Line item determination Ship-To

If I select 4130 as ship-to it will determine 3443 as ship-to at line item level
[IMG]http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y76/nphield/untitled-3.jpg[/IMG]
I'd like it to determine 4130 at line item level. Unfortunately with my requirements I am not able to filter ship-to partner from sold to 3443. The only ship-to attached to sold to 3443 is 4130, so i'm confused as to why 3443 is showing up
[IMG]http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y76/nphield/untitled2.jpg[/IMG]
Access sequence for line item
[IMG]http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y76/nphield/a.jpg[/IMG]
Any Help would greatly be appreciated
Nick

Hi Nick,
It showing you partner 3443 for Ship-to Party is because internally a sold-to party can also be Ship-to, Bill-to and Payer.
As in your acces sequence 0036, it first looks at Preceding Document, than Business Partner Relationship and than it will propose you the current partner.
Hence it finds 4130 and 3443. Also to know exactly how the partner were determined, you can activate Log for Partner Determination. For this first in the Customizing of Partner Procedure, select the Log checkbox. Now in the order, Partner Tab, you will be able to see one LOg Icon below.
Wish this helps.
Regards,
Shalini Chauhan

Similar Messages

How value for Inv Offsetting line item determined for revsesal

Hi,
I want to know the following for the reversal of Process Order for materials for which the price control is 'S'.
How the value for GBB (Inventory offsetting) is determined. I have observed it taking the weighted rate of the (Summation of the Total Actual Cost / Sumation of Actual Qunatity) * Reversal Quantity. The BSX line item is determined by Standard Price * Reversal Quantity
The balance is posted in the Price difference.
I want to know why this difference is determining tge line items.
I have gone thru SAP Note 216080 in this regard but failed to understandard the basic resaon why this is happening.
Regards
Partha

Dear colleague,
you are right
>note 422606:
a) The manufactured material has price control 'S' (Standard price).
   Valuation is carried out for goods receipts using the standard
   price that is currently valid.
   For the reversal of goods receipts, the valuation of the debit of
   the order (offsetting entry to stock posting) is carried out
   using the price determined from the quotient of value of goods
   received and quantity of goods received. That is, all previous
   goods receipts are used for the valuation of the reversal of a
   goods receipt, but order settlements are not used.
It is the standard system behaviour that the reversal of goods receipt
for production order are not valuated with standard price. All previous
goods receipts are used for the valuation of the reversal of a
goods receipt.
Goods receipts are always reversed with an average of the prices of
all goods receipts in the order history. Therefore price differences
may occur. This behaviour is as well explained in the attached
note 49995 in the reasons and prerequisites step. As well you find
an explanation in note's 422606 symptoms. the system tries to avoid the reversal
with posted values no longer possible.
If this replies your question ,please mark it as answered,
best regards,
maria

Purchase Order line items by ship to location

Is there an easy way to get a list of purchase orders for a given ship to location? We are running SRM 4.0 in extended classic.
Thanks,
Shawn O'Connor

hello Shawn
CRMD_PARTNER Table with Other table relations
CRMD_ORDERADM_H - transaction type of your PO since your in ecs - you can take one guid id and follow the procedure.
can you check up the above link
1). CRMD_ORDERADM_H -> Pick the GUID of your PO and pass it to table CRMD_LINK ( to the field GUID_HI).
2.) Select the GUID_SET where OBJTYPE_HI = u201C05u201D and OBJTYPE_SET = u201C07u201D
3) Pass the GUID_SET value to table CRMD_PARTNER (to the field GUID) and here you may get your desired partner function for plant /ship to address.
You check it up
regards
Muthu

Not displaying ship to party for second line item

Hi All,
When I am creating Sales order, I entered sold to pary,PO number,PO date,material (first line item)and qty.In partner functions for first line item it is displaying ship to party.But whaen I entered second line item & qty,ship to party is not displaying .
Please guide.
Thanks,
GTNR

Couple of questions !!!!
a) Was system allowing you to save
b) has the data properly configured in Set Up Partner Determination for Sales Document Item
c) is the ship to party different for first line item
d) did you check in incompletion log
G. Lakshmipathi

