Lens Detection - SIGMA 18-250mm F3.5-6,3 DC Makro OS HSM

Hi Guys
I recently purchased the lens mentioned above as a universal and travel lens.
I did some shots to day and imported them into LR4.
By Default I always do lens correction when importing but LR4 detects this lens as "18-150" only, no make, no model.
I first thought: "damned, again this problem, I had it with that stupid Tamron lens" .... but the I did an import with the same raw (CR2) pictures in Apple Aperture and I get the correct lens data here:
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks for your help.
andre

Was some kind of a preset (called "Lens Correction") applied at the tiime of import? That is what the first line in the History suggests to me.
However, just because it was called that, does not mean that it has succeeded in correcting the image. Perhaps it was intended to turn on profiled corrections but did not, or perhaps those were turned off subsequently somehow (paste settings, sync, auto-sync, another preset, something of those kinds).
If you want to see the outcome of using that preset at that time. (as opposed to, what happened to the image subsequently) then you can click on that topmost stage in the image History, and see what the various image settings then show. (Important: don't actually adjust anything at all until you have clicked back "forward" again to the lowest entry in the History, or else you will lose all these subsequent History steps.)
When lens profile correction is turned on (either by your LR defaults, as customised by the user, or else by a preset, or else manually) then in order for this profile to be applied to the image, firstly the lens used has to be recognised and associated with a particular profile. 
Even if no usable profile is found, though, for a given image - whether manually selected Custom, Auto, or Default (which also pays attention to the user's customised assignments) - the state of this Enable checkbox should persist anyway, AFAIK.
If that was formerly on and then turned off, this will be evident somewhere in the image's full History - provided that survives.
I suppose that if the earliest History of your image pre-dates the introduction of the profiled lens corrections feature, the "Lens Correction" reference may relate to pure manual lens corrections. I used, long ago, to run a series of presets each directly applying barrel, vignetting and CA adjustments which I had "eyeballed" and then saved against one of my lenses. With later versions of LR, it is enough to turn on profiled correction generally, then each image will get whatever is the needed profile applied.
So I now need only one import preset to do that, instead of several antique lens-specific ones (I find it better to do it this way, than through LR processing defaults). But that antique metadata wqould not provide for the enabling of any profile - since such things were not yet heard of at the time - and profiles are not automatically turned on when you bring images up to a newer process version. You would have to actively make that happen - cancelling those earlier manual corrections.
hth - RP

Similar Messages

  • Sigma 18-250mm f3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM

    Sigma released a new lens this month (July 2012)
    Sigma 18-250mm f3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM (not to be confused with the "Sigma 18-250mm f3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM" )
    So I was wondering when you might update the "Lens Corrections" Profile to reflect the new lens.
    Thanks in advance

    Thanks McLion for taking the time to answer my question.  I was just worried that the similarity in the lens names might be cause for them to overlook the new lens, which is lighter and smaller than it's older brother. 

  • Lens adapter Sigma to Canon

    Hi all,
    I have a Canon T3i and recently bought lens Sigma 24-135mm f/2.8-4.5, but I just realized that it doesn't fit in my camera.
    I would like to know if I can easily find an adapter and which one could be. I found one in Amazon, but I'm not sure if works to my camera, because in the description says that is for EOS.
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CWXO64E/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A1S9OMG83CAC4S
    Please help me, if I cannot find an adapter I have to return the lens, and I have just some days to do it.
    Thank you.

    An adapter is not the answer.  You will hate it even if there is such a thing.  Adapters rarely work well in any case.
    If it is "recently bought" you should be able to exchange it.  Really your only option.
    Possibly, you bought it used since it is a discontinued lens.  So, in that case you should try to resell it after you determine whcih mount you have.  Don't waste any time or money on an adapter.
    EOS 1Ds Mk III, EOS 1D Mk IV EF 50mm f1.2 L, EF 24-70mm f2.8 L,
    EF 70-200mm f2.8 L IS II, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 EX APO
    Photoshop CS6, ACR 8.7, Lightroom 5.7

  • Pentax K5 and lens detection

    Hello,
    I have noticed since some LR revision that we have a problem in automatic lense detection(even in raw) with the pentax K-5 and some lens :
    pentax SMC DA 18-55 3.5-5.6 AL WR : DNG ok, PEF ok
    pentax SMC DA 50-200 4-5.6 ED WR : DNG ko, PEF ko
    pentax SMC DFA 100 2.8 macro WR : DNG ko, PEF ko
    for those ko lens if I chose pentax in manufacturer list it detects the correct lens model.
    In can supply images if you need to correct those bugs.
    Regards

