Issues with upgrading Hyperion HFM from 11.1.2 to 11.1.2.1

Hi,
After the recent release of Hyperion 11.1.2.1, we upgraded our development environment to 11.1.2.1 from 11.1.2.
Installation and configuration was smooth straight forward [ We used the Maintenance upgrade while installing 11.1.2.1 ].
We migrated the application created from 11.1.2 to 11.1.2.1 using copy App. We saw following issues.
1. We are unable to run consolidation and we get following Error: “An unknown error has occurred in the HsvData2 object”
2. Every time when we login to HFM workspace and run reports we see database authentication window, we have to enter admin credentials for first time.
3. We are unable to load a Rule File in 11.1.2.1, which was loaded successfully in 11.1.2.
Any details on the above issues or on the upgrade from 11.1.2 to 11.1.2.1 would be of great help.
Thanks and Regards,
Bhargav

I am going to throw out the most unexciting reply ever, but .... the answer probably lies in the 11.1.2.1 readme.
V25453-01 From : https://edelivery.oracle.com/EPD/Download/get_form?egroup_aru_number=13638318
Consolidation
When running a consolidation, the following error may occur: “An unknown error has occurred in the HsvData2 object” with a description of: “Value violated the integrity constraints for a column or table” and the following problem: “Cannot insert duplicate key in object”. To resolve this error, delete invalid records.
I didn't look at the other issues; however, once again, I think the answers are most likely contained in the readmes.
Charles

Similar Messages

Issue after upgrade the ASA5520 from 7.2.4 to 8.2.5,

i am having issue after upgrade the ASA5520 from 7.2.4 to 8.2.5, the LMI remote session getting disconnect in between in one of the outside interface
i am having issue after upgrade the ASA5520 from 7.2.4 to 8.2.5, the LMI remote session getting disconnect in between the session at one of the interface but working fine with another interface,
i have outside and backup interface which work on internet failover when internet routed through backup interface the issue getting started but working fine if traffic is going via outsid

i am having issue after upgrade the ASA5520 from 7.2.4 to 8.2.5, the LMI remote session getting disconnect in between in one of the outside interface
i am having issue after upgrade the ASA5520 from 7.2.4 to 8.2.5, the LMI remote session getting disconnect in between the session at one of the interface but working fine with another interface,
i have outside and backup interface which work on internet failover when internet routed through backup interface the issue getting started but working fine if traffic is going via outsid

Issue with configuring Hyperion HUB 7.1.2 with SQLSERVER 2005

Hello Experts,
One of my customer has an issue with configuring Hyperion HUB 7.1.2 with SQLSERVER 2005.
"We are trying to configure the SQL server 2005 database with Hyperion hub and we are unable to get the cofiguration completed. We suspect the driver class (hyperion.jdbc.sqlserver.SQLServerDriver) used in the domain.xml (path \Hyperion\HyperionHub\7.2.1\deployments\Tomcat\4.1.30\) is not helping to connect with sql server 2005. We would appreciate if you can provide new driver class which we can included while deploying the app under the web server."
Please suggest. Thanks in advance
Regards,
Sonu

Hi
Please redeploy only the Web Server under shared service. It has to be redeployed once EPMA and others are configured.
Thanks
Rupak
Mantra to Win | WinMantras.com | http://hyperion.winmantras.com

