MD04 issue with BOM Material

HI
We have a scenario where Sales order is Created with BOM Material. Sales order has been saved, delivered and Billed.
But still the BOM Material is shown in MD04, we tried running the Correction program SDRQCR21, but still the BOM Material shown in MD04.
Can anyone help on this issue.
Thanks

hi,
please check,
whether TECO has been done for production order from PP perspective.
after this the requriment from MD04 should disappear and finally refresh it.
you are requested to search the FORUM sir.
regarsds,
balajia

Similar Messages

While creating SO with BOM material, plant is getting grayed out.

Hi,
I am trying to create a sales order with BOM material.
As soon as I give the material, sub items are getting added but I am not able to modify the plant for main item, fields such as plant, item category are gettinh grayed out.
Is this related to item category or any other setting,
Please help me.
Thanks,
Pramod.

Hi,
The field is getting greyed, because you created BOM for perticular plant and it's unique.
Second is about to item category, when explode bom in sales order then main item become HIGHER LEVEL ITEM,and all other are child or sub item,once it is at higher level it is in display mode,
Kapil

Issue with Phantom Material in PCE

Hi,
While creating the PCE for one of the finished materials, in the PCE, the phantom material is not getting selected.
There is no issue with the production version or BOM or Master recipe since in the process order after the BOM explosion the phantom material is being picked up.
The costing date of the PCE is also as per the production version validity date. In the BOM & master the phantom item is maintained for costing.
Let me know what else could be missing.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Abhijit

There is no problem with the costing run. If a material is marked as a phantom assembly (that is, it has a special procurement type with procurement type: In-house production and special procurement: Phantom assembly ), costing directly explodes the BOM and calculates the planned costs for all material components in the phantom assembly. These material components are displayed and updated in the cost estimate of the higher-level material, but not in the phantom assembly. The idea is, phantom assemblies are not needed to be costed as they are not valuated and neither stock is maintained for them. But their cost structure is exploded properly for the costing run.

Issue with the material field in ME23N after upgrade

Hi Experts,
We are having an issue with transaction ME23N in ECC6.0 after upgrade from 4.6c.
In this transaction for the given PO the value of the material is not populating. The material coloumn is displaying but the value of the material is not coming.
For the same PO with the same data we are able to see the material number in ME23N in 4.6c.
Please help me to resolve this.
Thanks,
Rakesh

Hi,
If you are a functional consultant then check the configuration settings in SPRO and compare it with the one in 4.6c system to find if the material number display in ME23N is enabled in your new system or not. Go to tcode SPRO and Material Management-> Purchasing->Purchase Order->Define Screen Layout at Document level.
Execute this and select on ME21N or tcode that you are having problem with. Then press details button and double click on Enjoy fields. Check if it Display check box is ticked or not.
KR Jaideep,

Goods Issue for BOM material thru SD route

Hi Experts,
I have to carry out Goods issue of BOMB material (Main Material + Components) using Sales BOM. Currently I donot find any config setting that allows me to carry out goods issue thru SD route. Currently we are carrying out this transaction using IS-OIL TD route which is a standard functionality.
Can experts guide me how I can carry out this transaction using SD route. What will be the setting required etc.
Thanks in Advance,
Casimer.

Hello Francis,
I did not understand why master of Configurable material is required. It is simple oil bom. The bom is maintained using CS01. The item category is set as required.
Sales order / Delivery gets created. As the main item is not in stock, no sloc is entered for this line item only the valuation type is assigned. For the component, the sloc and the valuation is assigned. After entering these data in the delivery and clicking on Post goods button, system gives error message like not stock for main item etc.
Actually the system shall make material to material transfer in the background from component to main item and issue main item thru mvt 601.
Can u adivse on this.
regards