    My first question is why are you converting to DNG before importing into Aperture? It appears that Aperture should support the RAW files from that camera.
    Second question is how familiar are you with the whole concept of RAW images?  You realize that none of the camera settings (apart from shutter speed and aperture) affect the digital RAW file. 
    One of the strengths and reasons for shooting RAW is the ability to adjust white balance after the shoot. JPG images are extremely limited in their ability to have there white balance adjusted.
    RAW conversion software is as much art as science, which is why no two RAW conversion programs will render an image in exactly the same way.
    So I would first eliminate the DNG step and then see how that affects the workflow.
    regards

  • Aperture 3.6 recognises Tamron 70-200 f2.8 lens as Sigma 24-105 f/4

    I have been using the Tamron 70-200 F2.8 VC Di lens for over a year, along with Aperture 3, which correctly identified the lens in its metadata tag. However, in the past few weeks, I notice that this lens is represented as Sigma A 24- 105 f/4 lens. All other data is correct, e.g. focal length of image, aperture, ISO etc. 
    Not sure why this is happening, any clues on how to rectify this?

    The EXIF tags set by the cameras are not unique. The manufacturers are using their own codes, and that may be ambiguous. In case of a conflict, Aperture will use one of the possibilities.  There have been several reports about incorrectly identified lenses.
    Not sure why this is happening, any clues on how to rectify this?
    Did you update any software recently, for example update the RAW support?
    Send a bug report to Apple, and report the wrong tag.  You can use the feedback form:  Apple - Aperture - Feedback
    The only other alternative would be to use exiftool to change the EXIF tags of the originals.  (Modifying EXIF tags of Originals Using exiftool: camera, lens, gps)  But before going to that trouble, I'd wait, if Apple will fix the bug with the next RAW support update.

  • I Like LR v4.2. My Reasons:

    1) I render my previews at 1:1 during import. It appears that v4.2 renders at a higher speed. It is noticeable to me.
    2) When in the develop module, the speed in loading an image has improved by about 50%. Initially opening the develop module has not changed speed-wise, but once in there, it is a definite speed improvement.

