Issues with upgrade from os x 10.7.5

hi
had 2 attempts in upgrade down load from os x 10.7.5 to os x mountain lion so i can use my apple tv correctly.... however im getting this error
An error occurred while running scripts from the package “mzps8185591984996783701.pkg”.
and then the file disappears

If you have more than one user account, these instructions must be carried out as an administrator.
Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
Select "/var/log/install.log" from the file list on the left. If you don't see that list, select
View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar. Then select the messages from the last installation or update attempt, starting from the time when you initiated it. If you're not sure when that was, start over and note the time. Copy them to the Clipboard (command-C). Paste into a reply to this message (command-V).
If there are runs of repeated messages, post only one example of each. Don’t post many repetitions of the same message.
When posting a log extract, be selective. Don't post more than is requested.
Please do not indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
Important: Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Edit it out by search-and-replace in a text editor before posting.

Similar Messages

Issues with upgrading from Acrobat 7 to Acrobat 8

Hi,
I need to purchase Acrobat 8 for a new writer. Currently, we are not planning on upgrading from Acroabt 7 to Acrobat 8 for 15-20 writers. Are there issues that I should be aware of--problems opening files distilled in 7, and vice-versa.
Thanks,
Emelda Ben Shoshan

Not really, but it will depend on what kind of pdf files you produce and if you use any standards for pdf conversion.
The main thing to look out for would be for the write with version 8 to make sure he doesn't produce 1.7 pdf files, as these will throw up a warning in earlier versions of Acrobat.

Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query

Hi All,
There is a Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query in a report painter.
This query is working fine when executed in 4.7 system where as it is running for more time in ECC6.0.
Select query is on the table COSP.
SELECT (FIELD_LIST)
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_COSP PACKAGE SIZE 1000
        FROM COSP CLIENT SPECIFIED
        WHERE GJAHR IN SELR_GJAHR
          AND KSTAR IN SELR_KSTAR
          AND LEDNR EQ '00'
          AND OBJNR IN SELR_OBJNR
          AND PERBL IN SELR_PERBL
          AND VERSN IN SELR_VERSN
          AND WRTTP IN SELR_WRTTP
          AND MANDT IN MANDTTAB
        GROUP BY (GROUP_LIST).
   LOOP AT I_COSP      .
     COSP                           = I_COSP      .
     PERFORM PCOSP       USING I_COSP-_COUNTER.
     CLEAR: $RWTAB, COSP                          .
     CLEAR CCR1S                         .
   ENDLOOP.
ENDSELECT.
I have checked with the table indexes, they were same as in 4.7 system.
What can be the reson for the difference in execution time. How can this be reduced without adjusting the select query.
Thanks in advance for the responses.
Regards,
Dedeepya.

Hi,
ohhhhh....... lots of problems in select query......this is not the way you should write it.
Some generic comments:
1. never use SELECT
                   endselect.
   SELECT
into table
   for all entries in table
where.
   use perform statment after this selection.
2. Do not use into corresponding fields. use exact structure type.
3. use proper sequence of fields in the where condition so that it helps table go according to indexes.
    e.g in your case
          sequence should be
LEDNR
OBJNR
GJAHR
WRTTP
VERSN
KSTAR
HRKFT
VRGNG
VBUND
PARGB
BEKNZ
TWAER
PERBL
sequence should be same as defined in table.
Always keep select query as simple as possible and perform all other calculations etc. afterwords.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Pranaya

My "undo" command does not work in the new version of GB. Please advise. This is a real problem. I had no issues with GB from iLife 11.

My "undo" command does not work in the new version of GB. Please advise. This is a real problem. I had no issues with GB from iLife 11.

Most likely you have Office 2004 which are PPC-only applications and will not work in Lion. Upgrade to Office 2011. Other alternatives are:
Apple's iWork suite (Pages, Numbers, and Keynote.)
Open Office (Office 2007-like suite compatible with OS X.)
NeoOffice (similar to Open Office.)
LibreOffice (a new direction for the Open Office suite.)

Stability issues after upgrade from 5 to 6.1?

