Image resolution and ipad3 retina

I have just screenshot an ipad home screen from an ipad3 (with app buttons etc) and wish to place this into indesign as a mockup for a client.
I have tried so many variations on resolution in Photoshop, making sure its placed in at 100% in indesign but it never looks crisp?
Any suggestions on resolution and pixel size would be much appreciated!
Thanks,
Nick.

Thanks for your reponse Bob,
The image is fine in photoshop and a little worse in Indesign (display performance: High Quality), but when viewed on an ipad3 retina it isn't as hi-res?
The image I screen shot is 2048x1536. Placed in an Indesign 1024x768 document at 50% with Actual 72ppi and Effective 144ppi.
Is there something I'm missing?
Thanks,
Nick

Similar Messages

Check image resolution and color

Please let me know whether it is possible to get the image resolution and color used in a eps file.
regards,
Sashi

You can specify the resolution for exporting, for document etc but resolution of the raster objects can not be retrieved.
Color space of the raster object can be retrieved using the rasterItems : colorants or imageColorSpace properties

Does anyone have a sticky iPhone since upgrading to ios8? Scrolling is rough in iTunes (horizontal album covers) and on the iPad it's much worse with photo and video albums! iPhone5s and iPad3 retina displays.

Does anyone have a sticky iPhone since upgrading to ios8? Scrolling is rough in iTunes (horizontal album covers) and on the iPad it's much worse with photo and video albums! iPhone5s and iPad3 retina displays.

Lots and lots of questions
The new Photos app in OS X should address much of this - it greatly simplifies syncing stuff across machines. Apple has details on it up here:
https://www.apple.com/osx/photos-preview/
It says "coming this spring" and a pre-release version has already been made available to developer testers.

Understanding image resolution and appearance across devices

I used CS6 standard.
Why have some images have soft edges under retina (iPad 3) but sharp on a screen (non-retina)?
Does this mean I will have to rework all my images to work with retina display? As most of my images are 72dpi, not sure if this relevant or not?
Can someone kindly advice me the best ideal way to overcome this problem.
Message title was edited by: Brett N

simonart wrote:
Paul, Yes, I can see where you are coming from. You have given me something to think about cropping.
Yeah, the proportions of the iPad3 are a bit off; I usually send out 600x400 pixel images - I find the proportions pleasing - for display on, mostly, social networking sites etc, and while most people up 'til now have considered 1080 vertical to be "HD" (LOL!!!) that's been good enough.
The Retina Display on both the iPad and MacBook Pro, is something of a game-changer image quality wise; we're now hearing rumors of an iMac with a Retinal Display! While that's still in fanboy nerdgasm territory - I've not seen any leaks out of the Apple supply chain about them having been sent sample displays - I think it really is just a matter of when, not if.
Mind you, I for one will be happy if these new HiDef displays dissuade people from posting their scuzzy fonecam pics all over the web (LOL!) as c.pfaffenbichler indicated above, pixels is pixels!!!

Exported Raw Conversion Image Resolution and Assigning a Color Profile, etc

In Aperture 1.1, although I set the exported Raw conversion image resolution to 300 dpi in the preferences, it continues to come out at 72 dpi which is something of an inconvenience. Also, is it possible to assign a color profile to the "exported version" so that it is congruent to my PS CS2 color workspace (if that is what its called). Is this program capable of carrying out a conversion as a background operation? Finally, can the layout windows be configured so that they remember how they have been used in the past? Thanks.

