Issue on Reprint of Purchase Order - Top Prority

Dear Friends,
Plz., could some one help me out on this issue. The PO was issued, MIGO done, MIRO was completed. Then the management has decided to reverse the documents. Hence I reversed the FI docs, Cancel the MIGO, then flagged the deletion indicator for PO.
Now i want the PO print out but i can not get it...Then i removed the deletion flag and saved. Now i want the print out. The yellow indicator was apperaing in Out put Screen but when I saved the Indicator does not goto Green light ( I can not get the print out).
Can some one help me out ---its urgent....
Thanks & Regards,
BRP.

Hi Subbu,
Were do you check print out.can you use spool request only.if not check onece
fot that T-code is SP02
if it is ok check purchase order condition type.what it is maintained check ones problem comes there only
Hope this helps you
Prem.

Similar Messages

Goods Issue with reference to Purchase Order

Hi MM Gurus,
Is there any settings to do Goods Issue with reference to Purchase order?
I want to capture the material price in purchase order during goods issue instead of standard price or moving average price.
Thanks in advance
Dinesh

Hello Dinesh,
Batch valuation is similar to split valuation. Here is the link on how batch valuation works.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/25/283db54f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/content.htm
Please check in sandbox environment before using.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Issue with service line purchase orders.

Hi Experts,
    We have recently upgraded to following pack levels -
System                                 Pack level
ECC 6.0          17, EHP4 Stack 7
SRM 5.0          17
There is an issue around purchase order change. If an existing PO is edited and a new line is added to the PO it appears fine in SRM system. But on replicating to backend, we see that the newly added line has been duplicated i.e. appears twice thereby reflecting incorrect value.
This is happening for Service line items. Has anyone had similar issue at their end ? I tried to search SAP Notes but found nothing relevant to our issue.
Any pointers / suggestions would be much appreciated.
Thanks
RB

Hi
Before going to SAP, Check the data being passed to ECC from SRM. Activate the BAPI_PO_CREATE1 for creating data in test directory instead of posting the documnet. then check the data in BAPI Segments, if the data is proper there then there is some problem in ECC 6 ehp 4 which need to be highlighted to SAP, otherwise its a problem in sending the data from SRM to ECC.
OSS Note for creating test data is - Note 539978 - Automatic generation of BAPI test data directory
Regards
Virender Singh

SubContractor issue not updated in purchase order history

Hi Masters
Can anybody explain me why the material document regarding the material issued to sub contractor is not updated in the purchase order history?
Is it a Standard one or anything missing in the configuration?
Regards
Mohan

Hi
Transfer posting to vendor account is nothing but your material lies in vendor area. but liability is with u.
This u can view thro MMBE, in that particular material lies with the vendor qty it will show.
In ME2O, u can list out what are the material lying in vendor yard.
So transfer posting to vendor will not reflect in PO history.Pls check.
Regards,
Raman

Goods Issue Qty More than Purchase Order Qty ( Intercompany Stock trans. PO

Hi All,
I have following Issue,
I can do Goods Issue more than qty which is in Intercompany stock transport
purchase Order.
I want to restrict this Process, It should not allow more than PO Qty.
In the STPO Setting, Checking rule field is blank.Is this the reason for
the Issue.
Thanx in Advance.
Key.

Hi -
This is controlled by setting at item level in purchase order / sto creation transaction i.e, ME21N.
Go to item --> Delivery tab.
You will see under delivery tolerance and over delivery tolerance.
Please reward points if youfind this information useful.
Thanks,
Ramesh

Issue with the Framework Purchase Order

Background: Using the Framework Purchase Order in the Plant Maintenance module for external operations:
When The Framework Purchase Order is used for external services procurement with service specifications, Purchase Requisitions are created based on the quantity of services requested against the Maintenance Order. Since I am using the service specifications, limits are not used in the Framework Order.
Problem:
The system does not do any check on the quantity that is requested for a service against that in the Framework Order. Hence the PRs get created linked to the Framework Order for whatever quantity requested in the Maintenance Order. Now the vendor submits the Service Entry sheets against those PRs released with respect to the Framework Order. That time the system does not allow the SES to be posted, because it exceeded the service quantity in the Framework order service specifications. In otherwords, there is no check against the framework order service quantity, when requisitions are released against the Framework order in the Maintenance Order. The check at the the time of SES is too late causing problems for mass creation of service entry sheets and also if external data entry is done for the SES by the vendor.
Is there any setting or configuration in SAP that helps to circumvent this issue? Any suggestion will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Nebu.

