Issue regarding executing manual partial settlement

Hi guru:
When I am going to execute manual partial settlement via vo02 and try to change the agreement status to B,then enter shift+f12,the system said that manual payment is not allowed for this agreement type,how to fix?

And I tried to run vbof and input the rebate agreement to start,the systme indicated that new bonus procedure not active,what does it mean?

Similar Messages

Issue regarding manual partial settlement

Hi guru:
When I am doing manual partial settlement,I encoutnered below issue:
1) Tried to go to transaction vbo2,the system said that the sales volume for agreement 90 is not current
2) And I had changed the agreement status to B and press shift+F12 trying to enter the amount number to be paid,I found the max amount is 0,so it does not allow me to input any number.
How to fix above issues?

And I tried to run vbof and input the rebate agreement to start,the systme indicated that new bonus procedure not active,what does it mean?

Vendor Rebate for Partial Settlement

Hi gurus,
I need your help, I am new with some part of the Rebate process and this is my case. I have a rebate agreement where the validity date is 01.01.2009 to 31.12.2009.
We have many POs, GRs and IVs for the Vendor assigned to this agreement and the rebate agreement have one condition record with many discounts (like 10) with the validity date 01.01.2009 to 31.12.2009.
I can see the POs where the discount was applied.
The situation is that I want to execute the partial settlement for this agreement FOR today, transaction MER4.
Then, in the "Settlement date" field I have selected = 31.03.2009 and
I have the option "Perform settlement accounting" selected too (it is in the Control data:settlement run section).
But, the system is telling me "No rebate arrangement chosen" and I know that I have Invoice Verifications made, why I cannot do a partial settlement?
Could you help me please?
Kind regards,
SP
Edited by: SANDRA PALOMO on May 3, 2011 2:41 PM

Sandra,
I know this post is closed but seems like you worked on Vendor Rebate Process.I am working on this first time.I have following scenario
I have one vendor for which we like to have vendor rebate for some specific materials.. The rebate is 10% of purchases, accrued monthly, receive quarterly and we like the moving average price should be reduced by the 10% rebate.
Can you please give me some guidance ?

Manual accruals/ Partial settlement in rebates

Hi,
I have following questions sinc eiam doing rebates for first time.
1) in the billing document, the rebates are calculated as per the the accrual rates in rebates condition records. My question if the invoice is for Rs 100 and accrual rebate amt in invoice is rs 2. will the customer pay Rs 98 against this invoice of full Rs 100.
2) what happens during manual accruals. why a credit memo request is generated during manual accruals. what happens to accruals as per condition records.
3) what happens during partial settlement. do the accruals already poested gets reduced to the extent of amount of partial settlement. do manaul accruals have any role to play during partial settlement
4) what happens during final settlement. do manual accruals have any role to play during final settlement i.e. do they get reversed and what happens to accurals posted as per rebate conditon records.
regards
sachin