How to delete delivery Line item after the Invoice Passed accounting

Hi Experts,
                Outbound delivery was created w.r.t. Purchase order using VL10B.In the current process here batch is determined at delivery level.There was a line item with '0' Quantity which had a batch and another line item with Full Quantity confirmed for a batch and the PGI was done for the delivery.Invoice was created and passed accounting.
                 The problem is that in VF04 in the Billing due list we are able to see the '0' Quantity Line item as shipped but not yet billed.
                 Doing a PGR ,then delete the line item with '0' Quantity and then again doing PGI was suggested by few people but i feel that will be a very tediuos process since the document passed accounting.
                  Can anyone help in getting the line item deleted from the delivery document or suggest with ways to remove the data at VF04.
Warm Regards,
Jeff

I think you can comeplete the item by using T.code VL_COMPLETE, check and let us know your feedback

Line item Ship-to Info is not the same in Header Ship-to Party During Sales Order Creation via IDOC

We have observed that during creation of sales order using idoc, the line item ship-to party is not the same with header ship-to. The ship-to party info in line item is equivalent to the header's sold to party. To give you a quick background, Sold to party info is given in idoc and ship to party is being determined using table EDPAR. In this specific scenario, sold to customer is not the same with ship to customer.
Initial checking on the code leads us in function module VIEW_KUAGV. This FM populates partner details of sales order header and line item in program LVEDAF1Z
Below is the code for Sales order Header. Notice that WE_INPUT parameter which contains Ship to party is passed as exporting parameter in FM VIEW_KUAGV. This is the reason why Ship to Party is populated correctly in sales order header but not in sales order item.
Initially, it first set to Sold-To Party. However, if WE_INPUT is given or provided, partner details is set to Ship-To Party.
Please advise on how we can make the ship to party info in header and line item be consistent. This is SAP Standard program which why we are hesitant to make change on the program. If there is a configuration to make this happen, kindly advise.
Regards,
Rommel

Hi Jayesh,
If I understand you correctly, you want that when creating SO from Quoatation
the Ship to Party also follow/copy Ship to Party from Quotation, right?
Just to confirm with you, when you creating SO reference from Quotation, you
use copy/follow-up function, am I right?
You can do this by setting in configuration of Copy Control (like mentioned by Hui).
Step as follow :
1. Go to IMG->CRM->Transactions->Basic Settings->Copying Control for
    Business Transactions
2. Create your BAdi (Business Add-In for Copying Control), such as get Ship to
    Party value from source document and use it in current document
3. Use this Rule you have created in BAdi (no. 2), in copy control transaction type
    IMG->CRM->Transactions->Basic Settings->Copying Control for
    Business Transactions-> Define Copying Control for Transaction Types
4. Here you set Copying Routine for your transaction types (put name of your Badi
    created in step no. 2)
Or alternatively, you can set it on access sequence in Partner Function
Ship to Party in configuration. You can define access sequence the Ship
to Party is taken from Preceeding Document -> Ship To Party
1. Go to Partner Function access sequence :
    IMG->CRM->Basic Functions->Partner Processing->Define Access Sequence
2. Create new access sequence with following entry :
    - Source COM_PARTNER_A (PrecedingPartner)
    - Check Mapping for Partner Being search
    - Partner Function in Source = Ship To Party
3. Assign this Access Sequence in you Partner Function used in Sales Order Transaction
   Type.
Tell me if this is what you looking for
Gun.

Ship to party Jursidiction code change at line item leve in Sales order

Hell Gurus,
         Here is requirement for enhancement in Sales order. For determining tax following logic is requird to modify jursidiction code of ship-to party at line item level.
after entering header details and line item, then user exit should be there(which user exit??) and i need to compare countries of Ship-from(Plant i believe) and Ship-to party(customer) if country is same, then jursidiction code of Ship-to party at line item level should be changed with value from Jursidiction code of Ship-from party(plant this value will come from <b>T001W</b>) table. this should happen before save(while entering line items, user may go and check jursidiction code change)
what i need here is which user exit is triggerd ater line item entry, and how to change jursidiction value( i believe we need XVBAP, XVBPA, might be XADRC(Jursidiction code) . if some one provide user exit and logic with structure details then it would be of great help.
hoping to get reply
Thanks in Advance
Siva