    New in 4.2:
    New Camera Support in Lightroom 4.2:
    Canon EOS 650D / Rebel T4i 
    Canon EOS M 
    Fujifilm XF1 
    Fujifilm X-E1 
    Fuji FinePix F800EXR 
    Leaf Credo 40 
    Leaf Credo 60 
    Leica S 
    Leica D-LUX 6 
    Leica V-LUX 4 
    Nikon Coolpix P7700 
    Nikon 1 J2 
    Nikon D600* 
    Panasonic DMC-G5 
    Panasonic DMC-LX7 
    Panasonic DMC-FZ200 
    Pentax K-30 
    Samsung EX2F 
    Sony Alpha NEX-5R 
    Sony Alpha NEX-6 
    Sony Alpha SLT-A99V 
    Sony DSC-RX100
      * Please note that the support for Nikon D600 is preliminary and there is a minor risk that the appearance of your images may change when the final support for Nikon D600 is available in an upcoming release. 
    Newly supported cameras for tethered capture:
    Canon EOS Kiss X5 
    Canon EOS Kiss REBEL T3i 
    Canon EOS 600D 
    Canon EOS Kiss X50 
    Canon EOS REBEL T3 
    Canon EOS 1100D 
    Canon EOS 5D Mark III 
    Canon EOS 1D X 
    Nikon D4 
    Nikon D800 
    Nikon D800e
    New Lens Profile Support in Lightroom 4.2:
    Lens Name
    Lens Mount
    Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM
    Canon
    Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 IS USM
    Canon
    Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM
    Canon
    Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM
    Canon
    Canon EF-M 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
    Canon
    Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
    Canon
    Sigma 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM
    Canon
    Zeiss Distagon T* 2/25 ZE
    Canon
    Zeiss Distagon T* 1,4/35 ZE
    Canon
    LEICA APO-SUMMICRON-M 50 mm f/2 ASPH.
    Leica
    LEICA APO MACRO SUMMARIT-S 120 mm f/2.5 (CS)
    Leica
    LEICA ELMARIT-S 30 mm f/2.8 ASPH. (CS)
    Leica
    LEICA SUMMARIT-S 35 mm f/2.5 ASPH. (CS)
    Leica
    LEICA SUMMARIT-S 70 mm f/2.5 ASPH. (CS)
    Leica
    LEICA APO ELMAR-S 180 mm f/3.5 (CS)
    Leica
    LEICA VARIO-ELMAR-S 30-90 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH.
    Leica
    LEICA SUPER-ELMAR-S 24 mm f/3.5 ASPH
    Leica
    Hasselblad HCD 4/28
    Leica
    Hasselblad HC 3,5/35
    Leica
    Hasselblad HC 3,5/50
    Leica
    Hasselblad HC 2,8/80
    Leica
    Hasselblad HC 2,2/100
    Leica
    Hasselblad HC Macro 4/120
    Leica
    Hasselblad HC 3,2/150
    Leica
    Hasselblad HC 4/210
    Leica
    Hasselblad HC 4,5/300
    Leica
    Hasselblad HC 3,5-4,5/50-110
    Leica
    Hasselblad HCD 4-5,6/35-90
    Leica
    Nikon 1 NIKKOR 11-27.5mm f/3.5-5.6
    Nikon
    Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR
    Nikon
    Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR
    Nikon
    Sigma 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM
    Nikon
    Tamron SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD A007N
    Nikon
    Zeiss Distagon T* 2/25 ZF.2
    Nikon
    Zeiss Distagon T* 1,4/35 ZF.2
    Nikon
    Pentax smc DA 40mm F2.8 XS
    Pentax
    Pentax smc DA 50mm F1.8
    Pentax
    Pentax smc DA 645 25mm F4 AL (IF) SDM AW
    Pentax
    Pentax smc D FA 645 25mm f/4 AL (IF) SDM AW
    Pentax
    Sigma 18-50mm F2.8-4.5 DC HSM
    Pentax
    Sigma 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM
    Sigma
    Sigma 18-50mm F2.8-4.5 DC HSM
    Sony
    Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro
    Sony
    Enough new for me !
    Frans

  • Lightroom - Lens Correction - Lens Manufactuer unknown

    I have a Canon Rebel XTi and shoot in Raw. I have 3 Tamron lenses - a 10-24, 17-50 and 18-270.
    I thought I'd try out the lens correction profile for my 10-24 for a few pics, but when invoking the option, it was unable to determine the len manufacturer. Though as soon as I selected 'Tamron' it then knew which lens I was using.
    Should my metadata have capture the lens manufactuer?
    Is there something I am missing?
    Given they are all Tamron - can I set some sort of default so I don't have to select Tamron for every picture?
    Thanks!

    If you cannot get the right lens profile assigned using the Set Default method described in earlier posts (for example, if two different lenses that you use are identified exactly the same by LR's reading of the image metadata, so that it cannot distinguish them automatically) then it can be helpful to record the manual assignment of a given lens profile, into a Develop preset for easier application to images in the future.
    To reiterate, it is enough that Lr's lens detection operates as a unique identifier, that can cause the particular correction profile to be used which you have stipulated; the actual lens description does not strictly need to be correct for the lens, in order for this to happen automatically, per image, at import or subsequently.
    So a general Develop preset or default which turns on lens corrections just needs to activate the profile checkbox, and in the Profile: selector, show "Default". Then LR uses whatever it has been told is the right default for each Lens ID encountered, which may derive from its originally installed list, or else from what the user has later assigned.
    A specific preset applying a particular lens profile for cases where auto detection doesn't work, will instead apply this explicitly, set as "Manual".
    For example, I use some older, pre-digital Pentax lenses which have no ID chip, and report to LR as just "A series lens" or else "K or M lens" - because all the camera can do, is detect whether or not these older lenses have an auto aperture. So with those, I can use LR to filter them down by focal length (prime lenses), to help me rapidly apply a Develop preset which picks out the correct profile for each individual lens. The camera asks me for the focal length whenver it detects a legacy-mount lens has been fitted, so that it can correctly apply shake reduction, so that info is at least recorded against each image. But: most of the time, I use only one A series lens and only one M series lens, so I have LR set to "presume" the A/28 profile for the former, and the M/135 profile for the latter, unless told otherwise. I only have to intervene as described in the exceptional case, when I know I have used some other lens sharing the same class of legacy mount.
    The same principles apply when third-party lens makers use ambiguous Lens IDs even for modern chipped lenses, where these codes may span across multiple, different lens models indiscriminately.
    RP

