JPG resolution and quality

Dear Indesign scripters,
I'm having a very old script what I made for CS2 and still using for CS5.
Now I'm having trouble to give it the option to choose the resolution in a dialog box.
Know I'm typing the resolution manually in the script but I’m wondering if there is a way to do it with a dialog box.
var myDoc = app.documents[0];
app.scriptPreferences.version = "6.0"
if(app.documents.length != 0){  
     var myFolder = Folder.selectDialog ("Choose a Folder");  
     if(myFolder != null){  
          myExportPages(myFolder);  
else{  
     alert("Please open a document and try again.");  
function myExportPages(myFolder){  
     var myDocument = app.activeDocument;  
     var myDocumentName = myDocument.name;  
app.jpegExportPreferences.resolution = 150;
app.jpegExportPreferences.jpegQuality = JPEGOptionsQuality.MAXIMUM;
// JPEGOptionsQuality.LOW, JPEGOptionsQuality.MEDIUM, JPEGOptionsQuality.HIGH, JPEGOptionsQuality.MAXIMUM
app.jpegExportPreferences.jpegExportRange = ExportRangeOrAllPages.exportRange;
app.scriptPreferences.version = "7.0"
app.jpegExportPreferences.jpegColorSpace = JpegColorSpaceEnum.RGB;
app.scriptPreferences.version = "6.0"
app.activeDocument.sections.everyItem().includeSectionPrefix = false;
p = app.activeDocument.pages.everyItem().getElements();
for (i = 0; i < p.length; i++)
f = File (myFolder + "/" + p[i].textFrames.item ('labelcode').contents + ".jpg");
app.jpegExportPreferences.pageString = p[i].name;
app.activeDocument.exportFile (ExportFormat.jpg, f );
alert('Done!');
Already thanks for the help.
Greetings.

Try the below code,
If you want to create UI, Peter Kahrel documentation will be very useful for you.
http://www.kahrel.plus.com/indesign/scriptui.html
var myDoc = app.documents[0];
app.scriptPreferences.version = "6.0"
if(app.documents.length != 0){  
     var myFolder = Folder.selectDialog ("Choose a Folder");  
     if(myFolder != null){  
          myExportPages(myFolder);  
else{  
     alert("Please open a document and try again.");  
function myExportPages(myFolder){  
     var myDocument = app.activeDocument;  
     var myDocumentName = myDocument.name;  
var w = new Window ("dialog", "Resolution Dialog");
var e = w.add ("edittext", undefined, "type your resolution here");
w.layout.layout();
e.active = true;
w.add ("button", undefined, "OK");
w.show();
app.jpegExportPreferences.resolution = Number(e.text);
app.jpegExportPreferences.jpegQuality = JPEGOptionsQuality.MAXIMUM;
// JPEGOptionsQuality.LOW, JPEGOptionsQuality.MEDIUM, JPEGOptionsQuality.HIGH, JPEGOptionsQuality.MAXIMUM
app.jpegExportPreferences.jpegExportRange = ExportRangeOrAllPages.exportRange;
app.scriptPreferences.version = "7.0"
app.jpegExportPreferences.jpegColorSpace = JpegColorSpaceEnum.RGB;
app.scriptPreferences.version = "6.0"
app.activeDocument.sections.everyItem().includeSectionPrefix = false;
p = app.activeDocument.pages.everyItem().getElements();
for (i = 0; i < p.length; i++)
f = File (myFolder + "/" + p[i].textFrames.item ('labelcode').contents + ".jpg");
app.jpegExportPreferences.pageString = p[i].name;
app.activeDocument.exportFile (ExportFormat.jpg, f );
alert('Done!');
Vandy

Similar Messages

  • NEED HELP WITH RESOLUTION AND QUALITY?

    hi guys
    i have been making these vector type portraits in photoshop for the last couple weeks, it has all been going well until, when some one puts it up as a display picture on facebook etc the quality is not as good as when i just view the picture on my computer.
    i have been starting the new in photoshop and using 800x800 pixels and the res at 72 pixels/inch, am i going wrong here some where? or is it the fact that i am using photoshop to do this task? im sure there are a lot of people that will advise me to use illustrator, which i have been thinking about doing. but i would like to know if this can be solved in photoshop first.
    thanks in advance for your help
    it is slightly pixel-ish in areas...
    P.S. i have also notice it is work in the text "faulty" area.

    so let me try get this straight lol the picture on the left is on facebook and that the quality is rubbish because its on facebook? 
    because when i opened the one on the right just to look at it, the quality was the same as when it was in photoshop.
    they are both obviously jpg, so it has to be the fact that it is showing from facebook that makes it grainy, right?