Dear all,
my client plans to upgrade from WLS 5 to 6.1 soon. The application is
an intranet portal with Epicentric and Vignette used as additional
products.
However, some voices say that 6.1 has stability issues. Well, these
statements are rumours and lack any proof or even anecdotal evidence I
have heard of, and therefore it is very difficult to respond
appropriately.
Having said this, my questions are:
- Did any of you have stability issues after upgrading from 5 to 6.1
on Solaris?
- If yes, what were they and how did you solve them (e.g. upgrade to
SP 5)?
- In 1-2 sentences, what is the context of the application?
My goal is to present a evidence that the romoured stability issues
don't exist or/and a list of meastures to avoid/solve them, if any.
Many thanks in advance
Andreas

"Andreas Raab" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
my client plans to upgrade from WLS 5 to 6.1 soon. The application is
an intranet portal with Epicentric and Vignette used as additional
products.
However, some voices say that 6.1 has stability issues. Well, these
statements are rumours and lack any proof or even anecdotal evidence I
have heard of, and therefore it is very difficult to respond
appropriately.
Having said this, my questions are:
- Did any of you have stability issues after upgrading from 5 to 6.1
on Solaris?
- If yes, what were they and how did you solve them (e.g. upgrade to
SP 5)?
- In 1-2 sentences, what is the context of the application?
My goal is to present a evidence that the romoured stability issues
don't exist or/and a list of meastures to avoid/solve them, if any.Hi Andreas,
Normally proving that rumors are true is a responcibility of
rumors suppliers. Reverse does sound to me like a joke.
Regards,
Slava Imeshev
P.S. Current weblogic 6.1 is a stable product.

Issues with importing from excel

I have been running into a several issues with importing from Excel.
First my configuration
I am running SQL Developer ver 1.5.5 Build MAIN-5969
I am on a Windows XP Professional Version 2002 with Service Pack 3
I am importing into an Oracle 10g database.
1. SQL Developer doesn't work on Excel 2007, I have to save all my files into Excel 97-2003 format before I can use them.
2. If I run into an error loading and stop the process, SQL Developer doesn't release the Excel file and I get a sharing violation if I try to save the spreadsheet without closing SQL Developer.
3. I have found that I have to set print area to the area I want to work with, otherwise the import wizard tries to keep adding rows.
4. When using the Import wizard, it keeps adding commas on fields with numerics unless I specify the column in excel as text. Currently the column is formatted as General in the spreadsheet or I can change the wizard format to say the column is an integer, but it actually is just a code field with numeric characters so it may have leading zeroes that I need to keep.
This might be related,
I have a column in excel defined as text but only contains numerics. It is of length 4, but the wizard sets a precision of 5 with a datatype of VARCHAR2. If I try to change it to 4, I get an error saying the field is not large enough. Yet, when I do a LEN on the column, it only gives me a 4. I have other fields in the same sheet that a 3 position numeric and 2 position numeric and those are fine. I am thinking this is related to the comma being inserted in a numeric field for anything greater than 3 positions.
5. Importing excel dates to oracle dates doesn't work. I have to convert the excel date column to text then import as a VARCHAR, then convert to Date once in the database.
6. The default of nullible is not set on any columns and I have to set them before the import. (I would prefer it set to nullible and I have to uncheck the box to make it not nullible. I would prefer to import all of the data and then deal with the nulls after they have been pulled in)
7. When I select header columns included it uses that as the column names. Is it possible to do the name length check then? It has bit me a few times where I try to import and forget to check the name length and then I get an error when I start running the import.
8. If one of the columns to import has all nulls, then the precision comes out to 0 and if it isn't changed an error occurs on import. Could this situation default to a precision of 1?
9. It would be nice if there was a completion message displayed and a cancel option while running.

On point 3.
I have a column in excel that consists of numbers. 4 digit numeric codes. Ex, 1111, 2345, etc
The column's format is general. It displays as just 4 numbers.
When I start the wizard initially, the column appears with data as 1,111, 2,345, etc, on the Data Preview screen.
It determines the precision to be 5 on the column definition screen.
If I change the precision to 4 then continue, that field will error out when I verify with "not big enough to hold the data in source columns"
If, I change the excel column to a TEXT column.
Excel still displays as 1111, 2345, etc
The wizard then displays the same data 1111, 2345 on the Data Previeiw screen
Yet, when I get to the column definition screen it still sizes it as a 5
If I change it to a 4, I get the same error when verifying.
If I leave them alone as 5, then it processes just fine.

