Issues regarding export scenario

Hi,
1.I have exported the material ARE1 is updated . But the material is returned from custom . In this scenario how can I receive the product in domestic market.
2.I am doing export but by mistake I have not exported the product after 180 days. What will I do in SAP system after 180 days. Whether I have to pay the interest or any thing else.
3. Stock transfer from manufacturing plant to SEZ plant , How can I inventorize excise duty in this scenario.
Regards
Prashant

First of all, please dont ask too many questions in one thread. Secondly, on your first two questions, I dont think it is a real time scenario and hence, I refrain myself in giving suggestions to those.
For third question, please search the forum or Google it so that you will get lot of inputs from there. Take the inputs and try on your own.
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

SSRS 2012 Conditional Formatting Color Issues When Exporting to Excel

Hi all,
We recently upgraded to SQL 2012 from SQL2008 R2. I'm having a strange issue with SSRS2012.
One of the report has conditional formattings on cell background colors. Everything works fine when render the report in browser or preview mode. However, the conditional formatting stop working when export the report to Excel (no issues if
export to pdf). All cells are high-lightened with pre-defined color although it should only high-lighten those cells that fulfil the condition.
Has someone encountered this issue before ? Thanks for any help.

Hi ZZ02,
I have test the scenario in my testing environment, however, everything goes well when exporting to Excel format. The issue might be related to the expression for the conditional background color. To make further analysis, please post the expression as well
as the report design structure.
Additionally, in SQL Server 2012 Reporting Services, the Excel rendering extension renders a report to the native format of Microsoft Excel 2007-2010, the format of which is ExcelOpenXML. By default, the previous version of the Excel rendering extension,
compatible with Microsoft Excel 2003, is disabled. At this time, I suggest that you enable the Excel 2003 rendering extension by modifying the RSReportServer.config file. After that, the Excel 2003 rendering format will be available on report manager (not
available in Report Designer). So, please export the report from report manager and check the result again.
For more information about enable the Excel 2003 rendering extension, please see:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/sqlreportingservices/thread/0713de27-dcc0-4e51-81ac-5272647d171f
Regards,
Mike Yin
TechNet Subscriber Support
If you are
TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback
here.
Mike Yin
TechNet Community Support

Re-Export Scenario in India

Hi,
Just need your inputs on the above scenario, pls find details below:
Scenario goes like this:
1.Received goods from Vendor, Customs duty is paid for Import.
2.Found Faulty, need to return to vendor.
3.In India, eventhough it is faulty items for export we need to pay excise and cess. Pls note that additional customs duty paid should be reversed in this flow.
4.We need to follow the sales flow instead of return PO, returns delivery etc.,due to some number range issues specific to India.
Kindly Suggest me how this Re export scenario can be handled thru' sales flow
Best Regards,
Vaidheeswaran.A

1. Create the Vendor as a Customer.
2. Follow the Normal Export Sales Process.
3. In India, CIN can be configured as with payment of duty or without payment of duty. If ARE1 is con confirmed & closed in the specified period, only then Excise Duty is liable.
Export Sale Scenario:
http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/500/html/J91_ExportSaleundBond_EN_IN.htm
Regards,
Rajesh Banka
Reward points if helpful.

Single invoice for multiple deliveries in Export scenario

Hi All
I am trying to create a single invoice for multiple deliveries. In case of Local Sales i am able to do it.
But when it comes to export sales the system is not allowing me to create Single invoice for 2 deliveries . This is a export scenario. Can you suggest... When i am checking the split invoice log it says split due to header data "Number of foreign trade data i"
Plz suggest.
Thanks
Rishi

Thanks G. Lakshmipathi
Resolved
As per the split analysis, System was checking the number generated for Foreign Trade data at delivery level.
As told i have Tried maintaining the Indication at copy control level VTFL "Redetermination of Foreign Trade Data at Billing level".
This has resolved my Issue.
Thanks Again
Rishi