Iatrogenic huh! Cool!
Anyway, I'm not real clear on what it is you are trying to accomplish. Despite your obvious vocabulary skills, there seems to be some disconnect relative to what you are trying to accomplish. You are right that "exporting a version" in Aperture is roughly equivalent to what happens in ACR when you "Open" a RAW image into Photoshop. In both cases you have, hopefully, already done the adjusting of parameters you want prior to "exporting", or "opening". When you "open" or "export" you wind up with an "image" composed of pixels, whereas in the RAW adjustment phase you are just working with a temporary thumbnail and a set of mathematical instructions. Big difference, I suppose is that when you "open" and image from ACR into CS2, the resulting image is truly just pixels and has not had a "file type" applied to the file yet, until you "save" it, while in Aperture, if you "export" a file to CS2, or to the desktop, you end up with the file type already applied. Presuming you "export" a 16 bit TIFF or PSD, there is no operational difference.
I could be wrong, but with the new Bayer Demosaicing algorithms in Aperture 1.1, and the Camera RAW adjustments, you should be able to come up with an adjusted image that is VERY close if not identical to one done in ACR, with the possible exception of lens abberation adjustment. I was very critical of the RAW adjustments in 1.0.1, but I am very happy with the capabilites in 1.1. That said, I think there is still some room for improvement in user friendliness of some of the adjustments such as Levels.

Original Image Resolution and Color getting Distorted

Hi All,
I am using JAI for reading images from a source i have to read the images and than have to split the images
initially i was using ImageIO.read() method to read images but for some images it was throwing error as
javax.imageio.IIOException: Unsupported Image Type
     at com.sun.imageio.plugins.jpeg.JPEGImageReader.readInternal(Unknown Source)
     at com.sun.imageio.plugins.jpeg.JPEGImageReader.read(Unknown Source)
     at javax.imageio.ImageIO.read(Unknown Source)
     at javax.imageio.ImageIO.read(Unknown Source)
     at deepzoomconvertor.Main.loadImage(Main.java:370)
     at deepzoomconvertor.Main.processImageFile(Main.java:238)
     at deepzoomconvertor.Main.reteriveAllImages(Main.java:221)
     at deepzoomconvertor.Main.main(Main.java:86)so in such exception cases i am trying to read the images using JAI and i am successful in reading images
here is the piece of code i am using for this
BufferedImage result = null;
   SeekableStream ss=SeekableStream.wrapInputStream(new FileInputStream(file), false);
           ParameterBlock pb = new ParameterBlock();
           pb.add(ss);
           RenderedOp rm=JAI.create("JPEG", pb);
           result=rm.getAsBufferedImage();
             return result;it able to split images but the quality of images are poor it losts its original color format.
can any one have any idea how to do it while retaining the quality of image color and resolution
Thanks in advance
Umesh

The JPEG you are reading is a cmyk color space one. They're not common, but they do occasionally pop up in a collection of random jpeg images.
The default JPEGImageReader that comes with the jdk cannot read them. And it will throw an exception - the exact same one you got - stating it can't. JAI's behavior is a little worse. It will read the image without exception, when in fact it to can't read it. It doesn't handle the cmyk aspect right, so you get a messed up image.
The native JPEGImageReader that comes with installing [JAI-ImageIO|https://jai-imageio.dev.java.net/binary-builds.html] can read them. It appropriately decodes the ICC_Profile embedded within the JPEG and you get a cmyk BufferedImage. But if you wish to render this TYPE_CUSTOM BufferedImage, go grab a coffee while you wait for it to slooooowwwllly paint. You'll have to do a ColorConverOp to turn the cmyk BufferedImage into an rgb one (so Java2D can render it fast).
Having done all this you'll find that 1) ColorConvertOp makes the image too bright and 2) The native PNGImageReader that comes with installing JAI-ImageIO has an affinity for returning TYPE_CUSTOM BufferedImages (arggg!!!).
I'll help you fix points (1) and (2) if you get that far. Maybe the best choice is to simply give up on cmyk jpegs. They're only used in printing press environments, and people only use color space aware applications (like Photoshop) to manipulate them in any meaningful way.