Issues with upgrading Hyperion HFM from 11.1.2 to 11.1.2.1

Hi,
After the recent release of Hyperion 11.1.2.1, we upgraded our development environment to 11.1.2.1 from 11.1.2.
Installation and configuration was smooth straight forward [ We used the Maintenance upgrade while installing 11.1.2.1 ].
We migrated the application created from 11.1.2 to 11.1.2.1 using copy App. We saw following issues.
1. We are unable to run consolidation and we get following Error: “An unknown error has occurred in the HsvData2 object”
2. Every time when we login to HFM workspace and run reports we see database authentication window, we have to enter admin credentials for first time.
3. We are unable to load a Rule File in 11.1.2.1, which was loaded successfully in 11.1.2.
Any details on the above issues or on the upgrade from 11.1.2 to 11.1.2.1 would be of great help.
Thanks and Regards,
Bhargav

I am going to throw out the most unexciting reply ever, but .... the answer probably lies in the 11.1.2.1 readme.
V25453-01 From : https://edelivery.oracle.com/EPD/Download/get_form?egroup_aru_number=13638318
Consolidation
When running a consolidation, the following error may occur: “An unknown error has occurred in the HsvData2 object” with a description of: “Value violated the integrity constraints for a column or table” and the following problem: “Cannot insert duplicate key in object”. To resolve this error, delete invalid records.
I didn't look at the other issues; however, once again, I think the answers are most likely contained in the readmes.
Charles

