KO88 Order Settlement Issue

Hi,
I have executed one production order in KO88,I am getting the below error.kindly advice me
ERROR MESSAGE:"CREATE COST ELEMENT FOR 403530"
I CANNOT CREATE COST ELEMENT FOR 403530-GAIN/LOSS PRODUCTION VARIANCE, BECAUSE IT WILL LEAD DUPLICATION IN CO-PA
Kindly advice me how to solve this issue.
Thanks
Supriya

Hi Supriya,
Why do you feel it will lead to duplication in CO-PA?
By the way is the Production Order is for Make to Stock? And is the Material is set to Standard cost or moving average?
Pl.provide more details
Regards,
Som

Similar Messages

Internal Order Settlement Issue (KO88)

Hi,
While doing KO88 to settle the internal order, the full amount of asset is not getting capitalised. My allocation structure and the settlement rule are correct.
For Eg. Asset Value = INR 1000000
            Down Payment = INR 200000
However, while doing KO88, the system should capitalise entire INR 1000000, but it capitalising only INR 800000.
the first line item shows                                 INR 1000000
the second line item shows                            INR 200000- (this amount is hitting some primary cost element configured in           the (OKEP Down payment - default cost element assignment) screen
the net amount (that will be capitalised =       INR 800000
can anybody assist me on this.........

Hi,
you can settle using "PER" settlement rule doing it period by period. Just key in the actual posting period in the field "posting period" in ko88.
Example: you are missing settlements from period 002/2009 to 009/2009, actual period is 011/2009. So you settle period 002/2009 with "PER" in posting period 011/2009. Aftre this had happened, settle 003/2009 to posting period 011/2009, and so on...
Best regards, Christian

Internal Order Settlement Issue

HI,
I have posted some entries in Postage internal orders. But when i tried to settle that in KO88, it is showing the below message.
No Transaction Data Posted Since Last Settlement
Actually once the client executed KO8G transaction for all orders. At that time 2 Orders was not settled. Now When i tried to settle them in KO88, It is giving the above message.
Why it is not getting settled? How to fix this error. Kindly help me
Thanks
Kishore

Dear,
Because these order are alreaddy settled. No balance on these order please check in KKBC_ORD. You can just settle additional amounts posted since last settlement.
For deatils refer this link,
Order Settlement
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Production Order settlement issue

Hi ,
We are planning to do re-work . We want to capture the labor activties for the order. Is it possible to settle the labor activties only for the order settlement ?
Thanks
Nic

Hi Nick,
From a business stand point you have two options to follow:
1. settle the costs to the original Production order
2. Settle the costs to seperate cost center
for both cases, you need to have seperate Production Order type. Because the settlement paratment are different from regular production order type.
So please use seperate Production order type with settlement profile being settlement to Cost Center.
Hope this will solve your issue
Best Regards
Surya

Prd Order Settlement Issue

Hi all,
While carrying out production order settlement for a production order, the system is determining the wrong GL A/C. Well it's deriving the GL A/C which does not exist. I need to change this assignment to a valid GL A/C. How am I suppose to fix this?
It's an MTO order, settlement cat. SDI. I'm not sure why the settlement rule is SDI for this specific order too, normally it should be MAT.
Regards,
G. Coelho

The valuation now is for sales order is incorrect. SDI means that the sales order stock is non-valuated and sales order is used to capture the costs. This is because the requirement class of the sales order is incorrect.
First check the requirement type in sales order (VA03). In procurement tab of the first main screen, it will show the requirement type for your sales order item.
Then check t-code OVZH, there will be a link between requirement type and requirement class.
Then check OVZG to check the requirement class.
(If you want to change, use the config.path Controlling -> Product Cost Controlling -> Cost Object Controlling -> Product Cost by Sales order -> Control for Sales-order-related Production... -> Check requirement class. Howeiver, this should be done after you consult with SD and CO consultant)
You will see the your requirement class. Check whether account assignment cat., and valuatio are both set to M (ind.cust.order w/o CO, and valuated sales order stock). I suspected that a sales order per your issue is set to non-valuated stock (Account Assignment E, valuation blank).
Hope it helps.
Edited by: ayethebing on Jul 16, 2010 1:34 PM

CO-Products Procees order settlement issue

Hi Gurus,
I've a Process order with Co-Product items my settlement rule says 100% PER to CTR (Cost Center) and 0% for OIT (Order Items). When I try to settle this order instead of posting variances to Settlement receiver it's posting Credit (Goods receipts) of order to cost center and debits to Header material's OBYC G/L account? Any ideas?? I did all the month-end closing steps such as CO8A, KKS1 and KO88 etc..
Thanks
RG

Hi,
Check the Sender or Receiver details in KO88 or CO88, You will Find your OLD GL Account. IF SO Check the Settlement Profile of the Production Order and from Settlement Profile check the Allocation Structure ,ther might the OLD GL Assigned in it. Remove it and replace with your new GL.
the above assignment will be the reason for geting Error in KO88 or CO88.
Thanks
Goutam
Edited by: Goutam78 on Jun 2, 2011 7:12 PM

Process order settlement issue

When we are settling process order to the material, which is having std price.The following entry is passed.
1) Price diffrence account- Debit/ credit (prd)
2)Inventory movement -Debit/ credit (gbb-vbr)
For point 2,the material code is not passed in FI doc.
Can ny one knows the reason for this?

FI docuemt gets generated with reference to the GL of the respective material, which is based on the Valuation class.
You can also try , by CHECKING "Material Origin" in costing 1 view of material master.

