It's possible to test scenario without sending out mesg?

Hi all,
We can test the Scenarios in ID by Test Configuration tool.
Whether this message can seen in integration Monitoring
SXMB_MONI ? i'm not able to find it.
is their any other way to test the scenario using XML payload and to get the message in SXMB_MONI i.e INTEGRATION SERVER.
i also found in RUNTIME workbench there is option of TEST MESSAGE here also i've sent the message by inserting the payload in the payload editor , but i'm not able to find any logs .
is their any other ways ,please guide me.
regards
Nandan

Hi,
this is the default url while in test message editor
http://dewall31.ccss.capgemini.com:50100/MessagingSystem/receive/AFW/XI
for this it's displaying message is successful,but unavailable in monitoring
If change to below entry it's displaying HTTP 404 code url not found
http://dewall31.ccss.capgemini.com:50100//sap/xi/engine?type=entry
what could be the reason?
Thanks in Advance
Nandan

Similar Messages

SOAP scenario without sender SOAP channel

Hi Experts,
I am developing a scenario of SOAP to JDBC.
Here my test data is coming from Altova Spy for sender SOAP side.
I have configured the scenario without sender SOAP channel, and sender agreement.
But while sending the SOAP message I am getting the error as data cannot be posted.
Can anybody please tell me, whether is it possible to have such configuration without SOAP sender channel.
And if yes, then what would be the URL that I have to give for posting the data.
Awaiting your reply.
Regards,
Supriya Sawant.

I have gone throgh this Note.
But now I m getting this error:
<SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
 <SOAP:Header>
</SOAP:Header>
 <SOAP:Body>
 <SOAP:Fault xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
 <faultcode>SOAP:Client</faultcode>
 <faultstring>Error during parsing of SOAP header</faultstring>
 <faultactor>http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30</faultactor>
 <detail>
 <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
 <SAP:Category>XIProtocol</SAP:Category>
 <SAP:Code area="PARSER">ITEM_MISSING</SAP:Code>
 <SAP:P1>Header</SAP:P1>
 <SAP:P2/>
 <SAP:P3/>
 <SAP:P4/>
 <SAP:AdditionalText/>
 <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace=""/>
 <SAP:Stack>XML element Header missing in SOAP message header (SAP XI Extension)
</SAP:Stack>
 </SAP:Error>
 </detail>
 </SOAP:Fault>
 </SOAP:Body>
</SOAP:Envelope>

Is it possible to recieve imessages without sending them?

My phone plan has unlimited texting but an extremely finite amount of data, so to save money I prefer to send and recieve sms text messages rather than imessages. Initially I had imessages completely turned off, but since I couldn't recieve imessages people thought that I was ignoring them when I wasn't. I just never got there imessage. (Why the stupid imessage system wouldn't change the message to sms or at least inform the sender that the message couldn't be recieved is annoying and a whole other problem, but I digress.) So I turned my imessages back on, but the dilemma of not wanting to waste my data by sending imessages still remains, and now every text I start wants to send as an imessage. So I ask my question: Is it possible to recieve imessages without sending them?
On a related note, is it also possible to retrieve imessages that were sent to, but you never recieved because you had imessages turned off?
Thanks! I really appreciate your help.

Does anyone no anything about this? Thanks!

Test Marketing Campaign for all business partners, without sending out

Hi,
within the application it is possible to test Mail Forms to a manually entered e-Mail address, for Business Partner or Marketing Prospect, checking conditions and if appropriate using Campaign. This works fine.
For quality reasons, my customer wants to check the whole campaign, by using all business partners in the target groups used and all the conditions checked, BUT not sending out any e-Mail. Do you have made experiences on how to resolve this requirement?
Many thanks for sharing your experiences.
Regards,
Markus

