Issue with plant in IL

Hi experts,
What can I do with my IL when the plant during IL creation was wrong and need to be repalced by the other one?
Is the only way to cancel this IL nad recreated it or maybe there is anthe way existing?
Thank you for your help.

The issue concers the plant stock field that is with the wrong data
Dear the only way is you need to cancel the inspection lot and create a new one if you haven't done UD and RR then you can cancel the material document through which that lot was created if you have done UD then you need to reverse the UD and then material document for reversing UD you need to apply note:174877.
Cheers
KK

Similar Messages

Issue with Plant to Plant Transfer Mvt type 301

Hi,
I'm trying to do a Plant to Plant Transfer using MB1B/MIGO,mvt type 301, from a plant / Storage location which is NON HU managed to a plant / Storage location which is HU Managed, I'm getting this error,
Message No : VL296.
HU cannot be delivrd from plant XXX stor. loc. XXX to plant YYYY stor. loc YYYY
Has anyone come across this error ? Any solutions?
Many thanks
Feroz

Hi Feroz
In HU-managed storage locations, materials can be managed in HUs only. Mixed stock made up of packed and non-packed materials within the same storage location are not supported. HUs can also be managed in interim storage types.
if you want to use 311 to move the material already in stock, but in a non HUM Storage Location and you want to transfer those materials into a HUM Storage Location 304. If this is the case you can use the transaction VLMOVE with the destination plant and storage location. Before that you have to create the HU with the transaction code HU02 Storage location: where the material is and the status: in stock
please refer to the below link for additional details
link[http://www.sap-img.com/sap-hu.htm]
Regards
Vikrant

BW 3.5 - Issue with formula variable with replacement path

Dear experts,
I'm facing an issue with formula variable with replacement path.
Just to clarify, I know replacement paths is raising a lot of questions but I've been using this functionnality extensively in the past, both in 7.0 and 3.5, so I'm not looking for basic information about how to use it.
I'm trying to setup a simple report that would show total values per plant of Purchase Order < 100
To do so I've setup a calculated key figure as follow:
VAR1 * ("PO value" < 100 ) * "PO value"
VAR1 is a formula variable with replacement path on 'purchase order' and value attribute 'constant =1'.
(The report has to show values summarized by plant but should not show the detail PO by PO, so I'm not looking at a solution based on condition)
The report as characteristic "plant" in rows and my CKF in columns.
Now let's take an example. I have 3 POs in Plant 1:
PO1 -> 150
PO2 -> 90
PO3 -> 80
Because of the variable with replacement path, the result in my query should be:
plant1 = 170 (even though characteristic "purchase order" is not in my rows, system should evaluate PO one by one and return values only for those two that are below 100).
But the result coming is 320, which is wrong.
I've done the same report on many other 3.5 systems and it worked perfectly, and I am not able to get proper support from SAP OSS who keep saying that this functionnality is not ready in 3.5 (although I've provided screenshot of this working on another 3.5 system!!! how frustrating...)
They have also pointed to problems of Before and After aggregation but that has absolutely no impact. Once again, the scenario is working perfectly on other 3.5 systems with the same query design, so i'm sure it has nothing to do with Query Designer options.
Would anyone have ever come to an equivalenet problem? I'm wondering whether the DB itself could not play a role in the variable with ref characteristic 'constant =1' ...
Any though is welcome!
thanks

Hi,
The text variable is replaced when the exact date is clear for this key figure column according to the restriction.
To achive this, please make sure that either the variable is directly restricted in the key figure selection, or that the date characteristic is in drilldown.
Regards,
Patricia

Performance issues with Bapi BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY...

Hello,
I have a Z program to check ATP which is working with Bapi BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY....
As I am in the retail system we have performance issues with this bapi due the huge amount of articles in the system we need to calculate the ATP.
any way to improve the performance?
Thanks and best regards
L

The BAPI appears to execute for only one plant/material, etc., at a time, so I would have to concentrate on making data retrieval and post-bapi processing as efficient as possible. In your trace output, how much of your overall time is consumed by the BAPI? How much by the other code? You might find improvements there...