Issue with Executing OS commands from Stored Procedure

I am trying to execute the scripts provided at :
http://github.com/xtender/XT_SHELL
provided by xtender user.
As required, I have asked my DBAs to grant privileges by executing the following scripts:
Begin
--change to needed permissions and execute
dbms_java.grant_permission( 'ODS', 'SYS:java.io.FilePermission', '/var/factiva/ODS/bin/CVIM_Rpt_ExportCSVFile’, 'read,write,execute' );
end;
/where CVIM_Rpt_ExportCSVFile is my script residing in the Unix server where my Oracle is installed.
The error I am facing when I try to execute the following command is:
select * from table(xt_shell.shell_exec('/var/scripts/CVIM_Rpt_ExportCSVFile',100))
Exception:the Permission (java.io.FilePermission /var/scripts/CVIM_Rpt_ExportCSVFile execute) has not been granted to ODS. The PL/SQL to grant this is dbms_java.grant_permission( 'ODS', 'SYS:java.io.FilePermission', '/var/scripts/CVIM_Rpt_ExportCSVFile', 'execute' )I have asked my DBA to also execute the following scripts: - But I still see the same error as above. I am not able to figure out whats going on. Can anyone pls help me out??
EXEC Dbms_Java.Grant_Permission('ODS', 'SYS:java.lang.RuntimePermission', 'writeFileDescriptor', '');
EXEC Dbms_Java.Grant_Permission(ODS', 'SYS:java.lang.RuntimePermission', 'readFileDescriptor', '');
dbms_java.grant_permission( 'ODS', 'SYS:java.io.FilePermission', '/var/scripts/CVIM_Rpt_ExportCSVFile', 'execute' )

DUPLICATE
===============================================================
Issue with Executing OS commands from Stored Procedure
==============================================================

Is there an issue with streaming videos direct from itunes? I

Is there an issue with streaming videos direct from itunes? I have good wifi but films just buffer , doesn't happen on flixster on netflix , wonder if there is any tweak to watch a film uninterrupted , because it is very frustrating? Thanks

Apple appears to be having trouble with the iTunes Store servers right now.
(81070)

Upgrade Issue: With-holding TAX Conversion From Classic to Extended.

Dear Friends,
I am working for an Upgrade Project. (From 4.5 to ECC 6.0)
Please help me with steps for convesion of With-holding tax from Classic to Extended.
Your help will be appriciated and Rewarded.
Thank you,
DARSHAN PATEL

Hi,
Converting from classic to Extended withholding tax is possible but be sure once do.
Spro-Sap reference img-Financial accounting-withholding tax-withholding tax change over- MAP TAX CODES AND HEALTH CHECK AND MIGRATION PROGRAMS.
YOU HAVE TO UPDATE YOUR TAX CODES LIKE CENTRAL INVOICE PROPORTIONATELY...
IF IT HELPFUL ASSIGN POINTS, ANY PROBLEM REVERT BACK ME.
REGARDS,
SANKAR

Issues with upgrade from os x 10.7.5

hi
had 2 attempts in upgrade down load from os x 10.7.5 to os x mountain lion so i can use my apple tv correctly.... however im getting this error
An error occurred while running scripts from the package “mzps8185591984996783701.pkg”.
and then the file disappears

If you have more than one user account, these instructions must be carried out as an administrator.
Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
Select "/var/log/install.log" from the file list on the left. If you don't see that list, select
View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar. Then select the messages from the last installation or update attempt, starting from the time when you initiated it. If you're not sure when that was, start over and note the time. Copy them to the Clipboard (command-C). Paste into a reply to this message (command-V).
If there are runs of repeated messages, post only one example of each. Don’t post many repetitions of the same message.
When posting a log extract, be selective. Don't post more than is requested.
Please do not indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
Important: Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Edit it out by search-and-replace in a text editor before posting.

Issues after upgrading the Obiee from 10g to 11g

Hi all,
We have recently upgraded our rpd from 10g to 11g. And a part of Webcatlog is being upgraded. We observe issues with the upgraded reports.
As the for the report prompts the script was taking lot of time. And the browser pop's a message either to 'stop' or 'continue'.
The report is taking lot of time to run than the usual 10g environment. And the path BP1 is also applied for the 11g environment.
Please suggest a troubleshoot method to overcome the issues with the upgraded reports.
Thank you,
Chris.