Issue with Upgrading to 2nd Generation MotoX

Dear Verizon Wireless and Motorola Mobility,
Your 2nd Generation Moto X Upgrade program is fatally flawed and my experience highlights everything that could possibly go wrong when attempting to upgrade an existing plan.
As Verizon replied to my tweet (my twitter name is @melting_plastic), “Getting a new phone should be an exciting time.” but my experience has been everything but that.
My current phone is a Motorola Droid Razr Maxx. This was my first entry into the Android operating system and I fell in love. As a former Blackberry user, I was a bit hesitant to switch but upon receiving this phone in May of 2012, I had nothing but a great experience with it. This experience made want to continue with a Motorola phone upon my next available upgrade and I had waited to upgrade my phone until the newest Motorola phones were announced. I put off my upgrade for over 5 months waiting for the announcement of a new phone with my current phone deteriorating. The battery life has dropped to less than 2 hours and it has begun to freeze constantly with all the upgrades to software that it is unable to handle. Due to these issues, I checked every day waiting for an announcement of the new Moto X to be release and was finally happy when it was announced it would be released on September 27th for Verizon.
On the morning of Friday September 27th, I attempted to order my phone, a 32gb model, through the MotoMaker website and my first issue arose. Even though I was eligible for an upgrade, the MotoMaker website required a credit check for me to upgrade. As I am not the primary account holder, I did not feel comfortable inputting my father's information for a credit check. I also felt it was not necessary as I was paying the $149.99 by my credit card and the account has been with Verizon since the mid 1990's while it was still Bell Atlantic. As I was eligible for an upgrade and not a new account, it seemed a bit much that this credit check was needed. After searching the internet, I found many posts from the original Moto X release about this issue and the solution was to go to a Verizon Wireless store and pre-purchase the phone there and use the provided pin to order the phone at the MotoMaker website.
During my lunch break on September 27th, I visited the Wireless Zone retailer in Malvern Pennsylvania and waited for over 45 minutes to talk to an associate in an attempt to pre-purchase this phone and receive a pin for the website. This associated had no information about the ability to purchase this pin nor could he order the 32gb model directly for me. He apologized to me about the wait and his inability to fulfill my order but recommended me to go to a retail Verizon Wireless store as they may be able to help me.
After returning to work, I decided to attempt to discuss my issue using the Verizon Wireless help chat on its website. The operator suggested to call the Verizon support line and that they should be able to help me on this purchase. I proceeded to place the call, once again waiting on hold for 30 minutes, until I finally was able to talk to a representative. This representative was unable to help me but transferred me to another department that may be able to. After a brief hold, I was transferred to an individual who was finally able to help me out. He informed me that the 32gb model was not in the Verizon system but was expected to be added on October 1st. He apologized for the wait but at least he was able to provide me with valid information.
On Saturday October 4th, I visited the Verizon Retail location in King of Prussia Pennsylvania and once again waited 45 minutes before being seen by a representative. This time I was helped by an associate named Jeremy who knew exactly what I meant by purchasing a pin. After a bit of struggling to properly place the order, the order was placed with the help of a manager, at the price of $199.99 with a $50 mail-in-rebate. This became the 2nd area of disappointment. Not only did I have to wait to purchase this phone but I had to pay an increased rate up front and needed to send in for a mail-in-rebate. I thanked Jeremy for his help and headed back to my residence 15 miles away.
Once home, I attempted to place the order for my phone. As I live 100+ miles away from the primary account address, I had planned to have the phone shipped to my work as I had done when I purchased my Droid Razr Maxx. The MotoMaker website prevented me from changing the shipping address and I was once against frustrated by this process. I used the MotoMaker online support tool and they informed me that I must contact Verizon and they can adjust the shipping address as each PIN has a pre-defined shipping address attached to it.
I called Verizon's technical support line at approximately 4:30PM from my home phone. After once again waiting on hold for half an hour, I was finally connected to an associate and she was very friendly and attempted to help me with my shipping issue. She understood my frustration and placed a 3-way call between her, myself and Motorola support. During this call, she and myself became very frustrated with Motorola support staff as they refused to adjust the shipping address and stated that there was nothing that they could do. She apologized to me and suggested that I return to the King of Prussia location and attempt to sort it out there.
Begrudgingly, I returned to the Verizon location and once again waited to speak to Jeremy. He apologized for my situation and saw the only way to rectify it was to have FedEx adjust the shipment address after it had been shipped. He informed me that any charges that would be incurred to do so would be credited to my account if I returned to the store with the receipt.
I returned home and attempted to place the order again. This time I was able to adjust my shipping address and placed the order. While doing so, I received an error message and was instructed to call Motorola's support line. I called this line at around 7:45PM and spoke to a gentleman named Christian. He opened up support case 141005-006808 and informed me that because of my attempt to change the shipping address, this was why the error occurred. He instructed me to attempt to replace the order using the original supplied address and e-mail account and that I “must” use the Chrome web browser. This statement of having to use the Chrome browser was a complete fallacy and he refused to accept that any other browser could be used to properly order the phone. I installed the Chrome browser, attempted to order the phone and this time I was informed that my PIN was already used, likely during the original failed attempt. Christian informed me that he must escalate the issue and it would take an additional 24-48 hours. The simple act of creating a new PIN should not take this amount of time.
On Monday October 6th, I was finally able to get in contact with another associate from Motorola who was instantly able to create a new PIN for me. I once again placed the order and this time it went through with no issue, order number 00789348. The only disappointment was that I now had to wait until “approximately October 27th” to receive my new phone. During my waiting period, I periodically check the MotoMaker website and during that time, noticed that they offered an additional $50 discount on the Verizon Moto X which would have brought my total down to $99.99. So on top of the additional wait and disappointment, I had now paid $100 over the current price through MotoMaker .
On Tuesday, October 22nd, I finally received the e-mail stating that my phone had shipped and was due to arrive in Forked River, NJ on October 23rd. Using the FedEx website, I attempted to adjust my shipping address to my work, at the cost of $30 and a delay until Friday October 24th. I was unable to perform this action and then attempted to adjust the shipping address to the location I would be at Friday night (my sister's house) for the same delay, but only a cost of $5. Once again I was unable to perform this action and decided to call FedEx directly. After speaking to the associate at FedEx, she informed me that the only way to adjust the address was to have the shipper, Motorola Mobility adjust the address. With my previous issues with Motorola, I knew that this request would be denied. At this point, my only recourse is to have my parents ship me the phone to my work once they receive it on October 23rd. Even then, I'm unsure if FedEx will leave the phone at the location without a signature if no one is there to sign for it, which is why I attempted to ship the phone to my work.
At this point, I'm extremely dissatisfied with both Verizon and Motorola with how this whole situation has transpired. I feel a though I should have purchased an Apple iPhone 6 even though I am not a fan of the iOS platform or a different Android OS manufacturer. As a Fios account holder, I am also tempted to switch to the competition after 3+ years of being a customer. I feel that both Motorla and Verizon failed to rectify any hardship I had experienced in my attempt to purchase this phone and even now fear that I will not receive my phone in time to mail in mail-in-rebate which needs to be postmarked by November 1st.