Issue regarding consecutive run for an Interface

hi all,
i have an issue regarding an interface
if this Interface is a initial run for the file, you have to populate all the data of the people. That is , unlike other interfaces where we send only the latest record, in this interface we need to send all the records of the employees. in a employee has 10 records with different dates, we will pick up all the records greater than 1999 and pass it. whereas if there is a change in one field, then we will send all the record of that file. And If it is a consecutive run then you have to populate changes only. the following algorithm can help you in this
if intial_run EQ 'X'
transfer IT_FINALDATA to XI.
else
Declare a 2 more internal tables similar to IT_FINALDATA...for our below example let us assume that
         DATA: IT_CLUSTERDATA type standard table of IT_FINALDATA.
         DATA: IT_COMPAREDATA type standard table of IT_FINALDATA.
use the following statement to retrieve the data from cluster and comparing it
        IMPORT IT_CLUSTERDATA TO IT_COMPAREDATA FROM DATABASE indx(zn) ID 'IN_8085'.
        Compare IT_COMPAREDATA with IT_FINALDATA
If sy-subrc = 0.
Means there are no changes, and no output required
Else
Pass the data to XI interface, And store the internal table in the same INDX table, using the following statement
EXPORT IT_FINALDATA to IT_CLUSTERDATA FROM DATABASE indx(zn) ID 'IN_8077'.
Endif.
In this can we deliver the changed data at every single consecutive run.
Please let me know,
Thank Q
Rohini.

This is something where HR Interface Toolbox (PU12) can be very helpful, it will take care of changes from one run to another and you can configure it to send changes only in next run. But, you will need some ABAP in its user exits to restrict the data after 1999, and any other restrictions that you might want.

Export scenarios from XI and import them into PI

Dear experts
We are planning to upgrade our exitsting XI 3.0 to PI7.0.
Due to system requeriments, we need to install PI on new hardware and migrate all the existing scenario's from XI 3.0 PI7.'0
How to migrate the existing ABAP developements from XI to PI ?
It's possible to export scenarios from XI and import them into PI?
Thanks, in advance
Carme

Hi,
you should go to PI 7.1 and not PI 7.0 otherwise it makes not so much sense.
And yes it's possible to migrate your scenarios. If you have UDFs you have to check them because the java version has changed.
Regards
Patrick

Part 2: Flat files and Business Contents: Any issues with this scenario?

I will appreciate some clarification on the some points made in response to my previous post "Flat files and Business Contents: Any issues with this scenario?"
1.
" ...youd better analyze those cubes for data redundancy and presence of data youll never use. " I will appreciate some clarification on the type of analysis you are referring to. Examples will help.
2.
"If you want to combine several found IOs in your custom dataprovider, then again you must know (or figure out) relationships between these IOs." I will appreciate some clarification on the type of relationship you are referring to. Examples will help.
3.
I am a bit confused with "..include into ODS structure ALL fields required for the cube" but you also noted noted that "...except navigational attributes and chars and KFs that are going to be determined in TRs or URs."
If you exclude ALL these, haven't you excluded all the fields you included in the ODS structure?
4.
"Consider carefully the ODS key fields selection. Their combination should not allow data aggregation that you dont need."
I may be missing the point here, I understand that you need to select the fields which will form the unique ID for the records in the ODS under the Key Field (please correct me if I am wrong with the purpose of the Key Field), but I don't understand the discussion of "aggregation" in the context.
Thanks in advance

Hallo
I try to give some exaplanation based on the previous answer.
1. Data redundancy - make sure you do not store the same information. does not make sense to have data redundanty across you Data Warehouse. this is also a cost. just sotre the same information one time if you get all what you need.
2. whatwhever you build you dp, which consist of IO, you need to know with kind of relation (1:1 or 1:n - n:n and so on) exist between them. that will help you when you model you infoprovider. For example I would never pit togheter IO (n:m) in the same dimension if you expect an high number of cardinality. Sometime an IO can be an attribute of another one (depend on relation. For example
Business Partner and his Address. Usually you have a relation 1:1, in this case address is an attribute of BParten and store it in the Masterdata instead then DP
3. Sometime when you load from ODS to CUBE, you can fill some IO (which are in the infocube and not in the ODS)through ABAP routine in TR-Start Routine of Update Rule. Does not make sense to include these IO in the ODS as they are NULL or Blank (the deault value). This can happen when for example, you first load in the ODS (Price and Quantity) and then you calculate Sell price later (Price * Quantity). of course it could be doen also in the Bex. Depends on other factors (Performance - Loaidng -Sizing)
4. Make sure that the KEY definition of ODS is accordingly to the data otherwise you will aggregate the data and later maybe if you need the detail you miss it.
for example: customer - product - Distr Chan - Sell Price
if each Customer can buy each product for any Distrution Channel, then when you build your ODS(Customer - Product and Distribution must be KEY) otherwise (if you have only Customer - Product KEY for example) you will lose the details for Distribution Channel.
I hope eveyrhting is clear
Regards
Mike

