Issues during F110 - Payment of invoice posted last year

Hi gurus,
Last month we had some problems during the payment of several invoices because they have been posted last year. When the user is trying to pay it, the system shows the following message: u201CFI234 u2013 Different FM fiscal years: Invoice XXXX for paymentu201D
To solve this problem we run two transactions, FMJ2 (Year-End Closing: Carryforward of Open Items), to carry open items from 2011 to 2012 and the transaction FMAVCREINIT (Re-Initialize Availability Control Ledgers (FM), to reinitialize the ledgers.
With this procedure we solve the problem for several invoices, but, for some reason, some invoices remain with this problem even though doesnu2019t exist open item last year (2011) anymore.
Does anyone know if is there any step during carry forwarding open items that weu2019re skipping to solve this kind of issue?
Best Regards,
Amorim, Rodrigo

HI
you need to apply follwoing note
Note 411323 - Profile 500: Payment for previous-year invoice
Note 533106 - RFFMS200: Error message of FI234
Note 535525 - RFFMS200: Error message FI234 (2)
It will resolves your issue
Reg
Vishnu

Similar Messages

Reversing a Invoice document posted last year

Hi Gurus,
Our client has posted a Invoice document last year end and then closed the year.
The Funds management is active so the Corresponding WBS and Cost center is updated.
Now the user got the payments in 3 different docs where the user do not wan to do partial payments as the WBS and Cost center will not be picked up.
How can we break the vendor posting into 3 postings and reverse the posted doc.
Regards
Lakshmi

Hi Lakshmi,
It's not allowed to reverse invoice posting for last year.
You can create a Return PO with ME21N or do a FI posting.
Best Regards,
Owen

Match po invoice to last years recieps

Hi gurus,
I have a spec to match all po invoice to last years reciepts with evidence of invoice price variance.input parameter is "year" against which the "gl_date" of invoices will be checked.
How do i go about it?

Matching is neither a choice nor a subject to consider pros/cons, rather in real world it can be consider as part of payable invoice validation, which internally driven by couple of factors :
1. how Invoice validation/approval is set
2. what PO process is tighten with Invoicing
3. how receiving is linked with PO and Invoices
The 2 way, 3 way and 4 way what we know as part matching process, is drived by above mention factor. Each industry has there known set of process.
The most acceptable is 3 way rather in some specfic case like Healthcare or other similar kind of industry might consider receiving verification that mean 4 way.

Match po invoice to last years reciepts

Hi gurus,
I have a spec to match all po invoice to last years reciepts with evidence of invoice price variance.input parameter is "year" against which the "gl_date" of invoices will be checked.
How do i go about it?

Matching is neither a choice nor a subject to consider pros/cons, rather in real world it can be consider as part of payable invoice validation, which internally driven by couple of factors :
1. how Invoice validation/approval is set
2. what PO process is tighten with Invoicing
3. how receiving is linked with PO and Invoices
The 2 way, 3 way and 4 way what we know as part matching process, is drived by above mention factor. Each industry has there known set of process.
The most acceptable is 3 way rather in some specfic case like Healthcare or other similar kind of industry might consider receiving verification that mean 4 way.

System shut down during F110 payment run

During the F110 payment run, the PRD system shut down. There were 259 items in the proposal and according to the status 42 posting orders were generated and completed. What is the process to handle this problem? Can the payment run be re-started?
It appears that clearing documents were created for some open items before the system shut down but no checks are showing in the check register. Has this happened to anyone before and what steps should be taken to resolve this?

Is it a matter of...
1. deleting the output of the payment run,
2. deleting the proposal
3. canceling the the payment check by check using FCH8 if any occurred
4. reseting and reversing the clearing documents created using FBRA before the system shut down
5. start a new payment run

Issue during F110

Hi SAP Friends,
During F110 in Printout/data medium there are already 2 program (RFFOAVIS & RFFOEDI1) what is the use of this programs.
Also for PMW what is the program that i will have to select ???
Regards.
Edited by: Gabriel Borde on Oct 7, 2011 9:27 AM

Dear Gabriel,
For the Payment Methods assing print program as RFFOEDI1 (check or demanddraft)
RFFouAVIS for : print out the payment advice
Regards
shankar

KI235 Error Message During F110 Payment Run.