Check this pdf file
http://www.rittmanmead.com/files/biforum2012/ranka_performance.pdf
If helps pls mark

Issue with Upgrading to 2nd Generation MotoX

Dear Verizon Wireless and Motorola Mobility,
Your 2nd Generation Moto X Upgrade program is fatally flawed and my experience highlights everything that could possibly go wrong when attempting to upgrade an existing plan.
As Verizon replied to my tweet (my twitter name is @melting_plastic), “Getting a new phone should be an exciting time.” but my experience has been everything but that.
My current phone is a Motorola Droid Razr Maxx. This was my first entry into the Android operating system and I fell in love. As a former Blackberry user, I was a bit hesitant to switch but upon receiving this phone in May of 2012, I had nothing but a great experience with it. This experience made want to continue with a Motorola phone upon my next available upgrade and I had waited to upgrade my phone until the newest Motorola phones were announced. I put off my upgrade for over 5 months waiting for the announcement of a new phone with my current phone deteriorating. The battery life has dropped to less than 2 hours and it has begun to freeze constantly with all the upgrades to software that it is unable to handle. Due to these issues, I checked every day waiting for an announcement of the new Moto X to be release and was finally happy when it was announced it would be released on September 27th for Verizon.
On the morning of Friday September 27th, I attempted to order my phone, a 32gb model, through the MotoMaker website and my first issue arose. Even though I was eligible for an upgrade, the MotoMaker website required a credit check for me to upgrade. As I am not the primary account holder, I did not feel comfortable inputting my father's information for a credit check. I also felt it was not necessary as I was paying the $149.99 by my credit card and the account has been with Verizon since the mid 1990's while it was still Bell Atlantic. As I was eligible for an upgrade and not a new account, it seemed a bit much that this credit check was needed. After searching the internet, I found many posts from the original Moto X release about this issue and the solution was to go to a Verizon Wireless store and pre-purchase the phone there and use the provided pin to order the phone at the MotoMaker website.
During my lunch break on September 27th, I visited the Wireless Zone retailer in Malvern Pennsylvania and waited for over 45 minutes to talk to an associate in an attempt to pre-purchase this phone and receive a pin for the website. This associated had no information about the ability to purchase this pin nor could he order the 32gb model directly for me. He apologized to me about the wait and his inability to fulfill my order but recommended me to go to a retail Verizon Wireless store as they may be able to help me.
After returning to work, I decided to attempt to discuss my issue using the Verizon Wireless help chat on its website. The operator suggested to call the Verizon support line and that they should be able to help me on this purchase. I proceeded to place the call, once again waiting on hold for 30 minutes, until I finally was able to talk to a representative. This representative was unable to help me but transferred me to another department that may be able to. After a brief hold, I was transferred to an individual who was finally able to help me out. He informed me that the 32gb model was not in the Verizon system but was expected to be added on October 1st. He apologized for the wait but at least he was able to provide me with valid information.
On Saturday October 4th, I visited the Verizon Retail location in King of Prussia Pennsylvania and once again waited 45 minutes before being seen by a representative. This time I was helped by an associate named Jeremy who knew exactly what I meant by purchasing a pin. After a bit of struggling to properly place the order, the order was placed with the help of a manager, at the price of $199.99 with a $50 mail-in-rebate. This became the 2nd area of disappointment. Not only did I have to wait to purchase this phone but I had to pay an increased rate up front and needed to send in for a mail-in-rebate. I thanked Jeremy for his help and headed back to my residence 15 miles away.
Once home, I attempted to place the order for my phone. As I live 100+ miles away from the primary account address, I had planned to have the phone shipped to my work as I had done when I purchased my Droid Razr Maxx. The MotoMaker website prevented me from changing the shipping address and I was once against frustrated by this process. I used the MotoMaker online support tool and they informed me that I must contact Verizon and they can adjust the shipping address as each PIN has a pre-defined shipping address attached to it.
