Issue regarding update rules--Table RSUPDKEY

Hi Friends..
Can anyone please tell me something about the table RSUPDKEY?
I knw the use of this table.......but how the fields are getting updated.......how the value in the filed BOOLEAN getting populated?
I am facing a strange problem...
In Production system.....For one keyfigure....one characteristic is not mapped...initial value option is selected.But in the field Source Characteristic that charecteristic name is selected but that option is not selected.......it means the field is not blank......
For Prod......in the table RSUPDKEY.........for this rule......in the Source Infoobject field that infoobject name is coming and Boolean field = X
When I am trying to do the same thing in the development box............i.e. in the Source Characteristic field I have selected the infoobject and i have selected the Initial value option............after that when I am saving it.......the Source characteristic field remains blank......
In Dev box in this table both the fields are blank.
Thanks and Regards,
Debjani.....

Hi,
You can check End Routine .
An end routine is a routine with a table in the target structure format as input and output parameters. You can use an end routine to postprocess data after transformation on a package-by-package basis
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/43/bcdc6001344defe10000000a422035/content.htm.
Below is the lSAP help link for migration of 3.x update rules & transfer rules.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/43/f00e2696d24c5fe10000000a155369/frameset.htm
Hope this helps!
Edited by: Meera Murali on Mar 4, 2009 9:52 AM

Similar Messages

Issue with Update of Table VARINUM

Hi,
I am getting waiting Issues with Update of table VARINUM. Has anybody faced such an issue.
I have a lot of Jobs which are running in background. I am submitting it through a report. what can be the issue.
Regards,
Abhishek jolly

Thisi is quite old, but not answered properly yet, so there you go:
SAP generates a new job and temporary variant on report RSDBSPJS, for each HTTP call,which creates database locks on table VARINUM .
This causes any heavyweight BSP application to hang and give timeout errors.
The problem is fixed applying OSS note 1791958, which is not included in any service pack.

Issue Regarding Transfer Rules

Hi All,
We have an issue regarding Transfer Rules. We are loading Data using 0FI_GL_4 into ZFIGL_A01. It is a periodic load of data.
Last month due to some issue in R/3 we have to replicate the Data Sources and retransport the Transfer Rules from BW Dev to BW Production. Next we loaded data into the InfoCube. Now when we execute the report for the current period I am not getting Master Data Values. All are coming as Not Assigned.
We have tracked down the issue and found that the issue may be incorrect mapping of Tranfer Rules. Is there any way in Prd where we can revert back to old version of Transfer Rules or can find the old mappings in Transfer Rules.
Regards
Jay

Hi Jay,
The only way you can find your old transfer rules mapping is to goto RSA1 -
> Infosource -> Tools -> Program and compare the versions .
Bye
Dinesh

Facing some issue regarding Requisition interface table

I am facing some issue regarding Requisition interface table..
Purpose: we have to massage data & create massage data & create Requisitions.
Issue Detail:
Before:
Previously it was Auto Create Purchase Requisition
On the move transaction form step 10 to 20, this step will trigger creation of requisition.
and Creating Requisition successfully.
After:
After stopping Auto Create Purchase Requisition functionality the Requisition interface data is not getting populated in the Requisition Interface tables as well.
Please provide your inputs.

It's standard functionality not to populate the req interface while you don't want to autocreate.
Thanks,
PS.

Issues with update rule

Hi All,
I am having a problem with update rule
My object
A
B
C
D(Seller phase) (complex table)
Q1(Question)
A1(Answer) (complex table)
Q2(Question)
A2(Answer) (complex table)
Q3(Question)
A3(Answer) (complex table)
E(Collection object)
D(seller Phase)
Q(Question)
A(Answer)
My transaction during Add
A
B
C
D(Seller phase)(complex table)
Q1(Question)
A1(Answer)(complex table)
Q2(Question)
A2(Answer)(complex table)
Q3(Question)
A3(Answer)(complex table)
E(Collection object)
D(seller Phase)
Q(Question)
A(Answer)
here is my requirement:
During Activity create/Edit upon choosing seller phase i bring questions based on update rules of q1 q2 and q3 from complex table.
Possible answers are also fetched from complex table based on selection of phase for each question. I have a update rules for answers to check the object collection(E) and determine if this phase exist or not, If exist previously selected Answers will bulled from collection for the corresponding question if not it has to empty.
All rule are working with out any problem.
Issue.
During create or edit if some one chooses phase P1 and answers for the questions and with out saving if they change phase then answers which are been selected earlier still exist.
This is happening in IPAD but not in ATE. I have checked the log for rules all the rules are returning values as expected.
So i tried the below options to test
1) with special value option in field level
2) I created a dummy field with update rule with value test. On creation i have modified the dummy field value X then changed the phase the value is not getting updated as per update rule.
Is it the real behavior of update rule? Is there any work around for this problem
Regards,
Gupta

