Issue in Return sales, condition value calculation.

Hello All,
I am creating return sales order (order type-RE) with reference to a Billing document, and reducing the quantity while creating the sales order (Example: Ref billing quantity-60 and sales order quantity-30). Here even though the quantity is reduced to 30 PC the basic excise duty value shown in the sales order is same as in the reference billing document (with 60 PC quantity).
In pricing procedure for condition type (basic Excise duty) calculation type used is 355.
Kindly help me out to over come this issue.
Regards,
Manoj

Your post is not sufficient to understand your requirement. Let me know whether your client are into TAXINJ or TAXINN. Also as requested already, share your pricing procedure screen shot. Moreover, have you checked the Analysis screen from condition tab of that sale order ? If not, better check there which will give a clear picture. Finally, ensure that there is no manual condition type JMAN used in billing document in which case, as per routine 355, system will copy that value.
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

The return statement is expected to return a conditional value: found type VARCHAR . (COR-10622)

Hi Gurus,
As I am totally new to the SAP Information Steward, Please help me in the below if condition:
BEGIN
IF($Rule_CHAR_REM LIKE ('.%')) RETURN replace_substr($Rule_CHAR_REM, '.', '', 1, 1);
END
$Rule_CHAR_REM is the parameter which i created and I need to search if the field record is starting from '.' and if it is present than remove the '.'.
Regards,
DJ

dear dj
Try this
data nPos type i.
SEARCH $Rule_CHAR_REM FOR '.'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0 .
      nPos = SY-FDPOS .
       if nPos = 0 .
           REPLACE FIRST OCCURRENCES OF '.' IN
             $Rule_CHAR_REM WITH ''.
       endif.
ENDIF.
Regards
Parveen

Issue with Sales office values in BI

Hi Team,
We have a issue with the sales office values in a BI report.
The report displays 7 sales office values for the division 01. Where as in ECC, we have only 6 sales office values exists for the same division 01.
These sales office 7 has been have been loaded on april n may months.
The master data has all the sales office values 01- 10.
Those sales office values are coming from the Infocubes, 'Billing Document Condition' & 'Open Orders'.
I have the checked the Multiprovider, Infocubes and the InfoObject and values exists.
How to proceed further and correct these values?
Appreciate your expert guidance...
Thanks
Regards
Santhosh Kumar N

Hi Krishna,
Thanks for the reply. The Sales office field is directly mapped in the transformation and does not have any routine. Its the Key field.
The Billing Document Condition infocube is being feed by the DSO '2LIS_13_VDKON - Billing Document Condn' and datasource is '2LIS_13_VDKON'.
The Open Orders infocube is being feed by the DSO Document Order item / Delivery; below which we have another 3 DSO.
1st DSO has the Datasource '2LIS_13_VDITM'
2nd DSO has the Datasource '2LIS_11_VAITM'
3rd DSO has the Datasource '2LIS_11_V_SSL'
The Sales Office 7 has txn records for the month of April & May.
The report built on top of a Multiprovider and the for the months June and July, we have txn records fine for the sales office 01 - 06.
Please help me, if i am missing anything here and make me to understand better.

CO-PA: value field correction due to miscalculated SD condition value

HI,
we are using ECC 60 SP11. Due to incorrect condition value calculation in SD this condition value (only used in CO-PA) is posted on a CO-PA value field causing wrong CO-PA results.
As the SD document (invoice) will not be changed anymore a reversal/reposting in CO-PA (ke4s) does not solve the problem.
My idea of value correction (only in CO-PA, I do not care about KEAT in that case...) is to use RKECADL1 to logical delete the old documents and to create a LSMW for ke21n to repost the documents again with the right value for the affected value field.
The question is, the document reference of the old (wrong) CO-PA document shows the billing document and its logical deleted by RKECADL1. My new document does not have a document reference to this billing document as the document source is ke21n.
Any idea how to "change" the document reference in a way that document flow for the billing document shows the ke21n-created document (with the right condition value)?? If I don not change it, document flow will not show any CO-PA document for that case (the old one is logical deleted, the ke21n-doc. is not linked to it)
I want avoid manual changes in Ce1**** as its a dirty solution and I am not completely sure if/which other tables are affected.
Best regards, Christian

The only way to effect the document flow is to cancel and repost the document. if that is not possible then KE21N - Create Line Items will fix your issue in COPA but this will not appear in billing. You can enter data fields that coonect to billing doc etc.
pts appreciated.