I called Verizon's technical support line at approximately 4:30PM from my home phone. After once again waiting on hold for half an hour, I was finally connected to an associate and she was very friendly and attempted to help me with my shipping issue. She understood my frustration and placed a 3-way call between her, myself and Motorola support. During this call, she and myself became very frustrated with Motorola support staff as they refused to adjust the shipping address and stated that there was nothing that they could do. She apologized to me and suggested that I return to the King of Prussia location and attempt to sort it out there.
Begrudgingly, I returned to the Verizon location and once again waited to speak to Jeremy. He apologized for my situation and saw the only way to rectify it was to have FedEx adjust the shipment address after it had been shipped. He informed me that any charges that would be incurred to do so would be credited to my account if I returned to the store with the receipt.
I returned home and attempted to place the order again. This time I was able to adjust my shipping address and placed the order. While doing so, I received an error message and was instructed to call Motorola's support line. I called this line at around 7:45PM and spoke to a gentleman named Christian. He opened up support case 141005-006808 and informed me that because of my attempt to change the shipping address, this was why the error occurred. He instructed me to attempt to replace the order using the original supplied address and e-mail account and that I “must” use the Chrome web browser. This statement of having to use the Chrome browser was a complete fallacy and he refused to accept that any other browser could be used to properly order the phone. I installed the Chrome browser, attempted to order the phone and this time I was informed that my PIN was already used, likely during the original failed attempt. Christian informed me that he must escalate the issue and it would take an additional 24-48 hours. The simple act of creating a new PIN should not take this amount of time.
On Monday October 6th, I was finally able to get in contact with another associate from Motorola who was instantly able to create a new PIN for me. I once again placed the order and this time it went through with no issue, order number 00789348. The only disappointment was that I now had to wait until “approximately October 27th” to receive my new phone. During my waiting period, I periodically check the MotoMaker website and during that time, noticed that they offered an additional $50 discount on the Verizon Moto X which would have brought my total down to $99.99. So on top of the additional wait and disappointment, I had now paid $100 over the current price through MotoMaker .
On Tuesday, October 22nd, I finally received the e-mail stating that my phone had shipped and was due to arrive in Forked River, NJ on October 23rd. Using the FedEx website, I attempted to adjust my shipping address to my work, at the cost of $30 and a delay until Friday October 24th. I was unable to perform this action and then attempted to adjust the shipping address to the location I would be at Friday night (my sister's house) for the same delay, but only a cost of $5. Once again I was unable to perform this action and decided to call FedEx directly. After speaking to the associate at FedEx, she informed me that the only way to adjust the address was to have the shipper, Motorola Mobility adjust the address. With my previous issues with Motorola, I knew that this request would be denied. At this point, my only recourse is to have my parents ship me the phone to my work once they receive it on October 23rd. Even then, I'm unsure if FedEx will leave the phone at the location without a signature if no one is there to sign for it, which is why I attempted to ship the phone to my work.
At this point, I'm extremely dissatisfied with both Verizon and Motorola with how this whole situation has transpired. I feel a though I should have purchased an Apple iPhone 6 even though I am not a fan of the iOS platform or a different Android OS manufacturer. As a Fios account holder, I am also tempted to switch to the competition after 3+ years of being a customer. I feel that both Motorla and Verizon failed to rectify any hardship I had experienced in my attempt to purchase this phone and even now fear that I will not receive my phone in time to mail in mail-in-rebate which needs to be postmarked by November 1st.

