Issue in PPOME transaction

Hi Experts,
I am able to see an employee in PPOME under 'person' search, but the same employee is not getting reflected under 'user' search.
Pls let me know what could be the possible reason and how to get it reflected.Thanks.
Regards,
Rams

Hi,
Please verify if you can see the same in PP01 transaction as there are issues generally when you create any relationship or object in PPOCE/PPOME transaction.
If you cannot see in PP01 create one and then try, may be you can now see the same.
Thanks,
Ameet

Similar Messages

  • Want to add new ICON to PPOME transaction plz suggest the procedure

    Hi friends,
    In my requriement, I want to add one ICON to PPOME transaction, in Basic Data tab section. I want some user action also to be performed.
    Please suggest me how to tackle this issue.
    Thanks in advance,
    Phani Shankar.K

    Please check Hararkey frame work in IMG
    SPRO> Personnel Administration> Organizational Management>harrekey frame work.

  • 2 issues with call transaction to LS24

    Hello All,
    There are 2 issues with call transaction to LS24.
    <b>1) It doesn't take batch value and displays stock for all batches.
    2) When you go back, it doesn't go back to the calling program.</b>
    Any thoughts ?
    <u>Here is my code:</u>
    PARAMETERS: p_lgnum TYPE lgnum,
                p_matnr TYPE matnr,
                p_werks TYPE werks_d,
                p_lgort TYPE lgort_d,
                p_charg TYPE charg_d.
    START-OF-SELECTION.
    END-OF-SELECTION.
      PERFORM display_stock_per_batch.
    *&      Form  DISPLAY_STOCK_PER_BATCH
    FORM display_stock_per_batch .
      SET PARAMETER ID 'LGN' FIELD p_lgnum.
      SET PARAMETER ID 'MAT' FIELD p_matnr.
      SET PARAMETER ID 'WRK' FIELD p_werks.
      SET PARAMETER ID 'LAG' FIELD p_lgort.
      SET PARAMETER ID 'CHA' FIELD p_charg.
      CALL TRANSACTION 'LS24' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
    ENDFORM.                    " DISPLAY_STOCK_PER_BATCH

    hello
    use this code
    perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPML01S' '0209'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                                  'RL01S-CHARG'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                                  '/00'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-LGNUM'
                                  p_lgnum.
    perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-MATNR'
                                  p_matnr.
    perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-WERKS'
                                  p_werks.
    perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-LGORT'
                                  p_lgort.
    perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-BESTQ'
    perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-SOBKZ'
    perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-CHARG'
                                  p_charg.
    perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPML01S' '0209'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                                  '/EBACK'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                                  'RL01S-LGNUM'.
    perform bdc_transaction using 'LS24'.
    may be it will help u

  • Problem with Period selection in PPOME transaction!

    Dear All,
    I have a very strange problem while selecting the time period in the PPOME transaction.
    While selecting the  "date and forecast period" option from the "settings" option in the menu bar, the time period in the preview the PPOME transaction must show as 3 months by default. But for my user ID when i select the preview period, the month field is displayed as blank and the end date is always defaulted to current date.
    Is this time period coming from any configuration? I would like to know is there any way to by which we can change and save the time period settings.
    Thanks,
    sridharan

    Goto PE03->ABKRS in Change mode. You will be able to uncheck or check the fields.

  • Personnel Subarea inheriting from Personnel Area in PPOME  Transaction

    Hi,
      We are facing the issue in PPOME Account Assignment tab.
    Whenever if we assign the personnel Area, the personnel sub area also filled with Personnel area instead of taking the corresponding PA's PSA.
    Could anybody let me know, how to avoid this issue.
    Thanks in Advance
    Rajesh.S

    Dear Stefan,
          Thanks a lot for your information. Your solution resolved our issues.
    Thanks again.
    Rajesh.S

  • PPOME Transaction

    Hi,
    I need to customize the PPOME Transaction to Add the Infotypes 5010 and 5050 to one of the custom scenarios. I created the Tabs in the View T77OMTABUS and  selected the Option Infotype Specific and Mentioned the Correspoding Infotypes.
    In IMG, I read, for Infotypes specific tabs, we dont need to create any new screens. But, I dont get any screen for these two Infotypes.
    I could not figure out, if there is still something missing in the configuration or, Does these Infotypes need any different process.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks,
    Suryakiran D.