Exports Scenario

Hi Guys,
Can somebody please tell me that where are Bonds and Licenses maintained and customized in an Export scenario..
Waiting for your reply at the earliest..
Thanks & Regards,
Gaurav

Dear Gaurav
Bonds and license masters will be maintained in indirect taxes.
Path for this is India localisation menu> indirect taxes> Master data > license master and Bond master.
For License master these are tcodes:
License Master
J1ILIC01     Capture
J1ILIC02     Change
J1ILIC03     Display
J1ILIC04     Cancel
J1ILIC05     Close
Bond master
J1IBN01     Create
J1IBN02     Change
J1IBN03     Display
J1IBN04     Cancel
J1IBN05     Close
Avinash Humbrey

One issue regarding PPDS OP.confirmation from Legal Non-SAP system

Dear Experts
we met a BAPI function issue regarding PPDS Operation.confirmation from Legal Non-SAP system.
scenario is as following:
we want to build the interface between PPDS and non-SAP system, regarding OP. and order confirmation inbound processing.
now we input simulated inbound date and test using BAPI: BAPI_MOSRVAPS_CONFOPRMULTI
but we find a problem, even we set different value for fields ‘ duration’ in function. after call BAPI, It didn't reflect the 'net duration' or 'remaining duration', these fields not changed through check in Tcode:/SAPAPO/RRP3 for single operation.
In the meanwhile , but it works for fields 'confirmed Yield' and fields 'confirmed Scrap' for single operation.
my questions is that: if we need to synchronize the operation confirmation( including confirmed yield,confirmation scrap, duration)，do we use the correct BAPI for this or do we need an additional BAPI, please hints.
Thanks a lot! any feedback would be welcome!
Best Regards
Kevin

Hi Kevin,
Yes you use the right BAPI.
you have to use table OPERATION_CONFIRMATION.
You cannot just set the duration. You have to trigger time event confirmations.
The field duration according to the documentation currently not supported.
You need to use CONFIRMATION_TYPE
0100 Start of Setup
0150 End of setup
0200 Start of processing
0300 Partially complete
0350 Complete
Not sure if all confirmation types are supported by the BAPI.
You can also set start and end time but not sure either whether it is supported or not.
Regards,
Uli

Issues with export with upgrade to 3.3

I am experiencing issues with export with 3.3
The image looks great in the Browser after editing. However when I checked the export folder I discovered corrupt files.
I only dicovered it because I tried to email one of the images.
2 out of 200 the blacks had solarized meaning all blacks went to white.
Never had this problem before in any of my Aperture Versions since day one.
The bottom line problem how can trust that the images are ok on export whitout having to look at every single export later.
This is embarissing since I had already delivered a project not knowing there were bad files.
Additionally images do not seem to be as sharp before the upgrade. I am using Nikon 300 and Nikon 7000 with San Disk Cards.
Do I have to do some camera profiling ?

Have you checked the Color Profile setting in the export preset you are using?
I found my Color Profile settings switched to different settings after the upgrade.
Try the Generic RGB profile.
Regards
Léonie