Dear Sachin,
1) in the billing document, the rebates are calculated as per the the accrual rates in rebates condition records. My question if the invoice is for Rs 100 and accrual rebate amt in invoice is rs 2. will the customer pay Rs 98 against this invoice of full Rs 100.
Ans --> Customer need to pay Rs 100 only , rebate amount will paied to the customer after completion of the rebate duration in between there will be partial settlement.
2) what happens during manual accruals. why a credit memo request is generated during manual accruals. what happens to accruals as per condition records.
Ans--> Manual Accruals
Use
Posting accruals manually can be useful in different situations such as:
Lump sum payments
Accruals correction
You can control at which time and for which amount the accruals should be posted.
You can build accruals for a particular condition record or reverse them in part or in full.
When you save the rebate agreement, the system will automatically create a credit memo request. The system uses this document to create a credit memo. When the credit memo is released, the accruals are posted to FI.
If you have posted accruals manually, but these have not been passed on to financial accounting, the manual accruals and manual payments in the rebate agreement are blocked.
3) what happens during partial settlement. do the accruals already poested gets reduced to the extent of amount of partial settlement. do manaul accruals have any role to play during partial settlement
Ans->Partial Settlement
Use
You can also partially settle a rebate agreement during its validity period. The amount to be paid can be limited in Customizing for Sales. Payments can be:
limited to the cumulative accruals of the condition record
limited to the amount that would be paid if final settlement were presently carried out
unlimited
You carry out partial settlement by using the manual payment screen within rebate agreement processing. On this screen you can specify the amount to be paid for each condition record.
The system will automatically create a credit memo request for the amounts specified.
It will also reverse the accruals with the credit memo if the rebate agreement type is configured accordingly. If the payment exceeds the recordu2019s accumulated accruals, the system will only reverse the accruals which are actually there.
The system gives you the opportunity to carry out additional partial settlements when previous partial settlements remain open in the form of credit memo requests or credit memos. The system always takes open documents into account when determining the maximum amount which you can pay.
When the system carries out final settlement for a rebate agreement, it takes all partial payments into account.
4) what happens during final settlement. do manual accruals have any role to play during final settlement i.e. do they get reversed and what happens to accurals posted as per rebate conditon records.
Ans-->Final settlement
Use
When you carry out final settlement of a rebate agreement, the system automatically
calculates the rebate based on the sales volume statistics or the lump sum
deducts any previously paid rebates
It then creates a credit memo request, and proposes the end date of the agreement validity period as the billing date.
The system also reverses any accruals that have been posted.
Depending on Customizing, when the system creates a credit memo request, the document is automatically blocked for billing. After approving the credit memo request, the person responsible can remove the billing block. You can then create the final credit memo.
When you want to search for credit memo requests during sales order processing, you can use the matchcode F "Credit memo request for rebate".
You can carry out final settlement of rebate agreements
automatically
Manually
as a background task (in batch)
Settling Single Rebate Agreements
You can carry out settlement directly from within a rebate agreement.
Before you save the rebate agreement you can still carry out changes to the credit memo request:
The credit memo request is only saved when you save the rebate agreement.
Carrying out Final Settlement as a Background Task
If the volume of your sales rebate processing is high, you can collectively process rebate settlements as a background task.
The following reports are available:
RV15C001
RV15C002
Your system administrator can use these reports to generate a list of rebate agreements, based on various selection criteria, such as rebate recipient, status of the agreement, and so on.
Background processing can then be carried out later. I.e., after the regular posting periods.
After a list is generated, the rebate agreements can be analyzed or processed for payment.
For more information about settling rebates as a background task, see your system administrator.
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Rebate partial settlement

Hello Experts
Is it possible to apply the scales based on the rebates during partial settlement, currently it seems the standard rebates in the system will apply rebate scales only once the Final settlement is carried out ?
Please suggest.
Thanks

Hi Mahendra,
This is a system limitation. Standard rebates cannot consider the scales during partial settlement. Partial settlement amounts are intended to be entered manually. Only during the final settlement can the system calculate the settlement amount based on the scales defined in the agreement. The system will only be able to apply the scales on rebates only once when the final volume is known and this will happen only when the Final settlement is carried out.
Regards,
Chetan Bagga

Wrong process run partial settlement line item wise in KOB5

Hi All,
I run the one process partial settlement line item wise in KOB5, But its run wrongly, Please give me suggestion for reveres the settlement for wrongly process it is possible OR not It very important issue.
Regards,
Seema

Hi Seema,
KOB5 is just for distribution of line items, I assume you have done KOB5 as well as KO88.
if you want to do a reversal of KO88 then just click on settlement option on menu bar in KO88 transaction. it will take you to reverse that settlement.
Regards,
Sayujya

Automatic partial settlement of rebates.

Hello,
For automatic partial settlement, we have to run VB(7. My questions are :-
1) Iif we need to give our own amount to be partially settled , then how to do it in this T code. I cannot see any amount column in VB(7
2) How can we partially settle a fixed amount (let's say 500 dollars) every month though VB(7
regds

Hi,
I am also having the same issue. So can you kindly share the answer for the same thread posted by you.
Best Regards
Ankur

Settlement Status-05 (Dist. rule group specfied for partial settlement)

Hi all,
If we execute the report CJID, we see the settlement status 05(Dist. rule group specfied for partial settlement).
My query is what does settlement status 05 exactly means.
Regards,
Gagandeep Singh

HI gagandeep singh,
settlement status 05 could be your allocation structure.
or else can you explain more abt your query
vengaiah chowdary

SAP QM Issues regarding follow-up action after Usage Decision

Dear Gurus -
Kindly need your expertise to resolve these issues regarding follow-up action.
1. After taking the UD i need to trigger the follow-up action to send an email with the long text to a group of people. As per standard SAP the email goes to the person taking the UD. Kindly can some one explain what & where do i need to make the changes. Also please let me know what is the customized Email ID table where mail ID's will be stored which fuction module can extract.
2. Can i also use the same functionality for partial lots during inprocess inspection. I need to send an email to a group in case the valuation is rejected for that operation.
Any response is highly appreciated.
Thank You.
Edited by: sunil t on Jan 6, 2010 7:03 PM