You can have the BASIS team look at the SMTP and SAP Connect settings. They can setup parameters here that will restrict e-mails from going out of CRM (usually that's what is done in the Dev and Test environments), even though they are initiated.
You can check that the e-mails are initiated for the list of BP's in transactions SOST and SCOT. The basis team (or anyone having authorizations) can manually push out all or individual e-mails if you want to test the complete flow (with a list of test e-mail id's linked to test BP's).
Let me know if you have any specific questions with this process.
Thanks,
Kalyan

How do I test a scenario without getting the other party involved

Hi,
How do I test a scenario without getting the other party involved?
I have created a scenario to receive information from an external system (Remedy), processing through a SoapAdapter into SAP to create a service order. How can I send a sample of information in order for me to test my scenario without asking the Remedy people to transmit data all the time?
Thanks in advance,
Leanne

hi Leanne,
have a look at my weblog:
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/08/25/xi-sending-a-message-without-the-use-of-an-adapter-not-possible
it shows how to use the test tab from RWB
to send test messages
Regards,
michal

DIO Pass or Fail Tests: LabVIEW would have to determine the expected result or results (1 or 2 of a possible 25) based on the output pattern send out (1 of 65K).

I am trying to come up with a plan to write a LabVIEW VI to do the following test. Can you give me a few ideas how to do this in LabVIEW. I am a new to LabView. I think I how to read and write I/O ports and do comparisons. I need a little guidance on the error checking. In simple terms the test will go like this:
I have 16 digital inputs and 16 outputs.
The 16 outputs are turned on in a specific pattern (i.e. 1001000101011101) and then the 16 inputs (i.e. 1000101111111111) are read in after a time delay. The inputs are checked to see if they match the expected results. If they do it's a pass if not it's a f
ailure. This seems pretty straightforward. And I think I have an idea how to do it. Here's the problem. The inputs are changed sequentially so that all possible combinations are tried. The test needs to determine if the resulting input pattern is correct based on the outputs that were sent out. 16 outputs give 65K possible tests. For each tests there would be 1 or 2 possible results with a total of 25 results for the entire 65K possible tests. LabVIEW would have to determine the expected result or results (1 or 2 of the 25) based on the output pattern send out (1 of 65K). Then it would have to compare the actual input pattern received to see if it's a pass or fail?
Any ideas how I can approach this?

The 16 outputs are simulating inputs to the device under test, (simulating remote switches and contacts). The object of the test is to test every possible combination to ensure that nothing unexpected happens at the output. The device under test is a logic motor control system and we want to make sure (among other things) that we don’t start or stop the motor when its not suppose to. How can only two tests do that?
I think you are describing how to create an array with the results. But I still don’t know how to determine what the result should be and if it is correct.
I’ve identified 25 possible valid states the motor controller can be in.
I’ve also identified the correct outputs that determine each of the 25 states.
I’ve also
identified the possible valid states you can go to from each (previous) state, You can only get to a valid new state from a previous state if the right combination of inputs is applied (we hope).
If you know what state you are in when start and you know the valid states you can go to and the inputs required to get there, you should be able test the system against that. You verify this by checking the outputs against what they should be. With 65K possible inputs combination, checking them all manually would be quite is a task. Putting this into LabView is my task.

Test for Stream Without Sending to Sound Card?

Is there a way to verify that Adobe Flash Player is actually transmitting a stream without sending the stream to the sound card?
I want to test whether there is an active stream in a ms-dos batch program.
I am running WinXP SP3, Firefox 12.0 or Internet Explorer 8.0, Adobe Flash Player 11.
TIA.

Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately, the free version of NetLimiter only lets you observe the traffic, not limit it.
I'm not quite ready to purchase the Pro version of the application that may not work for me.
Basically, I am trying to find an automated way to switch from a backup radio source to my primary source if the primary radio source is working. Also, I want to confirm that the primary source is working without having two stations playing concurrently. Additionally, I don't want to switch back to the primary radio source if it is still down. The switching part is easy, but not sniffing (without playing) the primary source.
Unfortunately, as far as I know, Adobe Flash Player doesn't provide a means for selecting an alternate audio output.
Is there another application that allows sniffing of Adobe Flash Player audio without also playing the audio to the live audio output?