I am having an issue regarding a placed order via customer service department

I recently relocated to Anchorage Alaska as part of a permanent change of station per the United States Air Force. I was initially located on the East Coast in the lower 48 and at the time of activating my contract I had purchased two separate Iphone 4 devices. I also recently went in to a store in February to purchase a Nexus 7 as well.
Upon arrival in Anchorage I had multiple issues regarding the Iphone 4 devices including being unable to send and receive text messages & imessages, unable to make phone calls, dropped phone calls, unable to utilize GPS, as well as not being able to access general account information and use anything related to web browsing or data usage. It was determined that because the Iphone 4 operates on the 3g network and Verizon does not have a 3g network in Alaska, as a result I was utilizing an extended service network from another carrier. As a result of this I am only able to use my Iphone 4 devices while connected to my wi-fi network while within my home, which is totally unacceptable.
I was not made aware that I would be dealing with this when I moved to Alaska and inquired as the the use of the devices I currently owned prior to purchasing the tablet. I was assured by three separate store employees one of which being a manager that all devices would function at 100% efficiency including the Iphone 4s. In fact I was recently billed 350$ for roaming charges last month, which prompted me to speak with a representative via the online chat regarding the significant increase she said that she was unable to process any sort of credit to the account regardless of what I had been told at a local Verizon store where I purchased the tablet.
As a result of all of these mishaps since arriving here in Alaska I determined I was in need of newer devices that utilize the 4G LTE network currently provided by Verizon in Alaska. I know for a fact that the 4G LTE works great up here because my Nexus 7 tablet runs flawlessly and does not incur roaming charges when utilizing the 4G LTE network.
Yesterday I attempted to contact Verizon through the live chat feature regarding upgrading two of the devices on my account. The live chat representative immediately asked me when my upgrade date was. Upon telling her my upgrade date 9/29/2014 she told me I should contact the customer service department as I might be eligible for an early upgrade. I then proceeded to contact the customer service department using my Iphone 4.
My attempt to speak to anyone in the customer service department resulted in a merry-go-round of being put on hold 6 separate times by two different employees, both of which had me wait for more than an hour while they attempted to speak to a manager to gain approval for an early upgrade. The first rep seemed almost sure she would be able to have my devices upgraded early especially considering the issues I was having regarding service.
The second rep seemed newer and was very dodgy about my questions and was very unwilling to help at first. He even mentioned that I had been a Verizon customer for almost two years, had never missed a single payment and had outstanding account history which should have garnered some sort of importance to the level of my request. But I digress, during this time I was disconnected from the call twice from each separate representative.
Both reps assured me they would call me back, I never did get a call back from either one of those reps and I was becoming very frustrated having waited four hours trying to find some sort of solution to my current predicament.
After waiting an hour for the second representative to call back I grew impatient and contacted the customer service department, was put on hold again, and finally reached a third customer service representative who was able to provide a solution for me.
I explained everything I had been dealing with to Cory ID # V0PAC61, both regarding the phones, the issue of the level of service I was receiving, the dire need for working devices and the multiple times I had been disconnected. I explained to him as a result of these issues I was certainly considering switching to a different provider, a local provider even who could provide me the adequate service that I require for my mobile devices.
I explained to Cory that I had been with Verizon for almost two years, and I had been on a relatives account prior to owning my own Verizon account and had never received this kind of treatment when trying to work towards a simple solution. Cory proceeded to tell me he needed to put me on hold to see if there was anything that could be done regarding the upgrades of the device considering all of the trouble I had been dealing with.
After Cory reconnected with me in the phone call he was able to successfully reach a solution by allowing me to upgrade my devices. We conversed about the options available and I eventually decided to upgrade both Iphone 4 devices to Moto X devices as we determined those would be sufficient for my needs while in Alaska. I also proceeded to add two Otter Box Defender cases to the order so that the devices would have sufficient protection. Cory inquired as to whether or not I would like to purchase insurance for the phones as well and I opted for the $5.00 monthly insurance which including damage and water protection.
Cory explained to me the grand total for the devices which included an activation fee of $35.00 for each device, $49.99 for each Otter Box case, and an additional $50.00 for each device which would be refunded as a rebate upon receipt of the devices and activation, a rebate that I would be required to submit. Cory explained to me that the devices would most likely arrive Tuesday of 6/17 and no later than Wednesday 6/18.
Cory took my shipping information and told me everything was all set and the only thing left to do was to transfer me to the automated service so that I could accept the 2 year agreement for both devices. I thanked him very much, took his name and ID# so that I might leave positive feedback about his exemplary customer service and was then transferred to the automated service.
Once transferred to the automated service I was then prompted to enter both telephone numbers for the devices that would be upgraded, I was then required to accept the new 2 year agreement for both devices and after doing so I was required to end the call. I did so in an orderly fashion and expected a confirmation # to arrive in my email regarding the placed order.
I have never received a confirmation email. I decided to sleep on it and assumed a confirmation email would be sent sometime tomorrow. Nothing has since been received however. I woke up early this morning around 6AM Alaska time to speak to another live chat representative, Bryan, in the billing department who assured me the order was currently processing and verified the order #. I asked him whether or not it was typical for a customer to not receive a confirmation email for an order placed and he said it can sometimes take up to 2-3 business days. He then stated that he had taken note of the issues I was experiencing and told me he would transfer me to the sales department as they would be able to provide more information regarding the shipment of both devices and a confirmation email, as he stated he did not want me to have to wait any longer than necessary to receive said devices.
I was then transferred to Devon in the sales department via the live chat service where I was then required to repeat everything I had said to both Bryan and the other representatives I had spoken too. After a lengthy discussion and repeating everything I have just wrote he told me the order was indeed processing and that he would send a confirmation email in the next 30 minutes.
That was 2 hours ago. It is now 8am Alaska time and I still have not received a confirmation email regarding my order. I was sent an email by Verizon an hour ago stating I had a device to "discover". The email contained no information regarding the shipment of my device, the order confirmation number, or anything regarding my account. The email I received was a typical spam email asking an individual to check out the current available phones and sign up for a new contract.
All I want is a confirmation email to assure that the devices are being sent. I need my phone for work and to communicate with my family in the lower 48. I desperately need to make sure that the device is in fact being sent to the proper address, this is why a confirmation email of the order is so important. I do not care about the shipping speed I just want what I ask to be taken care of for a change. I would hate to sit here unable to determine what the status of my devices are only for the order to be stuck in "processing" limbo and be unable to receive the devices when I was told they would be sent.
I feel I have been given the run around treatment way more than is typically given with any company when an individual is trying to work towards a solution. I have been patient and cordial with everyone I have spoken with, I have not raised my voice or shown stress or anger towards the situation I have only tried my best to work towards a solution with anyone I have spoken too but I am becoming increasingly frustrated with this situation.
Any help regarding this matter would be greatly appreciated. This situation has left a sour taste in my mouth and if the devices were indeed not actually processed in an order, or they were not shipped correctly, or in fact if the order had never existed at all it will only deter me from keeping my Verizon account active and affect my decision to switch to another provider.

