Issue when suming the field in Select query using inner join

Hi All,
SELECT A~OI_SHNUM
       A~FORWAGENT
       A~ROUTE
       A~SHTYP
       A~DTSHP_EACT
       A~/BIC/GTCLICENS
       A~/BIC/GTCADD04
       A~COMP_CODE
       SUM( C~GRS_WGT_DL )
       C~UNIT_OF_WT
INTO TABLE I_LAYONE
FROM ( ( /BIC/ANTCD000200 AS A
INNER JOIN /BIC/AGSSD000700 AS B ON BOI_SHNUM = AOI_SHNUM )
INNER JOIN /BIC/AGSSD000600 AS C ON CDELIV_NUMB = BDELIV_NUMB ).
I need to sum the field C~GRS_WGT_DL
While compiling it show the error given below
The field "C~UNIT_OF_WT" from the SELECT list is is missing in the
GROUP BY clause. is missing in the GROUP BY clause. is missing in the
GROUP BY clause. is missing in the GROUP BY clause. is missing in the
GROUP BY clause. is "C~UNIT_OF_W
with regards,
Thambe

Hi,
Try the following SQL statement. Hope it helps you.
SELECT A~OI_SHNUM
A~FORWAGENT
A~ROUTE
A~SHTYP
A~DTSHP_EACT
A~/BIC/GTCLICENS
A~/BIC/GTCADD04
A~COMP_CODE
SUM( C~GRS_WGT_DL )
C~UNIT_OF_WT
INTO TABLE I_LAYONE
FROM ( ( /BIC/ANTCD000200 AS A
INNER JOIN /BIC/AGSSD000700 AS B ON BOI_SHNUM = AOI_SHNUM )
INNER JOIN /BIC/AGSSD000600 AS C ON CDELIV_NUMB = BDELIV_NUMB )
GROUP BY
A~OI_SHNUM
A~FORWAGENT
A~ROUTE
A~SHTYP
A~DTSHP_EACT
A~/BIC/GTCLICENS
A~/BIC/GTCADD04
A~COMP_CODE.
Murthy.

Similar Messages

Select querry using inner join

Hi Friends,
I need to fetch data from two tables, I used inner join but I am not able to fetch the data in some fields can any one tell me what is wrong in this select querry.
SELECT but000~partner
         but000~name_org1
         but000~name_first
         but000~name_last
         but000~bpext
      FROM but000 INNER JOIN dfkkop ON but000partner = dfkkopgpart
    INTO table lt_but000
    WHERE but000~partner IN so_part
    AND dfkkop~faedn IN so_faedn.
Thanx in advance,
Parvez

hi Lutin,
SELECT but000~partner
but000~name_org1
but000~name_first
but000~name_last
but000~bpext
FROM but000 INNER JOIN dfkkop ON but000partner = dfkkopgpart <------check this condition,it has to *satisfy both table
INTO table lt_but000
WHERE but000~partner IN so_part
AND dfkkop~faedn IN so_faedn.
Regards,
siva
Message was edited by:
        SivaKumar

Delete query using inner join

I need to delete records from a table using inner join from other tables. See below for the table structure and records.
CREATE TABLE STUDENT (ROLL_NO NUMBER(10),NAME VARCHAR2(100),DEPT_NO NUMBER(10),JOIN_DATE DATE);
CREATE TABLE DEPART (DEPT_NO NUMBER(10), DEPT_NAME VARCHAR2(100));
CREATE TABLE ACTIVE_DEPT (DEPT_NO NUMBER(10), IS_ACTIVE VARCHAR2(1));
INSERT INTO STUDENT (ROLL_NO,NAME,DEPT_NO,JOIN_DATE) VALUES(1,'SAM',10,SYSDATE-10);
INSERT INTO STUDENT (ROLL_NO,NAME,DEPT_NO,JOIN_DATE) VALUES(2,'ALEX',10,SYSDATE -10);
INSERT INTO STUDENT (ROLL_NO,NAME,DEPT_NO,JOIN_DATE) VALUES(3,'FRANK',20,SYSDATE -10);
INSERT INTO STUDENT (ROLL_NO,NAME,DEPT_NO,JOIN_DATE) VALUES(4,'WAYNE',20,SYSDATE+1);
INSERT INTO STUDENT (ROLL_NO,NAME,DEPT_NO,JOIN_DATE) VALUES(5,'KRUL',30,SYSDATE -10);
INSERT INTO STUDENT (ROLL_NO,NAME,DEPT_NO,JOIN_DATE) VALUES(6,'ALICE',40,SYSDATE -10);
INSERT INTO DEPART (DEPT_NO,DEPT_NAME) VALUES (10,'DEPT1');
INSERT INTO DEPART (DEPT_NO,DEPT_NAME) VALUES (20,'DEPT2');
INSERT INTO DEPART (DEPT_NO,DEPT_NAME) VALUES (30,'DEPT3');
INSERT INTO ACTIVE_DEPT (DEPT_NO,IS_ACTIVE) VALUES (10,'Y');
INSERT INTO ACTIVE_DEPT (DEPT_NO,IS_ACTIVE) VALUES (20,'N');
INSERT INTO ACTIVE_DEPT (DEPT_NO,IS_ACTIVE) VALUES (30,'Y');
DELETE FROM STUDENT WHERE (STUDENT.DEPT_NO) IN (SELECT D.dept_no FROM DEPART D,ACTIVE_DEPT AD WHERE D.DEPT_NO = AD.DEPT_NO AND AD.IS_ACTIVE = 'N');The above delete query will delete two records from the STUDENT table. Now i want to include another condition say, join_date should be a past date (join_date < trunc(sysdate)).
How to include this condition in the above delete statement. I know i can do this using a subquery but i wont prefer that option. Basically i don't have much idea about join in delete statements.
Please help.

