JVM for the ARM Core

Can any body tell me about the JVM which supports the ARM core .
How do i get that ?
Is it free or i have to purchase license ? Please help me on this is it very urgent..

Jumping on the JVM bandwagon, I've posted a couple notes to the JES upgrade/install forum, but this is valid here..
Scenario #1
Installed Solaris 9 12/03 and JES Release 1
JVM version reports as 1.4.1_06
Scenario #1a
When i install Webserver 6.1 SP1, (after verifying that SUN supports this with JES) the JVM drops down Post SP1 application to JVM 1.4.1_03
Scenario #2
When I install Solaris 9 04/04 and JES Release 1
JVM version reports as 1.4.2_04-b05
Now Webserver 6.1 SP2 is out.. (notice the install docs say to install via JES not via SP2 installer.. but how do you do this??? I can't find further documentation, and the JES installer either uninstalls or installs the product that's part of JES??))
Anyhow, so.. It appears that the JVM is at the mercy of the Solaris version you install... What IS the optimum JES Release 1 JVM that I should be running..? Who's in command here, JES or Solaris..
For JES, I'm using portal, SRA, and ID svr, and Dir svr etc...
Things that make you go.. "Hmmmm"
Dave

Similar Messages

Not able to run the Java Program from jre for the ARM processor

Hi ,
I am try to run the jre1.4.2 for the arm core (linux 2.6kernel) which i downloaded from the sun site.
I am created the class file from the J2SE1.4 development kit. I created the simple HelloWorld Program and complied with J2Se then i copied that class file into my IMX board which has ARM core.
When i run the commnd java HelloWorld i am getting this error
dl failure on line 765Error: failed /dev/shm/jvm/j2re1.4.2/lib/arm/client/libjve
Please give me some suggestion to solve this porblem
Thanks in Advance
Narendra

I JRE i have download from the sun site . But when i am trying to run the simple helloWorld program in that it is giving the below error.
error:
dl failure on line 765Error: failed /dev/shm/jvm/j2re1.4.2/lib/arm/client/libjvm.so because /dev/shm/jvm/j2re1.4.2/lib/arm/client/libjvm.so: symbol __divdf3, version GCC_3.0 not defined in file libgcc_s.so.1 with link time reference.
Can anybody help me in this how to solve this problem . I also searched in the forum but did not get any answer on that problem
Thanks in advance.
Narendra

Need Help regarding the JVM for the ARM926EJS Processor

I Want to develop an application in java for the IMX.27 board which has ARM926EJS Procesor. This processor is jazelle enabled hardware.
My questiion is that how to get the JVM for this. So that i will use my Java appliaction. I am using linux OS.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Narendra,
Sun actually has a VM for the ARM ... well, actually 2 VMs for the ARM. Depending on your needs, there's a solution for JavaME CLDC, JavaME CDC, or JavaSE. There's also the open source implementations for CLDC and CDC. Here's how to get more info:
JavaME: http://java.sun.com/javame/index.jsp
CLDC open source project: phoneME Feature: https://phoneme.dev.java.net/content/phoneme_platforms.html#phonemefeature
CDC open source project: phoneME Advanced: https://phoneme.dev.java.net/content/phoneme_platforms.html#phonemeadvanced
Embedded SE: http://java.sun.com/j2se/embedded/offerings.html
email inquiry to: [email protected]
Regards,
Mark

Is the mac mini server the same hardware as the other mac minis (except for the quad core i7 and dual hard drives) with different software or is it configured differently?

I have a mac mini with an i7 dual core processor. It is perceptably slower than my macbook pro with a quad core i7. Does the mac mini server have the same hardware configuation as the regular mac mini with server software or is the hardware different (aside from the i7 quad core and dual hard drives)? I want a mini with a quad core i7...

Your assumption is correct. The server does however only
have the Intel HD3000 graphics like the base model with
no option, at this time, for the discrete graphics chip. So,
depending on what you are using it for, that could be a deal
breaker. Remember that your MBP does have a discrete
graphics chip.
I have a 2011 Mini Server connected to a Thunderbolt display
that gets used as an engineering workstation and general
personal use (some photo editing, LP restoraton, general
internet browsing). You simply just not enable any of the
server services. I find the combination to work quite well
for my purposes. I also have a 13" 2.7 GHz i7 Macbook Pro
which is pretty much strictly for work. As far as CPU
power it is pretty much equivelent to your Mini. For the most
part I find the Mini does outperfom my MBP. I heavily use
Parallels and Windows7 virtual machines, so the more cores
the better.
So, If you do a lot of CPU intensive stuff that is multithreaded,
the Server may help. If it is graphics intensive and your software
heavily leaverages the GPU, you may actually take a hit on
performance.