Hello APVzW, we absolutely want the best path to resolution. My apologies for multiple attempts of replacing the device. We'd like to verify the order information and see if we can locate the tracking number. Please send a direct message with the order number so we can dive deeper. Here's steps to send a direct message: http://vz.to/1b8XnPy We look forward to hearing from you soon.
WiltonA_VZW
VZW Support
Follow us on twitter @VZWSupport

Issue regarding Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART in SAP TPM IP

Gurus,
I am facing an issue regarding SAP TPM IP ( HANA)
I have 3 Infoproviders
Planning infocube, Planning DSO1, Planning DSO2 and i created multiprovider and added these 3 infoproviders into it. I have created Aggregation level on multiprovider. Created Bex Input ready query on Aggregation level.
Issue is Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART.
I tried debugging it and found it is trying to read i_r_pro -> n_ts_part. It is populated with only 3 values (i.e. 2DSOs and 1 Cube), whereas <l_partprov>-partprov is referring to Aggergation level, hence read statement isn't successful, it is dumping.
The class CL_RSD_INFOPROV_CACHE->GET() method is trying to populate the N_TS_PART.N_TS_PART uses P_R_INFOPROV table which seems to be already populated. So, I debugged all the below methods to find out how the P_R_INFOPROV but couldn't find any clue.
Can any one help,it would be really help.
Thanks
Ashok

Hello Gregor,
On the launch of planning layout it throws an error message:
Planning is not possible RSCRM_IMP_CORE008.
When I debugged, i got to a point wherein
particular Real Time Planning DSO is
not getting retrieved under the MultiProivder in below class.
Class: CL_RSCRM_IMP_ACTIONS_SERVICE, Method: GET_INFOPROV is not
returning the real time Info-Provider Name(i.e. Planning DSO)
underlyingthe Multiprovider.
I've also tried to run the report mentioned by you for the Multiprovider but issue still exists.
Let me know, if you have any pointers on this topic.
Thanks,
Jomy

Have an issue regarding library books. My ereader is validated with Kobo account and Adobe Digital Editions account, but I get an error: 'this document is protected bij DRM and isn't available with your Adobe ID'.