    Hi Anusha,
    Enter these values in HRP1001-
    OTYPE: S
    OBJID: Position ID
    PLVAR: Current Plan
    RELAT: 008
    You'll get the holder of that position.
    Cheers,
    Donnie

  • User exit or BADI for PPOME transaction

    Hi all,
    I need to know is there any User exit or Badi or Enhancement spot is available while saving the PPOME transaction in HR.

    Hi,
    This is the BADI HROM_EXP_PATH
    Thanks,
    Shailaja Ainala.

  • Restriction for PPOME transaction

    Hi,
         In PPOME transaction we can drag a person from one position to another position to change its position. What can be done that system will not allow user to do this, like error message that can be given through user exit or any other thing. I want user to chage any employee's position from PA40 only.
    Please give me solution.
    Thanks and regards,
    Sameer Dhuke

    Hi.
    for example with following 2 authorizations of PLOG the user could only dislay the relationship (subtype) between a position and a person and the relationship(subtype) between position and orgunit.
    Field                                                         
      Values                                                                               
    Function Code                                                 
    Infotype                                                      
      1001
    Object Type                                                   
      P,S,O
    Plan Version                                                  
      01                                                          
    Planning Status                                               
    Subtype                                                       
      A001-A002,A004-A007,A009-A999,  B001-B002,B004-B007,B009-B999                                                               
    Function Code                                                 
      DISP                                                           
    Infotype                                                      
      1001
    Object Type                                                   
      P,S,O
    Plan Version                                                  
      01                                                          
    Planning Status                                               
    Subtype                                                       
      A003,A008,  B003,B008                                                               
    I hope this gives you an idea of the solution.
    Regards
    Bernd

  • Authorization issue on SHD0 transaction variant in R/3

    Hi,
    Can anyone help me on the below issue?
    Created a transaction variant ZME31K using SHD0 on R/3 system with the base transaction ME31K.
    And created a transaction ZME31K for the above transaction variant.
    Created one ID which has access only to transaction ZME31K.
    But when tried to create contract using ZME31K, it allows to create the contract, but ended up with message  "You are not authorized to use ME31K".
    Anyone faced similar issue before? how this can be resolved? As per the busniess requirement, they can provide access only to the transaction variant for the user and they will not be assigned to ME31K.
    -Thanks,

    > We are doing an Upgrade assessment wherein at R/3 side, the system is being upgraded from 4.6 to ECC 6.0.
    > I wanted to know the impact the Change in Transactions at R/3 side..  namely transactions..
    > AS02, CT02, F-02, F-41, F-49, FB01 would have on BW.
    What do you mean? I don't get your question. What impact should those transaction have on BI?
    Markus

  • Issue in MD04 transaction with exception message 26

    Dear All,
    I am facing 2 issues:
    1) Even if the sales order line is confirmed and fulfilled, we are getting the stock for that material against the same sales order in the MMBE Transaction.
    2) For the above material present in those sales Order which are confirmed and fulfilled, We are getting the entries for that material in Transaction MD04 ( Stock requirement list of the material after we run the MRP for a particular materia) with the exception message 26.
    From our end, we have used the report sdrqcr21 which delete the wrong entries from "VBBE" so that MD04 will show incorrect entries but this approach is not helping us in the above situation.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    Rakesh,
    This is one issue.  There is nothing wrong with the software, this is standard behavior. You have built or procured more stock than was required by the sales order.  The remaining unnecessary stock is now sitting in inventory, and is displayed in MD04 under the Sales order segment.  This stock can never be used again within SAP, unless someone re-opens the sales order or performs some transaction to remove the stock from being 'Sales order on hand' stock.
    Some companies will scrap this material, using their standard scrapping policies.  Others will transfer this un-usable E stock to general stock, if it can actually be reused.
    Rgds,
    DB49