MPerreca, This is quite a lot for you to have to go through! We surely don't want to lose your business as we appreciate your loyalty with us. I understand the challenges that can come in needing the shipping address changed on your phone orders. I'm glad to learn that the phone is now on it's way.
I'm confident that you'll be fine with submitting the rebate for your phone. If you do run into troubles with the submission, please let us know. You can also pre-submit your rebate information, here: http://bit.ly/1kKwKJK. Let us know if you have further concerns.
TanishaS1_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Upgrading Hyperion applications from EPM System 11.1.2.1 and 11.1.2.2. to 11.1.2.3

Hi,
I am triyng to upgrade Hyperion classic applications from 11.1.2.1 and 11.1.2.2 to 11.1.2.3. I restored application's databases which has SQL database and upgraded applications successfully. But the other applications that have Oracle databases, I can restore and upgrade the applications, but when I try to refresh database, it gives errors like that:
com.hyperion.planning.olap.HspVerifyOutlineException: Verify Outline failed with the following errors:
Error [100000800] detected in member "2012 Bakım": Shared member with no actual member
And it is only giving these errors for members which have Turkish characters. And it gives like as this error for member formulas which have Turkish characters:
Error compiling formula for [] (line 1): unknown member name ["Sözleşme Türü Belirle"] in function [operator @X]
This application is working in 11.1.2.1, but after I migrated it ot 11.1.2.3, it started to give these problems. I controlled my oracle database parameters and they look OK, I am sending them too:
NLS_LANGUAGE                   AMERICAN
NLS_TERRITORY                  AMERICA
NLS_CHARACTERSET               AL32UTF8
NLS_SORT                       BINARY
How can I solve this problem ?
Thanks
Mehmet

Hi Santy,
Thanks for your suggestion. We updated Turkish characters in DB then it's solved. When we create a shared member which has Turkish characters from zero, it gives no error while the refresh. And if we delete all shared members and create them again, it gives no error again. I think the problem is about upgrading.
Regards,
Mehmet

Issue with executing Business Rules from Planning web

Hi,
We are using Hyperion Planning 9.3.0.1 and we keep getting an issue with the Business Rules. We get an error if we try to run the rules from Planning web. The same rules validates and executes fine if we run it from AAS. This issue gets resolved if we restart the Planning and RMI service. But this issue keeps happening randomly. Is there a permanent resolution to it? Is it a bug or I am missing something here?
Thanks and Regards,
Amol
Edited by: user638718 on Apr 7, 2009 5:20 PM

Hi,
Have you installed any of the patches for 9.3.0.1, I think it goes up to 9.3.0.1.09
One of the fixes was :-
8-665086601 (6588823) – When the Business Rules connection to the relational database is lost, Business Rules does not reconnect to it. To solve this problem, an optional property, HBR_CONNECTION_VALIDATE_TIME, was added to HBRServer.properties. This property specifies a time interval for checking the connection between Business Rules and the relational database. If the connection is not valid, a new connection is established. The time interval is specified in milliseconds and defaults to 300,000 (five minutes).
Though I know there has been more attention to fixing known issues on 9.3.1 than 9.3.0.1
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Performance Issues during Upgrade of EBS from 11.5.10.2 to 12.1.1