Error handling in File - XI - SOAP scenario without BPM

Hello!
We have a File -> XI -> SOAP scenario without BPM. The problem is that if the Web Service sends back an error XI tries to reprocess the same message again and again instead of taking the next one.
We do not want set the retry interval to NULL because most error cases are temporary connection problems and then also those messages would not automatically be reprocessed any more.
We also have to use BE instead of EO, otherwise the Web Service will not return a response. But we need the response to be sure that the processing was successful. The message volume in this scenario is quite high and we do not want to use BPM only for the error handling.
I know that from SP19 some additional adapter modules are available for async - sync scenarios without BPM. I tried to configure it like described in File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19. but it did not solve the problem. Does anybody have any other ideas? Thanks.
Regards, Tanja

Hi Tanja,
>>>The volume is 3000 messages/day on business days and 700 messages/day during weekends but the traffic will increase in the future
I think, you should check that out. It is assumedly only 2 days work to build a scenario:
IDoc -> BP
BP <-> SOAP/HTTP
BP -> IDoc (Acknowledgement)
In the process you need a condition branch, where you decide success or not. You need 2 Interface Mappings for filling the ALEAUD.
Just send 1000 IDocs to the Test-XI and look to performance monitoring at Runtime Workbench, to find out, how many message will be processed in one hour. Assumedly 3000 and more per day should be possible. The advantage would be to reduce number of systems (no file system) and messages (better monitoring) and using the standard (better maintenance).
>>>So you are suggesting I should use HTTP adapter and then add the SOAP header manually in a mapping?
Yes, build the SOAP envelop during the mapping. Most easy is to use XSL or, if your mapping is ready, an additionsal XSL. You can put the error into the Acknowledgement to see it in ERP transaction WE02.
Filling of ALEAUD fields:
E1ADHDR/MESTYP: original message type
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/DOCNUM: original IDoc number
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/STATUS: 68 in case of error, 53 in case of success
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/STATXT: Short description for R/3 user what has happend
I ve done such a scenario several times. That works without any problems.
Regards,
Udo

Problem with File RFC File scenario without using BPM

Hi all,
I am trying a File RFC File scenario without using BPM with the help of the following thread:
File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.
The XI system is PI 7.0 sp 12. When I am trying to acheive the above scenario, I am getting wierd results i.e., when I observe in SXI_MONITOR, the message is showing as processed successfully, but when I watch the message status in communication channel monitoring, I am getting the following error:
"Attempt to process file failed with com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.CPAException: Couldn't retrieve inbound binding for the given P/S/A values: FP=;TP=;FS=DEV120;TS=Test_Service;AN=MI_Invoice;ANS=urn:sap.com:test;"
I am not able to understand what the problem is. By the way, one more thing, is, I have kept the File processing mode as "Delete" in the sender file adapter. But the file is not getting deleted. I think the reason could be because of the above error.
Can any body help me out in getting my problem resolved?
Thanks,
Adithya K

CPA Cache Refresh from the Adapter Engine To trigger a cache refresh from the individual Adapter Framework, open a browser window and enter the following
URL: http://<host>:<port>/CPACache/refresh?mode=delta|full
The Monitoring url is like this: http://<host>:<port>/CPACache
Thanks & Regards,
Farooq.

Testing RFC without Executing RFC in SAP R/3

Hi All,
Is it possible to test a sender RFC adapter to invoke Web service in SAP XI without executing RFC in R/3. I am facing problems when executing RFC in R/3. So would like to confirm that the other portion ie, from XI to Webservice is working fine. Any help would be much appreciated.
Thx
Deno

Hi Deno,
Just go in a stepwise manner and you will know here the error is.
1. First execute RFC and see if it reaches SAP XI.
2. Check in Transaction SXMB_MONI as to which step is going into error.
3. If it's not reaching XI ythen there is problem with RFC destination or the RFC adapter config check that.
Regards
Vijaya

Is it possible to test XI Adapter on PCK by JNDI lookup?

