Work order settlement issue

Hi
I am not an expert in Work orders and appreciate your input.
A work order has been settled to a Sales order ( I can't understand the logic behind settling to a Sales Order). The Profit centre assigned to the sales order is wrong. I.e. they need it to be the same as that in the work order.
1) Is it possible to reverse the settlement and
2) change the profit centre in the Sales order
3) Change the settlement rule of the work order
The user informed the reason to settle the work order is just merely to close the work order. Is it mandatory to settle the work order in order to close. If so could you please explain the logic behind the requirement?
Thanks & Regards
Nadini

Hey Vanessa,
Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
Problem solved.
Do you see any other implications on this?
Thanks again.
Pradeep

Similar Messages

  • KO8G open work order settlement

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep
    Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AM

    Hey Vanessa,
    Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
    I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
    The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
    Problem solved.
    Do you see any other implications on this?
    Thanks again.
    Pradeep

  • Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep

    Ashok,
    Thanks for the reply.
    We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
    Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
    Thanks
    Pradeep

  • Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error

    Workflow Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error, but settlement is done no problem in updation. But notification error there.
    Notification of completion cannot be generated
    Problems occurred when generating a mail
    Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
    Error handling for work item 000112476185
    Work item 000112476185: Object 000020154849 method UPDATESETTLEMENTRULE cannot be executed
    Call transaction was canceled.
    No errors occurred -> Details in long text
    No errors occurred -> Details in long text
    Please advice what could be the reason this error.
    Best Regards,
    Prabhakar

    Message no. WL821
    Message no. FD009
    Message no. WL863
    Problems occurred when generating a mail
    Message no. SWF_RUN534
    Error handling for work item 000133673828
    Message no. SWF_RUN630
    Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
    Message no. SWF_RUN535
    Thanks,
    Prabhakar

  • Defaulting G/L account in work order settlement rule

    Hello,
    I have set my work order settlement profile, the default object to be G/L.  However, in the equipment master record, at the Organization tab (account assignment group), i don't see any field for G/L account.
    When i create settlement rule with default, i get error that rule cannot be created with default.
    Where can i enter the G/L account in the equipment master to enable the auto settlement rule creation?

    you can always explain the concept of FI account through Cost Center and CO account through Cost Element from Plant Maintenance and FI/CO organisation point of view and in relation to business process.
    As you cant define in master data you cant get it automatically copied into settlement rule and hence have to maintain it manually as system dont know which GL to use as settlement receiver as not maintained in master data.

  • Reverse work order settlements

    Experts,
    I need to reverse all the work order settlements that were done in a month due to some error - Appreciate it if someone can let me know how to take care of this.
    All answers/inputs/thoughts will be duly appreciated and rewarded with points.
    Thanks,
    Nandita

    KO8G

  • Work order settled without functional area

    Hello All,
    We are getting an issue here, business is trying to settle a workorder by posting it through KO8G.
    When the posting is done we cannot see the Functional area on the Debit Line (40), and the credit line has the work order, profit center and functional area. As the debit line does not have functional area, the data does not match in BI.
    Could anyone please elaborate how can we get the FA on both the lines.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Tushar Nerlekar

    When you issue inventory to service order, the journal entry is
    Dr Consumption + Production Order (Functional area derived from order type)
    Cr Inventory (B/S account doesn't need CO object assignment)
    When the order settles, the accounting entry is:
    Dr Consumption + Cost Center (Functional area derived from cost center master data)
    Cr Consumption + Production Order (Functional area derived from order type)
    In Iw33, check in Go To -> Settlement Rule at header level what is the settlement receiver?

  • Production Order settlement issue

    Hi ,
    We are planning to do re-work . We want to capture the labor activties for the order. Is it possible to settle the labor activties only for the order settlement ?
    Thanks
    Nic

    Hi Nick,
    From a business stand point you have two options to follow:
    1. settle the costs to the original Production order
    2. Settle the costs to seperate cost center
    for both cases, you need to have seperate Production Order type. Because the settlement paratment are different from regular production order type.
    So please use seperate Production order type with settlement profile being settlement to Cost Center.
    Hope this will solve your issue
    Best Regards
    Surya

  • Work Order Settlement Rule Determination

    Hi Experts,
    For T-code : IW32, can any one suggest any enhancements which triggers during following conditions:
    1)While Releasing the Work order.
    2)To redetemine settlement Rule i.e. I need to over wrtie a filed in Settlement rule i.e. "Setllement Reciever" with Cost center value.
    3) Overwrite the default costcenter value in Location Tab with custom field value.
    Thanks in advance,
    With regards.

    Hi Vani.
    You must use either EXIT_SAPLCOIH_009 user exit or must configure workflow (STD object ISUSMORDER) .
    Thanx
    suresh.

