Limit PO(Item category D instead of B)

Hi All,
I have created Limit PO in SRM in Development server and in Backend R/3 it is showning Item category D instead of B. I have deactivated all Gr based checks in Manage Business Partners and in Backend Vendors. Do anyone have any Idea why it is showing item category as D instead of B.
Best Regards
Lovkesh

Hi All,
We are working in Quality Server on Limit PO.
Case-1 : I created limit PO directly and it is picking up Item category B in the R/3 Backend.
Case-2: I created Shopping Cart with Limit Item and when PO is created, it is picking up Item Category as D in R/3 Backend.
Do anyone knows why the incorrect item category picked up in R/3 Backend when we Created Limit PO with respect to Shopping cart.
The Case1 and Case 2 working fine in our Development server. I removed all GR based ticks and Gr Config expected Ticks in Manager Busines Partners.
Best Regards
Lovkesh

Similar Messages

  • BOM with Item Category T

    Hi friends,
    The issue my user is having is that he has created a subcontracting PO ...and later while issuing thro MB1b 541... the system throws an error... PO HAS NO ITEMS..
    But PO has a BOM exploded ...when i check it has item category T instead of an L... By the time i could check CS03, the user has deleted the BOM .,so i suggested to create a new one with item category L...The issue got resolved.
    But my doubt is how this item category T has appeared in the BOM, since when i try creating a BOM with T i cannot enter matl code but my BOM which had popped in the PO had all details with matl code, desc , qty  and item category as T..
    Pls kindly advise and help me understand..
    Thanks
    nandu

    When creating your material BOM with Item category T, do not enter the material number.
    Only enter decripiton qty. and uom. This should allow you to create the BOM. You would then see this BOM in your Sub-Contract PO. I don't think it was possible you saw the material item in the BOM from your original T category items, as this would not be allowed per standard functionality, as you noted when trying to recreate the incorrect BOM.

  • Mis match in attributes of item category B-limit and PO item details

    Hi
    I could not able to create a Blanket PO with document type FO and item category B (limit).
    Normally for a blanket PO, GR is not allowed and IR is mandatory. So, I could able to see these checkboxes for GR (not set and grayed) and IR (set and grayed) in the item details of the PO in delivery and invoice tabs. But I end with an error message that 'GR is not set is used is not allowed' (exactly i don't remember but some thing like that)
    Before creating a blanket PO,  I found that in 'attributes of item categories', that for the item category B, GR is set and IR is not set (in customizing-OMH4). Of course, one cannot change the attributes of item categories.
    I suppose due to this mis-match in the attributes of item categories and that in the PO, I'm getting an error message while creating a blanket PO and could not able to save.
    Also I have checked all the system messages for the message displayed. No where(i.e. in any message class or category and for that message number) I found any such message defined with error in 'attributes of system messages' for purchasing, material master, inventory, invoice verification etc.
    I suppose this error message is coming somewhere from the application program for the PO.
    So, what can be the solution
    waiting for your reply.
    thank you
    Message was edited by:
            srinivas vandana

    Thank you for your answer. I haven't mention this point in my thread but I have already tried this.
    I have tried matching the GR and IR controls of account assignment category with PO GR, IR controls and also with item category B, GR, IR controls. Still i am getting the same error and could not able to save the PO
    Also I have checked the field settings for PO for all categories like transaction relevant, item category relevant, etc in customizing.
    Main problem is both GR and IR controls are being grayed in PO. Other wise I could able to change them as per my wish and could able to avoid the error even though the GR and IR controls in PO are correct as per the process requirement.
    If possible, please check the GR and IR controls for item category B (in my system it showing that GR is set with binding and IR is not set with binding). But it should be reverse as per the process requirements and in limit PO it is showing correctly. i.e. with GR is not set with binding and IR is set with binding.
    thank you

  • BAPI_PO_CREATE1 to create PO with limit item (item category = B)