AFS-Retail Interface-Pricing Conditon Proces (Sales Condition - INFORECORD)

Hi Experts,
We are working on Integration between AFS and RETAIL systems.
We are facing Issue in Sending Sales conditions (VK13-VKP0) from the AFS side, Transfer over to the Retail side as INFOREORD.
What settings (Configurations) are required in AFS & Retail system ?.
When Sales conditions (VK13) are sent in AFS what is the Message Type to be Used ?.
Any Input is highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Selvakumar. M

Hello Marat,
Did you meant Pricing Info records. If yes, it need to be maintained at the AFS side. When interfacing the materials from AFS to Retail using BD10, you can use the option 'Send Material in Full' to send the prices also.
The prices can be maintained using the transaction VK11. It can be maintained on the material level and also on SKU level. When interfacing as mentioned before, INFREC and COND_A IDocs will also be generated.
Hope this address your query.
Regards
Sudha

How EK02 condition value fatches at sale Enquiary staes as a calculated

Hi
In Sales enquiary stage how system calculate EK02 condition value as caculated cost
Is there any cofig to get the value of EK02 condition for calculated cost at Enquairy stage only for forcasting
Regards
Santosh

Hi,
In our company we get the calculated cost into our sales document with the following configuration:
IMG: Plant maintenance and customer service / Maintenance and service processing / Basic settings / Quotation creation and billing / ODP4 - Assign conditions to sales document types
With this configuration, we assign the calculated cost condition (EK02) to the corresponding sales document. The system sends the calculated costs from the order to the corresponding sales order created.
Regards,
Óscar
http://blogdesap.blogspot.com

Condition value of JMOD not appearing in the sales order.

Hi all,
Im encountering a peculiar situation where the conditon value of JMOD is not showing up in the sales order..It is however showing the tax rate.. Pls suggest.
thanks and regards
Joe

Hi joseph
some soution for you I googled for you
one example like yours i am just copying and providing info for you i dont know whether i can copy link or not here
here is the solution
I'm using TAXINJ procedure with JFACT as the pricing procedure for sales.
Here, I've maintained in FTXP, for IN00 and taxcode V1(new one defined),
taxes as desired and JMOD = 16%, AED as 2%.
But these values are not getting picked up in the pricing in sales order.
I'm keeping UTXJ correctly. I tried with % of UTXJ with 100%.
In the pricing analysis, I see that the condition record for JMOD is found correctly with 16%.
But it appears in the condition items as 0%
solution:
Check whether you have maintained the tax classification in material master and also check whether u have defined the same tax classification in VK11 for UTXJ, where u assign the Tax code.
Also check for customer tax classification. And check what you have maintained in J1ID. System will first search for values from J1ID, and then in FTXP.
And have you a sales pricing condition like JEX2 which is a copy of JMOD ? The value of JEX2 gets posted for Excise account key. This ensures that the cost accounting of excise value paid is done correctly - account key EX2.
I'm maintaining TAX classifications correctly in the material master, customer master and final tax classification for plant also is set correctly.
As I told, JIN1, JIN2, JIN4,JIN5 are picked up correctly and calculated. Problem is only for Excise.
And these values are getting copied initially, before I put PR00 manually.
Once I put PR00, all the conditions are set to zero back
Then after entering the price manually, u do the update pricing in Conditions View.
See, I have not altered any thing in the standard JFACT procedure. That means sales condition is there for JMOD to enable account posting..
Now, I've changed Tax category in OVK1, and put UTXJ alone there and now, JMOD is getting picked up and is calculating the value..
But note that I've maintained 10% as JMOD in FTXP.. and 8% in the J1ID excise rate maintenance for chapter ID.
Can I do away with Excise rate maintenance for chapter ID. So that I will get the % maintained in the FTXP..
did the tax code pick up correctly... did u maintain the chapter Id and excise rate fro teh chapter ID
I could solve the proble..
In the excise group assigned to the plant, I had to check on the indicators, SED and AED.
Hope its clear your issue.
Regards,
Krishna.