  • Lost lens profiles in LR 4-5

    Recently Lightroom no longer finds my lens profile (sigma 17-50mm) on new pictures.  Same camera, same lens, same file format.  It can still use the profile on older pictures but newer pictures it only shows like 5 lens profiles vs the 50+ that were there before.  Similiar behavior on the canon side.   By the way it seems to have lost the ability to see many other lens manufacturers to on the newer pictures.
    So I know the profiles are physically on the system.  I know I can see them in older pictures just not newer ones on the same library.  No update I can think of correlates to the change either.
    Canon 60D jpg & raw, Sigma 17-50mm f2.8
    Lightroom 4 and now also the new lightroom 5.
    Thoughts ?

    Oh I should have known better...yes it was. Why that didn't jump out at me I don't know.
    I modified the RAW profile for jpg and dropped it in
    C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0\Downloaded,
    and I am off to the races.

  • Need a Sigma zoom profile--Sigma DG  50-500mm  4.5-6.3 APO

    Does anyone have this lens profile:   Sigma DG  50 - 500 mm  4.5 - 6.3 APO or can Adobe create this for me? I take photos of birds, and I use the following:
    Canon 7D
    My lenses are:     Sigma DC 18 - 250   3.5-6.3 HSM---I have this lens in Camera Raw
    However I cannot find the lens:  Sigma DG  50 - 500 mm  4.5 -6.3  APO at all in Camera Raw for me to select.
    I do not know how to create a profile, so would someone be kind enough to create one for me? I need it ASAP.
    Thanks for your time.
    98 cam

    Here are the RAW-only lens profile files that ship with Lightroom 3.4 RC, where it looks like the Olympus is the camera-brand that doesn't have the 4.5-6.3 version of the lens:
    03/08/2011  04:37 PM         1,443,084 Canon (SIGMA APO 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM) - RAW.lcp
    03/08/2011  04:37 PM           844,369 Canon (Sigma_50-500mm_F4-6.3_APO_EX_DG_HSM ) - RAW.lcp
    03/08/2011  04:37 PM         1,460,076 NIKON CORPORATION (SIGMA APO 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM) - RAW.lcp
    03/08/2011  04:37 PM           607,951 NIKON CORPORATION (Sigma_50-500mm_F4-6.3_APO_EX_DG_HSM ) - RAW.lcp
    03/08/2011  04:37 PM           846,553 OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP (Sigma_50-500mm_F4-6.3_APO_EX_DG_HSM ) - RAW.lcp
    03/08/2011  04:37 PM         1,405,644 PENTAX (SIGMA APO 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM) - RAW.lcp
    03/08/2011  04:37 PM           822,529 PENTAX (Sigma_50-500mm_F4-6.3_APO_EX_DG_HSM ) - RAW.lcp
    03/08/2011  04:37 PM         1,387,212 SIGMA (SIGMA APO 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM) - RAW.lcp
    03/08/2011  04:37 PM           811,777 SIGMA (Sigma_50-500mm_F4-6.3_APO_EX_DG_HSM ) - RAW.lcp
    03/08/2011  04:37 PM         1,386,348 SONY (SIGMA APO 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM) - RAW.lcp
    03/08/2011  04:37 PM           811,273 SONY (Sigma_50-500mm_F4-6.3_APO_EX_DG_HSM ) - RAW.lcp

  • Lens recognised in Photoshop CS5 but not in Lightroom 3

    Automatic lens correction recognises my camera make and lens ( Sony - sigma 18 -250) in Photoshop CS5 but not in Lightroom 3. In fact the lens is not even listed in Lightroom.
    Is there a way to update Lightroom with the Photoshop data?

    I don't think Photoshop's plugin filters by file type - it just throw all the profiles at you, but uses exif lens data to pre-select the bes matching.
    I think it makes sense, since after opening a file, be it raw or jpeg, in Photoshop, the program cannot be sure about the provenience of data. So it relies on user to make the right choice.