Goods issue for plant maintenance order

Goods issue with ref to plant maintenance order( Componenets of the order) is not possible in transaction code MIGO. Error message " MIGO is not possible for the refurbishment order".
Goods issue for the same order can be posted with transaction MB!A.

hi santhosh
kindly check the order type .i think you are using MB1A for refurbishment process.but it is not possible.only maintenance order can be posted via MB1A
follow the procedure for goods issue in refurbishment order.
Choose Logistics ® Plant maintenance ® Maintenance processing ® Completion confirmation ® Goods movement ® Goods movement.
The entry screen for a goods issue appears.
Choose the pushbutton For order.
Enter the relevant order number in the dialog box and choose Continue.
An entry screen appears.
Choose Copy.
The Maintain Serial Numbers dialog box appears.
Choose Reference document.
Enter the order number in the Refurbishment order group box and choose Execute.
A list appears with the planned serial numbers for the refurbishment order.
Check the selections of serial numbers, for whose material you want to post a goods issue, and choose Copy.
The serial numbers are copied into the Maintain Serial Numbers dialog box.
Choose Exit window.
The goods issue is posted.
regards
thyagarajan

Issue with Postings-Profit center

Hello,
We have a issue with Spec. Purpose Ledger account.
There are 5 items in that account with 5 g/l accounts are updating. Out of 5, in 2 accounts profit center is updating wrongly.
When we check that one of them is updating tax value. The profit center is updating from defaulted profit center assigned to company code and that specific G/L account. This is because when the value of the profit center is blank from where it has to pick the profit center, then default profit center should come. So this case is happening.
Now I would like to know for tax values, from where the profit center will be picking.
Please reply if this information is not sufficient.
Best regards,
SASi

Hi,
To my information a Profit centre is mainly related to a u201Cdivision of productsu201D in Plant, in business, It is assign to in the Material Master in u201CSales General/Plantu201D Tab. So please go to u201CMM02u201D and check if the profit centre exists for that item/Material,
Also check with your FI people it is a core topic related to Special purpose ledgers.
Regards
DSR
Edited by: D.Srinivasa Rao on Nov 25, 2011 10:23 AM

Issue with PR conversion to PO using ME59 withqty of similar line items

Hi All,
I'm having an issue with PR conversion to PO using ME59
I have a PR with the following line items with all same details except quantity
ex 1
Mat Qty Unit Plant   St Loc
M1   1    EA   P1      S1
M1   29   EA   P1      S1
The PR brings in the Unit automatically
EA is Base Unit Of Measure -Material Master
BT is Order Unit           -Material Master
Conversion
30 EA = 1BT
When i convert this PR to PO using ME59N then i see 2 lines items
M1   1   BT
M2   1   BT
Its doubling the qty (2 BT = 60 EA)
ex 2
Mat Qty Unit Plant   St Loc
M1   1    EA   P1      S1
M1   2    EA   P1      S1
M1   27   EA   P1      S1
The PR brings in the Unit automatically
EA is Base Unit Of Measure -Material Master
BT is Order Unit           -Material Master
Conversion
30 EA = 1BT
When i convert this PR to PO using ME59N then i see 2 lines items
M1   1   BT
M1   1   BT
M1   1   BT
Its 3 times no
PR Qty = 30 EA
PO qty = 3 BT = 90 EA
I guess during conversion to PO
It sees PR Line item 1 and looks for another line items with similar fields ( in our case it sees line 2 in ex 1 and 2 and 3 in ex 2)
i adds the qty 1 and 29 in ex1 and converts the total 30 each to 1 BT and when it moves to 2 line it see item1 and again creates 1BT but the line item 2 was already considered and it should be ignored
Similarly if you see ex2 then it creates 3 limes with 1 BT each
Let me know how to resolve this issue
Thanks

As for std SAP ME59N - make sure there is not rounding value is activated in the Material master as well as info record
If this is not the case than check any custom code is activated for ME59N
becuase generally in many compnay when they use ME59n they don't want the same material from diff PR to create the diff line item in the PO so using the custom logic in the user exist they trick the code
it might be the case for you where you have issue.

Having issue with variable after upgrade in bi7.0

Hi,
I have issue with variable
For example Plant info object has attributes country, company code, storage location
etc.
When I run the report. If I click on plant variable it is showing me the all the data for all country , compony code , storage location. I donot want this.
I just want only plant input values on variable screen
Thanks,
Naman Shah

Naman,
What is your SP level ?
Also the characteristics mentioned - are they compounding attributes ? if yes then tey will come in your variable entry.