  • Integrated isight Resolution and Quality.

    Hello,
    I-ve just bought ( it arrived yesterday ) a brand new Mac Book Pro woth 2,8 Ghz 4 Mb of Ram and so on...
    I've been playing around with it a bit just to know my new computer and i noticed the bad quality of the image of the webcam...
    It only takes pictures at at the resolution of 640x420 pixel... ( I've also tryed with other program than photo Both )... when I go to check the hardware it says...
    Built-in iSight:
    Product ID: 0x8507
    Vendor ID: 0x05ac (Apple Inc.)
    Version: 4.19
    Serial Number: 8H9C7007F6V23L00
    Speed: Up to 480 Mb/sec
    Manufacturer: Apple Inc.
    Location ID: 0x24400000
    Current Available (mA): 500
    Current Required (mA): 500
    I've read on internet that the
    Product ID: 0x8507
    It's an old webcm.. is it possible on a brand new computer??
    Shouldn't I have a 1.3 Mpx camera??
    Thank you for your attention.
    Message was edited by: Sp1ke85

    Mark Cockram wrote:
    I would like to add to this question. I purchased an MBP 13 2.53 manuf June 2009 and a MB manuf oct 2009. When I use skype i see people in gloriuous widescreen but everyone sees me in only 4;3 with black bars down either side. Can anyone explain why this is the case. Do I have an inferior camera?
    Thanks
    mark
    It seems to me that you have found a software feature (limit?) of Skype for Mac, Mark.
    This Skype Help page states, in part, that Skype's "High Quality Video will transmit video images at 640x480 resolution at up to 30 frames per second."
      http://tinyurl.com/y89568y
    640 x 480 is normal (4x3) screen format, not a widescreen one. Moreover, according to this Skype Help page:
      http://tinyurl.com/yz8nezk
    Skype's "Standard Video" offers a resolution of up to 320X240 pixels (QVGA) at 15 frames per second (fps). 320x240 is also a normal (4x3) screen format.
    Based on this info directly from Skype, although your preview monitor image on your Mac may be showing your webcam's full widescreen capability, it appears that neither video quality level in Skype for Mac can transmit widescreen images to your contacts.
    IF you have other Skype-specific questions, you may get better and faster help from Skype Help
      http://www.skype.com/help/guides/
    if you do not not get the answers you need here in this Apple forum. The users who post in the dedicated Skype Community Forums linked in the Skype Help pages may have already answered your Skype related questions for their own use.
    See http://share.skype.com/sites/mac/video/ for some examples of more Mac related video info.
    EZ Jim
    Mac Pro Quad Core (Early 2009) 2.93Ghz w/Mac OS X (10.6.2)  MacBook Pro (13 inch, Mid 2009) 2.26GHz (10.6.2)
    LED Cinema Display  G4 PowerBook 1.67GHz (10.4.11)  iBookSE 366MHz (10.3.9)  External iSight

  • I upload iPhone pics to Shutterfly, which gives me a "low resolution" warning and blurry prints. Does anyone know how to enhance resolution/printing quality of iPhone pictures? iPhone 5

    i upload iPhone pics to Shutterfly, which gives me a "low resolution" warning and blurry prints. Does anyone know how to enhance resolution/printing quality of iPhone pictures?
    iPhone 5

    How does iPhoto play a part in this?  You're in the iPhoto forum.  Shouldn't you be asking your question in the iPhone forum?  I'll ask the powers to be to move you question to the iPhone forum.
    OT

  • Anybody know what resolution and KBPS quality apple use in their SD movies?