Windows 8.1 ADK Error with CopyPE for the ARM architecture

Hi folks,
I am following the command line page for COPYPE ( https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh825071.aspx )
If I read this correctly, I should use the following command :
copype arm C:\winpe_arm
The Copype.cmd file has nothing in it that accounts for ARM.
Furthermore, the Windows Preinstallation Environment Folder only has subfolders for amd64 and x86.
Where exactly is the ARM support ?
Thanks

Hi,
Based on my test, this phenomenon should be caused by lack of ARM directory in Windows Preinstallation Environment directory.
Roger Lu
TechNet Community Support

Vcd file generation for the T2 core

Hello everybody,
I want to generate a vcd file of a specific unit of the T2 using vcs (I haven't Debussy).
Which are the compile time flags and the runtime flags to be set using the sims script?
I tried the -enableEvcd and vcsd and cli at compile time and in the compile.log file I read
***** Warning: ACC/CLI capabilities have been enabled for the entire design.
For faster performance enable module specific capability in pli.tab file
But when I run the simulation with -dump_evcd instance_name in the sims.log I read
Error: $dumppports needs acc/cli capabilites specified at compile time. Please recompile with acc/cli capabilites enabled.
What am I doing wrong? I checked and I run the correct simv executable.
Thanks a lot in advance
Regards
pico

it is very simple, for example I wanted to generate the evcd file for the pick unit of the T2 core so I added
$dumpports( tb_top.cpu.spc0.pku, "pku.evcd");
in the file verif/env/common/verilog/misc/dump.v
after :
`ifndef VCD_OFF
// VCD Dumpfile
// sims does file naming and start/stop for us.
initial begin
$dumpports( tb_top.cpu.spc0.pku, "pku.evcd");
and I recompiled the T2.
Then as vcs_run_args I put +vcd
I recall you that this is not a clean solution, the evcd file will be created every time, maybe you can find something better!
HTH
pico

Don't wait for the Intel Core i7 CPU!!!

Anybody contemplating a new system with the Core i7 CPU better be warned! (Jim, are you listening?).
Due to the architecture of the X58 chipset, which does not allow for separate voltages for the CPU and memory, warnings about permanent damage to the core i7 are rampant.
The core i7 can NOT handle voltages over 1.65V. However, most DDR3 memory chips require MORE than 1.65V, sometimes up to 1.80V. In that case permanent damage to the core i7 is the result. It will be fried.

>"One of the biggest concerns about Bloomfield X58 motherboards were previous reports that X58 boards will have to use the same voltage for Vcore, CPU and Vmem, the memory on the board. In previous reports, we learned that first revision of the boards had these two things Vcore and Vmem synchronous.
>We learned that motherboard manufacturers will be able to separate the CPU and memory voltages, and yes, this means that you will be able to set the voltage on your CPU independently from the one on your memory.
>This will certainly make the overclocking much easier, as you wont burn your CPU with 1.8V voltages that you might need for some ultra faster DDR3 memories. You can expect that the next Asus, MSI, Gigabyte boards, among the others, comes with separate Vmem and Vcore settings."
Seems Asus chose not to separate them for their first gen P6T, but the option is there for future revisions and other mobos.
In any event, I had no trouble finding appropriate memory for this board. Shouldn't be an issue if one is careful about matching parts.
Still, this is a good warning, as I was not aware of the problem.

Anyone know a good place to get a 2GB chip for the new Core 2 duo MBP 2.16

I jst sold my MBP 17 ionch fro the core 2 duo so I can have three GBs Of ram for ma audio apps. I am trying to find a decent priced 2GB chip unless there is a typo crucial says 929.00 I almost passed out. I used to get all my ram there but that is just too high any other suggestions

I wouldn't expect a big drop too soon. That's a lot of RAM density on a small board. Unless there's a major increase in demand I wouldn't expect much of a drop in price.
No doubt there may be cheaper prices than Datamem's. Although their prices are usually competitive, they are not always the cheapest. But they do offer good service, fast delivery, have a good return policy, and experience with Macs. My recommendation is based on a 10 year history with them which has been 100 percent satisfactory.
But $500 for a marginal 1 GB of RAM is a lot. I'm not convinced it's enough to warrant going from 2 GBs to 3 GBs. I have 2 GBs in mine and it seems perfectly fine for my needs.

HT4848 what recovery assistant is recommended for the intel core 2 duo 2gb macbook?

After sending a flashdrives contents to the waste basket and emptying it, for some reason the file on the desktop containing identical files lost part of its content. Can I recover either the flash drive or the contents of the folder using some recovery app/software. I downloaded stellar phoenix but its behaviour is odd and unsuccessful , possibly due me. Is there a simple program you can recommend?
Thank You.