Dear Gurus,
When we run transaction automatic payments F110, we get the message that our gain / loss in exchange rate account requires assignment to CO object. Error message "KI235".
I did search on google and all forums, but am unable to find an answer.
We are using New GL, and it's a requirement to split the foreign exchange to different cost centers. Because of this, we are not able to fix it to one cost center, but to let the system determine the cost center via OKB9 from the Profit center used.
OKB9 has been set up properly with respective Profit Centers mapped to Cost Centers. However, during payment run, whenever there are multiple profit centers involved, system aren't able to derive cost center. We have no issue when document has only on Profit Center.
Can anyone help me in this issue?
Thanks.
Regards

Foreign exchange gain loss account is a P&L account which will ask for a cost center/object if this acount is created as a cost element n your system. There are two options.
1. Don't create Forex gain/loss account account as a cost element. If you do this this account will never ask for a cost object.
2. If this account is already created as a cost element then you need to default the cost center for this GL Account in OKB9.
I hope this should work.

Issue during F110 for Vendor

Dear SAP Experts,
There is Vendor which is for WTH Tax. There is vendor posting of 1000 Cr and Dr XYX Account of 900 and Dr 100 of WTH Tax. Now when i go to FBL1N i see 900 as outstanding for Vendor but when i do F110 for the vendor i the proposal i see 1000 amount and when i double click it, the amount is 900.
Kindly advice.

Hi,
As per your entry if you see in FBL1N it will display vendor line items only so it is showing as 900.
While in F110 the system will take the invoice amount for display, but it pay only line item amount 900 thats why it is showing as 1000 but if you double click on it will show the actual vendor line item amount only.
BR,
Satya

F110 payment for invoice not more than USD 25000

Is there a way to set up the system for F110 so that the payment per vendor cannot be more than USD 25000. Any amount above it has to be paid via approval.

Hi both,
There is some standard configuration indeed. In trans. FBZP, choose "Payment methods in company code" and you will see a field "Maximum amount" (T042E-BISBT). If you set it to 25000 USD in all relevant payment methods then the payment program (trans. F110) will put the vendor payment to exceptions (with error FZ618 - Payment amount is not within the limits allowed) if the payment amount exceeds this limit. I have just tested in sandbox and it works like this:
- it does not look at single item amounts, but at the total to be paid together in one REGUH line (e.g. if you have one invoice for 11000 USD and one for 15000 USD, then both will be blocked if they fall in the same payment proposal)
- early payment discounts are deducted (e.g., if you have an invoice for 25500 USD with a 3 % discount (24735 USD net) and nothing else then it will be paid)
- however, if the payments are split (e.g., after ticking "Individual payment" LFB1-XPORE in vendor master), then it considers each invoice separately, even if their total exceeds the limit
- SAP help says that if you enter the payment method directly into the item (rather than choosing it from vendor master), then the limit is not taken into account.
So, from the above you can see that it is not a complete protection (there are loopholes and back doors) but it is the most simple - and standard - thing you can do.
Would this help? If not, then a user exit would be a solution.

How to restrict vendor open items to be picked to 45 during F110 process

Hi experts,
My client want to restrict vendor open items to be picked to 45 max during F110 payment run for each vendor.
For example: If vendor " xyz" is having 60 open items at the time of payment run, it should allow max to pick only 45 open items and generate one clearing document during payment run F110.
Kindly give me any suggestions weather it is possible or not.
Thanks & regards,
Raghul

hi ,
Thanks for your quick reply.
Actually we are using only payment method C- check.
We have developed ZFORM and ZPROGRAM by copying standard form F110_PRENUM_CHCK and std prog RFFOUS_C.
In My ZFORM only single page is there with invoice details in main window ( upper side ) and check in the below page.
when i had taken print on pre printed stationary sample i came to know in main window at maximum 45 items details can be dispalyed in first page with total amt check in below for each vendor.
Its works fine if each vendor has open items below 45 during payment run.
If any of the vendor is having more than 45 open items then 2 pages are printing.
For ex: if vendor having 60 open items.
For Ex : In first page 45 invoices details with say total invoice amt 30,000 is printing check with same amt.
in second page remaining 15 invoices with say total invoice amt of this 15 inovices is 5000 amt is printing check with 35,000 Instead of 5,000.
We are not using void check concept here as my client dont want to waste checks.
thansk & regards,
Raghul.

F110 : program name of posting cleared document during F110

Dear all,
I need to figure out the "PAYMENT DOCUMENT SPLITTING" issue after F110 via debugging.
I believe the main program for F110 is SAPF110V and SAPF110S is the program handle the posting. However, after I put the break point in SUBMIT SAPF110S AND RETURN in SAPF110V, then do step by step debug. Debugging doesn't go to SAPF110S. I am not sure what's wrong.
Can anyone tell me the program name that post cleared document during F110 processing?
Thank you very much for help in advance!!
Molly
Edited by: Molly Li on Jan 26, 2008 2:41 PM

Hi Sruthy
I guess you have missed populating field STYPE in each of the records which identifies the actual structure.
Below is how you have to pass for them:
<b>Struc --> Value
BGR00 --> 0
BBKPF --> 1
BBSEG --> 2</b>
Kind Regards
Eswar