    I want to digitize some of my movies into the MP4 format so I can watch it on my apple tv.
    this is mostly children tv (thomas tank engine and so on). problem with dvd's is that we need to change often and they get worn. children do change their mind very often.
    so, a digitized version in my Apple tv would be nice.
    I Use DVD FAB 5.
    but when it comes to the kbps setting what should I choose?
    I think that I can use the same setting as Apple them self. I bought walle movie and that was 1.1 GB and had very nice look.
    anybody know what resolution and KBPS quality apple use in their SD movies?

    anybody know what resolution and KBPS quality apple use in their SD movies?
    They are generally encoded at 1500 Kbps for video and 128 Kbps for audio and a resolution of 640 x 480 depending on the aspect ratio.
    The ToU of this forum forbid discussion about circumventing copy protection, so I'm not willing to comment on the rest of your question.
    http://discussions.apple.com/help.jspa#terms

  • Adobe X PDF files converted to jpg, edited and converted back to PDF have ragged, unclear text.  I didn't have this problem with Acrobat 9 standard.  What is the remedy for this.  If this is the best I can expect, I won't be able to use X standard.

    Adobe X PDF files converted to jpg, edited and converted back to PDF have ragged, unclear text.  I didn't have this problem with Acrobat 9 standard.  What is the remedy for this.  If this is the best I can expect, I won't be able to use X standard.

    I can't imagine any worse workflow than converting to JPEG to edit text, then back to PDF. Text in a PDF is a vector thing, smooth at all resolutions. And JPEG is made for photos. EVERY conversion to JPEG and back loses quality but how much loss there is will vary.
    If you must go to an image format, try PNG.

  • Batch change jpg resolution in Photoshop Elements!

    Hello,
    I have a group of photos that I have to resize (pixels and resolution) properly. The requirement is ridiculous.
    Per Microsoft Office 365 (profile picture sync from our servers)
    100x100 pixels
    10 kb in size (yes, that is 10 as in ten)
    Anything above those parameters wont sync
    100x100 pixels was an easy batch conversion process using Photoshop Essentials
    Brought my photo sizes between 40-60kb
    I was also able to reduce the resolution to 72 dpi, which got me down to about 20-25kb per photo
    I can manually adjust the resolution down to 50 dpi and that gets me just under 10kb, but I cant find a way to do it in batch.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks

    You can run the image processor File>Scripts>Image Processor
    However, I believe that the IP will function same as a Save As, where you set the JPG quality on a scale of 1 -12, unlike the 1 - 100 in Save for Web.  But you could play around with Save As until you found the quality number between 1 - 12 that got the output you wanted, and then run all images through the IP.  Make sure to click "Convert profile to sRGB".
    Otherwise, you could make an action that runs a single photo through Save for Web with the resizing and quality you want.  Then you run the Image Processor, and at the bottom you can choose to run your action.

  • How to improve JPG Resolution in FCP importing from PowerPoint?

    Hi.  I've successfully saved my PowerPoint presentation as a folder full of JPG files and imported that folder into Final Cut Pro.  But when I drop these jpg's into the timeline and export the project to .mov, the result is pixelated images, low-quality text and terrible looking photographs embedded into the PowerPoint slides that looked good in PowerPoint.
    At what point do I adjust the resolution?  Where and how do I do that?
    Using PowerPoint 2008 for Mac version 12.2
    FCP 6.0.6
    MacBook Pro OS X 10.5.8
    Thanks!
    Roxane

    Dear Nick Holmes,
    Thanks for your highly technical explanations!
    May I trouble you for further detail?
    > DV is a highly compressed codec. Work in a ProRes timeline instead.
    "DV"?  Digital video?  How do I "work in a ProRes timeline"?  Is that a setting in FCP?
    >Dpi is a print concept, it means nothing in video. In the NTSC TV format, you only ever have 720x480 pixels, regardless of screen size.
    Very good to know and understand.
    >Set your Field Dominance to None.
    Please tell me where to find this function.
    >Fully render the Sequence.
    Don't judge quality based on what you see in the Canvas -it's a low res proxy used to show the flow of your story.
    I'm looking at the exported .mov in Quicktime.
    >Your export codec will be determined by the playback mechanism. A DVD is highly compressed. If you can playback from your computer it can stay in ProRes.
    Should I dig around for an LCD projector adaptor that undoubtedly came with my MacBook Pro?  Or is that something I'll have to purchase?
    >You might consider rebuilding the slides to better suit video playback -avoid small Serif typfaces, for example.
    Rebuild them in PowerPoint, you mean?
    Thanks!
    Rx