    Hello,
    I want to create a PO with a limit item (category = B). What are the important parameters/tables which have to be filled.
    Currently I'm filling the following:
    POHEADER + POHEADERX
    POITEM + POITEMX
    POSCHEDULE + POSCHEDULEX
    POACCOUNT + POACCOUNTX
    POSRVACCESVALUES
    POLIMITS
    The package number in the item matches with the one which is used in POSRVACCESSVALUES and POLIMITS. When I debugg the function module everything looks fine to me and a PO is also created BUT it does not contain any item with category = B.
    Does anyone of you have an idea what is missing?
    Kind regards,
    Thomas

    hi,
    Please reffer the below link
    Blanket Purchase Order and the Framework Order
    Thanking you

  • SRM: Item category B/D for limit PO

    Hello Team,
    Want to pose a question ? When created a Limit PO into SRM (item category Limit), I found that the back-end PO replica is been created with item category D.
    Sounds starnge ?
    I believe i did build the system correct with new account assignment category for UNKNOWN. Still system is picking up wrong item category and hence all calculations are going awary.
    Please advice.
    Thanks in anticipation.

    Sandeep,
    In addition to what Yann said. My analysis is:
    There is one more dimention to this is that the vendor master flag "GR-based invoicing" has the impact on POs item category. If this flag from vendor master don't get transferred to PO then implement the OSS notes 956083.
    Now after applying this notes you see the standard functionality:
    If let say, we are creating PO with "Invoice Only" flag then there are follwoing options:
    a) If the "GR based invoice" flag in vendor master is checked then the POs goes into D item category and you can enter a service sheet for them.
    b) If the "GR based invoice" flag in vendor master is NOT checked then the POs goes into B item category and you can enter invoice just after PO.
    Please assign points as applicable.

  • PR with combination of item category B = limit, and account assignment : F

    Hi,
    Is it possible to create a blanket purchase order/framework requisition with combination item category B = limit, and account assignment : F ?
    Thanks in advance.
    Sachin
    Edited by: Sachin on Sep 20, 2011 12:05 PM

    Hi A.Purihella / Raj,
    Thanks for your reply 
    I have maintained the B and F combination in the customization.
    But when I am creating the PR using item category B with account assignment F (order) and after pressing enter, this account assignment F vanished from the PR and that field also turns in to gray mode. So system is not allowing to use u2018Fu2019 with B item category.
    Have you used or tested this scenario of using combination item category B with account assignment F (order) in PR and PO.
    Best Regards,
    Sachin

  • Item category limit (B) in frame work order

    Is it that item category B (limit) is mandetory in frame work order ? In that case it should appear by default. Can we use any other item category with frame work order logically?

    first the question is why do we use frame work order when we already have other document ype avilable
    answer is when ever we need to create a po for a validity period then frame work order is used
    next thing why do we use u=item category B or limit
    answer genrally frame. work order is used as blanket po means for those comodities which r procured very frequently but there monetrey value is very less
    and ur not intersted in doing there godd reciept u will be directly going for invoice reciept

  • Limit SC creates item category as 0 (blank) but PO not created indeed

    Hi All
    I create limit sc to get limit PO in the ECC..
    error  net price is greater than zero while creating purchase order .
    Shopping cart item_type = LIMI SHOULD determine the item category in the backend?
    How can i find out who is making item category = 0 in BAPI create PO .
    classic
    this impact net price is greater than zero?
    any tips is appreciated.
    Muthu

    Thanks
    06 218 Net price must be greater than 0   - error while creating PO - classic.
    le t me double check D is there or not
    D comes - if confirmation and invoice
    B - only invoice
    i do have D as well as B in my standard doc type.
    free texts are working fine.
    BBP_PDLIM - value limit as 123 INR
    muthu gets bbp_pd 
    Limit:
               Limit                Unlimited Exp_Value            Lim_Type
    0000000001                0.00  X                        0.00  S
    0000000001              123.00                         123.00  G
    my friend get  entry why in the bbp_pd for limit cart
    but others get
    Limit:
               Limit                Unlimited Exp_Value            Lim_Type
    0000000001            1,000.00                       1,000.00  G
    0000000001                0.00  X                        0.00  S
    Is some enhancements stoping this?
    muthu

  • Framework Order (FO) with Item Category B- Limit

    Hi , I have created one FO with item Category B , How I can enter invoice against that order?
    I have already tried it using MIRO . Is there any settings needed in customising . Please guide
    Edited by: Bhushan Bivalkar on Jul 8, 2010 12:53 PM

    >
    Bhushan Bivalkar wrote:
    > Hi , I have created one FO with item Category B , How I can enter invoice against that order?
    > I have already tried it using MIRO . Is there any settings needed in customising . Please guide
    >
    > Edited by: Bhushan Bivalkar on Jul 8, 2010 12:53 PM
    You do MIRO against FO the same way you do IR against Normal PO. FO is also a different document type and is considered a PO,
    just there is no GR taking place for FO document.