  • DSLR + lens for the beginning

    Hi guys, 
    I like photography and feel I am ready for my first DSLR (I used only Point-an-shoot cameras before). Read a lot of reviews and discussions but things are still not clear for me which camera and lens to get. My budget is around $1500. I am planning to take portraits (and some weddings perhaps) and some landscape pics (just for pleasure from time to time). Also if possible I'd like to grow with my camera so it should not necessary be a camera for noob, I am willing to learn.
    So, I found 2 lenses - Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens and Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Lens (Both are prime, must provide a nice pic in a bad light, fast and sharp). The price for Sigma is 2 times higher then Canon. Does the difference really cost these money? Since there is a rule "better buy more expensive lens then camera" I don't mind to spend more on Sigma, but should I? Also is it better to get 50mm or 35mm considering I am going to use with crop sensor camera?
    I can't afford full-frame camera right now, so depends on which lens I'm going to get there is some options with camera: Canon 70D, 7d or T3i.
    I would be happy to hear some advice and thank you in advance.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    His budget I think is for Camera + Lens (at least one). Yes, he can buy 6D full frame for $1500 now, but that is without any lens.
    Weekend Travelers Blog | Eastern Sierra Fall Color Guide

  • Teleconverter for 600D with Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 EX DG OS HSM?

    I've been reading that 2x teleconverters aren't that great. That they can cause a lot of image quality loss as well as slowing down or even stopping auto focus from working altogether. What do I need to know about teleconverters to make an educated purchase?
    Thanks,
    Cg.
    Canon 6D,Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM, Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM, Sigma 1.4 x EX DG Teleconverter, Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro USM, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8, EF 40mm f/2.8 pancake, Sigma AF 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM, Pentax 400mm f/5.6

    Anytime you add anything into the light path of any lens, you are going to degrade the image quality. Now, that may be a slight or it can be a significant loss.
    I have always subscribed to using the original manufacturers accessories and in this case I still think so.
    Sigma makes two tele converters that will work with your lens. Both are designed for your lens and retain all features including AF.
    The Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 EX DG OS HSM is of such high quality it has room to give up a small amount of IQ, introduced by the tele converter, and still be better that some 70-200mm without one.
    Another consideration is how big do you intend to make the prints? Do you use a tripod?
    So you must weigh all the factors of IQ and cost plus slower AF, etc, and decide if it is for you.
    I recommend the 1.4x over the 2x, though.
    EOS 1Ds Mk III, EOS 1D Mk IV EF 50mm f1.2 L, EF 24-70mm f2.8 L,
    EF 70-200mm f2.8 L IS II, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 EX APO
    Photoshop CS6, ACR 8.7, Lightroom 5.7

  • Lens profiles now gone...

    all my lens profiles in LR3 are now gone.  The complete list used to show up, but now only one shows up and it's not one i have.  how do i get the list back that comes with lightroom?

    Perhaps you are viewing a different kind of image than previously. There is a distinction between lens support for a camera Raw, and for a camera JPG (or other bitmap format) file.
    For many lenses, only a Raw-compatible profile is supplied with Lightroom - on the other hand, some of the profiles are JPG-only, e.g. for some cameras with fixed lenses that may not shoot Raw at all.
    It is possible to download further profiles, to generate them yourself using a utility, or to "kludge" convert a copy of an existing Raw-only profile such that it shows up for JPG images.
    The profiles list shown in the Lens Corrections panel, is filtered according to whichever type of image is currently selected. And any automatic lens detection needs to come from that list.
    Do the expected profiles still show, when you work with other types of image?

  • Aperture 2.1 not recognizing my Sigma 120-300 F2.8 APO EX IF HSM DG

    It gives me this as my lens used: Sigma 17-35mm f2.8-4 EX Aspherical HSM which of course is not even close.
    Can an admin let the people know about this one. It would really help to get this corrected.
    Thanks

    Use Aperture's "submit feedback" option to report this. There is no admin here reporting bugs to the Aperture team.

  • Best reasonably priced macro lens for a 70d

    Hi i have got a canon 70d and have just started doing alot of macro photography (Flowers bugs etc) i've been using the the 18-135mm kit lens but now i know im enjoying it im going to get a mocro lens. Cant afford nothing to major as saving for wedding and house. Was just looking for some advice on reasonably priced macro lenses. Any Advice welcome..
    Thanks in advance
    Darren 

