Issue with 'Ship To' in Sales A/R docs

Hi
By default, a new Sales document populates the Ship-To field with the default Ship-To address from BP Masterdata.
Street
ZIP City
(formatted according address setting in Setup / BP / Adressformats)
How could that be changed?
I need it like:
Company Name
Street
ZIP City
The reason: The contents of the Ship-To is printed on the documents whenever it is different from the Bill-To. It happens, that the Ship-To has to be changed for a Sales-Order / Delivery manually, but a 'one-time' only, so it doesnt belong into the BP masterdata. However, this would not work either, because there is not data field for a company name in the address section.
So, I would like to tell B1 to populate the Ship-To with the Street and ZIP/City as well as with Company Name.
Altering the above mentioned setting in setup is not a solution because it changes the address format for all of B1.
Thanks
Franz

Hi Franz,
An easy solution is put company name as the Ship to name. Then you just need this field to print.
Thanks,
Gordon

Similar Messages

Issue with Formatted Search and Sales BOM

Good afternoon,
One of our customers uses a Formatted Search on the Sales Order row to lookup the Project Code stored against the Item.
This works very well, except for when a Sales BOM is selected. I assume the FS lookup is working correctly, but the screen is quickly refreshed to list all the component items related to the BOM. This process appears to overwrite the contents of the Project field.
We wish to keep this functionality, but retain the FS lookup results in the Project column. Could the order of the process be changed so that the BOM refresh occurs prior to the FS lookup.
Thanks
Greig
Edited by: Greig Burrows on Jul 21, 2010 5:57 PM

Hi,
For metadata, which metadata are you not seeing? Are they custom properties within the PDF, and have you checked if you have crawled properties matching these?
I know there's issue with last modified on PDF's (http://sharepointfieldnotes.blogspot.no/2013/05/understanding-and-getting-sharepoint.html)
Thanks,
Mikael Svenson
Search Enthusiast - SharePoint MVP/MCT/MCPD - If you find an answer useful, please up-vote it.
http://techmikael.blogspot.com/
Author of Working with FAST Search Server 2010 for SharePoint

Issue with Delivery Grouping in Sales Order

Hello Gurus,
I have a problem in Sales Order (VA01 & VA02). The issue is as follows.
We have created a material called FREIGHT to calculate the Shipping & Handling cost in a Sales Order. This material has no ATP CHECK, so the Material Av. Date (MAD) is determined as immediate or the current date.
But the business process we want to implement is, the FREIGHT material should not be delivered separately, but should be grouped with one the line items in the sales order which has the earliest material available date and copy the corresponding dates to FREIGHT line item and delivery grouping should be done.
1. Say 1st line item is a BOM Material, next item is a standalone material (Non-BOM), and 3rd item is FREIGHT material.
POSNR   Matnr           Qty     DlvGrp DlvDt MAD LoadingDt
10     BOM (Parent)     1    1   x-date   09/11/2006    x-date
11     SKU1 (Child)     x        x-date   09/11/2006    x-date
12     SKU2 (Child)     x        x-date   09/11/2006    x-date
20     Non BOM    1     2        x-date   09/06/2006    x-date
30     FREIGHT      1      2        x-date   09/06/2006    x-date
I know the above example may not be that clear, but this is the space available when you post your topic.
Based on the above example, the earliest material available date is for Line item 20 i.e. 09/06/2006 and assume FREIGHT is also tied to the above line item (20) i.e. line item 20 & 30 are delivery grouped.
Say if I delete line item 20, now FREIGHT should be tied to line item 10 and delivery grouping should also take place get changed to 1 for FREIGHT item.
I need to achieve this using user-exits, but HOW?
Appreciate your views and the solution for the scenario.
Thanks.
Regards,
Suresh Ganti

Hi Suresh,
I guess you can accomplish this using SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE in MV45AFZZ. In table xvbap you will find all order items with an update indicator. If an item has indicator 'D' (deleted) and field GRKOR (delivery group) filled you should find the corresponding FREIGHT line having the same value for GRKOR. Then find the remaining non-FREIGHT item with the earliest material availability date and set the value of GRKOR for this item to the same value as the FREIGHT item.
Regards,
John.