Gupta,
So based on your comments above I have the workarounds I gave you.
1) A button that refreshes "resets" to make the screen repaint (in essence a button that just re-navigates to the same screen will make all the system reset) if you just want one screen.
2)Or the multiple screen approach. Let phase 1 be in one screen and the other questions and answers on others.
Not sure if you can just do 1 screen with multi-tiles - If this is better approach where the phase selection is on 1 tile (top tile) and the questions and answers are on a different tile (bottom tile).
The trick is to make the screen repaint. As long as you present to the customers a flawless flow you will be okay. The one that you don't want to happen is when your rules are buggy then it may be just a good idea to sell a more controlled flow that works than debugging what went down the wrong during UAT (User Acceptance Test).
Regards,
Mark

Issue with Update Rules

Hi,
 I am working on IM (Inventory Management), following the steps as in " How to Handle Inventory management Scenario In BW ". I installed all objects from Business Content that are required for IM like Infocube(0IC_C03) and three communication structures related to datasources 03_BX, 03_BF, 03_UM.
 I initailised the material stock using 2lis_03_BX and I compressed the request without marker update(uncheck the check box). I can see the data in infocube.
 When I am trying to load the material movements 2Lis_03_BF, my data is comming into Infocube, In the manage I can see 0 records are added.
 When I check the monitor and details, here I can see upto transfer rules data is coming but in update rules I cant see any data.
 I checked the routines in update rules they are satisfying the condition.
 Any help would be highly appreciated and rewarded.
Regds
Dave.

Thank you all for your replies:
Narendra - I will continue to debug start routine and update routines.
Teja - Not all records have stock category 'V' or stock type 'V'. The start routine filters out some records, but the majority of the records are passing through the start routine. In the monitor 'Details' tab the message is Number of records changed from X to (X - Y), and then 0 records added to fact table.
Nagesh - yes, all records have a process key assigned.
Thanks in advance for any additional comments,
Mark

Issue with updating partitioned table

Hi,
Anyone seen this bug with updating partitioned tables.
Its very esoteric - its occurs when we update a partitioned table using a join to a temp table (not non-temp table) when the join has multiple joins and you're updating the partitoned column that isn't the first column in the primary key and the table contains a bit field. We've tried changing just one of these features and the bug disappears.
We've tested this on 15.5 and 15.7 SP122 and the error occurs in both of them.
Here's the test case - it does the same operation of a partitioned table and a non-partitioned table, but the partitioned table shows and error of "Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object 'partitioned' with unique index 'pk'".
I'd be interested if anyone has seen this and has a version of Sybase without the issue.
Unfortunately when it happens on a replicated table - it takes down rep server.
CREATE TABLE #table1
 ( PK char(8) null,
 FileDate date,
 changed bit
CREATE TABLE partitioned (
PK char(8) NOT NULL,
ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL
LOCK DATAROWS
PARTITION BY RANGE (ValidTo)
( p2014 VALUES <= ('20141231') ON [default],
p2015 VALUES <= ('20151231') ON [default],
pMAX VALUES <= (MAX) ON [default]
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
ON partitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
LOCAL INDEX
CREATE TABLE unpartitioned (
PK char(8) NOT NULL,
ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL,
LOCK DATAROWS
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
ON unpartitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
insert partitioned
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
insert unpartitioned
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
insert #table1
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
union all
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
go
update partitioned
set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
from #table1 t
inner join partitioned p on (p.PK = t.PK)
where p.ValidTo = '99991231'
and t.changed = 1
go
update unpartitioned
set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
from #table1 t
inner join unpartitioned u on (u.PK = t.PK)
where u.ValidTo = '99991231'
and t.changed = 1
go
drop table #table1
go
drop table partitioned
drop table unpartitioned
go