Issue with creating materialized view

Hi,
We have a select query (containing joins, aggregates and UNION ALL’s) using which we are creating materialized views. We were able to create these mat views in development environment, however when tried to run the same scripts in a higher environment the creation never completes. The higher environment has three times more data than in Dev currently.
The below operations complete well in time , but when we add “CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW MAT_VIEW_NAME” to the select query it takes forever (we have cancelled the operation after waiting for more 1 hour)
Select count(1) from the complete Mat. View query -     takes 3.2 min to complete - the query resullts in      3,010,068 rows
Create Normal VIEW using complete Mat. View select query -     takes      3.06 sec     to complete
Create table using complete Mat. View select query     takes 5.75 min to complete - the query resullts in           3,010,068
Does anyone have an idea why this could be happening ? if you have ever faced this kind of issue, can you please provide pointers on how you were able to solve the problem. We are using Oracle 11g.
Let me know if I have to provide any other information for you to understand the issue better.
Thanks

SELECT vis.uid, findet.yr, findet.ect, vis.ind,
tm_view.col1_id, tm_view.col1_name,
tm_view.col2_id, tm_view.col2_name,
tm_view.col3_id, tm_view.col3_name,
clnt.cl_id, clnt.cl_nm,
prodparent_view.parent_cd,
prodparent_view.parent_desc,
prod_view.parent_cd,
prod_view.parent_desc,
prod_view.child_cd,
prod_view.child_desc,
SUM (value1), SUM (value2),
SUM (value3), SUM (value4),
SUM (value5), SUM (value6),
SUM (value7), SUM (value8),
SUM (value9), SUM (value10),
SUM (value11), SUM (value12)
FROM vis,
(SELECT *
FROM analytic_e,
(SELECT table_val
FROM TAB_CHECK s
WHERE s.tgt_table_nm = 'ANALYTIC'
AND s.table_val = 'ANALYTIC_E')
WHERE table_val = 'ANALYTIC_E'
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM analytic_o,
(SELECT switch_val
FROM tab_check s
WHERE s.tgt_table_nm = 'ANALYTIC'
AND s.switch_val = 'ANALYTIC_O')
WHERE switch_val = 'ANALYTIC_O') findet,
prod_view,
prodparent_view,
tm_view,
clnt,
(select to_number(to_char(ref_dt,'yyyy'))-1 year_agg from DATE_TABLE) tbabt
WHERE tbabt.yr = findet.yr
AND vis.cl_key = findet.cl_key
AND tm_view.hi_key = findet.hi_key
AND prod_view.child_cd = findet.prod_cd
AND clnt.cl_key = findet.cl_key
AND prodparent_view.child_cd = prod_view.parent_cd
GROUP BY vis.uid, findet.yr, findet.ect, vis.ind,
tm_view.col1_id, tm_view.col1_name,
tm_view.col2_id, tm_view.col2_name,
tm_view.col3_id, tm_view.col3_name,
clnt.cl_id, clnt.cl_nm,
prodparent_view.parent_cd
prodparent_view.parent_desc
prod_view.parent_cd
prod_view.parent_desc
prod_view.child_cd
prod_view.child_desc
Higher Environment
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 57M| 65G| | 20M (1)| 66:48:28 | | |
| 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 57M| 65G| 73G| 20M (1)| 66:48:28 | | |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 57M| 65G| | 109K (2)| 00:21:58 | | |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | HIER | 2100 | 244K| | 172 (0)| 00:00:03 | | |
|* 4 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | UK_HIER | 2100 | | | 16 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 5 | HASH JOIN | | 57M| 59G| | 109K (1)| 00:21:52 | | |
| 6 | VIEW | VW_GBF_25 | 1908 | 868K| | 2612 (1)| 00:00:32 | | |
| 7 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1908 | 141K| | 2612 (1)| 00:00:32 | | |
| 8 | VIEW | | 45107 | 3347K| | 2609 (1)| 00:00:32 | | |
| 9 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | | | |
| 10 | HASH UNIQUE | | 22518 | 1473K| 1872K| 1010 (1)| 00:00:13 | | |
|* 11 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 22518 | 1473K| | 650 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
| 12 | HASH UNIQUE | | 22518 | 1165K| 1512K| 947 (1)| 00:00:12 | | |
|* 13 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 22518 | 1165K| | 650 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
| 14 | HASH UNIQUE | | 71 | 1917 | | 652 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 22518 | 593K| | 650 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
|* 16 | HASH JOIN | | 64M| 38G| 4936K| 106K (1)| 00:21:16 | | |
| 17 | VIEW | | 45107 | 4404K| | 2609 (1)| 00:00:32 | | |
| 18 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | | | |
| 19 | HASH UNIQUE | | 22518 | 1473K| 1872K| 1010 (1)| 00:00:13 | | |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 22518 | 1473K| | 650 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
| 21 | HASH UNIQUE | | 22518 | 1165K| 1512K| 947 (1)| 00:00:12 | | |
|* 22 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 22518 | 1165K| | 650 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
| 23 | HASH UNIQUE | | 71 | 1917 | | 652 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
|* 24 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 22518 | 593K| | 650 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
|* 25 | HASH JOIN | | 3021K| 1550M| 15M| 24492 (1)| 00:04:54 | | |
| 26 | PARTITION HASH ALL | | 491K| 10M| | 1059 (1)| 00:00:13 | 1 | 16 |
| 27 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | VIS | 491K| 10M| | 1059 (1)| 00:00:13 | 1 | 16 |
|* 28 | HASH JOIN | | 388K| 190M| 6056K| 12929 (1)| 00:02:36 | | |