Apportion Excise value in Return Sales order

Hi,
With reference to Depot scenario, when there is a return sales order created reference to Customer Invoice, the Excise values are not getting apportioned with reference to manual change in the quantity.
As per our customized routine the excise values are copied from Excise invoice to the customer invoice, instead of condition record. And as per the copy control settings the excise values are directly copied from Customer invoice to Return sales order. But when the quantity is changed in the return sales order only the Base price is changed, but the excise invoice (condition type - JEXP) is not changed as per the changed quantity.
If i do the update price in return sales order(order type - ZRC) the excise value is picked from condition order, but as per requirement of the business they will not do the update price, only the quantity in the return sales order is changed by the user.
Can you please let us now the solution how to apportion the excise value based on changed quantity.
Regards,
Jagadish

but the excise invoice (condition type - JEXP) is not
changed as per the changed quantity.
Assuming that the Calculation Type of your above condition type is percentage, I have a feeling that unless you wrongly assigned the From-To step number in your pricing procedure, definitely, based on the quantity, your price will vary and based on this price, your ED should also get changed. So check your return depot pricing procedure once again.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Use condition type 'RC00' to process return sales order

first, I copy RC00 to RC10 and change its Calculat.type = B(Fixed amount).
second, I place a sales order to deliver 10 PC(RC10 = 10 USD) to customer and bill 8PC(RC10 = 8 USD) to customer.
third, I place a return sales order(only return 2 PC) reference to above billing but the RC10's amount is still 8 USD instead of 2 USD.
I think this is relative to Cond.base value and Cond.control = F(Condition value fixed (billed)) and who can tell me how to realize my purpose?
tks in advance.

Hi
Guess, If you do returns again for two more pieces, again it will determine the same value for RC10.
Please look into the areas of 'copy controls - price type' field and also the Calculation type (fixed amount) also.
Thanks,
Ravi

Conditions in Purchase Order - No scroll bar/Sales Tax value not in mmr

Hello,
I am stuck in a weird problem where I have created a Condition Calculation Schema, assigned it to Schema group and assigned that schema to vendor, but when i open my condition in the PO, it does not give me scroll bar i.e. I have calculation Schema with around 10+ conditions, but when I try to put all the conditions in PO at one time, the scroll bar doesnot come up and without it, I cannot view all my conditions in the PO. Its saving the conditions though as seen in report, but cannot display it in PO without the scroll bar. Any ideas?
Another assignment is that sales tax value and % should not increase the mmr value at time of GR, but when I do GR its adding the sales tax value to mmr value, my requirement is just Gross price be added to mmr, not sales tax value/%. I tried the Statistical checks in Calculation Schema, but to no vail, at GR the sales tax value is being added to the mmr record. Any ideas?
Lots of points awarded for answer/answers.
Any clue will help
Thank you/Afshad
Edited by: Afshad Irani on Jan 14, 2009 10:27 AM
Edited by: Afshad Irani on Jan 14, 2009 2:32 PM
Edited by: Afshad Irani on Jan 15, 2009 6:19 AM

Q Another assignment is that sales tax value and % should not increase the mmr value at time of GR.
Ans:
Dear Afshad,
Reference to your question, you need to do few settings in your Condition Type and Pricing Schema, if you need Sales Tax value & % not to include in your Material value.
1 - In SPRO, Check that in your condition type, Control data 2 tab, Accruals check box should not be selected.
2 - In your Calculation Schema, against your condition types for Sales Tax % and Sales Tax Value, select the check box for Manual & Statistics.
3 - Also in your Calculation Schema, you should not select any account key in AccKey (Account Key) and in Accruals colomns.
If any one of these setting is not defined, the valuation price for your material will be increased due to the fact that your settings for Condition type and Calculation Schema is allowing the same to hit the value of your material directly.
Hope it works for you.
Regards
Jibran

Fm to change the condition value in sales order pricing

Hi Friends,
I need a FM to change the Pricing value that is auto calculated in the sales order. It needs to be overwritten. BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE I don't think will do it. It can be used only to update the condition type and the condition amount but not the condition value.
Can someone please help me. I've been stuck with this for quite sometime.
Thanks,
Dikshitha G

Try these BAPI's
BAPI_LISTING_CONDITIONS,
BAPI_AGREEMENTS
Regards,
Rajasekhar Reddy.