Is this you need ?
DELETE FROM student WHERE join_date < TRUNC(SYSDATE)
                                        AND student.dept_no IN (SELECT D.dept_no
                                                                  FROM depart d,active_dept ad
                                                                 WHERE d.dept_no = ad.dept_no AND ad.is_active = 'N');Only one record is deleted. -> 3,'FRANK',20,SYSDATE -10
>
Balaji      wrote:
Yes. But here we are getting the dept_no from the sub query, is there a better way to achieve this without sub query?
>
As far I know you need to have sub query in this case.
You can close this thread if answered. If you have any further queries please post it so that someone can help you.
Edited by: Lokanath Giri on २० मार्च, २०१२ ५:०५ अपराह्न

Select Query with Inner Join

Dear Experts,
I have writen a inner join code with MKPF and MSEG which taking too much time, while I have used index.
Indexes are:
MSEG
MATNR
WERKS
LGORT
BWART
SOBKZ
MKPF
BUDAT
MBLNR
My Select Query is :
SELECT B~MATNR
               B~MAT_KDAUF
               B~MAT_KDPOS
               B~BWART
               B~MENGE
               B~MEINS
               B~AUFNR
    INTO TABLE IT_MSEG
    FROM MKPF AS A
      INNER JOIN MSEG AS B
         ON AMBLNR EQ BMBLNR
        AND AMJAHR EQ BMJAHR
    WHERE A~BUDAT IN BUDAT
      AND B~MATNR IN MATNR
      AND B~WERKS IN WERKS
      AND B~LGORT IN LGORT
      AND B~BWART IN BWART.

hi,
you can use for all entries it will work faster then joins
About it:*
FOR ALL ENTRIES WHERE
Syntax
... FOR ALL ENTRIES IN itab WHERE ... col operator itab-comp ...
Effect
If the addition FOR ALL ENTRIES is specified before the language element WHERE, then the components comp of the internal table itab can be used as operands when comparing with relational operators.
The internal table itab must have a structured line type and the component comp must be compatible with the column col.
The logical expression sql_cond of the WHERE condition can comprise various logical expressions by using AND and OR. However, if FOR ALL ENTRIES is specified, there must be at least one Comparison with a column of the internal table itab, which can be specified either statistically or dynamically (Release 6.40 and higher). In a statement with a SELECTstatement with FOR ALL ENTRIES, the addition ORDER BY can only be used with the addition PRIMARY KEY.
The whole logical expression sql_cond is evaluated for each individual line of the internal table itab. The resulting set of the SELECT statement is the union of the resulting sets from the individual evaluations. Duplicate lines are automatically removed from the resulting set. If the internal table itab is empty, the whole WHERE statement is ignored and all lines in the database are put in the resulting set.
Notes
In Release 6.10 and higher, the same internal table can be specified after FOR ALL ENTRIES and after INTO.
The addition FOR ALL ENTRIES is only possible before WHERE conditions of the SELECT statement.
Example
Exporting all flight data for a specified departure city. The relevant airlines and flight numbers are first put in an internal table entry_tab, which is evaluated in the WHERE condition of the subsquent SELECT statement.
PARAMETERS p_city TYPE spfli-cityfrom.
TYPES: BEGIN OF entry_tab_type,
         carrid TYPE spfli-carrid,
         connid TYPE spfli-connid,
       END OF entry_tab_type.
DATA: entry_tab   TYPE TABLE OF entry_tab_type,
      sflight_tab TYPE SORTED TABLE OF sflight
                       WITH UNIQUE KEY carrid connid fldate.
SELECT carrid connid
       FROM spfli
       INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE entry_tab
       WHERE cityfrom = p_city.
SELECT carrid connid fldate
       FROM sflight
       INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE sflight_tab
       FOR ALL ENTRIES IN entry_tab
       WHERE carrid = entry_tab-carrid AND
             connid = entry_tab-connid.
hope it will help you
Rahul sharma
Edited by: RAHUL SHARMA on Sep 11, 2008 8:10 AM