| 29 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | CLNT | 64540 | 5294K| | 411 (1)| 00:00:05 | | |
|* 30 | HASH JOIN | | 388K| 159M| | 4072 (1)| 00:00:49 | | |
| 31 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | DATE_TABLE | 2 | 16 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 32 | VIEW | | 582K| 235M| | 4065 (1)| 00:00:49 | | |
| 33 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | | | |
| 34 | NESTED LOOPS | | 272K| 52M| | 1860 (1)| 00:00:23 | | |
|* 35 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TAB_CHECK | 1 | 46 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 36 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | SYS_C0041157 | 1 | | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 37 | PARTITION RANGE ALL | | 272K| 40M| | 1859 (1)| 00:00:23 | 1 |1048575|
| 38 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ANALYTIC_E | 272K| 40M| | 1859 (1)| 00:00:23 | 1 |1048575|
| 39 | NESTED LOOPS | | 309K| 58M| | 2205 (1)| 00:00:27 | | |
|* 40 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TAB_CHECK | 1 | 46 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 41 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | SYS_C0041157 | 1 | | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 42 | PARTITION RANGE ALL | | 309K| 44M| | 2204 (1)| 00:00:27 | 1 |1048575|
| 43 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ANALYTIC_O | 309K| 44M| | 2204 (1)| 00:00:27 | 1 |1048575|
Development
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1696K| 1276M| | 291K (1)| 00:58:20 | | |
| 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1696K| 1276M| 1325M| 291K (1)| 00:58:20 | | |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 1696K| 1276M| | 9721 (2)| 00:01:57 | | |
| 3 | VIEW | | 15464 | 1132K| | 1855 (1)| 00:00:23 | | |
| 4 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | | | |
| 5 | HASH UNIQUE | | 7681 | 502K| | 618 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
|* 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 7681 | 502K| | 617 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
| 7 | HASH UNIQUE | | 7681 | 375K| | 618 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
|* 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 7681 | 375K| | 617 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
| 9 | HASH UNIQUE | | 102 | 2448 | | 618 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 7681 | 180K| | 617 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
|* 11 | HASH JOIN | | 371K| 252M| | 7847 (2)| 00:01:35 | | |
| 12 | VIEW | | 15464 | 1510K| | 1855 (1)| 00:00:23 | | |
| 13 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | | | |
| 14 | HASH UNIQUE | | 7681 | 502K| | 618 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 7681 | 502K| | 617 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
| 16 | HASH UNIQUE | | 7681 | 375K| | 618 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 7681 | 375K| | 617 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
| 18 | HASH UNIQUE | | 102 | 2448 | | 618 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
|* 19 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 7681 | 180K| | 617 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
|* 20 | HASH JOIN | | 122K| 71M| | 5987 (2)| 00:01:12 | | |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 7681 | 915K| | 617 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
|* 22 | HASH JOIN | | 122K| 57M| 4512K| 5368 (2)| 00:01:05 | | |
|* 23 | HASH JOIN | | 9556 | 4395K| 3856K| 2409 (2)| 00:00:29 | | |
| 24 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | CLNT | 74426 | 2979K| | 310 (1)| 00:00:04 | | |
|* 25 | HASH JOIN | | 9556 | 4012K| | 1710 (2)| 00:00:21 | | |
| 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | DATE_TABLE | 1 | 7 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 27 | VIEW | | 19112 | 7894K| | 1706 (2)| 00:00:21 | | |
| 28 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | | | |
| 29 | MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN | | 19111 | 4068K| | 1701 (2)| 00:00:21 | | |
|* 30 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TAB_CHECK | 1 | 49 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 31 | BUFFER SORT | | 248K| 40M| | 1698 (2)| 00:00:21 | | |
| 32 | PARTITION RANGE ALL| | 248K| 40M| | 1698 (2)| 00:00:21 | 1 |1048575|
| 33 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ANALYTIC_E | 248K| 40M| | 1698 (2)| 00:00:21 | 1 |1048575|
| 34 | MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN | | 1 | 537 | | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 35 | PARTITION RANGE ALL | | 1 | 488 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 |1048575|
| 36 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ANALYTIC_O | 1 | 488 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 |1048575|
| 37 | BUFFER SORT | | 1 | 49 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 38 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TAB_CHECK | 1 | 49 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 39 | PARTITION HASH ALL | | 810K| 16M| | 1456 (2)| 00:00:18 | 1 | 16 |
| 40 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | VIS | 810K| 16M| | 1456 (2)| 00:00:18 | 1 | 16 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Issue with Customer Material Number in sales order