MPerreca, This is quite a lot for you to have to go through! We surely don't want to lose your business as we appreciate your loyalty with us. I understand the challenges that can come in needing the shipping address changed on your phone orders. I'm glad to learn that the phone is now on it's way.
I'm confident that you'll be fine with submitting the rebate for your phone. If you do run into troubles with the submission, please let us know. You can also pre-submit your rebate information, here: http://bit.ly/1kKwKJK. Let us know if you have further concerns.
TanishaS1_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Stability issues after upgrading from OS 10.2.6 to OS 10.2.8

Hey to all the Mac experts,
I'm new to the Macs. I recently purchased a 2nd hand Power Mac G3 Beige Desktop for really cheap to learn and get a better understanding of Macs. It currently has 256 mb ram, G3 300 mhz cpu, 10 gig WD HD, 4.7 gig Mac DVD drive, 10 mb NIC, floppy, original mouse and keyboard, an USB add-on card, and video port adapter to use with SVGA monitors. It came with Mac OS 10.2 Jaguar loaded on and cd's. From the info, this older unit can't support or run 10.3 or 10.4. So, I'm fine with 10.2.
My main concern is issues when I use the Software update feature and upgraded from 10.2.6 to 10.2.8. This MAC should run 10.2.8 according to the specs. After the update and restart, I sometimes get a blank screen, or can't move the mouse, lockups and random keyboard issues. I ended up reinstalling from scratch with just cds. I didn't load any 3rd party software. I reran the software update feature again. Same thing as before. After erasing and reloading a 2nd time. I only did the updates for everything but up to 10.2.8. I searched the apple site and downloaded the updates from 10.2.0 to 10.2.6. So, no problem with that. The only 3rd party software currently installed is Firefox 1.5 and adobe reader 6.01 plus all software updates for Quicktime, Safari, etc.
Now my question is, what is the reason why it can't properly run version 10.2.8? Is there a workaround or solution to this problem? I know I could get by with 10.2.6, but what's the point when it should load and run 10.2.8 according to the specs here?
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=43124
Thanks in advance for any info.
PS> I read about sometimes Macs need a firmware update to properly run Mac OS 10. So, this is the only firmware I found for this MAC and it turns out I don't need it.
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25176
Mac G3 Beige Desktop Mac OS X (10.2.x) 256 mb ram, 10 gig hd, 300 mhz

Hi macsoprano,
Hello
First of all, welcome to the Apple discussions.
I don't think that this is a Firmware issue.
Download the combo updater via this link: Combo Updater
Don't forget repair permissions before and after the update
Disk Repair Permissions
* Good luck ...
Dimaxum

Samsung SSD causing problem with upgrade from Windows 8.0 to 8.1

I'm having trouble upgrading my HP Desktop from the OEM installed Windows 8.0 to 8.1. I first attempted the upgrade when 8.1 was first rolled out. It seemed to upgrade okay, but after a reboot I was left with a black screen... no error messages, just a black screen.
I retried it this morning, but this time it failed with DPC_Watchdog_Exception and then Machine_Check_Exception. After searching through several forums, I'm "guessing" it may be Disk 0, which is a Samsung 830 Series SSD (Model: MZ7PC256/0H1, s/n: S0U3NSAC705912, p/n: MZ7PC256HAFU-000H1) that was installed and configured by HP when I ordered this desktop in 2012.
Samsung's Magician software doesn't recognize this SDD as a supported product, but they do identify it as a Samsung MZ7PC256HAFU-000H1, with Firmware version CXM05H1Q. I thought I'd see if a firmware upgrade was available, but there's no information about this SSD on Samsung's support site. Also, HP doesn't offer any firmware for this SSD... not even the original firmware. Everything I've seen on the internet says it's a custom OEM SSD that's not supported by Samsung.
I'm not desparate to upgrade to Win8.1, but I would like to know exactly why the upgrade keeps failing. I have another SSD available (a Samsung 850 Pro, model: MZ-7KE256BW) that I've considered using to replace the current Drive 0, but I hate swapping out parts without knowing it's actually the problem.
I'm open to advice. The info on my current system follows. Also, I should point out that there are no device conflicts nor outdate drivers.
HP Envy h8-1420t CTO Desktop PC, s/n: 2MD3020CF9, Product No. C1U69AV #ABA
Windows 8 Pro 64 (installed by HP)
Intel Core i7-3770 3rd Gen, Quad-core (Ivy Bridge) 64-bit Processor, 3.4GHz
Memory: 16GB DDR3
Drive 0: 256GB SSD, Samsung 830 Series, Model: MZ7PC256/0H1, s/n: S0U3NSAC705912, p/n: MZ7PC256HAFU-000H1
Drive 1: 1TB 7200 rpm SATA hard drive, Model: WD10EZEK-60ZF5A0, s/n: WCC1S1261511
Drive 2: 750GB SSD, Samsung 840 Series, Model: MZ-7TE750BW, s/n: S1DMNEADB03609
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi,
You will find the latest firmware for the Samsung 830 at the Samsung SSD download site. Additionally, you will also find the latest version of the Samsung Magician.
Backup your data and be sure to create the external HP recovery media.
I prefer not to clone but rather to use the external HP recovery media to load the SSD.
If you are not on the latest SSD firmware then flash the SSD. Use the latest version of the Magician to do so.
Disable Secure Boot in the BIOS before cloning the hard drive.
Then reformat and clone the SSD using the latest Samsung migration software. Use the original HP hard drive as the source and it needs to be intact as you need to bring across all of the partitions.
Power off the PC and disconnect the original boot HD.
Connect the SSD to the original boot SATA port.
Do not have any other SSDs or hard drives connected that contain an EFI partitions or you might run into issues with multiple Windows boot loders.
HP DV9700, t9300, Nvidia 8600, 4GB, Crucial C300 128GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium C309G, HP Photosmart 6520
HP Touchpad, HP Chromebook 11
Custom i7-4770k,Z-87, 8GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650,GTX 760
Custom i7-4790k,Z-97, 16GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Plextor M.2 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650, GTX 660TI
Windows 7/8 UEFI/Legacy mode, MBR/GPT