wrt to replication - it is a bit unclear as not enough information has been stated to point out what happened. I also am not sure that your DBA's are accurately telling you what happened - and may have made the problem worse by not knowing themselves what to do - e.g. 'losing' the log points to fact that someone doesn't know what they should. You can *always* disable the replication secondary truncation point and resync a standby system, so claims about 'losing' the log are a bit strange to be making.
wrt to ASE versions, I suspect if there are any differences, it may have to do with endian-ness and not the version of ASE itself. There may be other factors.....but I would suggest the best thing would be to open a separate message/case on it.
Adaptive Server Enterprise/15.7/EBF 23010 SMP SP130 /P/X64/Windows Server/ase157sp13x/3819/64-bit/OPT/Fri Aug 22 22:28:21 2014:
-- testing with tinyint
1> use demo_db
1>
2> CREATE TABLE #table1
3> ( PK char(8) null,
4> FileDate date,
5> -- changed bit
6> changed tinyint
7> )
8>
9> CREATE TABLE partitioned (
10> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
11> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
12> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL
13> )
14>
15> LOCK DATAROWS
16> PARTITION BY RANGE (ValidTo)
17> ( p2014 VALUES <= ('20141231') ON [default],
18> p2015 VALUES <= ('20151231') ON [default],
19> pMAX VALUES <= (MAX) ON [default]
20> )
21>
22> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
23> ON partitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
24> LOCAL INDEX
25>
26> CREATE TABLE unpartitioned (
27> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
28> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
29> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL,
30> )
31> LOCK DATAROWS
32>
33> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
34> ON unpartitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
35>
36> insert partitioned
37> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
38>
39> insert unpartitioned
40> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
41>
42> insert #table1
43> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
44> union all
45> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
(1 row affected)
(1 row affected)
(2 rows affected)
1>
2> update partitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join partitioned p on (p.PK = t.PK)
6> where p.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
Msg 2601, Level 14, State 6:
Server 'PHILLY_ASE', Line 2:
Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object 'partitioned' with unique index 'pk'
Command has been aborted.
(0 rows affected)
1>
2> update unpartitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join unpartitioned u on (u.PK = t.PK)
6> where u.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
(1 row affected)
1>
2> drop table #table1
1>
2> drop table partitioned
3> drop table unpartitioned
-- duplicating with 'int'
1> use demo_db
1>
2> CREATE TABLE #table1
3> ( PK char(8) null,
4> FileDate date,
5> -- changed bit
6> changed int
7> )
8>
9> CREATE TABLE partitioned (
10> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
11> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
12> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL
13> )
14>
15> LOCK DATAROWS
16> PARTITION BY RANGE (ValidTo)
17> ( p2014 VALUES <= ('20141231') ON [default],
18> p2015 VALUES <= ('20151231') ON [default],
19> pMAX VALUES <= (MAX) ON [default]
20> )
21>
22> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
23> ON partitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
24> LOCAL INDEX
25>
26> CREATE TABLE unpartitioned (
27> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
28> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
29> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL,
30> )
31> LOCK DATAROWS
32>
33> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
34> ON unpartitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
35>
36> insert partitioned
37> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
38>
39> insert unpartitioned
40> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
41>
42> insert #table1
43> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
44> union all
45> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
(1 row affected)
(1 row affected)
(2 rows affected)
1>
2> update partitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join partitioned p on (p.PK = t.PK)
6> where p.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
Msg 2601, Level 14, State 6:
Server 'PHILLY_ASE', Line 2:
Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object 'partitioned' with unique index 'pk'
Command has been aborted.
(0 rows affected)
1>
2> update unpartitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join unpartitioned u on (u.PK = t.PK)
6> where u.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
(1 row affected)
1>
2> drop table #table1
1>
2> drop table partitioned
3> drop table unpartitioned

Regarding update rules activation in inventory management(2LIS_03_BF)

Hellow gurus,
i am working on inventory management with snap shot scenario for that we are using 3 business content datasources they are (2LIS_03_BX, 2LIS_03_BF, 2LIS_03_UM), now i want to activate the update rules for infosource(2LIS_03_BF) & cube, when i check the update rules it shows every thing is ok, but not activating ,please could you give me the suggestions
Regards,
Chandra.

bf setuptable filling based on posting date
give the posting date and give the name of job run
give the termination date and time
execute in background.you you can start the more jobs
depending on your data.you have bulk data you can divide the
jobs in based on posting date.
after that check the status in sm37.