  • Prd Order Settlement Issue

    Hi all,
    While carrying out production order settlement for a production order, the system is determining the wrong GL A/C. Well it's deriving the GL A/C which does not exist. I need to change this assignment to a valid GL A/C. How am I suppose to fix this?
    It's an MTO order, settlement cat. SDI. I'm not sure why the settlement rule is SDI for this specific order too, normally it should be MAT.
    Regards,
    G. Coelho

    The valuation now is for sales order is incorrect.   SDI means that the sales order stock is non-valuated and sales order is used to capture the costs.  This is because the requirement class of the sales order is incorrect.
    First check the requirement type in sales order (VA03).  In procurement tab of the first main screen, it will show the requirement type for your sales order item.
    Then check t-code OVZH, there will be a link between requirement type and requirement class.
    Then check OVZG to check the requirement class.
    (If you want to change, use the config.path Controlling -> Product Cost Controlling -> Cost Object Controlling -> Product Cost by Sales order -> Control for Sales-order-related Production... -> Check requirement class.  Howeiver, this should be done after you consult with SD and CO consultant)
    You will see the your requirement class.  Check whether account assignment cat., and valuatio are both set to M (ind.cust.order w/o CO, and valuated sales order stock).  I suspected that a sales order per your issue is set to non-valuated stock (Account Assignment E, valuation blank).
    Hope it helps.
    Edited by: ayethebing on Jul 16, 2010 1:34 PM

  • Error in servcie work order Settlement

    We have tried to process the Settlement for FCOs Service Work Orders and Warranty Contracts but we get the following error message
    "Account 6810100 requires an assignment to a CO object".
    I have detected that this GL account has been created as cost element from January 2010, but as far I know the GL accounts that belong to settlement process must not be created as cost element.
    Now pls help how to resolve this problem
    Rgd
    Prakash Sharma

    Hi
    You are right ..
    I checked cost element  6810100  user made following change ,
    In cost element master from 01.01.2010  to 31.12.9999     .- Cost element category is- 1  Primary costs/cost-reducing revenues and earlier  from 01.01.2000 to  31.12.2002 Cost element category is- 22 External settlement  and also in default account assignment cost center is not assigned.
    I just want to know error is coming because default account assignment is not given  and also  because of  change in cost element category
    Rgd Prakash

  • Frame work order po issue

    Hi
    I have created  frame work order purchase order, service entry sheet and invoice also completed then i reverse the invoice
    and reverse service entry sheet then i delete serve entry sheet also.so i need to delete po in me22n t.code during deletion
    that time showing error  Purchase Order item can not be deleted, Message no. ME303 there is no pending for release approval
    also.plz suggest.
    Regards
    Sam

    Hi,
    Why did you create a SES for a Framework Order, SAP Framework order does not need any GR/SES.
    Process is Framework Order > Invoices.
    Two way match.
    Thanks

  • Internal Order Settlement Issue

    HI,
    I have posted some entries in Postage internal orders. But when i tried to settle that in KO88, it is showing the below message.
    No Transaction Data Posted Since Last Settlement
    Actually once the client executed KO8G transaction for all orders. At that time 2 Orders was not settled. Now When i tried to settle them in KO88, It is giving the above message.
    Why it is not getting settled? How to fix this error. Kindly help me
    Thanks
    Kishore

    Dear,
    Because these order are alreaddy settled. No balance on these order please check in KKBC_ORD. You can just settle additional amounts posted since last settlement.
    For deatils refer this link,
    Order Settlement
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • EAM Work order completion issue

    Hi guys
    We have a requirement where we need to complete a work order using an API call .
    There are times where even when all operations are completed the users dont change the status to complete.
    I've tried using the EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.PROCESS_WO to change the status to different statuses and it works for some statuses,
    but when I try to change the status of the WO from released to complete it gives me the following error.
    change from 3 to 4 not poss
    oddly this call does change the system status of the work order to complete but not the status type
    any ideas , suggestions?
    Thanks
    Dan

    user eam_completion API
    take care
    Aamir

  • Work order material issue request error

    In Oracle EAM Maintenance super user responsibility i am getting following error while trying to request material issue
    " Picking rule fails to find a source locator that meets the rules restrictions "
    what went wrong? could any one explain

    963731 wrote:
    In Oracle EAM Maintenance super user responsibility i am getting following error while trying to request material issue
    " Picking rule fails to find a source locator that meets the rules restrictions "
    what went wrong? could any one explainPlease see these docs.
    WMS Short Pick Is Not Working With Tasks Having an Allocated LPN get ORA-01086 save point Error [ID 1097883.1]
    Rules Engine Does Not Allocate Move Orders From Non - Reservable Subinventory [ID 338458.1]
    Receive Error |WMS_MULT_LPN_ERROR|WMS_START_WORKFLOW_FAILED|Invalid cycle count header specified On Curtail Pick Exception [ID 1101114.1]
    Thnaks,
    Hussein

Maybe you are looking for