Hi, friends
I can't test the XI Adapter by using the communication channels and sender/receiver agreements on a standalone PCK (without XI server to be connected). Is it possible to test XI Adapter on PCK by JNDI lookup?
I can locate the XI Adapter by JNDI lookup (JNDI name is configured on SampleRA.xml):
ConnectionFactory cxf = (ConnectionFactory)initctx.lookup("deployedAdapters/sample_ra/shareable/sample_ra");
But later it failed to get the ConnectionSpec and create the Connection. Could anyone give me a sample code for testing XI Adapter by JNDI lookup?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Jason
Message was edited by: Jason Wang

Hi,
I'm not sure if this is what you are looking for but
check the link "Using Resource Adapter to Obtain Connection" on this site:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/de/89/b262427a65423f87706a0e3faea00d/frameset.htm
Hope it helps,
Christian

Empty document found. Proceed without sending message

Hi All,
I have a file CC and it works fine , simple file.
But when I add Trailer to it... then I have no output file..Instead the CC channel shows that the document is empty and cannot proceed:
Here is the details ( Watch the Trailer added)
ZOUT_MT 11 -ZIN_MT 11
Recordset 1--1
Rec 1unboundedTest01 1-----unbounded
key(string) 1...1----
key 1..1(string)
name11(string) 1..1----
name21 1..1(string)
name12(string) 1..1----
name22 1..1(string)
Trail 1...1 -
Trail 1---1
key(string) 1..1 -
key 1..1(string)
test(string) 1...1 -
test1..1 (string)
In Config: Sender File CC
Doc Name :ZOUT_MT
Doc namspace : http://mytest.com/test1
RecordsetName : Recordset
Recordset Structure : Rec,*,Trail,1
Key Field Name : key
Recordset per message : 1
Rec.fieldNames : key,name11,name12
Rec.fieldSeparator : ,
Rec.endSeparator : 'nl'
Rec.processConfiguration: FromConfiguration
Rec.keyFieldValue : 1
Trail.fieldNames: key,test
Trail.endSeparator: 'nl'
Trail.processConfiguration : FromConfiguration
Trail.keyFieldValue : 1
Trail.fieldSeparator : ,
From all this work above , when I put the file having:
1,111,112
1,222,223
1,333,334
1,99
The output file in empty (null)...
Does anyone out there understand why the output file is becoming null..
here is the log I get in workbecnh (commuunication channel)
Audit Log for Message: c1a434f5-ad9f-4a26-08c1-e7d579a5927a
Time Stamp Status Description
21.01.2009 11:48:22 Success Channel ztest_sender_cc: Entire file content converted to XML format
21.01.2009 11:48:22 Warning Channel ztest_sender_cc: Empty document found. Proceed without sending message
21.01.2009 11:48:22 Success File "/mylocation/interface/SCM/somefolder/in/shilpagirlsinput.txt" deleted after processing

keyFieldValue must be different for Rec and Trail, keyfield is to distinguish Rec and Trail, their value must be different, otherwise how can you tell which record is Rec, and which is Trail?
Try to put different keyfield value, chang the input file and run the scenario.
Also because you specified cardinality 1...1 for Trail element, and 1 is used as keyfield for Rec, XI thinks there is no Trail in the outbound file, thus it produces empty document warning as Trail is required to be present by cardinality 1...1
Jayson

Message Split -- File to Idoc Scenario - ( Without BPM )

