Kaos weaver random image code does not validate with w3c

Hi
I have done a quick test validation on a site I am working
on, I have used Kaos Weaver's Advanced Random Image extension .
When Validating this comes up with about 60 errors, the ones I have
done I have corrected but not uploaded yet. Unfortunately I am not
skilled in java to go about correcting the kaos weaver errors.
Link to w3c:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.blanc-wall.co.uk%2FUp2Press%2520Website%2Findex.htm
Any help would me much appreciated guys
Andy

Mick White wrote:
> andy_forbes wrote:
>
>> Hi I have done a quick test validation on a site I
am working on, I
>> have used Kaos Weaver's Advanced Random Image
extension . When
>> Validating this comes up with about 60 errors, the
ones I have done I
>> have corrected but not uploaded yet. Unfortunately I
am not skilled in
>> java to go about correcting the kaos weaver errors.
>>
>> Link to w3c:
>>
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.blanc-wall.co.uk%2FUp2Press%2520Website%2F
>>
>> index.htm
>>
>> Any help would me much appreciated guys
>>
>> Andy
>>
> Bad link
> Mick
Oops, good link, errors are basic, Every image needs an "alt"
attribute,
and "&" needs to be encoded as "&".
Mick

Similar Messages

Digital signature does not validate with the given key

We are switching our single-signon provider from openssl to Weblogic's SAML. I am trying to create a test application that will send mock SAML assertions to our test Weblogic SAML server before we begin integration with the client that will send real SAML assertions.
I have configured a Weblogic 10.3.5 instance to be a SAML Service Provider as well as created an application that creates test SAML assertions to post to the SAML server. I'm currently using a self-signed certificate to sign the SAML assertion. I've imported the self-signed cert into both the DemoIdentiy.jks and cacerts on the Weblogic SAML server.
The Weblogic SAML server is giving the following error when trying to validate the signature of the assertion:
<SAML2Assert: Start verify assertion signature>
<SAML2Assert: The assertion is signed.>
<SAML2Assert: Digital signature does not validate with the given key
org.opensaml.xml.validation.ValidationException: Digital signature does not validate with the given key
at org.opensaml.xml.signature.SignatureValidator.validate(SignatureValidator.java:68)
at com.bea.security.saml2.util.SAML2Utils.verifySamlObjectSignature(SAML2Utils.java:229)
at com.bea.security.saml2.providers.SAML2Assert.verifySignature(SAML2Assert.java:285)
>
I get this error when the SAML assertion includes both the cert and the public key, just the cert, just the public key or neither.
I'm pretty sure I've configured the SAML instance correctly since I followed the steps provided by another group who got this working with a different client. The only difference is they are using a real signed certificate (Verisign i believe) instead of a self signed cert.
I'm looking for any help to track down which step in the process I've missed or implemented incorrectly.
Thanks!
Edited by: 911967 on Feb 6, 2012 12:26 PM

So I found my own answer to the issue. The error was being caused by an the following xml in the assertion:
<ds:Reference URI="">
The value of URI attribute must have a '#' followed by the same value of the ID attribute in the parent 'Assertion' element (in our case a random string):
<saml:Assertion xmlns:saml="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion" ID="a5k42vnhsywezqzyufq15c4bb9xuzeozrmbppj38xe" IssueInstant="2012-03-12T14:33:25.986Z" Version="2.0">
<saml:Issuer>ISSUER_NAME</saml:Issuer>
<ds:Signature xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
<ds:SignedInfo>
<ds:CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#"/>
<ds:SignatureMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1"/>
*<ds:Reference URI="#a5k42vnhsywezqzyufq15c4bb9xuzeozrmbppj38xe">*
How this is related to the digital signature is beyond me, though I admit I'm very new to saml and digital signing. However I spent a great deal of time investigating my certs and how I was creating the signature, which it seems is unrelated to the actual issue. I also wasn't able to find any docs specifying that this attribute was required, though I might have just missed it.

ITunes account does not validate with Click & Buy

I use the click & buy option with iTUnes. I entered my click & buy pinnumber and everything but iTunes keeps asking me to validate my click & buy account. Click & Buy however shows that my registration with iTUnes is fine.
iTUnes allways asks me to review my information when I login. What can i do here??