Can you check in MV45AFZB Include but i am not sure
FORM USEREXIT_FILL_VBAP_FROM_HVBAP.
VBAP-zzfield = HVBAP-zzfield2.
ENDFORM.
FORM USEREXIT_SOURCE_DETERMINATION.
set source
VBAP-WERKS          = zzfield1.
set item category
VBAP-PSTYV          = zzfield2.
ENDFORM.
*eject
Reward Points if it is helpful
Thanks
Seshu

Ship-to address line item issue in ISA

We're facing a problem regarding ship-to addresses when placing orders in the B2C scenario of the ISA with a CRM backend. When an order is placed, the ship-to address is correctly populated in the header of the order. However, in the line items, this does not reflect. Instead, the ship-to value is the partner's standard address (the address used for bill-to and sold-to).
This occurs intermittently, and is inconsistent across the same partner, delivery address and line items: most of the time the correct behaviour will occur with a given combination, but from time to time the problem manifests with that same combination.
I realise this is a vague description, but would appreciate it if someone could suggest a direction of enquiry, or has any ideas. We are struggling to determine what could be causing these identical inputs to have divergent effects.

Hi James,
I have seen a similar problem in CRM ISA 4.0 on an early SP. It was however rectified in further patch releases. Please check in SAP OSS for updates.
Regards,
Ashok.

Line item Shipping data missing in STO

Hi, I am making an STO ( same company code ). I have added 4 line items in the STO.
For three line items, everything is ok. But when I added the fourth line item , the system gives an information message that sales org data and shipping data could not be found for the 4th line item.
And so I could not see the shipping data(consisting of delivery type, shipping point etc) tab for the 4th line item. For the first three items, the shipping tab exists.
The material for the 4th line item exists in both supplying and receiving plant and the material also exists in relevant sales org.
The outcome of the above issue is that the 4th line item is not copied to delivery with ref to STO !
Could any tell what is the config missing or what I need to do so that I have the shipping data for the 4th line item of the STO ?
regards
Pamela

Hi,
Check Below points relevant to your shipping maintained correctly.
u2022Shipping Data Determination
◦Shipping data (table EKPV) in STO is determined depending on:
1.Supplying Plant
2.Ship-to (customer of the receiving plant)
(IMG -> MM -> Purchasing -> Purchasing Order -Set up Stock Transfer Order -> Define Shipping Data for Plants)
3.Material Master Data
4.Delivery Type
(IMG -> MM -> Purchasing -> Purchasing Order -Set up Stock Transfer Order -> Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule)
◦Shipping data determination:
1.Sales Area: from supplying plant (T001W) (See SAP notes 169586, 170029, 170075, 170082, 303957)
2.Shipping Condition: default order type (u2018DLu2019) for delivery type (TVLK-DAART), otherwise customer master data (KNVV-VSBED)Delivery priority: material/customer/distribution chain (KNMT), otherwise customer master data (KNVV-LPRIO)
3.Unloading Point: from Ship-to, if available
4.Shipping Point: loading group/shipping condition/supplying plant (TVSTZ)
5.Route: usual criteria for route determination (TROLZ)
6.Delivery Type: Purchase order category/document type/supplying plant (T161V, different delivery types)
7.Route Schedule: with delivery scheduling (T161V)
8.Loading Group and Transportation Group: material master data (MARA, MARC)
9.Language of Material Description: customer master data (KNA1-SPRAS) (to read material master data from MAKT)
10.Incoterms: customer master data, from purchase order
11.Indicator for Order Combination: customer master data
12.Indicator for Partial Deliveries: material/customer/distribution chain (KNMT), otherwise customer master data (KNVV-KZTLF

Automatic Plant determination logic in the order line item level

Dear all,
I would like to know if there is a possibility to determine plants automatically, avoiding the standard plant
determination logic at line item level, to determine plant based on stock availability.
The process will be to skip the standard plant dtermination logic and drive the process through
based on ATP on plant level.
Coming more specific to the requirement the system determines the plant where the stock is available and if the stocks are not
sufficient the system goes to the next plant automaticaly and confirms the stock quantities, which also could mean that the ATP would run on plant 1 and then plant 2 and plant 3......depending on the availability of stocks with partial confirmations or full.
If there are existing user exits etc. available also when the configuration not available would welcome it.
Thanks

