KE27 Trasfer to COPA

Hi Gurus,
After closing Material ledger closing, once revaluation done through KE27 to COPA, the value is not matching with Material ledger.
One FG with reference to the sales order i am getting variance value in material ledger which is not matching while doing KE27 to COPA.
Kindly advise the settings or the flow.
Thanks.
S.Siva.

Hi,
Thanks for your input, i did the same settings. After completion of CKMLCP, then i am looking CKME for the FG Item with referece to the Sales order. It has revalaution of consumption i.e variance from the prodcution order. The same value is not updating after running in KE27.
Is there anytihing need to do.
Immediate response is highly appriciated.
Thanks.
S.Siva.

Similar Messages

KE27 Revaluation of COPA in case of 2 sales orders

Hi,
in our brazilian company, we have several processes that include 2 or 3
sales orders; according to the recommandation in help.sap.com library
Brazil:
SD u2013 Nota Fiscal Integration in SD u2013 Nota Fiscal Customizing in SD u2013
Future Delivery
=> e.g. Recommendation for Future Delivery Process: Create 2 sales
orders (VEF and VEFR)
If we try to run KE27 for an invoice, the actual revaluation is 0.
The reason is that the actual valuation of material ledger (for example
in transaction CKM3N) is connected to the first sales order, but the invoice is triggered by the second sales order.
It looks like KE27 is not able to read the valuation of the second
sales order.
How can the COPA document of this invoice be revaluated to actual costs
using KE27? Or is there another way to revaluate this?
thanks for your help - br,
Wolfgang Steinhart

Solved myself

Revaluating COPA COGS with Material Ledger values (KE27-B0 curr type)

While attempting to use transaction KE27 to revaluate COPA with material ledger's cost component structure, we are getting an error for the B0 (Operating Concern Currency) records. The error (KE 435) states that "Costing Key ML1 does not exist". I have defined this costing key and it appears to be working for the Company Code (curr type 10) currency records. Does anyone have any idea why I am unable to restate the Operating Concern Currency records?

Hi Thomas,
The system posts the difference between the original values of the line
item and the new values in a new, separate line item, but in the same
value fields. To avoid the error message KE435 you have to define for
the costing key a value field for actual costs for your operating
concern in customizing :
Profitability Analysis -> Master Data -> Valuation ->
Set Up Valuation Using Material Cost Estimate ->
Define Access to Actual Costing/Material Ledger ->
Costing Key for actual Cost Estimate ->
Val.Fld Allocatn for Periodic Moving Average Price (total cost)
That is necessary even though you defined already value fields in
Cost component structure (cost component split) in customizing :
Profitability Analysis -> Master Data -> Valuation ->
Assign Value Fields (transaction KE4R)
The program expects both entries, one for cost component total cost
and several for cost component split. If there is a cost component
split defined for material the valuation will distribute the share of
costs to the value fields according the definition.
Only for material without a cost component split the program will
assign the costs to the value field for total costs.
Regards,
Abhisek

Actual COGS and Production Variances to COPA (KE27)

Dear all,
if the COGS is revaluated with the ML (revaluation of consumption)
if the COGS is mapped as a dedicated value field in COPA
if the COGS @ actual is passed to the COPA (KE27)
Hence is no longer needed to settle the production order variances to COPA!???
Thanks

Hello Francesco,
Yes. Very True.
Actual Costing will roll up the Cost for every next level. Without ML, the entry normally posted to FI when we run settlement.
Dr/Cr. Production Variance
Cr/Dr. COGM
This is where it remains for information, since Both GL accounts belongs to P & L.
When ML is activated, the variance is added to the next level of the product. Here , if we observe, settlement of variance neither impacted FI, When there is no ML Activation, nor impacted FI when ML is activated.

Error in KE27 - run for trading goods

Dear gurus!
i have a error when i run KE27.
Current, my customer don't have production activity. In SAP system, we activated Material Ledger. in period, i wanna run Periodic valuation (KE27) for all trading goods. (Note that we don't have finished good because not have production, customer just sell trading goods)
I configured some steps follow:
1. Define and Assign Valuation Strategy (in this step, i wonder that which valuation strategy is user for valuation for trading goods)
- valuation trategy : 001
- sequence     material costing       quantity field
       10                        x                            VV099
- assignment of valuation strategy
point of valuation                   record type              valuation strategy
    02                                              F                               001
2. Define Access to Actual Costing/Material Ledger
   Costing key - 01
0 legal valuation
1. only trasfer total cost
   periodic a/c line item
3. Assign Costing Keys to Material Types
point of valuation           record type    Material type        Valid to         costing key 1
        02                                   F                 HAWA              31.12.9999       01
Then, after run period closing in Material ledger, i run KE27 to periodic valuation , but system get error:
" Message no. KE435 - Costing key 01 does not exist
In Profitability Analysis, the system tried to valuate by reading a product cost estimate. The Customizing settings in CO-PA call for valuation using costing key 01.
This costing key is not defined "
explicitly, i maintained costing key and assigned this to trading goods - material type.
Please, help to fix it!
any idea is appreciated.