How to re-write this big SELECT Query with INNER JOINs?

Hi Experts
I have a performance killer SELECT query with an inner join of 3 tables u2013 VBAP, VBAK and VBEP together, which populates records to an internal table INT_COLL_ORD. Based on these records selected, in another SELECT query, records are fetched from VBUK table to the internal table INT_VBUK.
SELECT A~VBELN A~POSNR A~MATNR A~KWMENG A~KBMENG A~ERDAT A~ERZET A~PSTYV D~AUART E~ETTYP E~EDATU
INTO TABLE INT_TAB_RES
FROM VBAP AS A INNER JOIN VBAK AS D
ON D~VBELN EQ A~VBELN AND D~MANDT EQ A~MANDT
INNER JOIN VBEP AS E
ON E~VBELN EQ A~VBELN AND E~POSNR EQ A~POSNR AND E~MANDT EQ A~MANDT
WHERE A~VBELN IN s_VBELN AND
       D~auart in s_auart AND
       D~vkorg in s_vkorg AND
       D~vbtyp eq 'C'     AND
       ( ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_sp AND zz_msposnr NE 0 AND kbmeng EQ 0 )
       OR ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_fp AND kwmeng NE A~kbmeng ) ) AND
       A~ABGRU EQ SPACE AND
       A~MTVFP IN R_MTVFP AND
       A~PRCTR IN R_PRCT AND
       E~ETENR EQ '1'.
SORT INT_COLL_ORD BY VBELN POSNR ETTYP.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM INT_TAB_RES COMPARING VBELN POSNR.
CHECK NOT INT_TAB_RES [] IS INITIAL.
SELECT VBELN UVALL CMGST INTO TABLE INT_VBUK
FROM VBUK FOR ALL ENTRIES IN INT_TAB_RES
WHERE VBELN = INT_TAB_RES-VBELN AND UVALL NE 'A'.
Now, the requirement is:
I want to split this query. Like, first join VBAK and VBUK first. With this selection, go to the inner join of VBAP and VBEP (on key VBELN) to get the results. How can I re-write this Query?
Please help.
Thx n Rgds