Hi All,
I am facing one strange issue.
Accoding to the flow of my client system the customer Material number is automaticlly populated while creating the line item in sales order. The Customer Material number come from the Configuration of the Item.
This is working properly in the quality system but in the prodcution system for some cases this customer material number is not coming.
The customer material is not coming in production only some times other wise it works properly.
I am not able to understand what may be the issue as it is working properly in the quality and in the procudtion it is not coming only for some line item.
Kindly help.

That depends on either configuration used in your system or any enhamcement used.
So check the cases for which they have configured it or used any enhancement.

Issues with BOM in Oracle

Hi DBA gurus,
We have Oracle 10g/11g and Operating System : Windows
While inserting XML data in CLOB datatype we are getting *¿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>* in the data. I suspect this is BOM (Byte Order Mark) related issue.
The settings of NLS in our database are :
NLS_CHARACTERSET WE8MSWIN1252
NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET AL16UTF16
Is this database related issue ? I have read somewhere that this issue is related to UNICODE. Please advise to get rid of this special character.
Thanks.

Hi!
Try the following
find / -name rman
This command looks for a file called rman. These file should normaly be located in $ORACLE_HOME/bin. If it is not then it may be deleted or something. Try to reinstall it (copy all the files of the bin directory from another oracle installation).
Hope this helps!