Image resolution and zooming

I'm working with Photoshop CS4 and one feature that I really liked was the fact that no matter how much I zoomed in or out of an image, it never looked pixelated or distorted. Unfortunately, this has suddenly stopped working. Some zoom levels look fine, but every other one looks really bad.
I tried restarting the computer, looking through preferences, view, and image options, but was unable to find anything to fix it. Anyone have any suggestions?

Check the status of OpenGL drawing in preferences.

Scanning of Film Prints by Processing Labs - Image Resolution

I shoot a fair amount of film, in addition to digital, so I usually scan my own photos to be able to use the image editor. I've asked around to the run of the mill photo labs (wally world, costco, kmart, etc) about having my images output to picture CD and there appears to be quite a bit of difference in the image resolution and output format they offer. Many of them can't top my basic flatbed scanner.
anyone have any insight into this, or suggestions for where I might go to get a 5MP output image tif?
Most of the photo labs offer jpg at around 1600 x 1200
thanks!

Tyler/Chuck
My comment came about for 3 reasons:
1) I have come across quite a lot of people who either buy or save up for DSLRs who don't need them. They just think it's the only route to good pictures. The reality is that, in some cases, they never get a good pic because the cameras are too complex. The main thing is to be aware of the options.
2) For the last 15 years of film photography [I gave up film 3 years ago], I used SLRs. There really wasn't a choice. I started out with a bag full of lenses, which I lugged around. I missed loads of pictures because I hadn't lugged it. In the latter few years I started using "super-zoom" lenses - 28-200 and then 28-300. The effect was that I just didn't need any other optics. I was still carrying a camera weighing about 1Kg, but that was an improvement.
3) For me, photography is about taking pictures. Period. I come across so many people who are obsessed with all the equipment. They buy all the mags and are always hankering after something new. I sometimes wonder if they ever take any pictures [other than all those "test shots"]. I've had the same digicam for 3 years. I might upgrade it soon, but I'm not in a hurry.

How to change image resolution in oracle forms.

Hi Experts,
I am working on oracle forms 10g (Windows7 OS). Can we get the image resolution of an image item in oracle forms? Can we resize the image in terms of resolution?
I have a requirement where user can upload only 1280x720 size images. Either i have to validate the image resolution and give them a message saying 'Only 1280x720 size images are allowed' or simply i have to convert the image to be upload to 1280x720 size and save in the database. If someone could give the solution for the above problem that would be very much appreciated.
Thanks,
Pramod SR

1. You need to resample.
2. You can automate the process.
1.
Open one of the images.
Go to Image > Image Size
Set the units to Percent (100)
Change the resolution to 300 ppi (not cm!)
Make sure Resample is checked
2. automation
Test the above steps to make sure it works.
Record the steps as an action.
Make a droplet from the action.
Drag the folder with the images to the droplet.

Calibrating image resolution in CS5-CS6

I am teaching a class to create a courtroom display. I have a ppt from the FBI Lab that told me to take two fingerprints, calibrate the image resolution and find a common denominator before i can proceed. I am new to Photoshop and am not sure where i calibrate image resolution or how.

Thank you for responding. Someone from Foray contacted me and explained what to do. They want the image size of two photographs to be as close as possible to the same. If there is disparity, I am to find a number in pixels that is somewhere between the high and low of the two photos…a common denominator. When the photos are resized to that resolution they should fit on top of each other almost identically.
[contact information removed by moderator]

Find images resolution

Hi Forum,
I have tried to get alert for the links if it has 250 or 300 resolution. But if the pdf is placed, the script is replying error message.
"object does not support the property or method actualPPi"
How can i omit the check for PDF and continue to find other images resolution and alert.
var doc = app.activeDocument;
var graphics = doc.allGraphics;
var image, horRes, verRes;
for (var i = 0; i < graphics.length; i++) {
     image = graphics[i];
     if(image.actualPpi[0] ==300 ||
     image.actualPpi[0] ==250){
alert ("images are in 300 & 250 dpi");
thanks in advance forum...

hi -hans-
thanks for the quick reply,
on the flip side of it, it tried to check only for the "Grayscale" images. please see and if you can help on this...
var doc = app.activeDocument;
var graphics = doc.allGraphics;
var image, horRes, verRes;
for (var i = 0; i < graphics.length; i++) {
     image = graphics[i];
     if(image.imageTypeName == 'Grayscale' &&
     image.hasOwnProperty('actualPpi') != false &&
     image.actualPpi[0] ==250){
alert ("images are in 300 & 250 dpi");

What image resolution should use for the new iPad with Retina display?