Hi Nagraj
As of your suggestion, I have re-written the query as below:
* Declarations
TYPES: BEGIN OF TYP_COLL_ORD,
        VBELN LIKE VBAK-VBELN,
        POSNR LIKE VBUP-POSNR,
        MATNR LIKE VBAP-MATNR,
        KWMENG LIKE VBAP-KWMENG,
        KBMENG LIKE VBAP-KBMENG,
        ERDAT LIKE VBAK-ERDAT,
        ERZET LIKE VBAK-ERZET,
        PSTYV LIKE VBAP-PSTYV,
        AUART LIKE VBAK-AUART, u201Calready exists in type
        ETTYP LIKE VBEP-ETTYP,
        EDATU LIKE VBEP-EDATU.
TYPES: END OF TYP_COLL_ORD.
DATA: INT_COLL_ORD TYPE TABLE OF TYP_COLL_ORD WITH HEADER LINE.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TYP_VBUK,
        AUART LIKE VBAK-AUART, u201Chave added this field
        VBELN LIKE VBUK-VBELN,
        UVALL LIKE VBUK-UVALL,
        CMGST LIKE VBUK-CMGST.
TYPES: END OF TYP_VBUK.
DATA: INT_VBUK TYPE TABLE OF TYP_VBUK WITH HEADER LINE.
*QUERY#1 u2013 for VBAK & VBUK Join
SELECT A~AUART B~VBELN B~UVALL B~CMGST
INTO TABLE INT_VBUK
FROM VBAK AS A INNER JOIN VBUK AS B
ON A~VBELN EQ B~VBELN
WHERE A~VBELN IN s_VBELN AND
A~auart in s_auart AND
A~vkorg in s_vkorg AND
A~vbtyp eq 'C' AND
B~UVALL NE 'A'.
IF NOT INT_VBUK[] IS INITIAL.
SORT INT_VBUK BY VBELN.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM INT_VBUK COMPARING VBELN.
*QUERY#2 u2013 for VBAP & VBEP Join
SELECT A~VBELN A~POSNR A~MATNR A~KWMENG A~KBMENG A~ERDAT A~ERZET A~PSTYV B~ETTYP B~EDATU
INTO TABLE INT_COLL_ORD
FROM VBAP AS A INNER JOIN VBEP AS B
ON B~VBELN EQ A~VBELN AND B~POSNR EQ A~POSNR AND B~MANDT EQ A~MANDT
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN INT_VBUK
WHERE A~VBELN = INT_VBUK-VBELN AND
( ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_sp AND zz_msposnr NE 0 AND kbmeng EQ 0 )
OR ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_fp AND kwmeng NE A~kbmeng ) ) AND
A~ABGRU EQ SPACE AND
A~MTVFP IN R_MTVFP AND
A~PRCTR IN R_PRCT AND
B~ETENR EQ '1'.
ENDIF.
SORT INT_COLL_ORD BY VBELN POSNR ETTYP.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM INT_COLL_ORD
    COMPARING VBELN POSNR.
CHECK NOT INT_COLL_ORD[] IS INITIAL.
LOOP AT INT_COLL_ORD.
    CLEAR: L_MTART,L_ATPPR,L_ETTYP.
    IF L_PREVIOUS_ETTYP NE INT_COLL_ORD-ETTYP OR
      L_PREVIOUS_AUART NE INT_COLL_ORD-AUART.
      READ TABLE INT_OVRCTL WITH KEY AUART = INT_COLL_ORD-AUART ETTYP = INT_COLL_ORD-ETTYP.
      CHECK SY-SUBRC NE 0.
Now, the issue is:
Please note that declaration for INT_COLL_ORD has a field AUART, which is used in further parts of program (see the statement just above)
But, since neither VBAP nor VBEP contains AUART field, it cannot be fetched through the QUERY#2. So this value is not populated into INT_COLL_ORD through SELECT Query.
Since this field is used in later part of program & that the internal table has no value for this field, it dumps!!
How to include this value into the INT_COLL_ORD?
Plz suggest....

Select query for inner join

Hi all,
give me the query with innerjoin
Based on the input values of Material number (MARC-MATNR) from selection screen check and get the Special Procurement type details from MARC-SOBSL and Material description details from MAKT-MAKTX.
basha....
Moderator message - instead of asking, you should try to write the code yourself and get back to the forum if you have a specific question.
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Apr 19, 2009 4:46 PM

Hi,
Please Test the following Sample Code it is according to your requirement hope will solve out your problem,
TABLES: marc.
SELECt-OPTIONS somatnr for marc-matnr.
TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_matnr,
matnr LIKE marc-matnr,
sobsl LIKE marc-sobsl,
maktx LIKE makt-maktx,
END OF ty_matnr.
DATA: it_matnr TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF ty_matnr WITH HEADER LINE.
SELECT marc~matnr marc~sobsl makt~maktx
into CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_matnr
from marc INNER JOIN makt on ( marc~matnr eq makt~matnr )
WHERE marc~matnr in somatnr.
Best Regards,
Faisal

SELECT Query design with JOINS

Dear Users,
In one of our requirements, we have a SELECT query which joins a few tables together and selects a few fields from each table.
Example: Fields 1,2 and 3 from Table 1
Fields 4 and 5 from Table 2.
These fields are later displayed in the form of an ALV. However, the end user wants more fields on the output, let's say field 6 from Table 2. Due to this requirement, I have to amend the SELECT query to add field 6 of Table 2.
The above example is simple since it only involves 2 tables. However, in reality, we have a SELECT query with INNER JOINS on more than 6 tables and we don't want to change the code when someone asks for an additional field from one of these tables. Is there any way by which I can design my SELECT query (Using field symbols or dynamic selections etc) such that I don't have to amend the SELECT query and instead I should be able to maintain the field required by the user and it's source table name in a Z-Table and the SELECT automatically picks it up ? Thanks!
Vijay

better you can create a view on your 6 or more tables and select the fields .
Use Select * from <view name> every time in a select statement.
If you need a additional column then just change the view , there is no need to change of your select query.
with regards
Edited by: Avenai on Jun 28, 2010 2:09 PM