Issue with BOM Exploder User exit

Hi
We are facing perfomance issue and for BOM Extract program
Below are the details:
I am trying to execute the report for range of items from and to Bom Items (The countof records is 61972).
API used:BOMPEXPL.EXPLODER_USEREXIT
Could you please advice us if any if any fix is avaliable Resolve this issue.
Thanks in Advance
Kamalakar.G

Please post the details of the application release, database version and OS.
We are facing perfomance issue and for BOM Extract program
Below are the details:What is the concurrent program name?
I am trying to execute the report for range of items from and to Bom Items (The countof records is 61972).
API used:BOMPEXPL.EXPLODER_USEREXIT
Could you please advice us if any if any fix is avaliable Resolve this issue.Was this working before? If yes, any changes have been done recently?
Do you have the statistics collected up to date?
Enable trace and submit the concurrent program again and get the TKPROF file to find out why it takes long time to run.
Thanks,
Hussein

Issue with BOM Status in MRP Run

Dear All,
I have a BOM structure and BOM status as attached below.
In this case, system is generating the PR's for all three components correctly while i run MRP (MD51). But when i convert planned order to production order for "Assembly" & "BOM", it is coping the components for Assembly correctly but not for "BOM".
If i maintain the BOM status as "4" for "BOM", then the components are copied into Production Order but i am getting double PR's as the BOM is exploding two times.
As per my requirement BOM should be exploded only one time ie. for "Assembly" and component should be come in Planned order for "BOM".
Please tell me where is the problem..
Regards,
Rao

Dear Rao,
assembly and Bom have the same type of production order?
In the production order type which application is contained? PP01?
You should check the explosion setting in the profile order and the setting of application of the Bom.
if you can send me screen shot of the planned order of the Bom (components details).
Thanks
Daniele

Problem with BOM (packaging material) in order change

Hi Gurus,
In my b2b shop, i have created an order with BOM material and that order contains one main material and a sub item material after update or order. When i open the same order and click on change, when i click on update, a new sub item is getting added as a main item.
Details:
item 10 is 12007492 (main material)
item 20 is 12007491(sub item for the main material)
when i click on update,again one more sub item 30 is getting added.
When i check the logs, all the items guids are getting passed to IN of crm_isa_basket_changeitems functions module. But when check it in runtime using external debuggin mode, the sub item guid is blank.
Then the main material is again getting exploded and the sub item is coming at item 20 and actual sub item before update is shifting to item 30 as new item.
Please help me in this regard why it is happening like this.
Thank you
Lakshman

Hello Lakshman,
I had the same issue, however my backend system was ERP and not CRM. In any case, the logic might be the same.
When a BOM material is sent to the backend system for simulation/save, only the header needs to be sent. By this, backend system will explode the material and send 2 items back. I guess in your case, ISA is sending both items to SAP and that is the reason you are getting back 3 items.
Simplest approach is to write some logic in your backend class to avoid sending this subitem to SAP. You can achieve this by manupulating the items table sent to SAP
Suppose salesDoc is the ISA document and itemsTable is the JCO table that is sent to SAP as a table parameter:
               ItemList itemList = salesDoc.getItems();
               for (Iterator iter = itemList.iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
                    ItemSalesDoc itemSalesDoc = (ItemSalesDoc) iter.next();
                    TechKey parentKey = itemSalesDoc.getParentId();
                    if(null!=parentKey){
                         if (!parentKey.getIdAsString().equalsIgnoreCase("")) {
                            //Here remove it from the tables parameter which is sent to SAP
                                           itemsTable.deleteRow(i);
I am not too sure how it would work for CRM, but works in ERP.
Pradeep

Provision for sevices entry cost addit in BOM material

Hi GURU's
       I client want to services cost is also to be added to the material production cost as with the BOM.
      ex. suppose production qnty. is 100 ton& BOM materials qnty & cost is suppose 10 & 100/-. and the services charges (cost) is suppose 100/- per ton then the cost of services is appended on the Production material with BOM material cost.
     Is thier any provision to append services cost on the production material against process order.
Thanks in Adavance for ur immediate intimate.
Parminder Sikarwar

Hi
There is no direct link between Movement type and Cost element G/L account. It is not advisable to change the standard movement type 261 for BOM components for GI in OPKA.
The possible way to have a new G/L account in BOM cost element field as per u r requirement is to create new valuation class and assign it to Material master of u r Non stock material in Accounting view
Steps
1) Create a new valuation class say ZVCL in OMSK and complete all relevant settings
2) Now in OBYC > GBB > for VBR >for New Valuation class ZVCL > Assign G/L AC no say xxxxxx in Debit and Credit columns
3) Then Assign this valuation class in Material Master.
4) Now chk the G/L account in BOM as u mentioned and observe it as xxxxxx
Regards
Brahmaji

BOM material in VA01.