Hi,
We're upgrading our EBS , from Rel 11.5.10.2 to 12.1.1.
We're stuck , while running script ar120bnk.sql (ran more than 20 Hours) :
Regarding the tables involved in this Process :
select owner , table_name,num_rows,last_analyzed,sample_size
from dba_tables
where table_name in
'RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL',
'RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL',
'XLA_UPGRADE_DATES',
'AR_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS_ALL',
'RA_CUST_TRX_TYPES_ALL',
'RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL',
'XLA_TRANSACTION_ENTITIES_UPG')
AR RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL 55,540,740 04/02/2012 12:41:56 5554074
AR RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL 380,513,830 04/02/2012 13:54:12 38051383
AR RA_CUST_TRX_TYPES_ALL 90 04/02/2012 14:04:54 90
AR AR_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS_ALL 6 04/02/2012 12:19:49 6
XLA XLA_UPGRADE_DATES 4 05/02/2012 17:12:57 4
As you can see: RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL is more tan 380 million rows !
and RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL is more than 55 million rows.
We have more huge tables in the AR schema , and we would like to know if we are unique customer
with huge AR schema objects , and if NOT how come that we are getting stuck on threed statment in
AR schema.
Bellow an output of all the objects that have more than 10 million rows in AR schema :
select owner , table_name,to_char(num_rows,'999,999,999') ,last_analyzed
from dba_tables
where owner = 'AR'
and num_rows > 10000000
order by num_rows desc nulls last
AR AR_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL 408,567,520 04/02/2012 11:49:57
AR RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST_ALL 380,513,830 04/02/2012 13:54:12
AR MLOG$_AR_CASH_RECEIPTS_ALL 310,777,690 04/02/2012 12:30:33
AR RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES_ALL 260,211,090 04/02/2012 13:30:26
AR AR_RECEIVABLE_APPLICATIONS_ALL 166,834,930 04/02/2012 12:16:54
AR MLOG$_RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL 150,962,980 04/02/2012 12:33:23
AR AR_CASH_RECEIPT_HISTORY_ALL 145,737,410 04/02/2012 11:40:31
AR RA_CUST_TRX_LINE_SALESREPS_ALL 130,287,580 04/02/2012 14:03:54
AR AR_PAYMENT_SCHEDULES_ALL 108,652,480 04/02/2012 12:05:32
AR RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL 55,540,740 04/02/2012 12:41:56
AR AR_CASH_RECEIPTS_ALL 53,182,340 04/02/2012 11:29:53
AR AR_DOC_SEQUENCE_AUDIT 52,865,150 04/02/2012 11:52:46
AR RA_MC_TRX_LINE_GL_DIST 17,317,730 04/02/2012 14:05:18
AR AR_MC_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL 13,037,030 04/02/2012 11:53:35
AR AR_MC_RECEIVABLE_APPS 12,672,050 04/02/2012 11:53:57
AR AR_TRX_SUMMARY 12,457,560 04/02/2012 12:20:16
AR RA_CUST_RECEIPT_METHODS 11,105,750 04/02/2012 13:35:38
AR HZ_ORGANIZATION_PROFILES 10,271,640 04/02/2012 12:24:44
How to Upgrade AR tables whith Huge amount of Datas ( > 50 Millions Rows ) ?

Hi,
Dont worry, you are not the only one even we have one customer whose AR_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL table is 80 GB now and i can even do select count(*) for this table.
We had to keep this much data for business requirements, but i wonder if this is a bug or users mistake.
Due to this we are facing seruios performance issues for AR reports and raised SRs but no resolution yet. And this guy who is assigned to us is reall ynot been helpful to fix the issue.
Although we did not upgrade for this customer, but we migrated from 11.5.9 to R12.1.1 by re-implementation. But all these increasing size of these tables happened after migration.
And i believe most of the time in your upgrade is going to building the indexes. You can ask Oracle if they can edit the driver file to skip building the indxes and rebuild them after upgrade. But again it will also take time.
Another option for you is to "Archive and Purge the data" as per chapter 10 of
11i Receivables user guide.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B25284_01/current/acrobat/115arug.zip
Thanks
Edited by: EBSDBA on Feb 8, 2012 10:04 PM

LDAP issue after upgrading to SP15 from SP7 for CUP 5.3

Hello,
We have recently upgraded our Sandbox from SP 7 to SP15 on GRC 5.3 and Now having issues authenticating users using LDAP.
The connections and settings are exactly same as our Dev system which in on SP7 and the connection also says successful but when we go onto the request page and type in an id it says invalid credentials.
Am i missing something or is there a special procedure after upgrade .
Thanks
Uday

Hello Frank,
Thanks for the reply.I forgot to do it and as you said once i performed those steps it actually solved my password reset link issues as it was erroring out with 500 error and now it is working fine .
But to fix LDAP issue SAP has a note which says after SP13 we don't need to fill in the user path field while creating LDAP connector.
Thanks
Uday