Issue in upgrading from Fatwire 7.6 to web center sites 1.1.1.6

Patch upgrade from Fatwire 7.6 to Web Center sites 1.1.1.6 is failing while importing catalog elements. The database ping and csLogin test is successfully completed at 75 % of the installation. After that below mentioned exception is coming in logs which is causing installation failure. Please provide your valuable pointers to troubleshoot this issue.
Access to CATALOGDIRECTORY and ELEMENTDIRECTORY is verified. Both paths are correct with full access.
PFB the logs.
===========================================================
[2013-12-08 20:29:48.724][CS.INSTALL][INFO] CSSetupEngine.postURL: PostURL success for http://devbox.corp.apple.com:12040/cs/HelloCS
[2013-12-08 20:29:49.145][CS.INSTALL][INFO] CSSetupEngine.doPing: Database Ping Successful.
[2013-12-08 20:30:10.411][CS.INSTALL][INFO] CSSetupEngine.testConnectionAction: Testing user configuration and database connectivity.
[2013-12-08 20:30:10.425][CS.INSTALL][INFO] CSSetupEngine.postURL: PostURL success for http://devbox.corp.apple.com:12040/cs/HelloCS
[2013-12-08 20:30:10.433][CS.INSTALL][INFO] CSSetupEngine.testConnectionAction:
Web Server and Application Server Configuration test finished successfully.
[2013-12-08 20:30:10.442][CS.INSTALL][INFO] CSSetupEngine.testConnectionAction: Attempting to Ping the Database.
[2013-12-08 20:30:10.462][CS.INSTALL][INFO] CSSetupEngine.doPing: Database Ping Successful.
[2013-12-08 20:30:10.473][CS.INSTALL][INFO] CSSetupEngine.Initialization: Testing user configuration and creating/verifying user tables.
[2013-12-08 20:30:10.475][CS.INSTALL][INFO] CSSetupEngine.initReinitAction:
ContentServer Database Initialization beginning...
[2013-12-08 20:30:11.041][CS.INSTALL][INFO] CSSetupEngine.initReinitAction: ContentServer Database Initialization Completed Successfully.
[2013-12-08 20:30:13.374][CS.INSTALL][INFO] ActionHandler.ExecuteCommand: ExecuteCommand success for http://devbox.corp.apple.com:12040/cs/Install?COMMANDNAME=SETJSPROOT&USERNAME=fwadmin&PASSWORD=<hidden password value>
[2013-12-08 20:30:13.472][CS.INSTALL][INFO] ActionHandler.ExecuteCommand: ExecuteCommand success for http://devbox.corp.apple.com:12040/cs/Install?COMMANDNAME=FLUSHPROPERTY&USERNAME=fwadmin&PASSWORD=<hidden password value>&propertyname=futuretense.ini
[2013-12-08 20:30:13.532][CS.INSTALL][ERROR] ActionHandlerExecuteCommand: ExecuteCommand failed for http://devbox.corp.apple.com:12040/cs/Install?COMMANDNAME=IMPORTCATALOG&USERNAME=fwadmin&PASSWORD=<hidden password value>&CATALOGDIRECTORY=%2Fnps%2Fapp%2Ffsnd%2Fcm%2Fcmsd%2FCRMBASE%2FScopes%2Fcms%2F11gR1archives%2FWCS_Sites_11%2FSites%2FContentServer%2FInstallation&ELEMENTDIRECTORY=%2Fnps%2Fapp%2Ffsnd%2Fcm%2Fcmsd%2FCRMBASE%2FScopes%2Facms%2Fprdm_cs_shared%2F%2Felements
The response that was received =
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
HOST_SERVICE: FutureTenseContentServer:11.1.1.6.1
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:30:13 GMT
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Set-Cookie: JSESSIONID=CC6C6BB6AEA70CC05287299877843F52; Path=/cs
Content-Type: text/html;charset=UTF-8
Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1
<html><head><title>Hello World!</title></head><body>Welcome to WebCenter Sites 11gR1! Oracle WebCenter Sites 11gR1 11.1.1.6.1 
Copyright (c) 2012 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. 
Copyright (c) 2003 - 2011 FatWire Corporation All Rights Reserved. 
Copyright (c) 2001 - 2003 divine, inc. All Rights Reserved. 
Copyright (c) 1999 - 2001 Open Market, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 
Copyright (c) 1998 - 1999 FutureTense, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 
 