I am having the same problem and getting very irritated by it.
I buy something and then spend ten minutes going round in circles validating only for BTC&B to say that my account is already validated.

ERROR: "info.plist does not validate against DTD"

Hi! I got this error if anyone has it solved Please HELP.
I am trying to package a WRT widget using Nokia WRT extension for Adobe Dreamweaver. This is the place for info on the extension: http://www.forum.nokia.com/Tools_Docs_and_Code/Tools/Runtimes/Web_Runtime/
I figure developer from here who use DW to develop mobile content might know the error.
When come to the step of 'Package Nokia WRT Widget' I got this error: info.plist does not validate against DTD
and a page of error info shown like this:
DTD validated at: Wed Jun 17 2009 19:03:00 GMT+0800 (Malay Peninsula Standard Time)
DTD used for validation: http://www.nokia.com/DTDs/plist-1.0.dtd
Line
Column
Message
Explanation
Source
2
95
DTD did not contain element declaration for document type name
3
16
Attribute "version" exists, but can not be used for this element.
3
21
element "plist" undefined. Did you mean "applet" or "strike"?
4
7
element "dict" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "input"?
5
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
6
10
element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
7
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
8
10
element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
9
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
10
10
element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
11
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
12
10
element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
13
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
14
9
element "true" undefined. Did you mean "textarea" or "tr"?
Can anyone knows what this means and how i can solve it?
Please help. Thankyou.
note: I am new here and knows that keep asking quesion without giving back is not good but I have a deadline here and wanted to finish the job. I will read some other post and try to help in return when I am able to do so.

Hi pziecina,
Thanks for your reply,
I suspect my problem is the installation or setup of my system or software. as the result i tested is not by doing any scripting at all. All I did is following one of their example exactly (http://www.forum.nokia.com/Tools_Docs_and_Code/Tools/Runtimes/Web_Runtime/Dreamweaver_Exte nsion/QuickStart.xhtml) and package strightaway without modifying the code. because I want to make sure i got the extension install correctly. even so by packaging one of their ready make example already yield this error.