Issue with Ship Confirm

Hi,
I have created a Sales Order in Oracle Apps R12, booked the sales order and also done the pick release and ship confirm and status of sales order in shipping transaction form is "Staged/Pick Confirm".
Now I am trying to do the ship confirm, I have entered the shipped quantity, Actions -> Ship Confirm and clicking on OK. Getting the warning pop up message and after clicking on OK button, Requests submitted Bill of Lading, Packing Slip Report and Commercial Invoice. but still the status of line in shipping transactions form is "Staged/Pick Confirm".
Could you please tell me how can we do it ship confirmed.
Thanks in Advance.
Manasa.

The items on the order are reservable or non reservable? IF non reservable did you mention the Sub inv, locator and lot during ship confirm ?
Also check how the ship options when you are ship confirming (by rule or ship options). To know what each flag indicates look for warehouse shipping execution guide.

Issue with qty confirmation in sales order

Dear All,
Earlier when i used to create the sales order and even if i confirm 1 qty also, i was able to deliver the entire qty mentioned in the sales order. But now. I am unable to do it.
System is asking me to confirm the entire qty mentioned in the sales order. Unless i do it system is not allowing me to do the delivery.
Pls help

Hai,
In the particular customer master,
Check
Sales area data
Partial delivery per item (Entry blank) Partial delivery allowed
Then try new sales order.
Regards,
Mani

Post Goods Issue - Tracing backward to update Sales Order & Delivery Docs

I have a requirement as follows. I need to do a Sales Document change and a delivery document change prior to goods Issue being done. The situation is to prevent SAP's normal back order processing from kicking off. I am quite confused about which method to use to achieve this. Wether BAPI &/or BDC &/or User Exit ???
Please help you will be rewarded with points....

Hello Srinivas
The business requires that like order line items be consolidated to one line item prior to the order going to the warehouse for picking. this will aid in picking at the warehouse as well as result in the customer invoice not reflecting more than one line item for the same material. In the case where the customer has truly ordered more than a case, i.e. 1 case 2 eaches. The documents in SAP should still reflect 2 line items.
The business also states that there be a 1 to 1 relationship between sales order and delv note. This means any unconfirmed line items must be closed out after del. note is created for the sales order. The closing out of the sales order will stop SAP from automatically creating a backorder once the unconfirmed line items become available in inventory.
The business also requires that all partial line items in the delv. due to stock not available at the time of picking (those line items need to be updated) with the pick qty. And the line items which were not picked need to be automatically cancelled out. In addition the order line item must be rejected with a reason code for the line item which were not picked.
We have a daily IDOC interface which creates shipments and updates delivery qty.
I hope that clarifies the business. Pls let me know.
Regards

Issues with loads

There has been issues with loads to a Sales cube. The issue is that delta loads for the first few days in January have been lost (also deleted from PSA). I wanted to check the following before I make a suggestion:
1. Data up until the end of last year is available and okay
2. Create a copy of the original Sales cube
3. Generate a DataSource from the original cube
4. Load up until the end of last year to the new cube via the Datamart
5. Load from Sales LO extractors, carrying out the init from the beginning of this year to 9999 into the new copy
6. Load Deltas into the new copy
Thanks

Hi,
I hope You had taken no restriction on the date when you were doing delta init.thats why you are getting delta for all records.It would continue in futue also.
We can easily find out the sales document number which was created somewhere in December ending( Iam not saying the document should be last document of the December). Use that documetn number to fil the setup table as starting document number.
Now do selective deletion of the data from the cube which has Calnder day >= 01.01.2007. Now Do repair request with selection on calender day(or the field which is used to map to Calnder day) with the range 01.01.2007,12.12.9999 .
Next time when you are doing delta load to the cube, it will bring the records as nothng was happend.
Ofcourse as Roberto mentioned ,it is possible only in a specific case: if you are sure that a every sales document created before 31/12/06 cannot change anymore after that date !
What ever the date you feel comfotable (i.e you feel that the records which were created before that date were not changed in after Jan 01) instead of 01.01.2007 in the above explanations.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P
Message was edited by:
Anil Kumar Sharma

Problem in Partial Billing for Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification

Hello Guys,
There is one issue related to a scenario of Third party Sales with shipping notification. Here the basic process that runs
are : Sales order --- > PR -- > PO --> MIGO --> Billing document --> Vendor Invoice Verification.
In this specific scenario, partial billing is not happening and the billing relevance for item category "B" and in copying control data
from sales order to billing doccument, the biling quantity field is "A".
Could anyone throw some light on the configuration part so that partial invoicing can happen ??? Please make a note of the fact
that billing documents are generated after MIGO is done.
Regards,
Sarthak