Hello
On more option I can see is of maintaining preferred plant in Table OIDAP.
Generally, this table is used for IS-Oil plant determination.
There you can set up one preferred plant and up to four alternative plants for a combination of
- sales area
-country
-transport zone (of the ship-to party)
-material number or material group.
The plant selected depends on the availability of material in the plant/storage location.
Regards
JP

Changing ship to address at line item level in CRM order

Hi All,
Is it posible to change the ship to address at line item level in CRM order either at the time of order creation or order change. if yes please let me know if we need to do any settings for this.
Thanks in advance.
JM

I agree with the previous comment, Please go to the Partner Determination procedure attached to the Transaction and in the partner functions associated with the that procedure, find Ship-to-Party and there will be a check box to "make it changeable" once determined. Check that and save it.. You should be all set
Thanks
Raj

The correct purchasing group is not being determined in the SC line item

Dear all,
I have a problem in that for some reason, when a shopping text line item is added to the shopping cart, the wrong purchasing group is determined. Further more when you look in the basic data section they is a drop down against the purchasing group field listing all pruchasing groups setup in the org plan via PPOMA_BBP.
This means that the requisitioner can change the purchasing group to any one even the one that is not relevant to his or her Purchasing Organisation. This of cause is not right because if the requisitioner is allowed to change the P/Grp, the wrong buyer may end up recieving the buyer completion work item.
What is causing this?
We have uniquely assigned P/Orgs to P/Grps and assigned resposiibility of P/GRPS to one unique ORg unit (company).
for example, a suppose product Category 1234567 is assigned to P/GRP 100 & P/GRP 100 is assigned to P/ORG 1000 and the P/GRP responsibility is set to Org unit(company) 1000, The requisition "sits" under an orgunit linked to company 1000.
If a requisitioner creates a text item and assigns product category 1234567, when the item is added to the shopping cart , I expect to see that the followig:
1. The Company code(CC)should be 1000 (This is happening)
2. The P/org should be 1000(This is happending)
3. The Plant sssignment is correct
4. The p/grp is worong. It appear that the first P/Grp is assigned plus a drop down listing all p/grps created for all purchasing P/Orgs.
Regards,
Grace

Yann,
Yes , we have (need to have)set 2 purchasing groups with the responsibility of the same product category. We have to do this because in our organisation, individual company purchasing organisations have same responsibilities to purchase similar products.
Please note that we have a classic scenario implementation. SRM 4, Server 5.
The business requirement and settings in the org plan is for example:
P/Grp 100 has the reponsibility to procure Prod cats LAM001 to LAM010 via its assigned P/org 1000 which is linked to own company 1000 and P/grp 200 also has the reponsibility to procure Prod cats LAM001 to LAM010 via its assigned P/org 2000 which is linked to own company 2000.
Please note that thr buyer responsible for p/grp 100 & 200 are the same and will be the same for similar product cats across the organisation as a whole. Its just the SRM does not allow you in the orgplan to assign the same p/grp to multiple p/orgs, we had to double up on the p/grps.
Also when a requisitioner who sits under company 2000 chooses a product cat 12345 if creating a SC text line, we DO NOT WANT the requisitioner to change the assigned p/grp.We want it defaulted to 200 (based on the org plan setting I have described above) and fixed(greyedout)
when thr line item viewed in the basic data section.
Do you think that because we have set the prod cat range LAM001 to LAM010, which is an alphanumeric product cat range, that could also be the reason for the dropdown listing all orplan p/grps even ones that do not have the product cat LAM001 to LAM010 in its responsubility assignments?
If you are saying that the system does not know which p/grp to pick, why its it displaying all "unrelated" p/rps in the dropdown. I atlest expect to see two p/grps in the dropdown 100 & 200, because only these two p/grps have been set with product cat responsibility for LAM001 to LAM010 in our org plan.
Also if you are saying that is the way SRM was designed to work (which may be the case!!!) how then can we set the org plan to meet our the purchasing org/purchasing grp /prod cat responsibility requirements I have described above?
Regards,
Grace

1 line item in the sales order ship to different shipping address

Hi,
Our customer A have 3 different branches (meaning 3 different shipping address).
During the creation of the sales order for 1 material A, I want to ship 50pc to this customer A:
10pc to address A1
20pc to address A2
20pc to address A3
In my sales order, is there a way I just create 1 line item with the order qty 50pc for this material A, but split into 3 schedule line with 3 different ship to address?
I know there is alternate way where I create 3 different line item (with order qty 10, 20 and 20) and change the ship to address in the Item -> Partner tab. But using this method, I have to create 3 times of the same material in 1 sales order, just with the different shipping address.
I want to know is there a way I just need to create 1 line item?
Kindly please advise. Thank you.