Activating ML is necessary because in my customer's company sell goods at planed price then revaluate value of inventories and COGS at actual price in the end of each of period. So we decide to use standard price control for trading goods and active Material ledger.
end of period, we run period procedure of ML for trading goods, we expect allocation different amount, revaluate inventories and consumption. Run revaluation step of costing run in ML, we revaluate all   ending inventories and consumption transaction except billing transaction. So, we think that we need to run Ke27 to revaluate all line item document in COPA from billing.
so anybody to help me revaluate consumption amount from billing at actual price in end of period?
thanks in advance!

Non SD invoice in COPA reporting and other expenses

Hi Guys,
With reference to my previous thread, is it the right way to assign non SD invoice to value fields thru PA transfer structure. What would be the business impact of this. and do we need to do assessment to this PA trasfer structure.
And how this characteristics are attached to value fields ?
Thanks and Regards,
Ram

Hi ,
COPA gets values from Billing documents thru Condition Type/Value fields mapping ( KE4I).
Condition Types are to be mapped with Value fields in KE4I to have the value populated in COPA .
Values from FI to COPA flow thru PA Transfer Structure .
Regards
Sarada

Actual cost of product in COPA

Dear all,
I am relatively new to COPA functionality.
The requirement is that actual cost of product should be reflected in COPA and not the planned.
Kindly give me the background also, as in the integration of COPC and COPA.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Sudhakar is completely right in his comments. But, I would not just accept that actual costing is not active, so you have to find a solution without it. Your requirement is a good reason to activate actal costing, and calls for it.
The way SAP foresees to bring actual costs into CO-PA would be:
Activate material ledger / actual costing
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/a5/320e28d56c11d295c200a0c930328a/frameset.htm]
Calculate periodical actual prodcut costs at period end
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/ec/f835d7f08311d185810000e8a4bacc/frameset.htm]
Revalue CO-PA at actual costs with KE27
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/f5/0f0739edfcb03ae10000000a11402f/frameset.htm]
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/7a/4c39be4a0111d1894c0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
That brings you a completely integrated and accurate solution for actual product costs in CO-PA
best regards,
Udo

Cost component split transfer for Profit center valuation in ke27

Dear All,
We have activated multiple valuation/transfer prices. Material ledger is also activated.
We want to transfer cost component split to CO-PA by ke27.
We have defined separate costing keys for access to actual cost estimate for legal and profit center valuations.
But cost component split transfer to COPA works only for legal valution. Even we have defined type of valution for profit center costing key -transfer cost component split and total costs.
What should be else customized to transfer cost components splitting in profit center valuation to CO-PA from actual cost estimates?
With best regards,
Kamila.

Hi,
I have assigned the same value fields used for legal valuation to column 2, which was pointed in message.
But now I got following message in ke27:
For actual data, value fields that were already populated before CO-PA valuation cannot be changed in valuation.
1. As a rule, value fields that were filled before CO-PA valuation - be it from SD or by a manual entry of a line item - can only be changed by means of user exits.
(Note that for plan data, CO-PA valuation always has priority over the values planned manually.)
2. The valuation steps in a CO-PA valuation strategy are numbered sequentially. These numbers determine the order in which the steps are carried out within that strategy. As a rule, value fields populated in one step can be used as a basis for calculating values for other value fields in a subsequent step.
Value fields that were populated in a previous step are generally not overwritten by subsequent steps.
The exception to this are steps that use a CO-PA user exit. User exits let you change individual value fields.
3. If you valuate using multiple material cost estimates simultaneously, this means that the values of different cost components within the same cost estimate are aggregated and then entered in one CO-PA value field. However, value fields that already contain data from a previous cost estimate are not overwritten by a later cost estimate. Consequently, you should assign value fields in Customizing so that the values of different cost estimates are entered in different sets of value fields.
4. When condition values are transferred to CO-PA value fields, note that condition types that are assigned to the same value field are added together. This is also the case when the condition types come from different costing sheets within the valuation strategy.
So does it mean we should define separate value fields for PC valuation?
With best regards,
Kamila.