Hi
M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are not set to CHECK -> Value "NO".
If the check is not set to the standard delivered SAP what is the value in SU24 ? Has it been changed to CHECK > YES or DO NOT CHECK ?
I am sure you are aware that SAP does not deliver all objects coded in the programme under AUTHORITY-CHECK Statement in the SU24 Indicators with a CHECK > YES that are in transaction ME28. SAP only deliver a fraction of the values in the proposal as YES and the rest must be maintianed by the security team as they are discovered to be relevant to your organisations need of the particular functions within the transaction.This will then keep PFCG updated with all the CHECK YES objects the next time you add transaction ME28.
In other words all the objects listed in SU24 ( that are CHECK ) for ME28 will all be coded in the programme somewhere but it depends on which bits of the functionality within ME28 you are using that determines if they are called.

Screen Layout Issue in ME21N Transaction (Purchase Order Creation)

Hi,
we had recently upgraded our system from R3 4.6'c to Version ECC 6.0
in this i had observed that earlier layout of purchase order screen is changed.
1. Material Column is not visible in default layout. however i had check in table settings of item overview Screen. This Field is hidden. I tried to make it visible but didnt get success.
secondly, Pricing Schema layout at condition Tab at ITem Details level is also changed.
any idea, how to change their layout.
Regards,
Shiva

When you change the std settings that time you have to create your own variant and save in that variant and then enter that variant in variant filed and remove the use std settign check mark then you will see your fields are nothidden any more
about the pricing tab i can't help you because we are in ECC 5.0 so i don't know what u r taking

Issue with ME28 - Release Purchase Order

Dear All,
One of our user is unable to release a purchase order through Transaction code ME28.
The role is assigned only with the Transaction Code ME28 with the correct Release code and Group.
We have tested from our end and see that the Auth Objects M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are missing based on SU53. When we have added back it worked.
When i check in Su24 the Auth Obj M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are not set to CHECK -> Value "NO".
I dont understand how this Transaction is working, when the behaviour of the Transaction ME28 is to release the purchase order why is the system asking for additional Auth Objects.
please advice.
Regards

Hi
M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are not set to CHECK -> Value "NO".
If the check is not set to the standard delivered SAP what is the value in SU24 ? Has it been changed to CHECK > YES or DO NOT CHECK ?
I am sure you are aware that SAP does not deliver all objects coded in the programme under AUTHORITY-CHECK Statement in the SU24 Indicators with a CHECK > YES that are in transaction ME28. SAP only deliver a fraction of the values in the proposal as YES and the rest must be maintianed by the security team as they are discovered to be relevant to your organisations need of the particular functions within the transaction.This will then keep PFCG updated with all the CHECK YES objects the next time you add transaction ME28.
In other words all the objects listed in SU24 ( that are CHECK ) for ME28 will all be coded in the programme somewhere but it depends on which bits of the functionality within ME28 you are using that determines if they are called.

Automatic Goods Issue for Goods Receipt (Purchase Order).

Hi,
Experts - I have some newbee problem.
I have to create ZMIGO to behave like follows:
1. User enters all necessary data (like in MIGO) and posts document.
2. System creates automatic Goods Issue document based on data entered in 1. (above).
I doubt full automatic posting of GI will be possible (user has to fill in WBS for GI and possibly change "GI for project"). So my idea is to redirect user from ZMIGO (after posting) GR document to MIGO_GI and pass all necessary parameters. And thats my question: How to do it? Is it possible? Any other ideas? Maybe examples???
Will reward points to all helpful answers.
Regs,
FS

Hi,
I've created implementation for MB_DOCUMENT_BADI in se19 (named it: ZMB_DOCUMENT_BADI_1). Filled methods with code and put some break-points. Activiated methods and implementation.
When I post documents via MIGO this BADI is not executed! Why? When I've searched program SAPLMIGO for cl_exithandler only two were found: MB_MIGO_BADI and MB_MIGO_ITEM_BADI. What I have to do to activate this MB_DOCUMENT_BADI???
Points waiting for helpful answers.
REgs,
FS

Issue in EXIT_SAPMM06E_016 for Purchase Order Items

Hi,
We have customer fields in PO header as well as in Items. If i update the value in PO header, the vlaues should pass to items based up on the quantity and order unit.
We have implemented this logic in EXIT_SAPMM06E_016, this is working fine when PO have only one item. If PO has more than one items, t we have to go every PO item manaully in screen o update the values, then only value is updating in screens.
When i read about this exit EXIT_SAPMM06E_016, it says this is PBO module, so it will update only if we go manually on screens. Is there any other way to update with out going on screens?
BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST will work?

Hi
Try to use if_ex_me_process_po_cust~process_item which will work .
surya

Purchase order idoc issue

Hi,
I am facing a issue with an inbound purchase order change IDOC (message type: PORDCH).
I am getting the following error: FM VENDOR_MASTER_DATA_SELECT_15 ; no partner functions found for vendor VENDOR_MASTER_DATA_SELECT_15 1.
The vendors are configured such that they dont need a partner function. The suprising part is that the same message type idoc from the same vendor got succesfully posted a few days back and a few days after the issue was found, which means the error doesnt occur every time.
Any input is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Aparna.