    amfoto1 wrote:
    Actually, it's hard to go wrong with macro lenses... Most give excellent image quality, so it tends to be the other features that are deciding factors. I have no idea what you consider "reasonably priced".... To one person that might be no more than $100, while to another it might be anything under $1000.
    Canon EF 50/2.5 Compact Macro is currently about $270... As an EF lens, this can be used on both your crop camera and on full frame cameras. But this is a micro motor focus drive lens (slower, hunts more), and on it's own it only goes to 1:2 or one half life size magnification. To get full 1:1 magnification with it, there's a separately sold converter that costs another $270. You also could use macro exension tubes - that sell for between $70 and $200 for a set - to increase the lens' magnification. All the other macro lenses listed here are able to do 1:1 without need for any adapter. 50mm is fairly short focal length, putting you relatively close to your subject. This lens' closest focus is about 4 inches (with 1:1 adapter... compare to 12 inches with a 100mm lens). Personally I use shorter macro focal lengths mostly in-studio where they can work well.... but prefer a longer focal length in the field. Uses 52mm filters. No lens hood offered or supplied, it doesn't really need one because the front element is deeply recessed into the lens.
    SIgma 50/2.8 Macro lens sells for about $350. I don't know much about this lens, it's been around for a while. I know it's 1:1 capable, both crop and full frame capable and has a micro motor focus drive. Comes with a lens hood. Uses 55mm filters.
    Canon EF-S 60/2.8 USM Macro is on sale at the moment for $420. It's an EF-S lens, which will work fine on your 70D, but is not usable on a full frame camera. USM focusing drive is a bit faster, quieter and more precise (see below about focus speed). It's full 1:1 capable, a little longer focal length than 50mm, but not a lot. It's relatively compact and it is "internal focusing" or IF, which means it doesn't change length when focused. It uses 58mm filters and the matched lens hood sells separately for $24 (third party hoods are available for less).
    Tamron  SP 60/2.0 "Di II"  Macro/Portrait lens is selling for about $525 and, like the Canon 60mm Macro, is a "crop only" lens. Fine for your 70D, but not usable on full frame cameras. It's also IF, but using a micro motor type focus drive. I've been working with one of these lately, giving it a try. I find it's focus slower than Canon USM, but generally plenty fast  for most macro/portrait usage. The main attraction of this lens is its f2.0 aperture... fully a stop larger than most other macro lenses (Zeiss makes a couple f2.0 macro lenses, but they are manual focus only and quite expensive). This is nice particularly when using the lens for portraiture. It uses 55mm filters and comes with a lens hood.
    Canon MP-E 65mm is not a lens I'd recommend to anyone just starting out shooting macro. This is an ultra high magnification lens... actually can do no less than 1:1 and goes as high as 5:1. That's a range well beyond what many people shoot. It's also about $1000 and stricly manual focus. It's a superb lens, usable on both crop sensor and full frame cameras, and one I use personally. But it's still not something I'd recommend to anyone just starting to shoot macro. It's rather challenging to work with, pretty much a "tripod only" lens.  Comes with a tripod mounting ring, uses 58mm filters and an odd little lens hood sells separately for around $40.
    Sigma 70mm f2.8 EX DG macro lens.... is another I don't know a whole lot about. Like their 50/2.8 macro, it's been around a long time and uses a micro motor type focus drive. It is the first lens in this list that has a Focus Limiter (2 ranges), which is a feature that can be helpful speeding up auto focusing. It sells for about $470, uses 62mm filters and comes with a matched lens hood.
    Tamron SP 90mm f2.8 Di is another excellent design that's been around a long, long time. I've still got and use manual focus versions of this lens dating back to the 1980s. The currently available micro motor version sells for $500 and, as a Di lens is usable on both crop and full frame cameras. It's got a focus limiter (2 ranges),  uses 55mm filters and includes a matching lens hood. It is not an IF lens.
    Tamron SP 90mm f2.8 Di VC USD is an updated version of their venerable 90mm, now with both an improved AF system (USD is similar to Canon's USM) and image stabilization (Tamron calls it VC). It is said to be better sealed against dust and moisture, and also uses an aperture with 9 curved blades to make for smoother background blurs. This lens is Internal Focusing (IF), has a Focus Limiter (4 ranges!), was introduced within the  last year or so selling for about  $750, uses 58mm filters and comes with a matched lens hood.