ISSUE: TDS REVERSAL DURING ADVANCE CLEARING WITH INVOICE

Dear All
I am having problem related to TDS reversal.
For e.g
Advance payment to Vendor: rs 10000/
Tds deducted is rs 200/
Now Invoice posted for amount is: 100000/
Tds deductes is rs 1000/
We know that TDS on rs 10000 is deducted twice which is generally reversed during advance clearing with invoice through F-54. But when I am clearing Ad. with Invoice, no TDS is getting reversed.
Please help me on this issue or is there any other way of doing this process.
points will be awarded
Thanks in advance
sandeep panwar

Hi
run the program RWTF010 in SE38
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Incorrect Cash Discount info was called during the Invoice Posting in FB01

Hi,
I'm having an issue where when I post the Invoice via FB01 using a non-default payment term for a specific supplier, FB01 seems to be replacing the Cash Discount information base on the supplier default payment term. I have tried to debug and suspect it was due to the FM# FI_CHANGE_PAYMENT_CONDITIONS.
It happens whenever there is a payment method insert in the FB01 transaction during the invoice posting. If the payment method was left blank, there will be no issue on the cash discount.
I saw that there is a fix from SAP for OSS Note 1314271 - Discount days not adjusted after changing Payment term. This fix added a new statement into the FM# shown as bold at the statement below:
    IF i_newsklin NE i_oldsklin OR i_zbdreq = char_x
         OR I_OLDZLSCH NE I_ZLSCH.                                "Note1314271
                      CONCATENATE 'S' status INTO status.
    ENDIF.
In layman term, below will be the summary of the coding above:
IF NewCashDiscount NE OldCashDiscount OR TermOfInstallmentPayment = u2018Xu2019
     OR OldPaymentMethod NE NewPaymentMethod
      CONCATENATE 'S' status INTO status. (No idea what is this statement trying to achieve)
ENDIF
Kindly share with me if you have experienced this before.
Your advice is very much appreciated.
Thanks,
David
Edited by: DAVID LIM on May 20, 2010 4:46 AM

Hi Shashi
Cash Discount amount can be modified manually?
Go to the 'Cash Discount' Tab and type the correct discount. The difference may be a result of rounding differences.
Hope this is useful!
Thanks & Regards
Fede

Assignment Field Get Cleared(blank) During Automatic Payment Run(F110)

Hi all,
We have a senario that during the creation of AP invoice, the Profit Center is entered in Assignment field ( BSEG-ZUONR) in FB01.In the invoice document the assignment field value correctly copied into Profit center (BSEG-PRCTR) based on a subsititution rule.
But during the payment document run (F110) the assignment field is get cleared (Blank).and in REGUP table, the Assignment field get populated correctly.
By displaying the payment document using transaction code FB03, the assingment fields is empty.ie field BSEG-ZUONR is empty. .
We have checked all the subsititution rules defined in the system and none of these causing the problem. We suspect there are some hidden subsititution or configurations in SAP that affect the assignment. We also checked the sort key is not the cause of it.
Have anyone encounter the same scenario why the Assignment field get cleared(blank) in Payment document. Please kindly share.
Regards
Riaz

Hi,
I think you are trying to Run Automatic Payment Programme with Check Management and you want to Print check and payment summary.
Kindly check if you have defined SAP Scripts in FBZP Payment Method in Company Code.Select a Co Code and double click on payment method eg C-Cheque, their is a section called FORM DATA you need to input Scripts for the same so that the Payment Programme prints output as defined in the SAP Script for Checks and payment advice
Regards
Rahul

Due date payment restriction during manual payment posting

Hi Team.
We have a requirement to pay bills only after the due date is over,and not before that.
For Ex :- If i have payment terms of 30 days and i am booking invoice on 1st of mar then due date would be 31st of mar.
our requirement is to pay this bill only on or after this 31st march.user should not allowed to post any payment entry before 31st march.
Can some one please give the settings required for achieving this requirement during manual payment entry..
appreciate your help..
Thanks
Vinai

Hi Vinai,
Sorry for giving confusion..It is as simple as below.
1). Manual payment should happen only after the invoice is due....and that too for only one vendor.rest of all vendors should be able to pay as usual before due dates. so we are creating one new payment term for particular vendor and trying to restrict the payment by creating validation.
2). And this restriction should also apply when vendor is configured as customer.
For Ex :- If vendor invoice value is 10,000 where i need to pay, and he is also a customer and has sale value 1000 which i need to receive.
net balance is 9000.
during this vendor & customer clearance also the due date calculation should work.
Please help in building validation logic or any BADI , EXIT' s at lease for first one..
Thanks
Vinai

Issues during F110 - Payment of invoice posted last year

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for