Have an issue regarding library books. My ereader is validated with Kobo account and Adobe Digital Editions account, but I get an error: 'this document is protected bij DRM and isn't available with your Adobe ID'.

same problem for me. I am using abe edition 3 as I don't think 4 can be used with kobo. Book has been downloaded to kobo but it can't be read as it is not authorised.Help please

Payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563

Hi Payroll Experts,
I have a payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563 (October PY Run)
When i m runnning the Current month Payroll(October PY Run), Total Earning - total deductions are not matching with Net Pay. later i came to know that the system creates the WT /561 and deducts from the Net Pay.
But as per the Employee Payment Details , there is no recovery required from the employee for the past one year. But even then the system creates the WT /561. and deducts the same from NET Pay.
The followng are the WT details
IN - Period
OCT 2011
     /101 Total gross amount     118,897.00
     /110 Net payments/deductions     76,070.00-
     /550 Statutory net pay     95343
     /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     37,692.00-
     /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment      37,692.00-
     /559 Bank transfer                                                   34,317.00
     /560 Net pay     37,218.00
     /563 Claim from previous month     5,609.00
FOR Period
Sept- Oct
     /101 Total gross amount     49,213.00
     /110 Net payments/deductions      31,721.00-
     /550 Statutory net pay     41,529.00
     /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     14,591.00
     /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment     23,101.00-
     /553 Recalc.diff.to last payr.     37,692.00
     /559 Bank transfer                                                   14,591.00
     /560 Net pay     14,591.00
     /561 Claim     5,609.00
I request some body to throw siome light on the same.

Hi Experts,
Thanks for everyone for replying to my query ,
I have a doubt that If you check the WTs /551 and /552 in the IN PRD, the negative sign is coming for both the WTs
Is it correct?
And also, Assume that there may be a master data changes like Bank details and other deduction Wts happened in the month of Aug and now i m going to run the payroll for the month of Nov,
some of the employees having differences in the Net Pay, Eventhough the employee is having sufficient balances.
So how do i handle this issue
IS ther any way to solve this differences?
Please Let me know how to solve this issue.
Thanks

Issue with export in Excel in WAD

Hi
I have an issue with export to excel in WAD. I have a web template with two or more tabs.
On the webtemplate I have two buttons to export to excel. One to export the content from the active tab and one button to export content in all tabs.
My problem is that when I export to excel it always add the current/active content twice. I've tried with both buttons and they work as expected except that they export one table to much (the active).
can anyone help / give a clue what to look for.
br,
John
Edited by: John Dolph on Apr 15, 2010 10:50 AM

Hi
Sorry I has been a while but the problem still occurs,
I've defined my export button group like this in a seperate template and I expected that it would only return the resultset from TAB_A and TAB_B but it also export the resultset from the tab I'm currently on.
<bi:TEMPLATE_PARAMETERS name="TEMPLATE_PARAMETERS" />
            <bi:BUTTON_GROUP_ITEM name="TAB_BUTTONs" designheight="23" designwidth="300" >
                <bi:BUTTON_LIST type="ORDEREDLIST" >
                    <bi:BUTTON type="COMPOSITE" index="2" >
                        <bi:CAPTION value="EXCEL" />
                        <bi:TOOLTIP value="Table, Graph and/or Table/Graph download to PDF" />
                        <bi:ACTION type="CHOICE" value="INSTRUCTION" >
                            <bi:INSTRUCTION >
                                <bi:EXPORT >
                                    <bi:ITEM_REF_LIST type="UNORDEREDLIST" >
                                        <bi:ITEM_REF index="1" value="TAB_A_ANALYSIS" />
                                        <bi:ITEM_REF index="2" value="TAB_A_CHART" />
                                        <bi:ITEM_REF index="3" value="TAB_B_ANALYSIS" />
                                        <bi:ITEM_REF index="4" value="TAB_B_CHART" />
                                    </bi:ITEM_REF_LIST>
                                    <bi:EXPORT_FORMAT value="XLS" />
                                </bi:EXPORT>
                            </bi:INSTRUCTION>
                        </bi:ACTION>
                    </bi:BUTTON>

Issues regarding export scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for