Issue when Run Report with Hier selection   in the Portal

Hi Portal BI Experts,
we are finding a strange issue when Running the Report.
the following Variables are in the Report Selection screen :
Company code [optiona]
Prod.Variance Type [ mandatory]
Hierarchy Node Variable [optional]
TheQuery which I am Running thro Bex Analyzer with the Hier selection as below , is working fine. But
When I run   thro portal with Hier selection value   with    00/50/G310/702258(0CUST_SALES
It automatically display as +00/50/G310/702258(0CUST_SALES    with + symbol. and thro the error:
Input "\+00/50/G310/702258(0CUST_SALES);\+00/51/G410/703096(0CUST_SALES)" for Ship-To Party (Sales has invalid format
If I remove the plus symbol report runnig fine.
Your immediate help highly appreciated.
Thanks
Hema
Edited by: hemav on Mar 21, 2011 2:29 PM

Hi Jaya,
This is the Error message I am facing when I Execute ithe query report n the Web[Portal]
Input "\+00/50/G310/702258(0CUST_SALES);\+00/51/G410/703096(0CUST_SALES)" for Ship-To Party (Sales has invalid format
ie. In the variable screen the selected hier value automaticvally display with plus symbol
Actual   Hier value :   00/50/G310/702258(0CUST_SALES)
Once close the Hier selection list window , the Hier value turned to +00/50/G310/702258(0CUST_SALES)
If I give ok with this Plus symbol it throwing the above error. By removing the Plus symbol manually it is working fine.
I unable locate the settings.
that too when I run the same report in Bex Analyzer woking fine , no issues in the Hier value.
Thanks ,
Hema

PDF forms have problems displaying text and only appears when the field is selected

Hello,
I created some pdf forms to distribute to the company clients. But we are having some people complaining about the text visibility. When they have work in team, the pdf that they receive from a third person often appears unfill or without text, the text is only visible when the field is selected. I need to find a solution for this because our company products are base on this forms.
If there is any addition information that I should add to understand what is happening and how to fix it, I'll be happy to write it.
In the company, we all have mac and the forms where created innitially in Adobe acrobat 9 pro, but we have now Adobe acropabt XI pro.
The users have both Mac and Windows systems.
Thank you,

This is usually caused by the form being filled-in and saved by a Mac user who is using the Preview application to view the PDF. More information is here: http://kb2.adobe.com/community/publishing/885/cpsid_88564.html
It is a good idea to inform your users that Adobe Reader (or Acrobat) should be used to work with the forms.

I reinstall the Yosemite due to the wifi issue, when finished, the iMovie was not installed, I try to download it from app store, but it's not free. How can I get iMovie back?

I'm using a mid 2014 13" rmbp. I reinstall the Yosemite due to the wifi issue, when finished, the iMovie was not installed, I try to download it from app store, but it's not free. How can I get iMovie back?

It's something to do with the main user account (not iTunes account) on my Mac because I logged in with another account and it downloaded fine, I installed it on the HDD and even though the date in App Store was 16th October 2014, it is the full installer of 10.10.2.
To try to resolve this problem, I have copied the installer app elsewhere and deleted it but App Store still will not allow me to download it with my main user account yet just allowed me to update iTunes.
I had a brainwave last night that it might have been related to me changing the default downloads folder to one not on my boot drive (to save disk space on my main boot drive) but having changed it back, tried again, rebooted and tried yet again, deleted my App Store preferences. nothing has worked.

Can we handle exceptions for the expressions in select query?

Hi all,
Can we handle exceptions for the expressions in select query.
I created a view, there I am extracting a substring from a character data and expected that as a number.
For example consider the following query.
SQL> select to_number( substr('r01',2,2) ) from dual;
TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR('R01',2,2))
1
Here we got the value as "1".
Consider the following query.
SQL> select to_number( substr('rr1',2,2) ) from dual;
select to_number( substr('rr1',2,2) ) from dual
ORA-01722: invalid number
For this I got error. Because the substr returns "r1" which is expected to be as number. So it returns "Invalid number".
So, without using procedures or functions can we handle these type of exceptions?
I am using Oracle 10 G.
Thanks in advance.
Thank you,
Regards,
Gowtham Sen.