Hi Aparna,
I want to make changes in an existing PO through an inbound idoc. I am using idoc type PORDCH01 and message type PORDCH, process code BAPI. But I am getting an error "Characteristic does not exist in operating concern".
Can you please explain how u are using idoc type PORDCH01??
Thanx in advance,
Shaleen

Issue while creating Purchase order (ME21N)

Hi Friends,
Hope U Have a Good Day...
My issue is while creating purchase order , I enter vendor and in org.data tab I enter Pur.Org,company code and purchase group. After entering these values if I check in communication tab, the sales person and telephone fields are filled with corresponding data.
Now my requirement is after entering Pur.Org, Company code and purchase group, and if I go and check in Communication tab, these two fields ( sales person, telephone ) should be blank.
Please help me in this issue...
Thanks & Regards
Ganesh Reddy

Hi Ganesh,
This is being fetched frm the vendor master and if u wan this field to be blank
Then u hav to remove those data frm the vendor master .
Put tat vendor, comp code n purchase org
Then select pur org data alon - >chk in purch data
u can find tat sales person n telp no being appeared in the PO
lemme know if u hav any prob in getting tat .

Issue of MOAC Functionality on Purchase Orders

Hi,
I am facing an issue of receieving a Purchase Order in OU1 that belongs to OU2.
Two Responsibilities Using are
1. Purchasing, Vision Services (USA)
2. Purchasing, Vision Operations (USA)
Setup of MO profile options for these two Responsibilities.
For, Purchasing, Vision Services (USA), MO: Security Profile is set at Responsibity Level and the definition of HRMS Security Profile lists the two Operating Units : Vision Operations, Vision Services
Now, I raised a PO in Purchasing, Vision Operations (USA), approved it and want to recieve in Purchasing, Vision Services (USA). The issue is, in Receipts form, the PO is not visible. When I enter the PO, it is saying as Invalid Value for PO_NUM.
Please help me in this.
Thanks,
Naresh Mankala

Hi Rahul,
breaking SAP standard processes cause such inconsistent data. My sencere advice is to avoid these.
You can run report RM06C020 to correct this inconsistency.
Please read very carefully the information provided in SAP note 115899 and remember that this report is intended only to be used for correction once; it should never be planned periodically as a background job.
Hencefore you should check first that all notes mentioned in SAP note 128061 have been applied in order to prevent the creation of new inconsistencies.
Sanjeev

Reprint purchase order

Hi Friends,
I am trying to reprint the purchase order using Repeat output in messages with out changing any details in the purchase order but system is not printing the line item details. It print only items which under gone change in spool. Is there any way to print all the line items even there is no change. Please suggest.
Best Regards

Hello Jaya Sree,
This is logical standard functionality to print changed purchase order only with changes instread of printing the complete purchase order.
btw, there is settings in configuration where you can setup the fields to print as output after changes. Go to SPRO --> Material Management --> Purchasing --> Messages --> fields relevent to printout of changes.
I suggest you to go through the help for this configuration node.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Frame work Purchase Order Plus Service entry sheet

Hello,
We are having the issue of defining this Purchase order process for Non receivable items i:e items which are non goods receipt like PO for services.When we create a PO with one line item and quantity of 5 and total value of PO is 500 .So after the first invoice the system is closing the PO .System is not looking at the quantity and just closing out the PO .So we have to design a process in which we need to create multiple invoice for a Po(Non GR) also we need to set the tolerence limit for the PO which i thing will be set in OMR6 (PP) and also regardless on quantity the system can create multiple invoices .So what is a good process to drive this.Either Frame work PO or service entry sheet??
Also is there a way in config we can set tolerence limit for the whole amount of PO .Like in OMR6 we define the upper and lower limit of PO .So if the total value of PO is 1000 ,while creating the invoice it vont allow us to create invoices for more than 1050 .can we set the tolerence for the whole amount of PO ?? Regardless of how many invoices we create.

Thanks Andra,
The problem is the multiple invoices is for non goods receipt item so there will be no delivery.At the time of creating a PO the GR is not checked so there will be no delivery .
Also this setting is for invoices which are comming from Vendors.But if we are genrating the invoices manually it is not blocking those invoices.Also i there is nowhere mentioned in Incomming invoice to set tolerence for incomming invoice.Are you talking about Vendor tolerences?
Thanks in advance
Edited by: Metroid01 on May 14, 2009 6:52 PM

Issue on Reprint of Purchase Order - Top Prority

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for