Third-party not defined in the case of vendor with plant assignment ?

We use a Third-Party Vendor to direct-ship some products directly to our Customers.
When transfers third party order form's PR STO PO, prompts the following information
Third-party not defined in the case of vendor with plant assignment
Message no. 06769
Diagnosis
You are entering a purchase transaction involving a vendor to whom a plant has been assigned. Normally, this will involve the transfer of materials from one plant to another.
This process necessitates a delivery and a billing document in the SD system. The PO appears directly in the delivery due list of the issuing plant (vendor) and therefore does not need to be transmitted.
However, an item with the procurement form "third-party" (triangular business deal) cannot appear in the delivery due list.
Procedure
An item with the procurement form "third-party" can only be ordered from vendors without a plant assignment.
how should solve?
Many thanks, Adny.
Edited by: Andy Yao on Feb 8, 2010 3:58 AM

Hi Andy
Why u doing stock transfer order,in third party sales there is no stock transfer
Follow below procees for third party sales( Vendor ship materials directly to customer)
Create Sales order(Use item category TAS) >>> Purachase requisition(Automatically from order) >>> Purchase order >>> Vendor Invoice Verification >>> Invoice to customer
Kapil

PR: Procurement w/o material from vendor with plant assignment not defined

Hi,
Getting the error message: 06806 - Procurement w/o material from vendor with plant assignment not defined
while creating the PR with account assingment (P- project) & without material no. instead entering the short text in the PR.
this issue (Error message) is getting to only one user.
question-1: Is it possible to set the Error messages to the user specific. Because other users are able to create the PR with the above inputs, but the one user is not able to create instead getting the above E- Msg.
question-2: Is it possible to set the messages to Plant specific instead quesiton -1 or both
Or else, please let me know how to deactivate the above E-msg to the specific user.
Please do the needful asap.
Regards,
Sapsrin

Hi,
As you noticed, note 856962 has changed the system behaviour
when you are working with procurement w/o material from vendor with
plant assignment.
Items without a material master record can only be ordered from vendors
without a plant assignment.
This note will stop your users from creating service purchase orders
for a vendor who has a Plant assigned in the vendor master, issuing
the error message 06 806.
you can check the below code:-
LMEPOF23
IF ekpo-ematn IS INITIAL AND
      ( aktyp EQ hin OR ekko-reswk NE oekko-reswk OR      "856962
     ( aktyp EQ hin OR NOT ekko-reswk IS INITIAL OR        "856962
        ekko-bsakz NE oekko-bsakz OR
        gf_extended_check NE space ).
    PERFORM enaco_2(sapfmmex) USING '06' '806'.
regards,
Lalita

Profit center not updating with plant change

We have an issue with the profit center not updating with change in delivering plant.
A CSR entered a material on a sales order but the material is not extended to their location. They select a plant to deliver the material from. At this point the profit center fills in for that plant, from the material master.
The issue then is the material is not currently available at that plant so when the availability check is preformed the CSR checks for availability in another plant. They are able to find an available item at another location so they select that location.
When they save the sales order the plant reflects the new delivering plant, but the profit center still reflects the first selected plant. The profit center does not pull from the material master correctly.
Has anyone seen this issue before and developed a solution?

Hello Matthew
May be you have substitution defined in CO.
T codes 0KEM or 0KEL
See the following OSS notes:
167912 - Substitution call-up points for sales order/billing document
Hope this helps.

Sales organisation assignement with plant

Hello guys,
Happy new year to all,
We created a new plant ,maintain all necessary settings related to SD enterprise structure.
But when we see it in T001w table for enterprise structure,it is not showing
1)sales org.
2)dist channel
3)shipping point
Can you help me out here...
I am not a SD guy so please help me in this issue...
Enjoy SAP...