  • Issue in Material Transaction in WIP

    Gratings to Guru's...
    I trying to do Material issue for Discrete job components in WIP. but facing an error in MTL_TRANSACTIONS_INTERFACE. below are the error details.
    Error Msg : ‘Requirement is this job/schedule's primary assembly’
    Error Code : inventory_item_id.
    I am using below insert statement.(able to do material transaction through front end also Similar kind of data for other organization is working fine).
    insert into mtl_transactions_interface
    ( source_code,
    source_line_id,
    source_header_id,
    process_flag,
    validation_required,
    transaction_mode,
    lock_flag,
    last_update_date,
    last_updated_by,
    creation_date,
    created_by,
    inventory_item_id,
    organization_id,
    transaction_quantity,
    primary_quantity,
    transaction_uom,
    transaction_date,
    subinventory_code,
    locator_id,
    transaction_source_id,
    transaction_source_type_id,
    transaction_action_id,
    transaction_type_id,
    transaction_reference,
    wip_entity_type,
    operation_seq_num,
    bom_revision_date,
    routing_revision_date,
    scheduled_flag,
    final_completion_flag,
    Flow_schedule,
    --revision,                   
    transaction_interface_id
    values (
    1, --source code
    1, -- source line id
    -1, -- source header id
    1, -- process flag
    1, -- validation required
    3, -- transaction mode
    2, -- lock flag
    sysdate, -- last update date
    -1, -- last updated by
    sysdate, -- creation date
    -1, -- created by
    62481, -- inventory item id --*
    414, -- org id*
    -30, -- transaction quantity
    -30, -- primary quantity
    'EA', -- transaction uom *
    sysdate, -- transaction date
    'UKDIE', -- subinventory code*
    47473, --locator_id  *
    4368857, -- transaction source id *
    5, -- transaction source type id
    31, -- transaction action id
    35, -- transaction type id
    'test', -- transaction reference
    1, -- wip entity type
    10, -- operation seq num
    sysdate, -- bom revision date
    sysdate, -- routing revision date
    2, -- scheduled flag
    'N', --final_completion_flag
    'N', -- flow schedule
    --'0' , -- Revision
    15375520 --interface_id *
    delete from mtl_transaction_lots_interface
    where TRANSACTION_INTERFACE_ID = 15375519
    /*2. Data inserting into mtl_transaction_lots_interface */
    insert into mtl_transaction_lots_interface
    (TRANSACTION_INTERFACE_ID,
    SOURCE_CODE,
    SOURCE_LINE_ID,
    LAST_UPDATE_DATE,
    LAST_UPDATED_BY,
    CREATION_DATE,
    CREATED_BY,
    LOT_NUMBER,
    TRANSACTION_QUANTITY,
    ERROR_CODE,
    PROCESS_FLAG)
    values(
    15375520,--interface_id, *
    1, -- Source Code
    1, -- Source Line id
    sysdate, -- Last update date
    -1, -- Last updated by
    sysdate, -- Creation Date
    -1, -- Created By
    'PID0190454', -- Lot number Needs input *
    -30, -- Transaction Quantity
    NULL,
    1 -- Process Flag
    Please help me ....
    Thanks in advance
    Balaji

    It seems that 62481 may be the inventory_item_id of the assembly. Make sure you use the inventory_item_id of the component when inserting into mtl_transactions_interface.
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • Urgent Issue in FBL5N transaction

    Hi Experts,
    I need your very urgent help.
    I am executing FBL5N then enter inputs as  'Customer Account' , 'Company Code' and Check "Check Box: Parked Items and Open key date "today's date". Rest of the input fields are left blank. Press F8
    I see Customer Line Item display as expected.
    Now Issue begins here. In Quality, When I double click on any line item...It opens *Display parked customer invoice XXXXX( Transaction FV73,Program SAPMF05A Sub-Screen SAPLFDCB)
    In Production, When I double click on any line item...It opens  Display Parked  Document : Overview  ( Transaction FBL5N ,Program SAPLF040  Screen 700)
    Could anybody please let me know...Why is such dual behavior of system. For same double click on Customer item line, SAP is displaying the different screen in quality and different one in Production.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Ratnesh

    This is a user specific setting
    Ask the user to go to FB00 transaction,
    In that go to the line item tab and there you will find a setting "Item selection goes to", select the option you want there and the system will change the behaviour.
    Thanks
    Naveen