SQL> select decode(ltrim(rtrim(translate(substr('r21', 2, 2), '0123456789', ' ' ), ' '), ' '), null, (substr('r21', 2, 2)), null) from dual;
DE
21
SQL> ed a
SQL> select decode(ltrim(rtrim(translate(substr('rr1', 2, 2), '0123456789', ' ' ), ' '), ' '), null, (substr('rr1', 2, 2)), null) from dual;
D
-

Adding the field in selection screen

Hi Guru's,
how can i add the field in selection screen of t code qa33.
can any one help me pls.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Rakhi.

You can enhance the standard program RQEEAL10 using implicit enhancement points.
Click the spiral (Enhance) button (Shift + F4)
Go to Edit -> Enhancement operations -> Show Implicit Enhancement Poitns
Create an Enhancement Implementation and include your code there.
See the following link -> Source Code Enhancements - Part 5 of the Series on the New Enhancement Framework
Hope it helps
Neeraj

Not able to see Metadata fields when adding the fields to the rule in UCM

Not able to see Metadata fields when adding the fields to the rule even after creating them in information fields of configuration manager.It is happening for few fields only.We are using 10.1.3 version of UCM.Kindly provide a solution if any.

Dhilipan,
I am trying to setup AES at the current Customer.
You are right on LR_JP to be linked to customs code list instead of ACE and I do achieve that if I were to maintain the Custom code list by maintaining the assignment for EAR in a separate test.
I was infact trying to follow the link: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/30c7015e-c191-2d10-71b9-95907dc8edd1?overridelayout=t…
On this document, if you look at page# 14 thru 17, it has the steps I described in my original note with customs code still appearing in the drop down for 'EXCPT' for EAR.
Nevertheless, I wanted to default Type = C50 when the license type for the line on the Customs declaration is 'EXCPT' but if you see the very last screen-shot below, even though the license type configuration has default value as 'C50' it did not get pulled into the line item Documents tab when I tried to pick the category as 'CUII'.
Let me know your thoughts on defaulting the data into Customs declaration for AES filing.
What I want to achieve is the following:
When License type is 'EXCPT', system should default the type as 'C50'
Should put the License type 'EXCPT' into the number field
Should put the actual License# 'ENC' into the Supplement field
Should put the ECCN # '5A002' into the Details field
Thanks,
Prashant.

Getting an error when i am execution a BI query using ABAP.

Hi Expert,
I am getting an error when i am execution a BI query using ABAP. Its Giving me this Error "The Info Provider properties for GHRGPDM12 are not the same as the system default" and in the error analysis it saying as bellow.
Property Data Integrity has been set differently to the system default.
Current setting: 0 for GHRGPDM12
System default: u2019 7 u2018
As I am very new to BI and have very limited knowledge, so I am not able to understand this problem. Can any one help me to resolving this issue. Previously it as working fine, I am getting this error last 2 days.
when i am debugging , I am getting error from
create instance of cl_rsr_request
CREATE OBJECT r_request
EXPORTING
i_genuniid = p_genuniid.
this FM. Its not able to create the object. Can any one please help me out.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Satrajit

Hi,
I am able to solve this problem
Regards
Satrajit

Absolute dynamic select query with dynamic join and where

Has anyone ever tried creating an absolutely dynamic SELECT query with dynamic Join and Where conditions.
I have a requirement of creating such a query in an Utility Class, and i have written the code. But its throwing my sysntax errors.
Please let me know where am I going wrong OR is it really possible to create such a dynamic Query??
    SELECT (FIELDS) INTO TABLE IT_TABLES
      FROM ( (ME->TABLE1) inner join ( me->table2 )
      on ( on_condition ) )
      WHERE (me->where_fields).
Ags.

It worked for me in a following way:
select * into corresponding fields of table <result_table>
        from (join_string)
        where (l_where).
Where the contents of join_string were dynamically build using concatenation. So it will be something like
concatenate ME->TABLE1 'as a INNER JOIN' me->table2 'as b ON (' into join_string separated by space.
<...>
add here matching/reference colums, something like
concatenate 'a~' me->TABLE1_JOIN_COL into temp1.
concatenate 'b~' me->TABLE2_JOIN_COL into temp2.
concatenate join_string temp1 '=' temp2 into join_string separated by space.
<...>
concatenate join_string ')' into join_string separated by space.
And then use similar approach for l_where variable.

Issue when suming the field in Select query using inner join

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for