Help- COPA Report KE30 Unusual value problem

Hi,
My COPA report from ke30 showing the bellow value which is unusal to my real value. though we are now entering backlog data but the COGS value which is showing is more less than the actual value. please suggest what to do to correct the report.
Sales quantity            1,958,412.000
Gross Revenue             653593,271.00
VAT                            86,064,276.00
Net Revenue(aftr VAT      567528,995.00
Sales Excess              19,721,488.00
Freight Revenue            5,491,314.00
Total Revenues            592741,797.00
% Based discount              0.00
Quantity based disco       0.00
Material Rebate               0.00
Customer Rebate            9,556,570.00
Free of charge                 3,499.97
Net Revenue(Aft dis) 583188,726.97
Raw Material                       0.00
Packing Material              0.00
Labour Var                         0.00
Raw Material                       0.00
Packing Material              0.00
Labour Var                         0.00
Labour Fix                         0.00
Power Var                          0.00
Power Fixed                        0.00
Mfg OH Var                         0.00
Mfg OH Fixed                  0.00
Packing OH Variable      0.00
COGS                           495040,646.82
COGS Internal price      24,647,600.96
Mfg Cost(Standard)            0.00
Production Variance      28,883,245.46-
Purchase variance          5,002,496.04-
Revaluation of Inven         275,261.45-
Actual Cost               34,161,002.95-
Gross Profit              617349,729.92
Admn Exp                           0.00
Depreciation                       0.00
Finance Exp                        0.00
Selling and Dist Exp          0.00
Thanks
Rajib

Hi rajibimran
There is a transaction (KE27) that reavaluates standard price for actual price.
I dont know how your system is set, but during months all cost elements are set using standard price.
During period end closing, after you run actual costs (CKMLCP) you have to revaluate CO-PA with actual price.
Regards
Fred

Credit Memos and KE27 periodic valuation

Hi
We created a credit memo without reference to a billing document with actual goods return in period 03 2012 (June 2012). Then we ran ML settlement.
We when we ran KE27 we got the error message MLCCS030 no valuation exists for material #
We did not know why this was a problem. When we received the credit memo for goods return copa was created with
COGS value field was filled with say 100$.
Also qty field was filled with say 10 numbers.
Any thought proces. We are in midst of closing and we need response very soon.
Thanks
Raj

Hi,
Hi,
The T-code-KE27-Run Periodic Valuation of Actual data is actually meant for actual data related postings for CO-PA. Periodic valuation makes it possible for you to select and valuate actual data which has already been posted to Profitability Analysis (CO-PA). It uses a valuation strategy defined especially for the point of valuation 02 (Periodic actual valuation). This function is available for the record types A (incoming sales orders) and F (billing data) as well as user-defined record types.
Periodic valuation is useful, for example, if you posted line items to CO-PA at the beginning of the period using the standard cost of goods manufactured, and want to evaluate them again later using the most up-to-date costs or using the actual costs of goods manufactured determined in Material Ledger.
The system posts the difference between the original values of the line item and the new values in a new, separate line item. If you perform periodic valuation more than once for a single line item, the system posts a new "difference" line item each time the values change.
Once you have performed periodic valuation, you can display the new values in the information system.
For valuation using material cost estimates, you can choose the alternative option of displaying the periodically calculated values separately from the original values. To do this, you need to define special value fields into which to store the values from periodic valuation.
Only values that are calculated in CO-PA during valuation can be recalculated in periodic valuation. However, those quantities and values that are stored according to the same value field assignment found in SD pricing when transferred from sales orders and billing documents remain unchanged
CKMLCP is not must for KE27.
Revert for clarification.
S.Subbiah.

COPA user exits

Hi,
I am working an issue and was hoping to get confirmation I'm on the right track or some advise otherwise.
We are executing KE27 at month end. In certain cases the COPA doc created holds the revaluation only in value field vvcml. There is no cost component split because the material is purposely assigned a price determination of 2. Is there an exit that is called during KE27 that I can use to copy the amount in vvcml to a cost component value field so the PA doc created by KE27 holds a revaluation amount in multiple value fields? Can I use enhancement COPA0002 / function module EXIT_SAPLKEAB_001 to accomplish this? Would it also be necessary to add a step in my valuation strategy to assign the user exit via KE4U? I tried enhancement COPA0005 but seems code added to include ZXKKEU08 was not called during execution of KE27. Thanks.