  • Vendor number range issue in BUCF transaction

    Hi,
    We are implementing the SRM 5.0 with Extended Classic scenario.  I my current SRM system is already connected with 3 SAP R/3 system and I am implementing and adding 4th SAP R/3 system.
    I am having an issue to replicating the vendor master from 4th R/3 system to our SRM system due to wrong number ranges in BUCF transaction code.
    Current Number Range in SRM systems are:-
    01     0010000000            0014999999     10003009
    AB     0001000000        0009999999                        X     --> (7 Digits)
    My new vendor master from 4th R/3 system is:-
    0080000001        to     0080029999    -->  (8 Digits)
    My new vendor master number range is overlapping with my internal number range 01.  As we know that we cannot reduce the lower range of 01 from 0010000000 to 0000000001.  Also I cannot increase the number AB higher value from 0009999999 to 0099999999.
    Can you any one please suggest me to correct the number range?
    Thanks,
    Senthil

    Hello Senthill,
    The vendor replication to external number ranges works as follows:-
    (1) Cross-Application Components SAP Business Partner > Business Partne
    > Basic Settings > Number Ranges and Groupings > Define Number Ranges
    Here you sould define an external number range which corresponds to
    the R/3 numbers. You may want to have more than one external range
    in order to replicate all vendors.
    (2) Cross-Application Components > SAP Business Partner > Business Part
    > Basic Settings > Number Ranges and Groupings > Define Groupings and
    Assign Number Ranges
    For each replication run, you can download the vendors which correspond
    to the external number range / grouping which is marked as 'standard
    external'.
    So, you will have to replicate your vendors separately for each number
    range:-
    Select the correct grouping each time by marking 'Ext.Std Grping'
    and then run BBPGETVD for the vendors to be assigned to this grouping.
    As standard, the customized settings for the number ranges
    would have to be changed for each run of BBPGETVD and BBP_VENDOR_SYNC.
    If you run the update or synchronization in combination with a
    BADI the intervals could be taken into account.
    The BADI is BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP
    The methods are:-
    Method: PREPARE_REPLICATION_DATA (intitial download)
    Method: PREPARE_UPDATE_DATA (update)
    Import data is stored in CT_LFA1 should be copied to an
    internal table. There the required intervals can be determined.
    This BADI is not assigned in the IMG but can be seen through SE18.
    I hope this information is helpful.
    Kind Regards,
    Edel.

  • Startroutine issue when updating transactional DSO from parallel process

    Hi
    I have the following issue.
    In a start routine i do some processing of data. In some cases errors missing master data creates a potiential error but does not stop the processing. What i want to achieve is the following.
    I have created a transactional DSO where i want to update information about the records where issues is found in processing. I use a standard ABAP modify statement to update the DSO. This works fine when i run the DTP in 1 batch process but i get errors when i run the DTP in parallel.  The problem is related to the database locking of the DSO table. I have tried to play around with ENQUEUE but cant get it right.
    Any input to get this to work in parallel would be appreciated.
    /Chris

    Hi ,
    fiscal year variant, go into Customizing for Financial Accounting (FI) under Financial Accounting Global Settings >>>Fiscal Year >>>Maintain Fiscal Year Variant.
    check this link ..
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm41/helpdata/en/50/0d89f2ad919c40b95b9ae7583c8c96/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm41/helpdata/en/50/0d89f2ad919c40b95b9ae7583c8c96/content.htm
    Regards,
    shikha

  • Issue on mb21 transaction

    Hi sap fans,
    I got one issue on mb21 ( material reservation) my client saying that while doing purchase order for every material backend one
    reservation number generates automatically this reservation number automatically updates to eket, rseb table
    but here my client doing reservation for same purchase order materials using
    mb21 transaction in there for all materials only one reservation number will generate.
    so did bdc like this fethched ekko,ekpo ,eket ,resb using given ebeln number then passed these matirials to mb21 recorded transaction but the drawback is ebeln,and ebelp fields are not available to store these values in mb21 transaction
    so my client gave men another modification is if he change purchase order quantity we have compare the difference of quantity using porder material with mb21 generated reservation then do reservation for that difference quantity only else modify that quantity using mb21 transaction
    mb21 generated reservation number we cant get ebeln and ebelp values so how to resolve this issue
    Regards
    Udaya Bhasker Bandi

    hi This is issue is aswered

Maybe you are looking for