  • T430 1600x900 i5 Core: Mini DisplayPort To HDMI 1920x1080 TV Resolution And Sizing-Overscan Problems

    Hello, and thanks in advance for any help.  Also, my apologies if these issues have been previously resolved; I've spent 2 days searching for answers and none of my effort has resulted in a solution, either here or elsewhere.  
    I very recently for the first time connected my ThinkPad T430 2344-5GU (i5 core, native screen resolution 1600x900, Intel HD 4000 v9.17.10.2843, NVIDIA Optimus NVS 5400M v9.18.13.1100) to a Panasonic HD TV (native screen resolution 1920x1080) using a Mini DisplayPort to HDMI connector, with the hope of playing 1080p movies on my laptop while watching them on the TV.  This seemingly worked fine at first--both audio and video were present--but I quickly noticed that the image on the TV was, very slightly, larger than the image on the laptop screen (cutting off roughly 5% of the image on each of the 4 sides) and that the resolution wasn't 1920x1080.  So I hunted for a solution.  
    Windows display properties were no help.  In fact, as soon as I tweaked something there I lost the picture on the TV (the options available are "Show desktop only on 1" (the laptop screen), "Show desktop only on 2" (the TV screen), and "Extend these screens", which annoyingly turns the TV blank yet allows the cursor to to enter the TV screen depending on the chosen layout and the cursor's approach direction to the TV).  So, from having a functional-if-slightly-oversized-and-lower-quality picture on the TV screen I went to nothing, at least for my desired use.  
    Further research led me to the Intel HD 4000 settings, but those didn't even show that multiple screens were in use when the TV is attached.  Finally, I tried using the NVIDEA Control Panel, but although multiple displays seem to be supported the best I can do when cloning is have the screens' resolutions meet in the middle at 1440x900, which makes them both look worse than the original plug-and-play result described above.  Heck, I went so far as to enter the BIOS and try every combination possible under "Graphics": no NVIDEA, Integrated, Discrete, each with and without "Auto Detect NVIDEA capability" enabled and disabled.  I even updated the NVIDEA driver to their newest, a version not available at the Lenovo Support site.  Nothing.  And worse, ever since my very first tweak under Windows display properties I wasn't able to return to the original  functional-if-slightly-oversized-and-lower-quality picture.
    At this point I used a very recent image to return my system to it's Pre Original Tweak state (allowing for the  functional-if-slightly-oversized-and-lower-quality picture originally obtained), which is better than nothing, I guess, but surely not what I'd expect from a higher end laptop.
    Please, does anyone know if there's a way to connect my T430, native resolution 1600x900, to an HD TV, native resolution 1920x1080, while actually maintaining each screens respective native resolution and not losing any of the image?  Thank you again for your time.
    Edit:  After more research I've fit the desktop image to the screen by adjusting the TV's "Picture/Advanced picture/HD size" setting from "Size 1" to "Size 2".  Now my only question is if it's possible to somehow play a 1080p movie at the TV's native resolution of 1920x1080 or if I'm stuck with the laptop's navtive resolution of 1600x900.

    Try grabbing the latest NVIDIA driver off of the NVIDIA website. It might help.
    Extending it should also allow you to run the 1600x900 T430 screen plus the 1920x1080 TV screen each at their native resolutions.
    W520: i7-2720QM, Q2000M at 1080/688/1376, 21GB RAM, 500GB + 750GB HDD, FHD screen
    X61T: L7500, 3GB RAM, 500GB HDD, XGA screen, Ultrabase
    Y3P: 5Y70, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, QHD+ screen

  • I need some help resizing my images on PS6. I am using a mac and have been trying to resize with same resolution and constaining proportions but for some reaseon the smaller resized image appears pizelated.

    I need some help resizing my images on PS6. I am using a mac and have been trying to resize with same resolution and constaining proportions but for some reaseon the smaller resized image appears pizelated. Heres an image of before and after. The first image I use is a JPG 72dpi 1500px x1500px and I want to downsize it to 600x600px same res, but it keeps pixelating, this has never happened before. Any suggestions, thoughts?
    thanks!

    I wouldn't say pixelated; more like blurry.
    Like ConnectedCreative said, what steps are you using? Are you using "bicubic sharper" when resizing down?