Hi
Please go through my recent thread
Incomming Inspection Auto mail if Rejected
Regards
Sujit

Authorization issue while executing a Web Template in SAP BI

Hello All,
I am facing an issue while executing a webtemplate .
I have a webtemplate which is being executed by end user, upon execution user must be able to fill in the value for data and submit. The query uses a characteristic KPI identifier ,SBU,BU,product, Region,Affiliate etc . All the mentioned charcaterisitics in Analysis authorization have * value except KPI identifier and SBU. And Activity 02,03 is provided for the infoprovider.
When a single value (Ex:KPI01) is provided in KPI identifier the webtemplate works fine in change mode. But when additonal value (Ex KPI02) is being added to the characterstic KPI identifier the webtemplate opens only in display mode. There is no authorization failure as well in the RSEC trace.
Actually we created two separate roles for each KPI identifier earlier but when two roles provided to a user in combination it was behaving the way i mentioned above. So we tried to create a single role with two values of KPI Identifier in single analysis authorization and it is still the same.
Please suggest what might be the reason for this behavior. Thank you
Regards,
Mohammed Ghouse

Hi Brian,
Thanks for your reply
RSECADMIN does not show any missing authorizations when checked , but what is observed is that the check happens only on display
These are the characteristics being checked by the query
Characteristic      Content in SQL format
OTCACTVT         GRI_IC005 IN ('KPI054','KPI055')
GRI_IC005          AND GRI_IC007 = 'MFE'
                            AND 0TCAACTVT = '02'
GRI_IC007
Comparison with Following Authorized Set
Characteristic      Content in SQL format
0TCAACTVT      I CP *
GRI_IC005        I EQ KPI054
                           I EQ KPI055
GRI_IC007          I EQ MFE
And it says its authorized. But still the screen is in display mode. What might be the reason for this behavior.

Issue regarding job SAP_CCMS_MONI_BATCH_STARTUP_DP

Hi,
We are facing an issue regarding an event triggered job SAP_CCMS_MONI_BATCH_STARTUP_DP.
Details of the job
ABAP Program -> RSAL_BATCH_TOOL_STARTUPDISP
User -> DDIC
Job Frequency -> Event Periodic
Event -> SAP_MONITORING_STARTUP_DISPATCH
We performed Database Refresh and this job has come from Source System. We have deleted the job in Target System but after that also we are getting continuous error message in SM21.
Error message is as follows:
14:33:36 DIA 001 000 SAPSYS EA S Failed to reschedule a periodic job
14:33:36 DIA 001 000 SAPSYS EB C > Job SAP_CCMS_MONI_BATCH_STARTUP_DP
On digging down we got the below information in SM21 regarding the error:
Documentation for system log message EA S :
This message is output by one of the job schedulers active in the
system (e.g. time or event-based scheduler). It indicates a problem
related to the database. An attempt was made to reschedule a periodic
job and write the respective control data in the database. This error
occurred for one of the associated database operations (for example,
INSERT or UPDATE).
Another cause of the error is failure to generate a new job ID number.
A subsequent message will point this out.
The following courses of action are possible:
Check whether there are any other notes on this problem next to this
message in the system log, for example direct messages from the
database interface. These details generally bring you closer to the
actual cause of the problem.
The additional information for this message contains the name of the
database table for which the error occurred.
If you determine that the error occurred during the SELECT access to
table TBTCI, the internal report belonging to this background job has
been deleted. In this case, there is normally a background job in the
'terminated' status, which ended due to runtime error
'LOAD_PROGRAM_NOT_FOUND'. Delete this job to prevent further
unnecessary scheduling on the part of the background processing
scheduler. You must then reschedule the job concerned.
As rescheduling of the periodic job could not be completed
successfully, this job is not executed at first. The background
processing scheduler takes this job and attempts to schedule it again.
Depending on the repetition period, gaps in running the background jobs
can occur for successful scheduling (i.e. the background jobs that were
unsuccessfully scheduled will be missing in the job overview if their
execution date elapsed in the meantime).
Since the next start of the periodic job could not be scheduled
correctly, there is no entry in the job overview for the planned start
date.
If the system failed to generate the job ID number, you will find notes
on what to do next in the long text of the respective system log
message.
We have fixed also Background Object in SM61.
Kindly help to fix this issue. Looking forward for reply.
Thanks,
Soumya