Oracle WebCenter Sites | Satellite Server 11.1.1.6.1 Build Date: Oct 23 2012 at 20:48:36 Build Number: 2371 Revision:152889 
Oracle WebCenter Sites 11gR1 11.1.1.6.1 
Copyright (c) 2012 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. 
Copyright (c) 2003 - 2011 FatWire Corporation All Rights Reserved. 
Copyright (c) 2001 - 2003 divine, inc. All Rights Reserved. 
Copyright (c) 1999 - 2001 Open Market, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 
Copyright (c) 1998 - 1999 FutureTense, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 
 
Oracle WebCenter Sites 11.1.1.6.1 Build Date: Oct 23 2012 at 20:48:36 Build Number: 2371 Revision:152889 
<hr>Sun Dec 08 20:30:13 GMT+00:00 2013 View source to see embedded status Result :
</body></html>
[2013-12-08 20:30:13.548][CS.INSTALL][ERROR] ActionHandlerExecuteCommand: Error Importing Installation Elements
[2013-12-08 20:30:13.585][CS.INSTALL][ERROR] Worker.run.
Install failed.
Please check log file.
Click Yes to modify your install choices
and re-try install.
Click No to terminate application.
=====================
Thanks,
Anil

May be it is expecting wlserver_10.3 directory.
Can you try giving a link to one directory above wlserver_10.3 OR the complete path to wlserver_10.3 directory.
One of this should make the upgrade successful.
Arun

Preformance issues when upgrading from dbxml 2.3.8 to 2.4.13

I have recently upgraded my dbxml distribution from 2.3.8 to 2.4.13 (including the latest patch). I have noticed that many of the queries I issue take longer than they used to. Specifically if the query is complex it takes 10 times as long as it did with 2.3.8. Also I have noted a difference in speed between issuing the query via the dbxml shell (query takes ~45 seconds) vs issuing it through a c++ interface (query takes 4+ minutes). The query am issuing is:
for $i in collection('projectDatabase.dbxml')/project
where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low >= 0.654498) or (obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high >= 0.654498) or (0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high and 0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high < obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) and ((0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (2.61799 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or (2.61799 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low)))) and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test']
return $i
if I simplify the query by removing references to the obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high nodes:
for $i in collection('projectDatabase.dbxml')/project
where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test']
return $i
it returns much faster. I am wondering if this is an issue with optimization of the complex query?
The database is fully indexed and was re-indexed when I upgraded to 2.4.13

Doug,
I've got your container. It's a wholedoc container with document indexes (a lot of them). Here's what I see for query speeds for your large, slow query using the dbxml shell.
Query is:
query "for $i in collection('pdb.dbxml')/project where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low >= 0.654498) or (obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high >= 0.654498) or (0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high and 0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high < obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) and ((0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (2.61799 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or (2.61799 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low)))) and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test'] return $i"
2.3.11 -- 2.4 seconds
2.4.13 -- 60 seconds
That is a significant slowdown and it needs further investigation but is almost certainly related to the fact that it is wholedoc storage. The optimizer appears to be choosing unwisely. This will take a few days to work out.
I also changed the container to be node storage with node indexes and the times went to:
2.3.11 -- 13 sec (slower than wholedoc)
2.4.13 -- 40 sec (faster than wholedoc)
I do know why your application is slower than the dbxml shell. There is a new flag that should almost always be used for wholedoc container queries -- DBXML_DOCUMENT_PROJECTION. Add that to you query excecution.
Another thing -- query preparation is a bit slower in 2.4 so you should use prepared queries whenever possible to amortize that cost.
Regards,
George