  • Hardware Requirements to get Satisfactory Resolution and Reconstruction from a Kinect V2 Scan

    I am new to the Kinect for Windows V,2 (KFW2) Sensor, and as a prospective hobbyist
     I am finding it difficult to determine the ”best for me” hardware requirements to acquire a satisfactory resolution and reconstruction from a scan to use in a 3D printer.
    Please excuse and correct any mistaken impressions I expose in the following overview of what I have learned so far.
    It seems that the measure of success to achieve my goal is to achieve 30 Frames per Second (fps) using applications such as Fusion Explorer and 3DBuilder while making a acan.
    After watching many video demos I have determined that the stated minimum system requirements published by Microsoft are focused on just getting the KFW2 sensor to actually “work” and have a mesh constructed regardless of quality. Beautiful models have been
    build using these applications, but in many of them I have heard both explicit and implicit comments that the computer used was much more capable than the stated minimum. In fact, in one such video the Microsoft presenter said words to the effect that “…we
    have some high-end computers here but you need more than that to get good results in real time...” In many cases a Surface Pro 3 was somewhere in the scene. Well I am using a Surface Pro 3 i7, and I do not get satisfactory results.
    So my question is, “Has anyone achieved a frame rate of 30 fps with Fusion Explorer and/or 3D builder? If so would you mind sharing the make and model of the computer you used, or the specs of the components you used (CPU, GPU, USB 3.0 controller, etc.)
    if you built your own custom computer.
    Thanks in advance         
    jperry

    Hi JPerry,
    I have a laptop with a 4GB 680m and a intel i7-3820qm (USB 3.0 eXtensible) and get a solid 30 fps fusion which takes around 60% GPU load with a 640 vox/m 256x256x512 grid. FPS drops to 17-20 when I increase the numbers to 768 vox/m, 512x512x768 grid.
    On my Surface Pro 3 256GB i5-4300U I can get a decent 20-25 fps with 384 vox/min 128x128x128. 
    Fusion is very memory intensive, hence the frame rate dependency on volume size. I think in the original Fusion paper they mention that each voxel element takes up 32bits of memory so for 512x512x512 it takes up 512MB of GPU memory. 
    I would say anything with 1.5GB of GPU memory, later than a (desktop) nvidia GTX 660 (or AMD equivalent) should get you a solid 30 fps unless you use huge volumes, then I would consider using some of the fusion alternatives such as Voxel Hashing or KinFu
    Large Scale. 
    http://www.graphics.stanford.edu/~niessner/niessner2013hashing.html
    http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/using_kinfu_large_scale.php
    Although you may have to do some work getting those working with the v2.

  • Reduced Jpg Version Export Quality

    Has anyone else experienced diminished sharpness in exported jpg versions from Aperture?
    I recently tried the automator script for exporting images directly to Keynote, what should have been a great facilitator for developing slideshows. I noticed softness in the keynote rendering, so I went back and exported master tifs from Aperture and then ran them through the image processor script in Photoshop CS2. Even when both programs have identical output parameters (jpg, fit to 1024x768, quality 12), the Photoshop image holds sharpness better through the process.
    While the difference is not staggering, it is there to the critical eye. I'd be happy to share an example image comparison, but I'd also like to hear if anyone else notices this difference when they reproduce the comparison. (make sure you go to Manage Presets in Aperture and set quality to 12 for the jpg output and use the same setting in image processor for consistency).
    Thanks,
    Mark

    I uploaded a side-by-side compare of Preview showing the exported image and what A2 shows with softproofing set to sRGB. The exported file was done with JPG, sRGB, original size, and max quality. There is clearly something wrong. I've tried export TIFF and other variations but can't get better results. If you click the below then select "All Sizes" at the top of the page the difference is totally obvious.

  • Best Quicktime resolution and codec for downloading a 1hr, 15 minute video

    Hello All;
    I have to create a video that can be downloaded and played via. the web. Looking at most downloadable content, I see Quicktime is used most often.
    My original fcp project is 1920 X 1080, 1 hr, and 15 minutes long.
    Would would you say is the best resolution and codec to use for the highest quality at the lowest total file size ? What do you use that offers you the results you like ?
    I've heard that MPEG 4 is used for web delivery and I've tried this at 720 X 480 but some of the images in the video like a american flag show a strange shimmering effect. I'm not sure what causes that as most of the video looks fine, only a few objects in the scene at various times.
    I have also heard H.264 is good for web delivery and am trying that now but it will take 15 more hours to finish the export. Not sure if I'll see the strange shimmering effect as I did with MPEG 4. Hope not but if I do, is there anything I can do to eliminate this ?
    Thank you very much.
    Tim

    An hour and 15 minute video is going to be huge. The smallest file size that's going to be adequate quality is probably in 800MB or better range. That's a big download for most punters.