I am also facing similar issue . I found below SM21 entries daily . becoz of this my system performance becomes slows down. no idea which tables are getting filled up due to this .
> Job SAP_CCMS_MONI_BATCH_STARTUP_DP
Failed to reschedule a periodic job
For temporary fix we have changed the below memory parameters when system performance is poor .
EM/TOTAL_SIZE_MB = 16384
ES/SHM_SEGS_VERSION = 2
ES/TABLE = SHM_SEGS
But we need to fix these system log entries as still we are getting these errors. If anybody knows the permanent fix of this error that will be great for us.
Regards
Krishna

Issue Regarding Transfer Rules

Hi All,
We have an issue regarding Transfer Rules. We are loading Data using 0FI_GL_4 into ZFIGL_A01. It is a periodic load of data.
Last month due to some issue in R/3 we have to replicate the Data Sources and retransport the Transfer Rules from BW Dev to BW Production. Next we loaded data into the InfoCube. Now when we execute the report for the current period I am not getting Master Data Values. All are coming as Not Assigned.
We have tracked down the issue and found that the issue may be incorrect mapping of Tranfer Rules. Is there any way in Prd where we can revert back to old version of Transfer Rules or can find the old mappings in Transfer Rules.
Regards
Jay

Hi Jay,
The only way you can find your old transfer rules mapping is to goto RSA1 -
> Infosource -> Tools -> Program and compare the versions .
Bye
Dinesh

Change of Source Structure for Partial Settled WBS elements - CJ02

Hi
As per standard SAP, the change of source structure under settlement perameters of WBS element is not supported when the settlement of WBS element is done either partial / full.
However, the client needs this change by doing any Z-Development as one time activity (since the source structure was changed for certain WBS elements as per change in business process).
Can i Know procedure to do the Z development to modify the source structure for partial settled WBS elements and also let me know the any side effects in this regard.
Regards
Anil

Hi Anil,
I agree with Ajay. You can try to change it in Debugging mode.
The values are handed over from include LCJWBF5Q (form project_settle_single using)
Some customer have also made a modification as a permanent solution.
Unfortunately in the standard it is not possible.
regards Bernhard

Rebates - Partial Settlement

Hi, I need to partially settle an agreement but when i select create the credit memo, it creates a message. Message reads: The plant is missing for transaction xxxxx. I've checked the customers on the rebate condition as well as the materials and they all have plants linked. What else can I check?

Kindly refer SAP Note 728167 - Missing Plant in the enhanced rebate settlement
As per note, this can because of error can occur if you use common distribution channels for customer and material master data. The note recommends you to implement the attached source code corrections.
Hope it can assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Assign Budget is Doubled after Partial settlement reversal

Dear Experts,
When i m creating Cj88 Partial settlement of Rs.100/- & revesrsed it because of wrong Asset Value date.
Again i done CJ88 for Rs.100/- with new Asset value date.
But after reversal of settlemet & again settlement, my assign budget amount getting doubled of settlement amount i.e. Rs.(100+100=200) i, that its blocking budget for of Rs.100/- extra.
Its booking doubled budget as same amount of settlement amount.
Please suggest, its happen in production & not allowing to create PO for balance budget.
Please help.
Thanks & Regards,
Amey

Hi,
Thanks for your reply,
I checked than availability control anaylsis,
I found this entries,
COSP 2011 22 0059000001 RMBE D INR                        24,517,023.30 INR
COSP 2011 21 0059000002 RMBA D INR                                 0.00 INR
COSP 2011 11 0020030001     0001322611 COIN D INR          ___41,282,596.54 INR___
COSP 2011 11 0020030001     0001322611 COIN C INR          20,641,298.27- INR
COSP 2011 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN D INR          10,784,468.10 INR
COSP 2011 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN C INR             245,626.18- INR
COSP 2011 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN O INR          10,538,841.92- INR   S
COSP 2010 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN D INR          10,102,456.35 INR
COSP 2010 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN O INR          10,102,456.35- INR   S
In this entries Rs.41282596.54, is showing problem, Addition of Actual 41282596.54 + Commitmnet Rs.24517023 = Total Amount 65,799,619.84.
In actual amount should be Rs.20641298.27 instead of Rs.41282596.54 then it will show,
But when run same cyscle its showing propely in Develeopement & Quality, its showing same amount but Rs.412/82596.54 is not added in actual amount.
It should show addittion of 2451023.300+20641298.27 = 45158321.54
My actual amount should be 4518321.54.
Please suggest, why this amount is added in actual amount or assign amount.
thanks & reply,
arvind

Issue regarding executing manual partial settlement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for