Fund Management - Issues in Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6

Hello,
We are upgrading SAP Application for a client who is on 4.6C to ECC6. The client is currently using Funds Management in 4.6C. With ECC6 I understand that this functionality is moved into Public Sector and is available only on activation of IS-PS Extension Set.
The question I have is that does this activation impact any other business processes or is just a technical activation.
What I mean is that if I activate this extension set does the system start doing things differently and needs specific data related to Public Sector which the business users will be required to be entered while doing transactions OR the activation will not impact business processes as such and would work as earlier with Funds management active. (except where there was a change in the functionality between 4.6C to ECC6)
I would like to know the risks, if any involved in upgrading Funds Management from 4.6C to ECC6.
Please reply and let me know any question to get more clarity on the issue.
Best Regards
Kuldeep

Hi Kuldeep,
There are several main issues that have to be addresses when upgrading from 4.6 to ECC6. The main ones are:
1 - Derivations. The object are no longer connected through tables or master data entries (you may have a table that links Cost Centers to Funds Centers for example). These assignments are now maintained through a flexible derivation tool. These derivation rules have to be maintaind, or the posting addresses will have no FM values and you will not be able to post any documents.
2 - Inventory purchases. The inventory purchases scenarios are no longer maintained through the customization (you can no longer choose one of the 4 inventory scenarios, and there's no warehouse Funds Center). These are all maintained through derivations.
3 - BCS. There's a new budgeting and AVC tool called "Budget Control System" (BCS). You can either activate it, or keep working with the old budgeting (called "former" in the customization). The new BCS affords flexibility in budgeting and AVC, including several AVC ledgers.
More data regarding migrations can be found in documentation. If you want, I can send you the PDF document.
Best regards,
Shahaf Yaari
[email protected]

EVDRE Access Issue Post Upgrade from BPC 5.1 SP3 to BPC 7.0 SP6

Greetings,
Recently upgraded from BPC 5.1SP3 to BPC 7.0 SP6. Experiencing some strange behavior regarding the ability to send data to BPC from an EVDRE. Both users are part of the same secuity team, thus have the same security in both versions. However, one is able to send data to BPC 7.0 SP6 for a specific input template while the other recieves a message "There is no data to refresh." This message is not encountered in BPC 5.1 SP3.
The strange thing is that the user who receives the "there is no data to refresh" is able to rebuild the input template ad hoc and send data to BPC
I have reviewed security, cleared the cache on the user's machine. I had the user with this issue log onto the app server; she encountered the same behavior regarding this template. Also tested a seperate input template in another application, this issue did not occurr.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Greg Lakin

Hi, n
 From your description it looks like the problem si more related to that specific user. Please try to reprocess the security for that user. Then go on file server and go into <appset>/<application>/<private publication>/<user name> and delete appinfo.zip.
 Other idea can be related to the excel cache, but I don;t know why is not working for this specific user. You can try to save it in a new template as Patrick indicated.
You can try also clear local application information from admin client or try from other machine using the same client.
Hope this can hekp you,
Mihaela

MBP issues with waking from sleep and on opening lid

I have a 2009 macbook pro just 3 weeks old! upgraded from an older macbook
the problem is when it goes to sleep mode and i wake it by opening the lid or pressing any key (trackpad clicking wont wake it) the curser is unresponsive, as are all of the keys apart form the power button - it brings up the box asking if i want to shut down or restart. But I cant choose any as no curser movement! so I have to hold in the power button to hard restart everytime.
I rang apple support who I must say are very helpful everytime. I reset the PRam, reset factory settings ect then he said if still no joy reinstall the system.
All of which I have tried and it is still doing the same problem.
I shall have to give them a call in the morning to see what else they suggest.
Has anyone else had this issue on a new macbook - all updates have been installed and I only use it for web and emails ect so no weird installs going on
Thanks in advance
Liz

still no joy, did a reinstall of the OS and its still intermittently not waking once i close the lid and the hard drive stops.
The next thing to do is to get apple to have a look at it. very annoying as I have only had it since 28th Dec but nothing else I can do. Pc world will have it in to fix rather than replace so to be honest I'd rather Apple had a look than some monkey boy with fat clumsy fingers on a YTS scheme lol

Issues with upgrade from os x 10.7.5

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for