Hi gurus,
when i do sales order VA01 with BOM material (non sotck ) only price it s appearing in gray colour.
but below components are not appearing in gray colour. and it s having different Item catagery with Z.
how to get the Components (stok material ) line item should be in Gray color. so thet w
Thanksin advance,
Anthyodaya.

hi
In my experience BOMs work if all maintenance has been done properly.in your case, there is some disparity in the config
A number of things to check is:
1. The bom hasn't been defined for the plant used, or you haven't defined the plant in SO.
2. Main item category - has BOM application SD01 been assigned to it?
3. Item categories for main items and sub-items have not been mainteined properly.
4. Sales items maintenance - You should assign item categories for BOM header items and sub-items to a specific sales doc.
5. Has the BOM itself been configured properly (i.e. right plant, BOM usage '5')?
6. Are you trying it out on an order created after all BOM maintenance was done?
7. Also , what's the 'Structure scope' set as? Anything except C may be useful here? We have that set to A, since our BOMs are all single-level. You could set it to B if BOM are configured multi-level.
Those are probably main reasons why BOM shouldn't work. Apart from that, just re-check your whole config - the truth is out there somwhere.
with regards
baalakrushnan.da

Issue with update of BOM by Variant Config - Cost relevant indicator

Hi All VC Expert,
We are facing an issue with the update by reference characteristic of the field STPO-SANKA Cost relevancy indicator on the BOM.
We are on SAP ECC 6.0 release 700 on Oracle
Hot Package
- SAPKA70015 on ERP Cross Application componenent
- SAPKH60013 on SAP-APPL Logistics and accouting
We are using material variant
We are on the first level of configuration
Classically, we built a procedure to set X to this data base field as below :
$self.STPO_SANKA = 'X'
We assigned this procedure to the relevant items
Here is the result we have:
At the creation of the Plan Order, this is not working
At the creation of the Prod Order, this is not working
When we do a Reload PP master data, this is working very well
On CU50/VA02 when we check the trace, the procedure is executed.
Do somebody have an idea or already facing this and solve it ?
Thanks in advance for your appreciated help.

Hi Fabien. Did you solve your problem?

Purchase Order With Sub Item Component List for BOM material..??

Hi MM Experts,
We want to create PO with a component list that should be appears under the main item.
The component list is a mterial BOM.
Ex:- bom MATERIAL - CATALOG1 (Non Stock Materials)
COMPONENT 1 :-ABCD
COMPONENT 2 :- XYZ.
WHEN I ENTER THE BOM MATERIAL:- CATALOG1 IN /ME21N . Higher-Level Item-
Automatically botom line should be appear component 1 , 2 as a Sub Item.
how to configur this issue..?? Its a standard Ponot Subcontract
Thanks,
NAR.

Hi!
If you have correctly maintained the BOM in CS01, make sure that in ME21N you enter "L" as the item category, and then, in the field "material", enter the finished product (the header material in your BOM). Then, enter all other required fields.
When all mandatory data has been completed in ME21N, go to the "Material Data" tab. Here you will see an icon named "Components". If you click this icon, the materials in your BOM will be listed here.
So, please, do not expect the BOM to be displayed with mother and daugther segments in the item overview of ME21N. Instead, consider that you will only be able to see the components if you click the "Components" icon under the "Material Data" tab at item detail level.
I hope this helps!
Esther.

MD04 issue with BOM Material

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for