Issue while Updating a table having Unique Secondary Index

Hi,
I am trying to update a 'Z' table in which there are 5 fields comprising of primary key. Out of them 2 key fields are defined as a part of seconadry index with 'Unique' option selected.
As per the requirement, I am trying to update the table using modify statement so whenever this statement occurs it will check the primary keys and accordingly try to m

958572 wrote:
Hi,
We have observed the exception *'JDBC activity timed out while updating the table -Table1"* in our logs in prod environment.
1)we verified the AWR report for that particular time and observed that one update statement was trying to update the table table1.
its a simple update statement as below
UPADTE TABLE1 SET COL1=VAL1,COL2=VAL2 WHERE ID1=VAL1 AND ID2=VAL2;
there is a PK index on ID2 column.
2)we also came to know that there were no locks on TABLE1 during this time.
can some one please let me know what could be the possible reason for this kind of exception?
ThanksOS/Networking mis-configuration.
Oracle does not know or care about the type or flavor of remote client (JDBC, OCI, ODBC, etc).
Oracle's default configuration contains no timeout.
I suspect a FireWall setting.

Trigger Issue while updating same table

Hi all,
I am creating one after insert trigger on table tests, which will check, if application id is null, application will be fetched from another table and update the table
tests table. But this trigger is not updating the application id of the table tests
CREATE OR REPLACE
TRIGGER TB_REC_APPL_TESTS1
AFTER INSERT ON tests FOR EACH ROW
DECLARE
v_application_id NUMBER;
v_rec_appl_tests_id NUMBER;
v_a_recruit_id NUMBER;
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
v_rec_appl_tests_id := :NEW.rec_appl_tests_id;
v_a_recruit_id := :NEW.a_recruit_id;
IF :NEW.a_applic_id IS NULL THEN
SELECT a_applic_id INTO v_application_id FROM recruit WHERE a_recrut_id = v_a_recruit_id;
dbms_output.PUT_LINE(v_application_id||'-'||v_rec_appl_tests_id);
UPDATE tests SET a_applic_id = v_application_id
WHERE rec_appl_tests_id = v_rec_appl_tests_id;--:NEW.rec_appl_tests_id;
END IF;
commit;
END;
Thanks in advance,
Pal

user546710 wrote:
Hi all,
I am creating one after insert trigger on table tests, which will check, if application id is null, application will be fetched from another table and update the table
tests table. But this trigger is not updating the application id of the table tests
CREATE OR REPLACE
TRIGGER TB_REC_APPL_TESTS1
AFTER INSERT ON tests FOR EACH ROW
DECLARE
v_application_id NUMBER;
v_rec_appl_tests_id NUMBER;
v_a_recruit_id NUMBER;
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
v_rec_appl_tests_id := :NEW.rec_appl_tests_id;
v_a_recruit_id := :NEW.a_recruit_id;
IF :NEW.a_applic_id IS NULL THEN
SELECT a_applic_id INTO v_application_id FROM recruit WHERE a_recrut_id = v_a_recruit_id;
dbms_output.PUT_LINE(v_application_id||'-'||v_rec_appl_tests_id);
UPDATE tests SET a_applic_id = v_application_id
WHERE rec_appl_tests_id = v_rec_appl_tests_id;--:NEW.rec_appl_tests_id;
END IF;
commit;
END;
Thanks in advance,
Palyou are creating triger on the table and updating it. It will not allow to update since you are firing trigger on same table.
Best practice is to use other table to update or any other operation.