Manipulating condition value after being returned from IPC

Hi all,
How can we manipulate the condition rate data after the value is returned from IPC?
We tried using CRM_PRICING_I_BADI calling the method CRM_PRICING_I_MERGE. But it did not solve the issue.
Requirement is to read the data of a particular condition type from a preceedign document and then overwirte the conditon value of condition type in the current transaction with that old value from previous document.
Can this be achieved without using Java coding and manipulate the value after IPC has returned the conditon value and before it is being presented on GUI?
Please help me with your suggestions.
Regards,
David.

Hello david,
You might ned to use the user Exit provided by the Pricing Engine to work this out. this will require Java coding.
Regards,
Tanu

Tax condition value is not calculating based on condition rate maintained

Hi,
I have maintained the condition rate as 4% for a condition type against a tax code in FV11. and also the validity period is correct.
But when I select the tax code in purchase order and click on taxes button, some other condition value is coming in condition value field for that condition type. for example the PO price is 100Rs. the condition value has to be 4% on 100Rs that is 4Rs. but some constant value is coming 5, even if change the condition rate in FV11 as 0%, the condition value is coming as 5 only.
Does anybody faced this issue.??

Hi
for example the PO price is 100Rs. the condition value has to be 4% on 100Rs that is 4Rs. but some constant value is coming 5, even if change the condition rate in FV11 as 0%, the condition value is coming as 5 only.
try this
change your PO value and then observed the changes ,IF then your are getting value different than 5 ,then i think there is no problem in your tax procedure because you are saying after 0% in FV11 also your are get 5 only in PO
as per me you can not put any constant value in tax procedure ,we only map how tax calculation will below for condition
and check your condition record for that vat condition again in FV13
Regads
Kailas ugale

At time of return depot invoice creation , not capture Excise Condition Value

Hi,
my queastion is that
In retun process from Customer to Depot,
when user create return Depot invoice through t-code VF01 then Not capture Excise Condition Value ( JEXP - Basic Excise Duty , JCEP- Edu. Cess Duty and JA1X - Additional tax. ) at time of Depot. Invoice Creation.
we can also check Table J_1IRG23D, in this table have value of these Excise Cond. Value.
But Delivery No. is not update in table J_1IRG23D.
and I applied condition formula 356 in Procedure ZDOM02 ( Traders Pricing Procedure).
How can capture condition value of JEXP, JCEP and JA1X at time of Retrun Depot Invoice Creation ?
Guide me .....

Hi,
I have flow your define step:
Returns from Customer to Depot
1     Create a return order in Depot
2     Key in the invoice number and execute
3     Assign Order Reason and save
4     Create a return delivery and do PGR. Maintain storage location 1030
5     Create Transfer posting in MB1B with movement type 453, storage location 1030 and save
6     Note down the material document reference
7     Go to J1IG to reverse excise issue posting
8     Click "Capture"
9     Key in the material document number and series group
10     Click "Details". Now select the line item and again click "More documents"
11     Key in the original excise invoice reference created at supplying plant
12     Skip all warning message and go back
13     Maintain the internal number and the year.
14     With this, entry from RG23D will be reversed
But still the excise condition values are not being captured during invoice VF01 and std depot routing 356 is being used.
Program name of depot routing is FV64A356.
we can also check Table J_1IRG23D, in this table have value of these Excise Cond. Value.
But Delivery No. is not update in table J_1IRG23D.
Guide me.........

In Sales enquiary stage how system calculate EK02 condition value as cacula

Hi
In Sales enquiary stage how system calculate EK02 condition value as caculated cost
Is there any cofig to get the value of EK02 condition for calculated cost at Enquairy stage only for forcasting
Regards
Santosh

Hi,
In our company we get the calculated cost into our sales document with the following configuration:
IMG: Plant maintenance and customer service / Maintenance and service processing / Basic settings / Quotation creation and billing / ODP4 - Assign conditions to sales document types
With this configuration, we assign the calculated cost condition (EK02) to the corresponding sales document. The system sends the calculated costs from the order to the corresponding sales order created.
Regards,
Óscar
http://blogdesap.blogspot.com

Issue in Return sales, condition value calculation.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for