Task.toXML() creates xml that does not validate against WorklistTask.xsd

I am using the worklist API and I am using the toXML() function provided in the Task object to serialize my Task info to XML. It produces XML that looks alot like a "task" Element. But, it does not validate against the WorkflowTask.xsd schema. What is even more odd is that XML looks different than the xml I see when I look at the data in the BPEL Console.
For example, the first XML document below is from Task.toXML. notice that it's first child element is taskId. According to the xsd, that is not valid. The second xml document in this post is from the console. it appears to be valid.
Am I doing something wrong or should I just not expect the worklist api to produce valid xml? (correction: should I not expect the worklist api to xml that validates?)
<task xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/taskservice/task"><taskId>0D7B97F1B138EE21E04017AC2B194357</taskId><title>Payment not posted by payee</title><isGroup>true</isGroup><acquiredBy/><owner>bpeladmin</owner><conclusion/><state>ASSIGNED</state><subState>ASSIGNED</subState><processId>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processId><processName>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processName><versionNumber>1</versionNumber><notm>1</notm><taskGroupId/><taskType>http://blade-11.payveris.com:9700/orabpel/default/ResearchRequestWorkflow/1.0/taskConfigResearchRequest.xml</taskType><identificationKey>PAULA MERRILL, 2069</identificationKey><priority>3</priority><creator>bpeladmin</creator><creationDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.000-05:00</creationDate><updatedBy>bpeladmin</updatedBy><modifyDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.000-05:00</modifyDate><flexString1>1140724383057</flexString1><flexString2>PAULA MERRILL</flexString2><flexString3>PAULA MERRILL</flexString3><flexString4>PaymentId3489</flexString4><flexLong1>0</flexLong1><flexLong2>0</flexLong2><flexDouble1>0.0</flexDouble1><flexDouble2>0.0</flexDouble2><processVersion>1.0</processVersion><instanceId>2304</instanceId><domainId>default</domainId><approvers/><hasSubTasks>false</hasSubTasks><processOwner>bpeladmin</processOwner><pattern>SINGLE_APPROVAL</pattern><taskNumber>10240</taskNumber><systemString1/><systemString2/><systemString3/><versionReason>Task Created</versionReason><assigneeGroups>ResearchManager</assigneeGroups><payload confirmation_number="1140724383057" due_date="2006-02-22-05:00" reason="Payment not posted by payee"><requester xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema"><first>PAULA MERRILL</first><last>PAULA MERRILL</last><tax_id/></requester><payment_type xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema" number="">insuranceauto</payment_type><record_info xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema"><creation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00"/><updation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00"/></record_info><payment xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema" id="3489"><bank_info bank_id="2" funds_model="RISK"/><payment_info><confirmation_number>5428</confirmation_number><amount formattedValue="77.00" value="77"/><payment_date>2006-01-06-05:00</payment_date><check_number>5851</check_number><funded>false</funded><merged>false</merged><network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C">MOORE</network><alert_on_completion>false</alert_on_completion><alert_number_days_before>0</alert_number_days_before><scheduled_info id="2278"><scheduled_for_date formatted="01/06/2006">2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_for_date><scheduled_on_date formatted="01/06/2006">2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_on_date><created_user_id>282950</created_user_id><updated_user_id>0</updated_user_id></scheduled_info></payment_info><payee_info id="24958" relationship_id="6004"><payee_account_number>JUNIT123</payee_account_number><nick_name>blahblah</nick_name><name>complexpayeenameforatest</name><address1>123 main street</address1><address2>c/o anybody</address2><city>Dark Cityrandomizer</city><state>CT</state><zip>06512</zip><network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C">MOORE</network></payee_info><customer_info id="2069"><name>PAULA MERRILL</name><customer_account_id>8</customer_account_id><customer_account_number>213</customer_account_number><customer_routing_number>111111111</customer_routing_number><address1>Ernest Hemingway Drive</address1><city>Springfield</city><state>IL</state><zip>62703</zip></customer_info><state_info><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date><state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2">Cleared</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number></state_info><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>0</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="6">Created</state><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="6">Created</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:35-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="22">Waiting for Decision</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:36-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="12">Ready for Funding</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="9">Funded</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="12">Ready for Funding</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:03-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="9">Funded</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:56-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="Mailed" id="11">Payment Sent</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:59-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date><state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2">Cleared</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00"/><updation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00"/></record_info><research_request>false</research_request></payment></payload></task>