I have multiple records coming to XI in a File and I have to create Multiple Idocs to R/3.
Due to Complexity of mapping I'm splitting Maaping step into 2 message Mappings.
A-->B
B-->C
In the 2nd Mapping step I'm doing message Split meaning for each Source record I'm creating multiple Idocs ( To be precise each record on the source becomes 4 idocs in the Target.
2nd Mapping step is as follows
Source 1..1
Sourcerecord 0.. Unbounded
 field1 0..1
 field2 0..1
 filed3 0..1
Target
Message 1
 Idoc 1.. Unbounded
 Idoc Structure..
Message 2
 Idoc 1.. Unbounded
Message 3
 Idoc 1.. Unbounded
Message 4
 Idoc 1.. Unbounded
So based on some criteria each record of Source will be mapped to 4 Messages ( 1 each under each Message )
Is it possible to do this without BPM?. Iam sending all these Idocs to same R/3 System.
Thanks for any help..RK

Hi,
See the blog
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
Basicly we have 2 ways of handling such scenarios:
- we can use a block step and send multiple IDOCs from our BPM
- we can also do a little trick and send multiple IDOCs from the XI without a BPM
The first approach is a standard XI approach. It involves the use of a BPM
so the speed of this transfer many not be very good in case you'd like to send
hundreds or thousands of IDOCs in just one call.
The second approach uses a little trick that was mentioned several times
on the XI Froum by a number of XI developers but is still not very clear to the XI newbies.
It allows us to send multiple IDOCs without the use of a BPM. Most probably this will be your choice
if you'd like to use such 1:N (IDOCs) scenarios effectively.
Please see the bwlow threads also..
IDOC Splitting
File To IDOC Thru XI
Multi-Mappings in BPM (XI 3.0)
Please let me know , your prob..is solcev or not..
Regards
Chilla..

FCC problem: Empty document found. Proceed without sending message

Hi all,
I am doing FCC to FCC scenario.
In that I am getting the following message in Communication channel Monitoring.
Channel CC_File_FILBAS009_Sender: Entire file content converted to XML format
Channel CC_File_FILBAS009_Sender: Empty document found. Proceed without sending message
File "/temp/xidelivery/send/FILBAS009_input.txt" archived after processing
and My File structure is as follows..
RS
-HEADER
Field1
Field2
Field3
-DATA
Field4
Field5
Field6
-TRAILER
Field7
Field8
Field9
FCC Parameters are:
RecordsetName : RS
HEADER.fieldFixedLengths : 5,1,5
HEADER.fieldNames : Field1,Field2,Field3
HEADER.keyFieldName : Field2
HEADER.keyFieldValue : 'H'
HEADER.endSeparator : 'nl'
In the same way I gave conversion parameters to DATA and TRAILER also.
Can any one tell me what is the problem?
Regards,
Pavani

hi pavani,
excuse me about my previous reply.
I was just checking your FCC parameters. I see fieldseparator missing and also is it possible to paste sample input data.
I fieldsepartor is also not necessary since you have fiexedlengths. Since you say FCC to FCC and you paste the receiver FCC parameters
regards
Ramesh P
Message was edited by:
 Ramesh P

Verification of recvr file channel configuration without sending a message

Hi,
We need to test the configuration((such as directory, filename etc.,) of a receiver file channel. As we all know, in the case of sender channel, since it will keep polling the directory configured, if there is any incorrect directory, it will be indicated in the run time work bench, EVEN IF THE MESSAGE HAS NOt GONE THROUGH THE SENDER FILE CHANNEL. However in the case of receiver file channels, UNLESS THE MESSAGE GOES THROUGH THE RECEIVER FILE CHANNEL, we won't be able to identify the incorrect directory configuration.
Thus, please let me know as to how to identify the incorrect directory configuration in the case of RECEIVER FILE CHANNELS, without sending any message through the same.
I appreciate your early response.
Regards
Venkat

Hi,
AFAIK you can check whether the channel is Started/ Stopped (in RWB), check whether correct parameters are filled in the CC (by visual inspection)....but unless and until you test the scenario you may not know whether the CC is properly working or not....somethimes there is a case that you are asked to pay for each and every message that is sent using XI...is this your case?....if not then you can go ahead and test it end-to-end as Dharamveer said.....
If you get the solution (as you need) then dont forget to share with us
Regards,
Abhishek.

It's possible to test scenario without sending out mesg?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for