SCOM : Issues while upgrading SCOM agent from 2012SP1 to R2

Hi,
We have upgraded SCOM setup from SP1 to R2 but facing issues with agent upgrade.
We were able to view only ~70% agents in pending management (Agent requires update).
Further, when I tried to upgrade agents through console, some are successfully upgraded but rest are giving
error.
Can someone help me to understand why all agents are not appearing in pending management for upgrade?
I also tried to upgrade agent manually but no luck. It gives error "The path 'C:\Windows\.........\monagent.msi'
can not be found. Verify that you have access to location and try again or try to find installation package.........". , though I had logged into server with admin access.
Also most of servers are remotely manageable but unable to upgrade through console.
Thanks,
Priya

Hi Priya,
I understand you require the Agent data. How ever the events clearely say the issue is because of the old installation files.
I was looking a a article on updating an agent to SCOM 2012 R2 from the below link.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn249715.aspx
So the link says:
When you upgrade an agent, the Operations Manager installer service runs and is not removed until after the completion of the upgrade.
If the agent upgrade fails, you might have to re-install the agent because the installer service was not properly removed. If you attempt to upgrade the agent again and it fails, you should re-install the agent after you have completed upgrading all features
of Operations Manager.
So i would suggest you is you try the below on only 1 agent.
1. Download the Agent Dump from the below link and try updating it. (This is my copy of MOM Agent.msi from my installation media of SCOM
2012 R2)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/wv7y37moyd04209/MOMAgent.msi?dl=0
If the above does not success and gives you the same error then try the below
1. Select an agent and pull all the perfmon data / Alerting data required for it using SQL Query or Reporting.
2. Uninstall the Old SP1 Agent setup.
3. Install the Agent via Discovery Wizard or do a manual installation and see if the issue resolves.
I think either from both the steps will solve the issue.
Gautam.75801

Issues with Upgrade to WebTools 6 SP01 PL02

Hi everyone,
I just wanted to check and see if anyone else had issues with the upgrade to the latest and greatest patch of Webtools SP01 PL02. I tried last night and ran into 3 major errors:
1. I received an error related to npdatepicker that it exists in two different DLL's. I validated that all dll's were updated, but continued to receive this error.
2. When trying to place the order, I received an error that the credit card was invalid. I could not get past this screen. I was not even using a credit card for the Order, it was going "On Account", but would not let me place the order. I didn't see that I needed to change anything for processing credit cards and it worked fine in the previous version.
3. All Order Confirmations were re-sent, back from the beginning of time. Now, usually I turn that off, which I did, but I rebooted the machine and it kicked off the message service, but why would all of the orders be re-sent? The flags should not have flipped during the upgrade.
I am going to submit a ticket for all of these issues, but was just wondering if anyone else ran into these problems. Please let me know, your help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Kristen

Yes, it is tied to NoAuthorization. HOLD ON... Sorry, this was not tied to NoAuthorization, it was tied to something else, but not sure why. There were two On Accounts and one was set properly and the other wasn't. Now if I can get through the below issue then I can test if it works now. Please let me know and THANKS!
Also, here is the error message I get when I go to the verify.aspx page. I cannot get past this.
Description: An error occurred during the compilation of a resource required to service this request. Please review the following specific error details and modify your source code appropriately.
Compiler Error Message: CS0433: The type 'ASP.common_controls_npdatepicker_ascx' exists in both 'c:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\Temporary ASP.NET Files\root\a9532086\c270f6d6\App_Web_1n7f-byx.dll' and 'c:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\Temporary ASP.NET Files\root\a9532086\c270f6d6\App_Web_npdatepicker.ascx.47615e8b.y2b2hvwm.dll'
Source Error:
[No relevant source lines]
Source File: c:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\Temporary ASP.NET Files\root\a9532086\c270f6d6\App_Web_verify.aspx.8e27a128.0jrnb1wh.0.cs Line: 477
Edited by: Kristen Faison on Apr 20, 2009 7:00 PM

Issues with upgrading Hyperion HFM from 11.1.2 to 11.1.2.1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for