When Im look at the same task in the BPELConsole, the task looks like:
<task>
<title>Payment not posted by payee</title>
<assigneeUsers/>
<assigneeGroups>ResearchManager</assigneeGroups>
<acquiredBy/>
<owner>bpeladmin</owner>
<payload confirmation_number="1140724383057" due_date="2006-02-22-05:00" reason="Payment not posted by payee" >
<requester>
<first>PAULA MERRILL</first>
<last>PAULA MERRILL</last>
<tax_id/>
</requester>
<payment_type number="" >insuranceauto</payment_type>
<record_info>
<creation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00" />
<updation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00" />
</record_info>
<payment id="3489" >
<bank_info bank_id="2" funds_model="RISK" />
<payment_info>
<confirmation_number>5428</confirmation_number>
<amount formattedValue="77.00" value="77" />
<payment_date>2006-01-06-05:00</payment_date>
<check_number>5851</check_number>
<funded>false</funded>
<merged>false</merged>
<network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C" >MOORE</network>
<alert_on_completion>false</alert_on_completion>
<alert_number_days_before>0</alert_number_days_before>
<scheduled_info id="2278" >
<scheduled_for_date formatted="01/06/2006" >2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_for_date>
<scheduled_on_date formatted="01/06/2006" >2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_on_date>
<created_user_id>282950</created_user_id>
<updated_user_id>0</updated_user_id>
</scheduled_info>
</payment_info>
<payee_info id="24958" relationship_id="6004" >
<payee_account_number>JUNIT123</payee_account_number>
<nick_name>blahblah</nick_name>
<name>complexpayeenameforatest</name>
<address1>123 main street</address1>
<address2>c/o anybody</address2>
<city>Dark Cityrandomizer</city>
<state>CT</state>
<zip>06512</zip>
<network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C" >MOORE</network>
</payee_info>
<customer_info id="2069" >
<name>PAULA MERRILL</name>
<customer_account_id>8</customer_account_id>
<customer_account_number>213</customer_account_number>
<customer_routing_number>111111111</customer_routing_number>
<address1>Ernest Hemingway Drive</address1>
<city>Springfield</city>
<state>IL</state>
<zip>62703</zip>
</customer_info>
<state_info>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2" >Cleared</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
</state_info>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>0</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="6" >Created</state>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="6" >Created</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:35-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="22" >Waiting for Decision</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:36-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="12" >Ready for Funding</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="9" >Funded</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="12" >Ready for Funding</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:03-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="9" >Funded</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:56-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="Mailed" id="11" >Payment Sent</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:59-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2" >Cleared</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00" />
<updation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00" />
</record_info>
<research_request>false</research_request>
</payment>
</payload>
<conclusion/>
<state>ASSIGNED</state>
<subState>ASSIGNED</subState>
<processId>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processId>
<processName>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processName>
<processVersion>1.0</processVersion>
<instanceId>2304</instanceId>
<domainId>default</domainId>
<processOwner>bpeladmin</processOwner>
<taskId>0D7B97F1B138EE21E04017AC2B194357</taskId>
<versionReason>Task Created</versionReason>
<taskGroupId/>
<taskType>http://blade-11.payveris.com:9700/orabpel/default/ResearchRequestWorkflow/1.0/taskConfigResearchRequest.xml</taskType>
<identificationKey>PAULA MERRILL, 2069</identificationKey>
<comments/>
<priority>3</priority>
<creator>bpeladmin</creator>
<updatedBy>bpeladmin</updatedBy>
<hasSubTasks>false</hasSubTasks>
<approvers/>
<pattern>SINGLE_APPROVAL</pattern>
<flexString1>1140724383057</flexString1>
<flexString2>PAULA MERRILL</flexString2>
<flexString3>PAULA MERRILL</flexString3>
<flexString4>PaymentId3489</flexString4>
<flexDouble1/>
<flexDouble2/>
<flexLong1/>
<flexLong2/>
<flexDate1/>
<flexDate2/>
<flexDate3/>
<attachment/>
<taskNumber>10240</taskNumber>
<creationDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.955-05:00</creationDate>
<modifyDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.955-05:00</modifyDate>
<isGroup>true</isGroup>
<versionNumber>1</versionNumber>
<notm>1</notm>
<expirationDate/>
<expirationDuration/>
</task>
Message was edited by:
gjacobi