    Canon EF 100/2.8 USM is another excellent lens I use personally. This is the older version of this lens without IS (and not L-series, but you would be hard pressed to tell any difference in build quality, comparing it to some L-series such as the 180/3.5L macro). A key feature here is that it can optionally be fitted with a tripod mounting ring.... something that's not possible with most of the other lenses mentioned here. For macro work, I consider a tripod mount a very important feature, though some of the smaller lenses might be fairly usable on a tripod without one. This lens has USM focus drive, is IF, has a Focus Limiter (2 range), sells for about $550 presently, and uses 58mm filters. A matched lens hood is quite large and sells separately for about $40.  Tripod Ring B to fit it sells for about $140 (there are cheaper third party hoods and tripod rings).
    Canon EF 100/2.8 L IS USM is a newer model that primarily is upgraded with the addition of Image Stabilization (IS). Now designated an L, it includes a matched lens hood. Like the older model, a tripod ring can be optionally fitted. It has an improved Focus Limiter (increased to 3 ranges). It uses 62mm filters and is currently on sale for $900. Tripod Ring D sells for $172 (cheaper 3rd party ring is avail.).
    Tokina 100/2.8 ATX is both crop and full frame compatible and sells for about $400. I haven't used it, but it's another venerable design that's been around for a lot of years.  It has a Focus Limiter (2 range), uses 55mm filters and comes with a matched lens hood. I don't believe it's IF.
    Sigma 105/2.8 OS HSM  is currently on sale, heavily discounted, for about $670. I suspect Sigma is about to introduce a new version and that's why they are blowing out the current model with a large instant rebate. It is both crop sensor and full frame camera compatible. The current version has OS, which is Sigma's version of image stabilization, as well as HSM which is similar to Canon's USM focusing drive. This lens has a Focus Limiter (3 ranges), uses a 9 blade aperture, 62mm filters and comes with a matched hood. It cannot be fitted with a tripod ring.
    Canon, Sigma and Tamron all offer longer macro focal lengths... 150mm and 180mm. In general I'd say those are pretty long to use on a crop sensor camera such as your 70D or my 7Ds. They all come with tripod rings, which is good because longer macro lenses can be difficult to keep steady. But they all are also considerably more expensive, so I won't go into the details about them.
    Regarding auto focus speed... All macro lenses with AF are slower focusing for a couple reasons. One is that they have to move their focusing mechanisms a long, long way to go all the way from infinity to 1:1 magnification. Another is by design, they use "long throw" focus mechanisms that emphasize accuracy over speed, which is necessary because depth of field can be quite shallow at high magnifications. So, in general, don't expect a macro lens to offer the same AF speed as a non-macro lens with similar focus drive mechanism. What can help a lot are the type of focus drive and if the lens offers a Focus Limiter. Canon's USM, Sigma's HSM and Tamron's USD all will give faster focusing than micro motor drive systems on other lenses. Properly used, a Focus Limiter can really speed up focusing performance, too.
    When shooting macro, auto focus speed usually isn't all that critical. In fact, I often just focus manually. Accuracy often is more important, due to the shallow depth of field. So AF perfomance might be a bigger consideration if planning to also use the lens a lot for non-macro purposes.
    Image Stabilization (Canon OS, Sigma OS and Tamron VC) is offered on a few premium models. Canon's is a special hybrid version developed just for macro purposes, which most feel is a bit more effective than other forms of stabilization. Nikon actually was the first to put stabilization (they call it VR) on a macro lens, but most agree that while it's useful for non-macro shooting, it is of little practical assistance at 1:1 magnification. The Canon hybrid IS is considered to be a bit better at higher magnifications, but even it will be of limited effectiveness at 1:1. In other words, there may be times when you want to use a tripod or at least a monopod. And in those cases, particularly on some of the larger lenses, a tripod mounting ring can be a very nice thing to have (among all the above, only the Canon 100mm macro lenses can be fitted with a t'pod  ring).
    There are other options to "do macro", too. For example, you could simply get some Macro Extension Tubes to use with your current lens, to make it focus closer. Canon offers quality individual tubes in 25mm and 12mm lengths ($84 and $140 respectively). Kenko does too, but also offers a set of three that includes 12mm, 20mm and 36mm lengths (set sells for $200).  The Kenko are very close to the Canon in design, quality and performance.
    There are also less expensive sets (under $100) from Zeikos and Opteka. The Zeikos set includes 13mm, 21mm and 31mm and sell under a bunch of different brand names (Vivitar, Bower, Dot Line, ProOptic and many more). The Opteka set was just recently introduced and includes 12mm, 20mm and 36mm. All these sets are more plasticky than the Canon and Kenko tubes, but they do support autofocus and direct control of the aperture.