Finally resolved

Issue with the shipping calender

Hi all
I couldn't solve one issue regarding the planning calender
Our company has a three day delivery period from the customer order date unitll the requested due delivery date
tha Factory calender has 5 days from Monday untill Friday as working days
with shifts from 00:00:00 to 03:00:00 & 03:00:00 to 24:00:00
and the shipping calender has 7 days with the time frame 00:00:00 to 03:00:00
When a sales orders are created for the saturday,sunday and monday
the purchase requisition for sunday and monday are pushed to tuesdays and the purchase requisition for saturday order is on the same day itself
I have to set the calenders in such a way that for saturday sunday I should be getting Prqs on Friday and planned orders on monday and friday as there is no production on saturday and sunday
I have tried various ways by extending the shipping calender on friday till 24:00:00
but I'm not getting the required output
Could you guide me thru the checks to be performed to solve this issue
Thanks
Maanav

Hi digambar
thanks for replying
The whole process is a three day process
When a customer orders the product it will be shipped in three days
Let's say a customer orders on monday 06/18 with a due delivery date on
next week thursday 06/28 then the planned order will be created on tuesday 06/26 and the purchase Requisition on wednesday 06/27 and the wave pick will be on Tuesday 06/26 and the product is shipped to customer on thursday
Accordingly the configuration was made with shipping calender from 0:00 to 3:00
on 5 days from monday till friday(the order which comes under 3 am window will be delivered acc to the scenario explained above)
and the production calender in shifts from 0:00 to 3:00 am and 3:10 to 0:24 hrs
But for the sunday and monday (delivery due dates) the orders purchase reks are being pushed to monday and tuesday , instead of behind promised on friday(before week), as there's no production on sunday and saturday and the Purchase reks and pld order should be created on friday itself (that's how the configuration is)
So I changed the shipping calender periods into shifts on friday (0:00 to 3:00, 3.00 to 24:00) even then there is no change in the pushed orders to monday
I only have this problem for sunday and monday orders
I'm not sure about how the purchase requisitions are created? Could you tell me how to check that? and what else I have to check for this probelm
the planning system is APO
I really appreciate your response
maanav

Cannot do MIGO in Third Party Sales Process with shipping notification

In the Third party sales process with Shipping notification,the item category for the material is TAS (Billing relevance=R),item category group is BANS.
Intially sales order is created,then using me21n with reference to purchase requisation purchase order is created,then in MIGO stage i used the PO No there but i get the message no item found in PO.
what adjustment have to be done in order to do MIGO

Refer following SDN thread, by that you will be able to get overview on best practices about Third Party Sales & necessary configuration you need to follow for statistical GR:
- Third party direct shipment (II)
Further maintain Billing Relevance for Item Category as G - Order-related billing of the delivery quantity.
Regards
JP

Issue with sales order stock that is referencing a non-existing sales order

We have an issue with sale order stock.
Due to user error we have ended up with a negative quant of sales order stock in a bin. Further the error was due to mis-keying of sales order number. Hence this negative quant is referencing a sales order that does not exist.
We need to get rid of this quant.
I thought of cycling this quant off as a solution. And hence replicated the scenario in the test system. I was able to create a TO to cycle it off but cannot clear the differences from 999 . The error I get while trying to do this is "SD document not in database or has been archived" . This error is true since the sales order actually does not exist. So cycling it off did not work.
Can anyone suggest how we can get rid of this negative quant of sales order stock ?
Thanks

Hi,
You said that your user mistyped the SO number and it resulted in a -quant. In which transaction was it possible? If I give a non existing no. SAP doesn't allow me to book.
If I were you I would check both in WM & IM what the user had done...step-by-step...
Negative quant comes to existance in interim storage type if we book e.g. a GI. It should have started in IM...how was your user be able to do that??? If it was possible cannot you reverse the IM booking?
(...if all else fails...cannot you create a SO document with external number assignment with the same number?...)
BR
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jun 24, 2008 8:31 PM

Issue with Sales office values in BI

Hi Team,
We have a issue with the sales office values in a BI report.
The report displays 7 sales office values for the division 01. Where as in ECC, we have only 6 sales office values exists for the same division 01.
These sales office 7 has been have been loaded on april n may months.
The master data has all the sales office values 01- 10.
Those sales office values are coming from the Infocubes, 'Billing Document Condition' & 'Open Orders'.
I have the checked the Multiprovider, Infocubes and the InfoObject and values exists.
How to proceed further and correct these values?
Appreciate your expert guidance...
Thanks
Regards
Santhosh Kumar N