I am using oracle.tip.pc.services.hw.task.impl.Task
that object has a toXML method.
To get that object, I am using the RemoteWorklistServiceClient.getWorlistTaskById method.
A word of caution. Not only am I still having the issue above (I had to hack my own WorkflowTask.xsd to make it validate) but I have noticed that the toXML() method actually returns different results when you think it would not. For example, I have something similar to the following code:
task.toXML()
task.toElement()
task.getPayload()
task.toXML()
The first and last toXML methods produce strings that do not match (it adds some empty elements to the end of the document). Weird. Very Weird.
Greg

Help! Toning in bridge and once we make corrections to images it does not stay

Good afternoon everyone -
We are currently processing a wedding in CS5 and Bridge. Once my assistant tones the images it does not retain the information and reverts to a random horrid color setting.
We have never seen this before - in 100 of weddings we have done.
Any suggestions? Some sort of random setting we hit by accident?
Thanks in advance -
Stacey Ambrosio
Ambrosio Photography

the_wine_snob wrote:
Stacy,
I was unaware that the Adobe RAW Converter would even launch from within Bridge, as I have never even tried that workflow. Most users launch it from within either PS, or Lightroom.
Just my guess is that like image Rotation, whch first writes instructions to the metadata, but that will only affect how the image is displayed in Bridge, until the file is Saved, and then the metadata instructions are actually applied to the pixels, something is just not transferring in your case.
Maybe another user, who does employ Bridge in this fashion can help, but I only use it as a file manager.
Good luck,
Hunt
Yes you can do that. I do it every now and then. But what does happen when opening ACR from Bridge is Bridge is not accessible until you close the ACR window.
I do this mainly to convert RAW files to DNG's so I don't have to deal with the XMP sidecar files. All edits made to DNG files are stored in the DNG.
As to Stacy's problem I have never experienced this. Always any edits made in ACR, whether opened by Bridge or calling up PS, have always bee retained.
I suspect it is a corrupted ACR 8bi file.

My html table code does not seem to be recognized in Safari

The following code does not produce a table (blank page) in Apple's Safari browser. Any help/explanation would be appreciated.
<div style="text-align: center;"> </div>
<table style="margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; height: 455px; width: 455px;" border="0" cellspacing="15">
    <tbody style="text-align: left;">
        <tr style="text-align: left;">
            <td style="text-align: left; background-image: url(images/stories/ist2_2993276-compass.jpg);"></td>
            <td style="text-align: left; background-image: url(images/stories/1040_and_us_treas_ck.jpg);"></td>
            <td style="text-align: left; background-image: url(images/stories/pastarchives.jpg);"></td>
        </tr>
        <tr style="text-align: left;">
            <td style="text-align: left;"></td>
            <td style="text-align: left;"></td>
            <td style="text-align: left;"></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>
<div style="text-align: center;">
    <table style="width: 300px; height: 300px; text-align: left; margin-left: 50%; margin-right: 50%;">
        <tbody>
            <tr>
                <td style="background-image: url(images/stories/ist2_2993276-compass.jpg);"></td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
            </tr>
        </tbody>
    </table>
</div>

Hey DYurko,
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
If you purchased items from the iTunes Store and the only place you have them stored is on your iOS device or iPod, you can transfer them to any computer that is authorized for your iTunes Store account.
iTunes Store: Transferring purchases from your iOS device or iPod to a computer
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1848
Have a nice day,
Mario

Tax code does not appear in any G/L account item Message FF753

Dear all,
During creating billing document, the system cannot post account document and display the follow error message:
FF753 Tax code does not appear in any G/L account item.
I tried to trace the program and found internal table t_bseg containing 3 entries:
1: Customer a/c: without tax code
2: GR clearing a/c: without tax code
3: Output tax a/c: contain tax code
Customer a/c and GR clearing a/c without tax code causes this error.
Anyone know how to solve it?
Thanks & B.Regards

Hi,
In FS00 for GR/IR A/c in Control data, in Tax Category choose all tax types allowed (*) and also tick posting without tax allowed and try again.
Regards,
Sadashivan

After upgrading to Lion Image Capture does not work, even though it is intel software. Gives error 9931. What gives?

After upgrading to Lion, Image Capture does not work, even though it is intel software. Gives error 9931. What gives?

Ouch, if it is indeed damaged, then sadly you need to restore the whole danged huge OS!
Didn't used to be this way before Lion/10.7.
Bootup holding CMD+r, or the Option/alt key to boot from the Restore partition & use Disk Utility from there to Repair the Disk, then Repair Permissions.
If that doesn't help Reinstall the OS.

Image Processor does not start through Bridge CS5

Image Processor does not start through Bridge CS5, it starts only PS and nothing happen. I do not know, how to repair it.

Most likely you do not have the startup files checked.
In Bridge go to edit/preferences/startup scripts. Make sure you have a check mark for Bridge and Photoshop. Without that they can't talk to each other.