Hi
Go to KE4R and see if you have assigned one single Val Field against Record Type 02??
Ideally, you can assign a different VF per cost component at this place.. Does this help you?
br, Ajay M

Copa-doubts

Dear SAP Experts,
I have few doubts in copa and would appreciate your response in regards of that.
1. Actually i have configured costing based copa at client side with standard costing i.e actual costing / material ledger is not activated. Now the question is whether copa value fields will be updated with actual value or only standard value with price diffrence be updated in value fields.
2. All the expenditure which posted to cost centers and further assessed thru ksu5 in month end. How these expenditure will flow to copa value fields.
Helpful answer will be deleted
Regards / Ashok verma
Moderator: Please, search SDN and Wiki

Hi,
1. Actually i have configured costing based copa at client side with standard costing i.e actual costing / material ledger is not activated. Now the question is whether copa value fields will be updated with actual value or only standard value with price diffrence be updated in value fields.
COPA value fields will be updated with standard value only.
To update price difference in value fields ML should be active. Then at period end you can run revaluation KE27 to update the price differences
2. All the expenditure which posted to cost centers and further assessed thru ksu5 in month end. How these expenditure will flow to copa value fields.
It should be KEU5 (not KSU5). Here in KEU1 you define the cycle i.e. the receivers (characteristics) and senders (cost centers).
Using the other configuration parameters you can decide how the value fields will be populated.
It is difficult to explain the entire logic in a short message. You should try this in test system .create a cycle using KEU1 and then run it using KEU5. This will create record type D in COPA.
regards
Waman

Consumption of FG to Cost Center flow to COPA

Hi,
We have ML in system.
Users are consuming some FG to Cost Center through MB11 and lets say 711 movement type. So this generates ML documents.
Now question is how can I can see this data in COPA?
When we do Periodic Revaluation in COPA through KE27, only those values that has been sold are only revaluated with PUP price. So that we can see that in Actual COGS value field.
But what about those consumption that occurred in cost center?? How will I reconcile those figure in COPA?
To give more information:
We are running CKMLCP. We do Revaluation of Consumption step.
But in post closing step we are not selecting Revaluation of Consumption check box.
I am finding it very hard to reconcile COPA value and FI doc.
Kindly help.
regards
Kami

Hi Ajay,
Thanks for valuable input.
I also thought in the same line , but user has the following concern on this:
Assessment Cycle: As per Users, it cannot be used because this will allocate based on allocation basis. But they need, the values that was posted at the time of transaction and as per materials. So it wont be accurate through Assessment cycle,
OKB9: They have different Cost center for different valuation area for the same GL Account.
Hence through OKB9 also, we cannot post directly to COPA.
That's the reason the above option were not adopted.
My other concern to this is:
In CKM3, we have two lines under consumption, one for Normal sales PGI and other is Cost Center.
After doing revaluation of consumption in CKMLCP, we see one line under Cost Center :Revaluation of Consumption Figure"
My question, where can I see that figure whether in any table or in Cost Center report??
If that is also available we can try to match those values and post to COPA.
Let me know your thought on this.
Thanks and regards
Kami

Non Stock relevant variance in COPA

Hello Gurus,
In the std. Cost estimation we have both STOCK RELEVANT and NON STOCK RELEVANT cost components. The STOCK RELEVANT are connected to VPRS condition type and NON STOCK RELEVANT are having some custom defined condition types.
We linked the STOCK RELEVANT cost components to Value fields and NON STOCK RELEVANT SD condition types to VF. Is this correct?
At the time of billing, we get the values to both stock and non stock relevant value fields.
The stock relevant Variances are taken care by ML and my doubt is how to calculate the NON stock Relevant variance and take it to COPA?
Please advise.
Thanks
PM

Hi Praveen
I dont think you did the right thing... If the Non Stock relevant cost components were also calculated from CK11N, then what you did is not right
You should have simply mapped the Cost Comp Str for all the Cost Comp (STock relevant as well as Non Stock rel) to VF in KE4R...
At period end, you would execute CKMLCP, which would again calculate all the Cost Componnets.... You just need to execute KE27 to revaluate COGS in COPA...
I dont know why you used SD condion types to post the non stock relevant portions into COPA
BR,Ajay M

Running KE27. Getting an error " Condition type XX12 is not active"

Hi There -
When running KE27 getting an error Copa Validation: Condition Type XX12 is not active.
Appreciate your time.
Thanks
Sri

Hi Sri,
is this a standard erromessage? Which code (ex: XY123)?
br, Guido

KE27 Trasfer to COPA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for