Performance issue and functional question regarding updates on tables

A person at my site wrote some code to update a custom field on the MARC table that was being copied from the MARA table. Here is what I would have expected to see as the code. Assume that both sets of code have a parameter called p_werks which is the plant in question.
data : commit_count type i.
select matnr zfield from mara into (wa_marc-matnr, wa_marc-zfield).
update marc set zfield = wa_marc-zfield
 where werks = p_werks and matnr = wa_matnr.
commit work and wait.
endselect.
I would have committed every 200 rows instead of every one row, but here's the actual code and my question isn't around the commits but something else. In this case an internal table was built with two elements - MATNR and WERKS - could have done that above too, but that's not my question.
 DO.
 " Lock the record that needs to be update with material creation date
 CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUEUE_EMMARCS'
 EXPORTING
 mode_marc = 'S'
 mandt = sy-mandt
 matnr = wa_marc-matnr
 werks = wa_marc-werks
 EXCEPTIONS
 foreign_lock = 1
 system_failure = 2
 OTHERS = 3.
 IF sy-subrc <> 0.
 " Wait, if the records not able to perform as lock
 CALL FUNCTION 'RZL_SLEEP'.
 ELSE.
 EXIT.
 ENDIF.
 ENDDO.
 " Update the record in the table MARC with material creation date
 UPDATE marc SET zzdate = wa_mara-zzdate
 WHERE matnr = wa_mara-matnr AND
 werks = wa_marc-werks. " IN s_werks.
 IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
 " Save record in the database table MARC
 CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
 EXPORTING
 wait = 'X'
 IMPORTING
 return = wa_return.
 wa_log-matnr = wa_marc-matnr.
 wa_log-werks = wa_marc-werks.
 wa_log-type = 'S'.
 " text-010 - 'Material creation date has updated'.
 wa_log-message = text-010.
 wa_log-zzdate = wa_mara-zzdate.
 APPEND wa_log TO tb_log.
 CLEAR: wa_return,wa_log.
 ELSE.
 " Roll back the record(un save), if there is any issue occurs
 CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_ROLLBACK'
 IMPORTING
 return = wa_return.
 wa_log-matnr = wa_marc-matnr.
 wa_log-werks = wa_marc-werks.
 wa_log-type = 'E'.
 " 'Material creation date does not updated'.
 wa_log-message = text-011.
 wa_log-zzdate = wa_mara-zzdate..
 APPEND wa_log TO tb_log.
 CLEAR: wa_return, wa_log.
 ENDIF.
 " Unlock the record from data base
 CALL FUNCTION 'DEQUEUE_EMMARCS'
 EXPORTING
 mode_marc = 'S'
 mandt = sy-mandt
 matnr = wa_marc-matnr
 werks = wa_marc-werks.
 ENDIF.
Here's the question - why did this person enqueue and dequeue explicit locks like this ? They claimed it was to prevent issues - what issues ??? Is there something special about updating tables that we don't know about ? We've actually seen it where the system runs out of these ENQUEUE locks.
Before you all go off the deep end and ask why not just do the update, keep in mind that you don't want to update a million + rows and then do a commit either - that locks up the entire table!

The ENQUEUE lock insure that another program called by another user will not update the data at the same time, so preventing database coherence to be lost. In fact, another user on a SAP correct transaction, has read the record and locked it, so when it will be updated your modifications will be lost, also you could override modifications made by another user in another luw.
You cannot use a COMMIT WORK in a SELECT - ENDSELECT, because COMMIT WORK will close each and every opened database cursor, so your first idea would dump after the first update. (so the internal table is mandatory)
Go through some documentation like [Updates in the R/3 System (BC-CST-UP)|http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCCSTUP/BCCSTUP_PT.pdf]
Regards

One issue regarding update open Qty. of PO in PP/DS after goods receipt through interface.

Dear experts:
We are implementing APO-PP/DS integrated with Non-SAP ERP system, as the standard CIF can’t be used between ERP and APO, we have to use BAPI to transfer data.
Now we are facing a problem, after final confirmation & goods receipt of production order in ERP, the open quantity of production order should be updated in PP/DS, but we can’t find any BAPI can help on this.
We’ve tried BAPI_MOSRVAPS_CONFHEADMULTI and BAPI_MOSRVAPS_CONFOPRMULTI for production order confirmation, but failed, as SAP said, confirmation without goods receipt will not update the order open quantity. We also tried BAPI_MOSRVAPS_SAVEMULTI3 to change the receipt quantity, but failed, as after partial confirmation, the quantity of production order can’t be changed, but we can’t find a field of “open quantity” (open quantity = total quantity – delivery quantity) in the BAPI. So how can we update the open quantity of production order in PP/DS after goods receipt from ERP?
Appreciate for your input, thanks.
Regards
Kevin