Import images grid does not show file extension

I use Aperture in a "referenced" mode. At times, I have jpeg files in the same folder as my nef files (which had already been imported into Aperture). The import images list does not have (or I cannot find out how to display) the file name that shows the file extension too. Of the data available, i can scroll to the right and see a lot of different metadata in the list, but not the file extension.
Does anyone know how to have the file extension displayed in the list that is shown when trying to import?
thanks

Aperture can display just about anything you would like to display. The key is putting the correct field into the metadata set for that is being used for the browser or viewer that is active (you can have two ready to go and switch between them or none with a shortcut key)
This should tell you everything you ever didn't want to know
[Aperture Metadata Display|http://photo.rwboyer.com/2008/08/aperture-and-metadata-display>
RB

Condition type & tax code & does not exist

Hi,
I have a problem to find out the reason why i can not process documents which came via IDocs from Sales SAP system. The error is "Condition type & tax code & does not exist". Following places i have already checked :
1. FTXP - tax code for which error exists the same in both systems
2. Table A053 - Condition types for specific tax codes and country are created in both systems.
The tax determination is under billing and in Sales system it is ok, document is posted and when comes to our FInance system via Idoc it is in error even we have the same entries in the table A053.
Maybe someone knows what can be also checked ?
Thanks
Tomek

Hi Tomasz,
Please go to T.code WE02 and check the reason for the error.
The failed IDocs will be in status "51" and will also give you the reason for errors.
Regards,
Shiv

The material code does not exist or is not activated

Dear All,
I am using SAP ECC6. When I go through MM03 for certain material code, it gives the error: The material code does not exist or is not activated.
But this code exists in MARA. There seems to be no problem in the fields of MARA.
Where the problem can be?
Regds
Amit

do you know when and how the material was created?
Maybe the material is stored with a key that does not anymore fit to the customizing.
In SE16 in menu Settings > user parameter check if you have a flag in field conversion exit., if yes, then remove it and display this material along with other materials that you can access with MM03 in one list.
Check if the material number is different from the others (e.g. with or without leading zeros)

Tax Code does not exist in the system (T007A)

Hi All
When we try to create a receipt for a particular expense type in ESS Travel & Expenses, we get the follwing error "Tax code Z0 does not exist in the system (T007A)". Upon creating a tax code Z0 it gives the following error "Tax code does not exist in the system (T007A)". When we change the Receipt currency to USD instead of Bristish Pound it gets accepted without the error. It works perfectly fine when expense report created using GUI. The error occurs only when we create the expense report using Portal ESS T&E. I was not able to find anything related to this in the SDN. If any of you could help me out, that would be great.
Thanks, Raj

Hello Mr. Raj!
I checked the related issues that other customers reported.
I came up with a list of things you can try that may help you solve your issue.
a) Check if the field V_706D_B-LAND1 is filled with the home country in the IMG step 'Define Global Settings'. So may I ask you to check. Moreover, if this is not the reason, may I also ask you, if you get the same error when using our backend test transaction PR_WEB_1200? Thank you,
b) Could you please check that you don't have any expense type with value " "(blank) in the tax code field in V_T706B1?
c) Apply Note 1129853 - Web: Input tax code for credit card receipts
d) Please follow in IMG:
Financial Accounting
Travel Management
Travel Expenses
   Master Data
    Control Parameters for Travel Expenses
     Define Global Settings
Input Tax
Country                                       { Your country here }
Enter an input tax code for 0% input tax [    ] <<<
If here it's blank, this must be filled with a tax code. I found this out when I set the field "Input Tax per Travel Expense" then I get a warning "Enter an input tax code for 0% input tax".
The reason for this is that in your system, you don't have a "blank" tax code and it looks for this entry. Please kindly define a tax code in this setting.
I hope I was able to help you with this information.
Wilian Segatto
SAP Support - HCM/XSS

IDoc error - Condition type & tax code & does not exist

Hi,
I have the problem with CANADA tax codes. I have a few documents sent from external SAP to different SAP. In the source system documents were posted. In the target system i have error "Condition type & tax code & does not exist". I have compared the tables A003 and A053 in both systems and the settings are the same for specific Condition type and tax code... So where to find the reason Idocs are in error ? The only thing which is different is validity from (in the source system is earlier than in the target but the docs are created after both validation start)...
I would appreciate advice.
Tomek

Hi Tomasz,
Please go to T.code WE02 and check the reason for the error.
The failed IDocs will be in status "51" and will also give you the reason for errors.
Regards,
Shiv

Kaos weaver random image code does not validate with w3c

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for