Hi there,
When you have 3 different ship-to address, system will anyway create 3 different deliveries. This is coz if the header data in shipping (ship-to) is different, system will split the deliveries. Routes are different to 3 ship-to addresses & they cannot be combined in the same delivery.
So as mentioned in above thread, create 3 different line items or create different sales orders all together for different ship-to parties.
Regards,
Sivanand

Logic of determining value for Inventory offsetting line item

Hi,
I want to know the following for the reversal of Process Order for materials for which the price control is 'S'.
How the value for GBB (Inventory offsetting) is determined. I have observed it taking the weighted rate of the (Summation of the Total Actual Cost / Sumation of Actual Qunatity) * Reversal Quantity. The BSX line item is determined by Standard Price * Reversal Quantity
The balance is posted in the Price difference.
I want to know why this difference is determining tge line items.
I have gone thru SAP Note 216080 in this regard but failed to understandard the basic resaon why this is happening.
Regards
Partha

Dear colleague,
you are right
>note 422606:
a) The manufactured material has price control 'S' (Standard price).
   Valuation is carried out for goods receipts using the standard
   price that is currently valid.
   For the reversal of goods receipts, the valuation of the debit of
   the order (offsetting entry to stock posting) is carried out
   using the price determined from the quotient of value of goods
   received and quantity of goods received. That is, all previous
   goods receipts are used for the valuation of the reversal of a
   goods receipt, but order settlements are not used.
It is the standard system behaviour that the reversal of goods receipt
for production order are not valuated with standard price. All previous
goods receipts are used for the valuation of the reversal of a
goods receipt.
Goods receipts are always reversed with an average of the prices of
all goods receipts in the order history. Therefore price differences
may occur. This behaviour is as well explained in the attached
note 49995 in the reasons and prerequisites step. As well you find
an explanation in note's 422606 symptoms. the system tries to avoid the reversal
with posted values no longer possible.
If this replies your question ,please mark it as answered,
best regards,
maria

Get the Ship-to-Party from Sales Order and Line item

Hi all,
I am developing one report in which I want to get the Ship-to-Party for a particular Sales Order and Sales Order Line item number.
I can see table VBPA from I can get value of KUNNAR and so on. But my concern is that can the Ship-to-Party differ for different line items for sales Order, if yes how to get that one, any table or any function module?
In my scenario i found out that ship-to-party only depend upon sales order and partner function not line item.
please help me..
regards,
vikas.

Hi,
First step: Customer Creation (T. Code: XD01)
i) Create Sold to Party (Ordering Party) with Account Group: Sold-to-Party
ii) Create as many Ship-to-Party and Bill-to Party, if reqd, with Account appropriate Account Groups.
iii) Match all the Ship-to-party/ Bill-to-Party/ Payer for the respective Sold-to-Party under Tab: Sales Area data, Sub-tab: Partners.
Second Step: Sales Order Creation (T.Code: VA01)
i) Enter Sold-to-Party at Header Level.
ii) Enter Materials (at Line-item level).
iii) Now, System will pop-up all the Ship-to-Party/ Bill-to Party/ Payer, Matched for the particular Sold-to-Party. Click on appropriate selection.
OR
Now, (if option doesn't pops-up) select the line and Double Click on to the same line. it will lead to the next page. Here, Click Tab: Partners
Now, in Column: Partner Function, search for appropriate Partner: Ship-to-Party or Bill-to-Party or Payer.
Remember: Sold-to-Party will be non-editable as entered at Header level.
Repeat the same for Each Line-item.
Regs,
Amit K. Yadav

Line item determination Ship-To

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for