Work order settlement issue

Hi
I am not an expert in Work orders and appreciate your input.
A work order has been settled to a Sales order ( I can't understand the logic behind settling to a Sales Order). The Profit centre assigned to the sales order is wrong. I.e. they need it to be the same as that in the work order.
1) Is it possible to reverse the settlement and
2) change the profit centre in the Sales order
3) Change the settlement rule of the work order
The user informed the reason to settle the work order is just merely to close the work order. Is it mandatory to settle the work order in order to close. If so could you please explain the logic behind the requirement?
Thanks & Regards
Nadini

Hey Vanessa,
Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
Problem solved.
Do you see any other implications on this?
Thanks again.
Pradeep

Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88

Hi,
I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
Has anyone come across such a situation?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pradeep

Ashok,
Thanks for the reply.
We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
Thanks
Pradeep

Order settlement KO88

Hallo Friend,
I am going for Order Settlement KO88. getting error massage If any one face this massage than please tell me Solution.
FI/CO interface: Balance in transaction currency
Message no. RW022
Diagnosis
The balances in transaction currency must be zero for each logical transaction when transferring to the FI/CO interface. A balance of " 39.001,60-" "INR" was determined for the logical transaction "000001".
System Response
The FI/CO interface does not process any transactions which have a balance in transaction currency other than zero.
Procedure
This is a system error of the calling application.

Hi, Check below SAP notes regarding this issue:
1523814 Transaction AIST ends with error RW022
1514384 Error message RW022
1444750 Postings without transaction currency

KO88/CO88 Production Order Settlement Requires CO Object

Dear SAP Experts,
My client has two different plants (2000 and 2100). This is the first month end for 2100.
We are trying to settle Production Orders for both the plants. There is no issue relating to 2000 but for 2100, we are having an error "Account 52601 requires an assignment to a CO object - Message no. KI235".
Please guide on how to solve this error.
Best Regards...

Dear SAP Experts,
Thanks for the comments you all made on my posts.
The error is now solved. I'll brief so that in future, if error like again appears for someone else, they may even check the following:
The issue was that on running KO88/ CO88, there was an error stating GL Account requires Cost Object msg KI235.
On analysing the error, it was found that GL accounts appear from OBYC GBB-AUF which is the account for order settlement and again in OBYC PRD the account for price difference.
It was identified that the same accounts were assigned to both the keys. Price Difference accounts does not have cost element whereas the other account coming from GBB-AUF has Cost Element and the cost object being the Order itself.
The issue was resolved by changing the account assignment on PRD. The new account assigned was Price difference.
Thanks and Regards...

Update COPA characteristic values during order settlement - KO88

Hi,
We need to update some COPA characteristic values during order settlement using T-code KO88.
Looked for options in KEDR transaction, did not find any exits.
Could some one help us to resolve this issue.
Thanks
Vikram

Hello and thanks for your response.
We have actually created the new characteristic (WWCRE) and we are populating it in the user exit. I think the issue is that the characteristic may be 05012010 at the time of the sales order, but it is 04012010 at the time of billing.
Unfortunately, the PAOBJNR in the billing doc is the same as the order and the user exit doesn't seem to accept the changed value or create a new entry in the CE tables.
For example, if I change the sales order to cause a new WWCRE value, the system automatically generates a new PAOBJNR but at the time of billing, regardless of changes to the values, it simply keeps the old PAOBJNR from the sales order and doesn't reflect the changes.
I hope that makes some sense. Please let me know if you have any other suggestions.
>Ray

Re: Issue while doing Order Settlement

Hi Experts,
I have completed the goods reciept step for a process order.
Now I am trying to do the following steps for the order settlement.
1.Calculate Overheads using Tcode : KGI2 - Individual Processing
CO43 - Collective Processing
2.Calculate WIP using Tcode : KKAX - Individual Processing
KKAO - Collective Processing
3.Calculate Variance by using Tcode : KKS2 - Individual Processing
KKS1 - Collective Processing
4.Finally do the settlement of Order in Tcode : KO88 - Individual Processing
CO88 - Collective Processing
I am not able to do these steps.
KGI2: the screen is appearing without any details,but there is no error message.
KKS2: Here all the cost are coming zero.
KO88: I am getting this message: There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible.
Please advice.
Regards,
Vivek

Dear,
Message no KD256??
You will just check for customization settings for accrual calculation ie cheak for settelement to fiin the result analysis version and check posting rules
Maintain the config in OKG8 for RA category "RUCR".
Check this OSS note 179533
Also check order previously settled?
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

PROCESS ORDER SETTLEMENT - KO88

Hi!
As per my knowledge KO88 will be done for OHDS and for Material. OHDS settlement will be done in month ending which results the difference between KSII and KP26.
Can anybody explain how the accounting entry will be generated at the time of Process order settlement of material i.e. KO88.
Sreenivas

Hi
Settlement entries are same as in production order. No diff
However, u must be aware settlement entries are dependent on status of process order. If status is DLV or TECO wip is calcelled and variances are calculated. If status if PREL or REL or PDLV wip entries are posted.
Hope you have made settings in WIP for offsetting entries
Pls assign points if this clarifies else send query with more explanation

KO88 Internal Order Settlement

Hi All,
Internal order Settlement rule has Asset under construction .
Current year cost has been settled to AUC. However an cost belonging to last year Dec 2006 is not settled to AUC.
This cost is available in Line item of Internal order in Tcode : KOb1 for the previous year 2006. For the current year 2007 the balance of the order is Zero as all cost are settled through T code: KO8G
We tried settling the cost to period 12 year 2007 in KO88 system said Settle the balance from previous year in the previous year first. We have applied SAP note: 819197. Now we are getting another error AUC not completely credited.
Can you provide your inputs
Thanks

KO88 is a Period end activities, after each month nend you have to mandatorily run KO88 settlement.
select Posting period 05 and do the settlement.
Reagrds,
Alok

KO88 Order Settlement Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for