What image resolution should use for the new iPad with Retina display?

http://www.ipadcasereview.com/ipad-3-cases-and-covers-top-of-page/#sthash.hZKnxH ku.dpbs
these are the best

Firefox mage quality and resolution was superb when I used XP and Vista. Now that I have Windows 7, however (with the Firefox 3.6.3 version), the image quality and resolution is poor. Please help me!

I am using the Firefox 3.6.3 version with my new Windows 7 operating system. When I used all the previous Firefox versions in my XP and Vista operating systems, image quality and resolution was excellent! However, now that I have upgraded to Windows 7 and Firefox 3.6.3, the image quality and resolution is poor (unacceptable for downloading purposes).
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== I first activated my new computer and installed the Firefox 3.6.3.

All my images are pixelated in firefox 3.6.3
http://www.dcgdcreative.com
Not only on my site but on most sites I view.
The issue is not solved by resetting the zoom text view (ctrl+0)
The issue is not resolved by starting in safemode with add-ons disabled
The problem seems to only affect .jpeg files and only on Windows 7 on my desktop; as I have viewed several sites using windows XP with my laptop, no issues.
I had the same issue with IE8 and was able to fix the problem with by setting up the compatibility view for all sites. Issue fixed no problems at all. But nothing similar for firefox?
Whats the deal?

I need some help resizing my images on PS6. I am using a mac and have been trying to resize with same resolution and constaining proportions but for some reaseon the smaller resized image appears pizelated.

I need some help resizing my images on PS6. I am using a mac and have been trying to resize with same resolution and constaining proportions but for some reaseon the smaller resized image appears pizelated. Heres an image of before and after. The first image I use is a JPG 72dpi 1500px x1500px and I want to downsize it to 600x600px same res, but it keeps pixelating, this has never happened before. Any suggestions, thoughts?
thanks!

I wouldn't say pixelated; more like blurry.
Like ConnectedCreative said, what steps are you using? Are you using "bicubic sharper" when resizing down?

Exporting photos for UHDTV or Native 4K TV, what are the best settings ? (File: Quality File: Color Space, Image Sizing and resolution) Or in other words; How can I get the smallest files but keep good quality for display on new UHDTV

Exporting photos for UHDTV or Native 4K TV, what are the best settings ? (File: Quality File: Color Space, Image Sizing and resolution) Or in other words; How can I get the smallest files but keep good quality for display on new UHDTV

You're welcome, and thank you for the reply.
2) Yesterday I made the subclips with the In-Out Points and Command-U, the benefit is that I've seen the clip before naming it. Now I'm using markers, it's benefit is that I can write comment and (the later) clip name at once, the drawback is that I have to view to the next shot's beginning before knowing what the shot contains.
But now I found out that I can reconnect my clips independently to the format I converted the master clip to. I reconnected the media to the original AVI file and it worked, too! The more I work with, the more I'm sold on it... - although it doesn't seem to be able to read and use the date information within the DV AVI.
1) Ok, I tried something similar within FCE. Just worked, but the file size still remains. Which codec settings should I use? Is the export to DV in MOV with a quality of 75% acceptable for both file size and quality? Or would be encoding as H.264 with best quality an option for archiving, knowing that I have to convert it back to DV if I (maybe) wan't to use it for editing later? Or anything else?
Thank's in advance again,
André

Image resolution and ipad3 retina

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for