seq num
sysdate, -- bom revision date
sysdate, -- routing revision date
2, -- scheduled flag
'N', --final_completion_flag
'N', -- flow schedule
--'0' , -- Revision
15375520 --interface_id *
delete from mtl_transaction_lots_interface
where TRANSACTION_INTERFACE_ID = 15375519
/*2. Data inserting into mtl_transaction_lots_interface */
insert into mtl_transaction_lots_interface
(TRANSACTION_INTERFACE_ID,
SOURCE_CODE,
SOURCE_LINE_ID,
LAST_UPDATE_DATE,
LAST_UPDATED_BY,
CREATION_DATE,
CREATED_BY,
LOT_NUMBER,
TRANSACTION_QUANTITY,
ERROR_CODE,
PROCESS_FLAG)
values(
15375520,--interface_id, *
1, -- Source Code
1, -- Source Line id
sysdate, -- Last update date
-1, -- Last updated by
sysdate, -- Creation Date
-1, -- Created By
'PID0190454', -- Lot number Needs input *
-30, -- Transaction Quantity
NULL,
1 -- Process Flag
Please help me ....
Thanks in advance
BalajiIt seems that 62481 may be the inventory_item_id of the assembly. Make sure you use the inventory_item_id of the component when inserting into mtl_transactions_interface.
Sandeep Gandhi -
Urgent Issue in FBL5N transaction
Hi Experts,
I need your very urgent help.
I am executing FBL5N then enter inputs as 'Customer Account' , 'Company Code' and Check "Check Box: Parked Items and Open key date "today's date". Rest of the input fields are left blank. Press F8
I see Customer Line Item display as expected.
Now Issue begins here. In Quality, When I double click on any line item...It opens *Display parked customer invoice XXXXX( Transaction FV73,Program SAPMF05A Sub-Screen SAPLFDCB)
In Production, When I double click on any line item...It opens Display Parked Document : Overview ( Transaction FBL5N ,Program SAPLF040 Screen 700)
Could anybody please let me know...Why is such dual behavior of system. For same double click on Customer item line, SAP is displaying the different screen in quality and different one in Production.
Thanks in Advance.
RatneshThis is a user specific setting
Ask the user to go to FB00 transaction,
In that go to the line item tab and there you will find a setting "Item selection goes to", select the option you want there and the system will change the behaviour.
Thanks
Naveen -
Vendor number range issue in BUCF transaction
Hi,
We are implementing the SRM 5.0 with Extended Classic scenario. I my current SRM system is already connected with 3 SAP R/3 system and I am implementing and adding 4th SAP R/3 system.
I am having an issue to replicating the vendor master from 4th R/3 system to our SRM system due to wrong number ranges in BUCF transaction code.
Current Number Range in SRM systems are:-
01 0010000000 0014999999 10003009
AB 0001000000 0009999999 X --> (7 Digits)
My new vendor master from 4th R/3 system is:-
0080000001 to 0080029999 --> (8 Digits)
My new vendor master number range is overlapping with my internal number range 01. As we know that we cannot reduce the lower range of 01 from 0010000000 to 0000000001. Also I cannot increase the number AB higher value from 0009999999 to 0099999999.
Can you any one please suggest me to correct the number range?
Thanks,
SenthilHello Senthill,
The vendor replication to external number ranges works as follows:-
(1) Cross-Application Components SAP Business Partner > Business Partne
> Basic Settings > Number Ranges and Groupings > Define Number Ranges
Here you sould define an external number range which corresponds to
the R/3 numbers. You may want to have more than one external range
in order to replicate all vendors.
(2) Cross-Application Components > SAP Business Partner > Business Part
> Basic Settings > Number Ranges and Groupings > Define Groupings and
Assign Number Ranges
For each replication run, you can download the vendors which correspond
to the external number range / grouping which is marked as 'standard
external'.
So, you will have to replicate your vendors separately for each number
range:-
Select the correct grouping each time by marking 'Ext.Std Grping'
and then run BBPGETVD for the vendors to be assigned to this grouping.
As standard, the customized settings for the number ranges
would have to be changed for each run of BBPGETVD and BBP_VENDOR_SYNC.
If you run the update or synchronization in combination with a
BADI the intervals could be taken into account.
The BADI is BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP
The methods are:-
Method: PREPARE_REPLICATION_DATA (intitial download)
Method: PREPARE_UPDATE_DATA (update)
Import data is stored in CT_LFA1 should be copied to an
internal table. There the required intervals can be determined.
This BADI is not assigned in the IMG but can be seen through SE18.
I hope this information is helpful.
Kind Regards,
Edel. -
Startroutine issue when updating transactional DSO from parallel process
Hi
I have the following issue.
In a start routine i do some processing of data. In some cases errors missing master data creates a potiential error but does not stop the processing. What i want to achieve is the following.
I have created a transactional DSO where i want to update information about the records where issues is found in processing. I use a standard ABAP modify statement to update the DSO. This works fine when i run the DTP in 1 batch process but i get errors when i run the DTP in parallel. The problem is related to the database locking of the DSO table. I have tried to play around with ENQUEUE but cant get it right.
Any input to get this to work in parallel would be appreciated.
/ChrisHi ,
fiscal year variant, go into Customizing for Financial Accounting (FI) under Financial Accounting Global Settings >>>Fiscal Year >>>Maintain Fiscal Year Variant.
check this link ..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm41/helpdata/en/50/0d89f2ad919c40b95b9ae7583c8c96/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm41/helpdata/en/50/0d89f2ad919c40b95b9ae7583c8c96/content.htm
Regards,
shikha -
Hi sap fans,
I got one issue on mb21 ( material reservation) my client saying that while doing purchase order for every material backend one
reservation number generates automatically this reservation number automatically updates to eket, rseb table
but here my client doing reservation for same purchase order materials using
mb21 transaction in there for all materials only one reservation number will generate.
so did bdc like this fethched ekko,ekpo ,eket ,resb using given ebeln number then passed these matirials to mb21 recorded transaction but the drawback is ebeln,and ebelp fields are not available to store these values in mb21 transaction
so my client gave men another modification is if he change purchase order quantity we have compare the difference of quantity using porder material with mb21 generated reservation then do reservation for that difference quantity only else modify that quantity using mb21 transaction
mb21 generated reservation number we cant get ebeln and ebelp values so how to resolve this issue
Regards
Udaya Bhasker Bandihi This is issue is aswered
Maybe you are looking for
-
I am unable to update my itunes. I received the following message. "An app has made an attempt to load the C runtime librarhy incorrecly. Showed this number R6034 " It stated contact the applications support team. Tried again and received Error 7 win
-
Employee Vendor and Third Party Vendor Posting Issue
Dear Experts, I have an issue while Posting of Employee Vendor and Third Party Vendor. In T706K table, maintained symbolic account offset entry MJ90 Wage Type but its asking for Symbolic Exp account too. Otherwise, while posting its says Trip has no
-
Hi all, I am using URI XPath queries on 9i. I do not have permission on the database or database server to create any Stored Procedures, Servlets or anything else that I could possibly use to help me. I have firewall access on ports 80 and 8080 ONLY.
-
How can I download iPhoto?
I recently purchased a Macbook Pro early 2008 model running OS 10.7.3. I wanted to use iCloud and needed to upgrade iPhoto from 9.1 to 9.2. The computer and the app store would not let this happen, saying that I had 9.2 already (I didn't). I was told
-
Does anyone have any idea when the next version of iWeb is comming out? I love this little tool but I may have to switch soon if a new version does come out supporting us non .MAC publishers. It is driving me nuts: 1) Having to FTP all my files every