Hiiii
Table T001W is the master table of Plant. that show the all plants created in your system if it is not showing in the table that means plant not created. Now if you are getting the issue of plant during Sales order processing please ensure following
Whether the Sales organisation assign to Company Code (company code Which is assigned to your plant)
Whether Plant is assigned to Company code ( company code Which is assigned to sales Organisation)
Make proper assignment with Sales Organisation -- Distribution Channel -- Plant (this assignment make it delivering plant)
hope it will solve the problem. If not please let me know the exact error message
Regards
Shambhu Sarkar

Issue with BAPI_MATPHYSINV_CREATE_MULT

Hello All,
I am having some issues with the above BAPI. I am passing the appropriate header information and passing the material in the items table. However the return message states the material is not maintained in the plant I had specified.
In a previous piece of logic I had done my own validation check. I checked the MARC table and looked for the material and plant combination. The material passed this validation. After I received the error message I checked MARD and still found the material there. In both the MARC and MARD table the material appears with the plant, even at the specified storage location.
So now I am a bit confused on what the issue would be. It may be unrelated but I checked the EORD to see if any source lists existed for the plant/material combination, and there was none. Does anyone have an idea of what the issue could be? Are source lists related to creating physical inventory documents?
Thank you for any help you can provide,
Regards,
C

Hey Everyone,
I made a mistake while passing information. I needed to include a conversion exit when passing the Material number. I was not aware the BAPI did not do a conversion.
Regards,
C

Performance Issue with RF Scanners after SAP Enhancement Pack 5 Upgrade

We are on component version SAP ECC 6.0, and recently upgraded to Enhancement Pack 5. I believe we are on Net Weaver 7.10, and using RF scanners in one plant that is Warehouse Managed. Evidentially when we moved to EHP5, the Web SAP Console went away and we are left with ITS Mobile. This has created several issues and continues to be a performance barrier for the forklift drivers in the warehouse. We see there is a high use of java script, and the processors canu2019t handle this. When we login to tcode LM00, on a laptop or desktop computer, there are no performance issues. When we login to tcode LM00, with the RF scanners, the system is very slow. It might take 30 seconds to confirm one item on a WM Transfer Order.
1.) Can we revert back to Web SAP Console, after we have upgraded to EHP5?
2.) What is creating the performance issues with the RF Scanners now that we switched over to SAP ITS mobile?
Our RF Scanners are made by Intermec, but I donu2019t think that is where the solution lies. One person in our IT Operations has spent a good deal of time configuring SAPITS to get it to work, but still it isnu2019t performing.

Tom,
I am sorry I did not see this earlier.
I'm currently working on a very similar project with ITS mobile and the problem is to accurately determine the root cause of the problem in the least amount of time. The tool that works is found here: http://www.connectrf.com/index.php/mcm/managed-diagnostics/
Isolating the network from the application and the device is a time consuming process unless you have a piece of software that can trace the HTTP transaction between host and device on both wired and wireless side of the network. Once that is achieved (as with Connect's tool) you can then you can begin to solve the problem.
What I found in my project is that the amount of data traffic generated by ITS mobile can be reduced drastically, which speeds the response time of the mobile devices, especially with large number of devices in distribution centers.
Let me know if I can answer more questions related to this topic.
Cheers,
Shari

Issues with Creative Cloud for teams deployment workflow

The Adobe Creative Cloud for teams IT Deployment Guide lists out steps for IT admins to deploy the CS6 applications and then have their end-users license the trial software with their Adobe IDs once they have been invited to the team. There are two major issues with this document.
First, the media that is on the FTP is not for North American English. We are working to get that posted on the FTP site ASAP. In the meantime, you can find the CS6 MC media from: http://www.adobe.com/downloads/
[Note: Getting media from that page requires the use of the Adobe Download Assistant which is very consumer focused. Sorry about that.]
Second, in order to have the ability to login properly with a Creative Cloud for Teams account the system needs to have the latest copy of Adobe Application Manager installed. If you do not do this step the end user will be prompted for a serial number.
Unfortunately the Adobe Application Manager can’t be packaged with AAMEE nor is it a native installer. I know, I know! Here are the links to the Adobe Application Manager installers:
Windows: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=4773
Mac: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=4774
It can be installed from command line by:
Win: <Path to Setup.exe>Set-up.exe –mode=silent –action=install
Mac: <path to ASU> /ASU/Install.app/Contents/MacOS/Install –mode=silent –action=install
Jody Rodgers | Sr. Product Manager | Creative Cloud for Enterprise | Adobe Systems

Hi Boncker,
I see that you have an active Subscription under your account . Please launch any of the installed product and when you get the trial prompt , please click on License this software and then Enter the Adobe Id & Password for the account that you have accepted the invite .
Please do let us know if that worked for you or not .
Cheers,
Kartikay Sharma

Issue with plant in IL

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for