    AFAIK, all the currently sold macro extension tubes for Canon mount are compatible with both EF and EF-S lenses. (If you were shopping used you'd have to be careful because some of the older tubes were EF only and could not be used with your EF-S 18-135mm lens).  
    Canon's TS-E 45mm and TS-E 90mm lenses also are usable for near-macro and, with extension tubes added, macro shooting. These are Tilt-Shift lenses that give additional control over the plane of focus which can be used to good effect with macro and shallow depth of field. I use a TS-E 45mm a lot for table top studio shots of small products. However, these are manual focus only, largely tripod-only and rather pricey lenses, so I just wanted to mention them here. They are probably not something I'd recommend for a first time macro shooter or general purpose, outdoor, walk-around macro work.
    Personally, my two most-used macro lenses are a Canon EF 100/2.8 USM (the older model) and a Tamron SP 60/2.0. When I'm planning to shoot a lot of outdoor, walk-around macro shooting, the Canon lens is my first choice. However, it's rather large so when I'm not planning macro, but want to have a macro lens just in case, I'll substitute it with the much more compact Tamron lens. (Which also can replace two portrait lenses in my camera bag, so reduces my load by one lens serving in place of three.)
    Another key consideration is flash. Often when shooting macro it's a challenge to get enough light to allow a stopped down lens, desirable ISO and adequately fast shutter speed. So you probably will find yourself wanting to use flash sooner or later. Canon offers two macro-specific flashes: the MR14 EX Ring Lite and the MT24EX Twin Lite. I use both for different purposes. I prefer the Twin Lite for macro shots up to about 1:1, maybe 2:1 (double life size) magnification. The Ring Lite I mostly use for very high magnification shots with the MP-E 65mm lens.
    All the Canon lenses above have provision for, or can be adapted to allow for direct mounting of the two Canon macro flashes (Note: I believe there is a new "Mark II" version of the Ring Lite coming out soon). There also are adapters available to mount these flashes on non-macro Canon or onto third party lenses. It also is possible to use a single "standard" flash, along with an off-camera shoe cord and some sort of diffusion to hold back the flash, when shooting macro. I do that often with 550EX and 580EX II flashes.
    There are other macro-specific accessories you may want to consider eventually. Often I'll use a diffusion panel and/or a reflector when out in full sun, to reduce too extreme contrast and help fill too-deep shadows. A focusing stage is another useful thing, when shooting macro with a tripod.
    Finally, I recommend you pick up some books on macro photography. John Shaw's "Close-Ups in Nature" is perhaps the "Bible" among them and likely the most comprehensive. I also found books about macro by Tim Fitzharris and Joe & Mary MacDonald very helpful and interesting. I'm sure there are others, but those came immediately to mind.
    Alan Myers
    San Jose, Calif., USA
    "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
    GEAR: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
    FLICKR & PRINTROOM 
    Almost 2,400 words to answer a macro lens post? Alan, nobody can believe you can write so much (except TCampbell, ha ha) but you risk nobody wanting to read. See the link that follows for the sort of difficulty readers have with this sort of post, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Too_long;_didn't_read

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I restrict or allow a few client machines to connect to  Server ?

    In my setup I wanted to restrict the use of oracle Database. Database Version : 10.2.0.1.0 OS : Linux Into the sqlnet.ora file,below These parameters enable to configure access control to the database, TCP.EXCLUDED_NODES=(finance.us.acme.com, mktg.us

  • Connect a Yamaha Keyboard

    Hi I have recently purchased LE7 and I have a Yamaha PSR-78 keyboard which I would like to connect up and use with logic for recording. This keyboard does'nt have a MIDI connection and I have in the past successfully connected it to garageband and so

  • Read flat file form other than sapserver(not in sapser) in background mode

    Dear Friends, I want to upload data from flat file to sap in background mode. I know how to read file for application server in background mode, but my requirement is , i need to read the flat file data from other than sap server in backgound mode. p

  • Can't see my folders on icloud

    Can't see my folders in the mailbox on icloud. How to handle?

  • FLV in FLA...

    Hi, If someone provides me the FLV with the support SWF files and HTML page (so that the movie is embeded on the HTML page with the skin controls)...and I need to rename the movie from what they sent it as... will I also need the native FLA? Do I sim