Dear Uli
Thanks for your information, we tried it again according to your
instruction via Function module /SAPAPO/CIF_ORDER_INBOUND, but failed.
For import parameters:
OBJECTTYPE = 6
LOGSYS = “Our logical system”
The screenshot is as following:
In the IT_OUT table:
ORDNR = “Production order number in our ERP system”
ORDERGUID = “Internal order number of this production order in
APO” (we also tried to keep this field blank)
METHOD = C
GR_QUANTITY = 2
The screenshot is as following:
The ET_RETURN has no response
And nothing gets update in product view.
Is there anything wrong in my parameters?
Thanks & Regards
Kevin
Best Regards

Issue with updation of table BBP_PDBEI

Hello,
I am facing a strange issue. I created an extended classic PO. It is properly replicated in the backend. But the table BBP_PDBEI is not getting filled. The only details I found in BBP_PD were BE_OBJECT_TYPE as BUS2201 and BE_OBJECT_ID as 1. BBP_GET_STATUS_2 seems to work fine.
If I execute function module BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC using the GUID of PO which is already transferred to backend, then the table BBP_PDBEI is updated properly.
Therefore, everytime I need to update the PO using FM BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC. Ideally, it should happen automatically.
Any suggesstions?
Thanks,
Arun Singh

Hi,
It appears to be more a BBP_GET_STATUS program issue.
You can do 2 things:
1) Execute Report BBP_GET_STATUS_2 manually & then check BBP_PD for the particular PO.
2) You may also look for spools (Log) for the GET STATUS job in tcode SM37. Look for any errors listed.
Cheers,
Akash

Issues regarding update and ovi mail

hello there,i am using c6 00 for about 9 months .everything is fine as of nw.but recently due to a faulty app i have reset the phone to its factory defaults.and after that the problem started.fyi its symbian 5th and it has all the latest updates till date.prior to the reset.the ovi mail feature was wrkng fine.as u kne its under e mail -new a/c -select the servise provider like gmail,hotmail etc.so sftr the reset i tried to set up email a/c.evry other service provider is showing a small widget whn i click on them...such as gmail-id-pass-accept the terms-setting up mailbox-finisn.but whn i try to enter my ovi mail credentials its not showing the widget...instead of that it opens and redirects to ovi webpage.the widget for ovimail has vanished and even after if i try to enter my credentials on that ovi webpage,it will confirm the mailbox and says next.upon hitting next it says configuring ur mailbox and all of a sudden the internet connection disconnects by itself for 5-6 secs and comes up again.and by that time it says failed to configure the mailbox.try again later.i dnt knw why this is happening coz i dnt face any prblms with other mail a/c setup.only whn i try to configure ovi mail it redirects to a webpage instead of widget.need help coz all my imp mails are there.and fyi have checked frm diff source that is there any prblms with the ovi a/c.everythng is fyn apart frm this configuration issue.checked for any recent updates regarding ovi.but evrythngs fine.help me pls. thanks in advance..and also i have 1 query about symbian anna.can i upgrade sym 5th to anna?and how?

Try a Nokia Care Center to get an update.
If you find my post helpful please click the green star on the left under the avatar. Thanks.

Strange issue in updating custom table after upgrade ECC6.0! Please help!

Hello everyone:
 I have some code (shown below) that deletes and updates some SAP tables and one custom table:
 DELETE T5UBV FROM TABLE DEL_T5UBV.
DELETE ZCHRZIP FROM TABLE DEL_ZCHRZIP.
MODIFY ZCHRZIP FROM TABLE WRITE_ZCHRZIP.
MODIFY T5UBV FROM TABLE WRITE_T5UBV.
COMMIT WORK.
For SAP table the code above works fine but for custom table it overrides all exisiting data! It should keep some existing data in custom table ZCHRZIP and append any extra data from internal table WRITE_ZCHRZIP. This functions as designed if I run in fore ground but in background it just overrides instead of modifying and appending! This is happening only after upgrade ECC6.0. Any thoughts? Please let me know.
Thanks.
Mithun

Mithun,
Comment below code
DELETE ZCHRZIP FROM TABLE DEL_ZCHRZIP.
Reward if it helps,
Satish

Issue regarding update rules--Table RSUPDKEY

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for