Go with the new model. You wouldn't notice much "real-world" difference between the two processors. With the new unit, you will get a much better screen, better trackpad and stronger graphics. It's a no brainer.
Dave M.
MacOSG Founder/Ambassador  An Apple User Group  iTunes: MacOSG Podcast
Creator of 'Mac611 - Mobile Mac Support' (designed exclusively for an iPhone/iPod touch)

Unable to presist the business indicator meta data for the Audit Core

The error above - caused by javax.ejb.EJBException is - I belive due to implementing too many business indicators? however I'm puzzled as to why this error occures and how to fix?
Thanks for any insights,
Ross

Hi Experts,
How to configure and launch the Siebel EAI?
I'm having problems with url: http://ws811/eai_enu/start.swe?SWECmd=Start&SWEHo=ws811
HTTP 500 - Internal server error
Internet Explorer
And the other url is OK:
http://ws811/sales_ENU/start.swe?SWECmd=Start&SWEHo=ws811
Please provide solution the asap.

How about Onyx and Macjanitor for the Intel Core Duo chip?

Do these programs apply?
SP

696/3142
Your first post is correct Will about MacJanitor.
I wouldn't trust it, although it should just refuse to work, why take a chance when other utilities exist and offer many more features...
Anyway the Terminal commands MacJanitor runs are still the same:
sudo periodic daily
sudo periodic weekly
and
sudo periodic monthly
or the three tasks together:
sudo periodic daily weekly monthly
as in Jaguar, Panther and "PPC Tiger".

Are there two different Core i7 2.0 Ghz CPU's for the 15" MBP?

I noticed on Geekbench that some people are getting Intel Core i7-2635QM @ 2.00 GHz CPU's and some are getting Intel Core i7-2620QM @ 2.00 GHz CPU's.
Same clock speed but different performance outcomes. The 2620 chip comes in around 6800-7000 in performance while 2635 gets 8800-9000 which is much closer to the i7-2720QM chip.
Intel does offer both 2620 and 2635 CPU's and I'm trying to figure out if different chips are being sent from Apple or if it is a case where some people chose the wrong CPU in Geekbench. However, wouldn't Geekbench automatically select the CPU that is is testing.
Please chime in and let me know. Below are the links to the tests.
2635QM chip, http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/search?q=2635&commit=Search
2620QM chip, http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/search?q=94245B3640C91C81+&commit=Search
I also noticed people with 64-bit software of Geekbench are getting higher scores, obviously.

You probably saw bench for the 13" Core i7 MacBook Pro that use an Intel® Core™ i7-2620M processor, which is a dual core (not quad core) core i7 @ 2.7GHz.

What to get: 3.7GHz quad-core or 3.5GHz 6-quad-core for the Mac Pro 6,1?

I'm thinking of getting the new Mac Pro 6,1. I want to keep the price down as much as I can. I work in, FCPX 10.1, Motion 5, Premiere Pro CC, After Effects CC, Speedgrade CC and DaVinci Resolve 11 lite? Sufficient to say I do a lot of rendering. I do not work with any 4K footage, just 1080P. So does anybody have any thoughts or experience with the MP 6,1 and do you think the 3.7GHz quad-core has enough power?
Thanks,
-Russ

There are two ways to get the 6-core:
One is to start with the entry for the 4-core (includes D300 graphics) and customize to 6-core processor only, adds US$500.
The other is to start with the 6-core (includes D500 graphics) and starts at US$1000 more.
If you buy the 4-core today, the processor can be third-party or do-it-yourself upgraded with an off-the-shelf processor later.
I expect others would advise you to buy as much graphics power as you can afford, but I think it has a smaller and diminishing return.

Linux: which toolkit is used in JVM for heavyweight components?

Hi,
which toolkit is used by the Linux-variant of the JVM for the heavyweight-components? GTK?
Oxy

java.awt.Toolkit is abstract. He means what implementation is used (motif-based, etc.). For example, sun.awt.motif.MToolkit.
It might vary from one Linux variant to another (and from one JVM version to another), I'm not sure. But for any particular Linux system, you can run this program to find out:
import java.awt.*;
public class test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getClass());
}Edited by: BoBear2681 on Apr 24, 2008 3:37 PM

JVM for Commodore 64

Help I need a JVM for the Commodore 64, I am trying to run my Traveling Salesman program on a Beowulf Cluster of C64's and can't find the JVM anywhere. If you can help I will give you Dukes!

Nice! (and thanks for the duke, btw, I'll cherish it always). I've been unable to find any 100 Mbps nics for you, but I think there's a box of old token ring cards around here somewhere, maybe we can figure something out there. I don't know if anyone's writing massively parallel Java out there - resources might be a little hard to come by. Maybe we could scale down the initial project to something more like that appointment tracking app that has been giving people around here such trouble?

JVM for the ARM Core

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for