  • Service PO-Item category D and A/c assignment category K

    Hello all,
    I am novice in service procurement. Kindly help me understand this scenario.
    Client has created service PO with item category D and assignment category K.
    There is no service based IV or GR based IV clicked. If i see , services tab , in item details, it is totally blank. and in PO history, i can see all IR-L documents with 940 EUR as total, while the PO is for 1000 EUR.
    Limit shown in PO is 1000 EUR. Now if we go to MIRO screen, the system suggests remaining amount as 300 EUR instead of remaining 60 EUR.
    Kindly let me know your feedback on this.

    MIRO

  • To fill in the material number with item category u201CBu201D for Framework Order.

    The use of framework orders (also referred to as blanket purchase orders)  enables you to procure a variety of materials or services from a vendor up to a predefined maximum value (the value limit).
    Instead of a specific delivery date, you specify a validity period for the order.
    Goods receipts or the entry and acceptance of services performed are not necessary in the case of a framework PO and limit items.
    The invoices are posted directly with reference to the purchase order, provided that the specified value limit is not exceeded. When the value limit of the PO is reached, or the validity period is exceeded, the system issues a warning message. It is possible to book the invoices, but these are blocked for payment.
    During the phase of service performance, the cumulative u201Cactual" values (for the services actually performed) are continually updated in the underlying purchase. This enables you to monitor the progress of a procurement project on an ongoing basis. By comparing the "actual" value with the total value, you can always obtain an overview of the degree to which a budget for unplanned services or materials has been exhausted (i.e. see whether predefined limits have been reached or nearly reached).
    So with the Framework Order type (FO) and item category u201CBu201D you get the error that it is not allowed to fill in the material number with item category u201CBu201D.
    Please suggest me the possible solution to fill in the material number with item category u201CBu201D for Framework Order.
    Best Regards,
    Harisha

    The Framework order type is specialy defined for lesser value procurements (ex: stationeries, cleaning services ....) which are all not worthy to create Material Master at all.
    If you are very sure to fill the Material number, then proceed with some other document type.
    In what circumstances you want to put material number in FO order?
    Karthi.

  • Return of Free goods item - Problem in item category

    I am trying to create return order of Free sample billing
    (ZFDP). The return order type for the free sample is ZFDR.
    We have specified Item category for the ZFDR is RENN (Free good item) in IMG Activity -> Assign Item categories.
    When I create order and save it, it prompts me to enter G/L Account.
    This material is free. It should not prompt G/L Account for it. There is no revenue recognition specified for the item category. I tried changing item category to ZKLN i.e Free of charge item. This item category does not prompt for G/L Account while creating order. but I can not use this item category because it prompts me for Avialability. I can not remove the Avaialabilty check for it because the same item category is used in the Free sample order where availability check is required
    In ZFDP order type, we are issuing 100% discount by using R100
    discount condition.  Please let me know how can I solve this problem.
    I think there is some problem in my item category itself. .
    My setting for Item category in IMG - Define item category is
    same for both ZKLN and RENN. Only difference is RENN has returns
    tick and pricing field is blank. In ZKLN pricing is defined as B- 100%
    discount. I also tried changing the pricing option of RENN to B.
    But still it is asking for G/L Account.
    I can not use ZKLN instead of RENN because my ZKLN is used in the
    Free item Sales order.
    Please help.
    Regards
    Saurabh Gothivrekar

    Hi
    I got answer to my query. YOu need to specify the bill type while defining sales document type. This bill type should not have account assignment mentioned in it.
    I changed the bill type, which does not have Account assignment procedure attached to it.
    It has solved my problem