  • Relation between image size, resolution and pixels

    I would like to increase the size of image by using PSE9.
    For sample existing image had: width (W) 6.073", height (H) 7.683", resolution 300, pixels W 1822, H 2305.
    A situation) when I changed the image to W 8, H10 and click on RESAMPLE the resolution on changed but number of pixels increase to W 2400  and
       H 3036
    B situation) Image size W 8, H 10 and NO ACTIVATED RESAMPLE. Now resolution reduced to 227 and number of pixel NO CHANGED from original
       W 1822, H 2305
    In my understanding if image blow up the number of pixels will be same as original and only the distance between pixels will be increase. So, resolution should
    be dropped.
    Now the question: How in sample A increase number of pixels? From where they come?
    More realistic looks sample B.
    Now other way: I used crop - make original image smaller. So, the number of pixels should degrees and resolution NO CHANGED. But PSE 9 shown number of pixels same and resolution increased.
    Is it right?
    What is wrong or right in above explanation?
    Can visible find the difference between samples A & B on computers monitor? I tried blow up sample B by 10 times and still no differences on screen,It is because resolution of monitor to low?

    A. Resample means elements adds pixels to the existng pixels to increase image size
        and\or resolution and subtracts pixels to downsize. Usually resampling to make an image
        smaller is okay, but resampling to make an image bigger can result in loss of quality.
        Of course that doesn't mean you shouldn't do it, just something to keep in mind.
    B. Leaving the resample box unchecked, elements only changes resolution (print size)
        and doesn't change the actual number of pixels (harm the image) so the image will
        be and look the same on your monitor.
    Usually a resampled image will be of lower quality than a non resampled image because
    elements has to make pixels to upsize and subtract pixels to downsize.
    Elements uses the resampling method choosen in the image size dialog to determine how,
    with one of the bicubic choices being the best for photos.
    Elements, as far as i know, uses the standard bicubic mehod for the resampling with the crop tool.
    A more detailed explanation:
    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/331/331327.html
    MTSTUNER

  • Image resolution and ipad3 retina

    I have just screenshot an ipad home screen from an ipad3 (with app buttons etc) and wish to place this into indesign as a mockup for a client.
    I have tried so many variations on resolution in Photoshop, making sure its placed in at 100% in indesign but it never looks crisp?
    Any suggestions on resolution and pixel size would be much appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Nick.

    Thanks for your reponse Bob,
    The image is fine in photoshop and a little worse in Indesign (display performance: High Quality), but when viewed on an ipad3 retina it isn't as hi-res?
    The image I screen shot is 2048x1536. Placed in an Indesign 1024x768 document at 50% with Actual 72ppi and Effective 144ppi.
    Is there something I'm missing?
    Thanks,
    Nick

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error -50 when trying to copy files to external hard drive.

    When trying to copy files (itunes music folder) to an external hard drive, I get the following message: Copying music failed. An unknown error occurred (-50). I have tried repairing disk permissions but still get the message. Any thoughts?

  • How to create Maintaince View and Help View

    Hi, Can u pls tell me the step by step procedure for how to create Maintaince View and Help View. And what's the use of these view's. Regards, Kumar

  • Business Content in BI7.0

    Hello BI Experts Could any one please tell me step by step on how to install Business Content BCS(Business Consolidation) cubes in BI 7.0. I m fairly new to BI 7.0 Any suggestions will be reciprocated with lots of points Thanks

  • How to Install printer in SAP

    Kindly give me the procedure for install the printers in SAP server and tell me the Documents were available in Websitea

  • Problems upgrading from 10.2.8 to 10.3 Please help

    Hi, first time here. I'm trying to upgrade from osx 10.2.8 to 3.0 Panther, but each time i try to upgrade or archive and install my mac freezes and the log says that newer versions of iMovie iCal iPhoto & isync packages are already installed as i dow