Hi Krishna,
Thanks for the reply. The Sales office field is directly mapped in the transformation and does not have any routine. Its the Key field.
The Billing Document Condition infocube is being feed by the DSO '2LIS_13_VDKON - Billing Document Condn' and datasource is '2LIS_13_VDKON'.
The Open Orders infocube is being feed by the DSO Document Order item / Delivery; below which we have another 3 DSO.
1st DSO has the Datasource '2LIS_13_VDITM'
2nd DSO has the Datasource '2LIS_11_VAITM'
3rd DSO has the Datasource '2LIS_11_V_SSL'
The Sales Office 7 has txn records for the month of April & May.
The report built on top of a Multiprovider and the for the months June and July, we have txn records fine for the sales office 01 - 06.
Please help me, if i am missing anything here and make me to understand better.

ERP Sales Order : Performance issues with Product Proposal

Hi
we are working on CRM 2007 solution and are facing serious performance issues with the ERP Sales Order functionality provided in the ICWC of this version.
In our development we are adding items in the ERP cart as soon as the user clicks on the 'New Sales Order' button of the sales order sreen. We get the items by very simple and optimized call to the ERP system and then add these entities in the Item Cart (Item collection ...in simple sense).
For adding 10 items the application takes 10 seconds and this is too much for adding just 10 items.
Can you please provide any Notes/alternative solution to resolve this issue.
Regards
Ajitabh

Hi Ajithabh,
Please apply the following SAP notes:
1061423 - Interaction Center ERP Order Performance improvement
1262277 - Performance: CRM value help causes dumps in ERP
1292817 - Performance: Reduce RFC calls during creation of ERP order.
1319885 - ERP sales order search with external reference
1326527 - Reducing number of RFC calls in IC ERP Sales Order
I hope it helps!
Regards,
Gabriel Santana

Issue With Sales Document Type in BW.

Dear Experts,
I am facing an Issue with Sales Document Type(Object name is 0DOC_TYPE).
when i am loading data from R/3 to BW It is converting Sales Document type as follow
Sales Document Type in R/3                         Sales Document Type in BW
OR                                                                        TA
CR                                                                        G2
DR                                                                        L2
I check with an ABAPer and he told that there is conversion exit for this Object so that's why it is converting when sending to BW. But the user wants to see in Report same as it is in R/3 like OR, CR DR ... etc.
I have done some investigation and found that the conversion exit (CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_INPUT and CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_OUTPUT) are converting the values based in the table TAUUM
The staructure of TAUUM is
MANDT(Client) SPRAS(Language) AUART(Sales document type (not converted)   AUART_SPR(Language key for sales document type)
and values are
100 E TA OR
100 E G2 CR
etc....
The same Conversion exits(CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_INPUT and CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_OUTPUT) and table TAUUM are available in BW as well. So i thought I can Use InfoObject 0DOC_TYPE by changing it's conversion Routine as AUART(which runs based on the above mentioned conversion exits).
but the the problem is table TAUUM(Pool Table) does't have any data in BW.
So can anyone tell me is there any option to load data into table TAUUM from R/3 or any other option to solve this issue.
Your ideas will really help's me.
Thanks in advance,
Dara.

Hi Venkat,
Thanks a lot for your immediate response.
The InfoObject 0DOC_TYPE was without conversion exit by default. but when data coming from R/3 it is converting and sending to BW So that's why i am planning to use conversion exit "AUART" in the info Object.
I checked data in R/3 using RSA3 it is showing sales document type as "OR" and for the same transaction data when i checked in PSA it is showing as "TA".
Could you please let me know if there any other options.
Thanks in advance,
Dara.

Delivery in third party sales order with shipping notification.

Hello Gurus
Goodevening every body,
Its one our requirement , we wants to deliever good from third party storage location by using third party scenario with shipping notificcation but as per my knowledge there is no delivery from sales side ? (VL01N) .
Note->I know only this process in that scenario ( Third party wih shipping notification) -> OR -> PR-> P0->MIGO-> MIRO->VF01 but he wants the delivery to happen in this process (VL01N) after MIGO is it possible to do that in third party with shipping notification?
Thank you inadvance
Regards
Ravi.M

Check this Building Block
[Third Party with Shipping Notification|http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/html/J54_EN_AT.htm]
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Issue with 'Ship To' in Sales A/R docs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for