  • Mis match in attributes of item category B and Blanket PO item details

    Hi
    I could not able to create a Blanket PO with document type FO and item category B (limit).
    Normally for a blanket PO, GR is not allowed and IR is mandatory. So, I could able to see these checkboxes for GR (not set and grayed) and IR (set and grayed) in the item details of the PO in delivery and invoice tabs. But I end with an error message that 'GR is not set is used is not allowed' (exactly i don't remember but some thing like that)
    Before creating a blanket PO, I found that in 'attributes of item categories', that for the item category B, GR is set and IR is not set (in customizing-OMH4). Of course, one cannot change the attributes of item categories.
    I suppose due to this mis-match in the attributes of item categories and that in the PO, I'm getting an error message while creating a blanket PO and could not able to save.
    Also I have checked all the system messages for the message displayed. No where(i.e. in any message class or category and for that message number) I found any such message defined with error in 'attributes of system messages' for purchasing, material master, inventory, invoice verification etc.
    I suppose this error message is coming somewhere from the application program for the PO.
    So, what can be the solution
    waiting for your reply.
    thank you

    Thank you for your answer. I haven't mention this point in my thread but I have already tried this.
    I have tried matching the GR and IR controls of account assignment category with PO GR, IR controls and also with item category B, GR, IR controls. Still i am getting the same error and could not able to save the PO
    Also I have checked the field settings for PO for all categories like transaction relevant, item category relevant, etc in customizing.
    Main problem is both GR and IR controls are being grayed in PO. Other wise I could able to change them as per my wish and could able to avoid the error even though the GR and IR controls in PO are correct as per the process requirement.
    If possible, please check the GR and IR controls for item category B (in my system it showing that GR is set with binding and IR is not set with binding). But it should be reverse as per the process requirements and in limit PO it is showing correctly. i.e. with GR is not set with binding and IR is set with binding.
    thank you

  • Item category is not determined in CRM order

    Hi Friends,
    Our requirement is as follows
    We have 1 sales org like Z111 and 2 distribution channels like dist chan Z1 and Z2, we want a material say for eg "material A" should be 3rd party item by assigning item category grp "BANS" in sales org  Z111 and dist chan Z1. The same material i.e, "material A" should be standard item by assigning "NORM" in sales org  Z111 and dist chan Z2.
    We have done the above scnario in CRM system ( we have assigned BANS for material A in sales org  Z111 and dist chan Z1 and NORM for the same material in sales org  Z111 and dist chan Z2.
    But problem is when I create order for sales org  Z111 and dist chan Z1 in CRM, the item category is determined as TAN instead TAS. Item category determination is already existing the CRM system.
    This scenario is working fine in my back end system i.e, R/3 but it is not wrking in CRM.
    Can anyone give me some clue about this.
    Thanks in advance
    JM

    Hi JM
    First check in your CRM system if the material in extended to both the distribution channels.
    Tcode: COMMPR01
    Sale org tab should have entry for dist chan Z1 and Z2.
    Click on Z1 and maintain iten cat grp : BANS
    Click on Z2 and maintain iten cat grp : NORM
    Now check your item category determination. It should have following 2 entries:
    IMG > CRM > transactions > basic settings > define item category determination
    transaction type: ZORD
    item category group: BANS
    item category: TAS
    transaction type: ZORD
    item category group: NORM
    item category: TAN
    hope this helps
    Rupesh

  • Item Category

    Dear Friends,
    I am having Requirement like this
    iam  making the Consumption PO for 2 Line items(without material Master) and for Freight iam making 3rd Line Item with Item Category B (Limit). is it possible to distribute the cost of this with the first 2 line items
    the cost can be separtealy captured by Unplaneed delivery cost. i want to know whether we can capture in this way
    Please confirm.
    Sakthi.K

    Hi
    You cannot didtribute the Freight costs this way.
    The ideal way is to create a Freight Cond type in SPRO as a Header Cond type and then in your PO, enter the total Freight in the Header. Automatically, the Freight will get distributed to all the Line Items in the PO.
    To create a Header Freight Cond type, go to SPRO-> Matl Mgmt-> Purchasing-> Conditions->Price Deter Process-> Define Cond types.
    Here, copy the std FRA1 (or as per ur reqmt) to a new cond type and change the Cond type to Header Cond from Item Cond.
    Hope this clarifies.
    Thanks

Maybe you are looking for